ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Water
Sec. Water and Human Systems
This article is part of the Research TopicExpanding Sociohydrology: Embracing Spatial Heterogeneity and Emerging NexusesView all articles
Trade-offs in adaptation to water-related risks: Modelling how climate services can influence pathways to transformation
Provisionally accepted
- 1Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden
- 2Centrum for naturkatastrofslara, Uppsala, Sweden
- 3Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Instituut voor Milieuvraagstukken, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- 4Department of Environmental Engineering and Sustainable Infrastructure, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden
- 5Karolinska Institutet Institutionen for global folkhalsa, Stockholm, Sweden
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Climate services play a central role in adaptation strategies to water-related risks, yet the long-term implications of relying on different types of climate information remain poorly understood. This paper presents a system dynamics model that explores how short-term and long-term climate services influence adaptation trajectories balancing agricultural production and wealth generation with water management and ecosystem protection. We apply the model to a synthetic case study where water scarcity poses the main risk for agriculture, considering precipitation forecasts as the main climate service. Short-term climate services (e.g. sub-seasonal forecasts) prioritize immediate risks and can facilitate reactive adaptation, such as rapid reservoir expansion and agricultural intensification. Long-term climate services (e.g. climate projections), by contrast, can support strategic planning and promote transformative measures, such as ecological restoration. Our model shows trade-offs between rapid wealth generation and long-term sustainability. Scenarios dominated by short-term climate services lead to faster economic growth, but also frequent and prolonged water crises. In contrast, reliance on long-term climate services can help build resilience and prevent crisis, but lead to lower economic returns. Mixed scenarios can avoid the worst outcomes, though they remain unstable and highly sensitive to climatic variability and shocks. Under climate change, increased variability in water recharge amplifies the demand for reactive measures, reinforcing short-term feedbacks and amplifying the risk of maladaptation. These findings highlight the importance of providing adaptation planners with long-term climate services that support the development of sustainable options while reducing the pressure of immediate threats. The model offers a conceptual framework for anticipating maladaptive patterns and emphasizes the need to balance short-and long-term objectives in coping with climate change.
Keywords: adaptation, Climate services, maladaptation, socio-hydrology, System dynamcis, trade-offs
Received: 16 Sep 2025; Accepted: 19 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Biella, Mazzoleni, Brandimarte and Di Baldassarre. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Riccardo Biella
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.