You're viewing our updated article page. If you need more time to adjust, you can return to the old layout.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med., 08 January 2026

Sec. Translational Medicine

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1704209

Genotype–phenotype correlations in 18 European patients with heterozygous KIF1A variants: key considerations for assessing KIF1A variant causality

  • 1. Neurogenetic Laboratory, Department of Paediatric Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia

  • 2. Neuromuscular Center Zurich and Department of Paediatric Neurology, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

  • 3. Institute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland

  • 4. Department of Medical Genetics, Masaryk Hospital, Ústí nad Labem, Czechia

  • 5. Department of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Faculty Hospital, Brno, Czechia

  • 6. Department of Biology and Medical Genetics, Second Faculty of Medicine Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia

  • 7. Institute of Molecular and Clinical Pathology and Medical Genetics, University Hospital Ostrava and Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Medical Faculty, Ostrava, Czechia

  • 8. Department of Neurology, Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia

  • 9. Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czechia

Article metrics

View details

643

Views

122

Downloads

Abstract

Background:

Variants in the KIF1A have been associated with a wide range of phenotypes. Most variants are found in the protein’s motor domain. The clinical phenotype of KIF1A-associated disorders (KAND) correlates with the position and the type of variant. Missense variants in the motor domain are predominantly associated with severe phenotypes and often occur de novo.

Methods:

Patients from the Czech Republic and Switzerland were identified during DNA diagnostics for neuromuscular or neurodevelopmental disorders. Clinical and genetic data were analyzed retrospectively.

Results:

A total of 18 patients with heterozygous KIF1A variants were reported. The clinical spectrum ranges from a very severe congenital phenotype to mild spastic paraplegia or early-onset slowly progressive neuropathy. Among patients with early clinical manifestation (n = 13; congenital symptoms, gross motor delay, complicated/pure spastic paraplegia, neuropathy), all detected variants were missense and localized in the motor domain, eight times confirmed to be de novo. In individuals with adult onset (n = 5; all spastic paraplegia), a frameshift variant outside the motor domain was also detected in one case.

Conclusion:

KAND phenotypes are not only limited to severe and early-onset phenotypes but also include adult-onset less severe ones. The localization of a missense KIF1A variant in the motor domain corresponds with a more severe disease, but not exclusively. Given the broad phenotypic spectrum associated with KIF1A variants, each variant should be individually evaluated for pathogenicity. Based on our findings, we propose a supporting algorithm outlining key considerations to support variant causality and the prediction of the associated phenotype.

1 Introduction

The kinesin family member 1A gene (KIF1A) encodes the microtubule-associated motor protein KIF1A, which belongs to the kinesin-3 subfamily. Kinesins play essential roles in neuronal function by transporting cargoes in the anterograde direction along microtubules (1). KIF1A is abundantly expressed in the axons of the neurons in the brain and spinal cord.1 The phenotype of KIF1A knockout mice exhibits motor and sensory impairments, reduced synaptic vesicle density in nerve terminals, and the accumulation of clear vesicles in nerve cell bodies (2). In humans, pathogenic KIF1A variants have been linked to a broad spectrum of neurological disorders, which are summarized under the umbrella term of KIF1A-associated neurological disorders (KANDs) (3). Initially, biallelic KIF1A variants were described with the phenotype of hereditary spastic paraplegia (SPG30) and hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy (HSAN2C) (4–6). Later, inherited or de novo monoallelic (heterozygous) KIF1A variants were associated with pure (uncomplicated) or complicated hereditary spastic paraplegia (7–9) and finally de novo KIF1A variants with severe neurodegenerative conditions or a broader range of clinical phenotypes grouped under the term NESCAV syndrome (neurodegeneration and spasticity with or without cerebellar atrophy or cortical visual impairment; formerly also classified as autosomal dominant intellectual disability type 9 [MRD9]) and/or PEHO syndrome (progressive encephalopathy with oedema, hypsarrhythmia, and optic atrophy) (10–13). Recently, hypotonia, spasticity, ataxia, epilepsy, optic nerve and cerebellar atrophy, and cognitive impairment have been reported as the most common clinical features in KAND patients (14). The KAND spectrum shows significant differences in terms of the severity of clinical symptoms and age of onset (from congenital or infantile onset to adult onset). In general, congenital/early-onset monoallelic cases exhibit a faster degenerative and severe disease progression than adult-onset and biallelic cases (15, 16).

KIF1A consists of several protein domains, of which the motor domain is of particular importance for the pathogenesis of KAND. The kinesin motor domain is responsible for transport processes along the axon, and the severity of clinical symptoms appears to depend on the presence of a variant in this particular protein domain (17). Pathogenic variants localized in the motor domain have more disruptive effects on the proper function of the protein when compared to variants in other protein domains (18–20). The vast majority of described pathogenic variants are localized in the motor domain and often occur de novo (3, 17). A total of 129 pathogenic KIF1A variants (mostly missense variants, only 20 truncating) have been reported, mainly resulting in spastic paraplegia (pure or complicated), several variants with severe complex phenotype, and a few variants with mild neuropathy (according to HGMD Profess. 2025.2 version). Missense variants are thought to have a dominant-negative effect, in which a slight conformational change results in non-functional protein that replaces the normal, functional protein (21). Consequently, missense KIF1A variants may have more severe phenotypic effects than truncating variants (22). This observation contrasts with the ACMG/AMP classification guidelines and standard variant-pathogenicity predictions based on amino acid and protein conformation changes, which may not be relevant in the case of the KIF1A gene.

In this study, we report on 18 patients from 15 families of European descent with a heterozygous KIF1A variant; eight were confirmed as de novo and include five novel variants. The clinical spectrum ranges from severe phenotypes (including congenital) with spasticity, hypotonia, ataxia, epilepsy, and cognitive decline to pure spastic paraplegia or neuropathy with varying degrees of disability. Based on our results, we propose a supportive algorithm for the assessment of pathogenicity/causality of KIF1A variants with the expected phenotype.

2 Patients and methods

2.1 Patients

Participants with KIF1A variants in this retrospective cohort study were recruited in two centers:

  • Neurogenetic laboratory, Department of Paediatric Neurology of the Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. The Neurogenetic Laboratory is the core facility in the Czech Republic providing comprehensive genetic testing of neuromuscular disorders connected to the ERN-RDN European Reference Network; and

  • Paediatric Neuromuscular Center Zurich, Department of Paediatric Neurology, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. The Neuromuscular Centre Zurich is a national reference center for rare neuromuscular diseases, accredited by Kosek (Nationale Koordination Seltene Krankheiten / National Coordination of Rare Diseases).

2.2 Genetic testing

For the patients examined in the Czech Republic, the coding regions, as well as the exon–intron boundaries up to 10 base pairs into the intron of all genes associated with (i) hereditary spastic paraplegias and neuropathies or (ii) all OMIM genes, were analyzed. NGS libraries were prepared with the SureSelect Exome v.5, v.6, or v.8 kit (Agilent Technologies, CA, United States) or Twist Exome 2.0 plus Comprehensive Exome Spike-In (TWIST Bioscience, CA, United States). FASTQ data were analyzed twice independently using (i) an in-house pipeline based on the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) best-practices protocol (23) with Annovar software annotations2 and (ii) SureCall software (Agilent Technologies, CA, United States) with QIAGEN Ingenuity Variant analysis software3 evaluation. For patients examined in Switzerland, the coding regions of all genes associated with neurodevelopmental disorders and the exon-intron boundaries up to 20 base pairs into the intron, were analyzed using DRAGEN V4.0 (Illumina, CA, United States) and NxClinical 6.2 (BioDiscovery, Inc.). Sanger sequencing was used for segregation analysis. Variants were named according to the transcript NM_001244008.2.

The following aspects were considered to assess causality: de novo occurrence (or segregation analysis in family where available), phenotype correlation with previously reported according to HGMD Profess.4 Frequency (allele count) in GnomAD version v4.1 (24) reported in ClinVar,5 and several prediction tools (ACMG classification by GeneBe, AlphaMissense) (25–27). Six polymorphic microsatellite markers (in-house designed) were used for parentage testing for de novo occurrence.

2.3 Phenotype description

The source for data extraction was the clinical information system of the two centers. The following data were extracted from the clinical information system: KIF1A variant and characteristics (localization within the protein, results from segregation analysis if available), main clinical phenotype, sex, age, and symptoms at onset of the disease, age at first examination, presence of specific symptoms (spasticity, peripheral neuropathy, walking impairment, ataxia, upper limb impairment, dysarthria, global developmental delay and/or intellectual disability, cognitive decline), imaging results (brain and/or spinal cord MRI), and other relevant features (e.g., epilepsy).

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients, or their legal guardians, prior to their inclusion in the study and prior to disease-related genetic testing. This study meets the criteria and principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and ethical board approval was obtained from all participating facilities.

3 Results

3.1 Clinical findings

We report 18 patients (7 males, 11 females) from 15 families with a heterozygous KIF1A variant. In patients #17 and #18 (Table 1), the pathogenicity of the identified variants could not be sufficiently confirmed. Therefore, their clinical and genetic data are reported; however, they were excluded from the subsequent summary dataset presented in Table 2. Both individuals presented with late-onset disease and a phenotype consistent with pure spastic paraparesis. Among the remaining 16 KAND patients (#1–#16; Table 1), the age of onset demonstrated a bimodal distribution in: (i) early childhood (12/16) or even congenitally (1/16) or (ii) adulthood (3/16; 20–42 years). The main clinical diagnosis was pure or complicated spastic paraplegia with varying clinical signs and severities, including upper limb impairment, ataxia, epilepsy, intellectual disability, and cognitive decline. Two patients (#14 and #16) presented with very severe phenotypes; patient #14, who had even congenital symptoms and a complex phenotype of severe congenital axonal neuropathy without spasticity, died of respiratory failure at 3 months of age. The main clinical diagnosis of patient #12 was ataxia with delayed gross motor development. Patient #4 was diagnosed with axonal neuropathy confirmed by electromyography (EMG). Her initial symptoms appeared in early childhood as frequent tripping. At 39 years of age, she is able to walk without support, and the disease has followed a slowly progressive course (See Table 1 for details).

Table 1

Pathogenicity of KIF1A variant Pathogenic Uncertain
Patient nr. 1 (sister of Pt. 2, mother of Pt. 3) 2 (sister of Pt. 1) 3 (son of Pt.1) 4 5 (son of Pt. 6) 6 (mother of Pt. 5) 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Main clinical diagnosis Pure SPG Pure SPG Pure SPG Axonal neuropathy Pure SPG Pure SPG Complex SPG Complex SPG Pure SPG Complex SPG Complex SPG Ataxia Complex SPG Severe congenital HMSN, respiratory failure, died at 3 months Complex SPG Complex SPG Pure SPG Pure SPG
Variant [heterozygous] c.110T>C c.110T>C c.110T>C c.232G>A c.499C>T c.499C>T c.647G>A c.761G>A c.761G>A c.773C>T c.821C>T c.914C>T c.914C>T c.920G>A c.939G>C c.946C>T c.925 T>A c.871G>A c.3363_3364del*
KIF1A variant location Motor domain Motor domain Motor domain Motor domain Motor domain Motor domain Motor domain Motor domain Motor domain Motor domain Motor domain Motor domain Motor domain Motor domain Motor domain Motor domain Motor domain Motor domain [only c.871G>A]
Segregation analysis/familial occurrence Familial (affected sisters and father) Healthy mother and brother, wild type, healthy father not tested Familial (affected mother and son) Unknown De novo Familial (both parents with a diagnosis of early-onset spastic paraparesis /cerebral palsy; variant inherited from father†) De novo De novo De novo De novo De novo De novo De novo unknown unknown
Sex F F M F M F M F F M F M F F M F M F
Age at onset [years] 42 35 20 <5 4–5 4 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Antenatal 6–8 (early school age) <1 30+ 50+
Age at first examination [years] ? ? 22 39 4–5 9 <1 <1 9 2 <1 <1 <1 0 10 <1 53 52
Symptoms at onset Spastic gait with fallings Abnormal gait Spastic paraparesis Tripping Abnormal gait Abnormal gait Muscular hypotonia, gross motor developmental delay, ataxia Spastic paraparesis, epilepsy Spastic paraparesis Gross motor developmental delay Abnormal gait Gross motor developmental delay Poor neonatal adaptation, continual respiratory support (CPAP) required, severe distal flaccid paresis Abnormal gait Severe global developmental delay, spasticity, epilepsy gait difficulties spastic paraparesis
Spasticity + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Peripheral neuropathy Mild ? + + Unknown + (axonal) + (axonal) Unknown
Gait impairment Severe, uses wheelchair Severe, uses wheelchair Spastic gait, walk without support Walk without support Mild, walk without aids Mild, walk without aids + Severe, uses crutches Severe, uses crutches + Severe, walk with support Walk with support Spastic / atactic gait n.a. Severe, uses wheelchair Walk with support mild, walk without aids mild
Ataxia mild + + + n.a. +
Upper limb impairment Mild muscle atrophies Dysmetria Spasticity Dysmetria Severe distal flaccid paresis Fine motor impairment Tremor, dysmetria, spasticity spasticity, hyperreflexia
Dysarthria ? n.a. +
Incontinence + ? ? + ? ? + n.a. + + ?
Global developmental delay / Intellectual disability + Mild intellectual disability Mild intellectual disability Motor developmental delay / IQ 76–86 borderline Intellectual disability + / borderline (developmental quotient 70) + n.a. Intellectual disability +
Cognitive decline Mild decline n.a. Severe decline
MRI brain/spine Not performed Normal Not performed Not performed Not performed Not performed Cerebellar atrophy Not performed Not performed Brain: hypoplasia CC, accentuated cerebellar fissure, spine: normal Normal Accentuated cerebellar fissure Cerebellar hypoplasia Not performed, brain ultrasound without pathological finding Normal Progressive cerebellar atrophy brain: deposits of paramagnetic substances in the substantia nigra bilat, crus cerebri and right basal ganglia, spine: normal mild thoracic spine atrophy
Other Optical nerves atrophy Visual impairment, challenging behavior Limited vocabulary Optic nerve hypoplasia, strabismus Aggressiveness Limited vocabulary, growth hormone deficiency

Summary of KIF1A variants and phenotypes in 18 KAND patients.

*Compound heterozygous, †No detailed clinical information available. SPG spastic paraparesis/paraplegia, n.a., not analysed/applicable, Pt. Patient.

Table 2

KAND patients A B
All n = 16 [100%] Early/congenital onset n = 13 [100%] Adult onset n = 3 [100%]
Age at onset Congenital or early childhood 13 [81%] n.a. n.a.
Adulthood 3 [19%] n.a. n.a.
Walking Unable/with aids 10 [63%] 8 [62%] 2 [67%]
Able without aids/no limitation 6 [37%] 5 [38%] 1 [33%]
Spasticity 14 [88%] 11 [85%] 3 [100%]
Neuropathy (only) 2 [13%] 2 [15%]
Spasticity + neuropathy 3 [19%] 2 [15%] 1 [33%]
Ataxia 5 [31%] 4 [31%]
Dysarthria 1 [6%] 1 [8%]
Upper limb impairment 7 [44%] 7 [54%]
Incontinence 5 [31%] 4 [31%] 1 [33%]
Epilepsy 2 [13%] 2 [15%]
Global developmental delay/intellectual disability 10 [63%] 10 [77%]
Cognitive decline 2 [13%] 2 [26%]

Summary of symptoms of reported KAND patients.

The data from patients #17 and #18 were not included as the pathogenicity of the KIF1A variant was not fully confirmed: (A) all patients and (B) divided according to age at onset. n.a., not applicable.

Spasticity was present in 88% of patients (14/16), and in 3 of them, it was combined with neuropathy. In the remaining two patients, the primary manifestation was axonal neuropathy. The degree of walking impairment varied from an inability to walk to a mild impairment with minor limitations. Of all the reported patients, 63% (10/16) were unable to walk (wheelchair dependent) or required assistive devices. The degree of gait impairment in the reported cohort does not depend on whether the disease had an early or adult onset; in both groups, two-thirds of patients were either unable to walk or required assistive devices, while one-third walk unaided. Global developmental delay and/or intellectual disability was observed only in patients with early onset, and it accounted for 77% (10/13).

In terms of other clinical symptoms, 44% (7/16) of patients had upper limb impairment. Incontinence was reported in 31% (5/16). Two patients suffered from epilepsy. Dysarthria was noted only in one patient, and in three patients, visual impairment or optic nerve atrophy/hypoplasia with strabismus was present. Two patients exhibited challenging behavior or aggressiveness (see Tables 1, 2, for details).

MRI examinations of the brain or spinal cord were performed on nine patients. In five patients, changes/atrophies of varying degrees were revealed and accounted for 56% (5/9). In five early-onset cases, the cerebellum was affected, primarily showing hypoplasia or atrophy. Clinical symptoms are summarized and described in detail in Tables 1, 2.

3.2 Genetic findings

A total of 14 different heterozygous KIF1A variants were detected. Eleven variants are assumed to be pathogenic and causal (Tables 1, 3). Eight variants were confirmed with the de novo occurrence. Two variants—c.761G>A and c.914C>T—were each detected twice across four index patients (mostly de novo). Two variants—c.821C>T and c.939G>C—were not previously documented; both were detected in two index patients with early-onset and relatively severe phenotypes. Variant c.110T>C segregated with the disorder in three family members (#1, #2, #3) with adult-onset pure spastic paraplegia. Variant c.499C>T was detected in patient #5 and his mother #6 (both affected from childhood), as well as in a healthy sister aged 20 years. Although segregation of the variant is inconsistent, the variant is considered causative (discussed in detail later).

Table 3

Variant’s pathogenicity Patient nr. Heterozygous variant NM_001244008.2 Protein change Segregation analysis/familial occurrence Protein domain presence HGMD accession/variant class GnomAD_total (v4.1) /alelle frequency/ ClinVar (ID) GeneBeprediction ACMGgenerated by GeneBe Alpha missensescore Alpha missenseprediction HGMD; diagnosis described Assumed causality
Pathogenic 1, 2, 3 c.110T>C p.(Ile37Thr) Familial/present in affected sister, affected father not tested Kinesin motor CM1810577/DM Uncertain significance (871018) Uncertain significance PM2, PP3 0.98 Likely_pathogenic Described 3x, [1x de novo]; spastic paraplegia Pathogenic
4 c.232G>A p.(Gly78Ser) Healthy mother and brother wild type, healthy father not tested Kinesin motor CM200409/DM 0.00012% Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (373905) Pathogenic PM1, PM2, PM5, PP3_Moderate, PP5_Very_Strong 0.84 Likely_pathogenic Described 2x [1x de novo]; spastic paraplegia Pathogenic
5, 6 c.499C>T p.(Arg167Cys) Familial / affected mother, son, healthy daugter (age 20) all heterozygous Kinesin motor CM150181/DM 0.000657% Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (162055) Pathogenic PM1, PM2, PM5, PP3_Strong, PP5_Very_Strong 0.93 Likely_pathogenic Described 4x, [1xde novo]; spastic paraplegia Pathogenic
7 c.647G>A p.(Arg216His) Unknown/n.p. Kinesin motor CM157165/DM Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (208161) Pathogenic PM1, PM2, PM5, PP3_Strong, PP5_Very_Strong 0.99 Likely_pathogenic Described 12x [8x de novo]; developmental disorder/delay/cerebellar ataxia/spastic paraplegia/neurodegeneration and spasticity Pathogenic
8, 9 c.761G>A p.(Arg254Gln) Patient 8: de novo Patient 9: familial/uninformative, both parents under diagnosis spastic paraparesis/cerebral palsy, variant inherited from father Kinesin motor CM1514258/DM Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (162055) Pathogenic PM1, PM2, PM5, PP3_Strong, PP5_Very_Strong 0.99 Likely_pathogenic Described 11x [5x de novo]; childhood cerebellar hypoplasia and atrophy/Neurodevelopmental disorder/spastic paraplegia/NESCAV syndrome Pathogenic
10 c.773C>T p.(Thr258Met) De novo Kinesin motor CM1714233/DM Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (464261) Pathogenic PM1, PM2, PM5, PP3_Moderate, PP5_Very_Strong 0.98 Likely_pathogenic Described 6x [1xde novo]; neurological disorder/neuropathy/dyskinesia/dystonia Pathogenic
11 c.821C>T p.(Ser274Leu) De novo Kinesin motor Novel Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (211298) Pathogenic PM1, PM2, PP3_Moderate, PP5_Very_Strong 1.00 Likely_pathogenic Pathogenic
12, 13 c.914C>T p.(Pro305Leu) De novo Kinesin motor CM1921975/DM Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (428604) Pathogenic PM1, PM2, PP3_Moderate, PP5_Very_Strong 0.93 Likely_pathogenic Described 13x [6x de novo]; developmental disorder/congenital ataxia/dystonia Pathogenic
14 c.920G>A p.(Arg307Gln) De novo Kinesin motor CM1514260/DM Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (418275) Pathogenic PM1, PM2, PM5, PP3_Strong, PP5_Very_Strong 0.95 Likely_pathogenic Described 9x [5x de novo]; spastic paraplegia with CNS involvement/cerebellar hypoplasia/spastic paraplegia Pathogenic
15 c.939G>C p.(Trp313Cys) De novo Kinesin motor Novel Likely pathogenic PM1, PM2, PP3_Strong 1.00 Likely_pathogenic Pathogenic
16 c.946C>T p.(Arg316Trp) De novo Kinesin motor CM150188/DM Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (162060) Pathogenic PM1, PM2, PM5, PP3_Strong, PP5_Very_Strong 0.99 Likely_pathogenic Described 13x [5x de novo], severe impairment/spastic paraplegia/NESCAV syndrome Pathogenic
Uncertain 17 c.925T>A p.(Ser309Thr) Unknown/not present in healthy brother Kinesin motor Novel Pathogenic PM1, PM2, PM5, PP3_Strong 0.76 Likely_pathogenic Uncertain (insufficient segregation)
18* c.3363_3364del p.(Leu1222Aspfs*22) Unknown/n.p. Novel Pathogenic PVS1, PM2 Uncertain (missing segregation)
Likely benign c.871G>A p.(Gly291Arg) Unknown/n.p. Kinesin motor 0.00007142% Uncertain significance (1307488) Uncertain significance PM2 0.50 Ambiguous Likely benign (frequency, predictions)

Detected KIF1A variants, characteristics, and predictions.

*Compound heterozygous; n.p. not performed.

The causality of variants c.925T>A and c.3363_3364del was uncertain because it was not possible to perform a segregation analysis in patients with adult onset, as family members were not available or deceased. Variant c.871G>A is assumed to be rather benign because of its frequency and benign predictions (Table 3).

The genetic aspects of the detected KIF1A variants are summarized in detail in Table 3. All variants except one were missense and were localized in the kinesin motor domain, and all patients were heterozygotes for the KIF1A variant. The only exception is patient #18, who had adult-onset pure spastic paraplegia and was compound heterozygous for one missense variant, c.871G>A, and one truncating variant, c.3363_3364del, localized outside the kinesin motor domain. Only the truncating variant, c.3363_3364del, was considered pathogenic [Pedigrees of all reported patients in Supplementary material 1].

4 Discussion

4.1 Genotype–phenotype correlation

We summarized the clinical and genetic aspects of 18 patients with KIF1A variants and assessed the causality of each variant. We described that KIF1A variants can be associated with a very severe and early lethal course (e.g., patient #14 harboring a de novo KIF1A variant). In the reported cohort, spasticity and complex spastic paraplegia were the most common phenotypes. The majority of the described patients manifested a more severe phenotype with early onset. However, even in early-onset cases, a milder phenotype with slow progression may be observed (as in patient #4). All patients carry a variant within the motor domain, except for one truncating variant located outside this domain, which is consistent with previous reports (15, 17).

A KIF1A variant confirmed to be de novo in a patient with a severe early-onset phenotype can be considered causal and pathogenic. Moreover, if the variant has been previously described in association with a KAND, it provides additional support for pathogenicity. Nevertheless, determining variant causality can be challenging even in early-onset cases. The family with patients #5 and #6 (heterozygous for the c.499C>T variant) illustrates this complexity. The symptomatic patient #5 and his mother #6 have suffered from spasticity and an abnormal gait since childhood. However, the sister of patient #5, who is also heterozygous for this variant, is free of symptoms at the age of 20. This variant has been described two times in the literature, both de novo and with autosomal dominant inheritance, and with variable age of symptom onset (13) (HGMD Access. CM150181) and with autosomal dominant inheritance. Rudenskaya et al. (28) reported recently that the variant segregated in five affected family members who manifested the disorder at very different ages. In addition, Gallagher et al. described this variant in a 50-year-old patient in whom the gait impairment began in childhood and progressed slowly (29).

Determining the causality of KIF1A variants can be challenging in patients with adult-onset, slow progression, or neuropathy. These features are not typically associated with KAND, although they were reported previously (16, 30, 31). Moreover, the segregation analysis is often incomplete or unavailable for adults. Therefore, pathogenicity remains uncertain in patients #17 and #18.

Patients #1, #2, and #3 (son, mother, and maternal aunt) exhibited adult-onset spastic paraplegia (the son was in early adulthood ~20 years). The c.110T>C variant has been previously reported in an autosomal dominant SPG pedigree (32) and also de novo in a sporadic case (33); however, age at onset was not specified in either study.

Patient #4, who presented with axonal neuropathy (sporadic patient in the family), experienced the first symptoms in childhood (frequent tripping), with slow disease progression and a mild course. Neuropathies have been reported only rarely as a KAND phenotype (32, 34–36). We consider the variant c.232G>A in patient #4 to be causal because it has been reported as pathogenic, including de novo occurrence (9, 37), although the segregation analysis in the family is incomplete.

Interestingly, all patients in our cohort with a mild disease course (#1–#6) harbor variants located at the beginning of the motor domain (in our case, up to nucleotide c.499). Boyle et al. have previously reported that the specific localization within the motor domain may influence the severity of clinical manifestations (3). Rao et al. (20) showed that different amino acid substitutions are associated with different biophysical and clinical outcomes. Both the structural change and the properties of the substituted amino acid determine the extent of KIF1A motor dysfunction. These mutation-specific differences in KIF1A motility correlate with neurodevelopmental severity.

Truncating KIF1A variants have rarely been described as a cause of KAND. Only 14 truncating pathogenic KIF1A variants have been described [according to HGMD Profess., 07/2025]. They are more frequently localized outside the motor domain and are hypothesized as leading to haploinsufficiency or decreased final protein levels with a loss-of-function effect (opposite to the missense variant with dominant negative effect) (9, 19, 20, 31).

Patient #18 carries a truncating KIF1A variant c.3363_3364del together with a missense variant c.871G>A. We assume that only the truncating variant is pathogenic because the c.871G>A variant is present in the GnomAD v4.1 population database with a low frequency of 0.0007142% and has benign predictions. Nevertheless, an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance could also be considered (although the cis/trans position was not confirmed, since family members were not available for segregation analysis). An autosomal recessive inheritance has been reported rarely with hereditary sensoric neuropathy caused by KIF1A variants and only for truncating variants; all these variants were localized out of the kinesin motor domain (14, 16, 38).

4.2 Key considerations for assessing KIF1A variant causality

Assessing the causality of KIF1A variants is complex but essential for accurate genetic counselling and effective disease management. In our cohort, the pathogenicity of certain variants (e.g., c.499C>T, due to a healthy heterozygous carrier; c.110T>C, due to late onset and long-time lasting (years) segregation) remained uncertain for some time and was initially classified as unresolved. Conversely, several variants that initially appeared likely pathogenic were ultimately excluded based on one or several of these factors: lack of segregation, non-motor domain localization, benign predictions, or rather higher population frequency (unpublished data).

Based on the literature data, observed genotype–phenotype correlations, and our clinical experience, we propose a supportive algorithm with key considerations to aid in KIF1A variant classification and phenotype prediction. Although it overlaps partially with ACMG/AMP guidelines, it integrates gene-specific features and is intended as a practical, not definitive, interpretive tool (Table 4).

Table 4

Variant Missense Truncating
Presence in the motor domain Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
Frequency/allele count in GnomAD v4.1 total 0–5 alleles > 5 alleles 0–5 alleles > 5 alleles
Segregates with disease/de novo Yes No Yes No No (very likely) Yes No No (very likely)
Expected causality Likely pathogenic Uncertain compared with reported cases, age of onset can intrafamilially differ! Likely pathogenic Likely benign Likely benign Likely pathogenic Likely benign Likely benign
Most likely phenotype Complex phenotype/SPG pure or complex SPG SPG/neuropathy

Supportive algorithm with key considerations for assessing the causality of KIF1A variants (both AD and AR inheritance were considered, but missense variants were described only with AD).

SPG spastic paraplegia.

Key factors supporting causality include: (i) variant type (missense/truncating), (ii) localization within the motor domain, (iii) population frequency, (iv) de novo occurrence or segregation with disease, and (v) phenotype characteristics, including severity and age at onset. Most reported pathogenic variants are missense changes within the motor domain, typically associated with early onset and a more severe phenotype (see Supplementary material 2). In rare disorders such as KAND (mainly autosomal dominant), pathogenic variants are expected to be absent or extremely rare in population databases. For example, c.760C>T (p. R254W), identified in 20 of 177 KAND patients (14), is present in only 2 of 1,587,512 alleles in gnomAD v4.1 (in exomes only, which include data from some affected individuals).

Considering the causality in KIF1A, should following order (see Table 4):

  • Missense or truncating variant? The missense variant is more likely pathogenic, but for truncating variants, causality can also be considered.

  • Is the variant in the motor domain? The presence of missense variants in the motor domain further increases the likelihood of pathogenicity. For truncating variants, pathogenicity is not dependent on their presence in the domain.

  • Does the variant have a frequency in population databases? A zero frequency further increases the likelihood of causality. In cases of extremely low frequency (corresponding to an allele count of up to 5 alleles in gnomAD v4.1), causality can still be considered. In any case, extensive segregation analysis within the family is necessary. For variants with a frequency corresponding to more than five alleles in gnomAD v4.1, segregation analysis can also be performed, but it is very likely that the variant will not segregate and is likely benign.

  • Is the variant de novo or does it segregate with the disease? De novo variants and those that segregate with the disease are likely pathogenic. If the variant does not segregate with the disease but has already been reported as pathogenic and is a missense variant in the motor domain, causality remains uncertain, and the data from the literature must be carefully reviewed and considered. There may be significant intrafamilial variability in the onset of clinical signs.

  • Most likely phenotype: The expected phenotype depends on the type of variant and its location in the motor domain: Missense variant in the motor domain—expected phenotype ranges from complex with early onset (most likely), to pure spastic paraplegia with early or adult onset (likely), to neuropathy/other phenotypes (very rarely). Missense variant outside the motor domain and truncating variant—most likely phenotype is pure spastic paraplegia with either early or adult onset, followed by neuropathy/other phenotypes.

5 Conclusion

In summary, we describe the phenotype of 18 European patients with heterozygous variants in KIF1A, including two variants that have not been previously documented. In light of our findings from the patient genotype–phenotype correlation, we propose a pragmatic, systematic approach to facilitate the evaluation of the causality of KIF1A variants. This recommendation is based on the unique characteristics of the KIF1A gene, which impede the application of conventional ACMG classification protocols, which are designed to assess causality. This facilitates the more effective integration of genomic data into neurological clinical practice and precision medicine.

Statements

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Charles University, Second Faculty of Medicine, Prague, The Czech Republic and University Children’s Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.

Author contributions

AU: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft. EG: Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. PL: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing. KK: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. BS: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. AM: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing. AP: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. AT: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. EmV: Writing – review & editing. DG: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. EvV: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. VS: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. KS: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. AR: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. GS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. DS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic, grant no. NU22-04-00097 and MH CZ – DRO, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic 00064203 and Ministry of Health, Czech Republic – conceptual development of research organizations (FNBr, 65269705).

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1704209/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1.

    Okada Y Yamazaki H Sekine-Aizawa Y Hirokawa N . The neuron-specific kinesin superfamily protein KIF1A is a unique monomeric motor for anterograde axonal transport of synaptic vesicle precursors. Cell. (1995) 81:76980. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90538-3,

  • 2.

    Yonekawa Y Harada A Okada Y Funakoshi T Kanai Y Takei Y et al . Defect in synaptic vesicle precursor transport and neuronal cell death in KIF1A motor protein-deficient mice. J Cell Biol. (1998) 141:43141. doi: 10.1083/jcb.141.2.431,

  • 3.

    Boyle L Rao L Kaur S Fan X Mebane C Hamm L et al . Genotype and defects in microtubule-based motility correlate with clinical severity in KIF1A-associated neurological disorder. HGG Adv. (2021) 2:100026. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100026,

  • 4.

    Erlich Y Edvardson S Hodges E Zenvirt S Thekkat P Shaag A et al . Exome sequencing and disease-network analysis of a single family implicate a mutation in KIF1A in hereditary spastic paraparesis. Genome Res. (2011) 21:65864. doi: 10.1101/gr.117143.110,

  • 5.

    Klebe S Lossos A Azzedine H Mundwiller E Sheffer R Gaussen M et al . KIF1A missense mutations in SPG30, an autosomal recessive spastic paraplegia: distinct phenotypes according to the nature of the mutations. Eur J Hum Genet. (2012) 20:6459. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.261,

  • 6.

    Riviere JB Ramalingam S Lavastre V Shekarabi M Holbert S Lafontaine J et al . KIF1A, an axonal transporter of synaptic vesicles, is mutated in hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 2. Am J Hum Genet. (2011) 89:21930. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.06.013,

  • 7.

    Citterio A Arnoldi A Panzeri E Merlini L D’Angelo MG Musumeci O et al . Variants in KIF1A gene in dominant and sporadic forms of hereditary spastic paraparesis. J Neurol. (2015) 262:268490. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-7899-9,

  • 8.

    Ylikallio E Kim D Isohanni P Auranen M Kim E Lönnqvist T et al . Dominant transmission of de novo KIF1A motor domain variant underlying pure spastic paraplegia. Eur J Hum Genet. (2015) 23:142730. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.297,

  • 9.

    Pennings M Schouten MI van Gaalen J Meijer RPP de Bot ST Kriek M et al . KIF1A variants are a frequent cause of autosomal dominant hereditary spastic paraplegia. Eur J Hum Genet. (2020) 28:409. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0497-z,

  • 10.

    Langlois S Tarailo-Graovac M Sayson B Drögemöller B Swenerton A Ross CJD et al . De novo dominant variants affecting the motor domain of KIF1A are a cause of PEHO syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. (2016) 24:94953. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.217,

  • 11.

    Esmaeeli Nieh S Madou MRZ Sirajuddin M Fregeau B McKnight D Lexa K et al . De novo mutations in KIF1A cause progressive encephalopathy and brain atrophy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. (2015) 2:62335. doi: 10.1002/acn3.198,

  • 12.

    Hamdan FF et al . Excess of de novo deleterious mutations in genes associated with glutamatergic systems in nonsyndromic intellectual disability. Am J Hum Genet. (2011) 88:30616. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.02.001,

  • 13.

    Lee JR Srour M Kim D Hamdan FF Lim S-H Brunel-Guitton C et al . De novo mutations in the motor domain of KIF1A cause cognitive impairment, spastic paraparesis, axonal neuropathy, and cerebellar atrophy. Hum Mutat. (2015) 36:6978. doi: 10.1002/humu.22709,

  • 14.

    Sudnawa KK et al . Heterogeneity of comprehensive clinical phenotype and longitudinal adaptive function and correlation with computational predictions of severity of missense genotypes in KIF1A-associated neurological disorder. Genet Med. (2024) 26:101169. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101169,

  • 15.

    Vecchia SD Tessa A Dosi C Baldacci J Pasquariello R Antenora A et al . Monoallelic KIF1A-related disorders: a multicenter cross sectional study and systematic literature review. J Neurol. (2022) 269:43750. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10792-3,

  • 16.

    Ghafoor S Rafiq MA Abbas Shah ST Ansar M Paton T Ajmal M et al . KIF1A novel frameshift variant p.(Ser887Profs*64) exhibits clinical heterogeneity in a Pakistani family with hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type IIC. Int J Neurosci. (2024) 134:66575. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2022.2140428

  • 17.

    Nicita F Ginevrino M Travaglini L D'Arrigo S Zorzi G Borgatti R et al . Heterozygous KIF1A variants underlie a wide spectrum of neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. J Med Genet. (2021) 58:47583. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107007,

  • 18.

    Sack S Kull FJ Mandelkow E . Motor proteins of the kinesin family. Structures, variations, and nucleotide binding sites. Eur J Biochem. (1999) 262:111. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00341.x,

  • 19.

    Budaitis BG Jariwala S Rao L Yue Y Sept D Verhey KJ et al . Pathogenic mutations in the kinesin-3 motor KIF1A diminish force generation and movement through allosteric mechanisms. J Cell Biol. (2021) 220:227. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202004227,

  • 20.

    Rao L Li W Shen Y Chung WK Gennerich A . Distinct clinical phenotypes in KIF1A-associated neurological disorders result from different amino acid substitutions at the same residue in KIF1A. Biomolecules. (2025) 15:656. doi: 10.3390/biom15050656,

  • 21.

    Anazawa Y Kita T Iguchi R Hayashi K Niwa S . De novo mutations in KIF1A-associated neuronal disorder (KAND) dominant-negatively inhibit motor activity and axonal transport of synaptic vesicle precursors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2022) 119:e2113795119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2113795119,

  • 22.

    Gerasimavicius L Livesey BJ Marsh JA . Loss-of-function, gain-of-function and dominant-negative mutations have profoundly different effects on protein structure. Nat Commun. (2022) 13:3895. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31686-6,

  • 23.

    McKenna A Hanna M Banks E Sivachenko A Cibulskis K Kernytsky A et al . The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. (2010) 20:1297303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110,

  • 24.

    Karczewski KJ Francioli LC Tiao G Cummings BB Alföldi J Wang Q et al . The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature. (2020) 581:43443. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7,

  • 25.

    Richards S Aziz N Bale S Bick D Das S Gastier-Foster J et al . Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. (2015) 17:40524. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30,

  • 26.

    Cheng J Novati G Pan J Bycroft C Žemgulytė A Applebaum T et al . Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense. Science. (2023) 381:eadg7492. doi: 10.1126/science.adg7492,

  • 27.

    Stawinski P Ploski R . Genebe.net: implementation and validation of an automatic ACMG variant pathogenicity criteria assignment. Clin Genet. (2024) 106:11926. doi: 10.1111/cge.14516,

  • 28.

    Rudenskaya GE Kadnikova VA Ryzhkova OP Bessonova LA Dadali EL Guseva DS et al . KIF1A-related autosomal dominant spastic paraplegias (SPG30) in Russian families. BMC Neurol. (2020) 20:290. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01872-4,

  • 29.

    Gallagher A Fearon C Smith K Lynch T . Spastic paraplegia type 30 associated with levodopa-responsive parkinsonism. Mov Disord Clin Pract. (2023) 10:122830. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13815,

  • 30.

    Schuermans N Verdin H Ghijsels J Hellemans M Debackere E Bogaert E et al . Exome sequencing and multigene panel testing in 1,411 patients with adult-onset neurologic disorders. Neurol Genet. (2023) 9:e200071. doi: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000200071,

  • 31.

    Morikawa M Jerath NU Ogawa T Morikawa M Tanaka Y Shy ME et al . A neuropathy-associated kinesin KIF1A mutation hyper-stabilizes the motor-neck interaction during the ATPase cycle. EMBO J. (2022) 41:e108899. doi: 10.15252/embj.2021108899,

  • 32.

    Chen YJ Wang MV Dong EL Lin XH Wang N Zhang ZQ et al . Chinese patients with adrenoleukodystrophy and Zellweger spectrum disorder presenting with hereditary spastic paraplegia. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. (2019) 65:256260. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.06.008

  • 33.

    Dong EL Wang C Wu S Lu YQ Lin XH Su HZ et al . Clinical spectrum and genetic landscape for hereditary spastic paraplegias in China. Mol Neurodegener. (2018) 13:36. doi: 10.1186/s13024-018-0269-1,

  • 34.

    Hartley T Wagner JD Warman-Chardon J Tétreault M Brady L Baker S et al . Whole-exome sequencing is a valuable diagnostic tool for inherited peripheral neuropathies: outcomes from a cohort of 50 families. Clin Genet. (2018) 93:3019. doi: 10.1111/cge.13101,

  • 35.

    Herman I Lopez MA Marafi D Pehlivan D Calame DG Abid F et al . Clinical exome sequencing in the diagnosis of pediatric neuromuscular disease. Muscle Nerve. (2021) 63:30410. doi: 10.1002/mus.27112

  • 36.

    Tomaselli PJ Rossor AM Horga A Laura M Blake JC Houlden H et al . A de novo dominant mutation in KIF1A associated with axonal neuropathy, spasticity and autism spectrum disorder. J Peripher Nerv Syst. (2017) 22:4603. doi: 10.1111/jns.12235,

  • 37.

    Mereaux JL Banneau G Papin M Coarelli G Valter R Raymond L et al . Clinical and genetic spectra of 1550 index patients with hereditary spastic paraplegia. Brain. (2022) 145:102937. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab386,

  • 38.

    Krenn M Zulehner G Hotzy C Rath J Stogmann E Wagner M et al . Hereditary spastic paraplegia caused by compound heterozygous mutations outside the motor domain of the KIF1A gene. Eur J Neurol. (2017) 24:7417. doi: 10.1111/ene.13279,

Summary

Keywords

KIF1A-associated neurological disorder, spastic paraplegia, neuropathy, neurodegeneration, KIF1A pathogenic variants

Citation

Uhrova Meszarosova A, Galiart E, Lassuthova P, Kolokotronis K, Seidl B, Musilova A, Peckova A, Takacsova A, Vyhnalkova E, Grecmalova D, Vlckova E, Skutilova V, Steindl K, Rauch A, Stettner GM and Safka Brozkova D (2026) Genotype–phenotype correlations in 18 European patients with heterozygous KIF1A variants: key considerations for assessing KIF1A variant causality. Front. Med. 12:1704209. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1704209

Received

12 September 2025

Revised

01 December 2025

Accepted

03 December 2025

Published

08 January 2026

Volume

12 - 2025

Edited by

Winona Tse, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States

Reviewed by

Ayuko Iverson, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States

Arne Gennerich, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Dana Safka Brozkova,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics