ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Healthcare Professions Education
Efficacy of an Integrated Case-Based Learning and Team-Based Learning Model within the Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan Framework in Physical Therapy Education
Ruike Zhang 1
Minglei Huang 2
Yiqi Yang 2
Jiaqiao Yan 2
Zhiying Wu 2
Jiaxin Yuan 2
Adila Aisaiti 2
Shiyan Jiang 2
Zhenfeng Guo 3
Kai Shi 3
Hongxin Chen 3
Qinglu Luo 3
Tao Huang 1
1. Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
2. The Fifth Clinical College of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
3. The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Background: Conventional "lecture+demonstration" pedagogy in physical therapy (PT) education frequently constrains student engagement and the evolution of clinical reasoning. The Physical Therapy for Orthopaedic Diseases (PTOD) course necessitates strong clinical reasoning and collaboration, which the mixed approach of case-based learning (CBL) and team-based learning (TBL), along with the SOAP framework, aims to improve. Methods: This study employed a quasi-experimental design to analyze data collected from Guangzhou Medical University (GZMU) between March 2023 and June 2024. A total of 46 third-year physiotherapy students (2020 cohort: n = 25, CBL+TBL; 2021 cohort: n = 21, traditional teaching) completed the study. Baseline comparability between the two groups was ensured by comparing routinely collected academic performance data and questionnaire responses obtained prior to the start of the course. The 2020 cohort had participated in role-shifting SOAP activities using actual cases, whereas the 2021 cohort had received lecture-based teaching accompanied by SOAP framework. Outcomes included questionnaire scores (Self-assessment, Self-directed learning, Group-cooperation, Teacher-assessment, Learning-effectiveness, Learning-satisfaction) and academic performance (class performance, practical performance, theoretical scores) were analysed. Results: The 2020 cohort markedly outperformed the 2021 cohort in total scores of questionnaires (P < 0.001) and in the sub-dimensions of Self-assessment (P < 0.01), Self-directed learning (P < 0.05), Group cooperation (P < 0.001), and Learning satisfaction (P < 0.05). In the 2020 cohort, pre-post enhancements were statistically significant in total scores (P < 0.001) and the corresponding sub-dimensions (P < 0.001). The 2021 cohort exhibited a notable reduction in group cooperation (P < 0.05). Overall grades indicated no significant difference (P > 0.05); however, the 2020 cohort demonstrated superior class performance (P < 0.01) and practical performance (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The CBL+TBL model, combined with the SOAP framework, markedly improves students' clinical reasoning, practical abilities, and learning engagement in the PTOD course, providing a more effective alternative to traditional teaching methods for rehabilitation education reform.
Summary
Keywords
Case-based learning, clinical reasoning, Physical therapy education, SOAP framework, team-based learning
Received
15 December 2025
Accepted
04 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Zhang, Huang, Yang, Yan, Wu, Yuan, Aisaiti, Jiang, Guo, Shi, Chen, Luo and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Tao Huang
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.