Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Med.

Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology

This article is part of the Research TopicPerioperative Management and Clinical Challenges in Elderly Major Surgical PatientsView all 7 articles

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of desflurane versus sevoflurane on postoperative cognitive function and early recovery quality in elderly orthopedic patients: A prospective, randomized controlled trial

Provisionally accepted
Ranran  DongRanran Dong1Jing  LiJing Li1Xiangbin  JiXiangbin Ji1Cunjian  SongCunjian Song1Chunguang  RenChunguang Ren2Qingzhi  ZhangQingzhi Zhang1*
  • 1Liaocheng Infectious Disease Hospital, Liaocheng, China
  • 2Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: Desflurane is the most commonly suitable volatile anesthetic for elderly patients due to its low blood solubility, suggesting faster induction and awakening time. This study compared the safety and efficacy of desflurane versus sevoflurane in terms of postoperative cognitive function and early recovery quality in elderly orthopedic patients. Methods: Eighty elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery were included in this prospective, randomized controlled trial. After preoxygenation with a 5 L/min fresh oxygen flow via a facial mask for 5 min, anesthesia was induced using 0.2 μg/kg sufentanil, 1-2 mg/kg etomidate, and 0.2 mg/kg cisatracurium. General anesthesia was maintained through continuous infusion of remifentanil (0.05-0.20 μg/kg/min) and a sevoflurane expiratory concentration of 1-2% or desflurane 2-5%, in combination with air containing 40% oxygen to maintain bispectral index (BIS) values 40-60. Data collected included hemodynamic parameters, time to eye-opening, extubation, following commands, orientation, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay, opioid consumption, patient and surgeon satisfaction scores, number of patients willing to repeat surgery with the same anesthesia regimen, and adverse events. Additionally, white blood cell counts, percentages of neutrophils and lymphocytes, and troponin I levels were recorded at baseline and 24 h post-surgery. Results: The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores were lower at 1 h post-surgery in the D group although the difference was not clinically significant (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in MMSE scores at baseline, 6, 24, or 48 h post-surgery between the groups (P > 0.05). Patients in the D group recovered significantly faster, indicated by shorter times to eye-opening, extubation, following commands, and reduced PACU length of stay (P < 0.05). Patient and surgeon satisfaction scores and number of patients willing to repeat surgery with the same sedation regimen were significantly higher in the 3 D group (P < 0.05), whereas white blood cell counts and percentage of neutrophils were significantly lower 24 h post-surgery in the D group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Desflurane was not associated with reduced MMSE scores or postoperative respiratory complications. However, it demonstrated faster recovery times and higher patient satisfaction scores than sevoflurane.

Keywords: Desflurane, sevoflurane, elderly patients, orthopedic surgery, postoperative cognitive function, early recovery quality

Received: 17 Sep 2025; Accepted: 13 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Dong, Li, Ji, Song, Ren and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Qingzhi Zhang, 15339942816@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.