ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Remote Sens.
Sec. Microwave Remote Sensing
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frsen.2025.1613748
This article is part of the Research TopicRemote Sensing for Vegetation Water MonitoringView all articles
Bare Surface Soil Moisture and Surface Roughness Estimation Using Multi-band Multi-Polarization NISAR-like SAR Data
Provisionally accepted- 1Institut National de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement (INRAE), Paris, France
- 2AgroParisTech Institut des Sciences et Industries du Vivant et de L'environnement, Paris, Ile-de-France, France
- 3Institut de Recherche Pour le Développement (IRD), Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France
- 4Indian Space Research Organisation, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
- 5Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The upcoming NISAR Earth-observation satellite will utilize dual frequencies simultaneously, providing synthetic aperture radar (SAR) remote sensing data in both the L-band and S-band. With its ability to operate single-polarization, dual-polarization, and quad-polarization modes, NISAR will offer significant capabilities for land surface observation applications, particularly for estimating surface soil moisture (SSM) and surface roughness (Hrms). This study aims to demonstrate NISAR's future potential in SSM and Hrms estimation by evaluating the single (SP), double (DP) and quad (QP) polarization configurations. Noisy synthetic NISAR-like data was generated using the Dubois-B model for both S-and L-bands. The use of a priori information on the soil moisture was also examined for SSM and Hrms estimations. Various neural networks (NNs) were trained using the noisy synthetic dataset. Validation was performed on noisy synthetic data, as real NISAR data is not yet available. Out of the NISAR configurations tested, the QP configuration was shown to be the most performant, with RMSE on SSM estimation of 4.2 vol.%, for QP configuration compared to 5.1 and 8.2 vol.% for SP and DP configurations when not using a priori knowledge of soil moisture conditions. RMSE on Hrms was 0.3 cm for QP configuration, compared to 0.7 and 0.6 cm for SP and DP configurations. The QP was also shown to be more capable of mitigating the effect of the incidence angle on the estimation of SSM and Hrms compared to the two other configurations. Moreover, simultaneous use of S-and Lbands enhances SSM and Hrms estimation compared to using either of these frequency bands alone in single, dual, or quad-polarization configurations. Furthermore, using a priori knowledge of soil moisture conditions was successful in improving the estimation precision for SSM for all NISAR configurations. Notably, for QP configuration, RMSE on SSM estimation was 3.9 vol.% and 3.2 vol.% when a priori information on SSM was considered respectively in dry to slightly wet and very wet conditions. These findings demonstrate the high potential of the future NISAR sensor for estimating SSM and Hrms.
Keywords: soil moisture1, soil roughness2, SAR remote sensing3, neural networks4, soil moisture mapping5
Received: 17 Apr 2025; Accepted: 10 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Najem, Baghdadi, Bazzi, Zribi, Pandey and Muddu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Sami Najem, Institut National de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement (INRAE), Paris, France
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.