ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Healthcare Professions Education

Multimodal Interprofessional Education vs. Digital Learning: Enhancing Mpox Preparedness in Saudi Nursing Students

  • 1. Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia

  • 2. College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia

  • 3. Port Said University, Port Said, Egypt

  • 4. Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

  • 5. Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia

  • 6. University of Bisha, Bishah, Saudi Arabia

  • 7. King Abdulaziz Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

  • 8. Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

  • 9. Alexandria University Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt

Article metrics

View details

173

Views

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Background: The global outbreak of monkeypox (Mpox) highlighted the urgent need for healthcare workforce readiness, particularly among nursing students who form a key frontline group yet often lack structured training for emerging infectious diseases. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a multimodal interprofessional educational intervention—compared with digital-only learning—in improving Mpox-related knowledge and self‑reported preparedness among Saudi nursing students. The intervention was informed by the Health Belief Model (HBM) to strengthen confidence and attitudes, and Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory (ELT) to guide the design of interactive workshops that promoted concrete experience, reflection, conceptualization, and active practice. Methods: A quasi-experimental study with propensity score matching (PSM) included 480 undergraduate nursing students from six Saudi universities. Participants were assigned to either a digital-only control group or a multimodal group combining digital modules with interprofessional workshops. PSM was performed using demographic, academic, geographic, and baseline outcome variables to ensure covariate balance (standardized mean differences < 0.10). Outcome measures included objectively assessed Mpox knowledge and validated scales for confidence, attitudes, and self-reported clinical practices. The Mpox Knowledge Assessment Questionnaire, adapted from validated infectious disease tools, demonstrated strong content validity (CVI = 0.94). Data analyses included descriptive and comparative statistics with sensitivity tests for non-normal distributions. Results: The multimodal group showed significantly greater improvements across all measured outcomes (p < 0.01). Knowledge gains were retained at four-month follow‑up, while confidence, attitudes, and self-reported practices demonstrated medium to large effect sizes (Cohen’s d = 0.58–0.78). Ceiling effects were observed in hand hygiene and PPE subdomains, where post-test scores approached 88% of the maximum. Conclusion: Integrating interprofessional experiential workshops with digital learning significantly enhanced nursing students’ Mpox preparedness, particularly in applied knowledge and self-efficacy. These findings support embedding multimodal experiential approaches into nursing curricula to strengthen readiness for emerging infectious disease threats.

Summary

Keywords

digital learning approach, experiential learning theory, health belief model, Monkeypox, multimodal Interprofessional education, nursing students, preparedness

Received

21 November 2025

Accepted

26 January 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Mersal, Megahed, Mohamed, Shahin, Mersal, Elagazzar, hassabelnaby, Mohammed, Khalil, Aldubikhi, Abdalla, Alamoudi and Sofar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Fathia Mersal; Ateya Megahed

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics