Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Regulatory Science

Post-Marketing Surveillance of Upadacitinib: Multilevel Analysis of Venous Thromboembolism Reporting in Global Data and Rheumatoid Arthritis

Provisionally accepted
Renato  Ferreira da SilvaRenato Ferreira da Silva1*Mariana  LoboMariana Lobo1Ana  Rafaela AbreuAna Rafaela Abreu1Juliana  Pereira MacedoJuliana Pereira Macedo1Beatriz  MósBeatriz Mós1Carolina  Ameijeiras RodriguezCarolina Ameijeiras Rodriguez1Inês  LourençoInês Lourenço1Isabel  VieiraIsabel Vieira1Jorge  Junqueira PolóniaJorge Junqueira Polónia1Luís  GouveiaLuís Gouveia1Lurdes  SilvaLurdes Silva1Manuela  MoratoManuela Morato2Manuela  PintoManuela Pinto3Mario  ForresterMario Forrester1Marta  PereiraMarta Pereira4Nuno  Miguel RodriguesNuno Miguel Rodrigues5Tayanny  BiaseTayanny Biase1Inês  RibeiroInês Ribeiro1
  • 1Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • 2Universidade do Porto Faculdade de Farmacia, Porto, Portugal
  • 3Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Sao Joao, Porto, Portugal
  • 4Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Santo Antonio, Porto, Portugal
  • 5Unidade Local de Saude de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

ABSTRACT Background: Upadacitinib is an oral Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) selective inhibitor approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Concerns have emerged regarding a potential increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with JAK inhibitors (JAKi), though real-world evidence remains limited. Objective: To assess the post-marketing safety profile of upadacitinib in relation to VTE using global pharmacovigilance data. Methods: We conducted a disproportionality analysis using Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) from VigiBase, accessed via VigiLyze, including all reports up to February 20, 2025. Upadacitinib was compared with: (i) all other medicines; (ii) other second-line advanced RA therapies (bDMARDs and tsDMARDs); and (iii) other JAKi (baricitinib, tofacitinib, filgotinib). Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR) and Information Components (IC), with 95% confidence intervals, were calculated. Results: Descriptive analyses identified 678 VTE cases with upadacitinib, predominantly affecting women (68.1%), with a median age of 63 years. Most were classified as serious (91.2%), although fatal outcomes were less frequent than with comparators. In disproportionality analyses, upadacitinib showed a significant signal versus all medicines (ROR: 2.08; IC: 1.04) and versus other second-line therapies (ROR: 1.40; IC: 0.41), but not versus other JAKi (ROR: 0.98; IC: –0.04). In 2023, disproportionality declined, particularly relative to other JAKi (ROR: 0.57; IC: –0.38). Conclusions: Upadacitinib-related VTE cases display distinct clinical characteristics. These findings support continued pharmacovigilance and the need for robust real-world studies to clarify absolute and comparative risks, inform regulation, and guide personalised therapeutic strategies in RA.

Keywords: Janus kinase inhibitors, Venous Thromboembolism, Pharmacovigilance, Drug-Related Side Effectsand Adverse Reactions, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems

Received: 11 Aug 2025; Accepted: 29 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ferreira da Silva, Lobo, Abreu, Macedo, Mós, Rodriguez, Lourenço, Vieira, Polónia, Gouveia, Silva, Morato, Pinto, Forrester, Pereira, Rodrigues, Biase and Ribeiro. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Renato Ferreira da Silva, renato.ivos@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.