Xiao-yin Lin
Kan Zhang- Department of Anesthesiology, Yan’an People’s Hospital, Yan’an, China
Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) has emerged as a pivotal advancement in geriatric anesthesia, significantly enhancing procedural precision and patient safety through dynamic, real-time sonographic visualization. This technology overcomes critical limitations of conventional landmark-based techniques by enabling accurate needle navigation and localized anesthetic delivery, thereby improving block success rates while reducing volume requirements and systemic exposure. In elderly populations, characterized by heightened vulnerability to pharmacological adverse events and perioperative complications, UGRA facilitates opioid-minimized analgesia, attenuates neuroinflammatory responses, and lowers the incidence of delirium and cognitive dysfunction. Its alignment with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols further promotes early mobilization and functional recovery. Despite existing challenges in technical training and resource allocation, ongoing innovations in imaging artificial intelligence, sustained-release local anesthetics, and personalized protocols hold substantial potential to broaden its applications. Future integration of UGRA into perioperative care necessitates standardized competency-based training and rigorously designed multicenter clinical trials to consolidate its role in improving outcomes for the aging surgical population.
1 Introduction
1.1 The new normal of surgical anesthesia in an aging wave
The global demographic landscape is shifting irreversibly toward an aging population, creating a new normal in surgical practice where elderly patients represent a rapidly expanding cohort (1, 2). This demographic transition poses unique anesthetic challenges due to the confluence of multiple factors: a high prevalence of comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and renal insufficiency; a progressive decline in physiological functional reserve; and significant alterations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (1, 2). These age-related physiological changes collectively heighten the vulnerability of older adults to perioperative complications, demanding a critical reevaluation of standard anesthetic protocols to meet their distinct needs (3, 4).
1.2 Limitations of conventional anesthetic techniques
Traditional anesthetic modalities demonstrate considerable shortcomings in this vulnerable population. General anesthesia, while indispensable for many procedures, is associated with a higher incidence of deleterious outcomes in the elderly, including postoperative delirium (POD), postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), prolonged respiratory depression, and hemodynamic instability (4, 5). Similarly, conventional landmark-based or paresthesia-seeking nerve block techniques are hampered by their inherent unpredictability (6–8). These blind approaches often result in inconsistent success rates, necessitate higher volumes of local anesthetic, and carry an inherent risk of complications such as nerve injury, intravascular injection, and systemic local anesthetic toxicity (6, 7). These limitations can impede early mobilization, increase fall risk, and ultimately prolong hospital recovery.
1.3 The rise of precision anesthesia and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) philosophy
In response to these challenges, the paradigms of precision anesthesia and ERAS have gained paramount importance (9, 10). These collaborative, evidence-based frameworks advocate for tailored perioperative management strategies designed to minimize physiological stress and accelerate convalescence (9, 10). A core tenet is the implementation of multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia to facilitate early ambulation and functional recovery (10, 11). Within this modern approach, Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) has emerged as a transformative technology that enables this essential paradigm shift toward precision medicine (12).
1.4 Purpose and framework of this perspective
This perspective study aims to provide a comprehensive critical appraisal of the integral role of UGRA in modern geriatric anesthesia. It will methodically review the current evidence base, analyze the mechanistic foundations for its enhanced safety and efficacy profile, and explore future directions and technological advancements. The objective is to synthesize existing knowledge to inform clinical practice and guide future research. It is expressly stated that this article is a scholarly review and perspective; it does not report original research data but rather offers an informed analysis of the established literature.
2 Advantages in precision: the technological revolution from “blind exploration” to “real-time visualization”
The implementation of UGRA constitutes a paradigm shift from dependence on anatomical landmarks and subjective patient feedback to objective, image-guided precision (7, 13). This technological advancement has fundamentally transformed the execution of peripheral nerve blocks, offering unparalleled accuracy that is particularly valuable in elderly patients with altered anatomy and physiology.
2.1 Core contributions of visualization technology
The fundamental advancement of UGRA lies in its capacity to provide dynamic anatomical visualization. High-resolution ultrasound imaging enables direct identification of neural structures, surrounding vasculature, needle trajectory, and crucially, the real-time distribution of local anesthetic (14–16). This visual confirmation eliminates dependence on surrogate endpoints such as paresthesia or loss of resistance, which prove particularly unreliable in elderly patients due to frequent pre-existing neuropathies and tissue changes (6, 16). Consequently, UGRA demonstrates significantly improved first-attempt success rates while reducing the number of needle redirections needed (6, 15). The direct visualization of adequate perineural spread provides immediate confirmation of block efficacy, enhancing procedural confidence.
2.2 Dose precision and medication minimization
UGRA enables a sophisticated approach to dose optimization through direct visual confirmation of local anesthetic spread. This capability permits the use of significantly reduced volumes and concentrations of local anesthetic while maintaining blockade efficacy (17–19). This precision dosing carries particular importance in geriatric patients (18). The application of lower-concentration solutions provides effective sensory analgesia while preserving motor function, thereby facilitating early mobilization and reducing fall risk following lower extremity blocks (17, 18, 20). Additionally, reducing the total drug mass administered decreases the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity—a critical safety consideration in older patients with potentially impaired metabolic function and reduced plasma protein binding (17, 18).
2.3 Overcoming anatomical variations
Age-related anatomical changes present substantial challenges to conventional nerve localization techniques (21–23). Common alterations include tissue plane obscuration from loss of fascial integrity, fat infiltration that modifies sonographic appearance, and degenerative skeletal changes that displace traditional landmarks (21–23). UGRA provides the unique capability to dynamically navigate these variations through real-time anatomical assessment (22, 23). The operator can adapt needle positioning based on direct visualization, accurately identifying neural structures despite echogenic adipose tissue and avoiding aberrant vasculature (6, 15, 22). This dynamic adaptation ensures consistent procedural accuracy and enhances patient safety despite anatomical variability.
3 Safety advantages: multidimensional enhancement of patient outcomes
UGRA offers a superior safety profile that extends beyond procedural success to encompass comprehensive improvements in perioperative care, particularly for vulnerable geriatric patients (6, 24).
3.1 Reduction of systemic complications
UGRA significantly mitigates systemic risks by providing effective regional analgesia that frequently eliminates the necessity for general anesthesia or profound sedation. This approach avoids endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, thereby reducing pulmonary complications such as atelectasis, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and hypoventilation—especially critical for elderly patients with diminished respiratory reserve (25). Furthermore, by delivering targeted pain control, UGRA produces a substantial opioid-sparing effect (26, 27). This reduction in opioid consumption directly decreases the incidence of related adverse effects including postoperative nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression, gastrointestinal dysmotility, and the potential for persistent opioid use (26, 28).
3.2 Mitigation of neurological injury risk
While serious neurological injury remains uncommon in regional anesthesia, UGRA enhances procedural safety through continuous visual guidance. Real-time visualization enables precise needle navigation, maintaining a safe distance from neural structures and minimizing the risk of intraneural injection or mechanical trauma (29, 30). The ability to monitor needle trajectory and observe low-resistance injection patterns provides an additional safety mechanism not available in landmark-based techniques, substantially reducing the potential for iatrogenic nerve injury (30–32).
3.3 Central nervous system protection
UGRA provides notable neuroprotective benefits through multimodal mechanisms. Excellent regional analgesia attenuates surgical stress response and prevents pain-mediated neuroinflammation, both implicated in cognitive decline (33–35). Importantly, the reduction in opioid administration is particularly valuable for elderly patients, as opioids contribute to delirium through multiple pathways including neuroinflammation, neurotransmitter dysregulation, and sleep architecture disruption (34, 35). By minimizing opioid exposure and maintaining physiological homeostasis, UGRA represents a strategic approach to reducing the incidence and severity of POD and POCD (34, 35).
3.4 Facilitation of functional recovery and early discharge
UGRA aligns seamlessly with ERAS protocols by promoting accelerated functional recovery. Targeted analgesic techniques that preserve motor function (e.g., selective sensory blocks) enable early ambulation and participation in rehabilitation activities (36). Maintained motor strength, particularly following lower extremity procedures, reduces fall risk and enhances mobility (37). This combination of effective analgesia, preserved function, and minimized opioid-related complications contributes significantly to reduced hospital length of stay, decreased healthcare costs, and improved patient satisfaction—core objectives in contemporary geriatric perioperative management (38, 39).
3.5 Comparative summary of UGRA and traditional anesthetic techniques
A comparative summary of UGRA and traditional landmark-based techniques for elderly patients is presented in Table 1. UGRA demonstrates enhanced procedural precision, which contributes to reduced local anesthetic requirements, diminished systemic toxicity risk, and improved outcomes regarding perioperative neurocognitive disorders. Conversely, the landmark-based approach poses challenges due to anatomical variability and correlates with a higher incidence of complications.
Table 1. Comparison between UGRA and traditional landmark-based techniques in elderly patients.
3.6 UGRA’S multi-pathway reduction of POD/POCD
To elucidate the neuroprotective mechanisms underlying UGRA in elderly surgical patients, Figure 1 presents an integrative schematic of its multi-pathway effects on POD and POCD. UGRA provides precise regional analgesia that substantially reduces perioperative opioid requirements, thereby minimizing opioid-induced neurotoxicity, sleep architecture disruption, and neurotransmitter imbalance. In parallel, UGRA attenuates the surgical stress response by modulating autonomic and neuroendocrine activity, leading to decreased systemic inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Moreover, UGRA mitigates neuroinflammation by preserving blood–brain barrier integrity, limiting microglial activation, and maintaining cerebral homeostasis. Collectively, these coordinated mechanisms converge to preserve neuronal function and cognitive integrity, thereby reducing the overall risk of POD and POCD in the elderly population.
Figure 1. Multimodal mechanisms for UGRA-mediated risk reduction of POD/POCD.
4 Current challenges and limitations in clinical application
Notwithstanding its established benefits, the broader adoption and implementation of UGRA encounter several practical and evidence-based challenges that merit critical examination.
4.1 Learning curve and disparities in technical dissemination
Achieving clinical proficiency in UGRA necessitates specialized training that extends beyond conventional anesthetic techniques (40). Clinicians must develop competencies in sonographic anatomy interpretation, hand-eye coordination for real-time needle guidance, and the interpretation of dynamic tissue imaging (41). This complex skill acquisition presents a substantial learning curve that requires structured educational programs and supervised clinical experience (40, 41). Significant disparities exist in resource allocation and training opportunities between academic medical centers and community hospitals, creating geographical and institutional inequalities in access to advanced regional anesthesia services (41, 42). Addressing these gaps requires the development of standardized competency-based curricula and increased utilization of simulation-based training modalities.
4.2 Application in anatomically challenging populations
Certain patient populations present unique technical challenges for ultrasound-guided approaches. Patients with extreme obesity (class II/III) demonstrate significant ultrasound beam attenuation due to adipose tissue, resulting in diminished image resolution and difficulty visualizing deep neural structures (43). Those with severe spinal deformities (e.g., advanced kyphoscoliosis) or extensive prior surgical interventions may present with fundamentally altered anatomical relationships that complicate standard imaging planes and needle trajectories (44, 45). In such clinical scenarios, adjunct techniques including neurostimulation, alternative transducer positioning strategies, or hybrid approaches may be necessary to maintain procedural safety and efficacy (45–47).
4.3 Comprehensive health economic evaluation
The initial capital investment required for high-resolution ultrasound equipment and ongoing maintenance costs represent tangible economic considerations (48). However, a more comprehensive health economic analysis should account for the potential for downstream resource utilization reductions (49). By potentially decreasing complication rates, reducing opioid-related adverse effects, facilitating earlier functional recovery, and shortening hospital length of stay, UGRA may demonstrate favorable cost-effectiveness ratios (49, 50). Future economic evaluations should incorporate long-term outcome measures and total episode-of-care costing to provide more robust evidence regarding its value-based proposition (49).
4.4 Critical appraisal of current evidence quality
While the evidence base supporting UGRA continues to expand, it remains essential to acknowledge methodological limitations within the existing literature. Many studies constitute single-center investigations with limited sample sizes, potentially constraining their statistical power and generalizability (51, 52). There persists a need for larger, multi-institutional randomized controlled trials utilizing standardized outcome measures and extended follow-up periods (52, 53). Particularly needed are investigations examining the impact of UGRA on persistent postoperative outcomes including chronic pain development and long-term functional recovery in elderly surgical patients (53).
Future studies must urgently address key methodological challenges to enhance the validity of UGRA research. First, although blinding patients and outcome assessors is feasible, blinding the operator remains difficult due to the procedural nature of UGRA. Therefore, trials should incorporate independent pain management teams and ensure outcome assessors are masked to group allocation to minimize performance and detection bias. Second, standardizing primary outcome measures through consensus is critical. A core outcome set should include postoperative pain scores at rest and during movement, total opioid consumption within defined periods, and long-term cognitive function—such as POCD incidence assessed at 3 months postoperatively using validated neuropsychological batteries. Adopting such standards will enable meaningful cross-study comparisons and data pooling, facilitating a comprehensive evaluation of UGRA’s effects in elderly patients.
5 Future directions: technological convergence and conceptual evolution
The ongoing advancement of UGRA is poised to transform perioperative care for elderly patients through the integration of emerging technologies and refined clinical methodologies.
5.1 Intelligent system integration
Future progress will center on sophisticated technological integration to augment procedural precision and operational efficiency. Artificial intelligence algorithms capable of real-time anatomical segmentation offer potential for automated nerve identification, optimized needle path planning, and predictive modeling of local anesthetic dispersion (54). For instance, convolutional neural networks can be trained to accurately differentiate neural structures from adjacent tissues in ultrasound imaging, thereby offering real-time, intelligent decision support to clinicians. Such developments could reduce inter-operator variability and enhance procedural standardization (55). Concurrently, augmented reality navigation systems that project processed ultrasound data directly onto the patient’s anatomical field may fundamentally transform spatial orientation during block performance (55). These advanced interfaces promise to diminish the cognitive load associated with traditional ultrasound interpretation and improve technical accessibility.
5.2 Advanced pharmaceutical formulations
Innovations in drug delivery systems present new opportunities for extending therapeutic benefits. Sustained-release local anesthetic preparations, particularly liposome-encapsulated formulations, demonstrate potential to provide prolonged analgesia lasting up to 96 h following single administration (56–58). Such extended duration could obviate the need for catheter-based continuous infusion techniques in many clinical scenarios, thereby reducing associated infectious risks and simplifying postoperative care while maintaining effective opioid-sparing analgesia (56, 58).
5.3 Personalized protocol development
Future investigations should prioritize the development of tailored analgesic strategies based on individual physiological characteristics. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies establishing optimal drug selection and dosage regimens for patients with age-related comorbidities (e.g., hepatic impairment, cardiac dysfunction) are critically needed (59, 60). Furthermore, rigorous comparative effectiveness research evaluating multimodal adjunct combinations—including α-2 agonists, anti-inflammatory agents, and other non-opioid analgesics—will provide evidence-based guidance for optimizing therapeutic ratios and enhancing recovery quality (61, 62).
5.4 Expansion of clinical applications
The therapeutic scope of UGRA is likely to expand beyond conventional perioperative boundaries. Its implementation in emergency settings for acute trauma management offers significant potential for improving pain control while avoiding systemic opioid administration in fragile elderly patients (63, 64). Additionally, exploration of its application in chronic pain conditions, particularly neuropathic pain syndromes prevalent in aging populations, represents a promising research direction (65, 66). The integration of ultrasound-guided techniques into palliative care protocols may also provide effective minimally invasive options for managing cancer-related and end-of-life pain, thereby improving overall quality of care (67, 68).
6 Summary
UGRA has fundamentally transformed perioperative care for elderly patients by establishing new standards of precision and safety in regional anesthetic techniques. Its capacity to provide direct anatomical visualization and controlled pharmacological delivery embodies the core principles of contemporary precision medicine. The clinical significance of UGRA is particularly evident in its dual capacity to mitigate central nervous system complications through reduced neuroinflammatory responses and to facilitate substantial opioid minimization while maintaining effective analgesia. To fully optimize implementation and outcomes, subsequent initiatives must prioritize technological refinement, the establishment of standardized proficiency-based training pathways, and the execution of rigorously designed multicenter clinical trials. Through these advancements, UGRA will continue to evolve as an indispensable component of geriatric perioperative medicine, ultimately enhancing care quality and recovery outcomes for the expanding population of aging surgical patients.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
X-yL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Y-mY: Conceptualization, Data curation, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YL: Conceptualization, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Q-qD: Conceptualization, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KZ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Abbreviations
UGRA, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia; ERAS, enhanced recovery after surgery; POD, postoperative delirium; POCD, postoperative cognitive dysfunction.
References
1. Staheli, B, and Rondeau, B. Anesthetic considerations in the geriatric population In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing (2025)
2. Shetti, AN, Bhavar, T, and Khunt, M. Geriatric anesthesia: challenges and recent updates a review. Ann Geriatr Educ Med Sci. (2025) 11:34–8. doi: 10.18231/j.agems.2024.009
3. Gong, S, Qian, D, Riazi, S, Chung, F, Englesakis, M, Li, Q, et al. Association between the FRAIL scale and postoperative complications in older surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. (2023) 136:251–61. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006272
4. Vacas, S, Cole, DJ, and Cannesson, M. Cognitive decline associated with anesthesia and surgery in older patients. JAMA. (2021) 326:1509–10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4773
5. Somnuke, P, Srishewachart, P, Jiraphorncharas, C, Khempetch, A, Weeranithan, J, Suraarunsumrit, P, et al. Early postoperative neurocognitive complications in elderly patients: comparing those with and without preexisting mild cognitive impairment–a prospective study. BMC Geriatr. (2024) 24:84. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04663-5
6. Wang, R, Ju, J, and Pang, X. Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in elderly surgical patients: a meta-analysis. Front Med. (2025) 12:1580172. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1580172
7. Shah, A, Morris, S, Alexander, B, McKissack, H, Jones, JR, Tedder, C, et al. Landmark technique vs ultrasound-guided approach for posterior tibial nerve block in cadaver models. Indian J Orthop. (2020) 54:38–42. doi: 10.1007/s43465-019-00012-6
8. Pentsou, J, Hoey, S, Vagias, M, Guy, B, and Huuskonen, V. Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus anatomical landmark-guided thoracolumbar retrolaminar techniques in canine cadavers. Animals. (2023) 13:3045. doi: 10.3390/ani13193045
9. Mancel, L, Van Loon, K, and Lopez, AM. Role of regional anesthesia in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. (2021) 34:616–25. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001048
10. Harloff, MT, Vlassakov, K, Sedghi, K, Shorten, A, Percy, ED, Varelmann, D, et al. Efficacy of opioid-sparing analgesia after median sternotomy with continuous bilateral parasternal subpectoral plane blocks. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2024) 167:2157–2169.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.02.018
11. Yuan, Z, Liu, J, Jiao, K, Fan, Y, and Zhang, Y. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block improve opioid-sparing perioperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung lesion resection: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Transl Pediatr. (2022) 11:706–14. doi: 10.21037/tp-22-118
12. Marhofer, P, and Chan, VW. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: current concepts and future trends. Anesth Analg. (2007) 104:1265–9. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000260614.32794.7b
13. Torrano, V, Anastasi, S, Balzani, E, Barbara, E, Behr, AU, Bosco, M, et al. Enhancing safety in regional anesthesia: guidelines from the Italian Society of Anesthesia, analgesia, resuscitation and intensive care (SIAARTI). J Anesth Analg Crit Care. (2025) 5:26. doi: 10.1186/s44158-025-00245-y
14. Wadhwa, A, Kandadai, SK, Tongpresert, S, Obal, D, and Gebhard, RE. Ultrasound guidance for deep peripheral nerve blocks: a brief review. Anesthesiol Res Pract. (2011) 2011:262070. doi: 10.1155/2011/262070
15. Vlassakov, K, Vafai, A, Ende, D, Patton, ME, Kapoor, S, Chowdhury, A, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of ultrasonographic visualization of proximal intercostal block vs paravertebral block. BMC Anesthesiol. (2020) 20:13. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-0929-x
16. Robards, C, Clendenen, S, and Greengrass, R. Intravascular injection during ultrasound-guided axillary block: negative aspiration can be misleading. Anesth Analg. (2008) 107:1754–5. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818454ec
17. Donatiello, V, Alfieri, A, Mazza, MC, Buonavolontà, P, Scalvenzi, A, Prisco, E, et al. PENG block in elderly patients with hip fracture: less is more? a prospective observational monocentric study. J Anesth Analg Crit Care. (2025) 5:46. doi: 10.1186/s44158-025-00265-8
18. Fenten, MG, Schoenmakers, KP, Heesterbeek, PJ, Scheffer, GJ, and Stienstra, R. Effect of local anesthetic concentration, dose and volume on the duration of single-injection ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block with mepivacaine: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. (2015) 15:130. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0110-0
19. Luo, J, Cai, G, Ling, D, Zhang, N, Chen, X, Cao, X, et al. Mean effective volume of local anesthetics by nerve conduction technique. Ann Transl Med. (2020) 8:174. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.96
20. Zhao, XY, Zhang, EF, Bai, XL, Cheng, ZJ, Jia, PY, Li, YN, et al. Ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerve block with dexmedetomidine combined with low concentrations of ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in elderly knee arthroplasty. Med Princ Pract. (2019) 28:457–62. doi: 10.1159/000500261
21. Caballero-Lozada, AF, Sakamoto-T, G, CarreñoMedina, D, Pantoja, MF, Velásquez, F, and Velásquez, A. Ultrasound-guided neuraxial anesthesia versus the use of anatomical landmarks in the elderly: prospective cohort study. Colomb J Anesthesiol. (2024) 52:e1116. doi: 10.5554/22562087.e1116
22. Qu, B, Chen, L, Zhang, Y, Jiang, M, Wu, C, Ma, W, et al. Landmark-guided versus modified ultrasound-assisted paramedian techniques in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for elderly patients with hip fractures: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. (2020) 20:248. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01172-x
23. Li, L, Tao, W, and Cai, X. Ultrasound-guided vs. landmark-guided lumbar puncture for obese patients in emergency department. Front Surg. (2022) 9:874143. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.874143
24. Tsai, TY, Cheong, KM, Su, YC, Shih, MC, Chau, SW, Chen, MW, et al. Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block in geriatric patients with hip fracture in the emergency department. J Clin Med. (2022) 11:2778. doi: 10.3390/jcm11102778
25. Feng, J, Tang, G, Shui, Y, Xiang, J, and Qin, Z. Effects of ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus and sacral plexus block combined with general anesthesia on the anesthetic efficacy and surgical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing intertrochanteric fracture surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res. (2024) 19:171. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04469-y
26. Wu, EB, Hsiao, CC, Hung, KC, Hung, CT, Chen, CC, Wu, SC, et al. Opioid-sparing analgesic effects from interscalene block impact anesthetic management during shoulder arthroscopy: a retrospective observational study. J Pain Res. (2023) 16:119–28. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S397282
27. Zhao, L, and Qiu, D. Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block reduced the incidence of postoperative delirium after total knee arthroplasty: a double-blind, randomized study. Medicine. (2024) 103:e40549. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040549
28. Gibbs, CE, Ahmadzadeh, S, Shah, SS, Rodriguez, CE, Singh, A, Schwab, HM, et al. The influence of ultrasound-guided blocks for shoulder and knee surgeries on continued opioid use: a 6-month clinical review. J Clin Med. (2025) 14:4827. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144827
29. Sermeus, LA, Sala-Blanch, X, McDonnell, JG, Lobo, CA, Nicholls, BJ, van Geffen, GJ, et al. Ultrasound-guided approach to nerves (direct vs. tangential) and the incidence of intraneural injection: a cadaveric study. Anaesthesia. (2017) 72:461–9. doi: 10.1111/anae.13787
30. Sonawane, K, Dixit, H, Mehta, K, Thota, N, and Gurumoorthi, P. “Knowing it before blocking it,” the ABCD of the peripheral nerves: part C (prevention of nerve injuries). Cureus. (2023) 15:e41847. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41847
31. Munirama, S, Zealley, K, Schwab, A, Columb, M, Corner, GA, Eisma, R, et al. Trainee anesthetist diagnosis of intraneural injection-a study comparing B-mode ultrasound with the fusion of B-mode and elastography in the soft embalmed Thiel cadaver model. Br J Anaesth. (2016) 117:792–800. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew337
32. Liu, SS, YaDeau, JT, Shaw, PM, Wilfred, S, Shetty, T, and Gordon, M. Incidence of unintentional intraneural injection and postoperative neurological complications with ultrasound-guided interscalene and supraclavicular nerve blocks. Anaesthesia. (2011) 66:168–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06619.x
33. Li, T, Dong, T, Cui, Y, Meng, X, and Dai, Z. Effect of regional anesthesia on the postoperative delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Surg. (2022) 9:937293. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.937293
34. Khaled, M, Sabac, D, and Marcucci, M. Postoperative pain and pain management and neurocognitive outcomes after non-cardiac surgery: a protocol for a series of systematic reviews. Syst Rev. (2022) 11:280. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02156-3
35. Cheng, C, Wan, H, Cong, P, Huang, X, Wu, T, He, M, et al. Targeting neuroinflammation as a preventive and therapeutic approach for perioperative neurocognitive disorders. J Neuroinflammation. (2022) 19:297. doi: 10.1186/s12974-022-02656-y
36. Jenstrup, MT, Jæger, P, Lund, J, Fomsgaard, JS, Bache, S, Mathiesen, O, et al. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. (2012) 56:357–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02621.x
37. Lan, F, Chong, Y, Liu, F, and Wang, T. Single-injection adductor canal block enhances early mobilization with comparable analgesia to continuous infusion in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study. J Pain Res. (2025) 18:3851–8. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S512475
38. Xu, H, Wu, W, Chen, X, He, W, and Shi, H. Opioid-sparing effects of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled study. Perioper Med. (2024) 13:53. doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00413-8
39. Dam, M, Hansen, CK, Poulsen, TD, Azawi, NH, Wolmarans, M, Chan, V, et al. Transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy reduces opioid consumption and speeds ambulation and discharge from hospital: a single Centre randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. (2019) 123:e350–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.04.054
40. Ma, D, Chen, P, and Xu, J. Learning curve of ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block: a CUSUM pivotal analysis. Front Med. (2025) 12:1624205. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1624205
41. Resta, F, Barcella, B, Angeli, V, Lago, E, Santaniello, A, Dedato, AS, et al. Simulation-based training in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia for emergency physicians: insights from an Italian pre/post intervention study. BMC Med Educ. (2024) 24:1510. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06500-0
42. De Cassai, A, Behr, A, Bugada, D, Canzio, D, Capelleri, G, Costa, F, et al. Anesthesiologists ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia core curriculum: a Delphi consensus from Italian regional anesthesia experts. J Anesth Analg Crit Care. (2024) 4:54. doi: 10.1186/s44158-024-00190-2
43. De Cassai, A, Zarantonello, F, Pistollato, E, Pettenuzzo, T, Busetto, V, Sella, N, et al. Regional anesthesia in obese patients: challenges, considerations, and solutions. Saudi J Anaesth. (2025) 19:221–6. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_132_25
44. Yoshimura, M, and Morimoto, Y. Ultrasound-guided spinal anaesthesia for a patient with severe scoliosis. BMJ Case Rep. (2024) 17:e261112. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2024-261112
45. Jiang, Y, Wang, Y, Wang, F, He, T, Li, Q, Zhang, J, et al. Ultrasound-assisted spinal anesthesia in a parturient with scoliosis and moyamoya disease undergoing cesarean section: a case report. J Surg Case Rep. (2025) 2025:rjaf479. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaf479
46. Berde, C, Formanek, A, Khan, A, Camelo, CR, Koka, A, Riley, BL, et al. Transforaminal lumbar puncture for spinal anesthesia or novel drug administration: a technique combining C-arm fluoroscopy and ultrasound. Reg Anesth Pain Med. (2022) 47:380–3. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103242
47. Chin, KJ, Perlas, A, Chan, V, Brown-Shreves, D, Koshkin, A, and Vaishnav, V. Ultrasound imaging facilitates spinal anesthesia in adults with difficult surface anatomic landmarks. Anesthesiology. (2011) 115:94–101. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821a8ad4
48. Ponde, V, Borse, D, More, J, and Mange, T. Is dedicating an ultrasound machine to regional anesthesia an economically viable option? J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. (2016) 32:519–22. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.194767
49. Oliver-Fornies, P, Sánchez-Viñas, A, Gomez Gomez, R, Ortega Lahuerta, JP, Loscos-Lopez, D, Aragon-Benedi, C, et al. Cost analysis of low-volume versus standard-volume ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Cureus. (2023) 15:e38534. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38534
50. Ravindranath, S, Ranganath, YS, Backfish-White, K, Wolfe, J, and Adhikary, S. The role of regional anaesthesia and acute pain services in value-based healthcare. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. (2023) 51:450–8. doi: 10.4274/TJAR.2023.231478
51. Zhou, SL, Zhang, SY, Si, HB, and Shen, B. Regional versus general anesthesia in older patients for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. (2023) 18:428. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03903-5
52. Pasli, M, Tumin, D, and Guffey, R. Simulation-based analysis of trial design in regional anesthesia. Anesthesiol Res Pract. (2024) 2024:6651894. doi: 10.1155/2024/6651894
53. Zhao, Y, Guo, Y, Pan, X, Zhang, X, Yu, F, and Cao, X. The impact of different regional anesthesia techniques on the incidence of chronic post-surgical pain in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a network meta-analysis. Pain Ther. (2024) 13:1335–50. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00648-9
54. Delvaux, BV, Maupain, O, Giral, T, Bowness, JS, and Mercadal, L. Evaluation of AI-based nerve segmentation on ultrasound: relevance of standard metrics in the clinical setting. Br J Anaesth. (2025) 134:1497–502. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.12.040
55. Liao, SC, Shao, SC, Gao, SY, and Lai, EC. Augmented reality visualization for ultrasound-guided interventions: a pilot randomized crossover trial to assess trainee performance and cognitive load. BMC Med Educ. (2024) 24:1058. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05998-8
56. Panchamia, JK, Smith, HM, Sanchez-Sotelo, J, Vinsard, PA, Duncan, CM, Njathi-Ori, CW, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing mixed liposomal bupivacaine vs. continuous catheter for interscalene block during shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of analgesia, patient experience, and cost. J Shoulder Elb Surg. (2025) 34:2178–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.09.051
57. Chen, JJ, Wu, YC, Wang, JS, and Lee, CH. Liposomal bupivacaine administration is not superior to traditional periarticular injection for postoperative pain management following total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. (2023) 18:206. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03699-4
58. Baessler, AM, Moor, M, Conrad, DJ, Creighton, J, and Badman, BL. Single-shot liposomal bupivacaine reduces postoperative narcotic use following outpatient rotator cuff repair: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. (2020) 102:1985–92. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00225
59. Mercadante, S. Influence of aging on opioid dosing for perioperative pain management: a focus on pharmacokinetics. J Anesth Analg Crit Care. (2024) 4:51. doi: 10.1186/s44158-024-00182-2
60. Bosilkovska, M, Walder, B, Besson, M, Daali, Y, and Desmeules, J. Analgesics in patients with hepatic impairment: pharmacology and clinical implications. Drugs. (2012) 72:1645–69. doi: 10.2165/11635500-000000000-00000
61. Pankaj, K, and Rajan, PS. Alpha 2 agonists in regional anaesthesia practice: efficient yet safe? Indian J Anaesth. (2014) 58:681–3. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.147127
62. Desai, N, Albrecht, E, and El-Boghdadly, K. Perineural adjuncts for peripheral nerve block. BJA Educ. (2019) 19:276–82. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.05.001
63. Lee, HK, Kang, BS, Kim, CS, and Choi, HJ. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia for the pain management of elderly patients with hip fractures in the emergency department. Clin Exp Emerg Med. (2014) 1:49–55. doi: 10.15441/ceem.14.008
64. Malik, A, Thom, S, Haber, B, Sarani, N, Ottenhoff, J, Jackson, B, et al. Regional anesthesia in the emergency department: an overview of common nerve block techniques and recent literature. Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep. (2022) 10:54–66. doi: 10.1007/s40138-022-00249-w
65. Lin, TY, Chang, KV, Wu, WT, Mezian, K, Ricci, V, and Özçakar, L. Ultrasound-guided interventions for neuropathic pain: a narrative pictorial review. Life. (2025) 15:1404. doi: 10.3390/life15091404
66. Marrone, F, Pullano, C, De Cassai, A, and Fusco, P. Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks in chronic pain: a narrative review. J Anesth Analg Crit Care. (2024) 4:71. doi: 10.1186/s44158-024-00205-y
67. Fumić Dunkić, L, Hostić, V, and Kustura, A. Palliative treatment of intractable cancer pain. Acta Clin Croat. (2022) 61:109–14. doi: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.s2.14
Keywords: ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia, nerve block, geriatric anesthesia, postoperative cognitive dysfunction, enhanced recovery after surgery, precision, safety
Citation: Lin X-y, Yang Y-m, Liu Y, Dang Q-q and Zhang K (2025) Precision and safety advantages of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in geriatric anesthesia: current status and future prospects. Front. Med. 12:1709406. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1709406
Edited by:
Alice Chen, Consultant, Potomac, MD, United StatesReviewed by:
Huadong Ni, First Hospital of Jiaxing, ChinaCopyright © 2025 Lin, Yang, Liu, Dang and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kan Zhang, a2FuemhhbmcyMDAyQGhvdG1haWwuY29t