Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Water

Sec. Water and Human Systems

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frwa.2025.1552646

This article is part of the Research TopicPluralizing Water Knowledge for Inclusive Water Governance: Meaning-making, Co-creation and TransdisciplinarityView all articles

"The water is murky, the water is not moving": Qualitative water quality assessment by citizen scientists

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Geography, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 2Department of History and Social Sciences Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia
  • 3Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Numerous studies have demonstrated that citizen science can provide valuable data on physical, chemical, and biological aspects of water quality. These studies mainly focused on quantitative methods. Qualitative approaches have been used to describe water quality conditions for much longer, but remain largely overlooked. The color, odor, and presence of aquatic vegetation or garbage influence human perceptions of river water quality, the use of the water, and thus the relation between humans and waterbodies. Yet, few studies have assessed how visual water quality indicators and local knowledge of water quality or sources of pollution can be used in citizen science projects, despite recent studies calling for greater attention to qualitative data sources. Qualitative data can enhance the interpretation of quantitative data and deepen the understanding of human-water relations. This paper evaluates qualitative water quality descriptors collected through the citizen science smartphone app CrowdWater and analyses how citizen scientists perceive and assess water quality in the app. Our analysis not only indicates that some citizen scientists already take quantitative physical-chemical measurements of water quality (even though this is not part of the app) but also that they frequently report their perception of water quality based on visual indicators and local knowledge. Our study makes a methodological contribution to traditional approaches in citizen science and water quality studies, highlighting the need to explore less frequently used methods and data sources and less frequently studied aspects of water quality.

Keywords: Water Quality, citizen science, Qualitative assessments, Local knowledge, perceptions

Received: 28 Dec 2024; Accepted: 07 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Blanco Ramírez, van Meerveld, Camargo and Seibert. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Sara Blanco Ramírez, Department of Geography, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.