ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology
This article is part of the Research TopicPredictive Models in Non-Invasive Respiratory Support: Insights from Clinical and Machine Learning ModelsView all 4 articles
Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Consciousness Disorders in Stroke Patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU): A Retrospective Study
Provisionally accepted- 1School of Nursing, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
- 2Department of Nursing, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: We used data from stroke patients in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) database to develop and validate risk prediction models for consciousness disorders in stroke patients using 11 machine learning algorithms. It aims to provide a basis for clinical assessment of consciousness changes in stroke patients. Methods:Data of 2,434 stroke patients were extracted from the MIMIC-IV database and randomly split into a training set and a validation set at a 7:3 ratio. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify independent predictors, and 11 machine learning algorithms were used to construct predictive models for post-stroke consciousness disorders. Calibration curves were applied to validate the calibration performance of the models, while decision curve analysis (DCA) was utilized to evaluate their clinical applicability, ultimately determining the optimal predictive model. Results: A total of 2,434 ICU stroke patients were included, with 1,706 assigned to the training set and 728 to the validation set. Logistic regression analysis identified four independent predictors (all P< 0.001): length of hospital stay, mechanical ventilation, nasogastric tube, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Among the 11 machine learning models, the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model exhibited the optimal performance across three dimensions: accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.824 in the training set, AUC = 0.795 in the validation set), stability (consistency between training and validation set results), and probability calibration (Brier score = 0.132 in the training set, Brier score = 0.140 in the validation set). Calibration curves demonstrated excellent agreement between the model's predictions and ideal values in both datasets, and DCA confirmed its favorable clinical utility. Conclusions: Multivariate analysis revealed that length of hospital stay, mechanical ventilation, nasogastric tube, and SOFA score are independent predictors of consciousness disorders in ICU stroke patients. The model constructed using the LightGBM algorithm showed the best comprehensive performance and can serve as an intuitive, personalized clinical tool. It assists healthcare providers in the early identification and risk stratification of stroke patients at high risk of consciousness disorders, thereby supporting the timely implementation of interventions to reduce the incidence of complications.
Keywords: Consciousness Disorders, Intensive Care Unit(ICU), machine learning, Risk prediction model, Stroke
Received: 18 Jul 2025; Accepted: 30 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Fang, Wang, Liu, Liu, Pei, Qi and Chang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Haixia Chang
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
