Water is at the center of human development. It is a renewable resource unlike any other, being, among other things, essential and non-substitutable, fugitive and bulky, abundant but also scarce (). It exists as a liquid, gas and solid and functions in a complex system (). Its presence and its absence, seasonal and permanent, have shaped the world's societies and cultures. The ability to capture it and turn it toward particular ends laid the foundation for the rise and fall of civilizations (Solomon, ; ; ; ). This has been no less the case in Sub-Saharan Africa, where changing socio-political and socio-economic relations through time create the mosaic of developmental opportunities and challenges seen today.
Colonial and imperial practices, which often overlaid indigenous socio-ecological systems without completely displacing them, bequeathed to the continent a series of dualisms: the cohabitation of “foreign”—e.g., Dutch-Roman Law—and Indigenous legal and institutional arrangements; commercial plantation-style agriculture set alongside smallholder, livelihood-oriented, farm practices; the use of rivers and other natural landforms, including parks and protected areas, as political borders, often ignored by local custom and social practice; a built environment designed to extract wealth from the continent (including mines, railways, ports and coastal cities) and intra-African “informal” trade and systems of production. The continuing presence of all these practices places particular stress on water and related resources. Complicating matters are the impacts of climate change and population growth and movement in Sub-Saharan Africa.
According to the World Meteorological Organization (, p. 3), “the African continent continued to observe a warming trend 0.3 °C per decade slightly higher than the global average warming trend 0.20 °C per decade for the 1991–2023 period,” resulting in more extreme climate events (droughts/floods; heatwaves/wildfires), as well as significant climate-related impacts to agriculture and food security (). Sub-Saharan African states and people are particularly vulnerable due to a combination of high rates of poverty and relatively flat economic growth ().
In terms of population, Sub-Saharan Africa is predicted to increase from 1.4 billion to 2.4 billion people by 2050 and to 4 billion by 2100 (). Population growth is a two-sided phenomenon: positive in the sense that the “youth bulge” means the presence of tens of millions of dynamic and creative young people; negative in the sense that the lack of opportunity in rural and urban areas may lead to increased socio-ecological instability.
The adaptation to climate change by the people and countries in Africa hinges on managing shifting rainfall in the short, medium and long-term amidst escalating disputes related to water rights. Water governance has not to only coordinate supply and demand, but also manage competing claims across sectors and scales to manage conflicts and ensure sustainability. The knowledge we value is critical: do our conceptual lenses recognize legal and customary rights and historical inequities as well as the related land use issues? How do we collect the necessary information to guide our decisions? And who are “we”—remembering that questions of water access, use and management bring together people with highly varying needs and interests.
In this Research Topic we draw together a set of five papers that interrogate issues and questions of water rights and conflicts in Sub-Saharan Africa, with a focus on both surface and groundwater. The papers deploy different conceptual lenses and methodologies to better understand some of the key challenges of sustainable water resources management in Sub-Saharan Africa: two systematic literature reviews, one (Mutanda and Nhamo) focused on gender and water security, and a second (Damasco et al.) on the utility of the eco-profile approach to act as a guide for watershed management and planning. A third paper (Mndzebele) assesses the performance of institutional design in the transboundary context with a focus on the Southern African Development Community (SADC). A fourth (Mgala et al.) undertakes a ground-level case study to examine the possibility of improved groundwater access, use and management for livelihood security in the Kagera Sub-Basin in Tanzania; and a fifth paper (Phali et al.) deploys a PLS-SEM approach to examine the interrelationship among water security, conflict, participation and governance in smallholder irrigation schemes in the Kwa Zulu Natal region of South Africa.
Four of the five papers highlight the importance of good governance and effective institutional arrangements for sustainable, equitable, economically efficient water access, use and management. Whether this be at the level of the irrigation scheme, the sub-basin, a regional organization such as SADC, or concerning a cross-cutting issue such as gender, evidence shows that good governance correlates negatively with the likelihood of conflict in water resources. Put differently, and as shown in this Research Topic, the effective, inclusive and transparent management of water resources helps prevent disputes, foster cooperation, and improve water security (see also ).
All five papers show that data collection, knowledge creation, and mobilization are key to effective policy and practice. Where multi-dimensional analyses combine with continuous assessment (monitoring and evaluation) in a context of effective governance and management (e.g. River Basin Organizations, irrigation cooperatives) and sufficient human, finance and technical capacity, the likelihood of avoiding conflict and achieving positive outcomes through collaboration is enhanced (see also, ; ).
Access to safe water and sanitation is a human right (), but for many across Sub-Saharan Africa it is a right that is unrealized. Water needs vary dramatically across users and regions of Sub-Saharan Africa. Data and knowledge gaps must be bridged in the context of anthropogenic and climate changes. Institutional arrangements must be revised to ensure that all voices are heard, that all forms of knowledge are valued, that decision-making is transparent, and that conflict resolution mechanisms are in place.
Statements
Author contributions
LS: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. TN: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. KK: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. MM: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. JM: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
Bridgewater Associates (2024). Changing Sub-Saharan Africa's Growth Trajector. Westport, CT: Bridgewater.
2
DöringS.KimK. (2025). Streams of contestation, streams of cooperation: toward a research agenda on water and peace. Environ. Secur. 3. doi: 10.1177/27538796251390045
3
McIlwainL.BairdJ.BaldwinC. L.PickeringG. J.ManathungaC.SmithT. F. (2024). Understanding the complex power dynamics that shape collaboration and social learning in multi-stakeholder water governance. Ecol. Soc.29:31. doi: 10.5751/ES-15109-290331
4
Pahl-WostlC. (2007). Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour. Manag.21, 49–62. doi: 10.1007/s11269-006-9040-4
5
RippleW. J.WolfC.GreggJ. W.RockströmJ.NewsomeT. M.LawB. E.et al. (2023). The 2023 state of the climate report: entering uncharted territory. BioScience73, 841–850. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biad080
6
SavenijeH. H. G. (2002). Why water is not an ordinary good, or why the girl is special. Phys. Chem. Earth27, 741–744. doi: 10.1016/S1474-7065(02)00060-8
7
Solomon S. (2010) Water: The Epic Struggle for Wealth, Power and Civilization. New York, NY: HarperCollins..
8
SwatukL. A. (2019). “A political economy of water', in The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary International Political Economy, eds. T. M. Shaw, L. C. Mahrenbach, R. Modi, and X. Yi-chong (London; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan), 501–516.
9
SwatukL. A. (2021). “Global water crises and challenges for water security,” in Handbook of Security and the Environment, eds. A. Swain, J. Ojendal, and A. Jagerskog (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), 40–61.
10
United Nations (2022). World Population Prospects 2022. Summary of Results. New York, NY: United Nations.
11
United Nations General Assembly (2010). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 28 July 2010. 64/292. The Human Right to Water and Sanitation. Available online at: https://docs.un.org/en/A/RES/64/292 (Accessed January 11, 2026).
12
WittfogelK. (1957). Oriental Despotism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13
World Meteorological Organization (2024). State of the Climate in Africa 2023, WMO-1360. Geneva: WMO.
14
WorsterD. (1985). Rivers of Empire: Water, Aridity and the Growth of the American West.New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Summary
Keywords
conflict and cooperation, eco-profile approach, gender, groundwater, irrigation, transboundary waters, water governance
Citation
Swatuk LA, Nhiwatiwa T, Kujinga K, Motsholapheko M and Matanzima J (2026) Editorial: Water rights and conflicts in Sub-Saharan Africa. Front. Water 8:1788607. doi: 10.3389/frwa.2026.1788607
Received
15 January 2026
Revised
23 January 2026
Accepted
26 January 2026
Published
10 February 2026
Volume
8 - 2026
Edited and reviewed by
Saket Pande, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Swatuk, Nhiwatiwa, Kujinga, Motsholapheko and Matanzima.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Larry A. Swatuk, lswatuk@uwaterloo.ca
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.