SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Med.
Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology
Global prevalence of frailty in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Emergency Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- 2Institute of Disaster Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- 3Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China
- 4Department of Emergency Medicine, West China Hospital, and Disaster Medical Center, Sichuan University, Wuhou District, 37 Guoxue Lane, Chengdu, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: The coexistence of frailty and hemodialysis is associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, including hospitalization, mortality, and falls. Although the estimated prevalence of frailty in hemodialysis patients is widely reported, the results vary significantly across the relevant literature. Currently, comprehensive evidence regarding the global prevalence of frailty among hemodialysis patients remains unknown. Objective: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, our primary objective was to determine the global prevalence of frailty among hemodialysis patients, while accounting for stratification by sample size, age, duration of hemodialysis, gender, publication year, diagnostic criteria, and region. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis Data Source: Cochrane Library, Medline, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), and Weipu Database (VIP) from inception to 15 June 2023. Methods: Original articles that evaluated the prevalence of frailty in hemodialysis patients were included. Data extraction and methodological quality assessment of the included studies were performed independently by two reviewers. The pooled prevalence of frailty was estimated using the random-effects model. Meta-regression analysis and subgroup analysis were undertaken to explore sources of heterogeneity. Results: A total of 64 studies from 10 different countries met the inclusion criteria, with a total sample of 23799 hemodialysis patients. The global pooled prevalence of frailty in hemodialysis patients was 39.6% (95%CI 35-44%), with significant heterogeneity across the various studies. The subgroup analysis results demonstrated that the prevalence of frailty among hemodialysis patients varied significantly based on sample size, age, duration of hemodialysis, gender, publication year, diagnostic criteria, and geographic region. Meta-regression showed that factors such as sample size, age, and gender independently emerged as predictors of frailty prevalence. Conclusions: High frailty prevalence was found in patients on hemodialysis, which may lead to poor health outcomes. The current analysis suggests that risk factors for frailty in hemodialysis patients should be further investigated in future studies, and early screening and interventions for frailty should be incorporated into the routine care of hemodialysis patients to reduce the negative impact of frailty.
Keywords: Frailty, hemodialysis, Meta-analysis, Prevalence, Systematic review
Received: 11 Oct 2025; Accepted: 04 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Xiang, Tong, Qian and Deng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Peng Deng
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
