ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Healthcare Professions Education
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1671631
This article is part of the Research TopicThe Importance of Faculty Development in Medical EducationView all 28 articles
Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Clinical Laboratory Medicine Among Undergraduate Medical Interns in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey
Provisionally accepted- The Third People's Hospital of Hangzhou, Hangzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Undergraduate clinical medical interns often lack systematic laboratory medicine training, potentially impacting their diagnostic reasoning and patient safety. This study aimed to assess the perceived knowledge and attitudes towards clinical laboratory medicine among this population in China, addressing a significant gap in medical education evaluation. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March to April 2025 across 11 general hospitals in Eastern China (Shanghai, Hangzhou, Nanjing, Suzhou, Ningbo, Xuzhou, Shaoxing, Yangzhou, Huzhou, and Taizhou). The self-developed and validated 13-item Clinical Laboratory Knowledge and Attitudes Questionnaire (CLKAQ) was structured in three domains: Knowledge, Attitudes and Suggestions. All 303 clinical interns completed the instrument. SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 26.0 were used. Descriptive statistics (frequencies/percentages for qualitative data; mean ± SD for quantitative data) summarized characteristics, knowledge, and attitudes. Scale reliability and validity were confirmed. Normality was assessed via Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Group comparisons (gender, age, city tier) employed Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Spearman correlation examined knowledge-attitude relationships. Multiple response and content analysis supplemented quantitative findings. Results: The mean self-perceived knowledge scale score (5-point Likert scale) among the 303 interns was 2.22 ± 0.424. The mean attitude scale score (5-point Likert scale) was 4.05 ± 0.312. Significant differences emerged in key competencies: Gender disparities in report interpretation (Q3), perceived importance of laboratory knowledge (Q5), and learning motivation (Q7); Age-group variations in perceived knowledge adequacy (Q1), (Q5) and (Q7); Interns from third-tier cities demonstrated consistently higher self-perceived competence across all knowledge and attitude dimensions than those in tier-1/2 cities (p<0.05). A weak positive correlation linked knowledge and attitude levels (r=0.171, P<0.05). Critical differences were noted in preferred learning channels (Q10) and perceived barriers (Q11). Regarding open-ended questions, all interns expressed the need for increased clinical laboratory knowledge training and provided specific suggestions for such training. Conclusion: Undergraduate clinical interns demonstrated suboptimal clinical laboratory knowledge but expressed highly positive attitudes towards learning. This underscores the critical need to enhance clinical laboratory training during clerkship. Implementing measures to improve knowledge is necessary. These findings inform curriculum optimization and educational strategy development for clinical continuing education.
Keywords: Medical school curriculum, Laboratory Medicine knowledge, Clinical medicine students, Undergraduate Medical Education, Medical interns
Received: 25 Jul 2025; Accepted: 16 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yang, Tian, Chen and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Yonggang Yang, 43754962@qq.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.