Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, and it is estimated that by 2040, 111.8 million people between the ages of 40 and 80 will be affected by the disease (1). Imaging technologies offer the ability to objectively quantify glaucomatous damage, allowing for early diagnosis and monitoring of progression over time, thus enabling appropriate disease management. Since Huang et al. introduced Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) in 1991 (2), using low-coherence interferometry to produce two-dimensional optical scattering images of the microstructures of internal ocular tissues, there has been a revolution in the structural assessment of retinal and optic nerve diseases through this technology. This Research Topic brings together four articles that cover different facets of imaging in glaucoma.
Li et al., using Swept-Source OCT (SS-OCT), demonstrated that the eyes of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and high myopia have the thinnest anterior scleral thickness, the shortest scleral spur, the thinnest trabecular meshwork, and the smallest Schlemm's canal compared to the eyes of patients with POAG and the eyes of patients with high myopia. Since the thinnest anterior scleral thickness might contribute to the shortest scleral spur and, consequently, to the thinnest trabecular meshwork and smallest Schlemm's canal in POAG eyes with high myopia, anterior scleral thickness may serve as a novel clinical indicator for the prediction and evaluation of POAG in high myopes. Furthermore, increased aqueous humor outflow resistance caused by the abnormal ocular anterior segment morphology in eyes of POAG patients with high myopia may also be a reason for the progression of visual field loss in this population.
In a retrospective case-control study conducted in the Hubei region, Wang et al. investigated the pathogenesis of primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) and its relationship to the anatomical structure of the anterior segment, obtaining biometric parameters through SS-OCT. They demonstrated that the eyes of patients with PACG have a smaller anterior segment space, narrower angles, a thicker lens, a thinner cornea, shorter axial length, a flatter cornea, and a more anteriorly positioned lens compared to the normal control group. The study highlights the significant discrepancies in anterior segment biometric parameters between patients with PACG and normal controls, reinforcing the notion that the pathogenesis of PACG is intrinsically linked to disparities in the anatomical configuration of the anterior segment. Since the eyes of PACG patients have a crowded anterior segment with a shallower anterior chamber depth and a narrowed angle, shorter axial length, and a thicker and more anterior lens, it is reasonable to emphasize the importance of the assessment of anterior segment biometric parameters using SS-OCT to stratify the risk of developing angle closure in at-risk eyes, enabling early intervention.
Although perimetry is a functional test and not an imaging modality in glaucoma itself, the automated and precise localization of predicted structural and functional information is now possible with new technologies, serving as a crucial initial step toward a more integrated diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma progression in terms of structure and function. That being said, Al-Nosairy et al. explored a novel kinetic method for visual field screening called rapid campimetry. It was designed to screen the central 10 degrees of the visual field, an important region in glaucoma. Rapid campimetry was found to be robust even under suboptimal testing conditions and demonstrated good to excellent reliability between testing visits, which highlights its promise as a screening test and potential upon proper future optimization.
The potential role of the microvasculature and blood flow in the pathophysiology of glaucoma has been extensively debated and investigated. In this context, OCT Angiography (OCTA) has emerged as an invaluable non-invasive imaging modality used to characterize the vasculature in retinal layers, supplying detailed data on the microvasculature of the optic nerve head and retina (3). Previous studies have demonstrated that OCTA vessel density is lower in glaucoma patients and is highly correlated with visual field indices (4–6). Shen et al. presented a comprehensive overview of OCTA applications in glaucoma, showing its current status and future directions. They also explored the role of OCTA in detecting, monitoring, and predicting glaucoma progression. The clinical translation of OCTA opens up a promising avenue for the early diagnosis, the monitoring of progression, and the assessment of treatment outcomes in glaucoma.
Advances in this field can help us continue to make significant progress in reducing the global impact of irreversible vision loss from glaucoma. For example, integrating artificial intelligence (AI) strategies with glaucoma imaging into clinical practice will enable the provision of high-quality care to a population that continues to increase in number and age (7). Considering the shortcomings related to the lack of objective criteria for glaucoma diagnosis, standardized guidelines aimed at clearly classifying images for glaucoma detection and monitoring can pave the way for the development of reliable AI models (8). The future incorporation of AI into healthcare models can help overcome current limitations in access to and timely treatment of glaucoma patients worldwide. Each of the above studies demonstrates the potential utility of imaging in glaucoma, and we hope that the articles in this Research Topic will contribute to the knowledge in this field.
Statements
Author contributions
AD-F: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AT: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CG: Writing rioriginal draft, Writing – review & editing. LS: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1.
Tham YC Li X Wong TY Quigley HA Aung T Cheng CY . Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. (2014) 121:2081–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013
2.
Huang D Swanson EA Lin CP Schuman JS Stinson WG Chang W et al . Optical coherence tomography. Science. (1991) 254:1178–81. doi: 10.1126/science.1957169
3.
Jia Y Tan O Tokayer J Potsaid B Wang Y Liu JJ et al . Split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography. Opt Express. (2012) 20:4710–25. doi: 10.1364/OE.20.004710
4.
Jia Y Wei E Wang X Zhang X Morrison JC Parikh M et al . Optical coherence tomography angiography of optic disc perfusion in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. (2014) 121:1322–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.021
5.
Yarmohammadi A Zangwill LM Diniz-Filho A Suh MH Manalastas PI Fatehee N et al . Optical coherence tomography angiography vessel density in healthy, glaucoma suspect, and glaucoma eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2016) 57:OCT451–9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18944
6.
Yarmohammadi A Zangwill LM Diniz-Filho A Suh MH Yousefi S Saunders LJ et al . Relationship between optical coherence tomography angiography vessel density and severity of visual field loss in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. (2016) 123:2498–508. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.08.041
7.
Mursch-Edlmayr AS Ng WS Diniz-Filho A Sousa DC Arnold L Schlenker MB et al . Artificial intelligence algorithms to diagnose glaucoma and detect glaucoma progression: translation to clinical practice. Transl Vis Sci Technol. (2020) 9:55. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.2.55
8.
Yang WH Xu YW Sun XH . Expert workgroup of guidelines for glaucoma imaging classification, annotation, and quality control for artificial intelligence applications. Guidelines for glaucoma imaging classification, annotation, and quality control for artificial intelligence applications. Int J Ophthalmol. (2025) 18:1181–96. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2025.07.01
Summary
Keywords
angle-closure glaucoma, glaucoma, open-angle glaucoma, optical coherence tomography, optical imaging, visual field
Citation
Diniz-Filho A, Tatham AJ, Gracitelli CPB and Sakata LM (2026) Editorial: Imaging in glaucoma. Front. Med. 12:1744373. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1744373
Received
11 November 2025
Revised
08 December 2025
Accepted
09 December 2025
Published
12 January 2026
Volume
12 - 2025
Edited and reviewed by
Weihua Yang, Southern Medical University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Diniz-Filho, Tatham, Gracitelli and Sakata.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alberto Diniz-Filho, adinizfilho@ufmg.br
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.