PERSPECTIVE article
Front. Med.
Sec. Healthcare Professions Education
This article is part of the Research TopicDissemination and Implementation Science in MedicineView all 30 articles
Bridging Evidence and Practice: Implementation Science and Bundled Care Strategies for Fluid Management in Critically Ill Neonates
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
- 2Department of Nephrology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
- 3Department of Epidemiology, Dartmouth Center for Implementation Science, Dartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, United States
- 4Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
- 5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, United States
- 6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, United States
- 7Dartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, United States
- 8Department of Biomedical Data Science, Dartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, United States
- 9Department of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
- 10Department of Pediatrics and Department of Epidemiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Fluid overload (FO) is a common and modifiable risk factor in critically ill neonates that is associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, multi-organ dysfunction, and increased mortality. Despite This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article substantial observational evidence and consensus-driven guidelines, standardized fluid management strategies are inconsistently applied across neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Early single-center studies suggest bundle feasibility and effectiveness but are limited in scope and generalizability. Such bundles integrate evidence-based interventions that collectively identify high-risk patients, track, prevent, and treat FO. A structured pathway is needed to enhance scalability and uptake, systematically address barriers, tailor strategies to local contexts, and engage interdisciplinary teams. Incorporating implementation science frameworks and electronic health record (EHR) data pipeline integration can strengthen adoption, fidelity, adaptation, and sustainability of these interventions across diverse NICU settings. Rather than presenting new efficacy data, this perspective focuses on the translational gap and maximizing how existing evidence can be operationalized through bundles, data infrastructure, and implementation science to enable future multicenter trials. Pragmatic, multicenter studies that utilize EHR-based approaches are needed to determine how to best implement fluid management strategies that improve patient-centered outcomes. Bridging the gap between evidence and implementation through collaborative, pragmatic research has the potential to meaningfully reduce FO-related morbidity and mortality and advance neonatal critical care.
Keywords: Bundled Care Interventions, Critically IllNeonates, Dissemination andImplementation Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Fluid management protocol, fluid overload, implementation science, pragmatic clinical studies
Received: 15 Sep 2025; Accepted: 30 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Pak, Neyra, Brown, Travers, Starr, Harer, Sullivan, MacKenzie, Colicchio, Griffin and Askenazi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Amelia C Pak
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
