SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Med.
Sec. Rheumatology
Exercise Prescription for Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Provisionally accepted- 1Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China
- 2Caoxian People's Hospital, Heze, China
- 3Shanghai Jiading District Zhenxin Community Health Service Center., Shanghai, China
- 4Jiading Industrial Zone Community Health Service Center, shanghai, China
- 5Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Second Hospital, Shenyang, China
- 6Northeastern University, Shenyang, China
- 7Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic condition that significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Exercise therapy serves as a core non-pharmacological treatment modality, yet its overall efficacy and optimal prescription parameters require further clarification through high-quality evidence. This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy of exercise interventions for axSpA patients. Methods: Computerised searches were conducted across databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, covering the period from inception to September 2025. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing exercise interventions with conventional treatments for axSpA were included. Two researchers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. The heterogeneity of the research results was assessed using the I² statistic. Continuous variables were presented as weighted mean differences or standard mean differences, with confidence intervals set at 95%. Stata 15.0 was utilised to conduct a meta-analysis. Results: Fifteen RCTs involving 1,699 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that exercise intervention significantly improved disease activity in axSpA patients compared with controls (BASDAI: SMD = −0.75, 95% CI: −1.19 to −0.31; ASDAS: SMD = −0.91, 95% CI: −1.54 to −0.29), physical function (BASFI: SMD = −0.37, 95% CI: −0.47 to −0.26), spinal mobility (BASMI: SMD = −0.26, 95% CI: -0.49 to -0.04), thoracic expansion (SMD = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.65), and fatigue levels (SMD = -0.53, 95% CI: -0.78 to -0.28). Subgroup analyses indicated that different exercise modalities and intervention durations influenced treatment efficacy. Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirms that exercise interventions significantly improve core outcome measures including disease activity, physical function, spinal mobility, and fatigue in patients with axial spondyloarthritis, with statistically significant effects. The findings support the incorporation of individualised exercise prescriptions as a key component of standard axSpA treatment, providing evidence-based guidance for clinical practice. Future research should further optimise exercise prescription parameters and validate their long-term efficacy.
Keywords: ankylosing spondylitis, Exercise Therapy, meta-analyses, Prescription, randomised controlled trials, Systematic reviews
Received: 08 Jan 2026; Accepted: 09 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Yu, Guo, Gao, Shen, Ma, Li, Wu and Cai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Weifei Wu
Junhao Cai
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
