ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Water
Sec. Water and Human Systems
This article is part of the Research TopicParticipatory and Just Governance: Empowering Local and Indigenous CommunitiesView all 5 articles
How Gentle Power Enables Community-Based Conservation: Hydrosocial Practices and Institutional Support in Tokyo's Satoyama
Provisionally accepted
- Sophia University, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Power dynamics significantly influence environmental governance outcomes, yet mechanisms between coercive top-down control and purely voluntary participation remain undertheorized. This study proposes "gentle power" as an analytical concept and examines its functions through a case study looking into 40 years of satoyama conservation in Tokyo's Zushi-Onoji area, employing document analysis and participant observation. Satoyama landscapes exemplify the hydrosocial cycle, where water physically connects forest-wetland-paddy mosaics while being shaped by generations of human management. Local water management and environmental maintenance (e.g., adjustments of paddy field water levels and temperatures) have sustained biodiversity by supporting the reproductive cycles of amphibians and insects, while mitigating methane emissions. Analysis reveals that gentle power enables institutional bricolage through three integrated functions: knowledge integration (legitimizing traditional ecological knowledge through demonstrated effectiveness), institutional transformation (achieving bottom-up policy change through strategic engagement with existing frameworks), and adaptive sustainability (maintaining conservation through flexible role adjustment amid demographic change). These findings suggest that gentle power offers an alternative pathway for community-based conservation, one grounded in mutual trust, demonstrated expertise, and collaborative learning.
Keywords: Adaptive governance, community-based conservation, environmental governance, Gentle power, Hydrosocial cycle, Satoyama, Social-ecological systems, traditional ecological knowledge
Received: 03 Dec 2025; Accepted: 16 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Sugiura. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Mikiko Sugiura
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.