ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Translational Medicine
This article is part of the Research TopicLateral Ankle Sprain, Chronic Ankle Instability and Ankle Osteoarthritis: Unraveling Mechanisms and Exploring Management ApproachesView all 20 articles
CT-Based Subchondral Bone and Clinical Predictors of Long-Term Total Ankle Arthroplasty Outcomes
Provisionally accepted- Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao), Qingdao, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based predictive model for personalized long-term prognosis assessment in patients undergoing total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) by integrating preoperative Computed Tomography (CT)-derived subchondral bone structural parameters with clinical indicators. Methods: A retrospective cohort study involving 340 TAA patients was divided into training (n=238, 70%) and validation (n=102, 30%) sets through stratified random sampling, ensuring the outcome distribution was preserved. Radiographic features and clinical metrics were systematically collected. Univariate analysis was conducted to identify variables associated with poor prognosis in the training set, followed by feature reduction using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. To determine independent risk factors, multivariable COX proportional hazards regression (Cox regression) was employed. Three machine learning models—Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Gradient Boosting (GB)—were constructed using Python 3.8.5. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Baseline characteristics showed no statistically significant differences between training and validation sets (P>0.05). Univariate analysis indicated that subchondral bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), talar tilt angle, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and preoperative talar necrosis volume were significantly associated with the need for prosthesis revision surgery. In the multivariable COX regression, Tb.Sp, talar tilt angle, and preoperative talar necrosis volume emerged as independent risk factors for sustained clinical deterioration. Conversely, subchondral BMD and CCI were identified as protective factors. In the validation set, the area under the ROC (AUC) for the RF, SVM, and GB models were 0.897, 0.790, and 0.815, respectively. Pairwise comparisons using the DeLong test revealed a statistically significant difference in AUC between the RF and SVM models (ΔAUC=0.107, P=0.032) and between the RF and GB models (ΔAUC=0.082, P=0.041). In contrast, the difference between the SVM and GB models was not statistically significant (ΔAUC=0.025, P=0.597). Conclusion: The RF model that incorporates preoperative CT-quantified subchondral bone parameters and clinical indicators effectively predicts long-term adverse outcomes in TAA patients. The top three predictive features identified are subchondral BMD, Tb.Sp, and preoperative talar necrosis volume.
Keywords: Gradient boosting model, random forest model, Subchondral Bone, Support vector machine model, Total ankle arthroplasty
Received: 26 Sep 2025; Accepted: 22 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ji and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Deheng Liu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
