ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nucl. Eng.
Sec. Nuclear Reactor Design
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancements in Fusion Neutronics and Applications in Blanket TechnologiesView all articles
Accelerating Engineering Design of Breeder Blankets with Parametric Optimisation and Sequential Learning
Provisionally accepted
- United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, Abingdon, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The competing requirements of fusion breeder blankets and the high dimensionality of their design space necessitate a systematic treatment to map the variations in performance against given objective metrics and to understand the operational envelope. In this endeavour, a digital engineering pipeline for design evaluation and optimisation has been developed. The tools involved are: Hypnos for parametric breeder blanket geometry instantiation, OpenMC for neutronics analysis, MOOSE for thermal hydraulics analysis, and SLEDO for design space sampling, sensitivity analysis and optimisation. An optimisation of the baseline design for a solid ceramic breeder mock-up that is relevant to the Lithium Breeding Tritium Innovation (LIBRTI) program is performed. Two optimisation studies are performed, the first involving only neutronics, while the second included the impact of thermal hydraulics. The figures of merit are taken to be the Tritium Breeding Ratio (TBR) and the pressure drop of the outer coolant (combined in a weighted sum for the second analysis). In the first study, for the same acquisition function (taken to be Expected Improvement) two different values are selected for the hyperparameter that controls the trade-off between exploration and exploitation. In the second study, with the inclusion of thermal hydraulics a larger parameter space was explored to assess the performance of the method in a higher dimensionality setting. In both cases, the selected figures of merit were improved over the baseline design. Finally, we discuss extensions of the procedure to include a more thorough multi-physics analysis, and a more sophisticated treatment of multiple objectives.
Keywords: Breeder blankets, neutronics, optimisation, Sequential learning, OpenMC, MOOSE, SLEDO, Hypnos
Received: 28 Aug 2025; Accepted: 21 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Humphrey, Brooks, Mungale, Davis and Foster. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Luke Humphrey, luke.humphrey@ukaea.uk
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.