Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Stroke

Sec. Stroke in the Young

This article is part of the Research TopicChallenges in Pediatric Acute Stroke Systems of CareView all 4 articles

Striving toward Quality Metrics for Pediatric Stroke: Time from Door to Diagnosis

Provisionally accepted
Rachel  PearsonRachel Pearson1,2*Nancy  K. HillsNancy K. Hills3Kellie  BaconKellie Bacon1Shelby  K. SheltonShelby K. Shelton1Rowena  RoqueRowena Roque1Tatiana  MorenoTatiana Moreno1Maria  KuchherzskiMaria Kuchherzski3Carl  H. SchultzCarl H. Schultz2Theodore  HeymingTheodore Heyming1Christine  FoxChristine Fox3Heather  FullertonHeather Fullerton3
  • 1Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, United States
  • 2University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, United States
  • 3University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Most pediatric stroke survivors suffer long-term impairments. To minimize injury, it is essential to quickly restore perfusion to viable brain tissue. Minimizing time to stroke diagnosis requires recognition of possible stroke by prehospital and emergency providers, and rapid neuroimaging. While CT suffices for diagnosing hemorrhagic stroke, MRI is necessary to diagnose acute ischemic stroke (IS), contributing to diagnostic delays and potentially missed opportunities for intervention. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 1–14-year-olds with acute neurological symptoms presenting by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to the study institution from 1/2019-6/2023. We described patient characteristics and neuroimaging studies, then evaluated predictors of MRI acquisition and actionable findings, including stroke. To assess the generalizability of these data we analyzed a secondary retrospective cohort of all children admitted during this period with out-of-hospital strokes regardless of presentation modality (EMS, emergency department (ED) walk-in, and transfer). Results: Among 3,888 pediatric patients with acute neurological symptoms presenting via EMS, 695 (17.9%) had neuroimaging: CT only in 570 patients (14.7%); CT and MRI in 125 (3.2%). Median (IQR) times from EMS activation to neuroimaging were 2.29 (1.56, 3.21) hours for CT and 26.8 (16.3, 43.8) hours for MRI. An EMS primary impression of “stroke” was rare (n=13) but strongly predictive of imaging acquisition: all had CT and 11 had MRI. 31/125 patients with MRI had actionable MRIs, including 9 acute strokes. During the study period another 14 stroke patients presented as ED walk-ins. Median time from ED arrival to CT was 0.92 (0.47, 1.08) hours for EMS patients with hemorrhagic stroke and 5.69 (1.50, 9.76) hours for walk-ins; for MRI, median time was 4.15 (3.00, 5.31) hours for EMS patients with IS and 10.2 (1.99, 36.3) hours for walk-ins. Conclusion: Among children with acute neurological symptoms selected for neuroimaging, CT was the most common modality while MRIs were performed with a substantial time delay. While EMS providers rarely suspected stroke, their diagnosis impacted imaging decisions in the ED, suggesting a need to raise awareness among prehospital providers. To measure quality improvement in pediatric stroke, new pediatric-specific metrics like “door to diagnosis” time, should be further explored.

Keywords: Pediatric Stroke, prehospital / EMS, Stroke care pathways, acute stroke care, stroke diagnosis

Received: 03 Oct 2025; Accepted: 20 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Pearson, Hills, Bacon, Shelton, Roque, Moreno, Kuchherzski, Schultz, Heyming, Fox and Fullerton. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Rachel Pearson, rachel.pearson@choc.org

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.