CLINICAL TRIAL article
Front. Neuroergonomics
Sec. Clinical Neuroergonomics
This article is part of the Research TopicPortable Neurotechnology and Brain-Computer Interfaces for Bedside Diagnosis, Field Deployment, and Neurorehabilitation: Advancing Clinical NeuroergonomicsView all articles
Automated Thermo-mechanical Therapy for Immediate Relief in Chronic Non-Specific Lower Back Pain (cNSLBP): A Randomized Controlled Trial
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, United States
- 2Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, United States
- 3Clinical Research Institute, Ceragem Clinical Inc, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: Chronic non-specific lower back pain (cNSLBP) is a prevalent and disabling condition, imposing a substantial socioeconomic burden due to high healthcare costs and productivity losses, with limited accessible and effective long-term treatment options. Automated Thermo-mechanical Therapy (ATT) is a promising, non-drug intervention that leverages innovative technical advances to provide multimodal pain relief, offering accessibility and low-cost delivery. This study tested ATT for immediate pain relief in individuals with cNSLBP in a single-session, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Methods: Forty participants with cNSLBP were assigned to receive either active ATT (n=20) or control ATT (n=20) in a 40-minute session with urn randomization. The active device applied heated cylindrical rollers along the spine, using far-infrared heat and mechanical tissue stimulation tailored to spinal alignment. In the control condition, the device used minimal mechanical therapy intensity without heat, targeting only the cervical area to avoid lower back therapeutic effects. Pre-and post-intervention assessments measured changes in pain intensity (primary outcome) via a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale for Pain (VAS-P100), alongside secondary outcomes assessing pain characteristics, anxiety, and functional mobility. Results: The active ATT group showed a significant reduction in pain on the VAS-P100, with an average decrease of 46.8%, compared to 17.0% in the control group. Participants in the active group also reported significantly greater subjective pain relief (p = 7.88e-05). Secondary outcomes demonstrated significant improvements in lumbar flexibility (Modified-Modified Schober Test, MMST) for the active ATT group compared to the control group (p = 0.0031). No adverse events were reported, and all participants tolerated the intervention well. Conclusions: A single session of ATT provides immediate, significant pain relief in individuals with cNSLBP, supporting its potential as a safe, non-invasive option for managing chronic back pain. Future studies should examine the long-term benefits of repeated ATT sessions and explore mechanistic insights into thermo-mechanical stimulation's effects on pain and function.
Keywords: Att, cNSPLBP, Pain, RCT - randomized controlled trial, Thermomechanical Therapy
Received: 28 Jul 2025; Accepted: 08 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Donnery, Pilloni, FallahRad, Lee, Han, Park, Kim, Charvet and Bikson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Kyle Donnery
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
