Ting Huang1†
Dahu Wang1†
Dan Jiang1Xuejing Lu2Lan Lin3
Yuyan Zhang1Xin Li1Yihong Hou1Hong Li4*
Xinquan Liu1*- 1Department of Ophthalmology, Longhua Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
- 2Eye School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
- 3Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China
- 4Department of Endocrinology, Longhua Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
Dry eye is the most common ocular surface disorder that is increasingly acknowledged to be associated with diabetes mellitus. Via metabolic dysregulation and neural injury, diabetes mellitus significantly increases the prevalence of dry eye, adversely affecting patients’ quality of life. At present, the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic dry eye are still facing challenges in clinical practice. This article outlines the prevalence and risk factors associated with diabetic dry eye, explores its underlying pathogenic mechanisms, such as advanced glycation end-product accumulation, oxidative stress, corneal neuropathy, and impaired neural regulation, which collectively disrupt the lacrimal functional unit, leading to reduced tear secretion and tear film instability. The clinical manifestations of diabetic dry eye are also reviewed. According to current literature, diagnostic strategies utilizing confocal microscopy and tear fluid biomarkers are proposed. In addition, this review summarizes recent therapeutic advances and potential intervention strategies for diabetic dry eye, with a focus on emerging mechanism-based treatments. Taken together, this review aims to advance research on diabetic dry eye and offer novel insights to support early diagnosis and precision therapy.
Graphical Abstract. Created in BioRender. Ting, H. (2026) https://BioRender.com/lv1m7hg.
1 Introduction
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a prevalent metabolic disorder with substantial implications for global public health. According to the International Diabetes Federation, the global prevalence of DM among adults aged 20–79 reached 10.5% (536.6 million individuals) in 2021 (1). This figure is projected to rise by approximately 2.5% annually (2), reaching 783.2 million by 2050 (1, 3). Beyond its systemic complications, DM has a profound impact on ocular health, notably contributing to an increased prevalence of dry eye (4, 5). Dry eye is a prevalent ocular surface condition characterized by symptoms such as dryness, foreign body sensation, burning, and fluctuating vision, which can significantly impair quality of life (6). Multiple studies have reported that individuals with DM exhibit a markedly higher prevalence of dry eye, with strong correlations to disease duration and glycemic control (7, 8).
Increasingly recognized as a distinct clinical entity, diabetic dry eye is characterized by complex pathogenesis and heterogeneous symptoms but lacks standardized diagnostic criteria. Current treatments remain predominantly empirical and fail to target the specific pathophysiology of the disease, thereby impeding timely diagnosis and effective management in clinical practice. The pathogenesis of dry eye involves interrelated processes such as tear hyposecretion, tear film instability, and ocular surface inflammation. In individuals with DM, metabolic dysregulation may lead to lacrimal gland dysfunction, corneal nerve damage, and pathological alterations in ocular surface cells, thereby collectively elevating the risk of dry eye syndrome (9, 10). Moreover, DM can exacerbate ocular surface disease by inducing chronic inflammation (11). Recent research has increasingly emphasized marked differences in the clinical manifestations and pathological mechanisms of dry eye between diabetic and non-diabetic populations (12, 13). These findings establish a theoretical framework for the development of targeted management strategies for diabetic dry eye.
Consequently, a comprehensive synthesis of the epidemiology, classification, pathogenesis, diagnostic advances, and therapeutic progress in diabetic dry eye is essential for guiding clinical practice and promoting further research. This review aims to provide clinicians and researchers with an integrated reference to support precision diagnosis and treatment, thereby improving ocular surface health and quality of life in affected individuals.
2 Epidemiology
DM has been identified as a major systemic risk factor for dry eye (14). Epidemiological data indicate a wide global prevalence of dry eye, ranging from 5 to 50% (15). DM increases the risk of developing dry eye by 2- to 3-fold, with prevalence rates exceeding 50% in diabetic populations (16–18). Several studies have shown associations between the occurrence of diabetic dry eye and various factors, such as patient age, blood glucose levels, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and the duration of DM (7, 18, 19). However, the available evidence is not entirely consistent. A meta-analysis reported that elderly patients with diabetes exhibit better tear function than younger patients (23). While other studies have not observed a significant association between diabetes duration or random blood glucose levels and dry eye (20, 21).
In this context, accumulating evidence suggests that long-term glycemic control may be a key determinant of ocular surface health. Derakhshan et al. proposed that poor glycemic control is an important factor contributing to ocular surface damage in patients with diabetes (22). Consistent with this, a meta-analysis by Kuo et al. demonstrated that diabetic patients with well-controlled glycemia exhibit tear function comparable to that of non-diabetic individuals (23). Based on these findings, HbA1c is considered a relatively stable and independent risk factor for diabetic dry eye (19), with higher HbA1c levels being associated with an increased risk of the condition (24). Consequently, dry eye assessments ought to be systematically integrated into ocular examinations for patients exhibiting poor glycemic control.
Beyond glycemic control, diabetic dry eye is also closely associated with multiple microvascular complications. Previous studies have shown that the prevalence of dry eye is significantly increased in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic nephropathy (DN). A cross-sectional study involving 105 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus reported an overall dry eye prevalence of 43.81%, and notably, 61.96% of patients with dry eye were found to have proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), suggesting that the presence of dry eye may be associated with the severity of DR (24). Tran et al. (19) reported a significantly higher prevalence of dry eye among patients with DN compared with those without renal complications, and a reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was identified as an independent risk factor for the development of dry eye. In addition to shared metabolic and inflammatory mechanisms, the accumulation of systemic metabolic products and toxins secondary to renal dysfunction may further disrupt ocular surface homeostasis and promote the development of dry eye (25, 26). These findings suggest that ocular surface alterations associated with diabetes may precede the development of other microvascular complications in some patients, offering potential insights for the early detection of diabetic complications.
3 Pathogenesis
3.1 Mechanisms underlying hyperglycemia-induced ocular surface damage
Metabolic dysfunction associated with diabetes can lead to degenerative alterations in ocular vasculature and neural structures, thereby promoting the onset and progression of dry eye (27). These processes are largely driven by metabolic imbalance, oxidative stress, and chronic inflammation (28); a clearer understanding of their interrelationships is essential for early recognition and optimal management of diabetic dry eye. As a central driving factor, sustained hyperglycemia promotes the diversion of excess glucose from glycolysis into the polyol and hexosamine pathways, thereby markedly exacerbating oxidative stress and facilitating the abnormal accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) (10, 29, 30). These metabolic abnormalities activate pattern recognition receptors, such as the receptor for AGEs (RAGE) and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), subsequently triggering downstream inflammatory signaling pathways, such as NF-κB, MAPK, and JAK/STAT. The activation of these pathways results in aberrant expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases, disrupts corneal nerve homeostasis, and induces apoptosis and functional impairment of corneal epithelial cells, lacrimal glands, and other ocular surface-related cells (31–34), thereby driving the initiation and progression of diabetic dry eye.
A systematic review encompassing 30 studies with a total of 871 participants identified a range of tear fluid biomarkers that may reflect diabetes-related ocular surface alterations. These included cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and MMP-9), neuropeptides (substance P and neuropeptide Y), proteins (IGFBP-3 and progranulin), as well as lipids, glycans, microRNAs, circular RNAs, and trace elements (35). In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) studies have further demonstrated a significantly increased density of dendritic cells (DCs) in the corneas of patients with diabetic retinopathy, accompanied by impaired corneal nerve parameters and aggravated dry eye symptoms (36). As key antigen-presenting cells, activated DCs recruit CD4+ T cells, particularly Th1 and Th17 subsets, which secrete interferon-γ (IFN-γ), interleukin-17 (IL-17), IL-1β, and IL-6 into the tear film. This process leads to increased tear osmolarity and further amplification of local inflammatory responses (37–39). Concurrently, hyperglycemia-induced inflammation and oxidative stress can sustain the activation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), thereby promoting the degradation of corneal epithelial components and tight junction proteins and ultimately compromising the ocular surface barrier. Progranulin (PGRN) is a glycoprotein that plays an important role in maintaining ocular surface homeostasis through its anti-inflammatory and tissue-protective properties (40, 41). Zhou et al. compared tear PGRN levels between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy controls and found that PGRN concentrations were significantly reduced in diabetic patients. Moreover, tear PGRN levels were positively correlated with corneal nerve parameters, tear breakup time (TBUT), and Schirmer test scores (36), suggesting that reduced PGRN may weaken endogenous negative feedback regulation of ocular surface inflammation.
In the setting of persistent metabolic dysregulation and chronic inflammation, corneal nerves are among the earliest structures to be affected (42). Given their essential role in corneal sensation, reflex tear secretion, and ocular surface homeostasis, clarification of the mechanisms driving corneal neuropathy in diabetes is fundamental to understanding the pathological basis of diabetic ocular disease.
3.2 Corneal neuropathy
Corneal nerve axon terminals are enriched with mitochondria and exhibit high metabolic demands, rendering neurons particularly susceptible to oxidative stress–induced injury (43). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) can directly damage neuronal membrane lipids, mitochondrial DNA, and axonal transport–related proteins, thereby triggering axonal degeneration and neuronal apoptosis. Compared with non-diabetic individuals, patients with early diabetic peripheral neuropathy exhibit significant reductions in corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD), and corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL) (44–46). IVCM has further revealed the diminished “beaded” morphology of corneal nerve fibers in diabetic patients, which is indicative of nerve damage or degeneration. This reduction suggests impaired metabolic function and degenerative changes in the corneal nerves (47).
Corneal nerves are predominantly sensory nerves, primarily responsible for perceiving external stimuli and maintaining tear film distribution and ocular surface homeostasis through the regulation of the blink reflex. Mvilongo et al. (48) assessed corneal sensitivity using the Cochet–Bonnet esthesiometer and found significantly reduced sensitivity in diabetic patients (44.56 ± 9.59 mm) compared with non-diabetic controls (53.59 ± 6.30 mm). Similar results have been reported elsewhere (49). Corneal hypoesthesia leads to reduced blink frequency and amplitude, thereby compromising ocular surface protection and lubrication. As corneal nerve damage progresses, sensory function further declines, giving rise to a clinical phenotype characterized by prominent objective corneal signs in the presence of relatively mild subjective symptoms. This symptom–sign discordance, which is frequently observed in diabetic dry eye, may delay disease recognition and timely intervention (50, 51). Beyond sensory transduction, corneal sensory nerves release neuroregulatory mediators, such as substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), which promote corneal epithelial cell migration and proliferation, enhance tight junction integrity, and suppress local inflammatory responses, thereby preserving ocular surface barrier function. Under diabetic conditions, corneal nerve degeneration and reduced neuropeptide secretion may impair neuroepithelial interactions, clinically manifesting as persistent punctate epithelial erosions (52–54).
Meanwhile, the autonomic nervous system innervating the lacrimal glands, meibomian glands, and goblet cells also plays a critical role in maintaining ocular surface homeostasis (55–58). Parasympathetic nerve terminals innervating the lacrimal gland release neurotransmitters such as acetylcholine (ACh), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and norepinephrine (NE), which bind to cholinergic, VIP, and α1-adrenergic receptors on acinar and ductal epithelial cells. This interaction stimulates the secretion of water, electrolytes, and proteins (55, 59). In diabetic models, increased sympathetic innervation and decreased parasympathetic activity result in excessive NE release, activation of α1-adrenergic receptors, mitochondrial dysfunction, and reduced tear production (60, 61). Studies have demonstrated that pharmacological inhibition of sympathetic neural pathways or blockade of α₁-adrenergic receptors can effectively alleviate ocular surface damage and improve tear secretion (62). Consequently, restoration of lacrimal gland neural regulation and preservation of the structural and functional integrity of corneal sensory nerves are of critical importance in the management of diabetic dry eye (63).
3.3 Lacrimal functional unit dysfunction
The lacrimal functional unit (LFU) consists of the cornea, conjunctiva, lacrimal glands, eyelids, and their associated neural pathways, which together coordinate the production, distribution, and stability of the tear film. Under diabetic conditions, sustained hyperglycemia can markedly disrupt both the structural integrity and regulatory function of the LFU, leading to tear film homeostatic imbalance. In multiple diabetic animal models, diabetic rodents have been shown to exhibit a significant reduction in lacrimal gland weight, accompanied by abnormal glandular differentiation and increased cellular apoptosis, along with a marked decrease in conjunctival goblet cell density on the ocular surface (4, 64–66). Further studies have shown that early ocular alterations in diabetic mice predominantly involve the lacrimal glands, followed by dysfunction of conjunctival goblet cells and subsequent morphological changes in the cornea (67). In addition, non-invasive meibomian gland imaging has revealed varying degrees of gland dropout and atrophy in patients with diabetes, with severity closely associated with longer disease duration and poor metabolic control (68, 69). Together with the aforementioned corneal neuropathy and neural regulatory abnormalities, these findings indicate that LFU dysfunction plays a central role in the development and progression of diabetic dry eye. Accordingly, characterization of structural and functional alterations across LFU components may facilitate interpretation of disease phenotypes and guide targeted interventions (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Pathogenesis of diabetic dry eye. Molecular mechanisms primarily encompass damage to corneal nerves and epithelial cells mediated by glycolytic pathway dysregulation. Metabolic disturbances induce mitochondrial dysfunction via the accumulation of AGEs, activation of the polyol pathway, and oxidative stress, thereby eliciting ocular surface inflammation and apoptosis (A). Diabetic nerve fiber injury results in demyelination and neuronal apoptosis, clinically manifesting as decreased corneal sensitivity and impaired blink reflex. Corneal nerve dysfunction reduces trophic support to epithelial cells, leading to persistent corneal fluorescein staining. Autonomic nerve impairment further disrupts ocular surface innervation, thereby exacerbating the dry eye vicious cycle (B). Illustration of the normal ocular surface anatomy (C). Diabetic injury decreases tear secretion from the lacrimal gland, induces damage to the meibomian glands, leading to lipid deficiency, and promotes conjunctival epithelial phosphorylation along with goblet cell loss, thereby resulting in mucin deficiency. Collectively, these alterations contribute to the development of diabetic dry eye (D). Created in BioRender. Ting, H. (2026) https://BioRender.com/kwlpdzg.
3.4 Decreased tear secretion and altered tear composition
The tear film, composed of mucin, aqueous, and lipid layers, also contains antimicrobial proteins, enzymes, electrolytes, and metabolites that collectively uphold ocular surface defense and stability (5). A meta-analysis confirmed a significant reduction in tear secretion among diabetic patients compared with non-diabetic controls. Subgroup analyses further verified this difference after adjusting for potential confounders (23). These findings suggest that, at early stages of the disease, diabetic dry eye may predominantly present as an aqueous-deficient subtype (64, 67).
In addition to reduced aqueous tear secretion, diabetic patients frequently exhibit evaporative dry eye secondary to meibomian gland dysfunction (70, 71). The lipid layer of the tear film is primarily secreted by the meibomian glands and functions to reduce tear evaporation and minimize ocular surface shear stress. Hyperglycemia-related metabolic disturbances and structural alterations of the glands can disrupt the integrity of the tear film lipid layer. In vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy studies have demonstrated cytological and compositional abnormalities in the meibum of patients with diabetes (72). Clinical studies have further reported increased meibomian gland dropout in diabetic patients compared with healthy controls, accompanied by reduced lipid layer thickness and decreased tear meniscus height (73, 74).
The mucin layer on the ocular surface consists of membrane-bound, secreted, and tethered mucins, which work synergistically to preserve a hydrated, lubricated, and pathogen-resistant barrier at the tear–epithelium interface (75). In diabetes, damage to the epithelial cells alters mucin organization and decreases its presence in the tear film, compromising tear stability and epithelial protection (76–78).
Beyond structural compromise of the aqueous, mucin, and lipid layers, diabetic tear fluid also shows elevated glucose levels and diminished lysosomal content (79). Dysfunction of the LFU increases the expression of immune cells, immunoglobulins, metabolic waste, and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the tear film, while reducing levels of neurotrophic factors (80–83). These compositional shifts likely contribute to the elevated tear osmolarity observed in diabetic dry eye. (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Comparison of tear film structure and composition between individuals with normal glucose tolerance and patients with diabetes. Created in BioRender. Ting, H. (2026) https://BioRender.com/cut04gk.
4 Diagnosis
4.1 Manifestations
A descriptive hospital-based study identified foreign body sensation and blurred vision as the most commonly reported complaints (84). Han et al. further reported that, in patients with diabetic dry eye, SPEED scores were significantly negatively correlated with corneal nerve density as well as the length and number of major nerve fibers. In contrast, non-invasive tear breakup time (NIBUT) and Schirmer I test (SIt) wetting length showed positive correlations with the density and number of major corneal nerve fibers (85). Overall, diabetic dry eye is associated with more severe symptoms and ocular surface damage than non-diabetic dry eye, in close relation to structural changes in corneal nerves (86–89). However, these non-specific ocular discomforts and routine clinical signs are often regarded as minor and consequently overlooked, thereby increasing the risk of underdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis of diabetic dry eye. Notably, as the disease progresses, severe corneal nerve damage may lead to a marked reduction in sensory input, such that subjective symptom perception can be attenuated even in the presence of significantly elevated tear osmolarity (90, 91). This phenomenon indicates that reliance on symptom-based questionnaires alone may be insufficient for the accurate identification of diabetic dry eye. Therefore, comprehensive evaluation strategies that incorporate the distinct pathophysiological features of diabetic dry eye are warranted in diabetic populations to enable more accurate diagnosis and timely intervention.
4.2 Diagnostic strategies
In addition to the common tear film and ocular surface abnormalities shared with other dry eye subtypes, corneal sensitivity should be regarded as a specific diagnostic indicator for diabetic dry eye. However, ocular tissue damage associated with DM may initiate as early as the impaired glucose tolerance stage (58, 92). A marked decline in corneal sensation typically signifies more advanced disease progression. Earlier and more timely differential diagnosis can be facilitated through the use of IVCM and tear biomarker analysis (45).
IVCM enables real-time, high-resolution imaging of corneal microstructures, with particular emphasis on the inferior whorl region of the sub-basal nerve plexus (SNP). This site is widely recognized as a reliable location for assessing corneal nerve architecture and early neurodegenerative alterations (93, 94). Recent advances in wide-field imaging have further improved spatial resolution, contributing to a more refined understanding of diabetic corneal neuropathy (95). Despite its diagnostic utility, IVCM remains a contact-based technique. In patients with epithelial fragility, as frequently seen in diabetes, the procedure may increase the risk of epithelial complications, such as persistent defects or ulceration (57). In addition, its high cost and limited accessibility constrain broader clinical implementation, underscoring the need for more scalable and widely available diagnostic strategies (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Comparison of corneal sub-basal nerve plexus morphology between normal individuals and diabetic patients. Representative IVCM images of the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus are shown. Panels (A1,A2) illustrate the central and peripheral corneal regions in normal individuals, respectively, demonstrating a well-organized inferior whorl pattern, thick nerve fibers, high nerve density, and abundant nerve branching. Panels (B1,B2) show the corresponding regions in patients with diabetes, characterized by structural disorganization of the inferior whorl region, reduced nerve fiber density, shorter and thinner nerve fibers, decreased branching, increased nerve fiber tortuosity, and fewer nerve beadings. Blue arrows indicate the inferior whorl region. Orange circles highlight infiltrating inflammatory cells. Red brackets and purple arrows denote nerve beadings, which are reduced in diabetic corneas. These morphological alterations reflect corneal nerve impairment associated with chronic hyperglycemia and are frequently observed in diabetic dry eye disease. Scale bars = 50 μm. Created in BioRender. Ting, H. (2026) https://BioRender.com/nvj04as.
Tear fluid contains a complex repertoire of biomolecules, providing a unique and non-invasive means to investigate ocular surface pathophysiology. The ease of collection, dynamic composition, and rich molecular content have established tear-based biomarkers as promising tools for precise diagnosis and management in a variety of clinical conditions (96). Tear samples collected via glass capillaries or Schirmer strips can be rapidly profiled using integrated multi-omics techniques to quantify cytokines, proteins, and microRNAs (80, 97). This approach exhibits high reliability in differentiating disease states (98). In diabetic dry eye, consistently altered tear levels of IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, MMP-9, SP, neuropeptide Y, IGFBP-3, and progranulin have been reported, highlighting their potential as specific biomarkers (35, 36, 99–101). These insights support a move from broad-spectrum therapies toward personalized treatment strategies, which may redefine the management of ocular surface diseases.
In the early stages, diabetic dry eye may present with non-specific ocular discomfort, whereas at more advanced stages, it can manifest as a clinical pattern in which subjective symptoms are relatively attenuated despite progressive tissue damage, thereby increasing the risk of underdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis. Evidence from animal studies (102) suggests that ocular surface damage may be at least partially reversible when relevant pathological processes are appropriately modulated, highlighting the potential value of implementing early screening strategies in diabetic populations. Kalra et al. (103) were among the pioneers to propose integrating dry eye evaluations, as outlined in the TFOS DEWS II framework, into routine diabetes care. They emphasized that all patients with diabetes, particularly those with elevated HbA1c levels, DR, or DN, should undergo comprehensive ocular surface evaluations at least annually to enable the early detection of subclinical abnormalities. Diagnostic accuracy may be enhanced by incorporating corneal nerve imaging, tear-based biomarkers, and corneal sensitivity testing, thereby facilitating more personalized therapeutic strategies. However, this approach is still in its infancy, and standardized thresholds and grading criteria for these biomarkers remain to be established.
5 Treatment
Clinical management of dry eye typically follows expert consensus guidelines, focusing on treatments tailored to underlying etiologies and individualized according to disease subtype and severity (14). Optimal glycemic control rapidly enhances tear film stability; when combined with artificial tears, meibomian gland hygiene, and corneal epithelial barrier restoration, it can significantly alleviate symptoms (104–106). However, conventional dry eye therapies often fall short of addressing diabetes-specific pathophysiological mechanisms, which may partly account for the limited and recurrent clinical efficacy observed in diabetic patients. As insights into the mechanisms of diabetes-associated ocular surface damage continue to deepen, an increasing number of targeted therapeutic approaches have begun to emerge.
5.1 Baseline management and glycemic control
Clinical studies suggest that sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists may exert protective effects on the ocular surface, with their use being associated with a lower risk of dry eye. Specifically, SGLT2 inhibitors have been demonstrated to mitigate dry eye severity and reduce corneal dendritic cell density, whereas GLP-1 receptor agonists may lower the incidence of superficial punctate keratitis (107–110). Although the relationships between metformin or pioglitazone and dry eye warrant further elucidation, existing data indicate that metformin may improve corneal nerve parameters and modulate neuroimmune status, suggesting potential neuroprotective effects in diabetic patients (111). Moreover, pioglitazone and basal insulin therapy have shown efficacy in promoting corneal nerve regeneration (112). Collectively, these antidiabetic agents hold promise for maintaining ocular surface integrity and provide a basis for personalized glycemic control strategies in the management of diabetic dry eye.
5.2 Neurotrophic and neuromodulatory therapies
In a randomized, double-blind trial, the combination of topical citicoline and vitamin B12 significantly enhanced corneal sensitivity and alleviated ocular symptoms in diabetic patients (113). Nerve growth factor (NGF) has been demonstrated in both in vivo and in vitro studies to promote corneal epithelial repair and enhance tear secretion (114). Recombinant human NGF (rhNGF) has been approved for the treatment of neurotrophic keratitis, suggesting the potential applicability of neurotrophic strategies in corneal-related disorders (115). In addition, intranasal neurostimulation, as a device-based therapeutic approach, can improve tear secretion and tear film stability by activating lacrimal reflex pathways (116–118). However, evidence supporting its application in diabetic dry eye remains limited, and its clinical use in this context is still largely exploratory.
Recent insights from Professor Lixin Xie’s team indicate that sympathetic overactivation contributes to mitochondrial dysfunction in the lacrimal gland, with α1-adrenergic receptors playing a key role in tear secretion regulation (10). Preclinical studies reveal that α1-adrenergic antagonists improve tear production and mitigate meibomian gland and goblet cell dysfunction in diabetic models (65). These findings uncover a novel neuro-energetic pathway influencing tear secretion. Ongoing clinical trials led by Professor Xie aim to translate these discoveries into targeted therapies for diabetic dry eye.
5.3 Secretagogues
Diquafosol sodium is a P2Y₂ receptor agonist that promotes tear fluid and mucin secretion, thereby improving tear film stability (63). An exploratory study in patients with type 2 diabetic dry eye demonstrated that diquafosol sodium improved tear film parameters and alleviated clinical symptoms (119). Subsequent randomized controlled trials further indicated that 3% diquafosol sodium may offer advantages over sodium hyaluronate in enhancing tear film stability and increasing corneal nerve density (120). It should be noted that Diquafosol ophthalmic solution is not a direct anti-inflammatory or neurotrophic agent, and the observed improvements in corneal nerve parameters are more likely secondary to restoration of the ocular surface microenvironment and tear film homeostasis.
5.4 Anti-inflammatory therapy
Anti-inflammatory therapy remains a foundational strategy in managing diabetic dry eye, targeting both ocular surface injury and tear film instability. Conventional agents, such as cyclosporine, short-term corticosteroids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), effectively suppress inflammatory cascades, thereby preserving goblet cell integrity and supporting tear film homeostasis. However, prolonged use of these agents may compromise corneal epithelial health and diminish corneal sensitivity, potentially limiting their long-term suitability in diabetic populations (121).
Topical ocular insulin has been shown to downregulate proinflammatory mediators, such as IL-1α, IL-6, and MMP-9, while concurrently improving symptoms and enhancing tear production in patients with diabetes (122). In addition, a composite formulation containing chondroitin sulfate and myo-inositol has been reported to improve corneal sensitivity, prolong tear breakup time, and reduce OSDI scores, potentially through modulation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway (123). However, the current evidence supporting these interventions remains limited.
5.5 Antioxidant therapy
Oxidative stress plays an important role in the initiation and progression of diabetic dry eye. In a randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 6 months of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation significantly increased corneal nerve fiber length in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (124). Similarly, clinical data indicate that co-administration of α-lipoic acid with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) results in greater improvements in TBUT, OSDI scores, tear film morphology, and corneal staining compared to HPMC alone (125). The therapeutic effects of α-lipoic acid are largely attributed to its potent antioxidative capacity, such as ROS scavenging, metal-ion chelation, and enhancement of endogenous antioxidant systems, ultimately promoting corneal nerve health in diabetic individuals (126). These findings highlight the potential of targeted antioxidant therapy to mitigate ocular surface damage and support neural repair in diabetic dry eye.
5.6 Emerging and preclinical strategies
Acupuncture is a traditional therapeutic modality with a history of more than two millennia. Neuroanatomical studies have confirmed that acupoints and meridians are densely innervated, and their stimulation triggers the release of neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, and immune mediators, thereby modulating sensory input, inflammation, and systemic balance (127, 128). Increasing evidence underscores acupuncture’s crucial role in neural repair, stimulating nerve regeneration and axonal sprouting through the activation of neurotrophic factors (129, 130). Acupuncture has demonstrated potential benefits in alleviating dry eye symptoms and improving tear film stability, and several meta-analyses indicate that acupuncture combined with artificial tears may be more effective than control treatments alone (131). However, high-quality clinical evidence specifically supporting its efficacy in diabetic dry eye remains limited.
Other therapeutic approaches, such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonists (132), probiotics (133), and modulation of the OGF–OGFR growth regulatory axis (102, 134), have exhibited potential in preclinical diabetic dry eye models. However, these findings predominantly originate from animal studies, and further well-designed clinical trials are necessary to confirm their safety and efficacy in humans.
6 Conclusion and future directions
Diabetic dry eye is highly prevalent, particularly among patients with suboptimal glycemic control. The pathogenesis of this condition is multifactorial, primarily driven by glucose-induced corneal neuropathy, which results in dysfunction of the LFU, decreased tear production, and altered tear composition. These pathological processes often lack specific symptoms in the early stages of the disease, but can present as a clinical phenotype characterized by “relatively mild symptoms but significant tissue damage” during the progression stage. This highlights the importance of conducting regular ocular surface screening in the diabetic population.
In clinical practice, the early identification rate of diabetic dry eye should be improved by combining corneal sensation assessment, in vivo confocal microscopy examination based on the inferior whorl region of the SNP, and the detection of tear fluid biomarkers (such as IL-6, MMP-9, and P substance). While current therapies primarily focus on symptom alleviation, emerging treatments targeting underlying mechanisms, such as glycemic control, neuroregulation, anti-inflammation, and antioxidation, have shown promising outcomes. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to better define the optimal target populations, dosing regimens, and long-term efficacy of these interventions.
Currently, diabetic dry eye lacks universally accepted diagnostic criteria and is predominantly diagnosed based on clinical features. This absence of standardized definitions complicates patient characterization and limits the clarity of therapeutic outcomes in clinical trials. Establishing consensus on disease nomenclature and quantifiable diagnostic benchmarks will enhance the precision of study results and clarify the relationship between disease pathophysiology and treatment mechanisms in randomized controlled trials. Future efforts should prioritize the standardization of clinical definitions and diagnostic protocols for diabetic dry eye, aligned with current diabetes management guidelines, to support more reliable data integration and comparability across studies.
Author contributions
TH: Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. DW: Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing. DJ: Investigation, Writing – original draft. XuL: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing. YZ: Investigation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. LL: Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. XiL: Investigation, Writing – original draft. YH: Investigation, Writing – original draft. HL: Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing. XinL: Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was supported by the Longhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (No. KC2026004) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2023YFC3503003).
Acknowledgments
The authors thank BioRender1 for providing the graphic design platform used to create the scientific illustrations in this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
References
1. Sun, H, Saeedi, P, Karuranga, S, Pinkepank, M, Ogurtsova, K, Duncan, BB, et al. IDF diabetes atlas: global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2022) 183:109119. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119,
2. Kotwas, A, Karakiewicz, B, Zabielska, P, Wieder-Huszla, S, and Jurczak, A. Epidemiological factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus: evidence from the global burden of disease. Arch Public Health. (2021) 79:110. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00632-1,
3. GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Lancet. (2023) 402:203–34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01301-6
4. Weng, J, Ross, C, Baker, J, Alfuraih, S, Shamloo, K, and Sharma, A. Diabetes-associated hyperglycemia causes rapid-onset ocular surface damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2023) 64:11. doi: 10.1167/iovs.64.14.11,
5. Bron, AJ, de Paiva, CS, Chauhan, SK, Bonini, S, Gabison, EE, Jain, S, et al. TFOS DEWS II pathophysiology report. Ocul Surf. (2017) 15:438–510. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.011
6. Morthen, MK, Magno, MS, Utheim, TP, Snieder, H, Jansonius, N, Hammond, CJ, et al. The vision-related burden of dry eye. Ocul Surf. (2022) 23:207–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2021.10.007
7. Brar, GK, Bawa, M, Chadha, C, Gupta, T, and Kaur, H. Proportion of dry eye in type II diabetics. J Family Med Prim Care. (2024) 13:1311–5. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1268_23,
8. Zhmud, T, Drozhzhyna, G, and Malachkova, N. Evaluation and comparison of subjective and objective anterior ocular surface damage in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and dry eye disease. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2023) 261:447–52. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05806-3,
9. Xue, JF, Dong, YL, Zhou, QJ, and Xie, LX. Research progress of diabetic corneal neuropathy. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. (2021) 57:630–6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20210207-00086
10. Zhou, Q, Yang, L, Wang, Q, Li, Y, Wei, C, and Xie, L. Mechanistic investigations of diabetic ocular surface diseases. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2022) 13:1079541. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1079541,
11. Zhmud, T, Barabino, S, and Drozhzhyna, G. Expression of CD15 in the bulbar conjunctiva among T2DM patients with ocular surface damage. Eur J Ophthalmol. (2025) 35:1614–20. doi: 10.1177/11206721251327642,
12. Wang, X, Fang, J, and Yang, L. Research progress on ocular complications caused by type 2 diabetes mellitus and the function of tears and blepharons. Open Life Sci. (2024) 19:20220773. doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0773,
13. Locatelli, EVT, Huang, JJ, Mangwani-Mordani, S, Tovar Vetencourt, AA, and Galor, A. Individuals with diabetes mellitus have a dry eye phenotype driven by low symptom burden and anatomic abnormalities. J Clin Med. (2023) 12:6535. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206535,
14. Cornea Group of Ophthalmology Branch of Chinese Medical Association, Cornea Group of Chinese Ophthalmologist Association. Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of dry eye (2024). Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. (2024) 60:968–76. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20240517-00227
15. Stapleton, F, Alves, M, Bunya, VY, Jalbert, I, Lekhanont, K, Malet, F, et al. TFOS DEWS II epidemiology report. Ocul Surf. (2017) 15:334–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003,
16. Naik, K, Magdum, R, Ahuja, A, Kaul, S, S, J, Mishra, A, et al. Ocular surface diseases in patients with diabetes. Cureus. (2022) 14:e23401. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23401
17. Almohammed, BA, Alnafeesah, AA, Aldharman, SS, Alenzi, MH, Mahjari, AA, Albalawi, FA, et al. Prevalence and severity of dry eye disease symptoms among diabetics: a nationwide survey. Cureus. (2022) 14:e30981. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30981
18. Bashorun, SD, Balogun, BG, Ibidapo, O, and Bashorun, AO. Prevalence of dry eye disease in type 2 diabetic and non-diabetics: a cross-sectional hospital-based study. J West Afr Coll Surg. (2024) 14:180–7. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_100_23,
19. Tran Tat, T, Ngo Duc, K, Pham Hong, P, Nguyen Sa, H, Nguyen Trung, K, Nguyen Thi Thu, H, et al. Dry eye and some related factors in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy: a cross-sectional study in Vietnam. Clin Ophthalmol. (2024) 18:1217–24. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S458633,
20. Nadeem, H, Malik, TG, Mazhar, A, and Ali, A. Association of dry eye disease with diabetic retinopathy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. (2020) 30:493–7. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.05.493
21. Pan, L-Y, Kuo, Y-K, Chen, T-H, and Sun, C-C. Dry eye disease in patients with type II diabetes mellitus: a retrospective, population-based cohort study in Taiwan. Front Med (Lausanne). (2022) 9:980714. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.980714,
22. Derakhshan, A, Abrishami, M, Khajedaluee, M, Omidtabrizi, A, and Moghaddam, SG. Comparison between tear film Osmolar Cocentration and other tear film function parameters in patients with diabetes mellitus. Korean J Ophthalmol. (2019) 33:326–32. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2013.0146,
23. Kuo, Y-K, Shao, S-C, Lin, E-T, Pan, L-Y, Yeung, L, and Sun, C-C. Tear function in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2022) 13:1036002. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1036002,
24. Mansuri, F, Bhole, PK, and Parmar, D. Study of dry eye disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus and its association with diabetic retinopathy in Western India. Indian J Ophthalmol. (2023) 71:1463–7. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2770_22,
25. Tummanapalli, SS, Issar, T, Yan, A, Kwai, N, Poynten, AM, Krishnan, AV, et al. Corneal nerve fiber loss in diabetes with chronic kidney disease. Ocul Surf. (2020) 18:178–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2019.11.010,
26. Asiedu, K, Dhanapalaratnam, R, Krishnan, AV, Kwai, N, Poynten, A, and Markoulli, M. Impact of peripheral and corneal neuropathy on markers of ocular surface discomfort in diabetic chronic kidney disease. Optom Vis Sci. (2022) 99:807–16. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001955,
27. Pieńczykowska, K, Bryl, A, and Mrugacz, M. Link between metabolic syndrome, inflammation, and eye diseases. Int J Mol Sci. (2025) 26:2174. doi: 10.3390/ijms26052174,
28. Singh, I, Poynten, AM, Krishnan, AV, Willcox, MDP, and Markoulli, M. The ocular surface in type 2 diabetes: pathophysiology and impact of anti-diabetic drugs. Prog Retin Eye Res. (2025) 110:101417. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2025.101417
29. Zhou, T, Lee, A, Lo, ACY, and Kwok, JSWJ. Diabetic corneal neuropathy: pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Front Pharmacol. (2022) 13:816062. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.816062,
30. Khalid, M, Petroianu, G, and Adem, A. Advanced glycation end products and diabetes mellitus: mechanisms and perspectives. Biomolecules. (2022) 12:542. doi: 10.3390/biom12040542,
31. Garg, SS, and Gupta, J. Polyol pathway and redox balance in diabetes. Pharmacol Res. (2022) 182:106326. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106326,
32. Niimi, N, Yako, H, Takaku, S, Chung, SK, and Sango, K. Aldose reductase and the polyol pathway in Schwann cells: old and new problems. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:1031. doi: 10.3390/ijms22031031,
33. Kaur, M, Misra, S, Swarnkar, P, Patel, P, Das Kurmi, B, Das Gupta, G, et al. Understanding the role of hyperglycemia and the molecular mechanism associated with diabetic neuropathy and possible therapeutic strategies. Biochem Pharmacol. (2023) 215:115723. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2023.115723,
34. Veluthakal, R, Esparza, D, Hoolachan, JM, Balakrishnan, R, Ahn, M, Oh, E, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and inter-organ miscommunications in T2D progression. Int J Mol Sci. (2024) 25:1504. doi: 10.3390/ijms25031504,
35. Gospodarczyk, N, Martyka, A, Błaszczyk, U, Czuj, W, Piekarska, J, Wylęgała, E, et al. Tear fluid biomarkers in diabetic ocular surface disease: a systematic review. J Clin Med. (2025) 14:6958. doi: 10.3390/jcm14196958,
36. Zhou, T, Dou, Z, Cai, Y, Zhu, D, and Fu, Y. Tear fluid Progranulin as a noninvasive biomarker for the monitoring of corneal innervation changes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Transl Vis Sci Technol. (2024) 13:9. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.7.9,
37. Levine, H, Hwang, J, Dermer, H, Mehra, D, Feuer, W, and Galor, A. Relationships between activated dendritic cells and dry eye symptoms and signs. Ocul Surf. (2021) 21:186–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2021.06.001,
38. Kumar, NR, Praveen, M, Narasimhan, R, Khamar, P, D’Souza, S, Sinha-Roy, A, et al. Tear biomarkers in dry eye disease: progress in the last decade. Indian J Ophthalmol. (2023) 71:1190–202. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2981_22,
39. Chu, L, Wang, C, and Zhou, H. Inflammation mechanism and anti-inflammatory therapy of dry eye. Front Med (Lausanne). (2024) 11:1307682. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1307682,
40. Ma, JYW, Sze, YH, Bian, JF, and Lam, TC. Critical role of mass spectrometry proteomics in tear biomarker discovery for multifactorial ocular diseases (review). Int J Mol Med. (2021) 47:83. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2021.4916,
41. Qin, R, Zheng, F, Qin, W, Wang, J, Ma, N, Tian, W, et al. Progranulin promotes proliferation, migration and invasion via the PI3K/akt signalling pathway in a model of endometriosis. Reprod Biomed Online. (2023) 46:425–35. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.11.006,
42. Toprak Tellioglu, H, Dikmetas, O, Kocabeyoglu, S, Tan, Ç, Yaz, I, Cicek, B, et al. Comparison of tear cytokines and neuropeptides, ocular surface parameters, and corneal nerve structure in patients with early-stage diabetes mellitus and control subjects. Int Ophthalmol. (2025) 45:119. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03502-9,
43. Pal-Ghosh, S, Karpinski, BA, Datta-Majumdar, H, Datta, S, Dimri, S, Hally, J, et al. Mechanisms regulating mitochondrial transfer in human corneal epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2024) 65:10. doi: 10.1167/iovs.65.13.10,
44. Gad, H, Petropoulos, IN, Khan, A, Ponirakis, G, MacDonald, R, Alam, U, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Investig. (2022) 13:134–47. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13643,
45. Ponirakis, G, Al-Janahi, I, Elgassim, E, Homssi, M, Petropoulos, IN, Gad, H, et al. Sustained corneal nerve loss predicts the development of diabetic neuropathy in type 2 diabetes. Front Neurosci. (2024) 18:1393105. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1393105,
46. Ferdousi, M, Kalteniece, A, Petropoulos, I, Azmi, S, Dhage, S, Marshall, A, et al. Diabetic neuropathy is characterized by progressive corneal nerve Fiber loss in the central and inferior whorl regions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2020) 61:48. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.3.48,
47. Abicca, I, Giannini, D, Gilardi, M, Roszkowska, AM, Parravano, M, Picconi, F, et al. A novel algorithm for the evaluation of corneal nerve beadings by in vivo confocal microscopy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Front Med (Lausanne). (2022) 9:897259. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.897259,
48. Mvilongo, C, Akono, ME, Nkoudou, D, Nanfack, C, Nomo, A, Dim, R, et al. Clinical profile of corneal sensitivity in diabetic patients: a case-control study. J Fr Ophtalmol. (2024) 47:104212. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2024.104212,
49. Kiyat, P, Kose, T, Gümüstas, B, and Selver, OB. Evaluation of corneal sensitivity and quadrature variability in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. (2022) 29:200–4. doi: 10.4103/meajo.meajo_111_23,
50. Fang, W, Lin, Z-X, Yang, H-Q, Zhao, L, Liu, D-C, and Pan, Z-Q. Changes in corneal nerve morphology and function in patients with dry eyes having type 2 diabetes. World J Clin Cases. (2022) 10:3014–26. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i10.3014,
51. Petropoulos, IN, Bitirgen, G, Ferdousi, M, Kalteniece, A, Azmi, S, D’Onofrio, L, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy to image small nerve fiber degeneration: ophthalmology meets neurology. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). (2021) 2:725363. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2021.725363
52. Puri, S, Kenyon, BM, and Hamrah, P. Immunomodulatory role of neuropeptides in the cornea. Biomedicines. (2022) 10:1985. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10081985
53. Singh, RB, Naderi, A, Cho, W, Ortiz, G, Musayeva, A, Dohlman, TH, et al. Modulating the tachykinin: role of substance P and neurokinin receptor expression in ocular surface disorders. Ocul Surf. (2022) 25:142–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2022.06.007
54. Ma, L, Yang, L, Wang, X, Zhao, L, Bai, X, Qi, X, et al. CGRP released by corneal sensory nerve maintains tear secretion of the lacrimal gland. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. (2024) 65:30. doi: 10.1167/iovs.65.4.30
55. Wan, L, Zhou, QJ, and Xie, LX. Research progress on the pathogenesis of diabetes-related dry eye. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. (2022) 58:1099–105. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20220503-00227,
56. Ekin, MA, Kahraman, HG, Egrilmez, ED, Arici, S, and Oruk, GG. Association of peripheral neuropathy with dry eye disease and meibomian gland dysfunction in patients with type 1 diabetes. Int Ophthalmol. (2025) 45:61. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03420-w,
57. Vereertbrugghen, A, and Galletti, JG. Corneal nerves and their role in dry eye pathophysiology. Exp Eye Res. (2022) 222:109191. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2022.109191,
58. Yu, F-SX, Lee, PSY, Yang, L, Gao, N, Zhang, Y, Ljubimov, AV, et al. The impact of sensory neuropathy and inflammation on epithelial wound healing in diabetic corneas. Prog Retin Eye Res. (2022) 89:101039. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.101039
59. Dartt, DA. Neural regulation of lacrimal gland secretory processes: relevance in dry eye diseases. Prog Retin Eye Res. (2009) 28:155–77. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2009.04.003,
60. Qu, M, Wan, L, Dong, M, Wang, Y, Xie, L, and Zhou, Q. Hyperglycemia-induced severe mitochondrial bioenergetic deficit of lacrimal gland contributes to the early onset of dry eye in diabetic mice. Free Radic Biol Med. (2021) 166:313–23. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.02.036,
61. He, Y, Fu, Q, Sun, M, Qian, Y, Liang, Y, Zhang, J, et al. Phosphoproteome reveals molecular mechanisms of aberrant rhythm in neurotransmitter-mediated islet hormone secretion in diabetic mice. Clin Transl Med. (2022) 12:e890. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.890,
62. Zhang, S, Wang, Q, Qu, M, Chen, Q, Bai, X, Zhang, Z, et al. Hyperglycemia induces tear reduction and dry eye in diabetic mice through the norepinephrine-α1 adrenergic receptor-mitochondrial impairment axis of lacrimal gland. Am J Pathol. (2023) 193:913–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2023.03.015,
63. Qin, G, Chen, J, Li, L, Qi, Y, Chen, Y, Zhang, Q, et al. Effects of diquafosol sodium ophthalmic solution on tear film matrix metallopeptidase-9 and corneal nerve density in patients with type 2 diabetic dry eye. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. (2024) 40:370–8. doi: 10.1089/jop.2023.0098
64. Rajbanshi, G, Li, W, Nong, X, Li, Y, and Nong, D. Lacrimal gland alterations and the effect of artesunate on experimental induced diabetes rat models and related mechanisms. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:12556. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61550-0,
65. Guo, Y, Zhang, H, Zhao, Z, Luo, X, Zhang, M, Bu, J, et al. Hyperglycemia induces Meibomian gland dysfunction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2022) 63:30. doi: 10.1167/iovs.63.1.30,
66. Alfuraih, S, Tran, A, Kim, L, Ansari, R, and Sharma, A. Hyperglycemia causes differential change in macrophage population in the lacrimal gland, conjunctiva and cornea. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1505508. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1505508,
67. Schicht, M, Farger, J, Wedel, S, Sisignano, M, Scholich, K, Geisslinger, G, et al. Ocular surface changes in mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes and diabetic polyneuropathy. Ocul Surf. (2024) 31:43–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2023.12.006,
68. Mohamed-Noriega, K, González-Arocha, CS, Morales-Wong, F, Velasco-Sepúlveda, BH, Rodríguez-Cuevas, JO, Cepeda-Ortegón, GE, et al. Meibomian gland dysfunction and dropout in diabetic patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Bioengineering (Basel). (2024) 11:907. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11090907,
69. Yang, Q, Liu, L, Li, J, Yan, H, Cai, H, Sheng, M, et al. Evaluation of meibomian gland dysfunction in type 2 diabetes with dry eye disease: a non-randomized controlled trial. BMC Ophthalmol. (2023) 23:44. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02795-7,
70. Abusharha, A, El-Hiti, GA, Alsubaie, MH, Munshi, AF, Alnasif, AR, Fagehi, R, et al. Evaluation of tear evaporation rate in patients with diabetes using a hand-held evaporimeter. Healthcare (Basel). (2022) 10:104. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010104,
71. Zeppieri, M, Capobianco, M, Visalli, F, Musa, M, Avitabile, A, Giglio, R, et al. Beyond the surface: revealing the concealed effects of hyperglycemia on ocular surface homeostasis and dry eye disease. Medicina (Kaunas). (2025) 61:1992. doi: 10.3390/medicina61111992,
72. Yu, T, Han, X-G, Gao, Y, Song, A-P, and Dang, G-F. Morphological and cytological changes of meibomian glands in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Ophthalmol. (2019) 12:1415–9. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.09.07,
73. Silva-Viguera, M-C, Pérez-Barea, A, and Bautista-Llamas, M-J. Tear film layers and meibomian gland assessment in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using a noninvasive ocular surface analyzer: a cross-sectional case-control study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2023) 261:1483–92. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05934-w,
74. Huang, M, Yan, X, Gao, Y, Song, W, Cheng, Y, Xie, L, et al. The effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on lid wiper epitheliopathy and ocular surface parameters. Heliyon. (2024) 10:e36912. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36912,
75. Argüeso, P. Human ocular mucins: the endowed guardians of sight. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. (2022) 180:114074. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.114074,
76. Weng, J, Trinh, S, Lee, R, Metwale, R, and Sharma, A. Impact of high glucose on ocular surface Glycocalyx components: implications for diabetes-associated ocular surface damage. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:14289. doi: 10.3390/ijms232214289,
77. Martínez-Carrasco, R, and Sharma, A. Ocular surface glycocalyx in health and disease. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2025) 13:1561324. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1561324,
78. Fang, Z, Liu, K, Pazo, EE, Li, F, Chang, L, Zhang, Z, et al. Clinical ocular surface characteristics and expression of MUC5AC in diabetics: a population-based study. Eye (Lond). (2024) 38:3145–52. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03252-5,
79. Kondrakhova, D, Unger, M, Stadler, H, Zakuťanská, K, Tomašovičová, N, Tomečková, V, et al. Determination diabetes mellitus disease markers in tear fluid by photothermal AFM-IR analysis. Nanomedicine (Lond). (2025) 64:102803. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2025.102803,
80. Polkamp, M, Pham, NHT, Wong, WKM, Hardikar, HP, Kunte, PS, Cameron, MA, et al. Tear-fluid-derived biomarkers of ocular complications in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. (2025) 23:84. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03855-z,
81. Brunmair, J, Bileck, A, Schmidl, D, Hagn, G, Meier-Menches, SM, Hommer, N, et al. Metabolic phenotyping of tear fluid as a prognostic tool for personalised medicine exemplified by T2DM patients. EPMA J. (2022) 13:107–23. doi: 10.1007/s13167-022-00272-7,
82. Alhalwani, AY, Abudawood, K, Qadizadah, ABEA, Jambi, S, and Sannan, NS. Immunoglobulin a levels and its correlation with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as inflammatory biomarkers for dry eye disease in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective study. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1184862. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1184862,
83. Xing, L, Chen, B, Qin, Y, Li, X, Zhou, S, Yuan, K, et al. The role of neuropeptides in cutaneous wound healing: a focus on mechanisms and neuropeptide-derived treatments. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. (2024) 12:1494865. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1494865,
84. Olaniyan, SI, Fasina, O, Bekibele, CO, and Ogundipe, AO. Relationship between dry eye and glycosylated haemoglobin among diabetics in Ibadan, Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J. (2019) 33:14. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.33.14.14074,
85. Han, W-T, Zhao, J, Feng, W-L, and Ma, W-T. Type 2 diabetes complicated by dry eye syndrome: analysis of dry eye symptoms, corneal neuropathy, and influencing factors. World J Diabetes. (2025) 16:109080. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i10.109080,
86. Hao, Y, Wu, B, Feng, J, He, J, Zang, Y, Tian, L, et al. Relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus and changes of the lid margin, meibomian gland and tear film in dry eye patients: a cross-sectional study. Int Ophthalmol. (2025) 45:261. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03636-w,
87. Liu, Y, Sun, D, Kong, Q, Li, D, Wang, R, Yin, J, et al. Peripheral neuropathy symptoms and ocular surface lesions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and dry eye: a clinical correlational study. Ophthalmol Ther. (2025) 14:1503–19. doi: 10.1007/s40123-025-01150-x,
88. Alhussayen, L, Alshenqeti, AM, Alfaqi, R, and Aalam, WA. Magnitude and determinants of dry eye syndrome among persons with diabetes mellitus. Cureus. (2025) 17:e91685. doi: 10.7759/cureus.91685,
89. Chen, K-Y, Chan, H-C, and Chan, C-M. Is there a link between dry eye disease and diabetes mellitus? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Complicat. (2025) 39:109149. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2025.109149,
90. Lee, Y, Kim, M, and Galor, A. Beyond dry eye: how co-morbidities influence disease phenotype in dry eye disease. Clin Exp Optom. (2022) 105:177–85. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1962210,
91. Tummanapalli, SS, Wang, LL, Dhanapalaratnam, R, Poynten, A, Papas, EB, Krishnan, AV, et al. Moderate-severe peripheral neuropathy in diabetes associated with an increased risk of dry eye disease. Optom Vis Sci. (2024) 101:563–70. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002178,
92. Machalińska, A, Kuligowska, A, Ziontkowska-Wrzałek, A, Stroynowska, B, Pius-Sadowska, E, Safranow, K, et al. The severity of diabetic retinopathy corresponds with corneal nerve alterations and ocular discomfort of the patient. Int J Mol Sci. (2024) 25:6072. doi: 10.3390/ijms25116072,
93. Roszkowska, AM, Wylęgała, A, Gargiulo, L, Inferrera, L, Russo, M, Mencucci, R, et al. Corneal sub-basal nerve plexus in non-diabetic small Fiber polyneuropathies and the diagnostic role of in vivo corneal confocal microscopy. J Clin Med. (2023) 12:664. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020664,
94. Badian, RA, and Lagali, N. The inferocentral whorl region and its directional patterns in the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus: a review. Exp Eye Res. (2024) 244:109926. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2024.109926,
95. Tang, W, Chen, X, Yuan, J, Meng, Q, Shi, F, Xiang, D, et al. Multi-scale and local feature guidance network for corneal nerve fiber segmentation. Phys Med Biol. (2023) 68. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/acccd0,
96. Khanna, RK, Catanese, S, Emond, P, Corcia, P, Blasco, H, and Pisella, P-J. Metabolomics and lipidomics approaches in human tears: a systematic review. Surv Ophthalmol. (2022) 67:1229–43. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2022.01.010,
97. Gijs, M, van de Sande, N, Bonnet, C, Schmeetz, J, Fernandes, R, Travé-Huarte, S, et al. A comprehensive scoping review of methodological approaches and clinical applications of tear fluid biomarkers. Prog Retin Eye Res. (2025) 106:101338. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2025.101338,
98. Cao, N, Feng, L, Xu, W, He, F, Xiao, C, Liu, Y, et al. Tear glucose is associated with the presence and severity of diabetic retinopathy. Int J Retina Vitreous. (2025) 11:13. doi: 10.1186/s40942-025-00636-x,
99. Byambajav, M, Collier, A, Shu, X, and Hagan, S. Tear fluid biomarkers and quality of life in people with type 2 diabetes and dry eye disease. Meta. (2023) 13:733. doi: 10.3390/metabo13060733,
100. An, Q, and Zou, H. Ocular surface microbiota dysbiosis contributes to the high prevalence of dry eye disease in diabetic patients. Crit Rev Microbiol. (2023) 49:805–14. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2022.2142090,
101. Tummanapalli, SS, Issar, T, Kwai, N, Pisarcikova, J, Poynten, AM, Krishnan, AV, et al. A comparative study on the diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and tear Neuromediator levels in diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Curr Eye Res. (2020) 45:921–30. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1705984,
102. Diaz, D, Sassani, JP, Zagon, IS, and McLaughlin, PJ. Topical naltrexone increases aquaporin 5 production in the lacrimal gland and restores tear production in diabetic rats. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). (2024) 249:10175. doi: 10.3389/ebm.2024.10175,
103. Kalra, S, Gokhale, NS, Bantwal, G, Matada, R, Shaikh, S, Pawar, V, et al. Dry eye in diabetes: the Indian diabetic and endocrine eye diseases (INDEED) review. touchREV Endocrinol. (2024) 20:30–41. doi: 10.17925/EE.2024.20.2.6,
104. Yuan, J, and Deng, YQ. Emphasizing the diagnosis and treatment of diabetes related dry eye. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. (2017) 53:645–7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2017.09.002,
105. Chen, J, and Pan, Z. Repair of dry eye-related corneal epithelial damage. Chin J Exp Ophthalmol. (2021) 39:264–8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20201102-00725
106. Li, J-L, Zhao, J, Guo, Z-F, Xiao, C, and Liu, X. Efficacy of recombinant human epidermal growth factor plus sodium hyaluronate eye drops in diabetic dry eye post-cataract surgery. World J Diabetes. (2024) 15:1234–41. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i6.1234,
107. Fan, Y-C, Peng, S-Y, Chang, C-K, Lee, C-Y, Huang, J-Y, Hsieh, M-J, et al. The utilization of glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists and risk of following external eye diseases in type 2 diabetes mellitus individuals: a population-based study. Healthcare (Basel). (2023) 11:2749. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202749,
108. Su, Y-C, Hung, J-H, Chang, K-C, Sun, C-C, Huang, Y-H, Lee, C-N, et al. Comparison of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors vs glucagonlike Peptide-1 receptor agonists and incidence of dry eye disease in patients with type 2 diabetes in Taiwan. JAMA Netw Open. (2022) 5:e2232584. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32584,
109. Asiedu, K, Tummanapalli, SS, Alotaibi, S, Wang, LL, Dhanapalaratnam, R, Kwai, N, et al. Impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on corneal nerve morphology and dendritic cell density in type 2 diabetes. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. (2024) 32:234–41. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2023.2263789,
110. Ottonelli, G, Gaeta, A, Montericcio, N, Tredici, C, Ortfeldt, V, Birtolo, MF, et al. GLP-1R agonists improve ocular surface parameters in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ophthalmol. (2025) 19:3829–36. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S547776,
111. Tsoi, AT, Sng, J, Tummanapalli, SS, Issar, T, Poynten, AM, Milner, K-L, et al. Metformin therapy modifies corneal neuroimmune abnormalities in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. (2025) 68:1329–34. doi: 10.1007/s00125-025-06399-2,
112. Ponirakis, G, Abdul-Ghani, MA, Jayyousi, A, Almuhannadi, H, Petropoulos, IN, Khan, A, et al. Effect of treatment with exenatide and pioglitazone or basal-bolus insulin on diabetic neuropathy: a substudy of the Qatar study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. (2020) 8:e001420. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001420,
113. Fogagnolo, P, Melardi, E, Tranchina, L, and Rossetti, L. Topical citicoline and vitamin B12 versus placebo in the treatment of diabetes-related corneal nerve damage: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. BMC Ophthalmol. (2020) 20:315. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01584-w,
114. Coco, G, Piccotti, G, Romano, V, Ferro Desideri, L, Vagge, A, Traverso, CE, et al. Cenegermin for the treatment of dry eye disease. Drugs Today. (2023) 59:113–23. doi: 10.1358/dot.2023.59.3.3521858,
115. Yao, Y, Wang, L, Ding, J, Pan, X, Yang, L, Guo, C, et al. Nerve growth factor loaded hypotonic eye drops for corneal nerve repair. J Control Release. (2025) 380:71–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.01.080,
116. Li, Z, Wang, X, and Li, X. Effectiveness of intranasal tear Neurostimulation for treatment of dry eye disease: a Meta-analysis. Ophthalmol Ther. (2023) 12:389–400. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00616-6,
117. Hu, J, Ju, M, Shi, Y, Liu, X, and Zhu, Y. Efficacy and safety of trigeminal parasympathetic pathway stimulation for dry eye: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Ophthalmol. (2024) 72:S381–92. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2147_23,
118. Park, JK, Cremers, S, and Kossler, AL. Neurostimulation for tear production. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. (2019) 30:386–94. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000590,
119. Zhang, Q, Zhang, H, Qin, G, Wu, Y, Song, Y, Yang, L, et al. Impact of Diquafosol ophthalmic solution on tear film and dry eye symptom in type 2 diabetic dry eye: a pilot study. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. (2022) 38:133–40. doi: 10.1089/jop.2021.0083,
120. Chen, J, Zhang, Y, Yu, S, Zhang, Q, He, W, Qin, G, et al. The impact of 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution on tear film and corneal nerve density in patients with diabetes and dry eye disease: a randomized controlled study. Ophthalmol Ther. (2025) 14:2527–41. doi: 10.1007/s40123-025-01223-x,
121. Zhang, X, Zhao, L, Deng, S, Sun, X, and Wang, N. Dry eye syndrome in patients with diabetes mellitus: prevalence, etiology, and clinical characteristics. J Ophthalmol. (2016) 2016:8201053. doi: 10.1155/2016/8201053,
122. Atikah, A, Suzana, M, Wan Haslina, W a H, Norshamsiah, MD, Mushawiahti, M, Birinder, KSS, et al. Randomised controlled trial on effects of topical insulin compared to artificial tears and normal saline on tear inflammatory mediator levels and clinical parameters in diabetics with dry eye disease. Cont Lens and Anterior Eye. (2025) 48:102346. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2024.102346,
123. Scarinci, F, De Simone, G, Ciancimino, C, Caggiano, C, Pocobelli, G, and Di Masi, A. Enhancing corneal sensitivity in diabetic patients through an innovative ophthalmic solution: in vivo and vitro results. J Clin Med. (2025) 14:245. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010245,
124. Britten-Jones, AC, Kamel, JT, Roberts, LJ, Braat, S, Craig, JP, MacIsaac, RJ, et al. Investigating the neuroprotective effect of oral omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in type 1 diabetes (nPROOFS1): a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes. (2021) 70:1794–806. doi: 10.2337/db21-0136,
125. Roszkowska, AM, Spinella, R, Oliverio, GW, Postorino, EI, Signorino, GA, Rusciano, D, et al. Effects of the topical use of the natural antioxidant alpha-lipoic acid on the ocular surface of diabetic patients with dry eye symptoms. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). (2022) 27:202. doi: 10.31083/j.fbl2707202
126. Ajith, TA. Alpha-lipoic acid: a possible pharmacological agent for treating dry eye disease and retinopathy in diabetes. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. (2020) 47:1883–90. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.13373,
127. Han, R, and Hu, J. Acupuncture: an overview on its functions, meridian pathways and molecular mechanisms. Am J Chin Med. (2024) 52:1215–44. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X24500496
128. Wang, M, Liu, W, Ge, J, and Liu, S. The immunomodulatory mechanisms for acupuncture practice. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1147718. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1147718,
129. Yang, Y, Rao, C, Yin, T, Wang, S, Shi, H, Yan, X, et al. Application and underlying mechanism of acupuncture for the nerve repair after peripheral nerve injury: remodeling of nerve system. Front Cell Neurosci. (2023) 17:1253438. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1253438,
130. Shang, W-Y, Ren, Y-F, Huang, J, Li, B, Huang, X-M, and Zhang, Z-L. Progress of researches on acupuncture treatment of spinal cord injury by promoting axonal regeneration. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. (2025) 50:96–103. doi: 10.13702/j.1000-0607.20230840
131. Wang, Y, Peng, J, Xiao, L, Deng, Y, Lu, J, Zhou, Y-S, et al. Effectiveness of acupuncture combined with artificial tears in managing dry eye syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). (2024) 103:e36374. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036374,
132. Wang, J, Chen, S, Zhao, X, Guo, Q, Yang, R, Zhang, C, et al. Effect of PPARγ on oxidative stress in diabetes-related dry eye. Exp Eye Res. (2023) 231:109498. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2023.109498
133. Dai, S, Long, J, Han, W, Zhang, L, and Chen, B. Alleviative effect of probiotics and prebiotics on dry eye in type 2 diabetic mice through the gut-eye axis. Ocul Surf. (2025) 36:244–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2025.02.004,
Keywords: diabetic dry eye, corneal neuropathy, tear film instability, confocal microscopy, tear fluid biomarkers, therapeutic interventions
Citation: Huang T, Wang D, Jiang D, Lu X, Lin L, Zhang Y, Li X, Hou Y, Li H and Liu X (2026) Diabetic dry eye: advances in pathogenesis, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic approaches. Front. Med. 13:1756568. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1756568
Edited by:
Dario Rusciano, Consultant, Catania, ItalyReviewed by:
Francesco Cappellani, University of Catania, ItalyLi Bing, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, China
Copyright © 2026 Huang, Wang, Jiang, Lu, Lin, Zhang, Li, Hou, Li and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hong Li, c2hhbmhvbmdsaUAxMjYuY29t; Xinquan Liu, ZHJsaXV4aW5xdWFuQGhvdG1haWwuY29t
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship