Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Neurosci., 23 January 2024
Sec. Neurodegeneration
This article is part of the Research Topic Genetics and Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease in Asian Populations View all 6 articles

Editorial: Genetics and biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease in Asian populations

\nXiaopu Zhou,
Xiaopu Zhou1,2*Kin Y. Mok,,Kin Y. Mok3,4,5Amy K. Y. Fu,,Amy K. Y. Fu3,4,6
  • 1The Centre for Applied Genomics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • 2Genetics and Genome Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • 3Division of Life Science, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience and Molecular Neuroscience Center, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • 4Hong Kong Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hong Kong Science Park, Hong Kong, China
  • 5Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
  • 6Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Science, Disease and Drug Development, HKUST Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a significant global health concern, with its impact amplified by the aging population. Researchers have been working to unravel the intricate mechanisms underlying this inheritable and age-related neurodegenerative disorder, with great efforts have been directed toward devising tools for early detection and risk assessment during its initial stages. Recent strides in genetic research have illuminated key genetic variants implicated in AD pathogenesis (Kunkle et al., 2019), while fluid biomarker investigations have revealed specific proteins reflecting disease severity in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma (Leuzy et al., 2021).

However, it's important to note that much of this research has been concentrated within cohorts of European ancestry. Non-European descent populations, with their different genetic and lifestyle characteristics, have been underrepresented in these investigations (Zhou et al., 2021). Considering these differences, alternative genetic risk factors might play a role in the development of AD in these populations. A recent transethnic AD genome-wide association study identified ancestry-specific loci, underscoring the need for more research into non-European populations' genetics, biomarkers, and mechanisms (Rajabli et al., 2023).

Notably, Asian populations constitute a substantial proportion of the global population. To bridge the gap, we initiated “Genetics and biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease in Asian populations” Research Topic in January 2022. This initiative aimed to spotlight AD and dementia research specifically in Asian populations, fostering collaboration and sharing research findings. By June 2022, this effort yielded 12 manuscripts, with five making it into the Research Topic. These contributions spanned various ethnic origins, involving participants from Iran, China, and Japan. They also covered diverse research approaches, including biomarkers analysis in cerebrospinal fluid, plasma, and urine, as well as brain transcriptome analysis and Mendelian randomization.

In particular, study led by Asadi et al. delved deep into the role of RNA-binding proteins within AD, presenting potential biomarkers including BDNF and Tristetraprolin (TTP) that emerge from blood transcript level analysis in the Iranian population. In parallel, Sun et al. meticulously examined the correlation between plasma biomarkers and AD in a Chinese cohort. Their findings underscored the diagnostic potential of specific protein markers including TNF-a and plasma ATN biomarkers (abeta42/40 ratio, p-tau181, and NfL) (Sun et al.). Meanwhile, Chen et al. utilized liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry to meticulously distinguish urine biomarkers for vascular dementia (VD) from other conditions. Impressively, they pinpointed a set of 18 proteins with the capability to effectively classify VD from both AD and normal control groups in the Chinese population (Chen et al.). Gan et al.'s study further enriched our understanding by investigating the intricate interplay between blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability and dementia in a Chinese cohort. They illuminated potential connections involving the CSF/serum albumin ratio (Qalb) – a marker of BBB permeability – and vascular risk factors also AD ATN CSF biomarkers (Gan et al.). Lastly, Zhu et al. explored the intricate relationship between smoking and AD within Chinese and Japanese cohorts. Employing Mendelian randomization analysis, they rigorously assessed whether any causal connection existed between smoking and AD risk. Interestingly, their comprehensive findings unveiled no significant association between smoking and AD (Zhu et al.).

Significantly, a substantial portion of these studies have delved deeply into exploring and harnessing the potential of biomarkers. With the swift advancements in biotechnology, the prospect of clinically accessible biomarker solutions for diagnosing AD is becoming increasingly plausible (Blennow and Zetterberg, 2018). Specifically, the highly sensitive proteome platform facilitates precise detection of neurodegeneration markers in the blood (Hampel et al., 2018; Hansson et al., 2022). Complementarily, high-throughput proteome methods enhance the accuracy of disease diagnosis and staging by establishing a scoring system based on multi-biomarker panels (Jiang et al., 2022). Besides proteome analysis, emerging biomarkers from various sources, such as imaging analysis (Liu et al., 2018), transcriptome (Zhong et al., 2021), metabolome (Green et al., 2023), and gut microbiota (Jiang et al., 2017), hold promise for aiding AD diagnosis. These diverse methods address distinct aspects of pathophysiological changes in patients throughout the course of the disease, potentially reshaping future clinical practices in AD diagnosis.

Nonetheless, extending beyond accurate diagnosis, the potential to revolutionize Alzheimer's disease (AD) lies in tools and methods for early risk prediction and patient stratification. Consider, for instance, the utilization of imaging (Li et al., 2019), polygenic risk analysis (Zhou et al., 2023), and fluid biomarkers (Palmqvist et al., 2021) to forecast AD risk. These applications must undergo rigorous testing and optimization within general populations before being integrated into routine clinical practices. Furthermore, the correlation between the APOE-ε4 genotype and ARIA symptoms in AD patients undergoing monoclonal antibody therapy underscores the importance of improved patient stratification during drug development and disease intervention (VandeVrede et al., 2020). While undeniably pivotal, the development of such strategies necessitates meticulous analyses conducted within well-designed AD cohorts, backed by multi-omics data and meticulously documented clinical information. Such comprehensive resources would empower us to map the onset and progression of AD on a population scale, enabling a deeper comprehension of its underlying causes and facilitating clinical research aimed at early intervention solutions.

Recognizing the diverse medical practices across global populations, we foresee the necessity for concerted endeavors aimed at establishing regional AD cohorts. The precedent set by Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) stands as a testament to the success that can be achieved through such an approach, fostering fruitful research outcomes (Petersen et al., 2010). This proactive approach would enable us to address AD diagnosis and interventions in a systemic manner, while also considering the unique contexts of each society. It holds the potential to elevate AD diagnosis and interventions to a more comprehensive systemic perspective, promising the emergence of more encompassing and impactful outcomes in the near future.

Author contributions

XZ: Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. KM: Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. AF: Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

We extend our gratitude to all the contributing authors of the Research Topic “Genetics and biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease in Asian populations” and to all the participants involved in the related research.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Blennow, K., and Zetterberg, H. (2018). Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: current status and prospects for the future. J. Intern. Med. 284, 643–663. doi: 10.1111/joim.12816

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Green, R. E., Lord, J., Scelsi, M. A., Xu, J., Wong, A., Naomi-James, S., et al. (2023). Investigating associations between blood metabolites, later life brain imaging measures, and genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 15, 38. doi: 10.1186/s13195-023-01184-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hampel, H., O'Bryant, S. E., Molinuevo, J. L., Zetterberg, H., Masters, C. L., Lista, S., et al. (2018). Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer disease: mapping the road to the clinic. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 14, 639–652. doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0079-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hansson, O., Edelmayer, R. M., Boxer, A. L., Carrillo, M. C., Mielke, M. M., Rabinovici, G. D., et al. (2022). The Alzheimer's Association appropriate use recommendations for blood biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 18, 2669–2686. doi: 10.1002/alz.12756

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, C., Li, G., Huang, P., Liu, Z., and Zhao, B. (2017). The gut microbiota and Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 58, 1–15. doi: 10.3233/JAD-161141

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, Y., Zhou, X., Ip, F. C., Chan, P., Chen, Y., Lai, N. C. H., et al. (2022). Large-scale plasma proteomic profiling identifies a high-performance biomarker panel for Alzheimer's disease screening and staging. Alzheimers Dement. 18, 88–102. doi: 10.1002/alz.12369

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kunkle, B. W., Grenier-Boley, B., Sims, R., Bis, J. C., Damotte, V., Naj, A. C., et al. (2019). Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer's disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat. Genet. 51, 414–430. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0358-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Leuzy, A., Cullen, N. C., Mattsson-Carlgren, N., and Hansson, O. (2021). Current advances in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 34, 266–274. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000904

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., Habes, M., Wolk, D. A., and Fan, Y. (2019). A deep learning model for early prediction of Alzheimer's disease dementia based on hippocampal magnetic resonance imaging data. Alzheimers Dement. 15, 1059–1070. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.02.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, X., Chen, K., Wu, T., Weidman, D., Lure, F., Li, J., et al. (2018). Use of multimodality imaging and artificial intelligence for diagnosis and prognosis of early stages of Alzheimer's disease. Transl. Res. 194, 56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2018.01.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Palmqvist, S., Tideman, P., Cullen, N., Zetterberg, H., and Blennow, K. (2021). Prediction of future Alzheimer's disease dementia using plasma phospho-tau combined with other accessible measures. Nat. Med. 27, 1034–1042. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01348-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Petersen, R. C., Aisen, P. S., Beckett, L. A., Donohue, M. C., Gamst, A. C., Harvey, D. J., et al. (2010). Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): clinical characterization. Neurology 74, 201. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181cb3e25

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rajabli, F., Benchek, P., Tosto, G., Kushch, N., Sha, J., Bazemore, K., et al. (2023). Multi-ancestry genome-wide meta-analysis of 56,241 individuals identifies LRRC4C, LHX5-AS1 and nominates ancestry-specific loci PTPRK, GRB14, and KIAA0825 as novel risk loci for Alzheimer's disease: the Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium. medRxiv 2023.07.06.23292311. doi: 10.1101/2023.07.06.23292311

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

VandeVrede, L., Gibbs, D. M., Koestler, M., La Joie, R., Ljubenkov, P. A., Provost, K., et al. (2020). Symptomatic amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in an APOE ε4/ε4 patient treated with aducanumab. Alzheimers Dement. 12, e12101. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12101

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhong, H., Zhou, X., Jiang, Y., Chen, Y., Lai, N. C. H., Tong, E. P. S., et al. (2021). Blood transcriptome analysis for Alzheimer' disease in Hong Kong Chinese population. Alzheimer's Dement. 17, e056643. doi: 10.1002/alz.056643

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, X., Chen, Y., Ip, F. C. F., Jiang, Y., Cao, H., Lv, G., et al. (2023). Deep learning-based polygenic risk analysis for Alzheimer's disease prediction. Commun. Med. 3, 49. doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00269-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, X., Li, Y. Y. T., Fu, A. K. Y., and Ip, N. Y. (2021). Polygenic score models for Alzheimer's disease: from research to clinical applications. Front. Neurosci. 15, 650220. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.650220

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Alzheimer, biomarker, Asian, ATN, mass-spec, Mendelian randomization, diagnosis, stratification

Citation: Zhou X, Mok KY and Fu AKY (2024) Editorial: Genetics and biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease in Asian populations. Front. Neurosci. 18:1357783. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1357783

Received: 18 December 2023; Accepted: 11 January 2024;
Published: 23 January 2024.

Edited and reviewed by: Wendy Noble, University of Exeter, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2024 Zhou, Mok and Fu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xiaopu Zhou, xiaopu.zhou@sickkids.ca

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.