CORRECTION article
Front. Med.
Sec. Ophthalmology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1689341
Correction: Comparative effectiveness of gamified binocular treatment versus conventional patching for amblyopia: a randomized clinical trial
Provisionally accepted
- Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Correction on: Chen Y, Chen Y, Han X, Yang Z. Comparative effectiveness of gamified binocular treatment versus conventional patching for amblyopia: a randomized clinical trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025;12:1560203. Published 2025 Jun 2. doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1560203 Equal contribution statement Missing In the published article, Ying Chen and Yuzhen Chen were erroneously omitted as equal contributing authors. The corrected statement reads: 'Ying Chen and Yuzhen Chen contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.' The original version of this article has been updated.
Keywords: Amblyopia, Binocular therapy, dichoptic treatment, Home-based treatment, stereopsis
Received: 20 Aug 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Chen, Han and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Zijian Yang, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.