You're viewing our updated article page. If you need more time to adjust, you can return to the old layout.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med., 14 January 2026

Sec. Nephrology

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1741853

A retrospective single-center cohort study of major subtypes of primary glomerular diseases (MN, IgAN, and MCD): clinical characteristics, prognostic outcomes, and risk factors

  • 1. Department of Nephrology, Shanxi Medical University Second Hospital, Taiyuan, China

  • 2. Shanxi Kidney Disease Institute, Taiyuan, China

  • 3. Institute of Nephrology, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China

  • 4. Department of Nephrology, Changzhi Medical College Affiliated Heji Hospital, Changzhi, China

  • 5. College of Computer Science and Cyber Security (Oxford Brookes College), Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China

Article metrics

View details

843

Views

72

Downloads

Abstract

Background:

This study aims to investigate patients with the three major types of primary glomerular diseases who underwent kidney biopsy at our center, with the objectives of characterizing their clinical phenotypes and pathological features, and identifying risk factors for clinical outcome events.

Methods:

Between January 2013 and December 2023, consecutive patients diagnosed with membranous nephropathy (MN), immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), and minimal change disease (MCD) by kidney biopsy were included in this retrospective follow-up study. Outcome measures included proteinuria remission and kidney disease progression events. Multivariate-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were utilized.

Results:

A total of 608 patients were included in the follow-up cohort, comprising 438 with MN, 110 with IgAN, and 60 with MCD. Clinical remission was achieved in 481 (79.1%) patients, including 333 (54.8%) with complete remission (CR) and 148 (24.3%) with partial remission (PR). Kidney disease progression occurred in 79 (13.0%) patients. After balancing for baseline data and pathological diagnoses in relation to different outcomes, 24-h urinary total protein (24 h-UTP; ≥ 3.5 g/d vs. < 3.5 g/d: HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10–1.64, p = 0.003), low-density lipoprotein (LDL; HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.86–0.96, p < 0.001), pathological diagnoses (MN vs. MCD: HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50–0.92, p = 0.011), and interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) were significantly associated with proteinuria remission. History of hypertension (HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.32–4.25, p = 0.004), and the presence of nodular mesangial sclerosis (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.01–3.16, p = 0.045) were identified as independent risk factors for kidney disease progression. A significant interaction was observed between disease duration and pathological diagnoses. Subgroup analysis indicated that longer disease duration was an independent risk factor for kidney disease progression in patients with MN (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.07, p = 0.013).

Conclusion:

Undertaken at a single center, this study outlines the spectrum of current treatments, clinical outcomes, and factors influencing these outcomes among patients newly diagnosed with the three principal glomerular diseases through kidney biopsy.

Introduction

Primary glomerulonephritis (PGN) is the most common kidney disease (1) and a leading cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) (2, 3). A notable decline was observed in the proportion of incident hemodialysis cases caused by glomerulonephritis (GN), falling from 51.3% in 2012 to 28.7% in 2022; nevertheless, GN persisted as the second most common etiology of ESKD (2). Distinct regional variations in the manifestations of glomerular diseases are observed. The incidence of immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is significantly higher in Asia (4, 5), whereas the spectrum in North America is characterized by a greater prevalence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) (3).

Analysis of kidney biopsy data from Chinese patients revealed that PGN continues to be the leading form of kidney disease. The detection rate of PGN among kidney biopsy patients was 66.92–71.10% (1, 6, 7). Among the various pathological diagnoses, IgAN showed the highest prevalence (42.30–48.88%), exceeding that of MN (20.67–28.55%), mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis (MsPGN, 11.30%), minimal change disease (MCD; 5.20–13.30%), and FSGS (6.50–16.79%). Compared to historical data, contemporary studies demonstrate a declining detection rate of both IgAN and MsPGN. This epidemiological transition mirrors the evolving landscape of glomerular diseases (characterized by increased MN prevalence) while simultaneously reflecting diagnostic advancements in distinguishing mesangial proliferative variants.

In the management of glomerular diseases, early identification of potential indicators of disease progression contributes to precision in diagnosis and treatment, delays disease progression, and improves prognosis. The assessment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is generally based on three key factors: etiology, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and urinary albumin level. Accordingly, a rational testing strategy should be adopted: in addition to the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (uPCR), 24-h urinary total protein (24 h-UTP) quantification should also be considered an essential measure (8). When evaluating the progression of renal function, eGFR formulas based on cystatin C are more sensitive than traditional creatinine-based formulas and can serve as an early detection tool for renal function decline (9). This approach should be combined with the measurement of validated novel biomarkers to enhance the effectiveness of early screening and dynamic monitoring (10–12). In terms of treatment, lifestyle modifications—including smoking cessation, salt restriction, weight reduction (13), and blood pressure control—should form the cornerstone, supplemented by an integrated therapeutic approach that combines Western medicine with multi-target traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), along with continuous monitoring of relevant clinical indicators.

General therapeutic principles for glomerular diseases integrate core supportive care with precise immunosuppression (14). The cornerstone of supportive care is the initiation of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) in all patients, which should be titrated to the maximum tolerated dose to achieve a systolic blood pressure under 120 mmHg and a proteinuria level below 1 g/day, acknowledging that specific targets vary by disease. For immunosuppression, the objectives are to prevent acute injury, halt disease progression, and minimize toxicity. The standard armamentarium includes glucocorticoids, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), rituximab (RTX), and cyclophosphamide (CTX). Critical safety protocols require pre-treatment screening for latent infections, ongoing drug concentration monitoring, and concomitant prophylactic strategies for bone and gastrointestinal protection, alongside fertility preservation as indicated.

Recent years have seen advances in research on TCM compounds for the treatment of glomerular diseases through multi-pathway mechanisms. For example, Dioscorea nipponica Makino has been shown to exert therapeutic effects in chronic kidney disease (CKD) by modulating pathways such as oxidative stress and inhibiting fibrosis (15). Meanwhile, other TCM agents and formulas—including Astragalus membranaceus, Tripterygium wilfordii, curcumin, and Zhenwu Decoction—focus more on repairing podocyte injury (16). Together, these studies illustrate the multi-target and multi-pathway characteristics of TCM interventions. However, there remains a lack of large-scale clinical trials and systematic toxicity data. Future research should further clarify their mechanisms of action and establish standardized clinical protocols.

The Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE) investigation revealed significant associations between clinical characteristics and complete proteinuria remission in patients with primary glomerular diseases. Key predictive factors included baseline proteinuria levels prior to kidney biopsy, histopathological classification, and immunosuppressive treatment regimens (17). Systematic analyses have been conducted regarding renal outcomes, including progression to ESKD or mortality, across different histological types of primary glomerulopathie (18–20). Nevertheless, comprehensive investigations into proteinuria remission patterns and their impact on renal function progression in Chinese patients with primary glomerular diseases remain substantially underexplored.

Utilizing a retrospective cohort design, this study investigates a single-center population with kidney biopsy-confirmed primary glomerular disease. By analyzing comprehensive clinical baseline and follow-up data, it seeks to elucidate the factors predictive of clinical proteinuria remission and kidney disease progression.

Methods

Study patients and follow-up cohort

This single-center retrospective study enrolled all consecutive patients who underwent kidney biopsy and were diagnosed with PGN at Changzhi Medical College Affiliated Heji Hospital, between January 2013 and December 2023. The indications for kidney biopsy are determined by clinicians based on disease characteristics and related guideline, and each patient has signed an informed consent form for kidney biopsy as well as a consent form for clinical follow-up. Renal pathological specimens were evaluated by KingMed Diagnostics, Guangzhou. Based on kidney biopsy findings, patients were categorized into the following groups: MN, IgAN, MCD, and other primary glomerulonephritides. Clinical diagnosis data were extracted from medical records coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10).

We retrieved patients diagnosed with GN who underwent kidney biopsy from our hospital’s medical record system and documented their pathological diagnoses and age at disease onset. The most recent laboratory results and demographic data prior to kidney biopsy were recorded as baseline characteristics. For patients enrolled in the cohort and regularly followed up at our hospital, follow-up data were collected at 1–3 month intervals for at least 1 year, with all follow-up measurements recorded. The final date for data collection was from December 20 to 31, 2024, during which all enrolled patients were subjected to follow-up and outcome confirmation, either on-site or through telephone. Additionally, every 3 months, we assessed and confirmed the following outcomes: proteinuria remission status, changes in eGFR, survival status (including death and progression to ESKD). We included only those patients for whom complete baseline and follow-up data were available.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Heji Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College (Approval No. 25–074) and was conducted in strict accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent for both clinical data collection and the kidney biopsy procedure was obtained as a single document prior to the kidney biopsy.

In line with the current Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines (14), MN is categorized into low, medium, high, and very high-risk groups according to 24 h-UTP and eGFR levels. For low-risk patients, follow-up observation or renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) therapy is recommended. Treatment for medium, high, and very high-risk patients involves corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressive/biologic agents, with the specific regimen determined by the treating clinician.

Following the established therapeutic protocols, enrolled patients were categorized into treatment and non-treatment groups. The treatment group was further divided into: RASi therapy and immunosuppressive therapy (IST). IST regimens consisted of glucocorticoids, immunosuppressive drugs, or targeted biologics, used either alone or in any combination. Specifically, immunosuppressive agents included CTX, CNIs (cyclosporine A, tacrolimus), hydroxychloroquine, tripterygium glycosides, and MMF, while rituximab (RTX) was the only biologic agent utilized within the scope of this study.

Clinical outcomes

In this longitudinal assessment, we evaluated two primary endpoints: proteinuria response and kidney progression events. Proteinuria outcomes were classified as follows: (1) Complete remission (CR): CR was characterized by a decrease in 24 h-UTP excretion to ≤ 0.3 g/day, along with normalized serum albumin levels and stable renal function; (2) Partial remission (PR): PR was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the 24 h-UTP ratio and a final excretion of ≤ 3.5 g/day; (3) Non-response (NR): NR was defined as 24 h-UTP remaining above 3.5 g/ day throughout follow-up, with a urinary protein reduction of less than 50%; (4) Relapse: Relapse was defined as new development of the 24 h-UTP > 3.5 g/d after CR or PR. Remission of proteinuria encompassed both CR and PR.

Kidney disease progression event was characterized by either: (i) ≥ 30% decline in eGFR over 24 months, or (ii) ESKD persisting ≥ 4 weeks (21). ESKD criteria included: commencement of maintenance dialysis, renal transplantation, or sustained eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2. The CKD-EPI creatinine-based formula was employed for GFR estimation (22).

Statistical analysis

Categorical data were presented as number (percentage) and compared using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous data were reported as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile) and compared using the t test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), or Kruskal-Wallis test.

Initially, univariate Cox proportional hazards regression was employed to screen potential predictors for the two defined events: proteinuria remission and kidney disease progression (coded as 1 for event occurrence, 0 for censoring). Subsequently, all clinically relevant variables that demonstrated statistical significance (p < 0.05) in the univariate analysis were deemed eligible for inclusion in the multivariate Cox models to obtain adjusted hazard ratios. The observation period spanned from the date of kidney biopsy to the occurrence of primary endpoints.

To account for heterogeneity among pathological diagnoses (MN, IgAN, MCD), we used an integrated approach: pathological diagnoses (as dummy variables) and all covariates were included in a multivariable Cox model in the overall cohort, with systematic testing of prespecified interactions between key variables and diagnoses. Significant interactions (p < 0.05) led to separate hazard ratio reporting by pathological subtype. Subgroup analyses by pathological diagnosis were also performed for a more complete view.

Time-to-event outcomes were visualized using Kaplan–Meier survival curves, with between-group differences evaluated by log-rank testing. All statistical tests were two-tailed, with α = 0.05 serving as the threshold for statistical significance. Data processing and statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 26.0; Armonk, NY, United States) and R (version 4.4.2).

Results

Study cohort

Between January 2013 and December 2023, a total of 1,185 consecutive patients underwent kidney biopsy. After excluding 344 patients who were lost to follow-up and 23 cases diagnosed with tubulointerstitial nephropathy, 818 patients were ultimately included in the follow-up study (Figure 1; Supplementary Table S1). Among these, 703 cases were diagnosed with primary glomerulopathy (PGN). The top three diseases within this category were MN (438 cases), IgAN (110 cases), and MCD (60 cases). Among the 95 patients with other types of PGN, FSGS was the most common, accounting for 47 cases in total (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Flowchart detailing the filtering process of 1,185 renal biopsy patients from January 2013 to December 2023. Initially, 367 patients were excluded: 344 without follow-up data and 23 with isolated lesions. Of the 818 with glomerular disease, 115 were further excluded due to low eGFR, consent barriers, or secondary glomerulopathy. This left 703 patients with primary glomerulopathy. They were categorized into 608 patients analyzed for kidney outcomes—MN (438), IgAN (110), MCD (60)—and 95 with other diagnoses, including FSGS, glomerulonephritis variants, TBMN, and Alport syndrome.

Flowchart of patient selection. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; IgAN, immunoglobulin A nephropathy; IgG4, immunoglobulin G4; MN, membranous nephropathy; MCD, minimal change disease; TBMN, thin basement membrane nephropathy.

Baseline characteristics were compared across different kidney pathological classifications, with detailed results presented in Table 1. In this study cohort, the mean age at kidney biopsy was 47 years, with 60.0% (422/703) of patients being male. Clinically, 67.6% (475/703) of biopsied patients presented with nephrotic syndrome (NS). Overall, among the three PGN, MN patients exhibited the oldest age at disease onset and the highest eGFR values, while IgAN patients demonstrated the lowest 24 h-UTP levels and highest serum albumin levels. Patients with MCD showed the highest total cholesterol and the lowest serum albumin levels. Histopathological comparisons revealed that MCD had the lowest incidence of renal arteriolar hyalinosis (10.0%), whereas IgAN demonstrated the highest frequencies of crescent formation (50.9%) and segmental glomerular mesangial sclerosis (52.7%).

Table 1

Characteristics Total MN IgAN MCD Othera p valueb
Patients, n 703 438 110 60 95
Male sex 422 (60.0) 259 (59.1) 67 (60.9) 37 (61.7) 59 (62.1) 0.94
Age at biopsy, years 47.0 (38.0, 56.0) 50.0 (41.8, 58.0) 38.0 (28.0, 51.0) 43.0 (27.0, 55.0) 44.0 (36.0, 56.0) <0.001
Duration of illness, months 11.0 (9.0, 13.0) 11.0 (9.0, 13.0) 9.0 (8.0, 12.0) 10.0 (8.0, 18.8) 12.0 (9.0, 15.0) <0.001
Follow-up duration 19.0 (14.0, 28.0) 18.0 (14.0, 27.0) 22.0 (16.0, 33.25) 16.5 (9.0, 29.0) 19.0 (14.0, 26.0)
Family history of kidney disease 18 (2.6) 10 (2.3) 0 0 8 (8.4) 0.001
Smoking history 231 (32.9) 141 (32.2) 36 (32.7) 27 (45.0) 27 (28.4) 0.18
Alcohol history 191 (27.2) 117 (26.7) 33 (30.0) 21 (35.0) 20 (21.1) 0.25
Clinical syndromedc <0.001
NS 475 (67.6) 346 (79.0) 46 (41.8) 46 (76.7) 37 (38.9)
AKI with NS 22 (3.1) 4 (0.9) 2 (1.8) 14 (23.3) 2 (2.1)
AKI without NS 8 (1.1) 2 (0.5) 4 (3.6) 0 2 (2.1)
Progressive CKD 57 (8.1) 14 (3.2) 10 (9.1) 0 33 (34.7)
Proteinuria 135 (19.2) 72 (16.4) 42 (38.2) 0 21 (22.1)
Isolated hematuria 6 (0.9) 0 6 (5.5) 0 0
Comorbidities
Hypertension 397 (56.5) 258 (58.9) 55 (50.0) 19 (31.7) 65 (68.4) <0.001
Diabetes mellitus 122 (17.4) 77 (17.6) 14 (12.7) 4 (6.7) 27 (28.4) 0.002
Systolic BP, mmHg 144.0 (130.0, 158.0) 146.0 (133.0, 160.0) 138.5 (127.0, 148.3) 133.5 (124.0, 148.0) 144.0 (132.0, 163.0) <0.001
Diastolic BP, mmHg 89.0 (80.0, 97.0) 90.0 (82.0, 99.0) 86.0 (76.8, 94.3) 86.5 (80.0, 91.8) 88.0 (80.0, 99.0) <0.001
BMI, kg/m2 25.2 (23.0, 27.9) 25.5 (23.4, 28.1) 26.1 (23.0, 28.3) 25.4 (22.6, 28.4) 23.8 (21.7, 25.1) <0.001
Hemoglobin, g/L 140.0 (125.0, 154.0) 142.0 (126.0, 154.0) 139.0 (120.0, 160.0) 148.5 (134.0, 160.0) 127.0 (108.0, 142.0) <0.001
24-h urine total protein, g/d 3.8 (2.4, 5.1) 4.0 (2.8, 5.3) 2.3 (1.1, 4.2) 4.3 (3.0, 5.5) 3.9 (2.0, 5.1) <0.001
24-h urine total protein, g/d <0.001
<3.5 g/d 311 (44.2) 171 (39.0) 73 (66.4) 22 (36.7) 45 (47.4)
≥3.5 g/d 392 (55.8) 267 (61.0) 37 (33.6) 38 (63.3) 50 (52.6)
Scr, μmol/L 73.1 (55.8, 93.8) 66.5 (52.3, 80.1) 88.0 (66.3, 110.9) 79.6 (72.5, 96.0) 99.2 (65.0, 139.1) <0.001
eGFRd, mL/min/1.73 m2 100.1 (74.2, 119.5) 105.7 (88.2, 122.8) 86.1 (62.1, 116.3) 95.2 (73.5, 114.9) 69.9 (40.1, 106.4) <0.001
Urea, mmol/L 5.0 (4.0, 6.7) 4.6 (3.8, 5.7) 5.6 (4.7, 7.0) 6.3 (4.7, 9.0) 6.8 (4.8, 8.4) <0.001
Uric acid, μmol/L 368.0 (309.7, 429.3) 356.7 (299.5, 424.2) 374.4 (325.1, 424.6) 413.0 (326.7, 520.0) 377.0 (320.8, 440.7) 0.001
Total cholesterol, mmol/L 6.1 (4.9, 8.0) 6.6 (5.3, 8.2) 4.9 (4.0, 5.4) 8.6 (5.7, 10.5) 5.2 (3.9, 6.7) <0.001
Triglycerides, mmol/L 2.1 (1.6, 3.0) 2.3 (1.7, 3.4) 1.8 (1.5, 2.4) 2.0 (1.6, 2.5) 1.6 (1.2, 2.4) <0.001
Low-density lipoprotein, mmol/L 3.7 (2.9, 5.1) 4.0 (3.2, 5.4) 3.0 (2.6, 3.6) 5.1 (3.2, 6.6) 3.1 (2.4, 4.1) <0.001
Albumin, g/L 28.2 (22.2, 35.3) 27.5 (22.2, 33.3) 36.7 (31.8, 40.6) 19.3 (17.6, 26.2) 32.1 (25.6, 37.4) <0.001
IFTAe <0.001
Absence 182 (26.0) 110 (25.1) 10 (9.1) 34 (56.7) 29 (30.5)
Mild 458 (65.1) 314 (71.7) 68 (61.8) 26 (43.3) 50 (52.6)
Moderate 51 (7.3) 12 (2.7) 24 (21.8) 0 15 (15.8)
Diffuse 11 (1.6) 2 (0.5) 8 (7.3) 0 1 (1.1)
Arteriolar hyalinosis 187 (26.6) 113 (25.8) 36 (32.7) 6 (10.0) 32 (33.7) 0.004
Crescent present 85 (12.1) 15 (3.4) 56 (50.9) 0 14 (14.7) <0.001
Nodular mesangial sclerosis present 178 (25.3) 69 (15.8) 58 (52.7) 0 51 (53.7) <0.001
Glomerular obsolescencee <0.001
Absence 484 (68.8) 339 (77.4) 48 (43.6) 52 (86.7) 45 (47.4)
Mild 169 (24.0) 87 (19.9) 42 (38.2) 8 (13.3) 32 (33.7)
Moderate 42 (6.0) 8 (1.8) 20 (18.2) 0 14 (14.7)
Diffuse 8 (1.1) 4 (0.9) 0 0 4 (4.2)

Baseline clinical and histopathologic characteristics in patients with different types of primary glomerulopathy.

Statistically significant differences are in bold. Values for categorical variables are given as number (percentage); values for continuous variables, as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range). AKI, acute kidney injury; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IFTA, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy; IgAN, immunoglobulin A nephropathy; MN, membranous nephropathy; MCD, minimal change disease; NS, nephrotic syndrome.

a

The other diagnoses included focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, endocapillary proliferative glomerulonephritis, non-IgA mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis, pauci-immune crescentic glomerulonephritis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, thin basement membrane nephropathy, Alport syndrome.

b

Categorical data were compared using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous data were compared using the t test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), or Kruskal-Wallis test.

c

We defined clinical syndromes as follows: nephrotic syndrome (NS) as 24-h urine protein ≥3.5 g/day with serum albumin <30 g/L; acute kidney injury (AKI) as either serum creatinine increase ≥0.3 mg/dL (≥26.5 μmol/L) within 48 h, ≥1.5 times increase from baseline within 7 days, or urine output <0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 h; CKD as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 persisting for ≥3 months.

d

GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation.

e

IFTA and glomerular obsolescence were graded as absent (≤10% involvement), mild (10–30%), moderate (31–60%), or diffuse (>60%) based on the percentage of affected glomeruli or cortical tubulointerstitial area.

Therapy

Among 438 patients diagnosed with MN, 97 (22.1%) received RASi alone following kidney biopsy, while 43 (9.8%) were treated with glucocorticoids alone, of whom 16/43 (37.2%) achieved 24 h-UTP < 3.5 g/d (Supplementary Table S2). Twelve patients (2.7%) did not receive any pharmacological treatment, with the remaining patients undergoing either monotherapy with IST or combination therapy with glucocorticoids. Among patients receiving IST either as monotherapy or in combination with glucocorticoids, CNIs (212/438, 48.4%) and CTX (37/438, 8.4%) were the most frequently prescribed regimens, followed by RTX (19/438, 4.3%) and tripterygium Wilfordii Hook F (TwHF, 17/438, 3.9%). MMF (2/438, 0.5%) was the least utilized therapeutic option (Table 2).

Table 2

Therapy and Outcomes Total (n = 608) MN (n = 438) IgAN (n = 110) MCD (n = 60)
Therapy after biopsy
RASi alone 133 (21.9) 97 (22.1) 30 (27.3) 6 (10.0)
Steroid alone 127 (20.9) 43 (9.8) 39 (35.5) 45 (75.0)
IST alone/combined steroid 330 (54.3) 286 (65.3) 35 (31.8) 9 (8.3)
Cyclophosphamide 55 (9.0) 37 (8.4) 18 (16.4) 0
Calcineurin inhibitor 231 (38.0) 212 (48.4) 13 (11.8) 6 (10.0)
TwHF 21 (3.5) 17 (3.9) 4 (3.6) 0
Mycophenolate mofetil 4 (0.7) 2 (0.5) 2 (1.8) 0
Hydroxychloroquine 10 (1.6) 9 (2.1) 0 1 (1.7)
Rituximab 21 (3.5) 19 (4.3) 0 2 (3.3)
None 18 (3.0) 12 (2.7) 6 (5.5) 0
Remission of proteinuriaa
CR 333 (54.8) 216 (49.3) 63 (57.3) 54 (90.0)
PR 148 (24.3) 106 (24.2) 36 (32.7) 6 (10.0)
NR 101 (16.6) 90 (20.5) 11 (10.0) 0
Relapse 26 (3.7) 26 (5.9) 0 0
Kidney disease progression eventsb 79 (13.0) 61 (13.9) 14 (12.7) 4 (6.7)
ESKD 8 (1.3) 2 (0.5) 4 (3.6) 2 (3.3)
30% reduction of baseline eGFR 71 (11.7) 59 (13.5) 10 (9.1) 2 (3.3)

Therapy and outcomes of three main primary glomerulopathy.

CR, complete remission; ESKD, end stage kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; TwHF, Tripterygium Wilfordii Hook F; IST, immunosuppressive therapy; IgAN, immunoglobulin A nephropathy; MN, membranous nephropathy; MCD, minimal change disease; NR, nonresponse; PR, partial remission; RASi, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors; steroid, glucocorticosteroid.

a

The definition of different outcomes: CR was characterized by a decrease in 24 h-UTP excretion to ≤0.3 g/day, along with normalized serum albumin levels and stable renal function. PR was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the 24 h-UTP ratio and a final excretion of ≤3.5 g/day. NR was defined as 24 h-UTP remaining above 3.5 g/ day throughout follow-up, with a urinary protein reduction of less than 50%. Relapse was defined as new development of the 24 h-UTP >3.5 g/d after CR or PR. Remission of proteinuria was referred to as CR and PR.

b

Kidney disease progression event was defined as a 30% decrease in eGFR during the follow-up period or the development of ESKD by at least 4 weeks. ESKD was defined as initiation of long-term dialysis, kidney transplant, or eGFR<15 mL/min/1.73 m2. GFR was estimated according to the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine equation.

Among IgAN patients, glucocorticoids monotherapy following kidney biopsy was relatively common (39/110, 35.5%), with CTX (18/110, 16.4%) and CNIs (13/110, 11.8%) being the most frequently used IST. MCD patients showed the highest rate of glucocorticoids monotherapy among the three groups at 75% (45/60), while 9 cases (8.3%) received either IST alone or in combination with glucocorticoids (Table 2).

Clinical outcomes

Remission of proteinuria

Patients were stratified based on proteinuria outcomes, and baseline clinical characteristics were compared across these groups (Table 3). During a median follow-up of 18 months, 481/608 (79.1%) patients achieved proteinuria remission, including 333 patients (54.8%) who attained CR. Conversely, 101 patients (16.6%) exhibited treatment resistance with persistent proteinuria, while 26 patients (4.3%) experienced at least one relapse. Adults with MCD demonstrated significantly higher proteinuria remission rates (100%, 60/60) compared to MN (73.5%, 322/438) and IgAN (90.0%, 99/110) cohorts (p < 0.001).

Table 3

Characteristics Remission of proteinuria Persistent proteinuria p valuea
Total CR PR Total NR Relapse
Number of patients, n 481 (79.1) 333 (54.8) 148 (24.3) 127 (20.9) 101 (16.6) 26 (4.3)
Age at biopsy, years 47.0 (37.0, 55.0) 47.0 (37.0, 55.0) 45.0 (36.0, 54.8) 49.0 (41.0, 59.0) 50.0 (41.5, 60.0) 48.0 (41.0, 57.3) 0.009
Male sex 277 (57.6) 179 (53.8) 98 (66.2) 86 (67.7) 64 (63.4) 22 (84.6) 0.042
Family history of kidney disease 8 (1.7) 8 (2.4) 0 2 (1.6) 2 (2.0) 0 1.00
Smoking history 159 (33.1) 105 (31.5) 54 (36.5) 45 (35.4) 29 (28.7) 16 (61.5) 0.67
Alcohol history 143 (29.7) 87 (26.1) 56 (37.8) 28 (22.0) 22 (21.8) 6 (23.1) 0.10
Duration of illness, months 10.0 (8.0, 13.0) 10.0 (8.0, 13.0) 10.0 (8.0, 13.0) 11.0 (9.0, 13.0) 11.0 (9.0, 13.0) 11.0 (9.0, 13.0) 0.007
Comorbidities
Hypertension 251 (52.2) 156 (46.8) 95 (64.2) 81 (63.8) 69 (68.3) 12 (46.2) 0.021
Diabetes mellitus 74 (15.40) 50 (15.0) 24 (16.20) 21 (16.5) 17 (16.8) 4 (15.4) 0.78
BMI, kg/m2 25.2 (23.0, 27.8) 24.9 (22.9, 27.3) 26.1 (24.0, 28.4) 27.1 (23.6, 28.6) 26.9 (23.4, 28.8) 27.2 (25.4, 28.5) 0.002
24-h urine total protein, g/d 3.9 (2.5, 5.1) 3.6 (2.3, 4.8) 4.3 (3.4, 5.6) 3.4 (2.3, 5.6) 3.3 (2.1, 4.9) 5.0 (3.4, 7.3) 0.59
24-h urine total protein, g/d 0.001
<3.5 g/d 194 (40.3) 156 (46.8) 38 (25.7) 72 (56.7) 64 (63.4) 8 (30.8)
≥3.5 g/d 287 (59.7) 177 (53.2) 110 (74.3) 55 (43.3) 37 (36.6) 18 (69.2)
eGFRb, mL/min/1.73 m2 102.0 (77.8, 121.8) 104.1 (81.0, 123.5) 97.0 (73.7, 116.5) 102.2 (85.8, 116.8) 98.9 (78.0, 112.8) 111.1 (101.3, 124.0) 0.96
Hemoglobin, g/L 142.0 (125.0, 157.0) 142.0 (125.0, 158.0) 142.0 (125.0, 155.0) 145.0 (131.0, 155.0) 143.0 (130.0, 154.0) 153.0 (135.0, 167.3) 0.10
Scr, μmol/L 71.9 (54.1, 88.8) 70.8 (52.7, 85.4) 76.9 (58.0, 95.0) 71.6 (59.6, 85.3) 73.0 (59.7, 90.3) 68.2 (53.2, 73.0) 0.92
Urea, mmol/L 4.8 (3.9, 6.5) 4.8 (4.0, 6.4) 4.9 (3.8, 6.6) 4.8 (3.9, 5.6) 4.9 (3.9, 5.8) 4.7 (4.0, 5.5) 0.39
Uric acid, μmol/L 361.4 (301.3, 428.1) 350.3 (297.5, 423.4) 382.2 (317.7, 435.9) 381.8 (327.3, 428.9) 381.8 (334.7, 428.9) 381.4 (325.9, 427.6) 0.13
Total cholesterol, mmol/L 6.3 (5.0, 8.1) 6.3 (5.0, 8.4) 6.3 (5.0, 7.8) 6.6 (5.2, 8.2) 6.4 (5.1, 8.2) 6.6 (5.2, 7.3) 0.38
Triglycerides, mmol/L 2.1 (1.6, 3.0) 2.1 (1.6, 3.1) 2.0 (1.6, 3.0) 2.3 (1.8, 3.5) 2.3 (1.7, 3.5) 3.0 (1.9, 3.6) 0.024
Low-density lipoprotein, mmol/L 3.7 (3.0, 5.1) 3.7 (3.0, 5.2) 3.8 (2.8, 5.1) 4.0 (3.2, 5.7) 3.9 (3.1, 5.5) 4.4 (3.4, 6.4) 0.15
Albumin, g/L 28.9 (22.2, 35.1) 28.7 (21.5, 35.8) 28.9 (22.7, 33.9) 25.0 (21.4, 32.2) 25.7 (21.7, 33.7) 23.6 (19.5, 30.7) 0.004
Pathological diagnoses <0.001
MN 322 (66.9) 216 (64.9) 106 (71.6) 116 (91.3) 90 (89.1) 26 (100.0)
IgAN 99 (20.6) 63 (18.9) 36 (24.3) 11 (8.7) 11 (10.9) 0
MCD 60 (12.5) 54 (16.2) 6 (4.1) 0 0 0
IFTAc 0.71
Absence 125 (26.0) 94 (28.2) 31 (20.9) 29 (22.8) 24 (23.8) 5 (19.2)
Mild 320 (66.5) 222 (66.7) 98 (66.2) 88 (69.3) 68 (67.3) 20 (76.9)
Moderate 27 (5.6) 17 (5.1) 10 (6.8) 9 (7.1) 8 (7.9) 1 (3.8)
Diffuse 9 (1.9) 0 9 (6.1) 1 (0.8) 1 (1.0) 0
Arteriolar hyalinosis 123 (25.6) 82 (24.6) 41 (27.7) 32 (25.2) 30 (29.7) 2 (7.7) 1.00
Crescent present 58 (12.1) 34 (10.2) 24 (16.2) 13 (10.2) 11 (10.9) 2 (7.7) 0.64
Nodular mesangial sclerosis present 91 (18.9) 49 (14.7) 42 (28.4) 36 (28.3) 27 (26.7) 9 (34.6) 0.027
Glomerular obsolescencec 0.14
Absence 341 (70.9) 247 (74.2) 94 (63.5) 98 (77.2) 72 (71.3) 26 (100.0)
Mild 113 (23.5) 79 (23.7) 34 (23.0) 24 (18.9) 24 (23.8) 0
Moderate 25 (5.20) 7 (2.1) 18 (12.2) 3 (2.4) 3 (3.0) 0
Diffuse 2 (0.4) 0 2 (1.4) 2 (1.6) 2 (2.0) 0

Baseline clinical and histopathologic characteristics by outcomes of proteinuria.

Statistically significant differences are in bold. Values for categorical variables are given as number (percentage); values for continuous variables, as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range). BMI, body mass index; CR, complete remission; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IFTA, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy; IgAN, immunoglobulin A nephropathy; MN, membranous glomerulonephritis; MCD, minimal change disease; NR, nonresponse; PR, partial remission.

a

Categorical data were compared using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous data were compared using the t test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), or Kruskal-Wallis test.

b

GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation.

c

IFTA and glomerular obsolescence were graded as absent (≤10% involvement), mild (10–30%), moderate (31–60%), or diffuse (>60%) based on the percentage of affected glomeruli or cortical tubulointerstitial area.

Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed significant associations between proteinuria remission and multiple factors including alcohol history, disease duration, levels of 24 h-UTP, serum creatinine, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels, Pathological diagnoses, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA), and presence of arteriolar hyalinosis (Table 4). Kaplan–Meier curves were generated to assess proteinuria outcomes based on five clinically relevant univariate factors (Supplementary Figure S1).

Table 4

Variables Proteinuria outcome Kidney disease progression
Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis
HR 95%CI p valuea HR 95%CI p valuea HR 95%CI p valuea HR 95%CI p valuea
Age at biopsy, years 0.99 0.99–1.00 0.05 0.75 0.48–1.19 0.22
Sex
Male Ref Ref
Female 0.93 0.77–1.11 0.40 1.02 1.00–1.04 0.06
Family history of kidney disease 1.21 0.60–2.45 0.59 0.05 0.00–244.47 0.49
Smoking history 1.20 0.99–1.46 0.06 2.14 1.37–3.36 0.001 1.53 0.81–2.89 0.14
Alcohol history 1.27 1.04–1.55 0.018 1.18 0.96–1.45 0.12 2.40 1.53–3.77 <0.001 1.68 0.91–3.13 0.14
Duration of illness, months 1.02 1.00–1.03 0.024 1.00 0.98–1.02 0.85 1.07 1.04–1.09 <0.001 1.05 1.02–1.08 0.003
Comorbidities
Hypertension 0.98 0.82–1.18 0.85 3.14 1.85–5.32 <0.001 2.61 1.48–4.59 0.004
Diabetes mellitus 1.18 0.92–1.52 0.19 1.62 0.92–2.85 0.09
BMI, kg/m2 1.01 0.98–1.03 0.70 1.05 0.98–1.11 0.15
24-h urine total protein, g/d
<3.5 g/d Ref Ref
≥3.5 g/d 1.20 1.00–1.45 0.048 1.35 1.10–1.64 0.003 1.30 0.83–2.06 0.26
eGFRb, mL/min/1.73 m2 1.00 1.00–1.00 0.08 1.00 0.99–1.00 0.15
Hemoglobin, g/L 1.00 1.00–1.01 0.26 1.00 0.99–1.01 0.45
Scr, μmol/L 1.00 1.00–1.00 0.045 1.00 1.00–1.00 0.53 1.01 1.00–1.01 <0.001 1.00 1.00–1.00 0.79
Urea, mmol/L 1.01 1.00–1.02 0.20 1.01 0.98–1.04 0.57
Uric acid, μmol/L 1.00 1.00–1.00 0.34 1.00 1.00–1.00 0.30
Total cholesterol, mmol/L 1.00 0.96–1.04 0.92 1.05 0.95–1.15 0.32
Triglycerides, mmol/L 0.93 0.89–0.98 0.004 0.95 0.90–1.00 0.07 1.00 0.91–1.10 1.00
Low-density lipoprotein, mmol/L 0.95 0.91–0.99 0.016 0.91 0.86–0.96 <0.001 1.00 0.93–1.07 0.97
Albumin, g/L 1.00 0.99–1.01 0.76 0.97 0.94–1.00 0.027 0.97 0.937–1.00 0.17
Pathological diagnoses 0.001 0.040 0.30
MCD Ref Ref
MN 0.59 0.45–0.78 <0.001 0.68 0.50–0.92 0.011 1.78 0.65–490 0.27 1.50 0.51–4.44 0.47
IgAN 0.59 0.43–0.82 0.001 0.72 0.49–1.04 0.08 1.24 0.41–3.77 0.71 0.86 0.22–3.34 0.83
IFTAc <0.001 <0.001 0.029 0.08
Absence Ref Ref
Mild 0.49 0.40–0.61 <0.001 0.47 0.37–0.60 <0.001 0.46 0.26–0.80 0.006 0.46 0.22–0.97 0.04
Moderate 0.42 0.27–0.63 <0.001 0.34 0.21–0.54 <0.001 0.52 0.20–1.34 0.18 0.49 0.14–1.68 0.25
Diffuse 0.36 0.18–0.71 0.003 0.20 0.10–0.42 <0.001 0.98 0.36–2.70 0.97 1.18 0.22–6.32 0.85
Arteriolar hyalinosis 1.25 1.02–1.54 0.035 1.49 1.18–1.86 0.001 1.70 1.04–2.77 0.033 1.15 0.65–2.03 0.64
Crescent present 0.79 0.60–1.04 0.10 1.39 0.80–2.42 0.24
Nodular mesangial sclerosis present 0.83 0.66–1.05 0.12 2.07 1.31–3.28 0.002 1.79 1.01–3.16 0.045
Glomerular obsolescencec 0.76 0.011 0.55
Absence Ref Ref
Mild 0.92 0.74–1.14 0.44 1.06 0.62–1.81 0.82 1.37 0.74–2.56 0.32
Moderate 1.01 0.67–1.52 0.96 3.04 1.57–5.87 0.001 2.00 0.72–5.57 0.18
Diffuse 0.58 0.14–2.32 0.44 0.00 0.00–7.15 × 10268 0.97 0.00 0.00–7.05 × 10233 0.97

Univariable and multivariable analysis of variables for hazard of proteinuria outcome and kidney disease progression events.

Bold values indicate significant factors for the outcome event. BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HR, hazard ratio; IFTA, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy; IgAN, immunoglobulin A nephropathy; MN, membranous nephropathy; MCD, minimal change disease; Ref, reference.

a

Comparisons of p values in characteristics were performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. Parameters that were significant in the univariable analysis (p < 0.05) were included in this multivariate.

b

GFR was estimated according to the CKDEpidemiology Collaboration creatinine equation.

c

IFTA and glomerular obsolescence were graded as absent (≤10% involvement), mild (10–30%), moderate (31–60%), or diffuse (> 60%) based on the percentage of affected glomeruli or cortical tubulointerstitial area.

The nine statistically significant variables identified in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. We tested the interaction terms between pathological diagnoses and each of the following variables: 24 h-UTP, LDL, IFTA, and arteriolar hyalinosis. No statistically significant interactions were found (Supplementary Table S3). Accordingly, the hazard ratios for these factors are reported as unified estimates from the overall population model. Results revealed that 24 h-UTP at kidney biopsy (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10–1.64, p = 0.003), serum LDL cholesterol levels (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.86–0.96, p < 0.001), pathological classification (MN vs. MCD, HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50–0.92, p = 0.011), IFTA severity (Mild vs. absence HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.37–0.59, p < 0.001; Moderate vs. absence HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21–0.54, p < 0.001; Severe vs. absence HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.10–0.42, p < 0.001), presence of arteriolar hyalinosis (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.18–1.86, p = 0.001) were significantly correlated with remission of proteinuria (Supplementary Figure S2). In subgroup analyses, different therapeutical regimens were associated with proteinuria remission in patients with MN but not in those with IgAN (Supplementary Tables S4, S5).

Kidney disease progression

During a median follow-up of 18 months in 608 patients, no deaths were recorded. Kidney disease progression occurred in 79 individuals (13.0%), of whom 8 (1.3%) reached ESKD and 71 (11.7%) experienced an eGFR decline of ≥30% (Table 2). Among the 8 ESKD cases, the underlying diagnoses were MN (n = 2), IgAN (n = 4), and MCD (n = 2). Notably, of the 438 MN patients included in the study, 59 (13.5%) experienced a decline in eGFR exceeding 30%. Comparative analysis of baseline characteristics between patients with and without kidney disease progression is presented in Table 5.

Table 5

Characteristics With kidney disease progression events (n = 79) Without kidney disease progression events (n = 529) p valuea
Male sex 48 (60.8) 315 (59.5) 0.90
Age at biopsy, years 54.0 (42.0, 61.0) 46.0 (38.0, 55.5) 0.008
Duration of illness, months 12.0 (10.0, 15.0) 10.0 (8.0, 13.0) <0.001
Family history of kidney disease 0 10 (1.9) 0.38
Smoking history 36 (44.3) 169 (31.9) 0.040
Alcohol history 34 (43.0) 137 (25.9) 0.002
Pathological diagnoses 0.026
MN 61 (77.2) 377 (71.3)
IgAN 14 (17.7) 96 (18.1)
MCD 4 (5.1) 56 (10.6)
Clinical syndromedb <0.001
NS 65 (82.3) 373 (70.5)
AKI with NS 2 (2.5) 18 (3.4)
AKI without NS 0 6 (1.1)
Progressive CKD 6 (7.6) 18 (3.4)
Proteinuria 6 (7.6) 108 (20.4)
Isolated hematuria 0 6 (1.1)
Comorbidities
Hypertension 60 (75.9) 272 (51.4) <0.001
Diabetes mellitus 15 (19.0) 80 (15.1) 0.41
Systolic BP, mmHg 146.0 (132.0,158.0) 143.0 (130.0, 157.0) 0.51
Diastolic BP, mmHg 88.0 (82.0,99.0) 90.0 (80.0, 97.0) 0.88
BMI, kg/m2 26.6 (23.6,28.6) 25.4 (23.3, 28.1) 0.21
Hemoglobin, g/L 135.0 (127.0,149.0) 143.0 (126.0, 158.0) 0.05
24-h urine total protein, g/d 4.2 (3.0,5.7) 3.7 (2.4, 5.1) 0.11
24-h urine total protein, g/d 0.28
<3.5 g/d 30 (38.0) 236 (44.6)
≥3.5 g/d 49 (62.0) 293 (55.4)
Scr, μmol/L 68.6 (52.4, 81.2) 72.4 (55.4, 88.6) 0.36
eGFRc, mL/min/1.73 m2 102.2 (78.3, 122.6) 102.0 (79.2, 120.6) 0.86
Urea, mmol/L 4.7 (4.0, 6.5) 4.8 (3.9, 6.3) 1.00
Uric acid, μmol/L 374.4 (324.4, 436.7) 362.6 (306.4, 428.1) 0.24
Total cholesterol, mmol/L 6.6 (5.2, 8.2) 6.3 (5.0, 8.1) 0.35
Triglycerides, mmol/L 2.7 (1.8, 3.5) 2.1 (1.6, 3.0) 0.011
Low-density lipoprotein, mmol/L 4.0 (3.3, 5.7) 3.7 (3.0, 5.1) 0.025
Albumin, g/L 27.0 (21.4, 33.3) 28.3 (21.8, 35.2) 0.16
IFTAd 0.015
Absence 17 (21.5) 137 (25.9)
Mild 51 (64.6) 357 (67.5)
Moderate 6 (7.6) 30 (5.7)
Diffuse 5 (6.3) 5 (0.9)
Arteriolar hyalinosis 24 (30.4) 131 (24.8) 0.33
Crescent present 16 (20.3) 55 (10.4) 0.015
Nodular mesangial sclerosis present 29 (36.7) 98 (18.5) <0.001
Glomerular obsolescenced 0.001
Absence 48 (60.8) 391 (73.9)
Mild 20 (25.3) 117 (22.1)
Moderate 11 (13.9) 17 (3.2)
Diffuse 0 4 (0.8)

Baseline clinical and histopathologic characteristics by kidney disease progression events.

Statistically significant differences are in bold. Values for categorical variables are given as number (percentage); values for continuous variables, as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range). AKI, acute kidney injury; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IFTA, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy; IgAN, immunoglobulin A nephropathy; MN, membranous nephropathy; MCD, minimal change disease; NS, nephrotic syndrome.

a

Categorical data were compared using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous data were compared using the t test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), or Kruskal-Wallis test.

b

We defined clinical syndromes as follows: nephrotic syndrome (NS) as 24-h urine protein ≥3.5 g/day with serum albumin <30 g/L; acute kidney injury (AKI) as either serum creatinine increase ≥0.3 mg/dL (≥26.5 μmol/L) within 48 h, ≥1.5 times increase from baseline within 7 days, or urine output <0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 h; chronic kidney disease (CKD) as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 persisting for ≥3 months.

c

GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation.

d

IFTA and glomerular obsolescence were graded as absent (≤10% involvement), mild (10–30%), moderate (31–60%), or diffuse (>60%) based on the percentage of affected glomeruli or cortical tubulointerstitial area.

The univariable Cox regression analysis identified several significant risk factors for kidney disease progression, including alcohol history, smoking history, disease duration, hypertension history, serum creatinine levels, albumin levels, and four histopathological features (IFTA, arteriolar hyalinosis, nodular mesangial sclerosis presence, and glomerular obsolescence; Table 4). Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed to assess kidney disease progression based on seven significant univariate categorical variables (Supplementary Figure S3).

To account for heterogeneity across different pathological diagnoses (MN, IgAN, MCD), pathological diagnoses was included as a variable in the multivariable analysis. All eleven variables that reached statistical significance in univariable analyses were entered into a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Independent predictors of kidney disease progression were history of hypertension (HR 2.37, 95 % CI 1.32 - 4.25, p = 0.004), and the presence of nodular mesangial sclerosis (HR 1.79, 95 % CI 1.01 - 3.16, p = 0.045; Supplementary Figure S4). Interaction analysis suggested that the effect pattern of disease duration on kidney disease progression might differ across pathological diagnoses (interaction p = 0.001; Supplementary Table S6). Subgroup analysis stratified by pathological diagnoses revealed that, in patients with MN, longer disease duration was an independent risk factor for kidney disease progression (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.07, p = 0.013). In contrast, among patients with IgAN, although its effect differed significantly from that in minimal change disease (MCD) (interaction HR 1.16, p = 0.035), disease duration did not show a statistically significant independent effect within the IgAN subgroup itself (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.78–1.31, p = 0.96) (Supplementary Figure S5). No significant association was observed between different therapeutic regimens and kidney disease progression events in either the MN or IgAN patient groups (Supplementary Tables S4, S5).

Discussion

This retrospective single-center study analyzed the disease distribution and clinical outcomes of PGN using kidney biopsy records from 2013 to 2023. After rigorous screening, 703 patients were enrolled, with MN (62.3%), IgAN (15.6%), and MCD (8.5%) constituting the predominant pathological subtypes. All followed patients received protocol-based care under nephrologist supervision. In the MN/IgAN/MCD subgroup (n = 608), proteinuria remission was achieved in 481 cases (79.1%), while 79 patients (13.0%) exhibited renal function deterioration. Notably, MN accounted for 77.9% (61/79) of progression cases, this distribution pattern may reflect both the cohort’s high MN prevalence and the typically prolonged progression to ESKD in IgAN patients (18, 23). Key findings demonstrated that: (1) baseline 24 h-UTP was an independent predictive factor for proteinuria remission (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10–1.64, p = 0.003); (2) hypertension history independently associated with kidney progression (HR 2.61, 95% CI 1.48–4.59, p = 0.004); (3) interstitial IFTA severity correlated with both reduced remission probability and accelerated functional decline; and (4) nodular mesangial sclerosis substantially increased progression risk (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.01–3.16, p = 0.045).

Consistent with the KDIGO clinical practice guidelines (14), patients with MN were stratified into four prognostic categories according to proteinuria levels (24 h-UTP) and renal function (eGFR). In this study, 22.1% (97/438) of MN patients received RASi monotherapy, while 75.1% (329/438) were treated with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants, either alone or in combination. This practice deviates from the KDIGO guideline (14), which recommends an initial observation period of at least 6 months to monitor for spontaneous remission. First, many patients already exhibit clinical manifestations of kidney disease for up to 6 months or more before laboratory tests confirm proteinuria and hypoalbuminemia. As a result, clinicians often consider spontaneous remission unlikely. Second, many patients develop complications such as thromboembolism even before undergoing kidney biopsy, indicating a necessity for immediate initiation of IST. Additionally, a considerable number of patients present with high anti-PLA2R antibody titers, leading clinicians to anticipate a lower probability of remission. For these reasons, many patients end up receiving glucocorticoids and/or IST even when they do not strictly meet the indications outlined in the KDIGO guidelines. The deviation from guideline-recommended treatment for MN, as described above, was also evident in the Cure Glomerulonephropathy (CureGN) cohort study (24). In that study, 55% of adults initiated IST within 6 months after kidney biopsy, including patients with a urine protein-to-creatinine ratio below 4 g/g.

Recent decades have witnessed substantial therapeutic advances in IgAN, encompassing endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA) (25, 26), mucosal-targeted corticosteroids (27), complement inhibitors (28–31), and immunomodulators targeting the BLyS/BAFF-APRIL axis (32). According to the 2025 KDIGO guidelines (33), the management of IgAN centers on a proteinuria target of < 0.5 g/day (ideally < 0.3 g/day) and a “dual synergistic” strategy addressing both immunologic drivers and CKD progression. All patients require foundational care: lifestyle adjustments (smoking cessation, weight control, sodium < 2 g/d, exercise) and stringent blood pressure control (≤120/70 mmHg). For patients with risk of progressive kidney function loss, immunologic intervention is advised, preferentially with a 9-month course of Nefecon. Where Nefecon is unavailable, a reduced-dose corticosteroid regimen (e.g., methylprednisolone) with antimicrobial prophylaxis serves as an alternative (33). Notably, antiplatelet agents and azathioprine are discouraged, though mycophenolate mofetil or hydroxychloroquine are corticosteroid-sparing options exclusive to Chinese patients. To counter CKD progression, optimized RASi therapy is essential for all eligible individuals. High-risk patients in approved regions should also receive sparsentan (contraindicated with RASi) and an SGLT2i. Given the marked heterogeneity in disease progression and outcomes, personalized treatment strategies are imperative.

Oral glucocorticoids represent the cornerstone of first-line therapy for adult MCD (34), supported by two randomized controlled trials and extensive observational studies demonstrating remission rates exceeding 80% (35, 36). Treatment regimens can be individualized based on clinical response and patient-specific factors. In this study, 75% (45/60) of MCD patients received glucocorticoid monotherapy. Among these patients, 88.9% (40/45) achieved CR and 11.1% (5/45) attained PR. While the efficacy of steroid therapy in this cohort appears higher than in prior reports, this finding should be interpreted with caution as it may reflect the constraints of our modest sample size rather than a true therapeutic advantage. For patients with relative contraindications to glucocorticoids or those who are unwilling to use glucocorticoids (15% in MCD patients of our cohort), alternative initial agents include CTX, CNIs, RTX or MMF. Relapse is very common in patients with MCD, although it was not observed in the follow-up of this cohort. This may be related to the short follow-up duration and small sample size.

IgAN and MN are the two most prevalent forms of PGN. Globally, the incidence of IgAN exhibits significant geographical variation. In China, it accounts for approximately 39.73–44.4% of PGN cases and is a leading cause of ESKD, whereas MN is a major etiology of antibody-associated NS in adults (1, 37). Recent research has focused on common pathogenic mechanisms underlying both diseases, such as oxidative stress (38), inflammatory fibrosis (39), and dysregulation of signaling pathways (40–43). In terms of intervention, TCM (44), small-molecule inhibitors (38, 42, 43), and certain chemical agents (39) have demonstrated therapeutic potential. Furthermore, relevant signaling pathways (40) and their regulatory molecules (44) may serve as novel biomarkers for disease diagnosis and prognosis evaluation, offering promising directions for future treatment strategies.

A report from the NEPTUNE study showed that among 441 enrolled patients, 46% achieved CR of proteinuria, including 75% with MCD, 34% with FSGS, 31% with MN, and 41% with other pathological diagnoses (17). In the present study, 54.8% (333/608) of the cohort achieved CR. Specifically, the CR rates were 49.3% for MN, 57.3% for IgAN, and 90.0% for MCD, respectively. Notably, a subset of patients with MN in our cohort received glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressants early in the disease course, which deviates from guideline recommendations. This observation may partially explain why the CR rate in the present study is higher than that reported in previous literature (45, 46). Furthermore, in our subgroup multivariate analysis, we also observed that the choice of treatment regimen was associated with the remission of proteinuria.

Regarding risk factors influencing proteinuria remission, a prospective study from NEPTUNE found that the amount of proteinuria before kidney biopsy, pathological diagnosis, and the use of immunosuppressive agents were all associated with CR. Specifically, patients with higher pre-biopsy proteinuria had 0.3 times the probability of achieving remission compared to those with low proteinuria (17). This study observed that patients with higher baseline proteinuria levels (24 h-UTP ≥ 3.5 g/d) actually had a greater probability of achieving proteinuria remission. This phenomenon may be explained by two factors. First, the study cohort might have included a higher proportion of pathological diagnoses that are highly responsive to treatment and often present with heavy proteinuria, such as MCD or early-stage MN, thereby creating the appearance that higher baseline proteinuria is associated with a higher remission rate. Second, in survival analysis with “proteinuria remission” as the endpoint, patients with more active baseline disease have greater relative potential for clinical improvement, which can lead to a statistically stronger positive association.

Dyslipidemia is highly prevalent among patients with kidney disease. Previous research has indicated that dyslipidemia has a causal relationship with glomerular injury, ultimately leading to glomerulosclerosis (47). Elevated triglycerides (TGs) and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels appear to be independent risk factors for the development of advanced CKD (48). The present results demonstrate that while baseline LDL levels did not differ significantly between patients with and without proteinuria remission (p = 0.152), COX regression analysis indicated that, for each 1 mmol/L increase in baseline LDL levels, the probability of achieving proteinuria remission was reduced by a factor of 0.91 (HR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86–0.96, p < 0.001). When stratified by the presence of kidney disease progression, the group with progression exhibited elevated levels of both triglycerides (p = 0.011) and LDL (p = 0.025) compared to the non-progression group. This observation is supported by a biological rationale: substantial experimental evidence indicates that LDL aggravates renal injury by inducing glomerular podocyte damage, mesangial matrix proliferation, inflammatory responses, and fibrosis, which collectively hinder proteinuria remission (47). Thus, our study corroborates, from a clinical epidemiological perspective, the critical role of LDL management in the context of proteinuria treatment.

The histopathological changes found in kidney biopsy specimens are vital not only for diagnosing kidney diseases but also for assessing prognosis and predicting disease progression. Key histological markers of irreversible renal damage comprise IFTA and glomerulosclerosis. Among these, IFTA is the strongest morphological predictor of CKD progression and prognosis, irrespective of the underlying etiology (49). Evidence from previous studies indicates that, even after accounting for clinical predictors (e.g., eGFR, proteinuria, and clinicopathologic diagnosis), both IFTA and vascular lesions (arterial/arteriolar sclerosis and global glomerulosclerosis) remained independent predictors of kidney disease progression (50). This study incorporated histopathological features of patients to analyze risk factors for proteinuria remission and disease progression in MN, IgAN and MCD. The analysis identified IFTA and arteriolar hyalinosis as risk factors for impaired proteinuria remission, while nodular mesangial sclerosis was associated with kidney disease progression. A significant difference in IFTA was observed between patients with and without kidney disease progression. This is largely consistent with previous findings.

This study has several limitations. First, the decision to perform a kidney biopsy depends on the patient’s clinical manifestations, the clinician’s judgment, and the patient’s consent. Therefore, patients with mild disease or some high-risk patients concerned about biopsy-related risks may decline the procedure. These real-world clinical scenarios can introduce selection bias and unavoidable confounding factors. Second, the potential influence of heterogeneity in clinical management and treatment decisions among different physicians was not accounted for in this study. Third, a key limitation of this study is the potential for selection bias, as we only included patients with complete follow-up data. This likely excluded those lost to follow-up who may have had worse outcomes, possibly overestimating the positive results in our cohort. Additionally, as a retrospective observational study, our outcome analysis incorporated follow-up laboratory results from multiple hospitals, which could introduce detection bias and inter-center variability. Future efforts should therefore focus on building more robust kidney biopsy databases to ensure more complete follow-up tracking and standardized data collection across centers. Fourth, the follow-up duration constrains a full assessment of glomerular disease progression. Extended longitudinal observation is essential to clarify the long-term trajectories of proteinuria and resultant renal outcomes.

In conclusion, our study presents the treatment status, clinical outcomes, and associated influencing factors of the three major types of primary glomerular diseases diagnosed via kidney biopsy. The insights gained from this single-center cohort are directly applicable to and can help inform real-world clinical decision-making.

Statements

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because data from this study may contain potentially or sensitive patient information. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to .

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of the Changzhi Medical College Affiliated Heji Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

WZ (1st Author): Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Methodology, Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Software. YD: Formal analysis, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. WZ (3rd Author): Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Data curation. YW: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Software. LW: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Methodology.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Changzhi Medical College Affiliated Heji Hospital (Approval Number: No. 25–074). This work was supported by the Shanxi Provincial Health Commission (Number 2020066).

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1741853/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1.

    Wang Y Zhang L Yuan L Xie Q Liu S Hao C . Changes in the spectrum of biopsy-proven renal diseases over 11 years: a single-center study in China. Ren Fail. (2024) 46:2381614. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2381614,

  • 2.

    Chen T Sun X Tsuei S Yang R Yip W Fu H . Care for end-stage kidney disease in China: progress, challenges, and recommendations. Lancet Regional Health Western Pacific. (2024) 54:101268. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101268,

  • 3.

    Abd El Hafeez S Kramer A Arici M Arnol M . Incidence and outcomes of kidney replacement therapy for end-stage kidney disease due to primary glomerular disease in Europe: findings from the ERA registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2024) 39:144960. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfae034,

  • 4.

    Locatelli F Del Vecchio L Ponticelli C . Systemic and targeted steroids for the treatment of IgA nephropathy. Clin Kidney J. (2023) 16:ii406. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad224,

  • 5.

    Lee M Suzuki H Nihei Y Matsuzaki K Suzuki Y . Ethnicity and IgA nephropathy: worldwide differences in epidemiology, timing of diagnosis, clinical manifestations, management and prognosis. Clin Kidney J. (2023) 16:ii18. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad199,

  • 6.

    Qin Y Zhao J Wei X Wang Y Yu Z Zhang Y . Distribution of pathological types and epidemiological characteristics based on kidney biopsy in Northwest China. Kidney Res Clin Prac. (2023) 42:6374. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.21.296,

  • 7.

    Chen XJ Huang Y Yuan S Han Y Li Z Xu X . Changes in spectrum of biopsy-proven kidney diseases within decade: an analysis based on 10 199 cases from South China. Postgrad Med J. (2023) 100:207. doi: 10.1093/postmj/qgad094,

  • 8.

    Raza A Nawaz SH Rashid R Ahmed E Mubarak M . The correlation of spot urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio with 24-h urinary protein excretion in various glomerulopathies. World J Nephrol. (2023) 12:15967. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v12.i5.159,

  • 9.

    Tran TTT Ha TK Phan NM Le MV Nguyen TH . Detection of decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with type 2 diabetes by cystatin C-based equations. World J Nephrol. (2024) 13:95761. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v13.i4.95761,

  • 10.

    Liu J Xiong Y Mo H Niu H Miao J Shen W . MicroRNA-29b plays a vital role in podocyte injury and glomerular diseases through inducing mitochondrial dysfunction. Int J Biol Sci. (2024) 20:465473. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.93506,

  • 11.

    Sethi S Beck LH Jr Glassock RJ Haas M . Mayo Clinic consensus report on membranous nephropathy: proposal for a novel classification. Kidney Int. (2023) 104:1092102. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.06.032,

  • 12.

    Duan ZY Zhang C Chen XM Cai GY . Blood and urine biomarkers of disease progression in IgA nephropathy. Biomark Res. (2024) 12:72. doi: 10.1186/s40364-024-00619-4,

  • 13.

    Yang XY Bayliss G Zhuang SG . Obesity-related glomerulopathy: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and current treatments. Integrative Med Nephrol Androl. (2024) 11:e24-00011. doi: 10.1097/IMNA-D-24-00011

  • 14.

    Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Glomerular Diseases Work Group . KDIGO 2021 clinical practice guideline for the management of glomerular diseases. Kidney Int. (2021) 100:S1S276. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.021

  • 15.

    Wu C Zhang R Wang J Chen Y Zhu W Yi X et al . Dioscorea nipponica Makino: a comprehensive review of its chemical composition and pharmacology on chronic kidney disease. Biomed Pharmacother. (2023) 167:115508. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115508,

  • 16.

    Zhang W Hu A Wang J Wang Y Yu X . Use of Chinese herbal medicine to inhibit podocyte damage as therapeutic strategy for membranous nephropathy. Integrative Med Nephrol Androl. (2023) 10:e00004. doi: 10.1097/IMNA-D-23-00004

  • 17.

    Gipson DS Troost JP Lafayette RA Hladunewich MA Trachtman H Gadegbeku CA . Complete remission in the nephrotic syndrome study network. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2016) 11:819. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02560315,

  • 18.

    Fauco AL Lando S Chrysostomou C Wijkström J Lundberg S Bellocco R et al . Primary glomerular diseases and long-term adverse health outcomes: a nationwide cohort study. J Intern Med. (2025) 297:2235. doi: 10.1111/joim.20024

  • 19.

    Tang X VanBeek C Haas M Cook HT Zou J Yang H . Cell-mediated glomerulonephritis without immune complexes in native kidney biopsies: a report of 7 cases. Am J Kidney Dis. (2022) 80:41621. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.11.009,

  • 20.

    Janphram C Worawichawong S Assanatham M Nongnuch A Thotsiri S Udomsubpayakul U . Years of life lost and long-term outcomes due to glomerular disease in a southeast Asian cohort. Sci Rep. (2023) 13:19119. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46268-9,

  • 21.

    Coresh J Turin TC Matsushita K Sang Y Ballew SH Appel LJ . Decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate and subsequent risk of end-stage renal disease and mortality. JAMA. (2014) 311:251831. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.6634,

  • 22.

    Levey AS Stevens LA Schmid CH Zhang YL Castro AF Feldman HI et al . A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. (2009) 150:60412. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006

  • 23.

    Pitcher D Braddon F Hendry B Mercer A Osmaston K Saleem MA . Long-term outcomes in IgA nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2023) 18:72738. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000135,

  • 24.

    O'Shaughnessy MM Troost JP Bomback AS Hladunewich MA Ashoor IF Gibson KL et al . Treatment patterns among adults and children with membranous nephropathy in the cure Glomerulonephropathy network (CureGN). Kidney Int Rep. (2019) 4:172534. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2019.09.005

  • 25.

    Rovin BH Barratt J Heerspink HJL Alpers CE Bieler S Chae DW . Efficacy and safety of sparsentan versus irbesartan in patients with IgA nephropathy (PROTECT): 2-year results from a randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. (2023) 402:207790. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02302-4,

  • 26.

    Heerspink HJL Jardine M Kohan DE Lafayette RA Levin A Liew A et al . Study design and baseline characteristics of ALIGN, a randomized controlled study of Atrasentan in patients with IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int Rep. (2024) 10:21726. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.10.004

  • 27.

    Barratt J Lafayette R Kristensen J Stone A Cattran D Floege J . Results from part a of the multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled NefIgArd trial, which evaluated targeted-release formulation of budesonide for the treatment of primary immunoglobulin a nephropathy. Kidney Int. (2023) 103:391402. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.09.017,

  • 28.

    Lafayette RA Rovin BH Reich HN Tumlin JA Floege J Barratt J . Safety, tolerability and efficacy of Narsoplimab, a novel MASP-2 inhibitor for the treatment of IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int Reports. (2020) 5:203241. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.08.003,

  • 29.

    Zhang H Rizk DV Perkovic V Maes B Kashihara N Rovin B . Results of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2 study propose iptacopan as an alternative complement pathway inhibitor for IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int. (2024) 105:18999. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.09.027,

  • 30.

    Barratt J Liew A Yeo SC Fernström A Barbour SJ Sperati CJ . Phase 2 trial of Cemdisiran in adult patients with IgA nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2024) 19:45262. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000384,

  • 31.

    Bruchfeld A Magin H Nachman P Parikh S Lafayette R Potarca A . C5a receptor inhibitor avacopan in immunoglobulin a nephropathy-an open-label pilot study. Clin Kidney J. (2022) 15:9228. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab294,

  • 32.

    Shabgah AG Shariati-Sarabi Z Tavakkol-Afshari J Mohammadi M . The role of BAFF and APRIL in rheumatoid arthritis. J Cell Physiol. (2019) 234:1705063. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28445,

  • 33.

    Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) IgAN and IgAV Work Group Rovin BH Barratt J Cook HT Cook HT Noronha IL et al . KDIGO 2025 clinical practice guideline for the management of immunoglobulin a nephropathy (IgAN) and immunoglobulin a vasculitis (IgAV). Kidney Int. (2025) 108:S1S71. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2025.04.004,

  • 34.

    Waldman M Crew RJ Valeri A Busch J Stokes B Markowitz G et al . Adult minimal-change disease: clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2007) 2:44553. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03531006,

  • 35.

    Black DA Rose G Brewer DB . Controlled trial of prednisone in adult patients with the nephrotic syndrome. Br Med J. (1970) 3:4216.

  • 36.

    Coggins CH . Adult minimal change nephropathy: experience of the collaborative study of glomerular disease. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. (1986) 97:1826.

  • 37.

    Xu L Wu C Li G . Prevalence and trend of biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy in China: a systematic review. J Nephrol. (2025) 38:155764. doi: 10.1007/s40620-025-02261-1,

  • 38.

    Zhang W Chen J Yuan Y Luo J Zhou Z Wang G . PM2.5-induced oxidative stress upregulates PLA2R expression in the lung and is involved in the pathogenesis of membranous nephropathy through extracellular vesicles. Front Pharmacol. (2024) 15:1516111. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1516111,

  • 39.

    Pang S Zhou R Liu Z Xie B Liu F Feng B . SPP1 as a biomarker for idiopathic membranous nephropathy progression and its regulatory role in inflammation and fibrosis. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1671891. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1671891,

  • 40.

    Liang DY Cong SH Li LH Yi QQ Tang LP Cao LO . Luteolin delays the progression of IgA nephropathy by attenuating inflammation, oxidative stress and reducing extracellular matrix accumulation through activating the Nrf-2/HO-1 pathway. Front Pharmacol. (2025) 16:1530655. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1530655,

  • 41.

    Yuan Z Dong D Zhang L Xu Z . Telitacicept administration improved immunoglobulin a nephropathy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a case report. Front Med. (2025) 12:1667519. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1667519,

  • 42.

    Wang YN Miao H Yu XY Guo Y Su W Liu F . Oxidative stress and inflammation are mediated via aryl hydrocarbon receptor signalling in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Free Radic Biol Med. (2023) 207:89106. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2023.07.014,

  • 43.

    Miao H Wang YN Su W Zou L Zhuang SG Yu XY . Sirtuin 6 protects against podocyte injury by blocking the renin-angiotensin system by inhibiting the Wnt1/β-catenin pathway. Acta Pharmacol Sin. (2024) 45:13749. doi: 10.1038/s41401-023-01148-w,

  • 44.

    Miao H Zhang Y Yu X Zou L Zhao Y . Membranous nephropathy: systems biology-based novel mechanism and traditional Chinese medicine therapy. Front Pharmacol. (2022) 13:969930. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.969930,

  • 45.

    Jha V Ganguli A Saha TK Kohli HS Sud K Gupta KL . A randomized, controlled trial of steroids and cyclophosphamide in adults with nephrotic syndrome caused by idiopathic membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2007) 18:1899904. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007020166,

  • 46.

    Scolari F Delbarba E Santoro D Gesualdo L Pani A Dallera N . Rituximab or cyclophosphamide in the treatment of membranous nephropathy: the RI-CYCLO randomized trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2021) 32:97282. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020071091,

  • 47.

    Mitrofanova A Merscher S Fornoni A . Kidney lipid dysmetabolism and lipid droplet accumulation in chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. (2023) 19:62945. doi: 10.1038/s41581-023-00741-w,

  • 48.

    Weldegiorgis M Woodward M . Correction: elevated triglycerides and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol are independently associated with the onset of advanced chronic kidney disease: a cohort study of 911,360 individuals from the United Kingdom. BMC Nephrol. (2022) 23:312. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02932-2,

  • 49.

    Ginley B Jen KY Han SS Rodrigues L Jain S Fogo AB . Automated computational detection of interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, and glomerulosclerosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2021) 32:83750. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020050652,

  • 50.

    Srivastava A Palsson R Kaze AD Chen ME Palacios P Sabbisetti V . The prognostic value of histopathologic lesions in native kidney biopsy specimens: results from the Boston kidney biopsy cohort study. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2018) 29:221324. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017121260,

Summary

Keywords

chronic kidney diseases, glomerulonephritis, immunoglobulin A nephropathy, immunosuppressive therapy, membranous nephropathy, kidney disease progression, minimal change disease, traditional chinese medicine

Citation

Zhang W, Dai Y, Zhang W, Wang Y and Wang L (2026) A retrospective single-center cohort study of major subtypes of primary glomerular diseases (MN, IgAN, and MCD): clinical characteristics, prognostic outcomes, and risk factors. Front. Med. 12:1741853. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1741853

Received

07 November 2025

Revised

25 December 2025

Accepted

29 December 2025

Published

14 January 2026

Volume

12 - 2025

Edited by

Xiaoyong Yu, Shaanxi Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China

Reviewed by

Peng Liu, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, China

Lan Wang, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Lihua Wang,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics