Evaluating the real-world safety of cholestyramine for the treatment of hyperlipidemia: disproportionality analysis of FAERS data

Background: Hypercholesterolemia is a significant risk factor for severe cardiovascular diseases. Cholestyramine lowers serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and is clinically indicated for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia, relieve itching symptoms caused by bile acid accumulation in cholestatic diseases (such as primary biliary cirrhosis), as well as to manage bile acid diarrhea resulting from bile acid metabolic disorders. With its widespread clinical application, it is essential to understand its safety in real-world settings.

Methods: This study evaluated the clinical safety of cholestyramine by analyzing all adverse event reports since 2004 in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), where cholestyramine was identified as the primary suspected drug. Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) composite criteria method, Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), and Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) were used to analyze adverse events associated with cholestyramine.

Results: The study results confirmed known adverse reactions of cholestyramine, such as constipation, abdominal discomfort, bloating, steatorrhea, bleeding tendencies, night blindness, hyperchloremic acidosis, osteoporosis, rashes, and local irritation caused by deficiencies in vitamins K, A, and D, which are also listed in the drug’s package insert. Additionally, adverse reactions not documented in the package insert were identified, including off-label use, administration for unapproved indications, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), fecal abnormalities (color changes, softening, hardening), blood glucose fluctuations, tooth fracture, and exacerbation of concurrent medical conditions. This study also underscores the importance of early detection of adverse reactions associated with cholestyramine.

Conclusion: By providing insights into both known and potential adverse reactionsin real-world settings, the findings offer enhanced safety information to assist clinicians in prescribing cholestyramine for conditions such as hypercholesterolemia, cholestasis-associated pruritus, and bile acid diarrhea.

1 Introduction

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is one of the most common and severe cardiovascular disease. Its high incidence and case-fatality rate threaten patients’ lives, markedly degrade quality of life, and impose a heavy burden on the health-care systems (1). Hypercholesterolemia, particularly elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), is an important risk factor for CHD and myocardial infarction (MI) (2). Excess LDL-C deposits in the coronary intima, forming atherosclerotic plaques that narrow or occlude vessels, precipitating myocardial ischaemia, angina, and potentially MI. Consequently, is essential to prevent cardiovascular events, Excess LDL-C deposits in the coronary intima, forming atherosclerotic plaques that narrow or occlude vessels, precipitating myocardial ischemia, angina, and potentially MI (3). Consequently, aggressive lipid management, and in particular maintaining LDL-C within target ranges, is crucial for preventing cardiovascular events, retard atherogenesis, and reduce CHD morbidity and mortality.

Cholestyramine, an anion-exchange resin that sequesters bile acid in the gut, interrupts their enterohepatic circulation.

The drug is indicated for primary hypercholesterolaemia—particularly in statin-intolerant patients—and for cholestatic pruritus (e.g., in primary biliary cholangitis) and bile-acid diarrhoea caused by malabsorption. Although its efficacy is well established, safety concerns persist. By binding intestinal bile acids, cholestyramine can impair fat digestion and cause bloating, constipation, or diarrhoea. It also reduces absorption of fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, and K), potentially leading to osteoporosis (vitamin D deficiency) or bleeding disorders (vitamin K deficiency).

The resulting bile-acid depletion drives hepatic conversion of cholesterol to new bile acids, thereby reducing serum LDL-C levels (4). It is clinically used primarily for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia, especially in patients who are intolerant to statins (4, 5). It is also used to relieve itching symptoms caused by bile acid accumulation in cholestatic diseases (such as primary biliary cirrhosis) and to manage bile acid diarrhea resulting from bile acid malabsorption (6–8). Although the efficacy of cholestyramine is well-established, safety concerns persist. By binding intestinal bile acids, cholestyramine can impair fat digestion and cause constipation, bloating or diarrhea (9). It also reduces the absorption of fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, and K), increasing the risk of deficiencies in these vitamins (10). This can, in turn, potentially leading to osteoporosis (vitamin D deficiency) or coagulation disorders (vitamin K deficiency).

The FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) is a global pharmacovigilance database that collects spontaneously reported adverse events (AEs) from healthcare professionals, patients, and pharmaceutical companies to detect post-marketing safety signals. Compared with clinical trials, FAERS offers larger sample sizes, longer observation, and greater population diversity, making it particularly effective in detecting rare or delayed adverse events. Data-mining of FAERS, for example, researchers have successfully identified mental status changes, conversion disorder, and eye movement disorder caused by Regadenoson, highlighting its value in pharmacovigilance (11). As clinical experience accumulates, FAERS mining suggests that the full safety profile of cholestyramine may have gradually been identified.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Data source

This study relied on the open data resources of the US FAERS to conduct a retrospective analysis of adverse events related to cholestyramine. The data covered the period from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2024, and the inclusion criteria were all ASCII format original report data that labeled cholestyramine as the “primary suspect drug.” This database integrates drug safety information submitted by global medical staff, patients, and pharmaceutical companies through a spontaneous reporting mechanism.

This study utilized publicly available data from the U.S. Food and drug administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS). The data were accessed and used in accordance with the terms and conditions specified by the FAERS database, ensuring compliance with all relevant regulations and guidelines. As the data are de-identified and publicly accessible, no individual patient information was disclosed, and no additional ethical approval was required for this study. The study design and analysis were conducted in a manner that respects patient privacy and confidentiality. The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to the use of FAERS data in this research.

2.2 Data processing procedure

The data cleaning and standardization process included three stages as follows. The first stage implemented the FDA-recommended hierarchical deduplication strategy, which involved sorting by case unique identifier (CASEID) and prioritizing the report with the most recent receipt date (FDA_DT), selecting the record with a larger PRIMARYID value when CASEID and FDA_DT were completely the same, and synchronizing the verification of the deletion list for quarterly data update packages after 2019 to exclude invalid entries. The second stage completed medical coding transformation, based on MedDRA terminology library version 27.1, to uniformly map the original adverse event descriptions to standardized preferred terms (PT) and system organ classification (SOC). The final stage constructed a structured dataset, and the specific processing procedure is shown in Figure 1, the technical roadmap.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Flowchart demonstrating the AE analysis process for cholestyramine using the FAERS database. AE, adverse event; DEMO, demographic data; DRUG, drug; FAERS, FDA adverse event reporting system; REAC, reaction data; ROR, reporting odds ratio; PRR, proportional reporting ratio; BCPNN, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network; MGPS, multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker; SOC, system organ class; PS, primary suspect; PT, preferred term.

2.3 Statistical analysis strategy

An incremental analysis framework was adopted: (1) descriptive statistics: to parse the composition characteristics of the dataset from dimensions such as demographic characteristics, report sources, and geographical distribution; (2)signal detection: integrating four internationally accepted disproportionality analysis methods—reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR, with thresholds set according to the MHRA standard), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinkage (MGPS); (3)time series modeling: constructing a Weibull distribution model to explore the temporal dynamic characteristics of adverse events. The analysis process was implemented on the SAS 9.4 platform, and the algorithm parameters and calculation formulas are detailed in Supplementary Tables S1, S2.

An incremental analysis framework was adopted, including descriptive statistics to parse the composition characteristics of the dataset from dimensions such as demographic characteristics, report sources, and geographical distribution; signal detection integrating four internationally accepted disproportionality analysis methods—reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR) with thresholds set according to the MHRA standard, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinkage (MGPS), and time series modeling constructing a Weibull distribution model to explore the temporal dynamic characteristics of adverse events. The analysis process was implemented on the SAS 9.4 platform, and the algorithm parameters and calculation formulas are detailed in Supplementary Tables S1, S2.

3 Results

3.1 Clinical characteristics

A total of 1,414 adverse event reports with cholestyramine as the primary suspect drug were included in this study (Figure 1). Among them, 62.09% were female patients, 24.11% were male patients, and 13.79% had unknown gender. The age group with the highest proportion was >65 years old (24.05%), followed by the 18–65 years group (18.25%), with the <18 years group being the least (0.5%), and 57.21% had unknown age. Most reports were submitted by consumers (69.87%), doctors (12.94%), pharmacists (8.7%), and other health professionals (5.52%). Adverse events were mainly concentrated in the years 2015–2024 after the drug was marketed, with very few adverse events occurring in 2004–2015, which is considered to be related to the initial lack of widespread application of the drug. 89.89% of the reports came from the United States. Adverse reactions often led to patient hospitalization (22.53%), disability (4.74%), or life-threatening conditions (3.95%). See Table 1 for details.

Table 1

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of AE reports related to cholestyramine from the FAERS database (Q1 2004-Q4 2024).

3.2 Adverse event distribution at the system organ class (SOC) level

Adverse events related to cholestyramine involved all 27 SOC classifications. As shown in Table 2, significant categories included, but were not limited to gastrointestinal disorders, product issues, injury, poisoning and procedural complications, general disorders and administration site conditions, respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders, investigations, nervous system disorders, musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, metabolism and nutrition disorders, psychiatric disorders, immune system disorders, infections and infestations, and renal and urinary disorders. Table 2 shows the signal strength at the SOC level.

Table 2

Table 2. Signal strength of cholestyramine-related AEs at the system organ class (SOC) level in the FAERS database.

3.3 Adverse event distribution at the preferred term (PT) level

Adverse events related to cholestyramine were sorted by frequency of occurrence and assessed for signals. Among the adverse events in the FAERS, the side effects mentioned in the package insert are as follows. The most common adverse reaction is constipation, especially in patients with high doses of cholestyramine and those over 60 years old. Less common adverse reactions include abdominal discomfort, bloating, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, belching, anorexia, steatorrhea, bleeding tendency, night blindness, hyperchloremic acidosis, osteoporosis, rash, and local irritation caused by vitamin K, A, and D deficiency. In children, there have been rare reports of intestinal obstruction (including two deaths), and some patients may experience biliary calcification or biliary colic, but these may be related to liver disease rather than directly caused by the drug. Other reported events (not necessarily related to the drug) include gastrointestinal symptoms (such as rectal bleeding, dysphagia, pancreatitis, etc.), laboratory test abnormalities (liver function abnormalities, prolonged prothrombin time, etc.), allergic reactions (urticaria, asthma, dyspnea, etc.), musculoskeletal pain, nervous system symptoms (headache, anxiety, vertigo, dizziness, fatigue, tinnitus, syncope, somnolence, femoral neuralgia, paresthesia, etc.), and eye and kidney problems (uveitis, hematuria, etc.).

Adverse reactions not mentioned in the package insert found by FAERS analysis include as following. Off-label use, unapproved indications, intentional product misuse, and use of prescription drugs without a prescription. Product-related issues, including issues with product solubility, taste, physical consistency, formulation, packaging, supply, container, and product quality issues, physical contamination of the product, product sedimentation, etc. Newly discovered adverse reactions include discomfort or abnormalities in the respiratory tract, mouth, and throat (foreign body sensation in the mouth, foreign body sensation in the throat, foreign body sensation in the respiratory tract, dysphonia, cough, choking, choking sensation, oropharyngeal pain, tooth discoloration, gastroesophageal reflux disease, irritable bowel syndrome, etc.), fecal abnormalities (color change, softening, hardening), and abnormal urine odor. Others are as follows: blood glucose fluctuations, tooth fracture, exacerbation of concomitant diseases, etc. Table 3 shows the details of the top 50 adverse events at the PT level. All adverse events that meet the positive signal criteria are listed in the Supplementary Table.

Table 3

Table 3. Top 50 most frequent AEs for cholestyramine at the preferred term (PT) level.

3.4 Time of adverse event occurrence

After excluding reports with false or missing adverse event occurrence times, 326 cholestyramine-related adverse events provided occurrence time data. Most adverse events occurred immediately after administration (n = 234, 71.78%) and within 3 days after administration (1 day after administration n = 14, 4.29%; 2 days after administration n = 6, 1.84%; 3 days after administration n = 7, 2.15%), with the highest proportion of adverse reactions occurring within 1 month after administration (n = 291, 89.26%). Rare cases occurred 2 months (n = 7, 2.15%), 3 months (n = 3, 0.92%), 4 months (n = 1, 0.31%), 5 months (n = 1, 0.31%), 6 months (n = 1, 0.31%), 7 to 12 months (n = 10, 3.07%), and more than 1 year (n = 12, 3.68%) after administration. The median occurrence time was 3 days (interquartile range [IQR] 1.00–7.00 days). The time distribution is shown in Figure 2, and the cumulative incidence curve is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Time to event report distribution of AE reports. AE, adverse event.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Cumulative incidence of AEs. AE, adverse event.

4 Discussion

Hypercholesterolemia is a metabolic disorder characterized by elevated blood cholesterol, particularly LDL-C (12). Aetiologically, it is subdivided into primary forms (familial monogenic or polygenic hypercholesterolemia), and secondary forms attributable to diseases (such as hypothyroidism, diabetes, and liver disorders) or drugs (such as glucocorticoids and β-blockers) (13). Irrespective of cause, hypercholesterolemia is an independent driver of atherosclerosis, stroke, and CHD, and therefore constitutes a serious human-health threat (14). The therapeutic cornerstoen is to reduce LDL-C levels to attenuate atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases. Cholestyramine is a bile acid-binding resin that lowers plasma LDL-C levels by binding bile acids in the intestine and promoting the metabolism of cholesterol to bile acids in cells, and it can be used for patients intolerant to statins (15). Despite its well-documented efficacy safety concerns regarding cholestyramine persist. Through data mining of the FAERS database, this study uncovers potential serious adverse events associated with cholestyramine use, highlighting findings of substantial clinical significance.

This investigation conducted a comprehensive assessment of adverse events related to cholestyramine since its market release in 2004. By analyzing the FAERS database, the study confirmed the common adverse events listed in the drug’s package insert, including constipation, abdominal discomfort, bloating, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, belching, anorexia, steatorrhea, and bleeding tendencies, night blindness, hyperchloremic acidosis, osteoporosis, rashes, and local irritation caused by deficiencies in vitamins K, A, and D. Additionally, potential adverse events not listed in the package insert were identified, such as off-label use, unapproved indications, discomfort or abnormalities in the respiratory tract, mouth, and throat, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), fecal abnormalities (color changes, softening, hardening), blood glucose fluctuations, tooth fracture, and exacerbation of concomitant diseases. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening drug monitoring, especially during the initial administration of cholestyramine, to effectively manage potential side effects.

It is noteworthy that the formulation of cholestyramine—a powder requires reconstitution before administration—may increase the risk of medication errors. Data from the FAERS indicate that the incidence of esophageal obstruction or mucosal injury is significantly higher in patients who swallow the drug directly without dissolving it compared to other formulations. Off-label use, identified as a potential risk factor for adverse reactions associated with cholestyramine, refer to clinical prescribing practices that extend beyond the approved indications, target populations, dosages, or target populations approved by drug regulatory authorities in the drug’s package insert (16). Currently, off-label use is prevalent in clinical practice for several reasons. Firstly, the absence of targeted therapies for certain diseases, such as rare diseases, prompts doctors to explore new therapeutic applications for existing drugs. Secondly, although emerging evidence may support the efficacy of a drug for a new indication, pharmaceutical companies may not have pursued regulatory approval for that use. Thirdly, the need for individualized treatment arises when patients are intolerant to conventional treatments and require dosage adjustments. Lastly, cost considerations lead patients to choose cheaper old drugs over expensive new ones due to economic issues (17). Thus, it appears that appropriate explanations are: when using cholestyramine, doctors or pharmacists may not clearly instruct patients, and patients may not use cholestyramine according to the required indications, dosages, etc., in the package insert, leading to off-label use. To mitigate these risks, clinicians should adhere to standardized prescribing protocols and reinforce patient education regarding proper medication handling and potential adverse effects.

GERD is another potential adverse reaction. GERD refers to a condition where the contents of the duodenum or stomach reflux into the esophagus, mouth, or airway, causing reflux esophagitis or damage to extra-esophageal tissues (18). Common manifestations of GERD include persistent cough, heartburn, acid regurgitation, and chest pain. The pathogenesis of GERD is highly complex and may involve the direct corrosive effects of stomach acid and pepsin on the esophageal mucosa, vagal nerve dysfunction, inflammatory responses, increased esophageal sensitivity, and Helicobacter pylori infection (19). Known adverse reactions of cholestyramine include nausea and vomiting (20). Thus, a possible explanation is that cholestyramine use, which causes nausea and vomiting, leads to the reflux of stomach contents, including stomach acid and pepsin, into the esophagus, directly corroding the esophageal mucosa and causing esophageal inflammation, erosion, and even ulcers. The relationship between cholestyramine and GERD needs further research to be proven, but this adverse reaction provides a basis for doctors to prevent GERD when using cholestyramine in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

IBS has been identified as a potential adverse reaction associated with cholestyramine use. IBS is a functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by symptoms such as abdominal pain, bloating, and changes in bowel habits (21). Its current incidence ranges from 2 to 12%, though actual rates are likely higher, with a slightly predominance in females. IBS is typically classified into four subtypes: constipation-predominant, diarrhea-predominant, mixed, and unsubtyped IBS (22). The condition is often recurrent and chronic, significantly affecting patients’ quality of life. Studies indicate that IBS arises from a multifactorial interplay of elements, including psychological disorders, gastrointestinal motility abnormalities, gastrointestinal infections and inflammation, visceral hypersensitivity, and gastrointestinal hormones (23). These underlying mechanisms align with several documented adverse reactions of cholestyramine, such as constipation, abdominal discomfort, and diarrhea. Thus, a plausible explanatory mechanism is that cholestyramine induced constipation, abdominal discomfort, or diarrhea may disrupt gastrointestinal motility, visceral hypersensitivity, exacerbate intestinal infections or inflammation, and alter gastrointestinal hormone secretion, collectively contributing to the occurrence of IBS. During treatment with cholestyramine, close monitoring of intra-abdominal pressure, bowel movements, and other gastrointestinal parameters is recommended. If symptoms such as increased intra-abdominal pressure, abdominal pain, diarrhea, or constipation occur, IBS should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Physicians should advise patients to remain vigilant regarding these potential adverse reactions when prescribing cholestyramine.

Our study also suggests that fecal abnormalities (color changes, softening, hardening) are potential risks associated with cholestyramine. Fecal abnormalities indicate issues with the digestive system or other problems and are commonly manifested as: abnormal color, such as tarry stools indicating upper gastrointestinal bleeding or iron use, bright red stools indicating lower gastrointestinal bleeding such as anal fissures or colorectal cancer, and grayish-white stools possibly caused by biliary obstruction; changes in consistency, such as watery stools indicating infection, food poisoning, or allergies, and hard stools indicating constipation or intestinal obstruction, steatorrhea suggesting pancreatitis (24, 25). Fecal abnormalities are often accompanied by symptoms such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, fever, and weight loss. This corresponds with the known adverse reactions of cholestyramine, such as diarrhea and steatorrhea (26). A plausible explanation is that cholestyramine use, which binds bile acids in the intestines, leads to fatty acid metabolic disturbances and poor fat absorption, causing watery stools and steatorrhea. The relationship between cholestyramine and fecal abnormalities needs further research to be confirmed, but this adverse reaction provides a basis for doctors to monitor fecal tests in patients treated with cholestyramine.

Blood glucose fluctuations are potential adverse reactions identified in our study. Blood glucose fluctuations, also known as glycemic variability, refer to the unstable state of blood glucose levels fluctuating between high and low values at different time intervals (27). Physiological blood glucose fluctuations occur under the regulation of the neuroendocrine system to adapt to environmental changes, with a general fluctuation range of 2–3 mmol/L within 24 h (28). Patients, due to infections, stress, and other factors, may experience pancreatic cell damage, increased insulin resistance, and increased secretion of glucagon and other hormones, resulting in more significant blood glucose levels and fluctuation amplitudes compared to normal individuals (29). The cause of blood glucose fluctuations induced by cholestyramine may be that cholestyramine binds to bile acids in the intestines, indirectly affecting fat metabolism and intestinal hormones, impacting insulin sensitivity. Cholestyramine may affect the absorption of other hypoglycemic drugs such as metformin, influencing blood glucose fluctuations. Further research is needed to explore the relationship between cholestyramine and blood glucose fluctuations. In summary, blood glucose fluctuations are potential adverse reactions identified in our study. When using cholestyramine, closely monitor blood glucose changes and provide timely symptomatic treatment.

Tooth fracture has been identified as a potential adverse reaction associated with cholestyramine. Tooth fracture refers to the transverse or longitudinal splitting of teeth caused by trauma, biting hard objects, or weakened tooth structure (30). The organic content in teeth decreases with age, while the inorganic content gradually increases, causing teeth to become more brittle; after biting hard objects, enamel damage can lead to tooth fractures (31). This corresponds with the known adverse reactions of cholestyramine, such as vitamin D deficiency and osteoporosis. A plausible explanation is that cholestyramine use, which causes vitamin D deficiency and osteoporosis, leads to thinner and more fragile bone tissue, making teeth more susceptible to damage or fractures; severe osteoporosis can cause thinning of the alveolar bone, leading to loose teeth, receding gums, and tooth loss. This adverse reaction provides a basis for doctors to advise patients to be cautious about such adverse reactions when treating them with cholestyramine for hypercholesterolemia.

Exacerbation of concomitant diseases is a potential adverse reaction identified in our study. Exacerbation of concomitant diseases refers to the increased risk of worsening conditions and symptom intensification when multiple diseases coexist in a patient, commonly seen in elderly patients, those with chronic illnesses, and individuals with weakened immune systems. The causes of exacerbation of concomitant diseases may include: interactions between different diseases leading to complex conditions, decreased immunity making patients more susceptible to infections, and interactions between different medications affecting drug efficacy (32). The cause of exacerbation of concomitant diseases induced by cholestyramine may be: cholestyramine binding to bile acids in the intestines indirectly affects fat metabolism and the secretion of intestinal hormones, reducing immunity; cholestyramine use, which causes deficiencies in vitamins K, A, and D, leading to bleeding tendencies, may exacerbate damage to other organs. In summary, exacerbation of concomitant diseases is a potential adverse reaction identified in our study. When treating patients with cholestyramine, doctors should advise patients to be cautious about such adverse reactions.

This study conducted a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS data and predicted the cumulative incidence and timing of adverse reactions associated with cholestyramine as the primary suspect drug. This indicates the need for early detection and treatment of related adverse reactions following cholestyramine treatment for hypercholesterolemia and other diseases. This provides strong evidence for the prevention and treatment of adverse reactions, which is beneficial for reducing adverse reactions and improving disease prognosis.

The study has certain limitations. Firstly, the FAERS database is a reporting system provided by patients, pharmacists, and doctors, and there may be inaccuracies and missing data. We have implemented a rigorous data processing procedure, including correcting obvious data entry errors and deleting duplicate reports, to increase the sample size and offset the impact of individual inaccurate data, making our conclusions more accurate. Secondly, our data are all from the United States, so the conclusions are more biased towards North America and may have deviations for regions in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Lastly, while the FAERS database can provide potential risks of adverse reactions, it offers limited assistance with patient epidemiological data.

5 Conclusion

This study utilized FAERS data to conduct a disproportionality analysis of adverse events associated with cholestyramine, focusing on all reports from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2024. The analysis results confirmed known adverse reactions of cholestyramine, such as constipation, abdominal discomfort, bloating, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, belching, anorexia, steatorrhea, and bleeding tendencies, night blindness, hyperchloremic acidosis, osteoporosis, rashes, and local irritation caused by deficiencies in vitamins K, A, and D. It also identified potential adverse reactions such as off-label use, unapproved indications, discomfort or abnormalities in the respiratory tract, mouth, and throat, GERD, IBS, fecal abnormalities (color changes, softening, hardening), blood glucose fluctuations, tooth fracture, and exacerbation of concomitant diseases. These findings underscore the necessity of early monitoring of adverse reactions in patients to ensure the safe application of cholestyramine in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and other diseases.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

QL: Validation, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. MF: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Software. AG: Writing – review & editing, Methodology. LQ: Data curation, Writing – original draft, Project administration.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was supported by the Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Project of Shandong Province (No. Q-2023129) and science and technology development plan program of Weifang (NO.2024YX048).

Acknowledgments

We want to acknowledge the participants and investigators of the study.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2026.1765949/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Groenendyk, JW, Greenland, P, and Khan, SS. Incremental value of polygenic risk scores in primary prevention of coronary heart disease: a review. JAMA Intern Med. (2022) 182:1082–8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.3171,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Shaya, GE, Leucker, TM, Jones, SR, Martin, SS, and Toth, PP. Coronary heart disease risk: low-density lipoprotein and beyond. Trends Cardiovasc Med. (2022) 32:181–94. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2021.04.002,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Bjornson, E, Adiels, M, Taskinen, MR, Burgess, S, Chapman, MJ, Packard, CJ, et al. Lipoprotein(a) is markedly more atherogenic than LDL: an apolipoprotein B-based genetic analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2024) 83:385–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.039,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Macchiaiolo, M, Gagliardi, MG, Toscano, A, Guccione, P, and Bartuli, A. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Lancet. (2012) 379:1330. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61476-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Sjoberg, BG, Straniero, S, Angelin, B, and Rudling, M. Cholestyramine treatment of healthy humans rapidly induces transient hypertriglyceridemia when treatment is initiated. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. (2017) 313:E167–74. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00416.2016,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Beuers, U, Wolters, F, and Oude Elferink, RPJ. Mechanisms of pruritus in cholestasis: understanding and treating the itch. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2023) 20:26–36. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00687-7,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Scaldaferri, F, Pizzoferrato, M, Ponziani, FR, Gasbarrini, G, and Gasbarrini, A. Use and indications of cholestyramine and bile acid sequestrants. Intern Emerg Med. (2013) 8:205–10. doi: 10.1007/s11739-011-0653-0,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Selim, R, and Ahn, J. Pruritus in chronic liver disease. Clin Liver Dis. (2023) 27:47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2022.08.011

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Hutcheon, DF, Bayless, TM, and Gadacz, TR. Postcholecystectomy diarrhea. JAMA. (1979) 241:823–4. doi: 10.1001/jama.1979.03290340041024

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Muchiri, RN, Rocha, J, Tandon, A, Chen, YL, Alemani, R, Ahmad, I, et al. Short-term treatment with cholestyramine increases long-acting anticoagulant rodenticide clearance from rabbits without affecting plasma vitamin K1 levels or blood coagulation. Toxicol Sci. (2024) 200:137–45. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfae053,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Xu, X, Guo, Q, Li, Y, Zhai, C, Mao, Y, Zhang, Y, et al. Assessing the real-world safety of regadenoson for myocardial perfusion imaging: insights from a comprehensive analysis of FAERS data. J Clin Med. (2025) 14:1860. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061860,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Ray, KK, Bays, HE, Catapano, AL, Lalwani, ND, Bloedon, LT, Sterling, LR, et al. Safety and efficacy of bempedoic acid to reduce LDL cholesterol. N Engl J Med. (2019) 380:1022–32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803917,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Lamb, YN. Rosuvastatin/ezetimibe: a review in hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. (2020) 20:381–92. doi: 10.1007/s40256-020-00421-1,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Stehbens, WE. Coronary heart disease, hypercholesterolemia, and atherosclerosis. II. Misrepresented data. Exp Mol Pathol. (2001) 70:120–39. doi: 10.1006/exmp.2000.2339,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Gershkovich, P, Sivak, O, Contreras-Whitney, S, Darlington, JW, and Wasan, KM. Assessment of cholesterol absorption inhibitors nanostructured aluminosilicate and cholestyramine using in vitro lipolysis model. J Pharm Sci. (2012) 101:291–300. doi: 10.1002/jps.22770,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Lerose, R, Musto, P, Aieta, M, Papa, C, and Tartarone, A. Off-label use of anti-cancer drugs between clinical practice and research: the Italian experience. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. (2012) 68:505–12. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1173-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Saiyed, MM, Ong, PS, and Chew, L. Off-label drug use in oncology: a systematic review of literature. J Clin Pharm Ther. (2017) 42:251–8. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12507,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Fass, R, Boeckxstaens, GE, El-Serag, H, Rosen, R, Sifrim, D, and Vaezi, MF. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2021) 7:55. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00287-w,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Argüero, J, and Sifrim, D. Pathophysiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: implications for diagnosis and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2024) 21:282–93. doi: 10.1038/s41575-023-00883-z

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Panahi, Y, Khedmat, H, Valizadegan, G, Mohtashami, R, and Sahebkar, A. Efficacy and safety of Aloe vera syrup for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a pilot randomized positive-controlled trial. J Tradit Chin Med. (2015) 35:632–6. doi: 10.1016/s0254-6272(15)30151-5,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Chey, WD, Kurlander, J, and Eswaran, S. Irritable bowel syndrome: a clinical review. JAMA. (2015) 313:949–58. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.0954,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Bonetto, S, Fagoonee, S, Battaglia, E, Grassini, M, Saracco, GM, and Pellicano, R. Recent advances in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Pol Arch Intern Med. (2021) 131:709–15. doi: 10.20452/pamw.16067,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Di Rosa, C, Altomare, A, Terrigno, V, Carbone, F, Tack, J, Cicala, M, et al. Constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C): effects of different nutritional patterns on intestinal dysbiosis and symptoms. Nutrients. (2023) 15:1647. doi: 10.3390/nu15071647 37049488,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Patkova, B, and Wester, T. Anal fissure in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg. (2020) 30:391–4. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716723

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Baunwall, SMD, Andreasen, SE, Hansen, MM, Kelsen, J, Høyer, KL, Rågård, N, et al. Faecal microbiota transplantation for first or second Clostridioides difficile infection (EarlyFMT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2022) 7:1083–91. doi: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00276-x,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Radovanovic-Dinic, B, Tesic-Rajkovic, S, Grgov, S, Petrovic, G, and Zivkovic, V. Irritable bowel syndrome—from etiopathogenesis to therapy. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. (2018) 162:1–9. doi: 10.5507/bp.2017.057,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Tang, M, and Kalim, S. Long-term glycemic variability: a variable glycemic metric entangled with glycated hemoglobin. Am J Kidney Dis. (2023) 82:254–6. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.06.001,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Silver, B, Ramaiya, K, Andrew, SB, Fredrick, O, Bajaj, S, Kalra, S, et al. EADSG guidelines: insulin therapy in diabetes. Diabetes Ther. (2018) 9:449–92. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0384-6,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Hoang, K, Ly, A, and Hill, D. Effect of glycemic variability on infectious outcomes in critically ill burn patients. Burns J Int Soc Burn Inj. (2024) 50:1555–61. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.03.037,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Marasca, B, Ndokaj, A, Duś-Ilnicka, I, Nisii, A, Marasca, R, Bossù, M, et al. Management of transverse root fractures in dental trauma. Dent Med Probl. (2022) 59:637–45. doi: 10.17219/dmp/145895,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Ziscovici, C, Lucas, PW, Constantino, PJ, Bromage, TG, and van Casteren, A. Sea otter dental enamel is highly resistant to chipping due to its microstructure. Biol Lett. (2014) 10:20140484. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0484,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Sunderland, KM, Beaton, D, Arnott, SR, Kleinstiver, P, and Binns, MA. The ontario neurodegenerative disease research initiative. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (2020).

Google Scholar