Abstract
Microvesicles (MVs) are released from almost all cell brain types into the microenvironment and are emerging as a novel way of cell-to-cell communication. This review focuses on MVs discharged by microglial cells, the brain resident myeloid cells, which comprise ∼10–12% of brain population. We summarize first evidence indicating that MV shedding is a process activated by the ATP receptor P2X7 and that shed MVs represent a secretory pathway for the inflammatory cytokine IL-β. We then discuss subsequent findings which clarify how IL-1 β can be locally processed and released from MVs into the extracellular environment. In addition, we describe the current understanding about the mechanism of P2X7-dependent MV formation and membrane abscission, which, by involving sphingomyelinase activity and ceramide formation, may share similarities with exosome biogenesis. Finally we report our recent results which show that microglia-derived MVs can stimulate neuronal activity and participate to the propagation of inflammatory signals, and suggest new areas for future investigation.
Subcellular Origin and Composition of MVs Shed from the Cell Surface
Microvesicles (MVs), also referred to as shed vesicles or ectosomes (Sadallah et al., 2011), are small (0.1–1 μm) vesicles which bud directly from the plasma membrane and are released into the extracellular environment upon cell activation. Shedding of MVs typically involves a budding process, in which surface blebs selectively accumulate cellular constituents that are packaged into MVs. MVs contain a variety of cell surface receptors, intracellular signaling proteins and genetic materials derived from the cell of origin. In terms of composition, MVs originating from distinct cell types are molecularly different from each other, reflecting the differential expression of proteins of various donor cells. Composition and biological activity of MVs also vary depending on the state (e.g., resting, stimulated) of donor cells and on the agent employed for stimulation (Bernimoulin et al., ). The mechanisms involved in MV budding and discharge are beginning to emerge and suggest the involvement of ESCRT and/or ARF6 (Cocucci et al., ; Muralidharan-Chari et al., 2009; Gan and Gould, 2011).
Besides MVs, most cells secrete into the environment a markedly distinct type of small extracellular vesicles by an alternative two-step process. This mechanism includes the bud of intraluminal vesicles at endosomes during multivesicular bodies (MVBs) maturation and subsequent vesicle secretion upon fusion of MVBs with the plasma membrane (Cocucci et al., ; Simons and Raposo, 2009). Small (40–80 nm) extracellular vesicles released by this process are called exosomes and represent a more homogeneous type of vesicles, enriched in specific components (tetraspanning proteins, CD63 and CD9, and alix).
Biological Activity and Mechanism of MV Interaction with Target Cells
Until a decade ago, MVs were considered as in vitro artifact, or alternatively regarded as a way of eliminating unwanted material from cells. MVs were also often confused with apoptotic bodies generating during cell death or with exosomes, discharged upon fusion of MVBs with the plasma membrane. Several reasons may explain why for many years MVs have been largely overlooked. First, discriminating between different types of extracellular vesicles is difficult and requires a combination of electron microscopy and biochemical techniques. In addition, while the presence of markers of endosomal origin (alix, Tg110, CD63, and CD9) is an accepted criterion to identify exosomes, no universal markers have been identified yet for MVs discharged outside the cells from the cell surface, which are highly heterogeneous in composition. Also, studies of MVs have been constrained by the limitations of current methodology employed for their isolation and quantification. MVs are usually isolated from culture medium or body fluids by differential centrifugation or affinity capture. However, immunosorbent or bead capture assays do not allow isolating all the vesicles present in the samples and differences in centrifuge speeds used to eliminate whole cells may discard materials which in different laboratories are measured as MVs (Horstman et al., 2007). Furthermore the most widely used methods to quantify MVs, i.e., flow cytometry and dynamic light scattering, are biased toward the detection or larger MVs (Dragovic et al., ). Although interesting advances in MV quantification and isolation have been recently achieved with introduction of new methodology such as a nanoparticle tracking or micro- and nano fluidics (Chen et al., ), these new technologies for sizing and quantifying MVs still need to be standardized in order to provide reliable and reproducible methods. Despite these technical limitations, now-a-days MVs attract great interest as their shedding is recognized as a widespread mode of intercellular communication in different body compartments. Indeed shed MVs, similarly to exosomes, may serve as information packets to guide the phenotype of surrounding cells by transferring lipids, proteins, and genetic material from donor to target cells (Thery et al., 2009). Furthermore shed MVs, being enriched in various bioactive molecules, play pleiotropic roles in many physiological processes, including development (Liegeois et al., 2006; Kolotuev et al., 2009), coagulation, and immune reaction (Thery et al., 2009), as well as in diseases, such as cancer progression (Yu et al., 2006, 2009; Keller et al., 2009; Gan and Gould, 2011), viral infection (Dukers et al., ; Gould et al., 2003; Fang et al., ; Logozzi et al., 2009; Nazarenko et al., 2010), and amyloidopathies (Fevrier et al., ; Leblanc et al., 2006; Alais et al., ). Released MVs may remain in the extracellular space in close proximity to the place of origin or move by diffusion and enter biological fluids, such as blood, urine, and synovial fluid, where they are emerging as clinically valuable markers of disease states (Doeuvre et al., ). MVs have the same topology as the cell of origin but loose membrane asymmetry and are characterized by the presence of the phospholipid phosphatidylserine (PS) externalized at their surface (Zwaal and Schroit, 1997; Sims and Wiedmer, 2001). PS exposed on shed MVs represents a determinant for recognition on recipient cells, through binding to the corresponding cellular PS receptors (Al-Nedawi et al., ). The interaction of MVs with recipient cells can be followed by fusion or endocytosis. Alternatively, MVs can undergo rupture and release their luminal active components, thus modulating, by protein secretion, the activity of target cells.
Blebbing and MV Formation Induced by P2X7 Receptor Activation
A specialized type of MV release exists for cells that express the ATP receptor P2X7, and which shed MVs from the cell surface when this receptor is activated by ATP. P2X7 receptor is an ATP-gated ion channel highly expressed in immune cells, particularly macrophages (Steinberg et al., 1987) mast cells (Cockcroft and Gomperts, ), and microglia (Visentin and Levi, 1997) where it controls the release of inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β and IL-18 (Ferrari et al., ). Activation of P2X7 receptor induces efficient assembly of inflammosome, the protein complex which activates the IL-1β processing enzyme caspase-1. This process is followed by rapid cytokine secretion (Qu et al., 2007). P2X7 receptor differs from other members of the P2X family in its relatively low affinity for ATP and the presence of a long cytoplasmic C-terminus that contains several protein–protein interaction motifs. Depending on the ATP concentration and time of exposure, P2X7 receptor functions as either an ion channel or a non-selective pore, the latter generally leading to cytotoxicity and apoptotic cell death. Many studies have shown that dramatic morphological changes occur in cells endogenously or heterologously expressing P2X7 receptors during and subsequent to receptor activation (Hogquist et al., 1991; Ferrari et al., ). These changes consist in rapid formation of cell membrane blebs and are associated to cell death upon sustained P2X7 receptor activation. Membrane blebbing results from several intracellular signaling events, which are induced by occupancy of the receptor, such as the activation of protein kinases and other effector enzymes (Duan and Neary, ). In particular, several lines of evidence indicate that P2X7 – induced blebbing is dependent upon P38 and requires ROCK activation, which causes local disassembly of the cytoskeletal elements, associated to the P2X7 C-terminus (Budagian et al., ; Morelli et al., 2003; Verhoef et al., 2003). Notably, surface blebbing is preceded by loss of plasma membrane asymmetry and exposure of phosphatidylserine (PS) at the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane, a process controlled by specific enzymes, named flippase, floppase, and lipid scramblase, which control PS segregation in the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane (Hugel et al., 2005). Externalized PS is a commonly accepted marker for cell apoptosis. However, a pioneer study by Surprenant and colleagues (MacKenzie et al., 2001) dissociated the P2X7-induced bleb formation from cell apoptosis, by showing in monocytes that P2X7-induced PS externalization and bleb formation occur within the first few minutes of receptor activation and is reversible after brief stimulation. MacKenzye and colleagues also showed that, during blebbing, MVs with externalized PS can be formed and released into the extracellular space as a result of bleb detachment from the cell surface. Notably the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β is packaged into plasma membrane blebs, which are subsequently shed, as MVs, into the extracellular space from reactive monocytes (Figure 1A). Almost ten years ago these results provided the first evidence that P2X7-induced MV shedding acts as a secretory pathway for rapid release of IL-1β and may represent a general mechanism for secretion of leaderless secretory proteins from P2X7-expressing myeloid cells.
Figure 1
Emerging Role of MVs Derived from Brain Cells: P2X7-Dependent MV Shedding and IL-1β Release in Microglia
In the recent years, a series of studies has indicated relevant physiological and pathological functions for extracellular vesicles within the brain. These functions include fundamental processes occurring in brain, such as axonal growth and regeneration, axon-glia communication, inter-neuronal transfer of information across synapses, modulation of neuro-immune interactions, as well as disease-associated events, including tumor progression, and spreading of pathogenic agents or misfolded proteins. The majority of these studies focused, however, on exosomes rather than MVs shed from the cell surface of brain cells (Table 1). Indeed only one report indicates the existence of MVs of neuronal origin (Schiera et al., 2007) and there is no evidence for shedding of MVs from oligodendrocytes. Nevertheless, a mixed population of MVs and exosomes has been detected in vivo in the cerebrospinal fluid isolated from sheep (Vella et al., 2008), and our recent evidence indicate that a fraction of large MVs (mean size = 420 nm) pelleted from rat CSF by differential centrifugation displays neuronal or oligodendroglial markers (Verderio et al., 2012), suggesting that even neurons, and oligodendrocytes produce MVs in vivo. Larger interest has been raised so far by MVs shed from the cell surface of microglia, the immune cells of the nervous system, which play key role in inflammatory and degenerative brain pathologies. Microglial cells are brain resident myeloid cells, which migrate into the CNS during early embryogenesis and comprise ∼10–12% of total brain population (Ransohoff and Cardona, 2010). Although they are traditionally distinguished from infiltrating peripheral macrophages, which can migrate to the brain from blood upon CNS damage or inflammation and do not differentiate into microglia, in the injured CNS, activated microglia and infiltrating macrophages cannot be distinguished by their morphology or by specific antigenic markers.
Table 1
| Cell of origin | Exosomes | Ectosomes/shed MVs | Mixed population |
|---|---|---|---|
| Astrocytes | Taylor et al. (2007), Bianco et al. (), Guescini et al. (2010), Sbai et al. (2010), Wang et al. (2011) | Bianco et al. () | Proia et al. (2008), Ceruti et al. (), Verderio et al., 2012; in vivo) |
| Microglia | Potolicchio et al. (2005), Bianco et al. (), Tamboli et al. (2010) | Bianco et al. (, ), Chahed et al. (), Tamboli et al. (2010), Antonucci et al. (), Verderio et al. (2012) | Verderio et al., 2012; in vivo) |
| Oligodendrocytes | Kramer-Albers et al. (2007), Trajkovic et al. (2008), Strauss et al. (2010), Fitzner et al. (), Bakhti et al. () | Scolding et al., 1989; in vivo), Verderio et al., 2012; in vivo) | |
| Neurons | Faure et al. (), Korkut et al. (2009), Lachenal et al. (2011), Ghidoni et al. (2011), Yuyama et al. (2012) | Schiera et al. (2007), Verderio et al., 2012; (in vivo) |
Microvesicles of different brain cell origin.
As immune cells, the primary function of microglia is to maintain brain tissue homeostasis, to provide the first line of defense during infection or brain injury and to promote tissue repair. In normal brain “surveillant” microglia display a ramified morphology, characterized by long and thin processes, which communicate with surrounding neurons and other glial cells and continuously scan the microenvironment to exert a guard function for incoming pathogens and brain alterations. In response to many types of alarm signals (cytokines, material from apoptotic cells, and exogenous viral factors) “surveillant” microglia undergo several levels of activation and migrate to the site of infection or injury to eliminate pathogens or to phagocyte dead cells and protein aggregates. Depending upon the nature and duration of environmental signals, microglia can undergo a “classical” pro-inflammatory activation, transforming into fully activated inflammatory effector cells (cytokines-secreting cells), or an “alternative” activation, generally associated with tuning of inflammatory response, protection from disease, and tissue repair. These two extremes along multiple states of microglia activation are commonly indicated as M1 (pro-inflammatory) and M2 (pro-regenerative) phenotypes, in analogy to the distinction originally made between M1 and M2 macrophages (Mantovani and Locati, 2009; David and Kroner, ; Saijo and Glass, 2011). Experimentally, these states are commonly achieved by treating cells in vitro with polarizing agents, such as anti inflammatory cytokines (Saijo and Glass, 2011).
A few years ago we reported that a MV-mediated mechanism for IL-1β release occurs in microglial cells (Bianco et al., ), very similar to that first described in monocytes (MacKenzie et al., 2001). By video microscopy experiments, we showed that cultured microglia form membrane blebs (Figure 1B) and shed MVs from the cell surface upon P2X7 receptor activation. Isolation of MVs produced from reactive microglia, followed by IL-1β evaluation by ELISA or western blotting revealed that MVs produced by LPS-treated microglia store and subsequently release IL-1β into the environment in an ATP- and P2X7-dependent manner. IL-1β efflux from shed MVs is enhanced by ATP stimulation and inhibited by pretreatment with the P2X7 receptor antagonist oxidized ATP, thus indicating a crucial involvement of the pore-forming P2X7 receptor in the release of the cytokine. Notably, we found that shedding of MVs from microglial cells is not only promoted by P2X7 receptor activation through exogenous ATP, but also by ATP endogenously released from healthy astrocytes in astrocyte-microglia co-cultures. Although ATP is typically considered a danger signal, this observation represented a first indication that MVs can be released from microglia even in the absence of cellular damage.
How Does IL-1β Get through the Membrane of MVs?
The MV-mediated mechanism for IL-1β release originally proposed by Surprenant’s laboratory left a question unsolved: how does mature IL-1β get through the membrane of MVs and reach the extracellular space? Later observations from our laboratory (Bianco et al., ) and from Di Virgilio’s group (Ferrari et al., ; Pizzirani et al., 2007) provided a possible answer: MVs shed from microglia and dendritic cells, bear P2X7 receptors in their membranes and are loaded with caspase-1. This enzyme becomes activated upon P2X7 receptor stimulation and is responsible for intravesicular processing of the biological inactive precursor of IL-1β (pro-IL-1β) into the active form of the cytokine. Recent evidence obtained in macrophages confirmed these findings by showing that extracellular vesicles, both exosomes and shed MVs, carry components of the inflammosome, in addition to the IL-1β converting enzyme (Qu et al., 2009; Sarkar et al., 2009).
Notably, activation of P2X7 receptors, followed by opening of large pores and MV lysis may represent the mechanism by which IL-1β gets through membrane of MVs. P2X7-dependent disruption of MVs was indeed reported to mediate the efflux of IL-1β from dendritic cells (Ferrari et al., ). However, differently from what described in dendritic cells, we found that IL-1β release from microglia is not the consequence of MV lysis. This was indicated by the observation that IL-1β release is not paralleled by GFP efflux from GFP-labeled MVs, produced by N9 microglial cells (Balcaitis et al., ), which stably express the fluorescent protein (Bianco et al., ). GFP is a 40-kDa cytosolic protein, that can be released extracellularly upon MV disruption but not through the P2X7 pore, which is permeable to molecules up to 1 kDa.
Although further studies are necessary to better define how IL-1β gets through membrane of MVs, it can be hypothesized that, once microglia-derived MVs approach the plasma membrane of target cells, where the ATP concentration is higher than in the bulk solution, the P2X7 receptor is activated, IL-1β is processed by caspase-1, and released from MVs.
Biogenesis of MVs Induced by P2X7 Receptor Activation
Microvesicles emanate from viable cells through the outward blebbing of their plasma membrane. Budding of MVs shares many features with budding of viral particles and intraluminal vesicle budding inside endosomes, during MVBs biogenesis. The latter process occurs through the invagination of small intraluminal vesicles of about 50 nm in diameter which then pinch off from the endosomal membrane and are released extracellularly as exosomes, upon fusion of MVBs with the plasma membrane. Exosome formation, as well as the egress of a few enveloped viruses, is generally dependent on the ESCRT (endosomal sorting complex required for transport) machinery, which regulates membrane scission. Recent studies indicated that fission of exosome membrane is catalyzed, in particular, by components of the ESCRT-III complex, called charged multivesicular body proteins (CHMPs; Hanson et al., 2009; Wollert et al., 2009; Wollert and Hurley, 2010) and by the AAA-ATPase vacuolar protein sorting-associated 4 (VPS4; Babst, ). Other pathways that promotes exosome biogenesis are emerging, which depend on lipids raft composition, the phospholipid LBPA (Matsuo et al., 2004), the sphingolipid ceramide, and activity of neutral sphingomyelinase (Trajkovic et al., 2008). However it is still unclear how these factors combine to promote exosome secretion (Gan and Gould, 2011). Trajkovic and coworker, for example, clearly showed that enrichment in ceramide is sufficient to trigger spontaneous vesiculation by an invagination mechanism which is independent of the ESCRT machinery, thus suggesting that distinct mechanisms may control the biogenesis of specific subsets of exosomes.
A few years ago we gained some insights into the molecular mechanism which mediates bleb formations and (exo)vesiculation upon activation of P2X7 receptor in glial cells, both microglia and astrocytes (Bianco et al., ). It was known that P2X7-dependent blebbing is preceded by alteration of the transbilayer lipid distribution and requires ROCK and P38 MAP kinase activation, similarly to apoptotic blebbing (Piccin et al., 2007; Al-Nedawi et al., ; Pap et al., 2009; Cocucci and Meldolesi, ). However an unsolved question was how signaling by P2X7 receptor leads to alterations of the biophysical properties of the plasma membrane, which together with actin-cytoskeleton re-organization are a prerequisite for membrane blebbing and vesiculation at the surface of healthy cells.
We found that biogenesis of MVs storing IL-1β is controlled by acid sphingomyelinase (A-SMase), the enzyme which hydrolyzes sphingomyelin (SM) to the sphingolipid ceramide. Following P2X7 receptor activation, a src-protein tyrosine kinase interacts with the C-terminus of the receptor (Denlinger et al., ) and promptly phosphorylates P38 MAP kinase. P38 phosphorylation, in turn, induces translocation of A-SMase to the plasma membrane outer leaflet, where it generates ceramide, thereby inducing budding of MVs (Bianco et al., ; Figure 2). Although A-SMase has been historically associated to lysosomes, our data are consistent with evidence indicating that the enzyme is activated rapidly upon stimulation of various receptors, and is recruited to the plasma membrane to mediate receptor-dependent signaling (Grassme et al., 2001; Gulbins and Kolesnick, 2003; Marchesini and Hannun, 2004; Perrotta et al., 2010). Formation of blebs is likely caused by redistribution of extracellularly synthesized ceramide within the bilayer and by local enrichment of the cone-shape sphingolipid into the inner leaflet of the membrane. Indeed due to its spontaneous negative curvature, ceramide may induce membrane subdomains with curvature different from the adjacent planar membrane (Subra et al., 2007). In addition, hydrolysis of SM, which has a high affinity for cholesterol, may result in increased efflux of cholesterol. As this lipid is a major determinant of membrane fluidity and structural integrity of the plasma membrane (Simons and Ikonen, 1997) cholesterol efflux may cause an increase in membrane fluidity (Slotte et al., 1989; Neufeld et al., 1996) thus contributing to membrane destabilization and facilitating blebbing and MV shedding (Van Blitterswijk et al., 1982; Chang et al., ; Tepper et al., 2000). Bleb formation probably occurs from surface lipid rafts (Del Conde et al., ), where the P2X7 receptor localizes. In such domains, cytoskeleton/membrane proteins, directly interacting with the P2X7 receptor or P2X7 receptor-dependent signaling components, can be recruited. We demonstrated the key role of A-SMase in MV formation using the pharmacological inhibitor imipramine, and genetic inactivation of the enzyme. Both approaches strongly abolished release of MVs and of IL-1β from reactive glial cells (Bianco et al., ).
Figure 2
Other pathways besides shed MVs have been proposed to mediate IL-1β release from myeloid cells, including exosomes and exocytosis of secretory lysosomes (Andrei et al., ; Qu et al., 2007). However, enrichment of IL-1β in larger MVs, derived from the plasma membrane, and complete blockade of MV shedding and IL-1β release from A-SMase KO cells indicates that MV shedding represents the major mechanism mediating secretion of the inflammatory cytokine from reactive microglial cells.
Our results are consistent with the involvement of neutral sphingomyelinase and ceramide formation in the budding of exosomes in oligodendrocytes (Trajkovic et al., 2008) and represent further evidence that MV budding may share features with exosome biogenesis. The role of acid-rather than neutral-sphigomyelinase in MV formation suggests that different members of the SMase family may control the release of distinct types of extracellular vesicles from brain cells, independently of the ESCRT complex.
What remains to be clarified is whether acid SMase activity may play a general role in shedding of MVs that occurs independently of P2X7 activation, such as discharge of MVs from the plasma membrane of highly proliferating cells, which is involved in tumor growth and invasion. Similarly, it remains to be determined if sphingomyelinase activity and ceramide production may be also involved in nanotube formation, by promoting the protrusion of filopodia – like structures which then extend as tubes toward distant cells.
Why Do Microglia Use MVs to Release IL-1β?
Which is the main advantage for a cell to release IL-1β through MVs rather than exporting the cytokine directly? Shed MVs, containing packages of IL-1β, can deliver the cytokine at significant distance from the donor cell, in possible proximity to IL-1β receptors present on target cells, thus preventing dispersal and degradation and avoiding dilution of the cytokine in the extracellular environment. Furthermore, TNFα (Hide et al., 2000) and proteases, such as caspase-1 and cathepsin D (Qu et al., 2009; Sarkar et al., 2009), which are synthesized and released upon P2X7 receptor activation, could be released via MVs together with IL-1β. Biogenesis of MVs may indeed serve as a mechanism of regulated assembly of multiple factors (Al-Nedawi et al., ) and reactive microglial cells may use MVs as complex “units” of information to mediate an integrated biological response. The presence of inflammatory cytokines and proteolytic agents might be important for the onset of detrimental effects of MVs toward degenerating cells, which are known to release large amounts of ATP, thereby promoting MV shedding. In this regard, monocytes-derived MVs, containing functional caspase-1, have been described to deliver a cell death message to vascular smooth muscle cells (Sarkar et al., 2009).
Role of Microglia-Derived MVs in Brain Inflammation
Notably, besides inflammatory mediators and proteases, MVs shed upon P2X7-activation from monocytes and dendritic cells contains MHCII proteins (Qu et al., 2009). This suggests that MVs produced from reactive myeloid cells may provide an efficient route for rapid dissemination and presentation of antigens, as part of an adaptive immune response. Indeed it has been recently shown that MVs shed by macrophages upon P2X7 receptor activation propagate an inflammatory signal among peripheral immune cells (Thomas and Salter, 2010). In the same study, Thomas and Salter identified membrane phospholipids as the active components of MVs, responsible for upregulation of co-stimulatory receptors and cytokine secretion in non-primed macrophages, through a TLR4-dependent process (Thomas and Salter, 2010).
Consistent with a pro-inflammatory role of MVs shed upon P2X7 receptor activation our recent data indicate that microglia-derived MVs induce an immuno-stimulatory activity in recipient microglia, which upregulate the co-stimulatory molecule CD86 and express inflammatory genes in a dose dependent manner upon MV exposure (Verderio et al., 2012). The inflammatory reaction occurring in recipient microglia is associated to MV internalization and MVs-mediated transfer of mRNA codifying for IL-1β. However, it still unclear whether transfer of genetic information from MVs to target microglia contributes to the inflammatory response induced by MVs and further studies are required to identify the inflammatory component/s of MVs. Interestingly, we validated in vivo these results by demonstrating that MVs of microglial origin are detectable in the cerebrospinal fluids of rodents and that their concentration increases in the course of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE), a model of the prototypic neuroinflammatory disease multiple sclerosis (Verderio et al., 2012). We also found that injection of MVs into the brain of mice with subclinical EAE induces recruitment of inflammatory cells at the site of delivery, while A-SMase knock out mice, genetically impaired in MV production, are largely protected from EAE (Verderio et al., 2012). All together these data indicate that microglia-derived MVs act as amplifying agents of inflammation and identify MVs as a marker and therapeutic target of brain inflammation.
It should be noted, however, that MV shedding can also serve functions other than antigen dissemination and propagation of inflammation. Evidence from Di Virgilio’s group and our laboratory (Bianco et al., ; Pizzirani et al., 2007), by demonstrating the presence of P2X7 receptors on isolated vesicles, suggested that MV shedding could represent a defense strategy against apoptotic insults, produced by excessive or repetitive ATP stimulation. Removal of functional P2X7 receptors from the cell surface could facilitate cell survival and avoid P2X7-mediated apoptosis (Verderio and Matteoli, 2001).
Microglia-Derived MVs Enhance Excitatory Neurotransmission
Microvesicles however may play a functional role also in different scenarios. In a recent study we explored the potential of MVs produced by microglia to interact with neurons and to modulate neurotransmission (Antonucci et al., ). We found that MVs shed from the surface of microglia interact with the plasma membrane of neurons and enhance spontaneous and evoked excitatory transmission. Indeed analysis of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) in neurons acutely exposed to MVs revealed an increase in mEPSC frequency without changes in mEPSC amplitude and paired recording analysis showed an increase the amplitude of EPSCs (Figure 3). MVs mainly act on the presynaptic site of the excitatory synapse, by increasing the ready releasable pool of synaptic vesicles and enhancing release probability at hippocampal synapses. This was indicated by increased sucrose-evoked exocytosis and reduction of paired pulse ratio in synaptically connected neurons. Notably, we found that MVs influence neurotransmission by inducing sphingolipid metabolism in neurons (Figure 4). Direct measurements of sphingolipid metabolism revealed an increase in ceramide and sphingosine production from sphingomyelin in cultured neurons exposed to MVs while pharmacological or genetic inhibition of sphingosine synthesis strongly prevented the stimulatory activity of MVs. Interestingly, the use of empty MVs, depleted of their luminal content, indicated that the presynaptic effect of MVs depends on surface components. Consistent with previous evidence by Thomas and Salter (2010) which identified phospholipids of MV membrane as the active pro-inflammatory agent of the MVs, we found that the lipid fraction of MVs shed from microglia is responsible for the enhancement of excitatory neurotransmission. However, additional studies are required to identify the active lipid/s of MVs and to fully define the receptors involved in MV recognition and coupled to sphingolipid metabolism in neurons.
Figure 3
Figure 4
Is MVs-Dependent Stimulation of Exocytosis Good or Bad for Neurons?
This question remains still largely unsolved and we can only make some speculative considerations. Previous evidence indicated that ATP, the stimulus which triggers MV shedding, is a physiological gliotransmitter but also a typical danger signal, which accumulates in the extracellular microenvironment upon cell damage. The shedding process occurs more efficiently in reactive as compared to resting microglia (Bianco et al., ; Qu et al., 2009; Sarkar et al., 2009) and uncontrolled microglial activation is linked to neurotoxicity in a wide range of brain diseases. However there has been considerable debate as to whether the microglia response is good or bad for tissue protection and repair. Accumulating evidence indicates that microglial reaction may indeed support neurons by providing trophic factors, eliminating damaged cells (Olah et al., 2012), controlling neurogenesis (Butovsky et al., ) and synaptogenesis (Roumier et al., 2004), and monitoring the functional state of synapses (Wake et al., 2009).
Facilitation of exocytosis induced by microglia-derived MVs may represent a protective response of microglia, aimed at restoring neuronal activity upon functional deficit of synaptic transmission. Neurons constitutively release a number of “Off” signals capable of inhibiting microglia activation (Neumann et al., 1998; Mott et al., 2004; Biber et al., ). Thus reduction in secretion of “Off” signals at damaged synapses may favor the acquisition of reactive phenotype in surrounding microglia, and facilitate MV shedding to restore exocytosis. Alternatively, and more probably, MVs may impact neurotransmission in case of microglia overshooting. By causing overproduction of sphingolipids, MVs shed from reactive microglia may contribute to the excessive potentiation of excitatory transmission, which indeed occurs in neuroinflammatory and degenerative diseases (DeFelice et al., ; Busche et al., ; Centonze et al., ). Characterization of MV content in relation to the activation state of donor microglia may help deciphering the complex biological activity MVs may exert toward neurons either upon acute or chronic delivery in both physiological and pathological conditions.
Conclusion and Future Perspective
Similar to membrane vesicles released by most cells, MVs shed from the surface of microglia contain various bioactive molecules which modulate neuron functionality and also influence the activity of surrounding non-neuronal cells. MVs contain a pro-inflammatory signals, i.e., IL-1β together with proteases and MHCII protein, act as amplifiers of inflammatory signals between glial cells and stimulate excitatory neurotransmission. This evidence suggests that MVs may play a pathogenic role not only in neuroinflammatory diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, but also in degenerative brain diseases, like Alzheimer’s disease, where microglia is activated and IL-1β is implicated (Giulian et al., 1996; Lue et al., 2005). Hence, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in MV shedding and in the transfer of the inflammatory signals may help identifying a strategy to inhibit MV activity, which may be of therapeutic relevance for the treatment of inflammatory brain diseases. Few, important pieces of information are already available: we know the stimulus (ATP), the receptor (P2X7 receptor), and the key enzyme (acid sphingomyelinase) involved in regulated shedding of MVs from microglia. We can inhibit production of MVs with pharmacological and genetic tools and we can envisage a sorting mechanism for constituents of MVs which interact directly with the P2X7 receptor or indirectly through its signaling components. However, the molecular composition of microglia-derived vesicles remains largely to be defined and little information are available about possible changes of MV cargo in relation to the activation state of donor microglia. A detailed characterization of proteins, lipids, and genetic components sorted inside MVs may greatly help deciphering the message stored inside MVs and sent by resting or reactive microglia toward surrounding cells, including non-neuronal cells such as astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and other microglia. Also, the elucidation of intercellular trafficking of MVs and identification of ligand-receptor recognition events which mediate the specific interactions between MVs and target cells might facilitate the comprehension of the biological activity exerted by microglia-derived MVs toward distinct brain cells.
In vivo studies will greatly benefit from the creation of a mouse model, in which MV shedding can be inducible impaired, such as conditional A-SMase knock out mice. A further improvement would derive from selective and inducible inactivation of A-SMase in microglia as this would avoid the complex phenotype of currently available models, in which constitutive inactivation of the gene in all cells produces a phenotype similar to Niemann-Pick type A human disorder (Horinouchi et al., 1995; Otterbach and Stoffel, 1995). Furthermore the development of highly specific A-SMase inhibitors could reveal a therapeutic potential of MV shedding inhibitors in brain inflammation.
Statements
Acknowledgments
We thank Paola Viani and Martina Gabrielli (University of Milan) for helpful discussion. This study was supported in part by FISM 2010/R/39, Italian Ministry 2008XFMEA3, RS 2008 B45E11000030008 to Claudia Verderio, and CARIPLO 2008 3184 to Michela Matteoli.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
A-SMase, acid sphingomyelinase; CNS, central nervous system; ESCRT, endosomal sorting complex required for transport; MVs, microvesicles; MVBs, multi vesicular bodies; PS, phosphatidylserine; SM, sphingomyelin.
References
1
AlaisS.SimoesS.BaasD.LehmannS.RaposoG.DarlixJ. L.LeblancP. (2008). Mouse neuroblastoma cells release prion infectivity associated with exosomal vesicles. Biol. Cell100, 603–615.10.1042/BC20080025
2
Al-NedawiK.MeehanB.RakJ. (2009). Microvesicles: messengers and mediators of tumor progression. Cell Cycle8, 2014–2018.10.4161/cc.8.13.8988
3
AndreiC.DazziC.LottiL.TorrisiM. R.ChiminiG.RubartelliA. (1999). The secretory route of the leaderless protein interleukin 1beta involves exocytosis of endolysosome-related vesicles. Mol. Biol. Cell10, 1463–1475.
4
AntonucciF.TurolaE.RigantiL.CaleoM.GabrielliM.PerrottaC.NovellinoL.ClementiE.GiussaniP.VianiP.MatteoliM.VerderioC. (2012). Microvesicles released from microglia stimulate synaptic activity via enhanced sphingolipid metabolism. EMBO J.31, 1231–1240.10.1038/emboj.2011.489
5
BabstM. (2005). A protein’s final ESCRT. Traffic6, 2–9.10.1111/j.1600-0854.2004.00246.x
6
BakhtiM.WinterC.SimonsM. (2011). Inhibition of myelin membrane sheath formation by oligodendrocyte-derived exosome-like vesicles. J. Biol. Chem.286, 787–796.10.1074/jbc.M110.190009
7
BalcaitisS.WeinsteinJ. R.LiS.ChamberlainJ. S.MollerT. (2005). Lentiviral transduction of microglial cells. Glia50, 48–55.10.1002/glia.20146
8
BernimoulinM.WatersE. K.FoyM.SteeleB. M.SullivanM.FaletH.WalshM. T.BartenevaN.GengJ. G.HartwigJ. H.MaguireP. B.WagnerD. D. (2009). Differential stimulation of monocytic cells results in distinct populations of microparticles. J. Thromb. Haemost.7, 1019–1028.10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03434.x
9
BiancoF.PerrottaC.NovellinoL.FrancoliniM.RigantiL.MennaE.SagliettiL.SchuchmanE. H.FurlanR.ClementiE.MatteoliM.VerderioC. (2009). Acid sphingomyelinase activity triggers microparticle release from glial cells. EMBO J.28, 1043–1054.10.1038/emboj.2009.110
10
BiancoF.PravettoniE.ColomboA.SchenkU.MollerT.MatteoliM.VerderioC. (2005). Astrocyte-derived ATP induces vesicle shedding and IL-1 beta release from microglia. J. Immunol.174, 7268–7277.
11
BiberK.NeumannH.InoueK.BoddekeH. W. (2007). Neuronal “On” and “Off”’ signals control microglia. Trends Neurosci.30, 596–602.10.1016/j.tins.2007.08.007
12
BudagianV.BulanovaE.BrovkoL.OrinskaZ.FayadR.PausR.Bulfone-PausS. (2003). Signaling through P2X7 receptor in human T cells involves p56lck, MAP kinases, and transcription factors AP-1 and NF-kappa B. J. Biol. Chem.278, 1549–1560.10.1074/jbc.M206383200
13
BuscheM. A.EichhoffG.AdelsbergerH.AbramowskiD.WiederholdK. H.HaassC.StaufenbielM.KonnerthA.GaraschukO. (2008). Clusters of hyperactive neurons near amyloid plaques in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Science321, 1686–1689.10.1126/science.1162844
14
ButovskyO.ZivY.SchwartzA.LandaG.TalpalarA. E.PluchinoS.MartinoG.SchwartzM. (2006). Microglia activated by IL-4 or IFN-gamma differentially induce neurogenesis and oligodendrogenesis from adult stem/progenitor cells. Mol. Cell. Neurosci.31, 149–160.10.1016/j.mcn.2005.10.006
15
CentonzeD.MuzioL.RossiS.CavasinniF.De ChiaraV.BergamiA.MusellaA.D’AmelioM.CavallucciV.MartoranaA.BergamaschiA.CencioniM. T.DiamantiniA.ButtiE.ComiG.BernardiG.CecconiF.BattistiniL.FurlanR.MartinoG. (2009). Inflammation triggers synaptic alteration and degeneration in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neurosci.29, 3442–3452.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5804-08.2009
16
CerutiS.ColomboL.MagniG.ViganoF.BoccazziM.DeliM. A.SperlaghB.AbbracchioM. P.KittelA. (2011). Oxygen-glucose deprivation increases the enzymatic activity and the microvesicle-mediated release of ectonucleotidases in the cells composing the blood-brain barrier. Neurochem. Int.59, 259–271.10.1016/j.neuint.2011.05.013
17
ChahedS.LeroyerA. S.BenzerrougM.GaucherD.GeorgescuA.PicaudS.SilvestreJ. S.GaudricA.TedguiA.MassinP.BoulangerC. M. (2010). Increased vitreous shedding of microparticles in proliferative diabetic retinopathy stimulates endothelial proliferation. Diabetes59, 694–701.10.2337/db08-1524
18
ChangC. P.ZhaoJ.WiedmerT.SimsP. J. (1993). Contribution of platelet microparticle formation and granule secretion to the transmembrane migration of phosphatidylserine. J. Biol. Chem.268, 7171–7178.
19
ChenC.SkogJ.HsuC. H.LessardR. T.BalajL.WurdingerT.CarterB. S.BreakefieldX. O.TonerM.IrimiaD. (2010). Microfluidic isolation and transcriptome analysis of serum microvesicles. Lab Chip10, 505–511.10.1039/b921417h
20
CockcroftS.GompertsB. D. (1979). ATP induces nucleotide permeability in rat mast cells. Nature279, 541–542.10.1038/279541a0
21
CocucciE.MeldolesiJ. (2011). Ectosomes. Curr. Biol.21, R940–R941.10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.011
22
CocucciE.RacchettiG.MeldolesiJ. (2009). Shedding microvesicles: artefacts no more. Trends Cell Biol.19, 43–51.10.1016/j.tcb.2008.11.003
23
DariosF.WasserC.ShakirzyanovaA.GiniatullinA.GoodmanK.Munoz-BravoJ. L.RaingoJ.JorgacevskiJ.KreftM.ZorecR.RosaJ. M.GandiaL.GutiérrezL. M.BinzT.GiniatullinR.KavalaliE.T.DavletovB. (2009). Sphingosine facilitates SNARE complex assembly and activates synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Neuron62, 683–694.10.1016/j.neuron.2009.04.024
24
DavidS.KronerA. (2011). Repertoire of microglial and macrophage responses after spinal cord injury. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.12, 388–399.10.1038/nrn3053
25
Del CondeI.ShrimptonC. N.ThiagarajanP.LopezJ. A. (2005). Tissue-factor-bearing microvesicles arise from lipid rafts and fuse with activated platelets to initiate coagulation. Blood106, 1604–1611.10.1182/blood-2004-03-1095
26
De FeliceF. G.VelascoP. T.LambertM. P.ViolaK.FernandezS. J.FerreiraS. T.KleinW. L. (2007). Abeta oligomers induce neuronal oxidative stress through an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-dependent mechanism that is blocked by the Alzheimer drug memantine. J. Biol. Chem.282, 11590–11601.10.1074/jbc.M607483200
27
DenlingerL. C.FisetteP. L.SommerJ. A.WattersJ. J.PrabhuU.DubyakG. R.ProctorR. A.BerticsP. J. (2001). Cutting edge: the nucleotide receptor P2X7 contains multiple protein- and lipid-interaction motifs including a potential binding site for bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J. Immunol.167, 1871–1876.
28
DoeuvreL.PlawinskiL.TotiF.Angles-CanoE. (2009). Cell-derived microparticles: a new challenge in neuroscience. J. Neurochem.110, 457–468.10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06163.x
29
DragovicR. A.GardinerC.BrooksA. S.TannettaD. S.FergusonD. J.HoleP.CarrB.RedmanC. W.HarrisA. L.DobsonP. J.HarrisonP.SargentI. L. (2011). Sizing and phenotyping of cellular vesicles using nanoparticle tracking analysis. Nanomedicine7, 780–788.10.1016/j.nano.2011.04.003
30
DuanS.NearyJ. T. (2006). P2X(7) receptors: properties and relevance to CNS function. Glia54, 738–746.10.1002/glia.20397
31
DukersD. F.MeijP.VervoortM. B.VosW.ScheperR. J.MeijerC. J.BloemenaE.MiddeldorpJ. M. (2000). Direct immunosuppressive effects of EBV-encoded latent membrane protein 1. J. Immunol.165, 663–670.
32
FangY.WuN.GanX.YanW.MorrellJ. C.GouldS. J. (2007). Higher-order oligomerization targets plasma membrane proteins and HIV gag to exosomes. PLoS Biol.5, e158.10.1371/journal.pbio.0050158
33
FaureJ.LachenalG.CourtM.HirrlingerJ.Chatellard-CausseC.BlotB.GrangeJ.SchoehnG.GoldbergY.BoyerV.KirchhoffF.RaposoG.GarinJ.SadoulR. (2006). Exosomes are released by cultured cortical neurones. Mol. Cell. Neurosci.31, 642–648.10.1016/j.mcn.2005.12.003
34
FerrariD.ChiozziP.FalzoniS.Dal SusinoM.ColloG.BuellG.Di VirgilioF. (1997). ATP-mediated cytotoxicity in microglial cells. Neuropharmacology36, 1295–1301.10.1016/S0028-3908(97)00041-5
35
FerrariD.PizziraniC.AdinolfiE.LemoliR. M.CurtiA.IdzkoM.PantherE.Di VirgilioF. (2006). The P2X7 receptor: a key player in IL-1 processing and release. J. Immunol.176, 3877–3883.
36
FevrierB.ViletteD.ArcherF.LoewD.FaigleW.VidalM.LaudeH.RaposoG. (2004). Cells release prions in association with exosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.101, 9683–9688.10.1073/pnas.0308413101
37
FitznerD.SchnaarsM.Van RossumD.KrishnamoorthyG.DibajP.BakhtiM.RegenT.HanischU. K.SimonsM. (2011). Selective transfer of exosomes from oligodendrocytes to microglia by macropinocytosis. J. Cell Sci.124, 447–458.10.1242/jcs.074088
38
GanX.GouldS. J. (2011). Identification of an inhibitory budding signal that blocks the release of HIV particles and exosome/microvesicle proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell22, 817–830.10.1091/mbc.E10-07-0625
39
GhidoniR.PaterliniA.AlbertiniV.GlionnaM.MontiE.SchiaffonatiL.BenussiL.LevyE.BinettiG. (2011). Cystatin C is released in association with exosomes: a new tool of neuronal communication which is unbalanced in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging32, 1435–1442.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.08.013
40
GiulianD.HaverkampL. J.YuJ. H.KarshinW.TomD.LiJ.KirkpatrickJ.KuoL. M.RoherA. E. (1996). Specific domains of beta-amyloid from Alzheimer plaque elicit neuron killing in human microglia. J. Neurosci.16, 6021–6037.
41
GouldS. J.BoothA. M.HildrethJ. E. (2003). The Trojan exosome hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.100, 10592–10597.10.1073/pnas.1831413100
42
GrassmeH.JekleA.RiehleA.SchwarzH.BergerJ.SandhoffK.KolesnickR.GulbinsE. (2001). CD95 signaling via ceramide-rich membrane rafts. J. Biol. Chem.276, 20589–20596.10.1074/jbc.M101207200
43
GuesciniM.GenedaniS.StocchiV.AgnatiL. F. (2010). Astrocytes and glioblastoma cells release exosomes carrying mtDNA. J. Neural Transm.117, 1–4.10.1007/s00702-009-0288-8
44
GulbinsE.KolesnickR. (2003). Raft ceramide in molecular medicine. Oncogene22, 7070–7077.10.1038/sj.onc.1207146
45
HansonP. I.ShimS.MerrillS. A. (2009). Cell biology of the ESCRT machinery. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.21, 568–574.10.1016/j.ceb.2009.06.002
46
HideI.TanakaM.InoueA.NakajimaK.KohsakaS.InoueK.NakataY. (2000). Extracellular ATP triggers tumor necrosis factor-alpha release from rat microglia. J. Neurochem.75, 965–972.10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0750965.x
47
HogquistK. A.NettM. A.UnanueE. R.ChaplinD. D. (1991). Interleukin 1 is processed and released during apoptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.88, 8485–8489.10.1073/pnas.88.19.8485
48
HorinouchiK.ErlichS.PerlD. P.FerlinzK.BisgaierC. L.SandhoffK.DesnickR. J.StewartC. L.SchuchmanE. H. (1995). Acid sphingomyelinase deficient mice: a model of types A and B Niemann-Pick disease. Nat. Genet.10, 288–293.10.1038/ng0795-288
49
HorstmanL. L.JyW.MinagarA.BidotC. J.JimenezJ. J.AlexanderJ. S.AhnY. S. (2007). Cell-derived microparticles and exosomes in neuroinflammatory disorders. Int. Rev. Neurobiol.79, 227–268.10.1016/S0074-7742(07)79010-4
50
HugelB.MartinezM. C.KunzelmannC.FreyssinetJ. M. (2005). Membrane microparticles: two sides of the coin. Physiology20, 22–27.10.1152/physiol.00029.2004
51
KellerS.KonigA. K.MarmeF.RunzS.WolterinkS.KoensgenD.MusteaA.SehouliJ.AltevogtP. (2009). Systemic presence and tumor-growth promoting effect of ovarian carcinoma released exosomes. Cancer Lett.278, 73–81.10.1016/j.canlet.2008.12.028
52
KolotuevI.ApaydinA.LabouesseM. (2009). Secretion of Hedgehog-related peptides and WNT during Caenorhabditis elegans development. Traffic10, 803–810.10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00871.x
53
KorkutC.AtamanB.RamachandranP.AshleyJ.BarriaR.GherbesiN.BudnikV. (2009). Trans-synaptic transmission of vesicular Wnt signals through Evi/Wntless. Cell139, 393–404.10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.051
54
Kramer-AlbersE. M.BretzN.TenzerS.WintersteinC.MobiusW.BergerH.NaveK. A.SchildH.TrotterJ. (2007). Oligodendrocytes secrete exosomes containing major myelin and stress-protective proteins: trophic support for axons?Proteomics Clin. Appl. 1, 1446–1461.
55
LachenalG.Pernet-GallayK.ChivetM.HemmingF. J.BellyA.BodonG.BlotB.HaaseG.GoldbergY.SadoulR. (2011). Release of exosomes from differentiated neurons and its regulation by synaptic glutamatergic activity. Mol. Cell. Neurosci.46, 409–418.10.1016/j.mcn.2010.11.004
56
LeblancP.AlaisS.Porto-CarreiroI.LehmannS.GrassiJ.RaposoG.DarlixJ. L. (2006). Retrovirus infection strongly enhances scrapie infectivity release in cell culture. EMBO J.25, 2674–2685.10.1038/sj.emboj.7601162
57
LiegeoisS.BenedettoA.GarnierJ. M.SchwabY.LabouesseM. (2006). The V0-ATPase mediates apical secretion of exosomes containing Hedgehog-related proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Biol.173, 949–961.10.1083/jcb.200511072
58
LogozziM.De MilitoA.LuginiL.BorghiM.CalabroL.SpadaM.PerdicchioM.MarinoM. L.FedericiC.IessiE.BrambillaD.VenturiG.LozuponeF.SantinamiM.HuberV.MaioM.RivoltiniL.FaisS. (2009). High levels of exosomes expressing CD63 and caveolin-1 in plasma of melanoma patients. PLoS ONE4, e5219.10.1371/journal.pone.0005219
59
LueL. F.YanS. D.SternD. M.WalkerD. G. (2005). Preventing activation of receptor for advanced glycation endproducts in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Drug Targets CNS Neurol. Disord.4, 249–266.10.2174/1568007054038210
60
MacKenzieA.WilsonH. L.Kiss-TothE.DowerS. K.NorthR. A.SurprenantA. (2001). Rapid secretion of interleukin-1beta by microvesicle shedding. Immunity15, 825–835.10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00229-1
61
MantovaniA.LocatiM. (2009). Orchestration of macrophage polarization. Blood114, 3135–3136.10.1182/blood-2009-07-231795
62
MarchesiniN.HannunY. A. (2004). Acid and neutral sphingomyelinases: roles and mechanisms of regulation. Biochem. Cell Biol.82, 27–44.10.1139/o03-091
63
MatsuoH.ChevallierJ.MayranN.Le BlancI.FergusonC.FaureJ.BlancN. S.MatileS.DubochetJ.SadoulR.PartonR. G.VilboisF.GruenbergJ. (2004). Role of LBPA and Alix in multivesicular liposome formation and endosome organization. Science303, 531–534.10.1126/science.1092425
64
MorelliA.ChiozziP.ChiesaA.FerrariD.SanzJ. M.FalzoniS.PintonP.RizzutoR.OlsonM. F.Di VirgilioF. (2003). Extracellular ATP causes ROCK I-dependent bleb formation in P2X7-transfected HEK293 cells. Mol. Biol. Cell14, 2655–2664.10.1091/mbc.02-04-0061
65
MottR. T.Ait-GhezalaG.TownT.MoriT.VendrameM.ZengJ.EhrhartJ.MullanM.TanJ. (2004). Neuronal expression of CD22: novel mechanism for inhibiting microglial proinflammatory cytokine production. Glia46, 369–379.10.1002/glia.20009
66
Muralidharan-ChariV.ClancyJ.PlouC.RomaoM.ChavrierP.RaposoG.D’Souza-SchoreyC. (2009). ARF6-regulated shedding of tumor cell-derived plasma membrane microvesicles. Curr. Biol.19, 1875–1885.10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.059
67
NazarenkoI.RanaS.BaumannA.McalearJ.HellwigA.TrendelenburgM.LochnitG.PreissnerK. T.ZollerM. (2010). Cell surface tetraspanin Tspan8 contributes to molecular pathways of exosome-induced endothelial cell activation. Cancer Res.70, 1668–1678.10.1158/1538-7445.AM10-1668
68
NeufeldE. B.CooneyA. M.PithaJ.DawidowiczE. A.DwyerN. K.PentchevP. G.Blanchette-MackieE. J. (1996). Intracellular trafficking of cholesterol monitored with a cyclodextrin. J. Biol. Chem.271, 21604–21613.10.1074/jbc.271.35.21604
69
NeumannH.MisgeldT.MatsumuroK.WekerleH. (1998). Neurotrophins inhibit major histocompatibility class II inducibility of microglia: involvement of the p75 neurotrophin receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.95, 5779–5784.10.1073/pnas.95.10.5779
70
OlahM.AmorS.BrouwerN.VinetJ.EggenB.BiberK.BoddekeH. W. (2012). Identification of a microglia phenotype supportive of remyelination. Glia60, 306–321.10.1002/glia.21251
71
OtterbachB.StoffelW. (1995). Acid sphingomyelinase-deficient mice mimic the neurovisceral form of human lysosomal storage disease (Niemann-Pick disease). Cell81, 1053–1061.10.1016/S0092-8674(05)80010-8
72
PapE.PallingerE.PasztoiM.FalusA. (2009). Highlights of a new type of intercellular communication: microvesicle-based information transfer. Inflamm. Res.58, 1–8.10.1007/s00011-009-0641-2
73
PerrottaC.BizzozeroL.CazzatoD.MorlacchiS.AssiE.SimbariF.ZhangY.GulbinsE.BassiM. T.RosaP.ClementiE. (2010). Syntaxin 4 is required for acid sphingomyelinase activity and apoptotic function. J. Biol. Chem.285, 40240–40251.10.1074/jbc.M110.139287
74
PiccinA.MurphyW. G.SmithO. P. (2007). Circulating microparticles: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Blood Rev.21, 157–171.10.1016/j.blre.2006.09.001
75
PizziraniC.FerrariD.ChiozziP.AdinolfiE.SandonaD.SavaglioE.Di VirgilioF. (2007). Stimulation of P2 receptors causes release of IL-1beta-loaded microvesicles from human dendritic cells. Blood109, 3856–3864.10.1182/blood-2005-06-031377
76
PotolicchioI.CarvenG. J.XuX.StippC.RieseR. J.SternL. J.SantambrogioL. (2005). Proteomic analysis of microglia-derived exosomes: metabolic role of the aminopeptidase CD13 in neuropeptide catabolism. J. Immunol.175, 2237–2243.
77
ProiaP.SchieraG.MineoM.IngrassiaA. M.SantoroG.SavettieriG.Di LiegroI. (2008). Astrocytes shed extracellular vesicles that contain fibroblast growth factor-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor. Int. J. Mol. Med.21, 63–67.
78
QuY.FranchiL.NunezG.DubyakG. R. (2007). Nonclassical IL-1 beta secretion stimulated by P2X7 receptors is dependent on inflammasome activation and correlated with exosome release in murine macrophages. J. Immunol.179, 1913–1925.
79
QuY.RamachandraL.MohrS.FranchiL.HardingC. V.NunezG.DubyakG. R. (2009). P2X7 receptor-stimulated secretion of MHC class II-containing exosomes requires the ASC/NLRP3 inflammasome but is independent of caspase-1. J. Immunol.182, 5052–5062.10.4049/jimmunol.0802968
80
RansohoffR. M.CardonaA. E. (2010). The myeloid cells of the central nervous system parenchyma. Nature468, 253–262.10.1038/nature09615
81
RoumierA.BechadeC.PoncerJ. C.SmallaK. H.TomaselloE.VivierE.GundelfingerE. D.TrillerA.BessisA. (2004). Impaired synaptic function in the microglial KARAP/DAP12-deficient mouse. J. Neurosci.24, 11421–11428.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2251-04.2004
82
SadallahS.EkenC.SchifferliJ. A. (2011). Ectosomes as modulators of inflammation and immunity. Clin. Exp. Immunol.163, 26–32.10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04271.x
83
SaijoK.GlassC. K. (2011). Microglial cell origin and phenotypes in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol.11, 775–787.10.1038/nri3086
84
SarkarA.MitraS.MehtaS.RaicesR.WewersM. D. (2009). Monocyte derived microvesicles deliver a cell death message via encapsulated caspase-1. PLoS ONE4, e7140.10.1371/journal.pone.0007140
85
SbaiO.Ould-YahouiA.FerhatL.GueyeY.BernardA.CharratE.MehannaA.RissoJ. J.ChauvinJ. P.FenouilletE.RiveraS.KhrestchatiskyM. (2010). Differential vesicular distribution and trafficking of MMP-2, MMP-9, and their inhibitors in astrocytes. Glia58, 344–366.
86
SchieraG.ProiaP.AlbertiC.MineoM.SavettieriG.Di LiegroI. (2007). Neurons produce FGF2 and VEGF and secrete them at least in part by shedding extracellular vesicles. J. Cell. Mol. Med.11, 1384–1394.10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00100.x
87
ScoldingN. J.MorganB. P.HoustonW. A.LiningtonC.CampbellA. K.CompstonD. A. (1989). Vesicular removal by oligodendrocytes of membrane attack complexes formed by activated complement. Nature339, 620–622.10.1038/339620a0
88
SimonsK.IkonenE. (1997). Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature387, 569–572.10.1038/42408
89
SimonsM.RaposoG. (2009). Exosomes – vesicular carriers for intercellular communication. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.21, 575–581.10.1016/j.ceb.2009.03.007
90
SimsP. J.WiedmerT. (2001). Unraveling the mysteries of phospholipid scrambling. Thromb. Haemost.86, 266–275.
91
SlotteJ. P.HedstromG.RannstromS.EkmanS. (1989). Effects of sphingomyelin degradation on cell cholesterol oxidizability and steady-state distribution between the cell surface and the cell interior. Biochim. Biophys. Acta985, 90–96.10.1016/0005-2736(89)90108-9
92
SteinbergT. H.NewmanA. S.SwansonJ. A.SilversteinS. C. (1987). ATP4-permeabilizes the plasma membrane of mouse macrophages to fluorescent dyes. J. Biol. Chem.262, 8884–8888.
93
StraussK.GoebelC.RunzH.MobiusW.WeissS.FeussnerI.SimonsM.SchneiderA. (2010). Exosome secretion ameliorates lysosomal storage of cholesterol in Niemann-Pick type C disease. J. Biol. Chem.285, 26279–26288.10.1074/jbc.M110.134775
94
SubraC.LaulagnierK.PerretB.RecordM. (2007). Exosome lipidomics unravels lipid sorting at the level of multivesicular bodies. Biochimie89, 205–212.10.1016/j.biochi.2006.10.014
95
TamboliI. Y.BarthE.ChristianL.SiepmannM.KumarS.SinghS.TolksdorfK.HenekaM. T.LutjohannD.WunderlichP.WalterJ. (2010). Statins promote the degradation of extracellular amyloid {beta}-peptide by microglia via stimulation of exosome-associated insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) secretion. J. Biol. Chem.285, 37405–37414.10.1074/jbc.M110.149468
96
TaylorA. R.RobinsonM. B.GifondorwaD. J.TytellM.MilliganC. E. (2007). Regulation of heat shock protein 70 release in astrocytes: role of signaling kinases. Dev. Neurobiol.67, 1815–1829.10.1002/dneu.20559
97
TepperA. D.RuursP.WiedmerT.SimsP. J.BorstJ.Van BlitterswijkW. J. (2000). Sphingomyelin hydrolysis to ceramide during the execution phase of apoptosis results from phospholipid scrambling and alters cell-surface morphology. J. Cell Biol.150, 155–164.10.1083/jcb.150.1.155
98
TheryC.OstrowskiM.SeguraE. (2009). Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol.9, 581–593.10.1038/nri2567
99
ThomasL. M.SalterR. D. (2010). Activation of macrophages by P2X7-induced microvesicles from myeloid cells is mediated by phospholipids and is partially dependent on TLR4. J. Immunol.185, 3740–3749.10.4049/jimmunol.1001231
100
TrajkovicK.HsuC.ChiantiaS.RajendranL.WenzelD.WielandF.SchwilleP.BruggerB.SimonsM. (2008). Ceramide triggers budding of exosome vesicles into multivesicular endosomes. Science319, 1244–1247.10.1126/science.1153124
101
Van BlitterswijkW. J.De VeerG.KrolJ. H.EmmelotP. (1982). Comparative lipid analysis of purified plasma membranes and shed extracellular membrane vesicles from normal murine thymocytes and leukemic GRSL cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta688, 495–504.10.1016/0005-2736(82)90361-3
102
VellaL. J.GreenwoodD. L.CappaiR.ScheerlinckJ. P.HillA. F. (2008). Enrichment of prion protein in exosomes derived from ovine cerebral spinal fluid. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.124, 385–393.10.1016/j.vetimm.2008.04.002
103
VerderioC.MatteoliM. (2001). ATP mediates calcium signaling between astrocytes and microglial cells: modulation by IFN-gamma. J. Immunol.166, 6383–6391.
104
VerderioC.MuzioL.TurolaE.BergamiA.NovellinoL.RuffiniF.RigantiL.CorradiniI.FrancoliniM.GarzettiL.MaiorinoC.ServidaF.VercelliA.RoccaM.Dalla LiberaD.MartinelliV.ComiG.MartinoG.MatteoliM.FurlanR. (2012). Myeloid microvesicles are a marker and a therapeutic target for neuroinflammation. Ann. Neurol.10.1002/ana.23627
105
VerhoefP. A.EstacionM.SchillingW.DubyakG. R. (2003). P2 ( 7 receptor-dependent blebbing and the activation of Rho-effector kinases, caspases, and IL-1 beta release. J. Immunol.170, 5728–5738.
106
VisentinS.LeviG. (1997). Protein kinase C involvement in the resting and interferon-gamma-induced K+ channel profile of microglial cells. J. Neurosci. Res.47, 233–241.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19970201)47:3<233::AID-JNR1>3.0.CO;2-J
107
WakeH.MoorhouseA. J.JinnoS.KohsakaS.NabekuraJ. (2009). Resting microglia directly monitor the functional state of synapses in vivo and determine the fate of ischemic terminals. J. Neurosci.29, 3974–3980.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4363-08.2009
108
WangS.CescaF.LoersG.SchweizerM.BuckF.BenfenatiF.SchachnerM.KleeneR. (2011). Synapsin I is an oligomannose-carrying glycoprotein, acts as an oligomannose-binding lectin, and promotes neurite outgrowth and neuronal survival when released via glia-derived exosomes. J. Neurosci.31, 7275–7290.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1462-11.2011
109
WollertT.HurleyJ. H. (2010). Molecular mechanism of multivesicular body biogenesis by ESCRT complexes. Nature464, 864–869.10.1038/nature08849
110
WollertT.YangD.RenX.LeeH. H.ImY. J.HurleyJ. H. (2009). The ESCRT machinery at a glance. J. Cell Sci.122, 2163–2166.10.1242/jcs.029884
111
YuX.HarrisS. L.LevineA. J. (2006). The regulation of exosome secretion: a novel function of the p53 protein. Cancer Res.66, 4795–4801.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3390
112
YuX.RileyT.LevineA. J. (2009). The regulation of the endosomal compartment by p53 the tumor suppressor gene. FEBS J.276, 2201–2212.10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.06949.x
113
YuyamaK.SunH.MitsutakeS.IgarashiY. (2012). Sphingolipid-modulated exosome secretion promotes the clearance of amyloid-beta by microglia. J. Biol. Chem.287, 10977–10989.10.1074/jbc.M111.324616
114
ZwaalR. F.SchroitA. J. (1997). Pathophysiologic implications of membrane phospholipid asymmetry in blood cells. Blood89, 1121–1132.
Summary
Keywords
microvesicles, microglial cells, IL-beta, neuronal activity, brain inflammation
Citation
Turola E, Furlan R, Bianco F, Matteoli M and Verderio C (2012) Microglial Microvesicle Secretion and Intercellular Signaling. Front. Physio. 3:149. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00149
Received
15 February 2012
Accepted
02 May 2012
Published
22 May 2012
Volume
3 - 2012
Edited by
Mauro Maccarrone, University of Teramo, Italy
Reviewed by
Giuseppe Astarita, University California Irvine, USA; Maria Marino, University Rma Tre, Italy
Copyright
© 2012 Turola, Furlan, Bianco, Matteoli and Verderio.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited.
*Correspondence: Claudia Verderio, CNR Institute of Neuroscience, Via Vanvitelli 32, 20129 Milano, Italy. e-mail: c.verderio@in.cnr.it
This article was submitted to Frontiers in Membrane Physiology and Biophysics, a specialty of Frontiers in Physiology.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.