ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mol. Biosci.

Sec. Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2025.1616675

Shared molecular profiles of post-laser vision correction ectasia and keratoconus with key differences in CADPS, CPT1B, CIITA, and TBC1D4

Provisionally accepted
Katarzyna  Jaskiewicz-RajewiczKatarzyna Jaskiewicz-Rajewicz1Alicja  WysockaAlicja Wysocka1Magdalena  Maleszka-KurpielMagdalena Maleszka-Kurpiel2,3Eliza  Matuszewska-MachEliza Matuszewska-Mach4Jakub  WozniakJakub Wozniak5,6Rafal  PloskiRafal Ploski7Jan  MatysiakJan Matysiak4Malgorzata  RydzaniczMalgorzata Rydzanicz7Marzena  GajeckaMarzena Gajecka1,5*
  • 1Institute of Human Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznań, Poland
  • 2Optegra Eye Health Care Clinic, Poznan, Poland
  • 3Chair of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
  • 4Chair and Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
  • 5Chair and Department of Genetics and Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
  • 6Department of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland
  • 7Department of Medical Genetics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Masovian, Poland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Post-laser vision correction (post-LVC) ectasia is a serious complication of 0.033-0.66% of corneal refractive surgeries. Post-LVC ectasia, likewise keratoconus (KTCN) is classified under the "ectatic diseases" category. We hypothesize that, although the mechanistic aspects of post-LVC ectasia and KTCN are distinct, there are notable similarities in the epithelial responses, including shared molecular features. The 11 post-LVC ectasia, 8 mild myopia (controls), and 28 KTCN patients were included in the retrospective multi-omics casecontrol study. CE samples were separated into topographic regions (TRs), central, middle, and peripheral, and 159 experimental samples were subjected to transcriptome (RNA-Seq) and proteome (MALDI-TOF/TOF MS/MS) profiling. Obtained results were verified/validated using RT-qPCR, immunofluorescence staining, and confocal microscopy in the extended sample set (n=21). Residual stromal bed, stromal ablation depth, and percent tissue altered indices best predicted the risk of post-LVC ectasia. Comparing post-LVC ectasia and KTCN, interferon-alpha and interferon-gamma hallmarks were recognized as downregulated in the central and middle TRs of CE of patients with post-LVC ectasia. The downregulation of CADPS gene expression in all three TRs in the extended CE sample set was confirmed. In CE samples, cytoplasmic localization of CIITA and TBC1D4 proteins, the candidate post-LVC ectasia-specific biomarkers, was demonstrated. The assessment of CADPS, CPT1B, CIITA, and TBC1D4 gene expression could enhance the ectasia risk estimation in patients. CE of patients with post-LVC ectasia, apart from differences in transcription and inflammation processes, exhibits similar molecular features to KTCN.

Keywords: post-laser vision ectasia, post-SMILE ectasia, Post-lasik ectasia, Keratoconus, Corneal epithelium, Transcriptomics, Proteomics

Received: 23 Apr 2025; Accepted: 20 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Jaskiewicz-Rajewicz, Wysocka, Maleszka-Kurpiel, Matuszewska-Mach, Wozniak, Ploski, Matysiak, Rydzanicz and Gajecka. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Marzena Gajecka, Institute of Human Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznań, Poland

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.