Abstract
Appropriate fetal growth relies upon adequate placental nutrient transfer. Birthweight:placental weight ratio (BW:PW ratio) is often used as a proxy for placental efficiency, defined as the grams of fetus produced per gram placenta. An elevated BW:PW ratio in an appropriately grown fetus (small placenta) is assumed to be due to up-regulated placental nutrient transfer capacity i.e., a higher nutrient net flux per gram placenta. In fetal growth restriction (FGR), where a fetus fails to achieve its genetically pre-determined growth potential, placental weight and BW:PW ratio are often reduced which may indicate a placenta that fails to adapt its nutrient transfer capacity to compensate for its small size. This review considers the literature on BW:PW ratio in both large cohort studies of normal pregnancies and those studies offering insight into the relationship between BW:PW ratio and outcome measures including stillbirth, FGR, and subsequent postnatal consequences. The core of this review is the question of whether BW:PW ratio is truly indicative of altered placental efficiency, and whether changes in BW:PW ratio reflect those placentas which adapt their nutrient transfer according to their size. We consider this question using data from mice and humans, focusing upon studies that have measured the activity of the well characterized placental system A amino acid transporter, both in uncomplicated pregnancies and in FGR. Evidence suggests that BW:PW ratio is reduced both in FGR and in pregnancies resulting in a small for gestational age (SGA, birthweight < 10th centile) infant but this effect is more pronounced earlier in gestation (<28 weeks). In mice, there is a clear association between increased BW:PW ratio and increased placental system A activity. Additionally, there is good evidence in wild-type mice that small placentas upregulate placental nutrient transfer to prevent fetal undergrowth. In humans, this association between BW:PW ratio and placental system A activity is less clear and is worthy of further consideration, both in terms of system A and other placental nutrient transfer processes. This knowledge would help decide the value of measuring BW:PW ratio in terms of determining the risk of poor health outcomes, both in the neonatal period and long term.
Introduction: birthweight:placental weight ratio and the importance of adequate placental nutrient transfer to the fetus
Appropriate nutrient provision to the fetus, via the placenta, is essential for optimal fetal growth. Placental dysfunction, and consequent reduced nutrient supply, is associated with fetal growth restriction (FGR), a condition in which the fetus fails to achieve its genetically pre-determined growth potential (Mahendran et al., 1993; Glazier et al., ; Baschat et al., ). The ability of the placenta to maintain adequate nutrient delivery to the fetus is determined by a number of factors including the total surface area of syncytiotrophoblast (transporting epithelium) available for exchange, and the abundance and activity of nutrient transporters [(Desforges and Sibley, ); placental nutrient transporter activity and expression is reviewed in detail elsewhere (Jones et al., ; Desforges and Sibley, ; Dilworth and Sibley, )].
There is substantial evidence from studies in animals that the placenta regulates its nutrient transfer efficiency by morphological and functional adaptations which result in optimal fetal growth (Coan et al., ; Fowden et al., ; Sandovici et al., 2012). Placental efficiency is commonly defined by birthweight:placental weight ratio (BW:PW ratio) i.e., the grams of fetus produced per gram placenta (Wilson and Ford, 2001). Placental efficiency thus acts as a proxy measure of how placental development/function has adapted to meet fetal nutritional requirements (Fowden et al., ). The morphological or functional placental adaptations (i.e., in nutrient transfer per gram placenta) can occur in response to either maternal or fetal cues that ultimately result in a change in placental efficiency (Fowden et al., ). It has been postulated that adaptations take place in order to maintain appropriate fetal growth, and that failure of placental adaptations may result in a fetus that is either too small or large with respect to its genetic growth potential (Sibley et al., 2010).
A pregnancy with a relatively large fetus, compared with the average fetal weight of the population, will have had a higher total net transfer of nutrients across the placenta over the course of gestation than the pregnancy with a relatively smaller fetus. An increase in placental efficiency, as evidenced by an increased BW:PW ratio, implies that nutrient transfer per gram placenta must have increased. Accordingly the reverse is true; a reduced BW:PW ratio suggests that nutrient transfer, per gram placenta, is reduced. Data from mouse studies suggest that this is indeed the case. In a wild-type (WT) mouse litter of normally grown fetuses near term, those fetuses with the lightest placentas within a litter are of an equivalent size to those from the heaviest placentas; accordingly the fetal:placental weight ratio (F:P ratio) is higher in the lightest placentas (Coan et al., ). Importantly, in these lightest placentas within the WT litter, with an increased F:P ratio and placental efficiency, placental nutrient transfer (glucose and methylaminoisobutyric acid, a marker of system A amino acid transport) per gram placenta, is indeed also increased (Coan et al., ). Thus, F:P ratio may be a useful predictor of those placentas that have adapted their nutrient transfer (per gram placenta). Additionally, it has been observed in a number of rodent models of FGR that F:P ratio is reduced (Jansson et al., ; Coan et al., , ; Kusinski et al., ), suggesting an inefficient placenta that failed to adapt its nutrient supply to meet the demands of the rapidly growing fetus and indeed, placental amino acid transport is reduced in all of these models (Aardema et al., ; Jansson et al., ; Coan et al., , ; Kusinski et al., ).
Less well understood is the association between placental efficiency, defined as above, and nutrient transfer in humans. Evidence showing that changes in BW:PW ratio were matched with similar alterations in placental nutrient transfer may help to identify those placentas adapting, or failing to adapt, their placental nutrient transfer according to fetal demand. This is important because, taking the example of FGR, a reduced BW:PW ratio may be indicative of inadequate placental nutrient transfer.
The review will consider two major themes. Firstly, in reviewing studies in women, we focus mainly upon large cohort studies measuring BW:PW ratio and offering insight into its relationship with outcome measures including stillbirth, abnormal fetal growth, and subsequent postnatal consequences. Secondly, this review will consider, in humans and mice, whether measures of placental nutrient transfer do in fact relate to measures of BW:PW ratio. As part of this, published data from our own in vitro studies of placental nutrient transfer in human will be collated and compared with other reported data in both the mouse and human, focusing on the extensively studied system A amino acid transporter system. Our goal is to help to ascertain whether BW:PW ratio is a fair proxy for placental efficiency in terms of nutrient transfer in human pregnancy and whether large deviations in BW:PW ratio, and particularly a reduced BW:PW ratio, may indicate those pregnancies with a failing placenta. It is these pregnancies that would likely benefit most from extra antenatal surveillance and therapeutic intervention in the future, particularly in the prevention of stillbirth (Heazell et al., ).
Factors that influence BW:PW ratio and consequences of an altered BW:PW ratio for fetal wellbeing
Published BW:PW ratio measures are influenced by whether the placenta was weighed untrimmed or trimmed (removal of fetal cord and membranes) and this information is provided in the studies presented below. It is not intended for this review to be a systematic analysis of all studies quoting BW:PW ratio. Rather, the major focus is upon larger cohort studies that have examined important variables that may affect BW:PW ratio including sex, parity, ethnicity, and gestational age. Some studies present PW:BW ratio rather than BW:PW ratio but for consistency, all analysis and discussion of these studies has been related to BW:PW ratio.
There has been considerable interest in BW:PW ratio since the work of Barker and colleagues who suggested that those pregnancies with relatively large placentas relative to birthweight (low BW:PW ratio) are at increased risk of hypertension in adulthood (Barker et al., ). Similar findings have since been demonstrated in children; a low BW:PW ratio was associated with an increased risk of raised blood pressure (above 90th centile of blood pressures recorded in over 29,000 children) at 7-years of age (Hemachandra et al., ). Additionally, being in the lowest tertile of BW:PW ratio increases the relative risk of cardiovascular disease, and stroke in particular, in adulthood (Risnes et al., 2009). This leads to the suggestion that inefficient placentas, with supposed inadequate nutrient transfer, may be important in this programming of the fetus in utero, ultimately leading to increased risk of cardiovascular disease into adulthood.
BW:PW ratio increases across gestation as placental growth slows and fetal growth accelerates during the third trimester (Molteni et al., 1978). BW:PW ratio doubles from week 24 of pregnancy to term (38–40 weeks; Almog et al., ; Wallace et al., 2013). A number of large cohort studies have determined BW:PW ratio in pregnancies with normal outcome (Burkhardt et al., ; Almog et al., ; Wallace et al., 2013) and birthweight is 5–7 times greater than placental weight at term. In a comprehensive study based in Aberdeen, UK, Wallace et al. constructed placental weight (untrimmed) and BW:PW ratio centiles for over 89,000 pregnancies (Wallace et al., 2013). Separate centile charts were produced according to parity and fetal sex and split to account for gestational age (from 24 to 43 weeks). Placental weight and BW:PW ratio centiles were presented and showed that BW:PW ratio was higher in males but parity had no effect. This is in contrast to placental weight; multiparous women had significantly heavier placentas than nulliparous women. Additionally, the placentas of males were significantly heavier than those of females but this effect of sex was less marked than the effect of parity.
This splitting of BW:PW ratio by sex has also been documented in another large cohort study in Montreal, Canada (Almog et al., ) which calculated centiles similar to those in the study by Wallace et al.; the effects of parity were not reported in this study but centiles for placental weights (trimmed) were also produced for twin pregnancies. This study did not compare BW:PW ratio between males and females statistically but did show that the median placental weight at term was higher for males (679 g) than for females (668 g). Additionally, there was a correlation between gestational age and BW:PW ratio in both females and males. The authors concluded that these data should act as a reference tool for North American populations, but urged caution if used to compare against other cohorts, particularly when considering the different ethnicities that may be present within these different populations.
One of the largest studies quoting BW:PW ratio (untrimmed placental weight) examined over 500,000 singleton births in Norway (Haavaldsen et al., ); this encompassed all births between 1999 and 2008 and included confounders such as pre-eclampsia, diabetes, and those pregnancies conceived following assisted reproductive technology. This study considered the relative risk of fetal death in the lowest and highest quartiles of BW:PW ratio in both pre-term (23–36 weeks) and term (37–42 weeks) pregnancies. Values were adjusted for maternal characteristics including age, parity and smoking status and the other confounders detailed above. The study demonstrated elevated odds ratios (OR) for fetal death in both the lowest (OR 1.79, 95%CI 1.55–2.08) and highest (1.67, 1.44–1.94) BW:PW ratio quartiles in the pre-term group; in the term group, only the highest BW:PW ratio centile demonstrated an increased OR (1.76, 1.50–2.06) compared to the middle centiles. This suggests that, in this Norwegian population, a smaller placenta relative to fetal size, hypothesized to be a more efficient placenta in terms of nutrient transfer, was a risk factor for fetal death at term.
Williams and colleagues assessed BW:PW ratio in over 2500 pregnancies in Perth, Australia, and showed that both placental weight (untrimmed) and birthweight were better independent predictors of newborn morphometrics (such as abdominal and head circumference, ponderal index) than BW:PW ratio and thus concluded that BW:PW ratio was a poor proxy of fetal growth (Williams et al., 1997). This emphasizes a seemingly obvious, but important point, that in order to fully understand the significance of BW:PW ratio in relation to placental efficiency, it is essential to consider it in the context of the actual birthweight and placental weight (or birthweight/placental weight centile), since a normal BW:PW ratio could be the result of a birthweight and placental weight that are both normal, both high, or both low (Williams et al., 1997; Hutcheon et al., ). The authors also commented on the importance of accurate gestational ages when considering BW:PW ratio (Williams et al., 1997).
Shehata and colleagues studied 19,000 women in Canada delivering infants appropriate for gestational age (AGA) at term, grouped into centiles of BW:PW ratio. They demonstrated that a BW:PW ratio below the 10th centile presented with a greater risk of both NICU admission (OR 2.54, 2.01–3.20) and an apgar score below 7 (OR 1.82, 1.21–2.73) whilst a high (above 90th centile) BW:PW ratio appeared to reduce the risk of NICU admission (OR 0.59, 0.38–0.90; Shehata et al., 2011). This confirmed a study by Lao and Wong demonstrating again in AGA only, that infants with a low BW:PW ratio (greater than 1 SD below the mean of the population, untrimmed placentas) presented with an increased risk of a low apgar score (<7; Lao and Wong, ). These data suggest that, even in a seemingly lower risk AGA population, BW:PW ratio may be indicative of immediate and longer term health risks for an individual.
Individually, a number of these studies act as a useful reference tool for comparisons of BW:PW ratio against populations with similar characteristics (e.g., ethnicity). Collectively they demonstrate some of the factors that influence BW:PW ratio including gestational age, ethnicity, parity, and fetal sex, and begin to outline the links between an altered BW:PW ratio and risk of short and long-term health. The next section discusses the concept of placental adaptation and considers whether BW:PW ratio can be used to indicate those placentas that adapt nutrient transfer in relation to placental size.
Evidence of placental adaptation in normal pregnancy
It is well established that there is a positive correlation between placental weight and birthweight in human pregnancy (Winick et al., 1967; Crawford et al., ; Thame et al., 2001, 2004; see also Figure 1). This suggests that the size of the placenta dictates the size of the fetus, an assumption supported experimentally by studies in animals; it was shown over 30 years ago that sheep in which placental size was reduced by removal of endometrial caruncles had growth restricted lambs (Robinson et al., 1979; Harding et al., ). The correlation between placental weight and birthweight suggests that BW:PW ratio should be fairly constant between different women. Thus, large deviations in BW:PW ratio from the norm are indicative of either a baby that is relatively larger, or smaller, than would be expected from a placenta of a certain size, or conversely, a placenta that is relatively larger, or smaller than would be expected from a baby of a certain size. This may indicate those placentas that are adapting their nutrient supply to compensate for a relatively small or large placental size.
Figure 1
Placental adaptation has been the subject of previous reviews (Fowden et al.,
Some of the strongest evidence for placental adaptation and of a direct link between changes in BW:PW ratio comes from a study by Coan and colleagues in the mouse (Coan et al.,
To examine the evidence for functional adaptation within these placentas, Coan and colleagues assessed placental nutrient transfer between E16 and E19, focusing upon markers of passive permeability (14C-inulin), facilitated diffusion (14C-glucose), and secondary active transport (14C-MeAIB). MeAIB is a non-metabolizable substrate used as a proxy for the system A amino acid transporter. These studies were carried out in vivo following injection of radiolabeled tracers into the maternal circulation and subsequent fetal radiolabel counts, allowing calculation of unidirectional maternofetal clearance (Kmf). The authors found no difference in Kmf (per g placental tissue) of 14C- inulin or glucose between lightest and heaviest placentas at E16 but Kmf of 14C-MeAIB was significantly upregulated in the lightest placentas. At E19, Kmf of 14C- glucose and MeAIB were significantly increased in lightest vs. heaviest placentas whilst 14C−inulin demonstrated no difference. The authors concluded that there were morphological and functional changes within the placenta in response to changes in placental size and that these changes, hypothesized to be adaptations, may occur in response to fetal nutrient demand. These changes were largely morphological at E16 and functional at E19 and also suggest that large and small placentas adopt different strategies to maintain appropriate fetal growth. A study comparing lightest and heaviest placentas with those around mean weight within the same litter would help to corroborate this further.
These data provide evidence of placental adaptation, in terms of specific facets of nutrient transfer capacity, in normal mouse pregnancy. Studies specifically investigating this in human are largely limited to placental system A amino acid transporter activity, and will be discussed later in this review. Firstly, it is important to comment on the studies that have investigated BW:PW ratio in complications of pregnancy.
Birth weight:placental weight ratio and placental adaptation in complications of pregnancy
A significant reduction in BW:PW ratio may be indicative of placental dysfunction, the major cause of FGR, and a number of studies report reduced BW:PW ratio in FGR and SGA populations (Bortolus et al.,
Macdonald et al. suggested that BW:PW ratio may be a candidate to aid detection of SGA fetuses early in pregnancy; this would be particularly attractive in terms of identifying those pregnancies complicated by FGR, but would rely on accurate estimation of fetal and placental size following ultrasonography. The authors also suggest that this decreased BW:PW ratio in the SGA group early in gestation, when compared with the placental weight and birthweight centiles across gestation, is likely due to altered placental function rather than size, which again hints toward a pathological process (Macdonald et al.,
Lackman et al. demonstrated that babies below the 3rd centile of birthweights, classed as FGR in this study, had a significantly reduced BW:PW ratio, based upon untrimmed placental weights, compared with AGA pregnancies near term. This significant reduction was also seen in babies between the 3rd and 10th birthweight centiles, which was referred to as “borderline FGR” in this study (Lackman et al.,
Lao and colleagues examined BW:PW ratio in 470 pregnancies in Hong Kong and compared AGA, SGA, and LGA groups. They showed that BW:PW ratio was significantly lower in the SGA group compared with AGA with a trend toward an increased BW:PW ratio in the LGA group (Lao and Wong,
Manipulation of both fetal and placental growth in mice, for example by the production of genetic knock out or transgenic mice, results in alterations in F:P ratio. Mice with deletion of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS−∕−) gene have reduced uterine blood flow velocity and reduced fetal weight with no difference in placental weight; thus F:P ratio is reduced in this model of FGR (Kulandavelu et al.,
Placental adaptation in relation to overgrowth has also been studied in mice. Increasing levels of fetal and placental IGF2, by deleting the H19 region that incorporates the H19/Igf2 imprinting control region, resulted in placental and fetal overgrowth (Angiolini et al.,
BW:PW ratio has been measured in other complications of pregnancy in humans, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and pre-eclampsia (PE). Lao and colleagues performed a retrospective study on women with GDM or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), both of which were controlled through diet (Lao et al.,
Taken together, these studies suggest that there are deviations in BW:PW ratio when comparing complicated pregnancies with normal outcomes. In particular, the weight of evidence suggests that BW:PW ratio is reduced in both SGA and FGR, with the caveat that this is more profound earlier in gestation. To assess whether changes in BW:PW ratio, and thus placental efficiency, are mirrored by changes in placental nutrient transfer capacity in human pregnancy, as seen in the mouse, the following section considers associations between the activity of the placental system A amino acid transporter system and BW:PW ratio.
System a amino acid transporter activity in relation to BW:PW; microvillous plasma membrane vesicle studies
System A is a transporter system present on both the microvillous and basal plasma membranes of the syncytiotrophoblast of the placenta that transports small, neutral amino acids, such as alanine, serine, and glycine, in a sodium dependent manner (Mahendran et al., 1993; Glazier et al.,
Godfrey et al. (
In the study by Godfrey et al. (
System a amino acid transporter activity in relation to BW:PW; placental fragment studies in manchester
Since we have performed a number of recent studies investigating system A activity in placental villous fragments (Ditchfield et al.,
Placental villous fragments represent a different preparation to the studies considered above which employed MVM vesicles (Godfrey et al.,
Prior to carrying out this system A re-analysis, we also took the opportunity to examine a correlation between birthweight and placental weight from those pregnancies for which we had system A activity data (N = 60; Ditchfield et al.,
Figure 2

Frequency (%) distributions for trimmed placental weight (A), birthweight (B), BW:PW ratio (C), and placental system A activity (D) in an AGA population following collation of previously published data (Ditchfield et al.,
Within this population, system A activity was previously measured using placental villous fragments (Ditchfield et al.,
System A activity per mg of protein showed a significant positive correlation with placental weight (P < 0.05, Figure 3A). However, this correlation was not significant when placentas below the 10th and above the 90th centile (but still within the normal weight range) for placental weight were excluded (P = 0.49). This suggests that, even in an AGA population, it is placentas at the lower and upper ends of their weight range that are resulting in the extremes of system A activity. There was no correlation between birthweight and system A activity per mg protein (Figure 3B). When system A activity per mg protein was multiplied up to account for total placental weight, this was positively correlated with birthweight (P < 0.01) consistent with the important role of system A in supporting fetal growth. The lack of correlation between system A activity per mg protein and birthweight supports the data of Harrington and colleagues who measured system A activity in MVM vesicle preparations (Harrington et al.,
Figure 3

Correlations of system A activity (pmol/mg protein) vs. trimmed placental weight (A), birthweight (B), and BW:PW ratio (C). Data is collated from previously published studies within our laboratory (Ditchfield et al.,
What is clear is that previous data represented here differs from that expected from the UK MVM vesicle studies described above (Godfrey et al.,
Discussion
Data from the multiple studies described suggest that BW:PW ratio, whilst fairly consistent across normal populations, is altered in complications of pregnancy and particularly in SGA/FGR. However, this should be tempered by the fact that these differences are most obvious when examining multiple gestational time points and that this effect lessens, but still remains in a number of studies, at term. These data also reinforce the importance of accurately measuring trimmed placental weight in studies investigating placental function.
There are data suggesting that, in a non-pathological population, placentas adapt system A transporter activity according to placental and fetal size. These data are particularly compelling in mouse models where placental nutrient transfer capacity is positively related to F:P ratio, and thus placental efficiency. Following analysis of system A data from our previous studies (Ditchfield et al.,
An important point to make is that system A is only one of a large number of nutrient transporter systems within the placenta; further studies investigating other systems in detail will be necessary to gain a more complete picture regarding the presence or absence of placental adaptation, in terms of nutrient transport, in normal and pathological populations. These systems may include other amino acid transport systems shown to be dysregulated in FGR such as system L (Jansson et al.,
With regards to the investigation of the extremes of BW:PW ratio, an obvious but important point is that BW:PW ratio alone only offers limited insight; it is crucial to determine whether it is the placenta, or fetus, or both, that lie within the extremes (<10th, >90th). This affords greater insight into the likelihood of abnormal placental function in terms of nutrient transfer.
In terms of the ability of BW:PW ratio to detect those pregnancies at risk of complications, particularly FGR, the evidence suggests that low BW:PW ratio appears more predictive of abnormal fetal growth in pre-term populations and that its accuracy as a predictor at term may be diminished. However, in order for interventions in pre-term populations, there is a necessity for more accurate assessments of, in particular, placental size in utero (Higgins et al.,
BW:PW ratio has been mooted as a predictor of long-term health (Barker et al.,
In conclusion, the concept of BW:PW ratio as a marker of placental nutrient transfer efficiency is strongly supported by studies in mice, with clear evidence of placentas adapting their nutrient transfer capacity according to their size. In humans, the data are less conclusive in an AGA population with respect to the system A transporter and further studies are required that investigate a range of nutrients and transport systems. This knowledge would aid our understanding of whether placental adaptation, in terms of nutrient transfer, occurs in humans, and whether reduced placental nutrient transfer observed in FGR/SGA is indeed as a result of failed adaptation.
Funding
This work was supported by Tommy's - The Baby charity. MD is supported by a Career Development award from the Medical Research Council (Grant number MR/K024442/1).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Statements
Author contributions
CH and SL, MW, SG, and MD made substantial contributions to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data. CS, RJ, SG, and MD made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work. CH and MD drafted the work. SL, CS, RJ, MW, SG, and MD revised the work critically and provided important intellectual content. CH, SL, CS, RJ, MW, SG, and MD approved the final version to be published and agree to be accountable for ensuring the accuracy and integrity of any part of the work.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the support of our midwifery and clinical colleagues of St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, who were essential to the recruitment of patients and collection of placentas that produced the data collated in this review. We would also like to thank all of the women that donated their placentas in aid of this research.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AardemaM. W.OosterhofH.TimmerA.van RooyI.AarnoudseJ. G. (2001). Uterine artery Doppler flow and uteroplacental vascular pathology in normal pregnancies and pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia and small for gestational age fetuses. Placenta22, 405–411. 10.1053/plac.2001.0676
2
AlmogB.ShehataF.AljabriS.LevinI.Shalom-PazE.ShrimA. (2011). Placenta weight percentile curves for singleton and twins deliveries. Placenta32, 58–62. 10.1016/j.placenta.2010.10.008
3
AngioliniE.CoanP. M.SandoviciI.IwajomoO. H.PeckG.BurtonG. J.et al. (2011). Developmental adaptations to increased fetal nutrient demand in mouse genetic models of Igf2-mediated overgrowth. FASEB J.25, 1737–1745. 10.1096/fj.10-175273
4
BarkerD. J.BullA. R.OsmondC.SimmondsS. J. (1990). Fetal and placental size and risk of hypertension in adult life. BMJ301, 259–262. 10.1136/bmj.301.6746.259
5
BarkerD. J.GluckmanP. D.GodfreyK. M.HardingJ. E.OwensJ. A.RobinsonJ. S. (1993). Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in adult life. Lancet341, 938–941. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91224-A
6
BaschatA. A.GalanH. L.RossM. G.GabbeS. G. (2007). Intrauterine growth restriction, in Obstetrics Normal and Problem Pregnancies, eds GabbeS. G.NiebylJ. R.SimpsonJ. L. (Philadelphia, PA: Churchill LivingstoneElsevier), 771–814. 10.1016/B978-0-443-06930-7.50031-1
7
BortolusR.ChatenoudL.Di CintioE.RossiP.BenziG.SuraceM.et al. (1998). Placental ratio in pregnancies at different risk for intrauterine growth. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.80, 157–158. 10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00124-9
8
BreretonM. F.WareingM.JonesR. L.GreenwoodS. L. (2013). Characterisation of K+ channels in human fetoplacental vascular smooth muscle cells. PLoS ONE8:e57451. 10.1371/journal.pone.0057451
9
BurkhardtT.SchäfferL.SchneiderC.ZimmermannR.KurmanaviciusJ. (2006). Reference values for the weight of freshly delivered term placentas and for placental weight-birth weight ratios. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.128, 248–252. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.10.032
10
CoanP. M.AngioliniE.SandoviciI.BurtonG. J.ConstânciaM.FowdenA. L. (2008a). Adaptations in placental nutrient transfer capacity to meet fetal growth demands depend on placental size in mice. J. Physiol.586, 4567–4576. 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.156133
11
CoanP. M.FowdenA. L.ConstânciaM.Ferguson-SmithA. C.BurtonG. J.SibleyC. P. (2008b). Disproportional effects of Igf2 knockout on placental morphology and diffusional exchange characteristics in the mouse. J. Physiol.586, 5023–5032. 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.157313
12
CoanP. M.VaughanO. R.SekitaY.FinnS. L.BurtonG. J.ConstânciaM.et al. (2010). Adaptations in placental phenotype support fetal growth during undernutrition of pregnant mice. J. Physiol.588, 527–538. 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.181214
13
ColemanS. J.GerzaL.JonesC. J.SibleyC. P.AplinJ. D.HeazellA. E. (2013). Syncytial nuclear aggregates in normal placenta show increased nuclear condensation, but apoptosis and cytoskeletal redistribution are uncommon. Placenta34, 449–455. 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.02.007
14
ConstânciaM.AngioliniE.SandoviciI.SmithP.SmithR.KelseyG.et al. (2005). Adaptation of nutrient supply to fetal demand in the mouse involves interaction between the Igf2 gene and placental transporter systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.102, 19219–19224. 10.1073/pnas.0504468103
15
ConstânciaM.HembergerM.HughesJ.DeanW.Ferguson-SmithA.FundeleR.et al. (2002). Placental-specific IGF-II is a major modulator of placental and fetal growth. Nature417, 945–948. 10.1038/nature00819
16
CrawfordM. A.DoyleW.MeadowsN. (1987). Gender differences at birth and differences in fetal growth. Hum. Reprod.2, 517–520.
17
DesforgesM.LaceyH. A.GlazierJ. D.GreenwoodS. L.MynettK. J.SpeakeP. F.et al. (2006). SNAT4 isoform of system A amino acid transporter is expressed in human placenta. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.290, C305–C312. 10.1152/ajpcell.00258.2005
18
DesforgesM.SibleyC. P. (2010). Placental nutrient supply and fetal growth. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 54, 377–390. 10.1387/ijdb.082765md
19
DilworthM. R.KusinskiL. C.BakerB. C.RenshallL. J.GreenwoodS. L.SibleyC. P.et al. (2011). Defining fetal growth restriction in mice: a standardized and clinically relevant approach. Placenta32, 914–916. 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.08.007
20
DilworthM. R.KusinskiL. C.CowleyE.WardB. S.HusainS. M.ConstânciaM.et al. (2010). Placental-specific Igf2 knockout mice exhibit hypocalcemia and adaptive changes in placental calcium transport. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.107, 3894–3899. 10.1073/pnas.0911710107
21
DilworthM. R.SibleyC. P. (2013). Review: transport across the placenta of mice and women. Placenta34(Suppl.), S34–S39. 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.10.011
22
DitchfieldA. M.DesforgesM.MillsT. A.GlazierJ. D.WareingM.MynettK.et al. (2015). Maternal obesity is associated with a reduction in placental taurine transporter activity. Int. J. Obes.39, 557–564. 10.1038/ijo.2014.212
23
DitchfieldA. M.MillsT. A.WareingM.SibleyC. P.GreenwoodS. L. (2010). Raised maternal body mass index (BMI) differentially alters amino acid transporter activity in human placenta. Proc. Physiol. Soc.19:PC245.
24
FowdenA. L.Sferruzzi-PerriA. N.CoanP. M.ConstânciaM.BurtonG. J. (2009). Placental efficiency and adaptation: endocrine regulation. J. Physiol.587, 3459–3472. 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.173013
25
GlazierJ. D.CetinI.PeruginoG.RonzoniS.GreyA. M.MahendranD.et al. (1997). Association between the activity of the system A amino acid transporter in the microvillous plasma membrane of the human placenta and severity of fetal compromise in intrauterine growth restriction. Pediatr. Res.42, 514–519. 10.1203/00006450-199710000-00016
26
GlazierJ. D.SibleyC. P. (2006). In vitro methods for studying human placental amino acid transport: placental plasma membrane vesicles. Methods Mol. Med.122, 241–252. 10.1385/1-59259-989-3:241
27
GlazierJ. D.SibleyC. P.CarterA. M. (1996). Effect of fetal growth restriction on system A amino acid transporter activity in the maternal facing plasma membrane of rat syncytiotrophoblast. Pediatr. Res.40, 325–329.
28
GodfreyK. M.MatthewsN.GlazierJ.JacksonA.WilmanC.SibleyC. P. (1998). Neutral amino acid uptake by the microvillous plasma membrane of the human placenta is inversely related to fetal size at birth in normal pregnancy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.83, 3320–3326.
29
GodfreyK. M.RedmanC. W.BarkerD. J.OsmondC. (1991). The effect of maternal anaemia and iron deficiency on the ratio of fetal weight to placental weight. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.98, 886–891.
30
GreenwoodS. L.SibleyC. P. (2006). In vitro methods for studying human placental amino acid transport placental villous fragments. Methods Mol. Med.122, 253–264.
31
HaavaldsenC.SamuelsenS. O.EskildA. (2013). Fetal death and placental weight/birthweight ratio: a population study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.92, 583–590. 10.1111/aogs.12105
32
HardingJ. E.JonesC. T.RobinsonJ. S. (1985). Studies on experimental growth retardation in sheep. The effects of a small placenta in restricting transport to and growth of the fetus. J. Dev. Physiol.7, 427–442.
33
HarringtonB.GlazierJ.D'souzaS.SibleyC. (1999). System A amino acid transporter activity in human placental microvillous membrane vesicles in relation to various anthropometric measurements in appropriate and small for gestational age babies. Pediatr. Res.45, 810–814.
34
HaywardC. E.GreenwoodS. L.SibleyC. P.BakerP. N.ChallisJ. R.JonesR. L. (2012). Effect of maternal age and growth on placental nutrient transport: potential mechanisms for teenagers' predisposition to small-for-gestational-age birth?Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.302, E233–E242. 10.1152/ajpendo.00192.2011
35
HaywardC. E.HigginsL.CowleyE. J.GreenwoodS. L.MillsT. A.SibleyC. P.et al. (2013). Chorionic plate arterial function is altered in maternal obesity. Placenta34, 281–287. 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.01.001
36
HeazellA. E.WortonS. A.HigginsL. E.IngramE.JohnstoneE. D.JonesR. L.et al. (2015). IFPA gabor than award lecture: recognition of placental failure is key to saving babies' lives. Placenta36(Suppl. 1), S20–S28. 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.12.017
37
HeinonenS.TaipaleP.SaarikoskiS. (2001). Weights of placentae from small-for-gestational age infants revisited. Placenta22, 399–404. 10.1053/plac.2001.0630
38
HemachandraA. H.KlebanoffM. A.DugganA. K.HardyJ. B.FurthS. L. (2006). The association between intrauterine growth restriction in the full-term infant and high blood pressure at age 7 years: results from the Collaborative Perinatal Project. Int. J. Epidemiol.35, 871–877. 10.1093/ije/dyl080
39
HigginsL. E.SibleyC. P.HeazellA. E.JohnstoneE. D. (2013). Placental volume can be accurately measured using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound near term. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.98, A88. 10.1136/archdischild-2013-303966.304
40
HutcheonJ. A.McNamaraH.PlattR. W.BenjaminA.KramerM. S. (2012). Placental weight for gestational age and adverse perinatal outcomes. Obstet. Gynecol.119, 1251–1258. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318253d3df
41
ImadaS.TakagiK.KikuchiA.IshikawaK.TamaruS.HorikoshiT.et al. (2012). Birthweight placental weight ratio of appropriate-for-dates and light-for-dates infants in preterm delivery. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res.38, 122–129. 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01641.x
42
JanssonN.PetterssonJ.HaafizA.EricssonA.PalmbergI.TranbergM.et al. (2006). Down-regulation of placental transport of amino acids precedes the development of intrauterine growth restriction in rats fed a low protein diet. J. Physiol.576, 935–946. 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.550004
43
JanssonN.RosarioF. J.GaccioliF.LagerS.JonesH. N.RoosS.et al. (2013). Activation of placental mTOR signaling and amino acid transporters in obese women giving birth to large babies. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.98, 105–113. 10.1210/jc.2012-2667
44
JanssonT.EkstrandY.BjörnC.WennergrenM.PowellT. L. (2002b). Alterations in the activity of placental amino acid transporters in pregnancies complicated by diabetes. Diabetes51, 2214–2219. 10.2337/diabetes.51.7.2214
45
JanssonT.ScholtbachV.PowellT. L. (1998). Placental transport of leucine and lysine is reduced in intrauterine growth restriction. Pediatr. Res.44, 532–537.
46
JanssonT.YlvénK.WennergrenM.PowellT. L. (2002a). Glucose transport and system A activity in syncytiotrophoblast microvillous and basal plasma membranes in intrauterine growth restriction. Placenta23, 392–399. 10.1053/plac.2002.0826
47
JonesH. N.PowellT. L.JanssonT. (2007). Regulation of placental nutrient transport–a review. Placenta28, 763–774. 10.1016/j.placenta.2007.05.002
48
JonesS.BischofH.LangI.DesoyeG.GreenwoodS. L.JohnstoneE. D.et al. (2015). Dysregulated flow-mediated vasodilatation in the human placenta in fetal growth restriction. J. Physiol.593, 3077–3092. 10.1113/JP270495
49
KimH. S.ChoS. H.KwonH. S.SohnI. S.HwangH. S. (2014). The significance of placental ratios in pregnancies complicated by small for gestational age, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol Sci57, 358–366. 10.5468/ogs.2014.57.5.358
50
KulandaveluS.WhiteleyK. J.QuD.MuJ.BainbridgeS. A.AdamsonS. L. (2012). Endothelial nitric oxide synthase deficiency reduces uterine blood flow, spiral artery elongation, and placental oxygenation in pregnant mice. Hypertension60, 231–238. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.187559
51
KusinskiL. C.StanleyJ. L.DilworthM. R.HirtC. J.AnderssonI. J.RenshallL. J.et al. (2012). eNOS knockout mouse as a model of fetal growth restriction with an impaired uterine artery function and placental transport phenotype. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.303, R86–R93. 10.1152/ajpregu.00600.2011
52
LackmanF.CapewellV.GagnonR.RichardsonB. (2001). Fetal umbilical cord oxygen values and birth to placental weight ratio in relation to size at birth. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.185, 674–682. 10.1067/mob.2001.116686
53
LaoT. T.LeeC. P.WongW. M. (1997). Placental weight to birthweight ratio is increased in mild gestational glucose intolerance. Placenta18, 227–230.
54
LaoT. T.WongW. (1999). The neonatal implications of a high placental ratio in small-for-gestational age infants. Placenta20, 723–726.
55
LaoT. T.WongW. M. (1996). Placental ratio and intrauterine growth retardation. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.103, 924–926.
56
LaoT. T.WongW. M. (2001). Implications of a high placental ratio in pregnancies with appropriate-for-gestational age neonates. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest.52, 34–37. 10.1159/000052937
57
LeanS. L.HeazellA. E.Boscolo-RyanJ.PeacockL.MillsT. A.JonesR. L. (2014). Does altered placental morphology and function explain increased incidence of poor pregnancy outcome in advanced maternal age?Placenta35, A77. 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.06.247
58
LurieS.FeinsteinM.MametY. (1999). Human fetal-placental weight ratio in normal singleton near-term pregnancies. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest.48, 155–157.
59
MacdonaldE. M.KovalJ. J.NataleR.RegnaultT.CampbellM. K. (2014a). Population-based placental weight ratio distributions. Int. J. Pediatr.2014:291846. 10.1155/2014/291846
60
MacdonaldE. M.NataleR.RegnaultT. R.KovalJ. J.CampbellM. K. (2014b). Obstetric conditions and the placental weight ratio. Placenta35, 582–586. 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.04.019
61
MackenzieB.EricksonJ. D. (2004). Sodium-coupled neutral amino acid (System N/A) transporters of the SLC38 gene family. Pflugers Arch.447, 784–795. 10.1007/s00424-003-1117-9
62
MahendranD.DonnaiP.GlazierJ. D.D'souzaS. W.BoydR. D.SibleyC. P. (1993). Amino acid (system A) transporter activity in microvillous membrane vesicles from the placentas of appropriate and small for gestational age babies. Pediatr. Res.34, 661–665. 10.1203/00006450-199311000-00019
63
MalandroM. S.BeveridgeM. J.KilbergM. S.NovakD. A. (1996). Effect of low-protein diet-induced intrauterine growth retardation on rat placental amino acid transport. Am. J. Physiol.271, C295–C303.
64
MillsT. A.GreenwoodS. L.DevlinG.ShweikhY.RobinsonM.CowleyE.et al. (2015). Activation of KV7 channels stimulates vasodilatation of human placental chorionic plate arteries. Placenta36, 638–644. 10.1016/j.placenta.2015.03.007
65
MolteniR. A.StysS. J.BattagliaF. C. (1978). Relationship of fetal and placental weight in human beings: fetal/placental weight ratios at various gestational ages and birth weight distributions. J. Reprod. Med.21, 327–334.
66
RisnesK. R.RomundstadP. R.NilsenT. I.EskildA.VattenL. J. (2009). Placental weight relative to birth weight and long-term cardiovascular mortality: findings from a cohort of 31,307 men and women. Am. J. Epidemiol.170, 622–631. 10.1093/aje/kwp182
67
RobinsonJ. S.KingstonE. J.JonesC. T.ThorburnG. D. (1979). Studies on experimental growth retardation in sheep. The effect of removal of a endometrial caruncles on fetal size and metabolism. J. Dev. Physiol.1, 379–398.
68
RoosS.JanssonN.PalmbergI.SäljöK.PowellT. L.JanssonT. (2007). Mammalian target of rapamycin in the human placenta regulates leucine transport and is down-regulated in restricted fetal growth. J. Physiol.582, 449–459. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.129676
69
RoosS.KanaiY.PrasadP. D.PowellT. L.JanssonT. (2009a). Regulation of placental amino acid transporter activity by mammalian target of rapamycin. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.296, C142–C150. 10.1152/ajpcell.00330.2008
70
RoosS.LagerlöfO.WennergrenM.PowellT. L.JanssonT. (2009b). Regulation of amino acid transporters by glucose and growth factors in cultured primary human trophoblast cells is mediated by mTOR signaling. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.297, C723–C731. 10.1152/ajpcell.00191.2009
71
SandoviciI.HoelleK.AngioliniE.ConstânciaM. (2012). Placental adaptations to the maternal-fetal environment: implications for fetal growth and developmental programming. Reprod. Biomed. Online25, 68–89. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.03.017
72
ShehataF.LevinI.ShrimA.AtaB.WeiszB.GamzuR.et al. (2011). Placenta/birthweight ratio and perinatal outcome: a retrospective cohort analysis. BJOG118, 741–747. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02892.x
73
ShibataE.HubelC. A.PowersR. W.von Versen-HoeynckF.GammillH.RajakumarA.et al. (2008). Placental system A amino acid transport is reduced in pregnancies with small for gestational age (SGA) infants but not in preeclampsia with SGA infants. Placenta29, 879–882. 10.1016/j.placenta.2008.07.001
74
SibleyC. P.BrownbillP.DilworthM.GlazierJ. D. (2010). Review: Adaptation in placental nutrient supply to meet fetal growth demand: implications for programming. Placenta31(Suppl.), S70–S74. 10.1016/j.placenta.2009.12.020
75
SibleyC. P.CoanP. M.Ferguson-SmithA. C.DeanW.HughesJ.SmithP.et al. (2004). Placental-specific insulin-like growth factor 2 (Igf2) regulates the diffusional exchange characteristics of the mouse placenta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.101, 8204–8208. 10.1073/pnas.0402508101
76
StanleyJ. L.AnderssonI. J.HirtC. J.MooreL.DilworthM. R.ChadeA. R.et al. (2012). Effect of the anti-oxidant tempol on fetal growth in a mouse model of fetal growth restriction. Biol. Reprod.87, 25, 21–28. 10.1095/biolreprod.111.096198
77
StridH.BuchtE.JanssonT.WennergrenM.PowellT. L. (2003). ATP dependent Ca2+ transport across basal membrane of human syncytiotrophoblast in pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction or diabetes. Placenta24, 445–452. 10.1053/plac.2002.0941
78
ThameM.OsmondC.BennettF.WilksR.ForresterT. (2004). Fetal growth is directly related to maternal anthropometry and placental volume. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr.58, 894–900. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601909
79
ThameM.OsmondC.WilksR.BennettF. I.ForresterT. E. (2001). Second-trimester placental volume and infant size at birth. Obstet. Gynecol.98, 279–283. 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01414-4
80
WallaceJ. M.BhattacharyaS.HorganG. W. (2013). Gestational age, gender and parity specific centile charts for placental weight for singleton deliveries in Aberdeen, UK. Placenta34, 269–274. 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.12.007
81
WilliamsL. A.EvansS. F.NewnhamJ. P. (1997). Prospective cohort study of factors influencing the relative weights of the placenta and the newborn infant. BMJ314, 1864–1868.
82
WilsonM. E.FordS. P. (2001). Comparative aspects of placental efficiency. Reprod. Suppl.58, 223–232.
83
WinickM.CosciaA.NobleA. (1967). Cellular growth in human placenta. I. Normal placental growth. Pediatrics39, 248–251.
Summary
Keywords
placenta, adaptation, birthweight, F:P ratio, FGR, nutrient transport
Citation
Hayward CE, Lean S, Sibley CP, Jones RL, Wareing M, Greenwood SL and Dilworth MR (2016) Placental Adaptation: What Can We Learn from Birthweight:Placental Weight Ratio?. Front. Physiol. 7:28. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00028
Received
12 November 2015
Accepted
18 January 2016
Published
05 February 2016
Volume
7 - 2016
Edited by
Amanda Sferruzzi-Perri, University of Cambridge, UK
Reviewed by
Keshari Thakali, Arkansas Children's Nutrition Center, USA; Rohan Lewis, University of Southampton, UK
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2016 Hayward, Lean, Sibley, Jones, Wareing, Greenwood and Dilworth.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mark R. Dilworth m.r.dilworth@manchester.ac.uk
This article was submitted to Vascular Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.