Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common neurodegenerative disorder, is the leading cause of dementia. Neuritic plaque, one of the major characteristics of AD neuropathology, mainly consists of amyloid β (Aβ) protein. Aβ is derived from amyloid precursor protein (APP) by sequential cleavages of β- and γ-secretase. Although APP upregulation can promote AD pathogenesis by facilitating Aβ production, growing evidence indicates that aberrant post-translational modifications and trafficking of APP play a pivotal role in AD pathogenesis by dysregulating APP processing and Aβ generation. In this report, we reviewed the current knowledge of APP modifications and trafficking as well as their role in APP processing. More importantly, we discussed the effect of aberrant APP modifications and trafficking on Aβ generation and the underlying mechanisms, which may provide novel strategies for drug development in AD.
Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common neurodegenerative disorder leading to dementia, accounts for ~75% of dementia cases (ADI World Alzheimer Report, ; Korvatska et al., 2015). The rapid increase of AD prevalence is a challenge to the public health and causes a huge socioeconomic burden worldwide. However, no effective treatment has been developed. Progressive memory loss is often the earliest sign of AD, while the impairment of other cognitive functions and psychosis are also presented (Hort et al., ; McKhann et al., 2011; Segal-Gidan et al., 2011).
Early-onset AD (EOAD) and late-onset AD (LOAD), occurring before and after the age of 65 years, respectively, are the two types of AD. Less than 5% of AD cases are EOAD (Alzheimer’s Association, ). EOAD is caused by genetic alterations, including pathogenic mutations in the amyloid-β precursor protein (APP) gene (Goldgaber et al., ; Kang et al., 1987; Robakis et al., 1987; St. George-Hyslop et al., 1987; Tanzi et al., 1987), presenilin 1 (PSEN1) gene (Mullan et al., 1992; Schellenberg et al., 1992; St. George-Hyslop et al., 1992; Li et al., 1995; Sherrington et al., 1995) and presenilin 2 (PSEN2) gene (Levy-Lahad et al., 1995a,b; Rogaev et al., 1995), a duplication of APP locus, as well as trisomy of chromosome 21 causing Down syndrome (DS; Campion et al., ; Bettens et al., ). The etiology of LOAD is not yet fully understood. A combination of multiple factors is believed to contribute to the pathogenesis of LOAD, including aging, genetics, nutrition, lifestyle and chronic metabolic disorders (ADI; Qiu et al., 2009; Yang and Song, 2013; Kang et al., 2017; Zeng et al., 2017; Zhang and Song, 2017). Among them, aging has been demonstrated as the greatest risk factor of AD. Due to the rapid increase in global aging population, the AD prevalence will be continuously increased worldwide (ADI; Korvatska et al., 2015).
Both EOAD and LOAD share the same pathological hallmarks in the brain, including extraneuronal neuritic plaques, intraneuronal neurofibrillary tangles and synaptic/neuronal loss leading to brain atrophy. As one of the major characteristics of AD neuropathology, neuritic plaque is mainly composed of amyloid β (Aβ), which was first identified by Glenner and Wong (). Thus, it has been proposed that Aβ overloading and plaque formation initiate the cascade of AD pathogenesis and also contribute to other pathological features, such as neurofibrillary tangles and synaptic/neuronal loss (Hardy and Higgins, ). Recent studies suggested that soluble Aβ oligomers might be the main culprit of neuron toxicity. Thus, amyloid hypothesis has been revised to propose that Aβ oligomers play a more important role in AD pathogenesis than mature amyloid fibrils do, indicating that reducing Aβ generation, facilitating Aβ clearance and blocking Aβ oligomerization would be potential strategies to inhibit the pathogenesis of AD (Sun et al., 2006a; Walsh and Selkoe, 2007; Qing et al., 2008; Karran et al., 2011; Ly et al., 2013; Dong et al., ).
Aβ is derived from sequential cleavages of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β- and γ-secretase. Over 30 pathogenic mutations in APP have been identified to cause early-onset familial AD due to the dysregulation of Aβ generation (Deng et al., ; Zhang S. et al., 2017). Overexpression of APP results in the elevation of Aβ levels, which is also implicated in AD pathogenesis (Brouwers et al., ; Rovelet-Lecrux et al., 2006, 2007; Sleegers et al., 2006; Ryoo et al., 2007; Kasuga et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2011, 2014; Long et al., 2012; Wu and Song, 2013; Yang et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2014, 2015; Song et al., 2015). For example, rare cases with APP locus duplication develop EOAD (Rovelet-Lecrux et al., 2006, 2007; Sleegers et al., 2006; Kasuga et al., 2009). In addition, DS patients with an extra copy of APP gene show the increase of APP expression and Aβ generation in the brain, which is associated with the development of AD neuropathology (Ryoo et al., 2007; Sun et al., 2011, 2014; Wu and Song, 2013; Wu et al., 2014, 2015; Song et al., 2015). Moreover, AD-associated mutations within APP gene promoter region also enhance APP expression (Brouwers et al., ). The downregulation of MiR-106b or MiR-153, targeting APP mRNA, has been observed in patients of sporadic AD with the elevation of APP mRNA (Long et al., 2012). More importantly, emerging evidence shows that alterations of APP trafficking and post-translational modifications have significant effects on APP processing and Aβ production. Therefore, we aim to introduce the current knowledge of APP modifications and trafficking, review their important roles in APP processing and Aβ generation, and discuss the effect of aberrant post-translational modifications and trafficking on Aβ generation, which may provide novel strategies for drug development in AD.
APP Gene and Protein
The human APP gene is located on chromosome 21q21.3, spanning approximately 290,586bp of genomic DNA (Goldgaber et al., ; Kang et al., 1987; Robakis et al., 1987; Tanzi et al., 1987; Yoshikai et al., 1990; Lamb et al., 1993). By alternative splicing, approximate ten APP variants are generated, encoding APP isoforms with 639–770 amino acids. The three major isoforms are APP695, APP751 and APP770, all of which can generate Aβ after sequential cleavages by β- and γ- secretase (Neve et al., 1988; Tanzi et al., 1988; Zimmermann et al., 1988; Kang and Müller-Hill, 1990; Sisodia et al., 1993).
APP is ubiquitously expressed in human tissues with high expression in the central nervous system (CNS). Both APP751 and APP770 isoforms are mainly expressed in non-neuronal cells, while APP695 isoform is predominantly expressed in neurons. As the major isoform in human brains, APP695 expression is markedly increased during neuronal differentiation (Kang and Müller-Hill, 1990; Sisodia et al., 1993). The three isoforms share the conserved protein structure with a larger extracellular domain, a short transmembrane domain and a cytoplasmic domain (Muresan and Ladescu Muresan, 2015). The large ectodomain includes a cysteine-rich globular domain (E1), an acidic domain (AC), a helix-rich domain (E2) and a part of the Aβ domain extending into the transmembrane domain. The short cytoplasmic domain (the intracellular C-terminal domain) contains a conserved YENPTY motif responsible for the protein interactions. E1 domain contains a heparin-binding site (HBD) and a metal-binding domain (MBD) with copper and zinc binding sites. The E2 domain is composed of six α-helices forming a coiled-coil substructure. Both APP770 and APP751 contain a Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitors (KPI) domain following the AC. In addition, APP770 contains an OX2 domain following the KPI domain. APP plays numerous functions, such as neuronal differentiation, neurogenesis, synaptic function, apoptosis and cell proliferation (Bolós et al., ; Milosch et al., 2014; Fanutza et al., ; Wu et al., 2015, 2016).
APP Processing and Aβ Generation
Overview of APP Processing and Aβ Generation
Although Aβ is a well-known proteolytic product of APP, APP indeed undergoes both non-amyloidogenic and amyloidogenic pathways mediated by sequential cleavages of α-/β-/θ-/η-secretase and γ-secretase (Figure 1). The majority of APP undergoes non-amyloidogenic pathway. First, APP is cleaved by α-secretase to generate a N-terminal secreted APP (sAPPα) and C-terminal fragment (CTF) of 83 amino acids (C83) which is further cleaved by γ-secretase to release a 3 kDa product (P3) and APP intracellular domain (AICD). In addition, beta-site APP cleaving enzyme 2 (BACE2) is a θ-secretase, which is implicated in APP processing without Aβ generation (Sun et al., 2006b; Liu et al., 2013). The minority of APP is cleaved by β-secretase at Asp1 (β site) and Glu11 (β’ site, numbering for Aβ) sites, respectively. Glu11 is the major β-cleavage site to yield a CTF with 89 amino acids (C89), which is further cleaved by γ-secretase to produce a truncated Aβ11-40/42. Asp1 is the minor β-cleavage site to generate a CTF with 99 amino acids (C99; Deng et al., ). C99 is further cleaved by γ-secretase to produce Aβ (Liu et al., 2002; Deng et al., ). Recently, η-secretase, e.g., membrane type 5 matrix metalloproteinase (MT5-MMP), is revealed to be involved in APP processing (Willem et al., 2015).
Figure 1
α-Secretase
Although α-secretase is not yet fully defined, three a disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAM) family members (ADAM9, ADAM10 and ADAM17) may feature α-secretase activity. α-cleavage predominantly occurs at plasma membrane (PM) to generate sAPPα and C83 excluding Aβ production, which is the major proteolytic process of APP at PM (Sisodia, 1992). The activity of α-secretase in Trans-Golgi-Network (TGN) v is regulated by multiple factors such as protein kinase C (PKC; Skovronsky et al., 2000).
Beta-Site APP Cleaving Enzyme 1
BACE1, the dominant β-secretase in vivo, is a type-I transmembrane protein with 501 amino acids (Sun et al., 2012). The trafficking of BACE1 has been reviewed previously (Zhang and Song, 2013; Agostinho et al., ; Toh and Gleeson, 2016). Briefly, it is synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-bound polysomes as immature BACE1. Along the secretory pathway, BACE1 undergoes a series of post-translational- modifications in the ER and Golgi apparatus, becoming mature. Mature BACE1 is internalized through endosomes to lysosomes for degradation. It is also transported to the TGN via the retrograde route or recycled to the PM. BACE1 mainly localizes in the TGN and endosome where the acidic environment is optimal for BACE1 activity (Vassar et al., 1999). Thus, β-cleavage mainly occurs in the post-Golgi secretory compartments and endosomal/lysosome organelles (Koo and Squazzo, 1994; Haass et al., ; Munger et al., 1995). However, accumulated evidence has shown that intracellular β-secretase cleavage also occurs in ER/ER-Golgi Intermediate Compartment (ERGIC), indicating that acidic pH is not essential for BACE1 activity (Chyung et al., ). More importantly, the site preference of β-cleavage is mainly determined by the subcellular location and modification of BACE1 (Huse et al., ; Wang et al., 2014). Asp1 is the major BACE1 cleavage site in the ER resulting in C99 generation, which contributes to Aβ generation. However, Glu11 is the predominant β-cleavage site in the TGN, leading to C89 generation without the subsequent Aβ production. In addition, lipid raft is the preferred microdomain for β-secretase cleavage (Zhang and Song, 2013). Many BACE1 inhibitors have been developed for AD treatment by inhibiting the generation of Aβ (Godyń et al., ; Hung and Fu, ). However, none of them is approved so far.
θ-Secretase
BACE2, the homolog of BACE1, consists of 518 amino acids (Sun et al., 2005). BACE2 is a θ-secretase, which predominantly cleaves APP at Phe19 within the Aβ domain to yield CTF of 80 amino acids (C80) excluding Aβ generation (Figure 1; Sun et al., 2006b; Liu et al., 2013). Consistently, no Aβ overproduction and cognitive deficits were observed in BACE2 transgenic mice (Azkona et al., ; Bacher et al., ). Despite of high homology, the expression of BACE2 and BACE1 is differentially regulated at transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels (Sun et al., 2005, 2006b). BACE1 is predominantly expressed in neurons, whereas BACE2 expression is extremely low in the brain (Bennett et al., ; Marcinkiewicz and Seidah, 2000).
γ-Secretase
γ-secretase is a protein complex consisting of presenilins (PSEN1 and PSEN2), nicastrin, APH-1 and PEN-2, which cleaves APP following α-/β-/θ-secretase cleavage. PSEN1 and PSEN2 are the core catalytic subunits of γ-secretase, while nicastrin, APH-1 and PEN-2 are the regulatory subunits playing a key role in the maturation and stabilization of the complex (De Strooper et al., , ; Song et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 2000, 2013; Takasugi et al., 2003). In addition, Chen et al. () showed that TMP21, a vesicle trafficking protein, is a component of γ-secretase, and its dysregulation and SNPs significantly affect Aβ generation (Chen et al., ; Zhang X. et al., 2017). Studies suggest that all the components of the complex are synthesized and mainly localized in the ER (Walter et al., 1996). Most evidence supports that the assembly and maturation processes, mainly occurring in the compartments of the secretory pathway, are crucial for γ-secretase activity, although one report showed that presenilins are not required for Aβ generation in the early secretory pathway (Wilson et al., 2002; Zhao et al., 2004; Capell et al., ). The details of γ-secretase trafficking and assembly have been extensively reviewed (Zhang et al., 2013; Agostinho et al., ). The active γ-secretase is mainly localized in late endosome and lysosome system (Kanatsu et al., 2014). However, the γ-cleavage has also been observed in the ER, TGN and at PM (Munger et al., 1995; Walter et al., 1996; Maltese et al., 2001; Zhao et al., 2004; Capell et al., ; Kaether et al., ). Targeting γ-cleavage is a well-known strategy for AD treatment by inhibiting Aβ generation. Although many γ-cleavage inhibitors have been developed, none of them is approved for clinical application (Godyń et al., ; Hung and Fu, ).
η-Secretase
Membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) was first revealed to be involved in APP processing (Higashi and Miyazaki, ). Later on, Ahmad et al. () found that MT3-MMP and MT5-MMP also contribute to APP processing. However, MT3-MMP has no effect on Aβ generation (Ahmad et al., ). Recently, Willem et al. (2015) demonstrated that MT5-MMP has η-secretase activity, which cleaves APP695 at amino acids 504–505 to generate a higher molecular mass carboxy-terminal fragment of APP, termed CTF-η (C191). C191 is enriched in an AD mouse model and human AD brains and it could be further processed by α- and β-secretase generating Aη-α and Aη-β, respectively (Figure 1; Willem et al., 2015). Aη-α significantly inhibits long-term potentiation in vitro and in vivo (Willem et al., 2015). However, the generation of C83, C99, C89 and downstream cleavage products following η-cleavage remains elusive although Baranger et al. (, ) reported that MT5-MMP is a pro-amyloidogenic secretase, promoting amyloid pathology and cognitive decline in AD model mice.
Aβ Generation Along the Secretory Pathway
Aβ, the major component of senile plaques in AD brains, is generated through sequential cleavages of APP by β- and γ-secretase. The trafficking-dependent co-residence of APP and secreatases plays a key role in the Aβ generation. However, the subcellular location of Aβ production is not fully defined. Several studies have shown that Aβ is mainly generated in the endosome/lysosome where the acidic environment facilitates the activity of β- and γ-secretase (Golde et al., ; Koo et al., 1996; Yamazaki et al., 1996; Kanatsu et al., 2014). In contrast, a large body of evidence indicates that Aβ is also generated along the secretory pathway, including ER, Golgi and TGN (Busciglio et al., ; Stephens and Austen, 1996; Cook et al., ; Hartmann et al., ; Tomita et al., 1998; Greenfield et al., ; McFarlane et al., 1999). It has been found that Aβ42 instead of Aβ40 is generated in the ER of neurons (Cook et al., ; Hartmann et al., ; Greenfield et al., ). Consistently, ER retention signal or BFA treatment-induced ER retention of APP increases the level of Aβ42. Since both α- and β-secretases exert their cleavages in the TGN, there is a competition between α-secretase and β-secretase for APP cleavage (Skovronsky et al., 2000).
APP Modifications and Trafficking in Aβ Generation
APP Trafficking and Co-Residence with Secretases
As a type I transmembrane protein, APP trafficks through the classic secretory, endo-lysosome and recycling pathways (Figure 2). After synthesized in the membrane-bound polysomes, the N-terminal signal peptide is removed during its translocation into the ER. Then, it transports to the Golgi apparatus and TGN via ERGIC. Finally, approximately 10% nascent APP reaches the PM, while the majority of APP resides in the Golgi apparatus and TGN. APP at PM is mainly cleaved by α-secretase to release sAPP and C83. The uncleaved APP on the cell surface is rapidly internalized into the endosome, which is mediated by its C-terminal “YENPTY” motif. The internalized APP is sorted into three pathways. Most APP is sorted into late endosome-lysosome pathway for degradation while a small fraction of APP is recycled back to the cell surface or retrograded to the TGN (Haass et al., ). Moreover, part of APP at TGN could be directly sorted into the endosome. APP and its fragments have also been detected in the mitochondria, cytoplasm and nuclear. However, the detailed routes and processes remain elusive since the holo-APP and multiple APP fragments may traffic through different pathways (Muresan and Ladescu Muresan, 2015). Furthermore, the trafficking of APP plays a key role in APP processing as the co-residence of APP with secretases (e.g., α-, β-, γ-secretase) along the secretory pathway and organelle-specific secretase activity significantly affect APP processing and Aβ generation (Figure 2; Zhang and Song, 2013; Zhang et al., 2013; Agostinho et al., ). For example, α-cleavage predominantly occurs at PM (Sisodia, 1992), while β-cleavage mainly occurs in the endosome and lysosome (Koo and Squazzo, 1994; Haass et al., ; Munger et al., 1995).
Figure 2
Post-Translational Modifications of APP
During the constitutive secretory pathway, APP undergoes extensive post-translational modifications, including N-glycosylation (N-Gly) and O-glycosylation (O-Gly), phosphorylation, sulfation, palmitoylation, ubiquitination and sumoylation. The residue numbering in the following corresponds to the APP695, unless otherwise indicated.
Glycosylation
When the nascent APP translocates into the ER, N-Gly is catalyzed by the oligosaccharyl transferase (OST) complex with the addition of a precursor oligosaccharide to the luminal side of a polypeptide chain, forming the immature APP. Two asparagine sites, Asn467 and Asn496, are predicted to be glycosylated although only the former one has been confirmed (Pahlsson et al., 1992). However, Yazaki et al. (1996) showed that deletion of either Asn467 or Asn496 leads to a decrease of APP molecular weight in COS-1 cells, which indirectly indicates that both sites are N-glycosylated. O-Gly of APP occurs in Golgi apparatus to form the mature APP. Multiple O-Gly sites of APP have been identified by both in vitro and in vivo studies. Thr291, Thr292, Thr576 and Thr353 (numbering of APP770) are found to be O-Glycosylated in cultures (Perdivara et al., 2009). The O-Gly of Ser597, Ser606, Ser611, Thr616, Thr634, Thr635, Ser662 and Ser680 (numbering of APP770) has also been identified in human CSF (Halim et al., ). In addition to the classical O-GalNAcylation, O-GlcNAcylation is another form of O-Gly and characterized by the addition of a single β-N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) to the residue of serine or threonine (Griffith et al., ). Alteration of O-GlcNAcylation in APP plays an important role in regulating APP processing and Aβ generation (Jacobsen and Iverfeldt, ; Chun et al., ).
Phosphorylation
Although APP is a phosphoprotein, the fully glycosylated (N-and O-glycosylated) APP is preferred to be phosphorylated (Gandy et al., ; Weidemann et al., 1989; Hung and Selkoe, ; Oishi et al., 1997). Ten phosphorylated sites of APP have been identified, including two sites in the ectodomain (Ser198 and Ser206) and eight sites in the cytoplasmic domain (Tyr653, Tyr682, Tyr687, Ser655, Ser675, Thr654, Thr668 and Thr686; Gandy et al., ; Walter et al., 1997; Lee et al., 2003). Under basal conditions, two phosphorylated serine residues (Ser198 and Ser206) could be detected in the ectodomain of APP and Ser198 is the major phosphorylated site compared with Ser206 (Hung and Selkoe, ; Walter et al., 1997).
More studies about APP phosphorylation focus on the residues within the cytoplasmic domain. Ser655 can be phosphorylated by PKC, while Ca++/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II is involved in the phosphorylation of both Ser655 and Thr654 during in vitro culture (Gandy et al., ; Suzuki et al., 1992). Moreover, Ser655 can be phosphorylated by APP kinase I in vivo (Isohara et al., ). Oishi et al. (1997) has reported that okadaic acid, a protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) and PP2A inhibitor, increases Ser655 phosphorylation, suggesting that phosphatases are also involved in the regulation of Ser655 phosphorylation. Phosphorylation of Ser655 is mainly detected in the mature APP, whereas Thr668 is the most common phosphorylated site in the immature APP (Oishi et al., 1997). The phosphorylation of Thr668 occurs in the ER and is cell-cycle dependent (Muresan and Muresan, 2012). Multiple kinases, such as glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β), cyclin dependent kinase 5 (CDK5), CDK1, stress-activated protein kinase1β (SAPK1β), dual-specificity tyrosinephosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A) and c-Jun N-terminal protein kinase (JNK) are involved in the process of its phosphorylation (Suzuki et al., 1994; Aplin et al., ; Oishi et al., 1997; Iijima et al., ; Standen et al., 2001; Ryoo et al., 2008; Mazzitelli et al., 2011). In addition, a couple of phosphatases, such as PP1, PP2A, PP2B are also involved in the regulation of Thr668 phosphorylation (Oliveira et al., 2015).
Palmitoylation
Palmitoylation is a common way of protein modifications with the addition of fatty acids to a cysteine residue, which is regulated by both palmitoyl acyltransferases and acyl protein thioesterases. Protein palmitoylation is involved in the regulation of protein trafficking and protein-protein interactions. Around 10% of APP undergoes palmitoylation, mainly occurring in ER (Bhattacharyya et al., ). Recently, Bhattacharyya et al. () has reported that APP palmitoylation is mediated by two palmitoyl acyltransferases, DHHC-7 and DHHC-21, and Cys186 and Cys187 are two palmitoylated sites in APP.
Ubiquitination
Ubiquitination can modify the target protein by attaching ubiquitin, a small protein with 76 amino acids, to the lysine residues. It is catalyzed by ubiquitin-activating enzymes, ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and ubiquitin ligases. Protein ubiquitination is implicated in the processes including protein degradation, trafficking and protein-protein interactions. Recent studies have identified a couple of ubiquitination sites within the cytoplasmic domain of APP, including Lys649–651, Lys651 and Lys688 (Kaneko et al., 2010; El Ayadi et al., ; Watanabe et al., 2012; Morel et al., 2013).
Sumoylation
Protein sumoylation is characterized by the covalent modification of lysine residues on target proteins with small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO; SUMO-1, -2 and -3). It is an important modification to regulate protein functions and catalyzed by SUMO E1, E2 and E3 enzymes. It has been identified that both SUMO-1 and -2 are implicated in APP sumoylation with two sumoylated sites, Lys587 and Lys595 (Zhang and Sarge, 2008).
Sulfation
Tyrosine sulfation is a common post-translational modification of cell surface protein occurring in the late Golgi compartments, which is implicated in protein trafficking as well as proteolysis process. APP is a tyrosine sulfated protein with two potential sulfated residues, Tyr217 and Tyr262 (Weidemann et al., 1989). However, the exact sulfated sites and the function of APP sulfation have not been fully investigated.
Interplay of Post-Translational Modifications
Growing evidence indicates that the interplay of post-translational modifications, including phosphorylation and O-GlcNAcylation, phosphorylation and sumoylation, sumoylation and ubiquitination, and O-GlcNAcylation and sumoylation, is involved in complex physiological processes and the pathogenesis of multiple diseases (Zeidan and Hart, 2010; Hart et al., ; Ruan et al., 2013; Luo et al., 2014; Liebelt and Vertegaal, 2016). For example, alternative phosphorylation and O-GlcNAcylation of insulin receptors substrates is implicated in the risk of AD and diabetes (Jahangir et al., ). In addition, sumoylation of Tau protein promotes Tau phosphorylation and inhibits its ubiquitination, contributing to AD-associated Tau hyperphosphorylation and accumulation (Luo et al., 2014). As phosphorylation, O-GlcNAcylation, sumoylation and ubiquitination are all involved in APP modification, the interplay of APP modifications may affect APP processing and Aβ generation. For example, both phosphorylation and O-GlcNAcylation occur on serine and threonine residues, suggesting that these two types of post-translational modifications may have reciprocal effects at the same site contributing to the regulation of APP processing and Aβ generation (Weidemann et al., 1989; Chou et al., ; Cheng and Hart, ; Zeidan and Hart, 2010). However, the interplay of APP modifications has not been reported so far. Therefore, further investigation is essential to elucidate the interplay among APP modifications and its role in AD pathogenesis, providing a novel insight into AD treatment.
Modifications and Trafficking
Along the secretory pathway, APP is subject to post-translational modifications. On the other hand, APP modifications affect its sorting and trafficking (Table 1). Thus, APP modifications and trafficking are mutually regulated, contributing to the regulation of Aβ generation.
Table 1
| Modification | Trafficking | Affected cleavage | Aβ | Cells/Organs | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycosylation | |||||
| N-Glycosylation | COS-7 HEK293 | Pahlsson et al. (1992) | |||
| O-Glycosylation | PM | α-secretase | ↓ | PC12 CHO Hela | Weidemann et al. (1989) Perdivara et al. (2009) Jacobsen and Iverfeldt () Chun et al. (,) |
| Palmitoylation | |||||
| Cys186/187 | Lipid raft | β-secretase | ↑ | CHO PC12 Primary neuron | Bhattacharyya et al. () |
| Phosphorylation | |||||
| Ser655 | TGN | α-secretase | ↓ | PC12 Rat brains | Gandy et al. () Buxbaum et al. () Suzuki et al. (1992) Isohara et al. () |
| Thr668 | β-/γ-secretase | ↑ | SKSH-SY5Y H4 AD brains Mouse brains Primary neuron | Lee et al. (2003) Vingtdeux et al. (2005) Judge et al. () Mazzitelli et al. (2011) | |
| Tyr687 | ER/Golgi | α-/γ-secretase | ↓ | AD brains COS-7 HEK293 | Zambrano et al. (2001) Tarr et al. (2002) Lee et al. (2003) Rebelo et al. (2007) Takahashi et al. (2008) |
| Ubiquitination | |||||
| Lys651 | PM ↓ Lipid raft | α-secretase ↓β-secretase | ↓ ↓ | Primary neuron Hela HEK293 N2a Mouse brains | Watanabe et al. (2012) Morel et al. (2013) |
| Lys688 | Golgi | ↓ | PC12, H4 and HEK293 | Hiltunen et al. () El Ayadi et al. () | |
| Sumoylation | |||||
| Lys587/Lys595 | ↓ | Hela | Zhang and Sarge (2008) | ||
| Sulfation | PC12 | Weidemann et al. (1989) |
Amyloid precursor protein (APP) modifications and trafficking in amyloid β (Aβ) generation.
Glycosylation and Trafficking
N-Gly and O-Gly primarily occurs in the ER and Golgi/TGN, respectively. Both of them are essential for APP trafficking (Greenfield et al., ). The N-glycosylated APP (i.e., immature APP) is mainly located in the ER, while the mature APP generated through N-Gly, O-Gly and other modifications (e.g., sulfation, palmitoylation and phosphorylation) is mainly located in the TGN and at the PM (Tomita et al., 1998). Weidemann et al. (1989) reported that only the mature form of APP is detected on the cell surface, indicating that both N- and O-Gly are required for APP trafficking to the PM. A study by Chun et al. () has also shown that O-GlcNAcylation facilitates APP trafficking from the TGN to the PM, but inhibits the endocytosis of APP from the PM. Moreover, the sorting of APP from the Golgi apparatus to the cell surface is prevented due to the deletion of two N-glycosylated sites, Asn467 and Asn496 (Yazaki et al., 1996; McFarlane et al., 1999). Blockade of N-Gly can also inhibit the transport of APP to axonal synaptic membrane (McFarlane et al., 2000). Aforementioned evidence indicates that glycosylation plays a pivotal role in APP trafficking.
Phosphorylation and Trafficking
APP phosphorylation occurs along the secretory pathway and modulates its sorting and trafficking (Knops et al., 1993; Walter et al., 1997). For example, a APP mutant mimicking the constitutive phosphorylated Tyr687 retains APP in the ER and Golgi. In contrast, a dephosphomimetic APP mutant, the whose phosphorylation site Tyr687 was substituted by alanine, markedly reduces the expression of APP on the cell surface (Rebelo et al., 2007; Takahashi et al., 2008). Phosphorylation of Ser655 also potentiates APP sorting and trafficking from the endosome to the TGN, but attenuates its trafficking to the lysosomes (Vieira et al., 2010). Accordingly, the dephosphomimetic Ser655Ala mutant is preferred to be targeted for lysosomal degradation (Vieira et al., 2010).
Palmitoylation and Trafficking
APP palmitoylation is essential for APP trafficking and maturation. Double mutations at two palmitoylation sites, Cys186 and Cys187, result in the ER retention of APP and the blockade of APP maturation. Moreover, palmitoylated APP is highly enriched in lipid rafts (Bhattacharyya et al., ).
Ubiquitination and Trafficking
Ubiquitination of APP also affects its sorting and trafficking. Abolishing ubiquitination by substituting Lys649–651 with arginines inhibits the sorting of APP into endosomal intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) in both Hela cells and hippocampal neurons (Morel et al., 2013). In addition, K63-linked polyubiquitination of APP inhibits APP maturation and impairs APP trafficking by sequestering it in the early secretory pathway, such as the Golgi apparatus. The substitution of Lys688 with arginine dramatically reduces APP ubiquitination and Golgi sequestration (El Ayadi et al., ). Moreover, FBL2-induced APP ubiquitination inhibits APP endocytosis resulting in an increase of APP on the cell surface and a decrease of APP in lipid rafts (Watanabe et al., 2012).
Aberrant APP Modifications and Trafficking Dysregulate Aβ Generation in AD
Aberrant APP modifications and impairment of APP trafficking have been found in AD patients (Lee et al., 2003; Placido et al., 2014; Joshi and Wang, ), which plays an important role in the regulation of APP processing and Aβ generation (Table 1). Compared with the impairment of APP trafficking, the role of aberrant APP modifications in AD pathogenesis have been studied more extensively. Therefore, the dysregulation of trafficking is incorporated into the alteration of modifications.
Phosphorylation and Aβ Generation
Dysregulation of multiple kinases and phosphatases has been observed in AD brains, including GSK3, PKC, DYRK1A, PP1, PP2A (Wang et al., 1994; Pei et al., 1999; Ferrer et al., ; Braithwaite et al., ). The abnormality of SET and RCAN1, two phosphatase regulators, has also been found in AD and DS brains, which possibly contributes to the dysregulation of phosphatase activity (Tanimukai et al., 2005; Wu and Song, 2013; Wu et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015). As the substrate of above kinases and phosphatases, APP phosphorylation is impaired in AD, leading to the aberrant APP processing and Aβ generation.
The phosphorylation status of APP differentially affects APP processing and Aβ generation. Previous studies have suggested that reduction of Ser655 and ectodomain phosphorylation may stimulate Aβ generation in AD. For example, a deficiency of PKC in AD brains may reduce the phosphorylation of Ser655 and ectodomain (Wang et al., 1994), promoting Aβ generation (Buxbaum et al., ), while PKC-induced increased α-secretase cleavage in the TGN results in the reduction of β-cleavage and Aβ generation (Skovronsky et al., 2000). Moreover, PP1 and PP2A inhibitors have the same effect as PKC activation, such as increasing the secretion of soluble APP and reducing Aβ generation (Buxbaum et al., , ; Hung et al., ; Hung and Selkoe, ).
Increased Thr668 phosphorylation has been detected in AD and DS brains, which is resulted from the imbalance between kinases and phosphatases. For example, increased DYRK1A in DS and AD promotes Thr668 phosphorylation (Ferrer et al., ; Ryoo et al., 2008; Wegiel et al., 2008). A number of studies have identified that Thr668 phosphorylation increases Aβ generation both in vitro and in vivo (Lee et al., 2003; Vingtdeux et al., 2005; Judge et al., ; Mazzitelli et al., 2011). Although phosphorylation of Thr668 residue reduces APP secretion, it facilitates β- and γ-secretase cleavages in neurons (Ando et al., ; Lee et al., 2003; Vingtdeux et al., 2005; Ryoo et al., 2008; Mazzitelli et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2016; Triaca et al., 2016), leading to enhanced generation of C99 sand Aβ (Suzuki et al., 1994; Colombo et al., ; Mazzitelli et al., 2011). However, two studies have reported that Thr668 phosphorylation reduces Aβ generation by inhibiting γ-secretase cleavage (Feyt et al., ; Matsushima et al., 2012). It has to be noted that Thr668 phosphorylation inhibits γ-secretase cleavage in CHO cells, which is different from that in neurons Although Thr668E could mimic Thr668 phosphorylation, it may have differential effects on APP conformation change compared with phosphorylated Thr668. Moreover, kinase activation and inhibition may also directly modulate the activity of α-, β- and γ-secretases in addition to APP phosphorylation.
Phosphorylated Tyr682 and Tyr687 have been detected in AD brains but not in healthy controls (Zambrano et al., 2001; Tarr et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Rebelo et al., 2007). Compared with Tyr682, Tyr687 is the major tyrosine phosphorylation site (Takahashi et al., 2008). However, Tyr682 and Tyr687 phosphorylation cannot be detected in the cell lines overexpressing APP, suggesting that phosphorylation of these two residues may be exclusive in AD brains. Intriguingly, a couple of studies suggested that the phosphorylation of Tyr682 and Tyr687 negatively regulates APP processing and Aβ generation. For example, Trk A phosphorylates APP at Tyr682 and reduces the level of AICD (Tarr et al., 2002). In addition, APP mutant which mimics constitutive Tyr687 phosphorylation increases its half-life, but reduces Aβ generation in COS cells (Rebelo et al., 2007). However, a APP mutant with constitutive dephosphorylated Tyr687 (tyrosine replaced by alanine) also reduces both α- and γ-cleavages on APP (Takahashi et al., 2008). Since the cell type and conformation change of APP mutants may differently affect APP processing and Aβ generation, the role of Tyr682 and Tyr687 phosphorylation in Aβ generation remains elusive, which needs to be further investigated.
Glycosylation and Aβ Generation
Reduced O-GlcNAcylation is observed in AD brains (Liu et al., 2009). Recent studies showed that APP O-GlcNAcylation plays a key role in APP processing. Jacobsen and Iverfeldt () reported that increased O-GlcNAcylated APP by O-GlcNAcase (OGN) inhibitor or siRNA stimulated α-cleavage of APP and reduced Aβ generation. Consistently, Chun et al. () showed that the OGN inhibitor increased α-cleavage of APP and inhibited the β-cleavage of APP. These effects are due to the inhibition of APP endocytosis, which further increases the level of APP at PM (Sisodia, 1992). In addition, O-GlcNAcylation status of α-, β- and γ-secretases may also be implicated in OGN inhibitor-induced alteration of APP processing (Dias et al., ; Tarrant et al., 2012). Recently, Chun et al. () showed that the APP O-glycosylated site mutant (Thr576Ala) reduced APP expression on cell surface but increased its accumulation in the early endosome, leading to the increase of Aβ generation. It indicates that APP glycosylation does affect its processing and Aβ generation, which is associated with the alteration of APP trafficking.
Palmitoylation and Aβ Generation
Emerging evidence indicates that APP palmitoylation plays an important role in Aβ generation. Abolishing APP palmitoylation by site-direct mutagenesis inhibits APP cleavage by α- and β-secretase, resulting in the dramatic reduction of APP-CTFs. On the hand, APP palmitoylation preferentially targets APP into the lipid rafts where BACE1 is enriched, facilitating β-cleavage by BACE1 and Aβ generation (Bhattacharyya et al., ).
Ubiquitination and Aβ Generation
It has been demonstrated that APP ubiquitination inhibits APP processing and Aβ generation. HRD1-induced APP ubiquitination facilitates APP degradation, leading to the reduction of Aβ generation (Kaneko et al., 2010). In addition, blocking APP ubiquitination by the substitution of Lys649–651with arginines impairs APP sorting and enhances Aβ generation (Morel et al., 2013), while the ubiquitination of Lys651 is essential for FBL2-induced reduction of Aβ generation (Watanabe et al., 2012). Moreover, ubiquilin 1-mediated K63-linked polyubiquitination of APP delays its proteolytic processing, while reduced UBQLN1 increases Aβ generation (Hiltunen et al., ; El Ayadi et al., ).
Sumoylation and Aβ Generation
Two sumoylation sites of APP, Lys587 and Lys595, are close to the β-cleavage site, suggesting that sumoylation of APP may affect β-cleavage of APP and Aβ generation. Simultaneous overexpression of Ubc9 and SUMO-1 promotes APP sumoylation, which is associated with the reduction of Aβ generation. The result indicates that APP sumoylation may negatively regulate Aβ generation (Zhang and Sarge, 2008). In addition, SUMO3 reduces APP turnover rate, which may also contribute to the alteration of Aβ generation (Dorval et al., ).
Therapeutic Strategies for AD by Targeting Aβ
Currently, only four symptomatic drugs, rivastigmine, donepezil, galantamine and memantine, are available for AD treatment by regulating cholinergic and glutamatergic systems, which only leads to a temporary slowdown in the loss of cognitive function. However, these drugs neither delay the progression of dementia nor represent a cure (Godyń et al., ; Hung and Fu, ). As there is no effective treatment for AD, it is urgent to develop novel drugs for AD treatment. Targeting Aβ generation e is a major strategy for drug development in addition to accelerating Aβ clearance, anti-Tau pathology and anti-inflammation strategies (Godyń et al., ; Hung and Fu, ). Up to now, more than a hundred of BACE1 inhibitors and γ-secretase modulators have been developed for AD treatment by inhibiting the generation of Aβ. However, none of them is approved although a couple of inhibitors are still in the clinical trial (Godyń et al., ; Hung and Fu, ). The failure of many inhibitors in clinical trial suggests that several key issues need to be considered. First, as there are tons of known and unknown substrates of BACE1 and γ-secretase, the effects of the inhibitors on other substrates and associated processes should be considered. For example, the severe side effect of the first generation of γ-secretase inhibitor is caused by inhibiting Notch cleavage, a major substrate of γ-secretase (Song et al., 1999; Qing et al., 2008). Second, the inhibition effect on site preference of BACE1 and γ-secretase should be considered because only β-site and γ-site cleavages by BACE1 and γ-secretase contribute to Aβ generation but not β’-site and γ-site cleavages by BACE1 and γ-secretase, respectively (Deng et al., ; Zhang et al., 2013). In addition, the effect of the inhibitors on the co-residence of APP with BACE1 and γ-secretase should be considered, which is more important than the general inhibition of BACE1 and γ-secretase activity. Moreover, modulating APP modification might be a novel strategy to complement current strategies of inhibiting BACE1 and γ-secretase activity, which has two major advantages. First, it would have less or no effect on the processing of other BACE1 and γ-secretase substrates, resulting in less or no side effect. Second, it could reduce the co-residence of APP with BACE1 and γ-secretase by altering APP trafficking leading to the reduction of Aβ generation. Importantly, it may alter the cleavage site preference contributing to the reduction of Aβ generation as two recent studies reported that the APP mutants significantly affect cleavage site preference of BACE1 (Kimura et al., 2016; Zhang S. et al., 2017).
Conclusion
Post-translational modifications of APP occur along the constitutive secretory pathway, while it also affect APP trafficking (Figure 2 and Table 1), indicating that APP modifications and trafficking are mutually regulated (Figure 3). The modifications and trafficking of APP are precisely controlled to execute its physiological functions and maintain its normal processing. A growing body of evidence has shown that modifications and trafficking of APP have significant effects on APP processing and Aβ production. Aberrant APP modifications-induced trafficking and conformation changes may alter the cleavage preference of each secretase, resulting in the dysregulation of APP processing and Aβ generation (Figure 3). Moreover, alteration of APP trafficking has significant effects on its co-residence with different secretases, contributing to the alterations of APP processing and Aβ generation (Figure 3). Thus, the regulation of APP modifications and trafficking needs to be further investigated in order to develop novel therapeutic approaches for AD by modulating APP modification and trafficking.
Figure 3
Statements
Author contributions
XW, XZ, GL, YZ and YW wrote the manuscript. YW and WS formatted and revised the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Fund of China (81571334), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2016HM30, ZR2011HM023), Science and Technology Project of Higher education of Shandong Province (J10LF01), the Development of Medical Science and Technology Project of Shandong Province (2011HZ011), Postgraduate Education Innovation Program of Shandong Province (SDYY15012) and Research Project of Teaching Reform in Undergraduate Colleges and Universities in Shandong Province (2015M049). WS is the holder of the Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Alzheimer’s Disease, and YZ is the recipient of Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research/The Pacific Alzheimer Research Foundation Post-Doctoral Fellowship Award.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
ADI world alzheimer report. (2014). ADI World Alzheimer Report, 2014. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International (ADI). Available online at: https://www.alz.co.uk/research/WorldAlzheimerReport2014.pdf
2
AgostinhoP.PliássovaA.OliveiraC. R.CunhaR. A. (2015). Localization and trafficking of amyloid-β protein precursor and secretases: impact on Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis.45, 329–347. 10.3233/JAD-142730
3
AhmadM.TakinoT.MiyamoriH.YoshizakiT.FurukawaM.SatoH. (2006). Cleavage of amyloid-β precursor protein (APP) by membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases. J. Biochem.139, 517–526. 10.1093/jb/mvj054
4
Alzheimer’s Association. (2016). 2016 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement.12, 459–509. 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001
5
AndoK.IijimaK. I.ElliottJ. I.KirinoY.SuzukiT. (2001). Phosphorylation-dependent regulation of the interaction of amyloid precursor protein with Fe65 affects the production of β-amyloid. J. Biol. Chem.276, 40353–40361. 10.1074/jbc.M104059200
6
AplinA. E.GibbG. M.JacobsenJ. S.GalloJ. M.AndertonB. H. (1996). In vitro phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic domain of the amyloid precursor protein by glycogen synthase kinase-3β. J. Neurochem.67, 699–707. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.67020699.x
7
AzkonaG.LevannonD.GronerY.DierssenM. (2010). In vivo effects of APP are not exacerbated by BACE2 co-overexpression: behavioural characterization of a double transgenic mouse model. Amino Acids39, 1571–1580. 10.1007/s00726-010-0662-8
8
BacherM.DeusterO.AljabariB.EgenspergerR.NeffF.JessenF.et al. (2010). The role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Med.16, 116–121. 10.2119/molmed.2009.00123
9
BarangerK.BonnetA. E.GirardS. D.PaumierJ. M.García-GonzálezL.ElmanaaW.et al. (2017). MT5-MMP promotes Alzheimer’s pathogenesis in the frontal cortex of 5xFAD mice and APP trafficking in vitro. Front. Mol. Neurosci.9:163. 10.3389/fnmol.2016.00163
10
BarangerK.MarchalantY.BonnetA. E.CrouzinN.CarreteA.PaumierJ. M.et al. (2016). MT5-MMP is a new pro-amyloidogenic proteinase that promotes amyloid pathology and cognitive decline in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.73, 217–236. 10.1007/s00018-015-1992-1
11
BennettB. D.Babu-KhanS.LoeloffR.LouisJ. C.CurranE.CitronM.et al. (2000). Expression analysis of BACE2 in brain and peripheral tissues. J. Biol. Chem.275, 20647–20651. 10.1074/jbc.M002688200
12
BettensK.SleegersK.Van BroeckhovenC. (2013). Genetic insights in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol.12, 92–104. 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70259-4
13
BhattacharyyaR.BarrenC.KovacsD. M. (2013). Palmitoylation of amyloid precursor protein regulates amyloidogenic processing in lipid rafts. J. Neurosci.33, 11169–11183. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4704-12.2013
14
BolósM.HuY.YoungK. M.FoaL.SmallD. H. (2014). Neurogenin 2 mediates amyloid-β precursor protein-stimulated neurogenesis. J. Biol. Chem.289, 31253–31261. 10.1074/jbc.M114.581918
15
BraithwaiteS. P.StockJ. B.LombrosoP. J.NairnA. C. (2012). Protein phosphatases and Alzheimer’s disease. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci.106, 343–379. 10.1016/B978-0-12-396456-4.00012-2
16
BrouwersN.SleegersK.EngelborghsS.BogaertsV.SerneelsS.KamaliK.et al. (2006). Genetic risk and transcriptional variability of amyloid precursor protein in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain129, 2984–2991. 10.1093/brain/awl212
17
BusciglioJ.GabuzdaD. H.MatsudairaP.YanknerB. A. (1993). Generation of β-amyloid in the secretory pathway in neuronal and nonneuronal cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A90, 2092–2096. 10.1073/pnas.90.5.2092
18
BuxbaumJ. D.GandyS. E.CicchettiP.EhrlichM. E.CzernikA. J.FracassoR. P.et al. (1990). Processing of Alzheimer β/A4 amyloid precursor protein: modulation by agents that regulate protein phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A87, 6003–6006. 10.1073/pnas.87.15.6003
19
BuxbaumJ. D.KooE. H.GreengardP. (1993). Protein phosphorylation inhibits production of Alzheimer amyloid β/A4 peptide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A90, 9195–9198. 10.1073/pnas.90.19.9195
20
CampionD.DumanchinC.HannequinD.DuboisB.BelliardS.PuelM.et al. (1999). Early-onset autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease: prevalence, genetic heterogeneity, and mutation spectrum. Am. J. Hum. Genet.65, 664–670. 10.1086/302553
21
CapellA.BeherD.ProkopS.SteinerH.KaetherC.ShearmanM. S.et al. (2005). γ-secretase complex assembly within the early secretory pathway. J. Biol. Chem.280, 6471–6478. 10.1074/jbc.m409106200
22
ChenF.HasegawaH.Schmitt-UlmsG.KawaraiT.BohmC.KatayamaT.et al. (2006). TMP21 is a presenilin complex component that modulates γ-secretase but not epsilon-secretase activity. Nature440, 1208–1212. 10.1038/nature04667
23
ChengX.HartG. W. (2001). Alternative O-glycosylation/O-phosphorylation of serine-16 in murine estrogen receptor β: post-translational regulation of turnover and transactivation activity. J. Biol. Chem.276, 10570–10575. 10.1074/jbc.M010411200
24
ChouT. Y.HartG. W.DangC. V. (1995). c-Myc is glycosylated at threonine 58, a known phosphorylation site and a mutational hot spot in lymphomas. J. Biol. Chem.270, 18961–18965. 10.1074/jbc.270.32.18961
25
ChunY. S.KwonO. H.OhH. G.KimT. W.McIntireL. B.ParkM. K.et al. (2015a). Threonine 576 residue of amyloid-β precursor protein regulates its trafficking and processing. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.467, 955–960. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.10.037
26
ChunY. S.ParkY.OhH. G.KimT. W.YangH. O.ParkM. K.et al. (2015b). O-GlcNAcylation promotes non-amyloidogenic processing of amyloid-β protein precursor via inhibition of endocytosis from the plasma membrane. J. Alzheimers Dis.44, 261–275. 10.3233/JAD-140096
27
ChyungA. S.GreenbergB. D.CookD. G.DomsR. W.LeeV. M. (1997). Novel β-secretase cleavage of β-amyloid precursor protein in the endoplasmic reticulum/intermediate compartment of NT2N cells. J. Cell Biol.138, 671–680. 10.1083/jcb.138.3.671
28
ColomboA.BastoneA.PloiaC.SclipA.SalmonaM.ForloniG.et al. (2009). JNK regulates APP cleavage and degradation in a model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis.33, 518–525. 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.12.014
29
CookD. G.FormanM. S.SungJ. C.LeightS.KolsonD. L.IwatsuboT.et al. (1997). Alzheimer’s Aβ(1–42) is generated in the endoplasmic reticulum/intermediate compartment of NT2N cells. Nat. Med.3, 1021–1023. 10.1038/nm0997-1021
30
DengY.WangZ.WangR.ZhangX.ZhangS.WuY.et al. (2013). Amyloid-β protein (Aβ) Glu11 is the major β-secretase site of β-site amyloid-β precursor protein-cleaving enzyme 1(BACE1) and shifting the cleavage site to Aβ Asp1 contributes to Alzheimer pathogenesis. Eur. J. Neurosci.37, 1962–1969. 10.1111/ejn.12235
31
De StrooperB.AnnaertW.CupersP.SaftigP.CraessaertsK.MummJ. S.et al. (1999). A presenilin-1-dependent γ-secretase-like protease mediates release of Notch intracellular domain. Nature398, 518–522. 10.1038/19083
32
De StrooperB.SaftigP.CraessaertsK.VandersticheleH.GuhdeG.AnnaertW.et al. (1998). Deficiency of presenilin-1 inhibits the normal cleavage of amyloid precursor protein. Nature391, 387–390. 10.1038/34910
33
DiasW. B.CheungW. D.WangZ.HartG. W. (2009). Regulation of calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase IV by O-GlcNAc modification. J. Biol. Chem.284, 21327–21337. 10.1074/jbc.M109.007310
34
DongZ.HanH.LiH.BaiY.WangW.TuM.et al. (2015). Long-term potentiation decay and memory loss are mediated by AMPAR endocytosis. J. Clin. Invest.125, 234–247. 10.1172/JCI77888
35
DorvalV.MazzellaM. J.MathewsP. M.HayR. T.FraserP. E. (2007). Modulation of Aβ generation by small ubiquitin-like modifiers does not require conjugation to target proteins. Biochem. J.404, 309–316. 10.1042/bj20061451
36
El AyadiA.StierenE. S.BarralJ. M.BoehningD. (2012). Ubiquilin-1 regulates amyloid precursor protein maturation and degradation by stimulating K63-linked polyubiquitination of lysine 688. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A109, 13416–13421. 10.1073/pnas.1206786109
37
FanutzaT.Del PreteD.FordM. J.CastilloP. E.D’AdamioL. (2015). APP and APLP2 interact with the synaptic release machinery and facilitate transmitter release at hippocampal synapses. Elife4:e09743. 10.7554/eLife.09743
38
FerrerI.BarrachinaM.PuigB.Martínez de LagranM.MartíE.AvilaJ.et al. (2005). Constitutive Dyrk1A is abnormally expressed in Alzheimer disease, Down syndrome, Pick disease, and related transgenic models. Neurobiol. Dis.20, 392–400. 10.1016/j.nbd.2005.03.020
39
FeytC.PierrotN.TasiauxB.Van HeesJ.Kienlen-CampardP.CourtoyP. J.et al. (2007). Phosphorylation of APP695 at Thr668 decreases γ-cleavage and extracellular Aβ. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.357, 1004–1010. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.04.036
40
GandyS.CzernikA. J.GreengardP. (1988). Phosphorylation of Alzheimer disease amyloid precursor peptide by protein kinase C and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A85, 6218–6221. 10.1073/pnas.85.16.6218
41
GlennerG. G.WongC. W. (1984). Alzheimer’s disease: initial report of the purification and characterization of a novel cerebrovascular amyloid protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.120, 885–890. 10.1016/s0006-291x(84)80190-4
42
GodyńJ.JończykJ.PanekD.MalawskaB. (2016). Therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer’s disease in clinical trials. Pharmacol. Rep.68, 127–138. 10.1016/j.pharep.2015.07.006
43
GoldeT. E.EstusS.YounkinL. H.SelkoeD. J.YounkinS. G. (1992). Processing of the amyloid protein precursor to potentially amyloidogenic derivatives. Science255, 728–730. 10.1126/science.1738847
44
GoldgaberD.LermanM. I.McBrideO. W.SaffiottiU.GajdusekD. C. (1987). Characterization and chromosomal localization of a cDNA encoding brain amyloid of Alzheimer’s disease. Science235, 877–880. 10.1126/science.3810169
45
GreenfieldJ. P.TsaiJ.GourasG. K.HaiB.ThinakaranG.CheclerF.et al. (1999). Endoplasmic reticulum and trans-Golgi network generate distinct populations of Alzheimer β-amyloid peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A96, 742–747. 10.1073/pnas.96.2.742
46
GriffithL. S.MathesM.SchmitzB. (1995). β-amyloid precursor protein is modified with O-linked N-acetylglucosamine. J. Neurosci. Res.41, 270–278. 10.1002/jnr.490410214
47
HaassC.KooE. H.MellonA.HungA. Y.SelkoeD. J. (1992). Targeting of cell-surface β-amyloid precursor protein to lysosomes: alternative processing into amyloid-bearing fragments. Nature357, 500–503. 10.1038/357500a0
48
HaassC.LemereC. A.CapellA.CitronM.SeubertP.SchenkD.et al. (1995). The Swedish mutation causes early-onset Alzheimer’s disease by β-secretase cleavage within the secretory pathway. Nat. Med.1, 1291–1296. 10.1038/nm1295-1291
49
HalimA.BrinkmalmG.RüetschiU.Westman-BrinkmalmA.PorteliusE.ZetterbergH.et al. (2011). Site-specific characterization of threonine, serine, and tyrosine glycosylations of amyloid precursor protein/amyloid β-peptides in human cerebrospinal fluid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A108, 11848–11853. 10.1073/pnas.1102664108
50
HardyJ. A.HigginsG. A. (1992). Alzheimer’s disease: the amyloid cascade hypothesis. Science256, 184–185. 10.1126/science.1566067
51
HartG. W.SlawsonC.Ramirez-CorreaG.LagerlofO. (2011). Cross talk between O-GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation: roles in signaling, transcription and chronic disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem.80, 825–858. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060608-102511
52
HartmannT.BiegerS. C.BruhlB.TienariP. J.IdaN.AllsopD.et al. (1997). Distinct sites of intracellular production for Alzheimer’s disease A β40/42 amyloid peptides. Nat. Med.3, 1016–1020. 10.1038/nm0997-1016
53
HigashiS.MiyazakiK. (2003). Novel processing of β-amyloid precursor protein catalyzed by membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase releases a fragment lacking the inhibitor domain against gelatinase A. Biochemistry42, 6514–6526. 10.1021/bi020643m
54
HiltunenM.LuA.ThomasA. V.RomanoD. M.KimM.JonesP. B.et al. (2006). Ubiquilin 1 modulates amyloid precursor protein trafficking and Aβ secretion. J. Biol. Chem.281, 32240–32253. 10.1074/jbc.M603106200
55
HortJ.O’BrienJ. T.GainottiG.PirttilaT.PopescuB. O.RektorovaI.et al. (2010). EFNS guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Neurol.17, 1236–1248. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03040.x
56
HungS. Y.FuW. M. (2017). Drug candidates in clinical trials for Alzheimer’s disease. J. Biomed. Sci.24:47. 10.1186/s12929-017-0355-7
57
HungA. Y.HaassC.NitschR. M.QiuW. Q.CitronM.WurtmanR. J.et al. (1993). Activation of protein kinase C inhibits cellular production of the amyloid β-protein. J. Biol. Chem.268, 22959–22962.
58
HungA. Y.SelkoeD. J. (1994). Selective ectodomain phosphorylation and regulated cleavage of β-amyloid precursor protein. EMBO J.13, 534–542.
59
HuseJ. T.LiuK.PijakD. S.CarlinD.LeeV. M.DomsR. W. (2002). β-secretase processing in the trans-Golgi network preferentially generates truncated amyloid species that accumulate in Alzheimer’s disease brain. J. Biol. Chem.277, 16278–16284. 10.1074/jbc.M111141200
60
IijimaK.AndoK.TakedaS.SatohY.SekiT.ItoharaS.et al. (2000). Neuron-specific phosphorylation of Alzheimer’s β-amyloid precursor protein by cyclin-dependent kinase 5. J. Neurochem.75, 1085–1091. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0751085.x
61
IsoharaT.HoriuchiA.WatanabeT.AndoK.CzernikA. J.UnoI.et al. (1999). Phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic domain of Alzheimer’s β-amyloid precursor protein at Ser655 by a novel protein kinase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.258, 300–305. 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0637
62
JacobsenK. T.IverfeldtK. (2011). O-GlcNAcylation increases non-amyloidogenic processing of the amyloid-β precursor protein (APP). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.404, 882–886. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.12.080
63
JahangirZ.AhmadW.ShabbiriK. (2014). Alternate phosphorylation/O-GlcNAc modification on human insulin IRSs: a road towards impaired insulin signaling in Alzheimer and diabetes. Adv. Bioinformatics2014:324753. 10.1155/2014/324753
64
JoshiG.WangY. (2015). Golgi defects enhance APP amyloidogenic processing in Alzheimer’s disease. Bioessays37, 240–247. 10.1002/bies.201400116
65
JudgeM.HornbeckL.PotterH.PadmanabhanJ. (2011). Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of amyloid precursor protein at threonine 668 leads to its altered processing and association with centrosomes. Mol. Neurodegener.6:80. 10.1186/1750-1326-6-80
66
KaetherC.SchmittS.WillemM.HaassC. (2006). Amyloid precursor protein and Notch intracellular domains are generated after transport of their precursors to the cell surface. Traffic7, 408–415. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00396.x
67
KanatsuK.MorohashiY.SuzukiM.KurodaH.WatanabeT.TomitaT.et al. (2014). Decreased CALM expression reduces Aβ42 to total Aβ ratio through clathrin-mediated endocytosis of γ-secretase. Nat. Commun.5:3386. 10.1038/ncomms4386
68
KanekoM.KoikeH.SaitoR.KitamuraY.OkumaY.NomuraY. (2010). Loss of HRD1-mediated protein degradation causes amyloid precursor protein accumulation and amyloid-β generation. J. Neurosci.30, 3924–3932. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2422-09.2010
69
KangJ.LemaireH. G.UnterbeckA.SalbaumJ. M.MastersC. L.GrzeschikK. H.et al. (1987). The precursor of Alzheimer’s disease amyloid A4 protein resembles a cell-surface receptor. Nature325, 733–736. 10.1038/325733a0
70
KangJ.Müller-HillB. (1990). Differential splicing of Alzheimer’s disease amyloid A4 precursor RNA in rat tissues: PreA4695 mRNA is predominantly produced in rat and human brain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.166, 1192–1200. 10.1016/0006-291x(90)90992-v
71
KangY.ZhangY.FengZ.LiuM.LiY.YangH.et al. (2017). Nutritional deficiency in early life facilitates aging-associated cognitive decline. Curr. Alzheimer Res.14, 841–849. 10.2174/1567205014666170425112331
72
KarranE.MerckenM.De StrooperB. (2011). The amyloid cascade hypothesis for Alzheimer’s disease: an appraisal for the development of therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov.10, 698–712. 10.1038/nrd3505
73
KasugaK.ShimohataT.NishimuraA.ShigaA.MizuguchiT.TokunagaJ.et al. (2009). Identification of independent APP locus duplication in Japanese patients with early-onset alzheimer disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry80, 1050–1052. 10.1136/jnnp.2008.161703
74
KimB. M.YouM.-H.ChenC.-H.SuhJ.TanziR. E.Ho LeeT. (2016). Inhibition of death-associated protein kinase 1 attenuates the phosphorylation and amyloidogenic processing of amyloid precursor protein. Hum. Mol. Genet.25, 2498–2513. 10.1093/hmg/ddw114
75
KimuraA.HataS.SuzukiT. (2016). Alternative selection of β-site APP-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) cleavage sites in amyloid β-protein precursor (APP) harboring protective and pathogenic mutations within the Aβ sequence. J. Biol. Chem.291, 24041–24053. 10.1074/jbc.M116.744722
76
KnopsJ.GandyS.GreengardP.LieberburgI.SinhaS. (1993). Serine phosphorylation of the secreted extracellular domain of APP. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.197, 380–385. 10.1006/bbrc.1993.2490
77
KooE. H.SquazzoS. L. (1994). Evidence that production and release of amyloid β-protein involves the endocytic pathway. J. Biol. Chem.269, 17386–17389.
78
KooE. H.SquazzoS. L.SelkoeD. J.KooC. H. (1996). Trafficking of cell-surface amyloid β-protein precursor. I. Secretion, endocytosis and recycling as detected by labeled monoclonal antibody. J. Cell Sci.109, 991–998.
79
KorvatskaO.LeverenzJ. B.JayadevS.McMillanP.KurtzI.GuoX.et al. (2015). R47H variant of TREM2 associated with Alzheimer disease in a large late-onset family: clinical, genetic, and neuropathological study. JAMA Neurol.72, 920–927. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0979
80
LambB. T.SisodiaS. S.LawlerA. M.SluntH. H.KittC. A.KearnsW. G.et al. (1993). Introduction and expression of the 400 kilobase amyloid precursor protein gene in transgenic mice. Nat. Genet.5, 22–30. 10.1038/ng0993-22
81
LeeM. S.KaoS. C.LemereC. A.XiaW.TsengH. C.ZhouY.et al. (2003). APP processing is regulated by cytoplasmic phosphorylation. J. Cell Biol.163, 83–95. 10.1083/jcb.200301115
82
Levy-LahadE.WascoW.PoorkajP.RomanoD. M.OshimaJ.PettingellW. H.et al. (1995a). Candidate gene for the chromosome 1 familial Alzheimer’s disease locus. Science269, 973–977. 10.1126/science.7638622
83
Levy-LahadE.WijsmanE. M.NemensE.AndersonL.GoddardK. A.WeberJ. L.et al. (1995b). A familial Alzheimer’s disease locus on chromosome 1. Science269, 970–973. 10.1126/science.7638621
84
LiJ.MaJ.PotterH. (1995). Identification and expression analysis of a potential familial Alzheimer disease gene on chromosome 1 related to AD3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A92, 12180–12184. 10.1073/pnas.92.26.12180
85
LiebeltF.VertegaalA. C. (2016). Ubiquitin-dependent and independent roles of SUMO in proteostasis. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.311, C284–C296. 10.1152/ajpcell.00091.2016
86
LiuK.DomsR. W.LeeV. M. (2002). Glu11 site cleavage and N-terminally truncated Aβ production upon BACE overexpression. Biochemistry41, 3128–3136. 10.1021/bi015800g
87
LiuF.ShiJ.TanimukaiH.GuJ.Grundke-IqbalI.IqbalK.et al. (2009). Reduced O-GlcNAcylation links lower brain glucose metabolism and tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain132, 1820–1832. 10.1093/brain/awp099
88
LiuX.WangZ.WuY.WangJ.SongW. (2013). BACE2 degradation mediated by the macroautophagy-lysosome pathway. Eur. J. Neurosci.37, 1970–1977. 10.1111/ejn.12204
89
LongJ. M.RayB.LahiriD. K. (2012). MicroRNA-153 physiologically inhibits expression of amyloid-β precursor protein in cultured human fetal brain cells and is dysregulated in a subset of Alzheimer disease patients. J. Biol. Chem.287, 31298–31310. 10.1074/jbc.M112.366336
90
LuoH. B.XiaY. Y.ShuX. J.LiuZ. C.FengY.LiuX. H.et al. (2014). SUMOylation at K340 inhibits tau degradation through deregulating its phosphorylation and ubiquitination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A111, 16586–16591. 10.1073/pnas.1417548111
91
LyP. T.WuY.ZouH.WangR.ZhouW.KinoshitaA.et al. (2013). Inhibition of GSK3β-mediated BACE1 expression reduces Alzheimer-associated phenotypes. J. Clin. Invest.123, 224–235. 10.1172/JCI64516
92
MalteseW. A.WilsonS.TanY.SuomensaariS.SinhaS.BarbourR.et al. (2001). Retention of the Alzheimer’s amyloid precursor fragment C99 in the endoplasmic reticulum prevents formation of amyloid β-peptide. J. Biol. Chem.276, 20267–20279. 10.1074/jbc.M007238200
93
MarcinkiewiczM.SeidahN. G. (2000). Coordinated expression of β-amyloid precursor protein and the putative β-secretase BACE and α-secretase ADAM10 in mouse and human brain. J. Neurochem.75, 2133–2143. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0752133.x
94
MatsushimaT.SaitoY.ElliottJ. I.Iijima-AndoK.NishimuraM.KimuraN.et al. (2012). Membrane-microdomain localization of amyloid β-precursor protein (APP) C-terminal fragments is regulated by phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic Thr668 residue. J. Biol. Chem.287, 19715–19724. 10.1074/jbc.M111.334847
95
MazzitelliS.XuP.FerrerI.DavisR. J.TournierC. (2011). The loss of c-Jun N-terminal protein kinase activity prevents the amyloidogenic cleavage of amyloid precursor protein and the formation of amyloid plaques in vivo. J. Neurosci.31, 16969–16976. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4491-11.2011
96
McFarlaneI.BreenK. C.Di GiamberardinoL.MoyaK. L. (2000). Inhibition of N-glycan processing alters axonal transport of synaptic glycoproteins in vivo. Neuroreport11, 1543–1547. 10.1097/00001756-200005150-00036
97
McFarlaneI.GeorgopoulouN.CoughlanC. M.GillianA. M.BreenK. C. (1999). The role of the protein glycosylation state in the control of cellular transport of the amyloid β precursor protein. Neuroscience90, 15–25. 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00361-3
98
McKhannG. M.KnopmanD. S.ChertkowH.HymanB. T.JackC. R.Jr.KawasC. H.et al. (2011). The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the national institute on aging-Alzheimer’s association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement.7, 263–269. 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.04.001
99
MiloschN.TanriöverG.KunduA.RamiA.FrancoisJ. C.BaumkötterF.et al. (2014). Holo-APP and G-protein-mediated signaling are required for sAPPα-induced activation of the Akt survival pathway. Cell Death Dis.5:e1391. 10.1038/cddis.2014.352
100
MorelE.ChamounZ.LasieckaZ. M.ChanR. B.WilliamsonR. L.VetanovetzC.et al. (2013). Phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate regulates sorting and processing of amyloid precursor protein through the endosomal system. Nat. Commun.4:2250. 10.1038/ncomms3250
101
MullanM.HouldenH.WindelspechtM.FidaniL.LombardiC.DiazP.et al. (1992). A locus for familial early-onset Alzheimer’s disease on the long arm of chromosome 14, proximal to the α 1-antichymotrypsin gene. Nat. Genet.2, 340–342. 10.1038/ng1292-340
102
MungerJ. S.HaassC.LemereC. A.ShiG. P.WongW. S.TeplowD. B.et al. (1995). Lysosomal processing of amyloid precursor protein to A beta peptides: a distinct role for cathepsin S. Biochem. J.311, 299–305. 10.1042/bj3110299
103
MuresanV.Ladescu MuresanZ. (2015). Amyloid-β precursor protein: multiple fragments, numerous transport routes and mechanisms. Exp. Cell Res.334, 45–53. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.12.014
104
MuresanV.MuresanZ. (2012). A persistent stress response to impeded axonal transport leads to accumulation of amyloid-β in the endoplasmic reticulum and is a probable cause of sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Neurodegener. Dis.10, 60–63. 10.1159/000332815
105
NeveR. L.FinchE. A.DawesL. R. (1988). Expression of the Alzheimer amyloid precursor gene transcripts in the human brain. Neuron1, 669–677. 10.1016/0896-6273(88)90166-3
106
OishiM.NairnA. C.CzernikA. J.LimG. S.IsoharaT.GandyS. E.et al. (1997). The cytoplasmic domain of Alzheimer’s amyloid precursor protein is phosphorylated at Thr654, Ser655, and Thr668 in adult rat brain and cultured cells. Mol. Med.3, 111–123.
107
OliveiraJ. M.HenriquesA. G.MartinsF.RebeloS.da Cruz e SilvaO. A. (2015). Amyloid-β modulates both AβPP and tau phosphorylation. J. Alzheimers Dis.45, 495–507. 10.3233/JAD-142664
108
PahlssonP.Shakin-EshlemanS. H.SpitalnikS. L. (1992). N-linked glycosylation of β-amyloid precursor protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.189, 1667–1673. 10.1016/0006-291X(92)90269-Q
109
PeiJ. J.BraakE.BraakH.Grundke-IqbalI.IqbalK.WinbladB.et al. (1999). Distribution of active glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β) in brains staged for Alzheimer disease neurofibrillary changes. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.58, 1010–1019. 10.1097/00005072-199909000-00011
110
PerdivaraI.PetrovichR.AllinquantB.DeterdingL. J.TomerK. B.PrzybylskiM. (2009). Elucidation of O-glycosylation structures of the β-amyloid precursor protein by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry using electron transfer dissociation and collision induced dissociation. J. Proteome Res.8, 631–642. 10.1021/pr800758g
111
PlacidoA. I.PereiraC. M.DuarteA. I.CandeiasE.CorreiaS. C.SantosR. X.et al. (2014). The role of endoplasmic reticulum in amyloid precursor protein processing and trafficking: implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1842, 1444–1453. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.05.003
112
QingH.HeG.LyP. T.FoxC. J.StaufenbielM.CaiF.et al. (2008). Valproic acid inhibits Aβ production, neuritic plaque formation, and behavioral deficits in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. J. Exp. Med.205, 2781–2789. 10.1084/jem.20081588
113
QiuC.KivipeltoM.von StraussE. (2009). Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease: occurrence, determinants, and strategies toward intervention. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci.11, 111–128.
114
RebeloS.VieiraS. I.EsselmannH.WiltfangJ.da Cruz e SilvaE. F.da Cruz e SilvaO. A. (2007). Tyrosine 687 phosphorylated Alzheimer’s amyloid precursor protein is retained intracellularly and exhibits a decreased turnover rate. Neurodegener. Dis.4, 78–87. 10.1159/000101831
115
RobakisN. K.RamakrishnaN.WolfeG.WisniewskiH. M. (1987). Molecular cloning and characterization of a cDNA encoding the cerebrovascular and the neuritic plaque amyloid peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A84, 4190–4194. 10.1073/pnas.84.12.4190
116
RogaevE. I.SherringtonR.RogaevaE. A.LevesqueG.IkedaM.LiangY.et al. (1995). Familial Alzheimer’s disease in kindreds with missense mutations in a gene on chromosome 1 related to the Alzheimer’s disease type 3 gene. Nature376, 775–778. 10.1038/376775a0
117
Rovelet-LecruxA.FrebourgT.TuominenH.MajamaaK.CampionD.RemesA. M. (2007). APP locus duplication in a Finnish family with dementia and intracerebral haemorrhage. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry78, 1158–1159. 10.1136/jnnp.2006.113514
118
Rovelet-LecruxA.HannequinD.RauxG.Le MeurN.LaquerrièreA.VitalA.et al. (2006). APP locus duplication causes autosomal dominant early-onset alzheimer disease with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Nat. Genet.38, 24–26. 10.1038/ng1718
119
RuanH. B.NieY.YangX. (2013). Regulation of protein degradation by O-GlcNAcylation: crosstalk with ubiquitination. Mol. Cell Proteomics12, 3489–3497. 10.1074/mcp.R113.029751
120
RyooS. R.ChoH. J.LeeH. W.JeongH. K.RadnaabazarC.KimY. S.et al. (2008). Dual-specificity tyrosine(Y)-phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A-mediated phosphorylation of amyloid precursor protein: evidence for a functional link between Down syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurochem.104, 1333–1344. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05075.x
121
RyooS. R.JeongH. K.RadnaabazarC.YooJ. J.ChoH. J.LeeH. W.et al. (2007). DYRK1A-mediated hyperphosphorylation of Tau. A functional link between Down syndrome and Alzheimer disease. J. Biol. Chem.282, 34850–34857. 10.1074/jbc.M707358200
122
SchellenbergG. D.BirdT. D.WijsmanE. M.OrrH. T.AndersonL.NemensE.et al. (1992). Genetic linkage evidence for a familial Alzheimer’s disease locus on chromosome 14. Science258, 668–671. 10.1126/science.1411576
123
Segal-GidanF.CherryD.JonesR.WilliamsB.HewettL.ChodoshJ. (2011). Alzheimer’s disease management guideline: update 2008. Alzheimers Dement.7, e51–e59. 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.07.005
124
SherringtonR.RogaevE. I.LiangY.RogaevaE. A.LevesqueG.IkedaM.et al. (1995). Cloning of a gene bearing missense mutations in early-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease. Nature375, 754–760. 10.1038/375754a0
125
SisodiaS. S. (1992). β-amyloid precursor protein cleavage by a membrane-bound protease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A89, 6075–6079. 10.1073/pnas.89.13.6075
126
SisodiaS. S.KooE. H.HoffmanP. N.PerryG.PriceD. L. (1993). Identification and transport of full-length amyloid precursor proteins in rat peripheral nervous system. J. Neurosci.13, 3136–3142.
127
SkovronskyD. M.MooreD. B.MillaM. E.DomsR. W.LeeV. M. (2000). Protein kinase C-dependent α-secretase competes with β-secretase for cleavage of amyloid-β precursor protein in the trans-golgi network. J. Biol. Chem.275, 2568–2575. 10.1074/jbc.275.4.2568
128
SleegersK.BrouwersN.GijselinckI.TheunsJ.GoossensD.WautersJ.et al. (2006). APP duplication is sufficient to cause early onset alzheimer’s dementia with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Brain129, 2977–2983. 10.1093/brain/awl203
129
SongW.NadeauP.YuanM.YangX.ShenJ.YanknerB. A. (1999). Proteolytic release and nuclear translocation of Notch-1 are induced by presenilin-1 and impaired by pathogenic presenilin-1 mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A96, 6959–6963. 10.1073/pnas.96.12.6959
130
SongW. J.SongE. A.JungM. S.ChoiS. H.BaikH. H.JinB. K.et al. (2015). Phosphorylation and inactivation of glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) by dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (Dyrk1A). J. Biol. Chem.290, 2321–2333. 10.1074/jbc.M114.594952
131
StandenC. L.BrownleesJ.GriersonA. J.KesavapanyS.LauK. F.McLoughlinD. M.et al. (2001). Phosphorylation of thr(668) in the cytoplasmic domain of the Alzheimer’s disease amyloid precursor protein by stress-activated protein kinase 1b (Jun N-terminal kinase-3). J. Neurochem.76, 316–320. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00102.x
132
StephensD. J.AustenB. M. (1996). Metabolites of the β-amyloid precursor protein generated by β-secretase localise to the trans-Golgi network and late endosome in 293 cells. J. Neurosci. Res.46, 211–225. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19961015)46:2<211::AID-JNR9>3.0.CO;2-K
133
St. George-HyslopP.HainesJ.RogaevE.MortillaM.VaulaG.Pericak-VanceM.et al. (1992). Genetic evidence for a novel familial Alzheimer’s disease locus on chromosome 14. Nat. Genet.2, 330–334. 10.1038/ng1292-330
134
St. George-HyslopP. H.TanziR. E.PolinskyR. J.HainesJ. L.NeeL.WatkinsP. C.et al. (1987). The genetic defect causing familial Alzheimer’s disease maps on chromosome 21. Science235, 885–890. 10.1126/science.2880399
135
SunX.Bromley-BritsK.SongW. (2012). Regulation of β-site APP-cleaving enzyme 1 gene expression and its role in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurochem.120, 62–70. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07515.x
136
SunX.HeG.QingH.ZhouW.DobieF.CaiF.et al. (2006a). Hypoxia facilitates Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis by up-regulating BACE1 gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A103, 18727–18732. 10.1073/pnas.0606298103
137
SunX.HeG.SongW. (2006b). BACE2, as a novel APP theta-secretase, is not responsible for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease in Down syndrome. FASEB J.20, 1369–1376. 10.1096/fj.05-5632com
138
SunX.WangY.QingH.ChristensenM. A.LiuY.ZhouW.et al. (2005). Distinct transcriptional regulation and function of the human BACE2 and BACE1 genes. FASEB J.19, 739–749. 10.1096/fj.04-3426com
139
SunX.WuY.ChenB.ZhangZ.ZhouW.TongY.et al. (2011). Regulator of calcineurin 1 (RCAN1) facilitates neuronal apoptosis through caspase-3 activation. J. Biol. Chem.286, 9049–9062. 10.1074/jbc.m110.177519
140
SunX.WuY.HerculanoB.SongW. (2014). RCAN1 overexpression exacerbates calcium overloading-induced neuronal apoptosis. PLoS One9:e95471. 10.1371/journal.pone.0095471
141
SuzukiT.NairnA. C.GandyS. E.GreengardP. (1992). Phosphorylation of Alzheimer amyloid precursor protein by protein kinase C. Neuroscience48, 755–761. 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90264-3
142
SuzukiT.OishiM.MarshakD. R.CzernikA. J.NairnA. C.GreengardP. (1994). Cell cycle-dependent regulation of the phosphorylation and metabolism of the Alzheimer amyloid precursor protein. EMBO J.13, 1114–1122.
143
TakahashiK.NiidomeT.AkaikeA.KiharaT.SugimotoH. (2008). Phosphorylation of amyloid precursor protein (APP) at Tyr687 regulates APP processing by α- and γ-secretase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.377, 544–549. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.10.013
144
TakasugiN.TomitaT.HayashiI.TsuruokaM.NiimuraM.TakahashiY.et al. (2003). The role of presenilin cofactors in the γ-secretase complex. Nature422, 438–441. 10.1038/nature01506
145
TanimukaiH.Grundke-IqbalI.IqbalK. (2005). Up-regulation of inhibitors of protein phosphatase-2A in Alzheimer’s disease. Am. J. Pathol.166, 1761–1771. 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)62486-8
146
TanziR. E.GusellaJ. F.WatkinsP. C.BrunsG. A.St. George-HyslopP.Van KeurenM. L.et al. (1987). Amyloid β protein gene: cDNA, mRNA distribution, and genetic linkage near the Alzheimer locus. Science235, 880–884. 10.1126/science.2949367
147
TanziR. E.McClatcheyA. I.LampertiE. D.Villa-KomaroffL.GusellaJ. F.NeveR. L. (1988). Protease inhibitor domain encoded by an amyloid protein precursor mRNA associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nature331, 528–530. 10.1038/331528a0
148
TarrP. E.ContursiC.RoncaratiR.NovielloC.GhersiE.ScheinfeldM. H.et al. (2002). Evidence for a role of the nerve growth factor receptor TrkA in tyrosine phosphorylation and processing of β-APP. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.295, 324–329. 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)00678-2
149
TarrantM. K.RhoH. S.XieZ.JiangY. L.GrossC.CulhaneJ. C.et al. (2012). Regulation of CK2 by phosphorylation and O-GlcNAcylation revealed by semisynthesis. Nat. Chem. Biol.8, 262–269. 10.1038/nchembio.771
150
TohW. H.GleesonP. A. (2016). Dysregulation of intracellular trafficking and endosomal sorting in Alzheimer’s disease: controversies and unanswered questions. Biochem. J.473, 1977–1993. 10.1042/bcj20160147
151
TomitaS.KirinoY.SuzukiT. (1998). Cleavage of Alzheimer’s amyloid precursor protein (APP) by secretases occurs after O-glycosylation of APP in the protein secretory pathway. Identification of intracellular compartments in which APP cleavage occurs without using toxic agents that interfere with protein metabolism. J. Biol. Chem.273, 6277–6284. 10.1074/jbc.273.11.6277
152
TriacaV.SposatoV.BolascoG.CiottiM. T.PelicciP.BruniA. C.et al. (2016). NGF controls APP cleavage by downregulating APP phosphorylation at Thr668: relevance for Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Cell15, 661–672. 10.1111/acel.12473
153
VassarR.BennettB. D.Babu-KhanS.KahnS.MendiazE. A.DenisP.et al. (1999). β-secretase cleavage of Alzheimer’s amyloid precursor protein by the transmembrane aspartic protease BACE. Science286, 735–741. 10.1126/science.286.5440.735
154
VieiraS. I.RebeloS.EsselmannH.WiltfangJ.LahJ.LaneR.et al. (2010). Retrieval of the Alzheimer’s amyloid precursor protein from the endosome to the TGN is S655 phosphorylation state-dependent and retromer-mediated. Mol. Neurodegener.5:40. 10.1186/1750-1326-5-40
155
VingtdeuxV.HamdaneM.GompelM.BégardS.DrobecqH.GhestemA.et al. (2005). Phosphorylation of amyloid precursor carboxy-terminal fragments enhances their processing by a γ-secretase-dependent mechanism. Neurobiol. Dis.20, 625–637. 10.1016/j.nbd.2005.05.004
156
WalshD. M.SelkoeD. J. (2007). Aβ oligomers - a decade of discovery. J. Neurochem.101, 1172–1184. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04426.x
157
WalterJ.CapellA.GrunbergJ.PesoldB.SchindzielorzA.PriorR.et al. (1996). The Alzheimer’s disease-associated presenilins are differentially phosphorylated proteins located predominantly within the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Med.2, 673–691.
158
WalterJ.CapellA.HungA. Y.LangenH.SchnölzerM.ThinakaranG.et al. (1997). Ectodomain phosphorylation of β-amyloid precursor protein at two distinct cellular locations. J. Biol. Chem.272, 1896–1903. 10.1074/jbc.272.3.1896
159
WangT.LiuH.WangY.LiuC.SunX. (2014). RCAN1 increases Aβ generation by promoting N-glycosylation via Oligosaccharyltransferase. Curr. Alzheimer Res.11, 332–339. 10.2174/1567205011666140331225855
160
WangH.-Y.PisanoM. R.FriedmanE. (1994). Attenuated protein kinase C activity and translocation in Alzheimer’s disease brain. Neurobiol. Aging15, 293–298. 10.1016/0197-4580(94)90023-x
161
WatanabeT.HikichiY.WilluweitA.ShintaniY.HoriguchiT. (2012). FBL2 regulates amyloid precursor protein (APP) metabolism by promoting ubiquitination-dependent APP degradation and inhibition of APP endocytosis. J. Neurosci.32, 3352–3365. 10.1523/jneurosci.5659-11.2012
162
WegielJ.DowjatK.KaczmarskiW.KuchnaI.NowickiK.FrackowiakJ.et al. (2008). The role of overexpressed DYRK1A protein in the early onset of neurofibrillary degeneration in Down syndrome. Acta Neuropathol.116, 391–407. 10.1007/s00401-008-0419-6
163
WeidemannA.KönigG.BunkeD.FischerP.SalbaumJ. M.MastersC. L.et al. (1989). Identification, biogenesis, and localization of precursors of Alzheimer’s disease A4 amyloid protein. Cell57, 115–126. 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90177-3
164
WillemM.TahirovicS.BuscheM. A.OvsepianS. V.ChafaiM.KootarS.et al. (2015). η-Secretase processing of APP inhibits neuronal activity in the hippocampus. Nature526, 443–447. 10.1038/nature14864
165
WilsonC. A.DomsR. W.ZhengH.LeeV. M. (2002). Presenilins are not required for A β42 production in the early secretory pathway. Nat. Neurosci.5, 849–855. 10.1038/nn898
166
WuY.DengY.ZhangS.LuoY.CaiF.ZhangZ.et al. (2015). Amyloid-β precursor protein facilitates the regulator of calcineurin 1-mediated apoptosis by downregulating proteasome subunit α type-5 and proteasome subunit β type-7. Neurobiol. Aging36, 169–177. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.07.029
167
WuY.LyP. T. T.SongW. (2014). Aberrant expression of RCAN1 in Alzheimer’s pathogenesis: a new molecular mechanism and a novel drug target. Mol. Neurobiol.50, 1085–1097. 10.1007/s12035-014-8704-y
168
WuY.SongW. (2013). Regulation of RCAN1 translation and its role in oxidative stress-induced apoptosis. FASEB J.27, 208–221. 10.1096/fj.12-213124
169
WuY.ZhangS.XuQ.ZouH.ZhouW.CaiF.et al. (2016). Regulation of global gene expression and cell proliferation by APP. Sci. Rep.6:22460. 10.1038/srep22460
170
YamazakiT.KooE. H.SelkoeD. J. (1996). Trafficking of cell-surface amyloid β-protein precursor. II. Endocytosis, recycling and lysosomal targeting detected by immunolocalization. J. Cell Sci.109, 999–1008.
171
YangY.SongW. (2013). Molecular links between Alzheimer’s disease and diabetes mellitus. Neuroscience250, 140–150. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.009
172
YangY.WuY.ZhangS.SongW. (2013). High glucose promotes Aβ production by inhibiting APP degradation. PLoS One8:e69824. 10.1371/journal.pone.0069824
173
YazakiM.TagawaK.MaruyamaK.SorimachiH.TsuchiyaT.IshiuraS.et al. (1996). Mutation of potential N-linked glycosylation sites in the Alzheimer’s disease amyloid precursor protein (APP). Neurosci. Lett.221, 57–60. 10.1016/s0304-3940(96)13285-7
174
YoshikaiS.SasakiH.Doh-uraK.FuruyaH.SakakiY. (1990). Genomic organization of the human amyloid β-protein precursor gene. Gene87, 257–263. 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90310-n
175
ZambranoN.BruniP.MinopoliG.MoscaR.MolinoD.RussoC.et al. (2001). The β-amyloid precursor protein APP is tyrosine-phosphorylated in cells expressing a constitutively active form of the Abl protoncogene. J. Biol. Chem.276, 19787–19792. 10.1074/jbc.m100792200
176
ZeidanQ.HartG. W. (2010). The intersections between O-GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation: implications for multiple signaling pathways. J. Cell Sci.123, 13–22. 10.1242/jcs.053678
177
ZengJ.ChenL.WangZ.ChenQ.FanZ.JiangH.et al. (2017). Marginal vitamin A deficiency facilitates Alzheimer’s pathogenesis. Acta Neuropathol.133, 967–982. 10.1007/s00401-017-1669-y
178
ZhangZ.NadeauP.SongW.DonovielD.YuanM.BernsteinA.et al. (2000). Presenilins are required for γ-secretase cleavage of β-APP and transmembrane cleavage of Notch-1. Nat. Cell Biol.2, 463–465. 10.1038/35017108
179
ZhangY. Q.SargeK. D. (2008). Sumoylation of amyloid precursor protein negatively regulates Aβ aggregate levels. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.374, 673–678. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.07.109
180
ZhangX.SongW. (2013). The role of APP and BACE1 trafficking in APP processing and amyloid-β generation. Alzheimers Res. Ther.5:46. 10.1186/alzrt211
181
ZhangY.SongW. (2017). Islet amyloid polypeptide: another key molecule in Alzheimer’s pathogenesis?Prog. Neurobiol.153, 100–120. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.03.001
182
ZhangS.WangZ.CaiF.ZhangM.WuY.ZhangJ.et al. (2017). BACE1 cleavage site selection critical for amyloidogenesis and Alzheimer’s pathogenesis. J. Neurosci.37, 6915–6925. 10.1523/jneurosci.0340-17.2017
183
ZhangX.WuY.CaiF.LiuS.Bromley-BritsK.XiaK.et al. (2017). A novel alzheimer-associated SNP in Tmp21 increases amyloidogenesis. Mol. Neurobiol. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1007/s12035-017-0459-9
184
ZhangX.WuY.DuanX.ChenW.ZouH.ZhangM.et al. (2015). Upregulation of SET expression by BACE1 and its implications in Down syndrome. Mol. Neurobiol.51, 781–790. 10.1007/s12035-014-8782-x
185
ZhangS.ZhangM.CaiF.SongW. (2013). Biological function of Presenilin and its role in AD pathogenesis. Transl. Neurodegener.2:15. 10.1186/2047-9158-2-15
186
ZhaoG.MaoG.TanJ.DongY.CuiM. Z.KimS. H.et al. (2004). Identification of a new presenilin-dependent ζ-cleavage site within the transmembrane domain of amyloid precursor protein. J. Biol. Chem.279, 50647–50650. 10.1074/jbc.c400473200
187
ZimmermannK.HergetT.SalbaumJ. M.SchubertW.HilbichC.CramerM.et al. (1988). Localization of the putative precursor of Alzheimer’s disease-specific amyloid at nuclear envelopes of adult human muscle. EMBO J.7, 367–372.
Summary
Keywords
Alzheimer’s disease, APP, Aβ, post-translational modifications, trafficking
Citation
Wang X, Zhou X, Li G, Zhang Y, Wu Y and Song W (2017) Modifications and Trafficking of APP in the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 10:294. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00294
Received
01 June 2017
Accepted
31 August 2017
Published
15 September 2017
Volume
10 - 2017
Edited by
Ildikó Rácz, University Hospital Bonn, Germany
Reviewed by
Ioannis Sotiropoulos, University of Minho, Portugal; Chuang Wang, Ningbo University, China; Erica Lana, Karolinska Institute (KI), Sweden; Fabrizio Piazza, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2017 Wang, Zhou, Li, Zhang, Wu and Song.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yili Wu yili_wu2004@yahoo.ca Weihong Song weihong@mail.ubc.ca
†These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.