ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mol. Biosci.

Sec. Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2025.1619139

This article is part of the Research TopicIntegrative Multi-Omics Approaches for Predicting Immunotherapy Efficacy in Solid TumorsView all 9 articles

Value of the 14-Gene Molecular Assay in Efficacy Assessment of Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Provisionally accepted
Xuyan  LanXuyan Lan1,2*Xiaoyu  SunXiaoyu Sun1,2Ruiqi  ChenRuiqi Chen1,2Lihuan  ZhuLihuan Zhu2Xiaojie  PanXiaojie Pan2*Tianxing  GuoTianxing Guo2*
  • 1Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
  • 2Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To evaluate the predictive accuracy of the 14-gene molecular assay in determining treatment response among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT). Additionally, the study aims to investigate its correlation with tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels and the status of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) in the tumor microenvironment.Methods: Patients with NSCLC who underwent nICT followed by surgical resection at Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital between February 2019 and December 2022 were retrospectively included. Risk stratification was performed using the 14-gene quantitative PCR expression assay. The percentage of residual viable tumor cells (%RVT), TIL, and TLS within the primary lesion were evaluated through hematoxylin and eosin staining of surgical specimens. Subsequently, correlations were analyzed between the 14-gene molecular risk stratification and pathological response, as well as between the 14-gene molecular risk stratification and patient prognosis.Results: A total of 114 patients were included. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was significantly higher in the 14-gene low-risk group, while the RVT was notably lower (both P<0.05). Additionally, the low-risk group showed significantly elevated levels of TIL and positivity for TLS (both P<0.05). Survival analysis revealed that patients in the low-risk group had markedly longer disease-free survival (DFS) compared to those in the intermediate-risk and highrisk groups (both P<0.05). Univariate Cox regression analysis identified pathological TNM stage, vascular invasion, pathological response, and 14-gene molecular risk stratification as significant factors influencing DFS (all P<0.05). Furthermore, multivariate analysis confirmed that the 14gene risk stratification was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR=2.496, 95% CI: 1.264-4.931, P=0.008).The 14-gene molecular assay demonstrated that low-risk status correlates with improved pathological response and prognosis, potentially attributable to higher TLS positivity rates and increased TIL infiltration. This assay offers critical insights for refining neoadjuvant treatment strategies in patients with NSCLC.

Keywords: Non-small cell lung cancer, 14-gene molecular assay, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Pathological response, prognostic biomarker

Received: 27 Apr 2025; Accepted: 24 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Lan, Sun, Chen, Zhu, Pan and Guo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Xuyan Lan, Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
Xiaojie Pan, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China
Tianxing Guo, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.