Lipid and Lipoprotein Metabolism in Microglia

Abstract

Microglia, once viewed as static bystanders with limited homeostatic functions, are now considered key players in the development of neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases. Microglial activation is a salient feature of neuroinflammation involving a dynamic process that generates multitudinous microglial phenotypes that can respond to a variety of situational cues in the central nervous system. Recently, a flurry of single cell RNA-sequencing studies have defined microglial phenotypes in unprecedented detail, and have highlighted robust changes in the expression of genes involved in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Increased expression of genes such as Apolipoprotein E (ApoE), Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells 2 (TREM2) and Lipoprotein Lipase (LPL) in microglia during development, damage, and disease, suggest that increased lipid metabolism is needed to fuel protective cellular functions such as phagocytosis. This review describes our current understanding of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism in microglia, and highlights microglial lipid metabolism as a modifiable target for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease and multiple sclerosis.

Introduction

Microglia are functionally distinct brain-resident macrophages that are seeded developmentally and maintained by self-proliferation (Ajami et al., 2007; Alliot et al., 1991; Askew et al., 2017). Once considered static bystanders with limited homeostatic functions, it is now becoming increasingly clear that microglia interact with all CNS components and have a marked impact on brain health and disease (Li and Barres, 2018). Microglia are highly plastic and respond to a variety of environmental cues by switching to appropriate activation states. While some activation states are adaptive and contribute to homeostatic functions, others are maladaptive and associated with neuroinflammation. Microglial activation and dysfunction are salient features of neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases (NDs), such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and multiple sclerosis (MS) (Colonna and Butovsky, 2017). Thus, it has been increasingly recognized that understanding the heterogeneity of microglial activation in the context of disease may facilitate the design of therapeutics that dampen the detrimental effects of microglial activation, while augmenting the beneficial effects of “alternatively” activated microglia (Li and Barres, 2018).

Recently, several comprehensive single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNAseq) analyses of microglia ex vivo have defined the transcriptomic identities of microglia with temporal (Grabert et al., 2016; Hammond et al., 2019; Li et al., 2019), regional (Grabert et al., 2016; Hammond et al., 2019; Li et al., 2019), and disease state specificity (Hammond et al., 2019; Keren-Shaul et al., 2017; Mathys et al., 2017). Various clusters of microglia with similar gene expression profiles have been mapped to specific regions and developmental or disease stages. A striking feature of these studies is the identification of microglial clusters with common metabolic characteristics. For example, Keren-Shaul et al. (2017) used the 5XFAD murine model of AD to define Disease Associated Microglia (DAMs) that express a distinct set of genes associated with lipid and lipoprotein metabolism (e.g., Apolipoprotein E [ApoE], Lipoprotein Lipase [LPL], and Triggering Receptor Expressed On Myeloid Cells 2 [TREM2]) (Keren-Shaul et al., 2017). This transcriptional signature represents a preference for lipids as fuel substrates that fulfill the greater bioenergetics needs of activated microglia (Keren-Shaul et al., 2017). Interestingly, these DAMs bear a striking resemblance to microglial clusters observed during early postnatal life (P4/P5) (Hammond et al., 2019), and in proliferative-region-associated-microglia (PAMs), which reside in regions of the early postnatal brain with active gliogenesis and neurogenesis (Li et al., 2019). A similar signature is also observed in microglia of the demyelinating brain (Hammond et al., 2019), and in the later stages of a CK-p25 murine model of DNA damage and neurodegeneration (Mathys et al., 2017).

Even though these studies have varied in their experimental approach, they have repeatedly implicated consistent changes in microglial metabolism during microglial activation. These studies have reignited our interest in “immunometabolism,” particularly in the context of neurodegenerative disease (ND). Here, we review our current understanding of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism in microglia to identify potentially targetable metabolic processes, which may ameliorate detrimental microglial responses and help develop novel therapeutic interventions for ND and beyond.

Importance of Microglia in Brain Health and Disease

Development

Microglia represent 5 to 15% of the adult CNS cell population and constitute the largest population of immune cells in the brain. They play a major role in the development of the CNS, maintain homeostasis within the healthy brain, and can initiate, propagate, and/or resolve inflammatory responses. To understand how these cells are capable of such feats, it is important to understand the origin and cell lineage of microglia. Microglia originate from yolk sac erythromyeloid precursor cells in mice at embryonic day 7.5 (E7.5) (Alliot et al., 1991). These cells infiltrate both the neuro-epithelium and cephalic mesenchyme at days E8.5/E9.0 and undergo dramatic expansion until the second postnatal week (Alliot et al., 1991, 1999; Tambuyzer et al., 2009; Ginhoux et al., 2010; Mizutani et al., 2012; Crotti and Ransohoff, 2016). Infiltration into the CNS is not uniform, and location-dependent heterogeneity in density, morphology, and gene expression is observed (Lawson et al., 1990). Using scRNA-seq in conjunction with RNA immunohistochemistry (IHC) in situ across developmental time points, microglial heterogeneity within parenchyma, (PAM), and meninges, border-associated microglia (BAM), is now mapped into specific subpopulations by gene cluster (Goldmann et al., 2016; Prinz et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019; Ochocka et al., 2019; Van Hove et al., 2019). Although microglial ontogeny is mostly preserved across subpopulations, the region of the brain in which the microglia reside significantly affects the phenotype and response to their microenvironment (Grabert et al., 2016). At E9.5, yolk sac progenitors develop into embryonic microglia (Rosenbauer and Tenen, 2007). These embryonic microglia are a distinct tissue specific macrophage population, which is different from circulating myeloid cells. Specifically, erythromyeloid precursor cells develop into CD45⁺, c-kit^lo, C-X3-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 1 (CX3CR1)immature cells, when in turn mature into CD45⁺, c-kit^–, CX3CR1⁺, which invade the brain using specific metalloproteases (Kierdorf et al., 2013). Following infiltration, factors such as Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ), IL-34 and Colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R) are necessary for the terminal differentiation of resident microglia (Butovsky et al., 2014). Although it remains somewhat controversial, recent studies suggest that in addition to canonical, non-Hoxb8 expressing microglia that infiltrate the brain at E9.5, there is a “second wave” of yolk-sac progenitors that are greatly expanded in the fetal liver prior to infiltrating the brain at E12.5 (De et al., 2018). Importantly, this second wave of cells may give rise to microglia-like cells, with distinct characteristics such as expression of Membrane-spanning 4-domains subfamily A member 7 (Ms4a7) and ApoE (Bennett and Bennett, 2020).

At E11/E16, neural stem cells (NSCs) at the dorsoventral boundary begin a massive expansion and differentiate into neural progenitor cells (NPCs), oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs), and mature oligodendrocytes (OLs) (Naruse et al., 2017). Over half of these mature OLs eventually undergo apoptosis (Barres et al., 1992). Many of these mature apoptotic OLs are phagocytosed by an early phagocytic subset of PAM (Li et al., 2019), highlighting the role of microglia in primary myelination. In addition, a subtype of microglia associated with white matter and axon tracts express high levels of LPL and Secreted Phosphoprotein 1 (Spp1) (Hammond et al., 2019), which could potentially facilitate clearance of myelin-derived lipid debris. Chemokines such as chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1), expressed in high quantities by neurons, stimulate microglial migration (Harrison et al., 1998; Jakovcevski et al., 2009), potentially to sites with active myelinogenesis. It is thought that microglia regulate primary myelinogenesis through a critical source of neuroprotective Insulin growth factor 1 (IGF1), known to regulate OL function (Wlodarczyk et al., 2017). Mature OLs are lipid-rich, requiring cholesterol and both essential and non-essential fatty acids (FAs) to effectively produce myelin (Mathews and Appel, 2016; Dimas et al., 2019). Although astrocytes provide OLs with cholesterol via effluxed lipoprotein particles, OLs can also produce cholesterol de novo via Phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K)/(Akt)/(mTOR) signaling (Chen et al., 2013; Mathews and Appel, 2016). The precise role of microglia in OL lipid metabolism is unclear, however, studies outlined above suggest a key role in the phagocytosis of lipid-rich debris from myelin and apoptosed OPCs and OLs.

While recent studies have shown that microglia are extremely diverse during early development, it is clear that they become less heterogeneous during adulthood (Hammond et al., 2019). Nonetheless, the dynamic transcriptional signatures of microglia exposed to injury, aging or disease, suggest that the adult microglia are readily poised to adapt to challenges in the local environment.

Synaptic Pruning

It has been previously observed in healthy brain that so-called “resting microglia” are in fact very active. They are highly mobile and take, on average, a 5 min sample of one neuronal synapse per hour (Davalos et al., 2005; Nimmerjahn et al., 2005; Wake et al., 2009). Additionally, synapses in ischemic areas are turned over following microglial detection (Wake et al., 2009). This sampling of synapses hints at the possibility that microglia are involved in the crucial process of synaptic pruning. The expression of the chemokine fractalkine (CX3CL1), a strong microglial chemoattractant and whose receptor in the CNS is expressed solely in microglia, is up-regulated in neurons during development (Harrison et al., 1998; Jung et al., 2000; Cardona et al., 2006; Liang et al., 2009). Through GFP-labeling of microglia and immunohistochemistry against postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD95), a marker of postsynaptic density, stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy revealed colocalization of PSD95 and GFP. Moreover, electron microscopy of these microglia show the presence of both clathrin-coated and non-clathrin-coated vesicles containing PSD95 as well as Synaptosome Associated Protein 25 (SNAP25), a marker of presynaptic density (Paolicelli et al., 2011). These data strongly suggest that microglia are actively involved in synaptic pruning. A closer look at hippocampal synapses via light sheet fluorescence microscopy and 3D ultrastructural characterization using Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) found that microglia do not directly phagocytose entire synapses (Weinhard et al., 2018). Instead, they trogocytose—selective partial phagocytosis—the membranes of presynaptic boutons and axons without any evidence for elimination of dendritic spines (Weinhard et al., 2018). The exact mechanism of trogocytosis has yet to be elucidated.

Phagocytosis

Microglia play an important role as the immune effector cells of the central nervous system. In line with this role, microglia express many cell surface factors that are also expressed by peripheral myeloid cells and macrophages such as integrin’s, toll-like receptors, scavenger receptors, and TREM2 (Aldana, 2019). Although these similarities have made the isolated study of microglia somewhat challenging, there has been a concerted effort to define the characteristics that set microglia apart from other myeloid cells. For example, while microglia and bone marrow derived macrophages both express CD11B and CD45 (although high for macrophages and low for microglia), microglia express higher levels of Transmembrane Protein 119 (Tmem119), CX3CR1 and Solute Carrier Family 2 Member 5 (Slc2a5) (Haage et al., 2019). It is likely that this differential expression represents the homeostatic functions that are specific to microglia and not peripheral cells such as synaptic pruning, neuronal survival, and synaptogenesis (Bilimoria and Stevens, 2015). Such neuroprotective functions are largely due to the phagocytic nature of microglia (Janda et al., 2018). Microglia are highly efficient phagocytes that remove apoptotic or necrotic cells (Green et al., 2016), and unfolded proteins such as amyloid beta (Aβ) or neuromelanin. Engulfment of myelin debris is also a key function of microglial sub-populations associated with remyelination and repair (Olah et al., 2012). Furthermore, microglia are an important part of the innate immune system and are activated in response to infections in order to directly phagocytose potentially pathogenic microorganisms (Nau et al., 2014). Microglial phagocytosis initiates the adaptive arm of the immune system via antigen presentation (Litman et al., 2005). Overall, the immune functions of microglia showcase their plasticity and ability to respond to a wide variety of stimuli. However, the response can sometimes become chronic and maladaptive. This prolonged microglial activation is a salient feature of many NDs such as AD, Parkinson’s disease and MS.

Disease

Metabolic Disorders

Metabolic disorders such as obesity have implicated in the pathological activation of microglia largely due to an increase in systemic inflammation. For example, the leptin deficient mouse model of type 2 diabetes (db/db), shows increased inflammatory chemokine and cytokine expression in the CNS (Kumar et al., 2014). In addition, several studies have shown that exposure to a high-fat diet (HFD) can increase microglial activation, even without peripheral inflammation (Ziko et al., 2014; Kang et al., 2016). In fact, recent work as shown that only 3 days of HFD exposure is sufficient to promote gliosis in the hypothalamus (Thaler et al., 2012). Since microglia are seeded developmentally and are particularly long-lived, they are a potential conduit for the transmission of “developmentally programmed” dietary exposures. In support of this hypothesis, microglia in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus can be programmed to an active state following HFD exposure during very early life; a phenotype that persists into adulthood (Morari et al., 2014). It is likely that circulating inflammatory mediators and lipids and lipoproteins have greater penetrance to the hypothalamus than other regions of the brain, which may explain the rapid metabolic polarization of microglia in this region.

Schizophrenia

Dysregulation of synaptic pruning has been increasingly implicated in the pathophysiology of both NDs and psychiatric disorders. In schizophrenia (SZ), patients have decreased gray matter thickness and reduced overall brain volume (Ziermans et al., 2012; Cannon et al., 2015). This is correlative with a decrease in synaptic density (Glantz and Lewis, 2000; Glausier and Lewis, 2013). To study this phenomenon, peripheral monocytes were induced into a validated microglia-like (iMG) cell culture model (Sellgren et al., 2019). Interestingly, iMGs from patients with SZ that are co-cultured with neurons display elevated internalization of PSD95 and SNAP25 as well as a utilization of the complement system, suggesting that microglial synaptic pruning is increased in patients with ongoing SZ (Sellgren et al., 2019). Microglia-mediated degradation of synapses is also seen in AD (Lacor et al., 2004; Chu et al., 2010; Schafer et al., 2012; Bialas and Stevens, 2013; Sekar et al., 2016; Panayiotou et al., 2017; Shi et al., 2017).

Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s Disease is the most common cause of dementia in the elderly, characterized by gradual memory loss and cognitive decline. The first phase of the disease involves the subclinical, gradual buildup of extra-cellular monomeric Aβ (mAβ) that coalesces into oligomers and eventually larger amyloid fibrils/plaques. This leads to the clinically significant second phase of the disease, involving the formation of hyperphosphorylated tau neurofibrillary tangles that are associated and the destruction of neurons; the hallmark of AD. Although cognitive decline occurs most drastically during the second phase, the gradual phase has also been implicated in the deterioration of synaptic density as a result of increased microglia-mediated synapse loss (Carroll, 2004; Gasque, 2004; Reichwald et al., 2009; Ransohoff, 2016). This is primarily facilitated by fibrillar Aβ (fAβ) and oligomeric Aβ (oAβ) aggregation onto neuronal post-synaptic terminals leading to complement deposition, microglial activation following synapse elimination and neural network dysfunction (Carroll, 2004; Gasque, 2004; Reichwald et al., 2009; Pan et al., 2011; Ransohoff, 2016). C3 receptor (CD11b/CD18) wielding microglia are the key mediators of Aβ clearance and show a differential phagocytic response depending on the morphology of the encountered Aβ (Carroll, 2004; Gasque, 2004; Reichwald et al., 2009; Ransohoff, 2016). Microglial exposure to fAβ induces a classical phagocytic response, which may help to facilitate the removal of fAβ and prevent plaque formation (Pan et al., 2011). In support, recent scRNA-seq studies in the 5XFAD model of AD have shown a profound increase in DAM, which have elevated expression of factors involved in lipid uptake and phagocytosis, likely in an attempt to clear fAβ at later stages of the disease (Keren-Shaul et al., 2017). Although the role of microglia in AD pathogenesis is a research-intensive area, whether specific microglial subpopulations contribute or prevent AD progression remains to be empirically determined.

The clearance of Aβ and its tendency to aggregate can be significantly altered by lipid and lipoprotein metabolism (see Figure 1A). Interestingly, Alois Alzheimer originally described an increased quantity of “lipoid granules” in the AD brain as a pathological hallmark, suggesting that irregular lipid and lipoprotein metabolism may be a driving factor (Foley, 2010). Increased free-cholesterol containing lipid rafts (Riddell et al., 2001; Ehehalt et al., 2003; Hattori et al., 2006; Marquer et al., 2011), which have been shown to increase Aβ aggregation (Wisniewski et al., 1994; Bhattacharyya and Kovacs, 2010; Bryleva et al., 2010) may be a potential underlying mechanism. Additionally, ApoE, the most abundant apolipoprotein in the CNS, is also known to modulate Aβ aggregation in an isoform dependent manner (LaDu et al., 1994). Furthermore, gangliosides (which contain ceramide) within Aβ aggregates may contribute to the persistence of amyloid plaques by evading microglial detection via their interaction with sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin (siglec-11), a negative immune receptor (Salminen and Kaarniranta, 2009). There is an increasing focus toward microglia-mediated lipid and lipoprotein metabolism in the brain and their effects on systemic and neuroinflammatory diseases (Di Paolo and Kim, 2011; Bruce et al., 2017; Reale and Sanchez-Ramon, 2017; Xicoy et al., 2019).

FIGURE 1

Multiple Sclerosis

In progressive forms of MS, the progression of chronically active demyelination lesions leads to worsening disability (Absinta et al., 2019). Within these lesions, myelin, which is composed mostly of lipid, is destroyed by microglia and lipid-laden infiltrating macrophages amongst other immune cells (Raine et al., 1981). It is here that lipid metabolism is most crucial in the modulation of disease. The presence of myelin debris itself is known to cause a sustained inflammatory response (Clarner et al., 2012; Cantuti-Castelvetri et al., 2018; Kopper and Gensel, 2018). Additionally, cholesterol-breakdown products are significantly higher within the brain and CSF of these patients. 7-ketocholesterol (7KC) is among these products and is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and attenuated lipid processing through FA oxidation (FAO) in OLs (Diestel et al., 2003; Leoni et al., 2017). In microglia, 7KC rapidly enters the nucleus and activates poly (ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP)-1, which induces a pro-inflammatory phenotype (Diestel et al., 2003; Kauppinen and Swanson, 2005). In some ways this is helpful, as activated microglia are more mobile and significantly increase their phagocytic activity in order to clear debris effectively (Fu et al., 2014). However, a recent study has shown that as phagocytic microglia age they lose the capacity to effectively efflux cholesterol, form intracellular cholesterol crystals, and propagate a maladaptive pro-inflammatory response (Cantuti-Castelvetri et al., 2018) (see Figure 1B). In contrast, omega-3 (n-3) polyunsaturated FAs (PUFAs) have been shown to reduce inflammation and induce an anti-inflammatory phenotype within microglia (Hopperton et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2018; Layé et al., 2018). Similarly, an increased intake of total dietary PUFAs is associated with a reduced risk of developing MS (Bjornevik et al., 2017). In addition, we have previously shown that LPL, the rate-limiting enzyme in the hydrolysis of triglyceride (TG) rich lipoproteins, is associated with an anti-inflammatory microglial phenotype due to its complex role in lipid uptake and metabolic reprogramming (Bruce et al., 2018).

Metabolic Reprogramming in Macrophages and Microglia

It is well established that macrophages change their metabolic profile to meet the increased bioenergetic demands of activation. Although a similar “metabolic reprogramming” also occurs in microglia, our understanding of this process is less well understood. For this reason, it is useful to review the literature describing the interaction between metabolism and inflammation in macrophages to serve as a relative model for microglia. When macrophages are homeostatic, or quiescent, they catabolize various substrates (glucose, amino acids, fatty acids) to be utilized in the TCA cycle to produce electrons (carried in the form of NADH/FADH2). These electrons are then used during mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) to drive adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production (Mehta et al., 2017). In contrast, pro-inflammatory macrophages show a metabolic shift toward glycolysis and away from OXPHOS (Van den Bossche and Saraber, 2018). The metabolic preference for energy derived from glycolysis over OXPHOS in normoxic conditions is reminiscent of the metabolic profile of many types of tumors. In these tumor cells, glycolysis predominates despite sufficient oxygen for oxidative metabolism to proceed; a phenomenon first described by Otto Warburg in 1927, thus termed the “Warburg effect” (Warburg et al., 1927). In macrophages, metabolic polarization to a Warburg-like metabolism can follow exposure to a range of stimuli, including LPS, the toll-like receptor (TLR) 3 ligand poly(I:C), and type 1 interferon (IFN) (Kelly and O’Neill, 2015). It has been suggested that activated macrophages shift toward glycolytic metabolism to preserve the macromolecules that may be needed to synthesize new proteins required for a given activation state (Rambold and Pearce, 2018). For example, glucose metabolism feeds the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), which increases the production of purines and pyrimidines, important for biosynthesis in the activated cell. Increased flux through the PPP also provides NADPH for NADPH oxidase, which generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can be used as an anti-bacterial mechanism (West et al., 2011). It is also thought that the increase in glycolysis generates ATP quickly, and although inefficient in comparison to oxidative metabolism, provides the necessary energy to support cell activation in the shortest time frame. Importantly, recent studies using microglia isolated from 5XFAD mice have shown similar impairments in metabolism including shifts toward glycolysis, which can be reversed following INF-γ treatment (Baik et al., 2019). There are a number of mechanisms thought to contribute to the metabolic reprogramming of macrophages and microglia, although here we will focus on those involving alterations in lipid metabolism, there are several reviews that discuss the mechanisms in more detail (Kelly and O’Neill, 2015; Langston et al., 2017).

Macrophage lipid metabolism is profoundly altered during polarization. For example, following macrophage activation, the TCA cycle is interrupted and acetyl-CoA is shunted to the synthesis of lipid precursors for inflammatory mediators (Jha et al., 2015). Specifically, following intraperitoneal (IP) injection of LPS or zymosan (a ligand found on surface of yeast) there is a dramatic increase in the synthesis of cholesterol ester (CE) and FAs in peritoneal macrophages (Posokhova et al., 2008). Furthermore, activated macrophages take up significantly more native and acetylated low-density-lipoproteins (LDL), which contributes to CE synthesis, whereas non-acetylated LDL uptake is inhibitory to CE synthesis in control cells (Wang et al., 2007). In addition, LPS treatment leads to TG accumulation in macrophages, which is coupled with decreased FAO and TG lipolysis, without altered expression of intracellular lipases (Adipose triglyceride lipase [ATGL] and hormone sensitive lipase [HSL]) (Feingold et al., 2012). In contrast, ‘alternative activation’ of macrophages is associated with increased FAO, raising the possibility that controlling fatty acid metabolism may attenuate inappropriate activation (Namgaladze and Brune, 2016). Several targets have been identified that may control FA metabolism in the context of inflammation, with a particular emphasis on mitochondrial FAO. For example, promoting mitochondrial β-oxidation has been shown to attenuate endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress that can be induced by the saturated fatty acid (SFA) palmitate (C16:0) (Namgaladze et al., 2014). Conversely, knockdown, or pharmacological inhibition of mitochondrial FAO leads to exacerbated ER stress and inflammation in response to palmitate (Namgaladze et al., 2014). In support, over expression of a mutant from of Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase 1A (CPT1A) that is insensitive to malonyl-CoA inhibition (and thus shows enhanced mitochondrial FAO) prevents palmitate-induced inflammation, ER stress, and oxidative damage (Malandrino et al., 2015). While there may be deleterious effects of increased FAO, particularly in tissue-specific or hypoxic conditions, overall it has been suggested that a major consequence of increased macrophage FAO is a diversion of fatty acid flux away from the formation of FA metabolites that cause ER stress and are precursors for inflammatory mediators.

Until recently, our understanding of how microglial metabolism relates to activation and function has been somewhat extrapolated from the peripheral macrophage literature. However, recent scRNA-seq studies mentioned above have highlighted that microglial metabolism may be similarly altered in response to changing bioenergetics during the development of NDs. For example, several studies have highlighted the need for increased expression of genes associated with lipid metabolism (e.g., TREM2, LPL and ApoE) during development, damage and disease (Keren-Shaul et al., 2017; Hammond et al., 2019). While this suggests a need for increased FAO in these activation states, further studies are needed to empirically define the role of these factors in microglial lipid metabolism and inflammation, particularly in the context of ND. It is important to point out that while the metabolism of microglia may be similar to macrophages in many aspects, it is likely that access to limited metabolic substrates in the CNS (e.g., no very-low-density-lipoproteins [VLDL] or LDL) has led to the development of somewhat distinct metabolic profiles, that have not yet been clearly defined.

Fatty Acid Metabolism in Microglia

Overview

The brain’s dry weight is made up of about 50% lipid, most of which is comprised of myelin enriched white matter (Hamilton et al., 2007). Myelin is a specialized OL membrane that contains ∼43% phospholipid (PL), ∼28% glycosphingolipid, and ∼28% cholesterol of its total lipid content (Morell, 1999). PLs are derived from FAs in a biosynthetic pathway that is initiated by fatty acyl-CoA synthase, which combines a FA with acyl-coenzyme A (acyl-CoA) using ATP to create fatty acyl-CoA (Yamashita et al., 2014). Glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (GPAT) adds a glycerol backbone, creating a single-tailed lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) (Yamashita et al., 2014). CoA replenishes it’s acyl group from acyl-carnitine via the carnitine transport system within the mitochondria (Yamashita et al., 2014). Within the ER, LPA is further modulated to give rise to TGs, diacylglycerols (DAGs), and PLs (Yamashita et al., 2014). These PLs are transported through the Golgi, to other organelles, and to the polymorphic cell surface along with proteins, cholesterol, and other FA containing glycolipids (GLs). PLs are important for providing membrane integrity, lipid raft formation, signal transduction, providing curvature to the cell membrane, vesicle formation, apoptosis, and in the production of pro- or anti-inflammatory mediators. Moreover, they are becoming increasingly implicated in the pathophysiology of NDs.

Phospholipids

Phospholipids constitute 45% of the total dry weight of the brain, and are key to several pathways, such as the synthesis and turnover of neuronal and glial membranes and signaling. Since these processes are critical to CNS health, it is not surprising that there are substantial energy demands associated with PL metabolism, with 5% of the brains ATP being used for the turnover of 1,2-diacyl type PLs (Purdon et al., 2002). A number of reports have suggested that FAs and PLs are increased during pathological conditions such as inflammation, hypoxia and ischemia, and it is likely that this represents release of FAs from brain PLs, or indeed PLs from vital brain structures. For example, in individuals with PD, total serum PL levels are increased without any signs of cognitive impairment and positively correlate with the progression of their cognitive impairment (Li et al., 2015). This finding suggests that increased PL levels could be an early marker for PD onset and disease progression. Furthermore, the enzymes involved in synthesizing phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) are increased in the substantia nigra of PD patients (Ross et al., 2001). The increase in total serum PL may indicate cell membrane damage in the substantia nigra, which triggers a compensatory increase in PS, PE, and PC synthesis. Interestingly, while total serum PL is increased, PS 40:4 is decreased (Zhang et al., 2017). In non-apoptotic cells, PS is asymmetrically present within the inner layer of the cell membrane. However, in PD, apoptotic neurons extrovert PS to the surface of the cell membrane, via inactivated flippase and activated scramblase enzymes, to signal phagocytes to remove the cell (Wei et al., 2013). Microglia are known to target these apoptotic cells via expression of PS-specific receptors (Fadok et al., 2000). In recent years several microglia-derived factors that participate in PS-stimulated phagocytosis have been identified. For example, Milk fat globule epidermal growth factor-8 (MFG-E8) is secreted by microglia and links exposed neuronal PS to vitronectin receptors, which modify the actin cytoskeleton to stimulate microglial phagocytosis of dying neurons (Fricker et al., 2012). Therefore, it is plausible that activated microglia may have increased uptake of PS during inflammation, which could potentially drive decreased serum levels observed in PD. It is also plausible that elevated serum PL, could indicate defective microglial phagocytosis.

PUFAs

Polyunsaturated fatty acids have more than one carbon-carbon double bond within the FA hydrocarbon chain. n-3 PUFAs are characterized by a double bond three atoms away from the ω-methyl group. While mammals cannot synthesize n-3 PUFAs, they are available from the diet in the form of essential FAs, such as alpha-linolenic acid (ALA). n-3 PUFAs are associated with a range of benefits: from preventing age related cognitive decline to preventing metabolic syndrome and improving cardiovascular risk factors (Schwinkendorf et al., 2011; Layé et al., 2015; Trépanier et al., 2016). In contrast, omega-6 (n-6) PUFAs, which have their last double bond 6 atoms away from the terminal methyl group, are generally associated with the worsening of many chronic diseases such as obesity, neuroinflammatory diseases, and asthma (Simopoulos, 2016; Brigham et al., 2019). Within the cell membrane, the ratio of n-3 to n-6 PUFAs can influence cell functions (Hennig and Watkins, 1989; Schwinkendorf et al., 2011; Simopoulos, 2016). Both n-3 and n-6 PUFAs are synthesized using the same elongases and desaturases, so they must compete for their creation and integration into the cell membrane (Simopoulos, 2011). PUFAs are abundant within the CNS, making up 30% of the brain’s FAs; n-3 PUFAs account for a third of these (Hamilton et al., 2007). The distribution of PUFAs isn’t homogenous across lipid class (Simopoulos, 2008). For example, TGs and CEs contain eicosatetraenoic acid (EPA), 20:5, and ALA, whereas ALA is scarcely present in PLs, which contain a high concentration of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), 22:6, and EPA (Simopoulos, 2008). PUFAs are also heterogeneously located across different brain regions. About 30% of all fatty acids in the outer segment membrane of retinal photoreceptors are n-3 PUFAs (Bazan et al., 1990). Consequently, a diet rich in n-3 PUFAs significantly slows the decline in visual acuity in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (Berson et al., 2012). In addition, the most prevalent n-3 PUFA in the body, DHA, is found at concentrations that are several hundred-fold higher than EPA in the brain and retina (Arterburn et al., 2006). This may be caused by the brain’s preferential usage of EPA as an energy source that is rapidly catabolized via FAO (Chen and Bazinet, 2015). Importantly, DHA cannot be synthesized de novo in the brain, and until fairly recently, the mechanism of long chain (LC)-FA transportation across the blood brain barrier (BBB) has remained unknown. However, recent studies have shown that a member of the Major Facilitator Superfamily Domain Containing 2A (Mfsd2a) can transport DHA, in the form of lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) (Nguyen et al., 2014). In support, Mfsd2a-knockout mice show markedly reduced levels of DHA in the brain, accompanied by neuronal loss and cognitive deficits (Nguyen et al., 2014). Although initially studies report the expression of Mfsd2a largely in the endothelial cell, subsequent studies have also shown that Mfsd2a is present, albeit at a lower level in OLs, OPCs and astrocytes (Chan et al., 2018). Moreover, increased numbers of activated microglia are observed in the subretinal space of Mfsd2a knockout mice compared to wild-type controls (Wong et al., 2016).

Omega-3 and omega-6 PUFA containing PLs bring about dichotomous secondary mediators when turned over at the level of the cell membrane. The phospholipase A₂ (PLA₂) superfamily of enzymes, hydrolyze FAs from the sn-2 position of membrane PLs, and contain 15 groups that differ in their ability to recognize and respond to various PL substrates. Among these groups, cytosolic group IV of PLA₂ (cPLA₂) releases arachidonic acid (AA), whereas calcium dependent group VI PLA₂ releases DHA (Jenkins et al., 2004). Typically, free DHA is enzymatically metabolized by cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) and lipoxygenases (LOXs) into resolvins, protectins, and maresins, which are known to be potent anti-inflammatory specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs) (Serhan, 2014; Calder, 2015). Free AA, however, is metabolized into prostaglandins, prostacyclins, thromboxanes, and leukotrienes. With a few exceptions, these AA derived mediators are known to produce potent pro-inflammatory effects (Lukiw and Bazan, 2000). Positron emission tomography (PET) has been used to study AA incorporation into the brain (Robinson et al., 1992; Rapoport, 1999), and made important contributions to our understanding of AA turnover and metabolism in various contexts. For example, PET imaging has revealed that AA uptake is elevated in widespread cortical regions in patients with AD compared to healthy controls, which is consistent with the notion that elevated AA is a marker for neuroinflammation (Esposito et al., 2008).

Within microglia, the downstream effects of n-3 PUFA metabolism has been observed to be beneficial in the context of neuroinflammatory diseases. n-3 PUFA supplementation attenuates activation by deacetylation of the High Mobility Group Box 1/Nuclear Factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (HMGB1)/(NF-kB) pathway in a traumatic brain injury (TBI) mouse model (Chen et al., 2018). This in turn leads to decreased inflammatory markers and neuroprotective effects following injury (Chen et al., 2018). Although n-6 PUFAs are generally considered pro-inflammatory, this is not the case for all n-6 PUFAs. For example, supplementation with palmitic acid, a 16-C SFA, can activate microglia (Tu et al., 2019). However, supplementation with n-6 linoleic acid (LA) is sufficient to reverse this activation (Tu et al., 2019). In addition to microglial polarization, a growing body of evidence suggests that different FA classes uniquely alter energy metabolism irrespective of activation status (Button et al., 2014; Chausse et al., 2019). In a study with real-time metabolic measurements coupled with lipidomic analysis, both oleate, a monounsaturated FA (MUFA), and palmitate, a SFA, promoted oxidative metabolism whereas LPS increased glycolysis (Chausse et al., 2019). Although both FAs promoted OXPHOS, oleate treatment increased CD36 abundance (an important scavenger receptor and LC-FA transporter), as well as PUFA-containing TGs, while palmitate incorporated more PUFAs into PLs (Chausse et al., 2019). It is likely that SFA-induced incorporation of PUFAs into PLs contributes to inflammation since PUFAs are more readily peroxidized (Chausse et al., 2019). It is also of note that LPS activation can decrease MUFAs while increasing SFA concentrations, both of which can induce a pro-inflammatory effect (Button et al., 2014). Further studies using metabolomic and lipidomic analysis need to be conducted to fully elucidate the metabolic alterations that take place in microglia in response to different FAs.

Omega-3 PUFA supplementation has also been shown to enhance microglial phagocytosis of myelin (Chen et al., 2014). Several studies have demonstrated that increasing the n-3 to n-6 ratio in fat-1 mice, which express an n-3 FA desaturase that converts n-6 PUFAs to n-3 PUFAs, has beneficial results on the inflammatory status of microglia (Ma et al., 2006; Kang, 2007; Zhang et al., 2017). A recent study used the cuprizone-model of demyelination and remyelination to compare fat-1 mice to WT (Siegert et al., 2017). The CNS lipid profile revealed increased remyelination in fat-1 mice as well as increased EPA levels and EPA metabolites, such as 18-hydroxyeicosapentaenoic acid (18-HEPE) (Siegert et al., 2017). As previously stated, EPA has a relatively low quantity in the CNS lipid profile, and is rapidly utilized as a carbon source in FAO (Chen and Bazinet, 2015). Taken together, perhaps the energy provided from FAO of EPA is critical in fueling phagocytosis of myelin and production of secondary mediators that further aid in the process of remyelination. It is also possible that EPA maintains oxidative metabolism and prevents the shift toward glycolysis that occurs during pro-inflammatory and metabolic reprogramming in microglia.

In addition to fueling oxidative metabolism, PUFAs are also agonists for nuclear receptors with important roles in microglial activation and function. For example, the peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) are a family of nuclear receptors with key roles in lipid and glucose metabolism, inflammation, and proliferation. All three PPAR isoforms (α, β/δ and γ) are activated by naturally occurring FAs such as AA and EPA. Moreover, the downstream metabolite of AA, 15-deoxy-Δ^12–14-PGJ₂ (e.g., 15d-PGJ₂), was the first reported endogenous ligand for PPAR-γ (Forman et al., 1995; Kliewer et al., 1995). Differences in the concentration required to activate PPAR-γ in vitro, and the concentrations naturally present, have called the physiological relevance of 15d-PGJ₂ into question. Nonetheless, PPAR-γ is expressed in primary microglial cells, and its expression is enhanced following 15d-PGJ₂ supplementation (Bernardo et al., 2000). Interestingly LPS-stimulated primary microglia synthesize large amounts of 15d-PGJ₂, which is able to downregulate microglial activation through both PPAR-γ-dependent and independent mechanisms (Bernardo et al., 2003). Since these initial findings, several studies have now shown that natural and synthetic PPAR-γ agonists can down-regulate surface antigens and inflammatory mediators (Fumagalli et al., 2018), while increasing expression of anti-inflammatory factors such as Arginase 1 (ARG1) and IL-4 (Song et al., 2016). It is likely that the pivotal role of PPAR-γ in microglial activation lies with its role in metabolic reprogramming. PPAR-γ signaling directs microglia toward protective functions, such as increased FAO and OXPHOS (Fumagalli et al., 2018). Therefore, PPAR-γ agonists have been extensively studied as potential therapeutics to ameliorate aberrant microglial activation during ND, with mixed results.

FAs in Oxidative Metabolism

Although the brain is only 2% of the total body mass, it utilizes ∼20% of the body’s total ATP. While glucose is the primary source of energy for the brain, it has since been estimated that 20% of the brain’s energy production stems from FAO (Ebert et al., 2003; Bélanger et al., 2011). FAs have also been shown to enter the mammalian brain (Dhopeshwarkar and Mead, 1970; Dhopeshwarkar et al., 1971; Taha et al., 2016). Recent evidence suggests that FA uptake by the brain is both a multifaceted and protein-mediated process (Murphy, 2017). It is likely that technical advances may lead to a deeper understanding of brain metabolism and may challenge the dogma of (largely) exclusive glucose utilization by the brain. In support, several studies have shown that FAs are oxidized in the brain during development and adulthood (Allweis et al., 1966; Warshaw and Terry, 1976). It is believed that FAO occurs predominantly in astrocytes (Ebert et al., 2003). However, since isolated neuronal and glial cells, and mitochondria from both, are able to use FAs to fuel oxidative metabolism (Chausse et al., 2019), it is not implausible that FAs provide an alternative source of energy to neurons and glia, either directly, or via astrocyte-derived lipoproteins (see Figure 2). Thus, a growing body of literature suggests that in addition to the role of lipids as components of myelin debris, or precursors to secondary messengers, FAs may also be an important driver of microglial oxidative metabolism. For example, many genes involved in fatty acid oxidation are expressed in microglia, but this expression is repressed following LPS or INF-γ mediated activation (Mauerer et al., 2009). Importantly, this repression is damped by DHA supplementation (Mauerer et al., 2009).

FIGURE 2

IFN-β is known to increase FAO and OXPHOS in macrophages (Wu et al., 2016). Although an IFN-β-mediated increase in microglial FAO acid oxidation has not been empirically determined, IFN-β is a well-known therapy for MS, and patients undergoing therapy show in an increase in FAO in peripheral myeloid cells (Croze et al., 2013). Moreover, recent studies have shown that supplementation with the IFN-β in a rat model of AD is sufficient to ameliorate microglial activation, reduce ROS and lipid peroxidation, suggesting that IFN-β helps polarize microglia to a phenotype that favors oxidative metabolism (Mudo et al., 2019). These studies highlight the therapeutic potential of IFN-β and FAO to dampen aberrant microglial activation in ND.

Previously, we have shown microglia lacking LPL have significantly reduced FAO, suggesting that lipid uptake fuels lipid oxidation (Bruce et al., 2018). Conversely, L-carnitine supplementation has been shown to increase FAO and attenuate the LPS induced inflammatory response in microglia leading to improved cognitive and neuronal functions (Gill et al., 2018; Singh et al., 2018). Recent studies have also shown that both oleate and palmitate supplementation can sustain mitochondrial respiration in BV-2 microglia, while LPS treatment diminishes oxidative metabolism in favor of increased glycolysis (Chausse et al., 2019). Since LC-PUFAs are important for microglial function, it is likely that peroxisomal β-oxidation is vital to microglial metabolism. Indeed, studies in mice lacking the multi-functional protein-2 (MFP2), a pivotal enzyme in peroxisomal β-oxidation, become profoundly pro-inflammatory (Beckers et al., 2019). Although further studies are needed to identify the principle components of microglial oxidative metabolism, it is likely that FAO is necessary for physiologic energy production and maintenance of an anti-inflammatory phenotype.

To utilize FAs for energy, they must first be taken up by the cell. FA transport proteins (FATPs), FA binding proteins (FABPs), and scavenger receptors that are categorized as class A (SCARA), B (SCARB), or C (SCARC) among others are utilized in both transportation of esterified and non-esterified FAs across the BBB and the monocytic cell membrane. Importantly, these factors are all expressed in microglia, and are regulated during development and disease. CD36, also known as FA translocase (FAT), is a SCARB that plays a major role in microglial LC-FA uptake, oxidized LDL (oxLDL) and fAβ adhesion as well as activation of the innate immune response and ROS production (Coraci et al., 2002; Doens and Fernández, 2014). Interestingly, CD36 is predominantly expressed in microglia of the cerebellum, which may represent increased requirement for FA substrates in a region of the brain where microglia are relatively sparse and are required to survey larger areas (Grabert et al., 2016). Importantly, FAs are often not transported freely. They are instead transported in the form of esterified FAs and CE within lipoproteins.

Cholesterol Metabolism in Microglia

Lipoprotein derived CE is broken down by CE hydrolase to produce cholesterol and free FAs (FFAs). Although relatively understudied, recent proteomic analysis of specific cell types in the brain has shown that neutral CE hydrolase 1 is abundant in neurons and glia (Viader et al., 2016). Cholesterol is an essential component of the cell membranes that are especially important within the brain. The CNS contains 23% of the body’s total cholesterol content; most of which is a major cell membrane component of neurons and myelin (Hamilton et al., 2007). Unlike other organs, most of the cholesterol comes not from the liver, but from synthesis within the brain itself. De novo cholesterol synthesis is not very efficient within neurons, and is primarily achieved by astrocytes (Nieweg et al., 2009). Synthesis of cholesterol, within astrocytes is regulated by sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBPs) as well as 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) (Ye and DeBose-Boyd, 2011). Cholesterol synthesis is vital in the developing CNS, however, in the healthy adult brain, there is a very low level of cholesterol synthesis (Lavrnja et al., 2017). Cholesterol synthesis is high during development due to increased levels of myelinogenesis (Saher et al., 2005), and as previously stated, cholesterol makes up ∼28% of the total lipid volume of myelin (Morell, 1999). In neuroinflammatory diseases, destruction of myelin leads to a buildup of myelin debris that can stimulate microglial phagocytosis, directly inhibit remyelination, and propagates a pro-inflammatory response (Clarner et al., 2012; Kopper and Gensel, 2018). Cholesterol clearance is an important function of microglia (Lavrnja et al., 2017; Cantuti-Castelvetri et al., 2018). In fact, high concentrations of cholesterol are required for the survival of microglia (Bohlen et al., 2017). Additionally, cholesterol is necessary for phagocytosis as well as cytokine release (Churchward and Todd, 2014). Cholesterol homeostasis within the healthy brain also requires its constant elimination from the CNS compartment (Dietschy and Turley, 2004).

The major mechanism for elimination of cholesterol from the brain is its conversion to 24(S)-hydroxycholesterol (24-OHC) which freely exits neurons and the brain (Lund et al., 1999). This is achieved by cholesterol 24S-hydroxylase (CYP46A1) which is solely expressed in neurons in healthy brain (Lund et al., 1999). In neuroinflammatory disease states such as AD and MS, however, CYP46A1 is also highly expressed in both microglia and infiltrating macrophages (Lavrnja et al., 2017). CYP46A1 has been shown to be neuroprotective in the striatum of the R6/2 murine model of Huntington’s disease (Boussicault et al., 2016). These findings highlight the importance of cholesterol elimination and its therapeutic potential. What happens when cholesterol elimination is inadequate, and cholesterol accumulates in the microenvironment? Importantly, CE accumulation is observed in both familial AD (FAD) and sporadic late onset AD (SAD) (van der Kant et al., 2019). Specifically, CE-containing lipids droplets have been shown to accumulate in the SAD brain (Chan et al., 2012). These findings have also been corroborated with observations of increased CE in mouse models of AD (Yang et al., 2014).

In chronic neuroinflammatory states, myelin debris containing phagocytes become “foamy” due to a buildup of FAs, cholesterol, and their breakdown products (Cantuti-Castelvetri et al., 2018). As previously stated, there is a buildup of 7KC in the CSF of patients with MS (Diestel et al., 2003; Leoni et al., 2017). 7KC metabolism is not well understood, however studies suggest that 7KC degradation is facilitated by either 27-hydroxylase or 11 β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1) (Lyons and Brown, 2000; Mitiæ et al., 2013). Therefore, a buildup of 7KC is likely associated with ineffective microglial cholesterol metabolism. For example, MS patients have increased CSF cholesterol, likely as a result impaired cholesterol elimination (van de Kraats et al., 2013). These breakdown products are natural ligands for the liver X receptor (LXR) (see Figure 2). When ligand-bound LXR creates a heterodimer with retinoid X receptor (RXR), which transcriptionally regulates expression of cellular cholesterol efflux proteins such as ApoE and ATP-binding cassette transporters (ABCs) (Zhao and Dahlman-Wright, 2010). ABCA1 and ABCG1 are vital for microglial lipoprotein metabolism as they are responsible for the efflux of cholesterol which gets incorporated into ApoE containing high-density-lipoprotein (HDL)-like particles (Hirsch-Reinshagen et al., 2004). Foamy phagocytes contain increased levels of 24-OHC, 25-OHC, and 27-OHC as well as up-regulated expression of LXR, ABCA1 and ABCG1 (Zhao and Dahlman-Wright, 2010), which may be an attempt to rid foamy microglia or perivascular macrophages of the cholesterol containing myelin debris (Nathanael et al., 2012).

As previously stated, aged microglia have defective phagocytic cholesterol clearance which limits remyelination in MS (Cantuti-Castelvetri et al., 2018). Myelin debris accumulates in the cells’ cytosol as lipid droplets and needle-shaped cholesterol crystals (Cantuti-Castelvetri et al., 2018). Moreover, debris accumulates within microglial lysosomes, leading to lysosomal rupture, and inflammasome stimulation (Cantuti-Castelvetri et al., 2018). Altogether, the balance between cholesterol intake and cholesterol efflux may play a major role in the pathogenesis and progression of neuroinflammatory diseases. Perhaps increased cholesterol efflux may reverse metabolic derangements. For example, a recent study has demonstrated that apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoA-1) binding protein (AIBP) binds to TLR4, a component of the innate immune response, within the cell membranes of activated microglia to stimulate removal of excess cholesterol via efflux to HDL or ApoA-1 (see Figure 2) (Woller et al., 2018). Furthermore, intrathecal AIBP reduces TLR4 dimerization and neuroinflammation in the spinal cord in facilitated pain states (Woller et al., 2018). Although microglial cholesterol efflux is important, a major contributor of cholesterol and oxysterol efflux is achieved by astrocytes and neurons (Chen et al., 2013). Astrocytes also use ABCA1 and ABCG1 for cholesterol efflux into lipoproteins, whereas neurons use ABCA1, ABCG1, and ABCG4 (Chen et al., 2013). Cholesterol efflux seems to have therapeutic potential and can be modulated via lipoprotein metabolism.

Lipoprotein Metabolism in Microglia

Tightly regulated lipid metabolism in the CNS is critical for maintaining normal brain functions. However, because lipids such as cholesterol and triglycerides are insoluble in water, they are transported with apoproteins, which creates an emulsion that can be transported to other cells via the extracellular milieu and/or peripheral circulation. The resulting lipoproteins are complex particles composed of a central hydrophobic core of neutral lipids such as CEs and TGs, surrounded by an amphipathic monolayer of PLs, free cholesterol, and apolipoproteins.

Although lipoprotein metabolism in the circulation and the CNS vary considerably, it is useful to outline what we have learned from circulating lipoproteins for a clearer understanding of lipoprotein metabolism as a whole. In the peripheral circulation, exogenous lipoprotein metabolism begins with TG-rich chylomicrons (CMs) that are hydrolyzed by LPL to produce CM remnants, which are then taken up into the liver. The liver initiates endogenous lipoprotein production via the formation of VLDL carrying a range of apoproteins including apolipoprotein B-100 (ApoB-100) and ApoE. VLDL is hydrolyzed further by LPL to form intermediate-density-lipoproteins (IDL) and low-density-lipoproteins (LDL), also carrying ApoB-100 and ApoE, which are then bound to LDL receptors and internalized by cells of key metabolic tissues such as muscle, heart, adipose tissue and liver (Grunfeld and Feingold, 2018). There are no reports of VLDL and LDL in the CNS. However, it is tempting to speculate that lower-density-lipoproteins could penetrate the BBB in pathological conditions such as increased inflammation. In addition, it is possible that larger lipoproteins could have enhanced penetrance in the circumventricular organs of the brain; regions devoid of a typical BBB with intimate contact between the blood and CSF such as the median eminence (Gross and Weindl, 1987).

In contrast, HDL or HDL-like lipoproteins may traverse the BBB to enter the CSF under physiologic conditions (Stukas et al., 2014). In the periphery, the first step in HDL formation involves the synthesis of ApoA-I by the liver and intestine. After secretion, ApoA-I acquires cholesterol and PLs that are effluxed by hepatocytes and enterocytes. Cholesterol efflux is regulated by ABCA1, ABCG1 and class B scavenger receptor protein (SR-B1). It is thought that increased intracellular cholesterol leads to oxysterol formation, which triggers the activation of the LXR-RXR heterodimer and ABCA1 and ABCG1 expression in order to efflux/remove cholesterol from the cell. During lipidation, Lecithin–cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) transfers a FA from PLs to free cholesterol forming CE, which can then be transferred to the HDL-core (Grunfeld and Feingold, 2018). Sterol O-acyltransferase (ACAT) shares a similar function to LCAT, however it catalyzes the formation of CEs from cholesterol and LC-fatty acyl-CoA and plays a role in hepatic lipoprotein assembly (Li et al., 1999). Although ApoA-I is not synthesized in the brain, fluorescently labeled ApoA-I rapidly accumulates in the CSF after intravenous injection (Stukas et al., 2014), highlighting a plausible role in cholesterol delivery to and from the brain (Mahley, 2016).

ApoA-I is a major apoprotein of HDL-like particles in the brain, second only to ApoE. Unlike ApoA-I, ApoE is synthetized within the CNS predominantly by astrocytes (including specialized astrocytic cells, Bergmann glia, tanycytes, pituicytes, and retinal Muller cells) (Boyles et al., 1985). It has been suggested that astrocytes secrete cholesterol-rich ApoE/HDL through an interaction with ABCA1, to provide cholesterol to other cells of the CNS (Ito et al., 2014). Astrocyte derived ApoE/HDL cholesterol is involved in the provision of lipids for axonal growth and regeneration (Vance et al., 2000), and synaptogenesis (Mauch et al., 2001). Importantly, other cell types can increase ApoE production when the need for lipid substrates is greater, such as during development, injury or stress. For example, in mice expressing enhanced GFP (EGFP) ApoE, injured neurons produce high levels of EGFP and ApoE mRNA in the hippocampus (Xu et al., 2006). ApoE is also expressed in type 1 NSCs (Hong et al., 2016), and can directly regulate proliferation and spine density (Hong et al., 2016). Similarly, scRNA-seq studies have shown that microglia express higher levels of ApoE in the embryonic mouse brain (E14.5) (Hammond et al., 2019), during LPC mediated demyelination injury (Hammond et al., 2019), and in the late stages of disease pathogenesis in murine models of AD (Keren-Shaul et al., 2017). Although the precise role of increased ApoE production in microglia is unknown and may be activation-state and/or microglial subpopulation specific, it is likely that increased ApoE may be a response to increased intracellular cholesterol accumulation. For example, during late embryogenesis a significant number of OLs undergo apoptosis (discussed above). In addition to microglial phagocytosis of dying cells and myelin debris, resident microglia may also increase ApoE production concurrently in order to efflux accumulating cholesterols and oxysterols in an attempt to maintain normal microglial function. Although this has not been empirically determined, aging microglia show reduced ApoE production and massive cholesterol accumulation, with major detriment to their phagocytic capacity (Cantuti-Castelvetri et al., 2018). Interestingly, LXR agonists have been shown to reduce neurodegeneration and pathology in neurogenerative animal models, suggesting that ABCA1/ABCG1-mediated cholesterol efflux promotes homeostatic glial functions (Cantuti-Castelvetri et al., 2018).

In addition to cholesterol efflux, apoproteins and lipoproteins have been repeatedly implicated in microglial phagocytosis. For example, ApoE is known to bind to LDL receptors (e.g. LDL receptor [LDLR], LDL Receptor Related Protein 1 [LRP1] and VLDL receptor [VLDLR]) on the surface of microglia and become internalized via receptor-mediated endocytosis (Pocivavsek et al., 2009). Recently, several other cell surface factors that may participate in lipoprotein uptake and/or endocytosis have been identified. TREM2 is a recently discovered AD risk gene that encodes a single-transmembrane protein that is selectively expressed in the microglia in the CNS (Klesney-Tait et al., 2006). Although the physiological role of TREM2 is still under investigation, it is thought to be protective in the context of AD since TREM2 deficiency in the 5XFAD mouse model causes increased amyloid deposition (Wang et al., 2015), whereas overexpression of TREM2 in the Amyloid precursor protein/Presenilin-1 (APP)/(PS1) mouse ameliorates neuropathology (Jiang et al., 2014). Since Aβ is known to bind to ApoE, the protection offered by TREM2 maybe conferred through its ability to bind to phospholipids and apoproteins (ApoE and apolipoprotein J [ApoJ]) and to increase phagocytosis (Atagi et al., 2015). TREM2 has been shown to interact with Aβ-bound lipoproteins to facilitate Aβ uptake by microglia and human macrophages (Yeh et al., 2016). In fact, TREM2 serves as an extracellular lipid and lipoprotein receptor that modulates the inflammatory profile of microglia depending on the affinity of ligand binding (Lessard et al., 2018). Specifically, high avidity ligands, such as lipids and ApoE, bind TREM2 causing phosphorylation of two tyrosine residues within the adjacent transmembrane DNA polymerase III-Activation Protein 12 (DAP12) (Lessard et al., 2018). This initiates a cellular cascade culminating in survival, proliferation, phagocytosis, and motility depending on the ligand (Lessard et al., 2018). Conversely, when TREM2 is associated with low avidity ligands, an intracellular cascade is initiated that may promote inflammatory functions within the cell (Lessard et al., 2018). Recent work suggests that PS and PE from apoptotic neurons (which are not exposed on the surface of healthy cells) act as signals for TREM2-mediated microglial activation (Shirotani et al., 2019). This topic has been more comprehensively reviewed in a number of recent peer-reviewed articles (Jay et al., 2017; Gratuze et al., 2018).

Human ApoE exists as three major isoforms ApoE2, ApoE3 and ApoE4, which are encoded by three allelic variants at a single gene locus on the long arm of chromosome 19. Each isoform differs by 2 amino acid substitutions (ApoE2 [Cys112, Cys158], ApoE3 [Cys112, Arg158], and ApoE4 [Arg112, Arg158]), which significantly alters their lipid and receptor binding affinities (Mahley and Rall, 2000; Wu and Zhao, 2016). ApoE2 has a lower affinity for LDLRs compared to ApoE3 and ApoE4. In addition, ApoE2 and ApoE3 preferentially bind to small, PL-rich HDL whereas ApoE4 preferentially binds to larger, TG-rich lipoproteins (Wu and Zhao, 2016). ApoE3 is present in approximately 75% of the population and is believed to play a neutral role in AD. In contrast, ApoE2 is relatively rare (5% incidence) and is considered to be protective against AD (Wu and Zhao, 2016). While the mechanism of this protection is unclear, it is plausible that its differential association with CNS derived HDL-like lipoprotein particles plays a major role. Importantly, the ApoE4 isoform (present in 20% of the population), is present in nearly 50% of AD patients (Wu and Zhao, 2016). Although there has been a major research effort attempting to understand the increased risk of AD conferred by ApoE4, the mechanisms remain elusive. Nonetheless, in murine models of AD, it has been established that ApoE isoforms differentially effect Aβ accumulation in a dose- and isoform- dependent manner, with hippocampal Aβ burden: ApoE2 < ApoE3 < ApoE4 (Castellano et al., 2011). Findings from in vitro studies have shown that ApoE4 can inhibit TREM2 expression in primary murine microglia (Li et al., 2015), therefore potentially blocking the appropriate microglial response to Aβ accumulation.

ApoE4 is not the only apoprotein associated with increased AD risk. In 2009, two Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) identified ApoJ (otherwise known as Clusterin [CLU]) as a novel SAD-risk gene (Harold et al., 2009; Lambert et al., 2009). ApoJ is now considered the third greatest risk factor for SAD. Although a number of possible mechanisms have been proposed, including its role in TREM2-mediated microglial lipoprotein and Aβ clearance (Yeh et al., 2016), its precise function is has yet to be determined (Foster et al., 2019).

The Role of Lpl in Microglia Function and Metabolism

In the periphery, LPL is primarily involved in the hydrolysis of CM-TG and VLDL-TG. In the murine brain LPL is predominantly expressed in microglia/macrophages and the OPC (Zhang et al., 2014), whereas in the human brain LPL is predominantly expressed in microglia (Zhang et al., 2016). Although the role of LPL in microglia is not well understood, LPL has been repeatedly implicated in AD pathogenesis in humans. For example, patients with AD have reduced LPL immunoreactivity in the dentate gyrus and reduced LPL activity in their CSF (Gong et al., 2013). In addition, loss of function LPL polymorphisms have been linked to reduced enzymatic activity, increased VLDL-TG, and increased AD risk (Ren and Ren, 2016). In contrast, patients with a gain-of-function LPL polymorphism (447Ter) have increased LPL activity concomitant with lower VLDL-TG, higher HDL, and significantly reduced hippocampal amyloid plaque formation (Baum et al., 2000). Moreover, there is a growing body of literature highlighting the importance of LPL in microglial function. For example, in the 5XFAD mouse model of AD, LPL expression is dramatically increased in DAM (Keren-Shaul et al., 2017). Importantly, markedly enhanced LPL expression repeatedly observed in microglial subpopulations, particularly in the context of development (Hammond et al., 2019), demyelination (Hammond et al., 2019), and disease (Mathys et al., 2017). In both mouse and human brains, LPL co-localizes with microglia that have internalized Aβ (Keren-Shaul et al., 2017), suggesting that microglial-LPL may also play a role in Aβ uptake. Indeed, LPL has been shown to directly bind Aβ and play a role in uptake and degradation in astrocytes (Nishitsuji et al., 2011). However, exactly how LPL may interact with Aβ remains to be determined. Since LPL is known to directly interact with LRP1 (Beisiegel et al., 1991; Chappell et al., 1992), which is major receptor for both ApoE and Aβ (Herz and Strickland, 2001), it is plausible that LPL could facilitate Aβ uptake through interaction with other factors expressed on the microglia cell surface. LPL also directly interacts with ApoE (Baum et al., 2000), and it is plausible that the strength of the interaction may vary depending on the isoform’s specific lipid binding avidity. The role of LPL in microglia could conceivably link both lipid metabolism and inflammation. We have previously shown that the BV-2 microglia is polarized to a robust inflammatory phenotype following LPL loss, a phenotype that is recapitulated in primary microglia (Bruce et al., 2018). Moreover, loss of LPL shifts the metabolic profile of microglial cell lines toward increased glycolysis and reduced oxidative metabolism, reminiscent of the Warburg-like metabolism observed in inflammatory macrophages (Bruce et al., 2018). Our findings suggest that the importance of LPL in microglia may extend beyond phagocytosis of Aβ to regulation of metabolic and inflammatory phenotype.

Future Strategies

The findings highlighted in this review suggest that lipid and lipoprotein metabolism is a tightly regulated component of microglial immunometabolism. The changes seen in microglial lipid metabolism during damage and disease are some of the most drastic and profound responses that have been observed to date. This suggests that microglial lipid, cholesterol, and lipoprotein metabolism may be novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of CNS disorders such as ND. Since pro-inflammatory microglia and perivascular macrophages that may contribute to ND progression exhibit increased glycolysis but decreased OXPHOS and FAO, it is plausible that modulating substrate utilization in microglia could ameliorate neuroinflammation. Although the optimal method to switch substrate usage in microglia has not been defined, several studies have shown that dietary approaches are sufficient to modulate microglial immunometabolism. Ketogenic diets typically contain very low carbohydrate, but very high fat levels and therefore have the capacity to promote FAO and limit glycolytic flux. In a recent study using a murine model of glaucoma, a ketogenic diet (10.4% protein, 0.1% carbohydrate, and 89.5% fat) was able to reduce markers of microglial activation such as Ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1) (Harun-Or-Rashid and Inman, 2018). It has also been shown that ketones can directly modulate inflammation in microglia. For example, β-hydroxybutyrate activates G-protein-coupled receptors 109A (GPR109A) to attenuate NF-κB signaling and pro-inflammatory cytokine production (Fu et al., 2015). These studies suggest that ketogenic diets may be a promising strategy; however, it is important that we do not halt the waves of microglial activation that may be potentially protective in the contexts of certain disease states. In addition, it is critical to carefully evaluate the lipid composition of these diets, since only those including LC-FAs would promote mitochondrial oxidative metabolism. It is also important to note that ketogenic diets may not be optimal for overall metabolic health, and other strategies, such as caloric restriction, and fasting may increase ketone delivery to the brain to down-regulate microglial activation without markedly elevating lipid consumption (Loncarevic-Vasiljkovic et al., 2012; Tu et al., 2012; Ghosh et al., 2018).

Concluding Remarks

In summary, microglia are dynamic cells that are not only critical for homeostatic brain functions but in mitigating the response to a variety of stimuli such as primary myelination, and demyelination. During their response, microglia tightly regulate lipid and lipoprotein metabolism in order to fuel greater bioenergetics needs, to phagocytose and process lipid-rich debris, and to produce precursors for secondary messengers. Although recent studies have galvanized the importance of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism in microglia, this emerging field is likely to reveal further important mechanisms going forward. In addition, further study into the role of lipid metabolism in the polarization of microglial inflammatory status may highlight novel approaches that modulate metabolism to ameliorate neuroinflammatory and NDs.

References

• 1

  AbsintaM.SatiP.MasuzzoF.NairG.SethiV.KolbH.et al (2019). Association of chronic active multiple sclerosis lesions with disability in vivo.761474–1483. JAMA Neurol.10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2399

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AjamiB.BennettJ. L.KriegerC.TetzlaffW.RossiF. M. (2007). Local self-renewal can sustain CNS microglia maintenance and function throughout adult life.Nat. Neurosci.101538–1543. 10.1038/nn2014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AldanaB. I. (2019). Microglia-specific metabolic changes in neurodegeneration.J. Mol. Biol.4311830–1842. 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.03.006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  AlliotF.GodinI.PessacB. (1999). Microglia derive from progenitors, originating from the yolk sac, and which proliferate in the brain.Dev. Brain Res.117145–152. 10.1016/s0165-3806(99)00113-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  AlliotF.LecainE.GrimaB.PessacB. (1991). Microglial progenitors with a high proliferative potential in the embryonic and adult mouse brain.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.88:1541. 10.1073/pnas.88.4.1541

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  AllweisC.LandauT.AbelesM.MagnesJ. (1966). The oxidation of uniformly labelled albumin-bound palmitic acid to CO2 by the perfused cat brain.J. Neurochem.13795–804. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1966.tb05874.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  ArterburnL. M.HallE. B.OkenH. (2006). Distribution, interconversion, and dose response of n-3 fatty acids in humans.Am. J. Clin. Nutr.831467s–1476s. 10.1093/ajcn/83.6.1467S

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  AskewK.LiK.Olmos-AlonsoA.Garcia-MorenoF.LiangY.RichardsonP.et al (2017). Coupled proliferation and apoptosis maintain the rapid turnover of microglia in the adult brain.Cell Rep.18391–405. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.041

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  AtagiY.LiuC. C.PainterM. M.ChenX. F.VerbeeckC.ZhengH.et al (2015). Apolipoprotein E is a ligand for triggering receptor expressed on myeloid Cells 2 (TREM2).J. Biol. Chem.29026043–26050. 10.1074/jbc.m115.679043

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  BaikS. H.KangS.LeeW.ChoiH.ChungS.KimJ. I.et al (2019). A breakdown in metabolic reprogramming causes microglia dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease.Cell Metab.30493–507.e6. 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.06.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  BarresB. A.HartI. K.ColesH. S. R.BurneJ. F.VoyvodicJ. T.RichardsonW. D.et al (1992). Cell death and control of cell survival in the oligodendrocyte lineage.Cell7031–46. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90531-g

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  BaumL.WiebuschH.PangC. P. (2000). Roles for lipoprotein lipase in Alzheimer’s disease: an association study.Microsc. Res. Tech.50291–296. 10.1002/1097-0029(20000815)50:4<291::aid-jemt8>3.0.co;2-l

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  BazanH. E.BazanN. G.Feeney-BurnsL.BermanE. R. (1990). Lipids in human lipofuscin-enriched subcellular fractions of two age populations. Comparison with rod outer segments and neural retina.Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.311433–1443.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  BeckersL.GericI.StroobantsS.BeelS.Van DammeP.D’HoogeR.et al (2019). Microglia lacking a peroxisomal beta-oxidation enzyme chronically alter their inflammatory profile without evoking neuronal and behavioral deficits.J. Neuroinflammation16:61. 10.1186/s12974-019-1442-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  BeisiegelU.WeberW.Bengtsson-OlivecronaG. (1991). Lipoprotein lipase enhances the binding of chylomicrons to low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.888342–8346. 10.1073/pnas.88.19.8342

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  BélangerM.AllamanI.MagistrettiP. J. (2011). Brain energy metabolism: focus on astrocyte-neuron metabolic cooperation.Cell Metab.14724–738. 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.08.016

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  BennettM. L.BennettF. C. (2020). The influence of environment and origin on brain resident macrophages and implications for therapy.Nat. Neurosci.23157–166. 10.1038/s41593-019-0545-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  BernardoA.Ajmone-CatM. A.LeviG.MinghettiL. (2003). 15-deoxy-delta12,14-prostaglandin J2 regulates the functional state and the survival of microglial cells through multiple molecular mechanisms.J. Neurochem.87742–751. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.02045.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  BernardoA.LeviG.MinghettiL. (2000). Role of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) and its natural ligand 15-deoxy-Delta12, 14-prostaglandin J2 in the regulation of microglial functions.Eur. J. Neurosci.122215–2223. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00110.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  BersonE. L.RosnerB.SandbergM. A.Weigel-DiFrancoC.WillettW. C. (2012). ω-3 intake and visual acuity in patients with retinitis pigmentosa receiving vitamin A.Arch. Ophthalmol.130707–711.

  • Google Scholar

• 21

  BhattacharyyaR.KovacsD. M. (2010). ACAT inhibition and amyloid beta reduction.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1801960–965. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2010.04.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  BialasA. R.StevensB. (2013). TGF-beta signaling.Nat. Neurosci.161773–1782. 10.1038/nn.3560

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  BilimoriaP. M.StevensB. (2015). Microglia function during brain development: new insights from animal models.Brain Res.16177–17. 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.11.032

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  BjornevikK.ChitnisT.AscherioA.MungerK. L. (2017). Polyunsaturated fatty acids and the risk of multiple sclerosis.Mult. Scler.231830–1838. 10.1177/1352458517691150

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  BohlenC. J.BennettF. C.TuckerA. F.CollinsH. Y.MulinyaweS. B.BarresB. A. (2017). Diverse requirements for microglial survival, specification, and function revealed by defined-medium cultures.Neuron94759–773.e8. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.043

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  BoussicaultL.AlvesS.LamazièreA.PlanquesA.HeckN.MoumnéL.et al (2016). CYP46A1, the rate-limiting enzyme for cholesterol degradation, is neuroprotective in Huntington’s disease.Brain J. Neurol.139953–970. 10.1093/brain/awv384

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  BoylesJ. K.PitasR. E.WilsonE.MahleyR. W.TaylorJ. M. (1985). Apolipoprotein E associated with astrocytic glia of the central nervous system and with nonmyelinating glia of the peripheral nervous system.J. Clin. Invest.761501–1513. 10.1172/jci112130

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  BrighamE. P.WooH.McCormackM.RiceJ.KoehlerK.VulcainT.et al (2019). Omega-3 and Omega-6 intake modifies asthma severity and response to indoor air pollution in children.Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.1991478–1486. 10.1164/rccm.201808-1474OC

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  BruceK. D.GorkhaliS.GivenK.CoatesA. M.BoyleK. E.MacklinW. B.et al (2018). Lipoprotein lipase is a feature of alternatively-activated microglia and may facilitate lipid uptake in the CNS during demyelination.Front. Mol. Neurosci.11:57. 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00057

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  BruceK. D.ZsombokA.EckelR. H. (2017). Lipid processing in the brain: a key regulator of systemic metabolism.Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne)8:60. 10.3389/fendo.2017.00060

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  BrylevaE. Y.RogersM. A.ChangC. C.BuenF.HarrisB. T.RousseletE.et al (2010). ACAT1 gene ablation increases 24(S)-hydroxycholesterol content in the brain and ameliorates amyloid pathology in mice with AD.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1073081–3086. 10.1073/pnas.0913828107

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  ButovskyO.JedrychowskiM. P.MooreC. S.CialicR.LanserA. J.GabrielyG.et al (2014). Identification of a unique TGF-beta-dependent molecular and functional signature in microglia.Nat. Neurosci.17131–143. 10.1038/nn.3599

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  ButtonE. B.MitchellA. S.DomingosM. M.ChungJ. H.BradleyR. M.HashemiA.et al (2014). Microglial cell activation increases saturated and decreases monounsaturated fatty acid content, but both lipid species are proinflammatory.Lipids49305–316. 10.1007/s11745-014-3882-y

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  CalderP. C. (2015). Marine omega-3 fatty acids and inflammatory processes: effects, mechanisms and clinical relevance.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1851469–484. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.08.010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  CannonT. D.ChungY.HeG.SunD.JacobsonA.van ErpT. G.et al (2015). Progressive reduction in cortical thickness as psychosis develops: a multisite longitudinal neuroimaging study of youth at elevated clinical risk.Biol. Psychiatry77147–157. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.05.023

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  Cantuti-CastelvetriL.FitznerD.Bosch-QueraltM.WeilM.-T.SuM.SenP. (2018). Defective cholesterol clearance limits remyelination in the aged central nervous system.Science359:684. 10.1126/science.aan4183

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  CardonaA. E.PioroE. P.SasseM. E.KostenkoV.CardonaS. M.DijkstraI. M.et al (2006). Control of microglial neurotoxicity by the fractalkine receptor.Nat. Neurosci.9917–924. 10.1038/nn1715

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  CarrollM. C. (2004). The complement system in B cell regulation.Mol. Immunol.41141–146. 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.03.017

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  CastellanoJ. M.KimJ.StewartF. R.JiangH.DeMattosR. B.PattersonB. W.et al (2011). Human apoE isoforms differentially regulate brain amyloid-beta peptide clearance.Sci. Transl. Med.3:89ra57. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002156

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  ChanJ. P.WongB. H.ChinC. F.GalamD. L. A.FooJ. C.WongL. C.et al (2018). The lysolipid transporter Mfsd2a regulates lipogenesis in the developing brain.PLoS Biol.16:e2006443. 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006443

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  ChanR. B.OliveiraT. G.CortesE. P.HonigL. S.DuffK. E.SmallS. A.et al (2012). Comparative lipidomic analysis of mouse and human brain with Alzheimer disease.J. Biol. Chem.2872678–2688. 10.1074/jbc.M111.274142

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  ChappellD. A.FryG. L.WaknitzM. A.IveriusP. H.WilliamsS. E.StricklandD. K. (1992). The low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor binds and mediates catabolism of bovine milk lipoprotein lipase.J. Biol. Chem.26725764–25767.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  ChausseB.KakimotoP. A.Caldeira-da-SilvaC. C.Chaves-FilhoA. B.YoshinagaM. Y.da SilvaR. P.et al (2019). Distinct metabolic patterns during microglial remodeling by oleate and palmitate.Biosci. Rep.39:BSR20190072. 10.1042/BSR20190072

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  ChenC. T.BazinetR. P. (2015). β-oxidation and rapid metabolism, but not uptake regulate brain eicosapentaenoic acid levels.Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids9233–40. 10.1016/j.plefa.2014.05.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  ChenJ.ZhangX.KusumoH.CostaL. G.GuizzettiM. (2013). Cholesterol efflux is differentially regulated in neurons and astrocytes: implications for brain cholesterol homeostasis.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1831263–275. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.09.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  ChenS.ZhangH.PuH.WangG.LiW.LeakR. K.et al (2014). n-3 PUFA supplementation benefits microglial responses to myelin pathology.Sci. Rep.4:7458. 10.1038/srep07458

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  ChenX.ChenC.FanS.WuS.YangF.FangZ.et al (2018). Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid attenuates the inflammatory response by modulating microglia polarization through SIRT1-mediated deacetylation of the HMGB1/NF-kappaB pathway following experimental traumatic brain injury.J. Neuroinflammation15:116. 10.1186/s12974-018-1151-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  ChuY.JinX.ParadaI.PesicA.StevensB.BarresB.et al (2010). Enhanced synaptic connectivity and epilepsy in C1q knockout mice.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1077975–7980. 10.1073/pnas.0913449107

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  ChurchwardM. A.ToddK. G. (2014). Statin treatment affects cytokine release and phagocytic activity in primary cultured microglia through two separable mechanisms.Mol. Brain7:85. 10.1186/s13041-014-0085-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  ClarnerT.DiederichsF.BergerK.DeneckeB.GanL.van der ValkP.et al (2012). Myelin debris regulates inflammatory responses in an experimental demyelination animal model and multiple sclerosis lesions.Glia601468–1480. 10.1002/glia.22367

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  ColonnaM.ButovskyO. (2017). Microglia function in the central nervous System during health and neurodegeneration.Annu. Rev. Immunol.35441–468. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-051116-052358

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  CoraciI. S.HusemannJ.BermanJ. W.HuletteC.DufourJ. H.CampanellaG. K.et al (2002). CD36, a class B scavenger receptor, is expressed on microglia in Alzheimer’s disease brains and can mediate production of reactive oxygen species in response to beta-amyloid fibrils.Am. J. Pathol.160101–112. 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64354-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  CrottiA.RansohoffR. M. (2016). Microglial physiology and pathophysiology: insights from genome-wide transcriptional profiling.Immunity44505–515. 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  CrozeE.YamaguchiK. D.KnappertzV.RederA. T.SalamonH. (2013). Interferon-beta-1b-induced short- and long-term signatures of treatment activity in multiple sclerosis.Pharmacogenomics J.13443–451. 10.1038/tpj.2012.27

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  DavalosD.GrutzendlerJ.YangG.KimJ. V.ZuoY.JungS.et al (2005). ATP mediates.Nat. Neurosci.8752–758.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  DeS.Van DerenD.PedenE.HockinM.BouletA.TitenS.et al (2018). Two distinct ontogenies confer heterogeneity to mouse brain microglia.Development145:dev152306. 10.1242/dev.152306

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  DhopeshwarkarG. A.MeadJ. F. (1970). Fatty acid uptake by the brain. 3. Incorporation of (1-14C)oleic acid into the adult rat brain.Biochim. Biophys. Acta210250–256.

  • Google Scholar

• 58

  DhopeshwarkarG. A.SubramanianC.MeadJ. F. (1971). Fatty acid uptake by the brain. IV. Incorporation of (I-14C)linoleic acid into the adult rat brain.Biochim. Biophys. Acta2318–14. 10.1016/0005-2760(71)90250-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  Di PaoloG.KimT.-W. (2011). Linking lipids to Alzheimer’s disease: cholesterol and beyond.Nat. Rev. Neurosci.12284–296. 10.1038/nrn3012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  DiestelA.AktasO.HackelD.HakeI.MeierS.RaineC. S.et al (2003). Activation of microglial poly(ADP-ribose)-polymerase-1 by cholesterol breakdown products during neuroinflammation: a link between demyelination and neuronal damage.J. Exp. Med.1981729–1740. 10.1084/jem.20030975

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  DietschyJ. M.TurleyS. D. (2004). Thematic review series: brain Lipids. Cholesterol metabolism in the central nervous system during early development and in the mature animal.J. Lipid Res.451375–1397. 10.1194/jlr.r400004-jlr200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  DimasP.MontaniL.PereiraJ. A.MorenoD.TrötzmüllerM.GerberJ.et al (2019). CNS myelination and remyelination depend on fatty acid synthesis by oligodendrocytes.eLife8:e44702. 10.7554/eLife.44702

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  DoensD.FernándezP. L. (2014). Microglia receptors and their implications in the response to amyloid β for Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis.J. Neuroinflammation11:48. 10.1186/1742-2094-11-48

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  EbertD.HallerR. G.WaltonM. E. (2003). Energy contribution of octanoate to intact rat brain metabolism measured by 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.J. Neurosci.235928–5935. 10.1523/jneurosci.23-13-05928.2003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  EhehaltR.KellerP.HaassC.ThieleC.SimonsK. (2003). Amyloidogenic processing of the Alzheimer beta-amyloid precursor protein depends on lipid rafts.J. Cell Biol.160113–123. 10.1083/jcb.200207113

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  EspositoG.GiovacchiniG.LiowJ. S.BhattacharjeeA. K.GreensteinD.SchapiroM.et al (2008). Imaging neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease with radiolabeled arachidonic acid and PET.J. Nucl. Med.491414–1421. 10.2967/jnumed.107.049619

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  FadokV. A.BrattonD. L.RoseD. M.PearsonA.EzekewitzR. A.HensonP. M. (2000). A receptor for phosphatidylserine-specific clearance of apoptotic cells.Nature40585–90. 10.1038/35011084

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  FeingoldK. R.ShigenagaJ. K.KazemiM. R.McDonaldC. M.PatzekS. M.CrossA. S.et al (2012). Mechanisms of triglyceride accumulation in activated macrophages.J. Leukoc. Biol.92829–839. 10.1189/jlb.1111537

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  FoleyP. (2010). Lipids in Alzheimer’s disease: a century-old story.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1801750–753. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2010.05.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  FormanB. M.TontonozP.ChenJ.BrunR. P.SpiegelmanB. M.EvansR. M. (1995). 15-Deoxy-delta 12, 14-prostaglandin J2 is a ligand for the adipocyte determination factor PPAR gamma.Cell83803–812. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90193-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  FosterE. M.Dangla-VallsA.LovestoneS.RibeE. M.BuckleyN. J. (2019). Clusterin in Alzheimer’s disease: mechanisms, genetics, and lessons from other pathologies.Front. Neurosci.13:164. 10.3389/fnins.2019.00164

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  FrickerM.NeherJ. J.ZhaoJ. W.TheryC.TolkovskyA. M.BrownG. C. (2012). MFG-E8 mediates primary phagocytosis of viable neurons during neuroinflammation.J. Neurosci.322657–2666. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4837-11.2012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  FuR.ShenQ.XuP.LuoJ. J.TangY. (2014). Phagocytosis of microglia in the central nervous system diseases.Mol. Neurobiol.491422–1434. 10.1007/s12035-013-8620-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  FuS. P.WangJ. F.XueW. J.LiuH. M.LiuB. R.ZengY. L.et al (2015). Anti-inflammatory effects of BHBA in both in vivo and in vitro Parkinson’s disease models are mediated by GPR109A-dependent mechanisms.J. Neuroinflammation12:9. 10.1186/s12974-014-0230-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  FumagalliM.LombardiM.GressensP.VerderioC. (2018). How to reprogram microglia toward beneficial functions.Glia662531–2549. 10.1002/glia.23484

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  GasqueP. (2004). Complement: a unique innate immune sensor for danger signals.Mol. Immunol.411089–1098. 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.06.011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  GhoshS.CastilloE.FriasE. S.SwansonR. A. (2018). Bioenergetic regulation of microglia.Glia661200–1212. 10.1002/glia.23271

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  GillE. L.RamanS.YostR. A.GarrettT. J.Vedam-MaiV. (2018). l-Carnitine inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced nitric oxide production of SIM-A9 microglia cells.ACS Chem. Neurosci.9901–905. 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00468

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  GinhouxF.GreterM.LeboeufM.NandiS.SeeP.GokhanS.et al (2010). Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages.Science330841–845. 10.1126/science.1194637

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  GlantzL. A.LewisD. A. (2000). Decreased dendritic spine density on prefrontal cortical pyramidal neurons in schizophrenia.Arch. Gen. Psychiatry5765–73.

  • Google Scholar

• 81

  GlausierJ. R.LewisD. A. (2013). Dendritic spine pathology in schizophrenia.Neuroscience25190–107. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.044

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  GoldmannT.WieghoferP.JordãoM. J. C.PrutekF.HagemeyerN.FrenzelK.et al (2016). Origin, fate and dynamics of macrophages at central nervous system interfaces.Nat. Immunol.17:797. 10.1038/ni.3423

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 83

  GongH.DongW.RostadS. W.MarcovinaS. M.AlbersJ. J.BrunzellJ. D.et al (2013). Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is associated with neurite pathology and its levels are markedly reduced in the dentate gyrus of Alzheimer’s disease brains.J. Histochem. Cytochem.61857–868. 10.1369/0022155413505601

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  GrabertK.MichoelT.KaravolosM. H.ClohiseyS.BaillieJ. K.StevensM. P.et al (2016). Microglial brain region-dependent diversity and selective regional sensitivities to aging.Nat. Neurosci.19504–516. 10.1038/nn.4222

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  GratuzeM.LeynsC. E. G.HoltzmanD. M. (2018). New insights into the role of TREM2 in Alzheimer’s disease.Mol. Neurodegener.13:66. 10.1186/s13024-018-0298-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  GreenD. R.OguinT. H.MartinezJ. (2016). The clearance of dying cells: table for two.Cell Death Differ.23915–926. 10.1038/cdd.2015.172

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  GrossP. M.WeindlA. (1987). Peering through the windows of the brain.J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.7663–672. 10.1038/jcbfm.1987.120

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  GrunfeldC.FeingoldK. R. (2018). Introduction to Lipids and Lipoproteins. [Updated 2018 Feb 2].South Dartmouth, MA: MDText.com, Inc.

  • Google Scholar

• 89

  HaageV.SemtnerM.VidalR. O.HernandezD. P.PongW. W.ChenZ.et al (2019). Comprehensive gene expression meta-analysis identifies signature genes that distinguish microglia from peripheral monocytes/macrophages in health and glioma.Acta Neuropathol. Commun.7:20. 10.1186/s40478-019-0665-y

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  HamiltonJ. A.HillardC. J.SpectorA. A.WatkinsP. A. (2007). Brain uptake and utilization of fatty acids, lipids and lipoproteins: application to neurological disorders.J. Mol. Neurosci.332–11. 10.1007/s12031-007-0060-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91

  HammondT. R.DufortC.Dissing-OlesenL.GieraS.YoungA.WysokerA.et al (2019). Single-cell RNA sequencing of microglia throughout the mouse lifespan and in the injured brain reveals complex cell-state changes.Immunity50253–271.e6. 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.11.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  HaroldD.AbrahamR.HollingworthP.SimsR.GerrishA.HamshereM. L.et al (2009). Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and PICALM associated with Alzheimer’s disease.Nat. Genet.411088–1093.

  • Google Scholar

• 93

  HarrisonJ. K.JiangY.ChenS.XiaY.MaciejewskiD.McNamaraR. K.et al (1998). Role for neuronally derived fractalkine in mediating interactions between neurons and CX3CR1-expressing microglia.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.9510896–10901. 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10896

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  Harun-Or-RashidM.InmanD. M. (2018). Reduced AMPK activation and increased HCAR activation drive anti-inflammatory response and neuroprotection in glaucoma.J. Neuroinflammation15:313. 10.1186/s12974-018-1346-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  HattoriC.AsaiM.OnishiH.SasagawaN.HashimotoY.SaidoT. C.et al (2006). BACE1 interacts with lipid raft proteins.J. Neurosci. Res.84912–917. 10.1002/jnr.20981

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  HennigB.WatkinsB. A. (1989). Linoleic acid and linolenic acid: effect on permeability properties of cultured endothelial cell monolayers.Am. J. Clin. Nutr.49301–305. 10.1093/ajcn/49.2.301

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97

  HerzJ.StricklandD. K. (2001). LRP: a multifunctional.J. Clin. Invest.108779–784. 10.1172/jci200113992

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  Hirsch-ReinshagenV.ZhouS.BurgessB. L.BernierL.McIsaacS. A.ChanJ. Y.et al (2004). Deficiency of ABCA1 impairs apolipoprotein E metabolism in brain.J. Biol. Chem.27941197–41207. 10.1074/jbc.m407962200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  HongS.WashingtonP. M.KimA.YangC. P.YuT. S.KernieS. G. (2016). Apolipoprotein E regulates injury-induced activation of hippocampal neural stem and progenitor cells.J. Neurotrauma33362–374. 10.1089/neu.2014.3860

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 100

  HoppertonK. E.TrepanierM. O.GiulianoV.BazinetR. P. (2016). Brain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids modulate microglia cell number and morphology in response to intracerebroventricular amyloid-beta 1-40 in mice.J. Neuroinflammation13:257.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  ItoJ.NagayasuY.MiuraY.YokoyamaS.MichikawaM. (2014). Astrocytes endogenous apoE generates HDL-like lipoproteins using previously synthesized cholesterol through interaction with ABCA1.Brain Res.15701–12. 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.04.037

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102

  JakovcevskiI.FilipovicR.MoZ.RakicS.ZecevicN. (2009). Oligodendrocyte development and the onset of myelination in the human fetal brain.Front. Neuroanat.3:5. 10.3389/neuro.05.005.2009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  JandaE.BoiL.CartaA. R. (2018). Microglial phagocytosis and its regulation: a therapeutic target in Parkinson’s disease?Front. Mol. Neurosci.11:144. 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00144

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  JayT. R.von SauckenV. E.LandrethG. E. (2017). TREM2 in neurodegenerative diseases.Mol. Neurodegener.12:56. 10.1186/s13024-017-0197-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105

  JenkinsC. M.MancusoD. J.YanW.SimsH. F.GibsonB.GrossR. W. (2004). Identification, cloning, expression, and purification of three novel human calcium-independent phospholipase A2 family members possessing triacylglycerol lipase and acylglycerol transacylase activities.J. Biol. Chem.27948968–48975. 10.1074/jbc.m407841200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  JhaA. K.HuangS. C.SergushichevA.LampropoulouV.IvanovaY.LoginichevaE.et al (2015). Network integration of parallel metabolic and transcriptional data reveals metabolic modules that regulate macrophage polarization.Immunity42419–430. 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.02.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  JiangT.TanL.ZhuX. C.ZhangQ. Q.CaoL.TanM. S.et al (2014). Upregulation of TREM2 ameliorates neuropathology and rescues spatial cognitive impairment in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease.Neuropsychopharmacology392949–2962. 10.1038/npp.2014.164

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  JungS.AlibertiJ.GraemmelP.SunshineM. J.KreutzbergG. W.SherA.et al (2000). Analysis of fractalkine receptor CX(3)CR1 function by targeted deletion and green fluorescent protein reporter gene insertion.Mol. Cell. Biol.204106–4114. 10.1128/mcb.20.11.4106-4114.2000

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  KangE. B.KooJ. H.JangY. C.YangC. H.LeeY.Cosio-LimaL. M.et al (2016). Neuroprotective effects of endurance exercise against high-fat diet-induced hippocampal neuroinflammation.J. Neuroendocrinol.28. 10.1111/jne.12385

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  KangJ. X. (2007). Fat-1 transgenic mice: a new model for omega-3 research.Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids77263–267. 10.1016/j.plefa.2007.10.010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  KauppinenT. M.SwansonR. A. (2005). Poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase-1 promotes microglial activation, proliferation, and matrix metalloproteinase-9-mediated neuron death.J. Immunol.174:2288. 10.4049/jimmunol.174.4.2288

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  KellyB.O’NeillL. A. (2015). Metabolic reprogramming in macrophages and dendritic cells in innate immunity.Cell Res.25771–784. 10.1038/cr.2015.68

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113

  Keren-ShaulH.SpinradA.WeinerA.Matcovitch-NatanO.Dvir-SzternfeldR.UllandT. K.et al (2017). A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of Alzheimer’s disease.Cell1691276–1290.e17. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.018

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  KierdorfK.ErnyD.GoldmannT.SanderV.SchulzC.PerdigueroE. G.et al (2013). Microglia emerge from erythromyeloid precursors via Pu.1- and Irf8-dependent pathways.Nat. Neurosci.16273–280. 10.1038/nn.3318

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  Klesney-TaitJ.TurnbullI. R.ColonnaM. (2006). The TREM receptor family and signal integration.Nat. Immunol.71266–1273. 10.1038/ni1411

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  KliewerS. A.LenhardJ. M.WillsonT. M.PatelI.MorrisD. C.LehmannJ. M. (1995). A prostaglandin J2 metabolite binds peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and promotes adipocyte differentiation.Cell83813–819. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90194-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  KopperT. J.GenselJ. C. (2018). Myelin as an inflammatory mediator: myelin interactions with complement, macrophages, and microglia in spinal cord injury.J. Neurosci. Res.96969–977. 10.1002/jnr.24114

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  KumarM.RoeK.NerurkarP. V.OrilloB.ThompsonK. S.VermaS.et al (2014). Reduced immune cell infiltration and increased pro-inflammatory mediators in the brain of Type 2 diabetic mouse model infected with West Nile virus.J. Neuroinflammation11:80. 10.1186/1742-2094-11-80

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  LacorP. N.BunielM. C.ChangL.FernandezS. J.GongY.ViolaK. L.et al (2004). Synaptic Targeting by Alzheimer’s-Related Amyloid β Oligomers.J. Neurosci.2410191–10200. 10.1523/jneurosci.3432-04.2004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  LaDuM. J.FaldutoM. T.ManelliA. M.ReardonC. A.GetzG. S.FrailD. E. (1994). Isoform-specific binding of apolipoprotein E to beta-amyloid.J. Biol. Chem.26923403–23406.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 121

  LambertJ. C.HeathS.EvenG.CampionD.SleegersK.HiltunenM.et al (2009). Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and CR1 associated with Alzheimer’s disease.Nat. Genet.411094–1099. 10.1038/ng.439

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  LangstonP. K.ShibataM.HorngT. (2017). Metabolism supports macrophage activation.Front. Immunol.8:61. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00061

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  LavrnjaI.SmiljanicK.SavicD.Mladenovic-DjordjevicA.TesovicK.KanazirS.et al (2017). Expression profiles of cholesterol metabolism-related genes are altered during development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in the rat spinal cord.Sci. Rep.7:2702. 10.1038/s41598-017-02638-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  LawsonL. J.PerryV. H.DriP.GordonS. (1990). Heterogeneity in the distribution and morphology of microglia in the normal adult mouse brain.Neuroscience39151–170. 10.1016/0306-4522(90)90229-w

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  LayéS.MadoreC.St-AmourI.DelpechJ.JoffreC.NadjarA.et al (2015). N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid and neuroinflammation in aging and Alzheimer’s disease.Nutr. Aging333–47. 10.3233/nua-150049

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  LayéS.NadjarA.JoffreC.BazinetR. P. (2018). Anti-inflammatory effects of omega-3 fatty acids in the brain: physiological mechanisms and relevance to pharmacology.Pharmacol. Rev.70:12. 10.1124/pr.117.014092

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127

  LeoniV.NuryT.VejuxA.ZarroukA.CacciaC.DebbabiM.et al (2017). Mitochondrial dysfunctions in 7-ketocholesterol-treated 158N oligodendrocytes without or with alpha-tocopherol: impacts on the cellular profil of tricarboxylic cycle-associated organic acids, long chain saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, oxysterols, cholesterol and cholesterol precursors.J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.16996–110. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2016.03.029

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128

  LessardC. B.MalnikS. L.ZhouY.LaddT. B.CruzP. E.RanY.et al (2018). High-affinity interactions and signal transduction between Abeta oligomers and TREM2.EMBO Mol. Med.10:e9027. 10.15252/emmm.201809027

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 129

  LiB. L.LiX. L.DuanZ. J.LeeO.LinS.MaZ. M.et al (1999). Human acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase-1 (ACAT-1) gene organization and evidence that the 4.3-kilobase ACAT-1 mRNA is produced from two different chromosomes.J. Biol. Chem.27411060–11071. 10.1074/jbc.274.16.11060

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130

  LiQ.BarresB. A. (2018). Microglia and macrophages in brain homeostasis and disease.Nat. Rev. Immunol.18225–242. 10.1038/nri.2017.125

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 131

  LiQ.ChengZ.ZhouL.DarmanisS.NeffN. F.OkamotoJ.et al (2019). Developmental heterogeneity of microglia and brain myeloid cells revealed by deep single-cell RNA sequencing.Neuron101207–223.e10. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.12.006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 132

  LiX.MontineK. S.KeeneC. D.MontineT. J. (2015). Different mechanisms of apolipoprotein E isoform-dependent modulation of prostaglandin E2 production and triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) expression after innate immune activation of microglia.FASEB J.291754–1762. 10.1096/fj.14-262683

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 133

  LiZ.ZhangJ.SunH. (2015). Increased plasma levels of phospholipid in Parkinson’s disease with mild cognitive impairment.J. Clin. Neurosci.221268–1271. 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.02.013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134

  LiangK. J.LeeJ. E.WangY. D.MaW.FontainhasA. M.FarissR. N.et al (2009). Regulation of dynamic behavior of retinal microglia by CX3CR1 signaling.Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.504444–4451. 10.1167/iovs.08-3357

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 135

  LitmanG. W.CannonJ. P.RastJ. P. (2005). New insights into alternative mechanisms of immune receptor diversification.Adv. Immunol.87209–236. 10.1016/s0065-2776(05)87006-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136

  Loncarevic-VasiljkovicN.PesicV.TodorovicS.PopicJ.SmiljanicK.MilanovicD.et al (2012). Caloric restriction suppresses microglial activation and prevents neuroapoptosis following cortical injury in rats.PLoS One7:e37215. 10.1371/journal.pone.0037215

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 137

  LukiwW. J.BazanN. G. (2000). Neuroinflammatory signaling upregulation in Alzheimer’s disease.Neurochem. Res.251173–1184.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 138

  LundE. G.GuileyardoJ. M.RussellD. W. (1999). cDNA cloning of cholesterol 24-hydroxylase, a mediator of cholesterol homeostasis in the brain.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.967238–7243. 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7238

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 139

  LyonsM. A.BrownA. J. (2000). Metabolism of 7-ketocholesterol by sterol 27-hydroxylase in human hepatic cells.Atherosclerosis151:291. 10.1016/s0021-9150(00)81320-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 140

  MaD. W.NgoV.HuotP. S.KangJ. X. (2006). N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids endogenously synthesized in fat-1 mice are enriched in the mammary gland.Lipids4135–39. 10.1007/s11745-006-5067-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 141

  MahleyR. W. (2016). Central nervous system lipoproteins: ApoE and regulation of cholesterol metabolism.Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.361305–1315. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.307023

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 142

  MahleyR. W.RallS. C.Jr. (2000). Apolipoprotein E: far more than a lipid transport protein.Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet.1507–537. 10.1146/annurev.genom.1.1.507

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 143

  MalandrinoM. I.FuchoR.WeberM.Calderon-DominguezM.MirJ. F.ValcarcelL.et al (2015). Enhanced fatty acid oxidation in adipocytes and macrophages reduces lipid-induced triglyceride accumulation and inflammation.Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.308E756–E769. 10.1152/ajpendo.00362.2014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 144

  MarquerC.DevaugesV.CossecJ. C.LiotG.LecartS.SaudouF.et al (2011). Local cholesterol increase triggers amyloid precursor protein-Bace1 clustering in lipid rafts and rapid endocytosis.FASEB J.251295–1305. 10.1096/fj.10-168633

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 145

  MathewsE. S.AppelB. (2016). Cholesterol biosynthesis supports myelin gene expression and axon ensheathment through modulation of P13K/Akt/mTor signaling.J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci.367628–7639. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0726-16.2016

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 146

  MathysH.AdaikkanC.GaoF.YoungJ. Z.ManetE.HembergM.et al (2017). Temporal tracking of microglia activation in neurodegeneration at single-cell resolution.Cell Rep.21366–380. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.039

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 147

  MauchD. H.NaglerK.SchumacherS.GoritzC.MullerE. C.OttoA.et al (2001). CNS synaptogenesis promoted by glia-derived cholesterol.Science2941354–1357. 10.1126/science.294.5545.1354

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 148

  MauererR.WalczakY.LangmannT. (2009). Comprehensive mRNA profiling of lipid-related genes in microglia and macrophages using taqman arrays.Methods Mol. Biol.580187–201. 10.1007/978-1-60761-325-1_10

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 149

  MehtaM. M.WeinbergS. E.ChandelN. S. (2017). Mitochondrial control of immunity: beyond ATP.Nat. Rev. Immunol.17608–620. 10.1038/nri.2017.66

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 150

  MitiæT.AndrewR.WalkerB. R.HadokeP. W. F. (2013). 11β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 contributes to the regulation of 7-oxysterol levels in the arterial wall through the inter-conversion of 7-ketocholesterol and 7β-hydroxycholesterol.Biochimie95548–555. 10.1016/j.biochi.2012.08.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 151

  MizutaniM.PinoP. A.SaederupN.CharoI. F.RansohoffR. M.CardonaA. E. (2012). The fractalkine receptor but not CCR2 is present on microglia from embryonic development throughout adulthood.J. Immunol.18829–36. 10.4049/jimmunol.1100421

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 152

  MorariJ.AnheG. F.NascimentoL. F.de MouraR. F.RazolliD.SolonC.et al (2014). Fractalkine (CX3CL1) is involved in the early activation of hypothalamic inflammation in experimental obesity.Diabetes633770–3784. 10.2337/db13-1495

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153

  MorellQ. R. (1999). “Characteristic composition of myelin,” in Basic Neurochemistry: Molecular, Cellular and Medical AspectsedsAlbersA.B.SiegelR. W. (Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven).

  • Google Scholar

• 154

  MudoG.FrinchiM.NuzzoD.ScadutoP.PlesciaF.MassentiM. F.et al (2019). Anti-inflammatory and cognitive effects of interferon-beta1a (IFNbeta1a) in a rat model of Alzheimer’s disease.J. Neuroinflammation16:44. 10.1186/s12974-019-1417-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 155

  MurphyE. J. (2017). The blood-brain barrier and protein-mediated fatty acid uptake: role of the blood-brain barrier as a metabolic barrier: an editorial comment for ‘The blood-brain barrier fatty acid transport protein 1 (FATP1/SLC27A1) supplies docosahexaenoic acid to the brain, and insulin facilitates transport’.J. Neurochem.141324–329. 10.1111/jnc.14000

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 156

  NamgaladzeD.BruneB. (2016). Macrophage fatty acid oxidation and its roles in macrophage polarization and fatty acid-induced inflammation.Biochim. Biophys. Acta18611796–1807. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2016.09.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 157

  NamgaladzeD.LipsS.LeikerT. J.MurphyR. C.EkroosK.FerreirosN.et al (2014). Inhibition of macrophage fatty acid beta-oxidation exacerbates palmitate-induced inflammatory and endoplasmic reticulum stress responses.Diabetologia571067–1077. 10.1007/s00125-014-3173-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 158

  NaruseM.IshizakiY.IkenakaK.TanakaA.HitoshiS. (2017). Origin of oligodendrocytes in mammalian forebrains: a revised perspective.J. Physiol. Sci. JPS6763–70. 10.1007/s12576-016-0479-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 159

  NathanaelJ. S.GarmireL. X.McDonaldJ. G.MyersD. S.MilneS. B.ShibataN.et al (2012). Regulated accumulation of desmosterol integrates macrophage lipid metabolism and inflammatory responses.Cell151138–152. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.054

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 160

  NauR.RibesS.DjukicM.EiffertH. (2014). Strategies to increase the activity of microglia as efficient protectors of the brain against infections.Front. Cell. Neurosci.8:138. 10.3389/fncel.2014.00138

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 161

  NguyenL. N.MaD.ShuiG.WongP.Cazenave-GassiotA.ZhangX.et al (2014). Mfsd2a is a transporter for the essential omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid.Nature509503–506. 10.1038/nature13241

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 162

  NiewegK.SchallerH.PfriegerF. W. (2009). Marked differences in cholesterol synthesis between neurons and glial cells from postnatal rats.J. Neurochem.109125–134. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.05917.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 163

  NimmerjahnA.KirchhoffF.HelmchenF. (2005). Resting microglial cells are highly dynamic surveillants of brain parenchyma in vivo.Science3081314–1318. 10.1126/science.1110647

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 164

  NishitsujiK.HosonoT.UchimuraK.MichikawaM. (2011). Lipoprotein lipase is a novel amyloid beta (Abeta)-binding protein that promotes glycosaminoglycan-dependent cellular uptake of Abeta in astrocytes.J. Biol. Chem.2866393–6401. 10.1074/jbc.M110.172106

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 165

  OchockaN.SegitP.WalentynowiczK. A.WojnickiK.CyranowskiS.SwatlerJ.et al (2019). Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals functional heterogeneity and sex differences of glioma-associated brain macrophages.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/752949

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 166

  OlahM.AmorS.BrouwerN.VinetJ.EggenB.BiberK.et al (2012). Identification of a microglia phenotype supportive of remyelination.Glia60306–321. 10.1002/glia.21266

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 167

  PanX.-D.ZhuY.-G.LinN.ZhangJ.YeQ.-Y.HuangH.-P.et al (2011). Microglial phagocytosis induced by fibrillar β-amyloid is attenuated by oligomeric β-amyloid: implications for Alzheimer’s disease.Mol. Neurodegener.6:45. 10.1186/1750-1326-6-45

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 168

  PanayiotouE.FellaE.PapacharalambousR.MalasS.SaraivaM. J.KyriakidesT. (2017). C1q ablation exacerbates amyloid deposition: a study in a transgenic mouse model of ATTRV30M amyloid neuropathy.PLoS One12:e0175767. 10.1371/journal.pone.0175767

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 169

  PaolicelliR. C.BolascoG.PaganiF.MaggiL.ScianniM.PanzanelliP.et al (2011). Synaptic pruning by microglia is necessary for normal brain development.Science333:1456. 10.1126/science.1202529

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 170

  PocivavsekA.BurnsM. P.RebeckG. W. (2009). Low-density lipoprotein receptors regulate microglial inflammation through c-Jun N-terminal kinase.Glia57444–453. 10.1002/glia.20772

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 171

  PosokhovaE. N.KhoshchenkoO. M.ChasovskikhM. I.PivovarovaE. N.DushkinM. I. (2008). Lipid synthesis in macrophages during inflammation in vivo: effect of agonists of peroxisome proliferator activated receptors alpha and gamma and of retinoid X receptors.Biochemistry (Mosc.)73296–304. 10.1134/s0006297908030097

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 172

  PrinzM.ErnyD.HagemeyerN. (2017). Ontogeny and homeostasis of CNS myeloid cells.Nat. Immunol.18:385. 10.1038/ni.3703

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 173

  PurdonA. D.RosenbergerT. A.ShettyH. U.RapoportS. I. (2002). Energy consumption by phospholipid metabolism in mammalian brain.Neurochem. Res.271641–1647.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 174

  RaineC. S.ScheinbergL.WaltzJ. M. (1981). Multiple sclerosis. Oligodendrocyte survival and proliferation in an active established lesion.Lab. Invest.45534–546.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 175

  RamboldA. S.PearceE. L. (2018). Mitochondrial dynamics at the interface of immune cell metabolism and function.Trends Immunol.396–18. 10.1016/j.it.2017.08.006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 176

  RansohoffR. M. (2016). A polarizing question: do M1 and M2 microglia exist?Nat. Neurosci.19987–991. 10.1038/nn.4338

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 177

  RapoportS. I. (1999). In vivo fatty acid incorporation into brain phospholipids in relation to signal transduction and membrane remodeling.Neurochem. Res.241403–1415.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 178

  RealeM.Sanchez-RamonS. (2017). Lipids at the cross-road of autoimmunity in multiple sclerosis.Curr. Med. Chem.24176–192. 10.2174/0929867324666161123093606

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 179

  ReichwaldJ.DannerS.WiederholdK. H.StaufenbielM. (2009). Expression of complement system components during aging and amyloid deposition in APP transgenic mice.J. Neuroinflammation6:35. 10.1186/1742-2094-6-35

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 180

  RenL.RenX. (2016). Meta-analyses of four polymorphisms of lipoprotein lipase associated with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease.Neurosci. Lett.61973–78. 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.03.021

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 181

  RiddellD. R.ChristieG.HussainI.DingwallC. (2001). Compartmentalization of beta-secretase (Asp2) into low-buoyant density, noncaveolar lipid rafts.Curr. Biol.111288–1293. 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00394-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 182

  RobinsonP. J.NoronhaJ.DeGeorgeJ. J.FreedL. M.NariaiT.RapoportS. I. (1992). A quantitative method for measuring regional in vivo fatty-acid incorporation into and turnover within brain phospholipids: review and critical analysis.Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev.17187–214. 10.1016/0165-0173(92)90016-f

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 183

  RosenbauerF.TenenD. G. (2007). Transcription factors in myeloid development: balancing differentiation with transformation.Nat. Rev. Immunol.7105–117. 10.1038/nri2024

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 184

  RossB. M.MamaliasN.MoszczynskaA.RajputA. H.KishS. J. (2001). Elevated activity of phospholipid biosynthetic enzymes in substantia nigra of patients with Parkinson’s disease.Neuroscience102899–904. 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00501-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 185

  SaherG.BruggerB.Lappe-SiefkeC.MobiusW.TozawaR.WehrM. C.et al (2005). High cholesterol level is essential for myelin membrane growth.Nat. Neurosci.8468–475. 10.1038/nn1426

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 186

  SalminenA.KaarnirantaK. (2009). Siglec receptors and hiding plaques in Alzheimer’s disease.J. Mol. Med. (Berl.)87697–701. 10.1007/s00109-009-0472-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 187

  SchaferD. P.LehrmanE. K.KautzmanA. G.KoyamaR.MardinlyA. R.YamasakiR.et al (2012). Microglia sculpt postnatal neural circuits in an activity and complement-dependent manner.Neuron74691–705. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.026

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 188

  SchwinkendorfD. R.TsatsosN. G.GosnellB. A.MashekD. G. (2011). Effects of central administration of distinct fatty acids on hypothalamic neuropeptide expression and energy metabolism.Int. J. Obes. (Lond.)35336–344. 10.1038/ijo.2010.159

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 189

  SekarA.BialasA. R.de RiveraH.DavisA.HammondT. R.KamitakiN.et al (2016). Schizophrenia risk from complex variation of complement component 4.Nature530177–183. 10.1038/nature16549

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 190

  SellgrenC. M.GraciasJ.WatmuffB.BiagJ. D.ThanosJ. M.WhittredgeP. B.et al (2019). Increased synapse elimination by microglia in schizophrenia patient-derived models of synaptic pruning.Nat. Neurosci.22374–385. 10.1038/s41593-018-0334-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 191

  SerhanC. N. (2014). Pro-resolving lipid mediators are leads for resolution physiology.Nature51092–101. 10.1038/nature13479

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 192

  ShiQ.ChowdhuryS.MaR.LeK. X.HongS.CaldaroneB. J.et al (2017). Complement C3 deficiency protects against neurodegeneration in aged plaque-rich APP/PS1 mice.Sci. Transl. Med.9:eaaf6295. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf6295

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 193

  ShirotaniK.HoriY.YoshizakiR.HiguchiE.ColonnaM.SaitoT.et al (2019). Aminophospholipids are signal-transducing TREM2 ligands on apoptotic cells.Sci. Rep.9:7508. 10.1038/s41598-019-43535-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 194

  SiegertE.PaulF.RotheM.WeylandtK. H. (2017). The effect of omega-3 fatty acids on central nervous system remyelination in fat-1 mice.BMC Neurosci.18:19. 10.1186/s12868-016-0312-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 195

  SimopoulosA. P. (2008). The importance of the omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio in cardiovascular disease and other chronic diseases.Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood)233674–688. 10.3181/0711-MR-311

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 196

  SimopoulosA. P. (2011). Evolutionary aspects of diet: the omega-6/omega-3 ratio and the brain.Mol. Neurobiol.44203–215. 10.1007/s12035-010-8162-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 197

  SimopoulosA. P. (2016). An increase in the omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio Increases the risk for obesity.Nutrients8:128. 10.3390/nu8030128

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 198

  SinghS.MishraA.SrivastavaN.ShuklaR.ShuklaS. (2018). Acetyl-l-Carnitine via upegulating dopamine D1 receptor and attenuating microglial activation prevents neuronal loss and improves memory functions in Parkinsonian Rats.Mol. Neurobiol.55583–602. 10.1007/s12035-016-0293-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 199

  SongG. J.NamY.JoM.JungM.KooJ. Y.ChoW.et al (2016). A novel small-molecule agonist of PPAR-gamma potentiates an anti-inflammatory M2 glial phenotype.Neuropharmacology109159–169. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.06.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 200

  StukasS.RobertJ.LeeM.KulicI.CarrM.TourignyK.et al (2014). Intravenously injected human apolipoprotein A-I rapidly enters the central nervous system via the choroid plexus.J. Am. Heart Assoc.3:e001156. 10.1161/JAHA.114.001156

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 201

  TahaA. Y.ChangL.ChenM. (2016). Threshold changes in rat brain docosahexaenoic acid incorporation and concentration following graded reductions in dietary alpha-linolenic acid.Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids10526–34. 10.1016/j.plefa.2015.12.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 202

  TambuyzerB. R.PonsaertsP.NouwenE. J. (2009). Microglia: gatekeepers of central nervous system immunology.J. Leukoc. Biol.85352–370. 10.1189/jlb.0608385

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 203

  ThalerJ. P.YiC. X.SchurE. A.GuyenetS. J.HwangB. H.DietrichM. O.et al (2012). Obesity is associated with hypothalamic injury in rodents and humans.J. Clin. Invest.122153–162. 10.1172/JCI59660

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 204

  TrépanierM.-O.HoppertonK. E.OrrS. K.BazinetR. P. (2016). N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in animal models with neuroinflammation: an update.Eur. J. Pharmacol.785187–206. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.05.045

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 205

  TuT. H.KimH.YangS.KimJ. K.KimJ. G. (2019). Linoleic acid rescues microglia inflammation triggered by saturated fatty acid.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.513201–206. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.03.047

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 206

  TuY. F.LuP. J.HuangC. C.HoC. J.ChouY. P. (2012). Moderate dietary restriction reduces p53-mediated neurovascular damage and microglia activation after hypoxic ischemia in neonatal brain.Stroke43491–498. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.629931

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 207

  van de KraatsC.KillesteinJ.PopescuV.RijkersE.VrenkenH.LütjohannD.et al (2013). Oxysterols and cholesterol precursors correlate to magnetic resonance imaging measures of neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis.Mult. Scler. J.20412–417. 10.1177/1352458513499421

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 208

  Van den BosscheJ.SaraberD. L. (2018). Metabolic regulation of macrophages in tissues.Cell. Immunol.33054–59. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2018.01.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 209

  van der KantR.LangnessV. F.HerreraC. M.WilliamsD. A.FongL. K.LeestemakerY.et al (2019). Cholesterol metabolism is a druggable axis that independently regulates tau and amyloid-beta in iPSC-derived Alzheimer’s disease neurons.Cell Stem Cell24:e9. 10.1016/j.stem.2018.12.013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 210

  Van HoveH.MartensL.ScheyltjensI.De VlaminckK.Pombo AntunesA. R.PrijckS. De, et al. (2019). A single-cell atlas of mouse brain macrophages reveals unique transcriptional identities shaped by ontogeny and tissue environment.Nat. Neurosci.221021–1035. 10.1038/s41593-019-0393-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 211

  VanceJ. E.CampenotR. B.VanceD. E. (2000). The synthesis and transport of lipids for axonal growth and nerve regeneration.Biochim. Biophys. Acta148684–96. 10.1016/s1388-1981(00)00050-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 212

  ViaderA.OgasawaraD.JoslynC. M.Sanchez-AlavezM.MoriS.NguyenW.et al (2016). A chemical proteomic atlas of brain serine hydrolases identifies cell type-specific pathways regulating neuroinflammation.eLife5:e12345. 10.7554/eLife.12345

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 213

  WakeH.MoorhouseA. J.JinnoS.KohsakaS.NabekuraJ. (2009). Resting microglia directly monitor the functional state of synapses in vivo and determine the fate of ischemic terminals.J. Neurosci.293974–3980. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4363-08.2009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 214

  WangM. D.KissR. S.FranklinV.McBrideH. M.WhitmanS. C.MarcelY. L. (2007). Different cellular traffic of LDL-cholesterol and acetylated LDL-cholesterol leads to distinct reverse cholesterol transport pathways.J. Lipid Res.48633–645. 10.1194/jlr.m600470-jlr200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 215

  WangY.CellaM.MallinsonK.UlrichJ. D.YoungK. L.RobinetteM. L.et al (2015). TREM2 lipid sensing sustains the microglial response in an Alzheimer’s disease model.Cell1601061–1071. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.049

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 216

  WarburgO.WindF.NegeleinE. (1927). The metabolism of tumors in the body.J. Gen. Physiol.8519–530. 10.1085/jgp.8.6.519

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 217

  WarshawJ. B.TerryM. L. (1976). Cellular energy metabolism during fetal development. VI. Fatty acid oxidation by developing brain.Dev. Biol.52161–166. 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90016-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 218

  WeiL.SunC.LeiM.LiG.YiL.LuoF.et al (2013). Activation of Wnt/β-catenin pathway by exogenous Wnt1 protects SH-SY5Y cells against 6-hydroxydopamine toxicity.J. Mol. Neurosci.49105–115. 10.1007/s12031-012-9900-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 219

  WeinhardL.di BartolomeiG.BolascoG.MachadoP.SchieberN. L.NeniskyteU.et al (2018). Microglia remodel synapses by presynaptic trogocytosis and spine head filopodia induction.Nat. Commun.9:1228. 10.1038/s41467-018-03566-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 220

  WestA. P.BrodskyI. E.RahnerC.WooD. K.Erdjument-BromageH.TempstP.et al (2011). TLR signalling augments macrophage bactericidal activity through mitochondrial ROS.Nature472476–480. 10.1038/nature09973

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 221

  WisniewskiT.CastanoE. M.GolabekA.VogelT.FrangioneB. (1994). Acceleration of Alzheimer’s fibril formation by apolipoprotein E in vitro.Am. J. Pathol.1451030–1035.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 222

  WlodarczykA.HoltmanI. R.KruegerM.YogevN.BruttgerJ.KhorooshiR.et al (2017). A novel microglial subset plays a key role in myelinogenesis in developing brain.EMBO J.363292–3308. 10.15252/embj.201696056

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 223

  WollerS. A.ChoiS.-H.AnE. J.LowH.SchneiderD. A.RamachandranR.et al (2018). Inhibition of neuroinflammation by AIBP: spinal effects upon facilitated pain states.Cell Rep.232667–2677. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.110

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 224

  WongB. H.ChanJ. P.Cazenave-GassiotA.PohR. W.FooJ. C.GalamD. L. A.et al (2016). Mfsd2a is a transporter for the essential ω-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in eye and is important for photoreceptor cell development.J. Biol. Chem.29110501–10514. 10.1074/jbc.M116.721340

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 225

  WuD.SaninD. E.EvertsB.ChenQ.QiuJ.BuckM. D.et al (2016). Type 1 interferons induce changes in core metabolism that are critical for immune function.Immunity441325–1336. 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.06.006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 226

  WuL.ZhaoL. (2016). ApoE2 and Alzheimer’s disease: time to take a closer look.Neural. Regen. Res.11412–413.

  • Google Scholar

• 227

  XicoyH.WieringaB.MartensG. J. M. (2019). The role of lipids in Parkinson’s disease.Cells8:27.

  • Google Scholar

• 228

  XuQ.BernardoA.WalkerD.KanegawaT.MahleyR. W.HuangY. (2006). Profile and regulation of apolipoprotein E (ApoE) expression in the CNS in mice with targeting of green fluorescent protein gene to the ApoE locus.J. Neurosci.264985–4994. 10.1523/jneurosci.5476-05.2006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 229

  YamashitaA.HayashiY.MatsumotoN.Nemoto-SasakiY.OkaS.TanikawaT.et al (2014). Glycerophosphate/acylglycerophosphate acyltransferases.Biology3801–830. 10.3390/biology3040801

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 230

  YangD. S.StavridesP.SaitoM.KumarA.Rodriguez-NavarroJ. A.PawlikM.et al (2014). Defective macroautophagic turnover of brain lipids in the TgCRND8 Alzheimer mouse model: prevention by correcting lysosomal proteolytic deficits.Brain1373300–3318. 10.1093/brain/awu278

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 231

  YeJ.DeBose-BoydR. A. (2011). Regulation of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis.Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.3:a004754. 10.1101/cshperspect.a004754

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 232

  YehF. L.WangY.TomI.GonzalezL. C.ShengM. (2016). TREM2 binds to apolipoproteins, including APOE and CLU/APOJ, and thereby facilitates uptake of amyloid-beta by microglia.Neuron91328–340. 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.015

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 233

  ZhangE.KimJ.-J.ShinN.YinY.NanY.XuY.et al (2017). High omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in fat-1 mice reduce inflammatory pain.J. Med. Food20535–541. 10.1089/jmf.2016.3871

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 234

  ZhangJ.ZhangX.WangL.YangC. (2017). High performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) based quantitative lipidomics study of ganglioside-NANA-3 plasma to establish its association with Parkinson’s disease patients.Med. Sci. Monit.235345–5353. 10.12659/msm.904399

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 235

  ZhangY.ChenK.SloanS. A.BennettM. L.ScholzeA. R.O’KeeffeS.et al (2014). An RNA-sequencing transcriptome and splicing database of glia, neurons, and vascular cells of the cerebral cortex.J. Neurosci.3411929–11947. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1860-14.2014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 236

  ZhangY.SloanS. A.ClarkeL. E.CanedaC.PlazaC. A.BlumenthalP. D.et al (2016). Purification and characterization of progenitor and mature human astrocytes reveals transcriptional and functional differences with mouse.Neuron8937–53. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 237

  ZhaoC.Dahlman-WrightK. (2010). Liver X receptor in cholesterol metabolism.J. Endocrinol.204233–240. 10.1677/JOE-09-0271

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 238

  ZiermansT. B.SchothorstP. F.SchnackH. G.KoolschijnP. C.KahnR. S.van EngelandH.et al (2012). Progressive structural brain changes during development of psychosis.Schizophr. Bull.38519–530. 10.1093/schbul/sbq113

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 239

  ZikoI.De LucaS.DinanT.BarwoodJ. M.SominskyL.CaiG.et al (2014). Neonatal overfeeding alters hypothalamic microglial profiles and central responses to immune challenge long-term.Brain. Behav. Immun.4132–43. 10.1016/j.bbi.2014.06.014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar