ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Agron., 29 September 2020

Sec. Disease Management

Volume 2 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2020.547758

Trichoderma Afroharzianum Ear Rot–A New Disease on Maize in Europe

  • 1. Plant Pathology and Crop Protectison, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany

  • 2. Molecular Phytopathology and Mycotoxin Research, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany

Article metrics

View details

55

Citations

14,8k

Views

2,1k

Downloads

Abstract

Trichoderma species are widespread filamentous fungi in soils, on plant roots and decaying plant residues. Due to their strong competitiveness and mycoparasitic activity against other fungi, particular strains of Trichoderma sp. are used in agriculture as biocontrol agents against plant pathogens. Commercial products based on strains of T. harzianum or T. afroharzianum have been applied to control Rhizoctonia spp., Fusarium spp., and Phytophthora spp. in various crops. In 2018, however, severe infections of Trichoderma on maize ears were recorded for the first time in a field in Southern Germany. Infected maize cobs were sampled, the fungus was isolated in pure culture and preliminarily identified microscopically as T. harzianum. After silk channel inoculation in the greenhouse, ear rot disease of high severity was observed. In addition to fungal colonization, the dry matter content in cobs was significantly reduced compared to water inoculated cobs. In 2018 and 2019, a total of 13 T. harzianum isolates from maize cobs and maize stalks were isolated and tested, for pathogenicity on maize plants in the greenhouse, compared to several reference isolates. Four isolates proved to be highly aggressive, two biocontrol isolates, Trichodex (T39), and strain T12, induced slight infection and eleven isolates were non-pathogenic. After sequencing of the translation elongation factor-1α (tef-1α) and internal transcribes spacers (ITS), the four highly aggressive isolates were reassigned to T. afroharzianum, while the commercial biocontrol isolates Trichodex (T39), and T12, as well as the other non-pathogenic strains belonged to T. harzianum, T. atroviride, or T. tomentosum. This, to our knowledge, is the first report on Trichoderma sp. as a pathogen causing ear rot disease in maize in Europe with the potential to incite significant yield losses. We therefore propose to name this disease as “Trichoderma ear rot on maize”.

Introduction

Members of the genus Trichoderma are classified as imperfect fungi in the division Ascomycota and are ubiquitous in various types of soil. Some species of Trichoderma have biocontrol potential and can suppress pathogen growth by direct and indirect mechanisms including mycoparasitism, antibiosis, induction of host resistance and competition for nutrients and space (Kubicek et al., 2008; Jaklitsch and Voglmayr, 2015; Samuels and Hebbar, 2015; Ghazanfar et al., 2018). Especially, the ability to detoxify zearalenone protects Trichoderma spp. from the chemical defense of Fusarium spp. (Popiel et al., 2014). They can thereby control and antagonize a broad range of economically important plant parasitic pathogens (Ferrigo et al., 2014; Gupta et al., 2014; Harman, 2015). In addition, they may increase plant resilience against drought conditions and promote shoot and root growth (Arora et al., 2003). Harman et al. (2004b) reported a significant yield increase in maize due to Trichoderma treatments. Apart from the control of root and foliar pathogens, Trichoderma spp. enhance nutrient solubilization and uptake as well as root and root hair development (Herrera-Estrella and Chet, 2004; Schuster and Schmoll, 2010).

Trichoderma species have been described as opportunistic, basically avirulent plant symbionts in soil (Harman et al., 2004a); however, a few reports have mentioned Trichoderma as ear rot pathogen on maize in the US (Munkvold and White, 2016; Wise et al., 2016; OSU., 2020). Trichoderma ear rot infection has been characterized by the occurrence of dark, blue-green layers of conidia on and between the kernels of infected ears causing premature germination of the kernels (Wise et al., 2016). In addition, the dry matter content of ears infected with Trichoderma was strongly reduced compared to uninfected ears. The occurrence of Trichoderma ear rot was associated with injuries caused by feeding birds or other mechanical damage in Kentucky and Ohio (Vincelli, 2014).

Surprisingly, in 2018 a severe occurrence of Trichoderma on the maize cobs was recorded at a field site in Southern Germany. Cobs sampled from 20 maize varieties were overgrown with mycelium producing green layers of conidia between the kernels and on the outside of the husk leaves. Similar disease symptoms have been previously observed in Southern Bavaria, after warm, and dry summers.

The aim of the present study was to identify and verify Trichoderma as a new pathogen causing ear rot disease on maize. Therefore, Trichoderma-infected cobs from four locations in Germany and France were sampled, cultured, and microscopically examined as well as analyzed by sequencing the gene for translation elongation factor-1α (tef-1α) and internal transcribes spacers (ITS). Furthermore, pathogenicity of Trichoderma isolates and the impact of infection on dry matter content of maize cobs were tested after artificial inoculation at flowering in the greenhouse.

Materials and Methods

Fungal Isolation and Cultivation

Maize cobs and stalks were collected from naturally infected silage and grain maize in Germany in 2018 and 2019. Thirty randomly chosen kernels from each cob were surface sterilized for 10 min with 0.1% silver nitrate and placed on potato dextrose agar (PDA). The stalk samples were cut in nine slices, surface sterilized as described above and placed on PDA plates. After 2 days, mycelium outgrown from the sample was transferred to PDA plates. Single conidia cultures were produced, and isolates were stored on synthetic low nutrition agar (SNA) plates at 4°C.

Inoculation Procedure

Spores from single spore cultures were transferred to PDA plates containing antibiotics (400 μg/ml streptomycin, Duchefa Biochemie, Haarlem, The Netherlands; 30 μg/ml rifampicin, AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany) and incubated under Near-UV-light (λ = 340–400 nm) at 23°C in a growth chamber. After 2 weeks, sterile water was added to plates and conidia were scraped off with a microscope slide. The conidia suspension was then filtered through gauze and cell density was measured with a Thoma haemocytometer and adjusted to 1 × 106 conidia per ml. Primary ears of maize plants were inoculated seven days after silk channel emergence (BBCH 65). For this purpose, 1 ml of conidia suspension was injected with a syringe (Braun, Melsungen, Germany) into the silk channel between the cob tip and the point where silks emerge from the husk.

Plant Cultivation and Pathogenicity Assessment on Maize Ears

Maize seeds of two varieties were sown in a mixture of soil (potting soil/compost/sand mixture of 1:2:1) in 20 cm diameter pots. Pots were placed in the greenhouse at 23°C under a seasonal day-/night light cycle. Five plants per isolate were inoculated by silk channel injection and five additional plants were inoculated with water, as control. Thirteen Trichoderma isolates originally isolated from maize cobs in the field were compared to four reference strains of T. harzianum (IPP0318, IPP0319, IPP0320, T12), one type strain of T. afroharzianum (CBS 124620) and one strain of T. atroviride (IPP0316) obtained from different fungal collections (see Table 1). In addition, one commercial biocontrol isolate, T39 (Trichodex), and one isolate, T12, with potential biocontrol activity (kindly provided by the Department for Phytopathology of Justus-Liebig-University, Gießen, Germany) were tested. Four weeks (28 dpi) after inoculation, husk leaves of inoculated and control ears were removed, and disease severity was assessed visually according to the EPPO guidelines (European Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization., 2015) as the percentage (0–100%) of the cob surface covered with fungal mycelium. Finally, cobs were weighed and dried for 5 days at 60°C to assess the dry matter content. In addition, isolates were re-isolated and cultured on PDA to confirm the Koch's Postulate.

Table 1

IsolatesSpeciesYearLocationSource
Tri1Trichoderma afroharzianum2018Croix de Pardies (F)Zea mays (cob)!
Tri2Trichoderma afroharzianum2018Kuenzing (D)Z. mays (cob) !
Tri3Trichoderma afroharzianum2018Pocking (D)Z. mays (cob)!
Tri4Trichoderma tomentosum2018Altoetting (D)Z. mays (cob)!
Tri5Trichoderma afroharzianum2019Bernburg (D)Z. mays (cob)!
IPP0316Trichoderma atroviride1976Baby food
IPP0318Trichoderma harzianum1992Mae Hia (T)Soil
IPP0319Trichoderma harzianum1992Chiang Mai (T)Soil
IPP0320Trichoderma harzianum1992Mae Hia (T)Soil
Tri6Trichoderma harzianum2019Kleinwanzleben (D)Z. mays (cob)
Tri7Trichoderma harzianum2019Grucking (D)Z. mays (cob)
Tri8Trichoderma harzianum2019Loeningen (D)Z. mays (cob)
Tri9Trichoderma harzianum2019Loeningen (D)Z. mays (cob)
Tri10Trichoderma harzianum2019Großumstadt (D)Z. mays (cob)
Tri11Trichoderma harzianum2019Pfaffenhofen (D)Z. mays (cob)
Tri12Trichoderma harzianum2019Pfaffenhofen (D)Z. mays (stalk)
Tri14Trichoderma harzianum2019Pfaffenhofen (D)Z. mays (stalk)
T12*Trichoderma harzianum
T39 (Trichodex)Trichoderma harzianumTel Aviv (ISR)
CBS 124620Trichoderma afroharzianumPeruT. cacao

Host, geographic locations, and year of isolation of Trichoderma isolates used in this study.

F, France; D, Germany; T, Thailand; ISR, Israel; IPP-fungal collection of the Plant Pathology Division, University of Goettingen; CBS-fungal collection of the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, NL;

*

provided by the Department of Phytopathology of Justus-Liebig-University, Gießen, Germany; ! (exclamation mark) indicating samples with Trichoderma disease symptoms.

DNA Extraction and Phylogenetic Analysis

Total DNA was extracted from lyophilized mycelium of single spore cultures by using a CTAB-based method described by Brandfass and Karlovsky (2008). Quality and quantity of the extracted DNA was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis (60 min at 4.6 V/cm) and stained with ethidium bromide. Partial translation elongation factor-1α (tef-1α) and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) were used to differentiate within the Trichoderma harzianum complex. Amplification was performed in a peqSTAR96 universal gradient thermocycler (PEQLAB, Erlangen, Germany) using 1:100 dilution of DNA extract in a total reaction volume of 25 μl. Marker genes tef-1α and ITS were amplified with the primers EF1 (ATGGGTAAGGARGACAAGAC) and EF2 (GGARGTACCAGTSATCATGTT) (O'Donnell et al., 1998) and ITS1 (CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA) and ITS4 (TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC) (White et al., 1990), respectively. Reactions were carried out in a mixture of standard Taq reaction buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, pH 8.3 at 25°C; NEB), 100 μM of each deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate, 0.3 μM of each primer, 0.62 U HotStart-polymerase (New England Biolabs), and 1 μL template DNA solution. The final MgCl2 concentration was adjusted to 2 mM. The PCR cycling conditions for amplification of tef-1α included an initial denaturation for 30 s at 95°C; 30 cycles consisting of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 58°C, and 1 min at 68°C; and final extension for 5 min at 68°C. The PCR cycling conditions for amplification of ITS included an initial denaturation for 30 s at 95°C; 10 cycles consisting of 30 s at 94°C, a gradual decrease from 62°C to 53°C (−1°C/cycle) for 40 s, and 1 min at 68°C; 30 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 40 s at 56°C, and 1 min at 68°C; and final extension for 5 min at 68°C. Species were identified by multiple alignment of each sequence with reference sequences using ClustalW (Thompson et al., 1994) in MEGA Version 7.0.2 (Kumar et al., 2016).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted with STATISTICA version 13 (Statistica GmbH, Germany). Differences between means of disease severity was analyzed using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA by 5% probability. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for dry matter content was carried out, followed by Tukey's-HSD-test at the 5% probability level.

Results

Geographic Origin of Samples

In 2018, four isolates from four locations (Altoetting, Pocking, Kuenzing and Croix de Pardies) were obtained from maize cobs in Germany and France and subjected to further identification. In 2019, ten cobs from six locations, mainly from southern Germany, especially Bavaria, and along the Rhine valley (Bernburg, Kleinwanzleben, Grucking, Loeningen, Großumstadt, and Pfaffenhofen), were examined. In addition, two isolates from maize stalks from a single location (Pfaffenhofen) were obtained. Isolates Tri1, Tri2, Tri3, and Tri5 were isolated from maize cobs displaying strong Trichoderma infection, whereas the other Trichoderma isolates were obtained from cobs or stalks that did not induce any visual disease symptoms.

Species Identification

A molecular phylogenetic analysis was performed with thirteen Trichoderma isolates from maize cobs and six isolates obtained from fungal culture collections, based on partial tef1α (Figure 1) and ITS (Supplementary Figure 1). Sequences of 17 species in the T. harzianum complex (Chaverri et al., 2015) were selected from GenBank (Clark et al., 2015). Multiple gene alignments assigned eight isolates (Tri6-Tri12, Tri14) to T. harzianum, four isolates (Tri1-Tri3, Tri5) to the clade T. afroharzianum, and one isolate to T. tomentosum. Strains IPP0318-0320 were verified as T. harzianum and IPP0316 as T. atroviride. Isolates designated as T. harzianum clustered in two separate groups highly supported by bootstrap values. This result was largely confirmed by analysis of ITS sequences. Isolates Tri6-Tri12 an Tri14 showed high similarity to the selected references of T. harzianum, however, two isolates (T12 and T39) formed a separate clade, together with the reference sequence of T. harzianum CBS 226.95 (AY605833). All obtained sequences of T. afroharzianum clustered in one phylogenetic group highly supported by bootstrapping and showed 99.4% (523 out of 526) nucleotide similarity to the tef-1α sequence of T. afroharzianum CBS124620 (FJ463301). Newly obtained sequences were deposited at Genbank under the accession numbers MT793725 to MT793743 for tef-1α and MT793744 to MT793762 for ITS, and sequence alignments were lodged at TreeBASE (http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S26786).

Figure 1

Disease Symptoms and Severity on Maize Ears

Trichoderma strains obtained from maize cobs displayed typical characteristics of this genus on PDA plates, such as initial growth of white mycelium, soon turning into green, and gray-green colonies, while the reverse side of the culture plates stayed uncoloured or light yellow. Trichoderma ear rot infection is characterized by white mycelium growing between the kernels and on the husk leaves with massive production of green to gray-green conidia. Under natural infection in the field, symptoms occurred from the base to the middle part of the cob, covering all kernels, and all layers of husk leaves (Figures 2A–C). No mechanical damage or injuries by birds or insects were observed on infected cobs. After inoculation of ears in the greenhouse, the whole cob, inside and outside of the husk leaves was covered with mycelium, and a green layer of conidia (Figures 2D–F). Some infected cobs in the field as well as in the greenhouse showed premature ripening of the kernels (Figures 2C,E).

Figure 2

After artificial inoculation of the cob in the greenhouse, six isolates were pathogenic on maize ears and ten isolates did not induce any infection. The highest disease severity was observed with T. afroharzianum isolates Tri5 (96.0%), Tri1 (94.0%), Tri2 (91.1%), and Tri3 (78.0%), which overgrew the kernels and husk leaves (Table 2). Isolates T12 and T39 (Trichodex) lead to greenish discoloration only at the tip of the cob. The reference strains of T. afroharzianum (CBS 124620), T. harzianum (IPP0320, IPP0318) and the two remaining strains (IPP0316 and Tri4) as well as the T. harzianum isolates from maize cobs (Tri6, Tri7, Tri8, Tri10, and Tri11) were non-pathogenic on maize. Non-pathogenic strains did not cause any significant reduction in dry matter content compared to water treated, non-infected control cobs. However, the three most aggressive strains Tri2, Tri1, and Tri5 of T. afroharzianum caused significant losses in dry matter content of cobs 28 days after inoculation (Table 1).

Table 2

IsolateDisease severity [%]Dry matter content [%]
Water
Control0.0 ± 0.0a47.9 ± 4.6a
T. harzianum
IPP03200.0 ± 0.0a48.5 ± 2.5a
Tri60.0 ± 0.0a46.5 ± 13.5a
IPP03180.0 ± 0.0a46.2 ± 6.7a
Tri70.0 ± 0.0a41.6 ± 4.7a
T3911.0 ± 6.5b40.4 ± 12.4a
Tri110.0 ± 0.0a39.1 ± 12.9a
Tri80.0 ± 0.0a37.2 ± 6.1a
Tri100.0 ± 0.0a36.7 ± 7.9a
T1214.0 ± 10.8b36.7 ± 5.8a
T. afroharzianum
CBS 1246200.0 ± 0.0a39.7 ± 6.0a
Tri194.0 ± 5.4d26.6 ± 4.1b
Tri291.1 ± 10.5d20.9 ± 7.7b
Tri378.0 ± 22.8c34.3 ± 6.8ab
Tri596.0 ± 8.9d20.3 ± 6.0a
Others
IPP0316 (T. atroviride)0.0 ± 0.0a49.9 ± 15.0a
Tri4 (T. tomentosum)0.0 ± 0.0a45.7 ± 13.2a

Disease severity (%) and dry matter content (%) of maize cobs, 28 days after inoculation.

Means are given with standard deviation. Letters a,b,c,d, ab indicate significant differences between the isolates (α ≤ 0.05).

Discussion

Although Trichoderma is known as a plant symbiont or antagonist of fungal phytopathogens, our findings support previous observations in the US (Munkvold and White, 2016; Wise et al., 2016) that Trichoderma can infect maize cobs and cause ear rot diseases. Molecular-phylogenetic analysis of partial translation elongation factor-1α (tef-1α) and internal transcribes spacer (ITS) genes revealed pathogenic isolates as T. afroharzianum. To the best of our knowledge this is the first report on T. afroharzianum as an ear rot pathogen in Europe. The disease symptoms described in this study are in agreement with the observations by Wise et al. (2016) indicating that infection of Trichoderma appeared as white mold associated with massive production of green or gray-green conidia between the kernels and husk leaves, often involving the entire ear and causing premature ripening of the kernels. In contrast to the report by Munkvold and White (2016), T. afroharzianum infection, in the present study, did not require any previous damage on husk leaves and was not associated with injuries from birds or insects. Furthermore, artificial inoculation studies in the greenhouse confirmed that high disease severity occurred without any mechanical wounding after silk channel injection. Therefore, we conclude that Trichoderma ear rot infection is not a result of, or promoted by mechanical injuries. This new pathogen cannot be regarded as a wound or opportunistic pathogen, as it is clearly able to infect kernel and husk leaf tissue and cause disease without any previous damages. We therefore propose to use the name “Trichoderma ear rot on maize” for this disease.

Highest disease severity and highest losses of dry matter content were observed after inoculation with three T. afroharzianum (Tri1, Tri2, Tri3, and Tri5) strains; however, the reference type strain of T. afroharzianum CBS 124620 did not induce any disease symptoms on maize but may have lost its pathogenicity during cultivation for over 15 years. Otherwise, this may indicate a phylogenetic separation on the species or subspecies level of pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains. Further research is required to clarify the genetic differences between these strains within the T. afroharzianum cluster. Surprisingly, a low-level pathogenicity of the two T. harzianum strains which were considered for use as biocontrol agents was recorded. Although these strains are usually applied to the soil for control of soilborne diseases, the pathogenicity found in our greenhouse experiment with cob inoculation cannot be ignored with regard to risk analysis in the registration of Trichoderma strains as biocontrol agents. The question whether beneficial Trichoderma strains could mutate into aggressive plant pathogens is difficult to determine at this stage and requires further research.

Besides these findings, several epidemiological aspects about Trichoderma ear rot remain to be elucidated. Firstly, it is not known how the conidia of Trichoderma reach and infect the maize ears under natural conditions in the field, which sources of inoculum exist, and whether there are any alternative hosts. Secondly, there are no reports so far about the effect of weather conditions or agronomic practices possibly favoring infection with Trichoderma. The aggressive strains of T. afroharzianum were restricted to warmer regions with enhanced maize production in Southern Germany and along the Rhine valley. This is consistent with our previous observations indicating enhanced Trichoderma infection in the field in years with high mean temperatures and low precipitation such as in 2018 and 2019 in Germany. Furthermore, the potential production of mycotoxins by aggressive strains of Trichoderma awaits examination. Finally, field monitoring to explore the spread of the disease in Europe and yield loss analyses under field conditions are required to assess the economic significance of Trichoderma ear rot disease in maize production.

Statements

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.

Author contributions

AP: conceptualization, resources, and writing—original draft preparation. AP and SS: methodology, validation, investigation, data curation, and visualization. AT, PK, and SS: writing—review and editing. AT: supervision. AT and PK: project administration and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the German Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) (Grant no. 2818208315).

Acknowledgments

We thank Brigitte Jünemann and Chelsea Schreiber for their excellent technical assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fagro.2020.547758/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    AroraD.BridgeP.BhatnagarD. (2003). Fungal Biotechnology in Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

  • 2

    BrandfassC.KarlovskyP. (2008). Upscaled CTAB-based DNA extraction and real-time PCR assays for Fusarium culmorum and F. graminearum DNA in plant material with reduced sampling error. Int. J. Mol. Sci.9, 23062321. 10.3390/ijms9112306

  • 3

    ChaverriP.Branco-RochaF.JaklitschW.GazisR.DegenkolbT.SamuelsG. J. (2015). Systematics of the Trichoderma harzianum species complex and the re-identification of commercial biocontrol strains. Mycologia107, 558590. 10.3852/14-147

  • 4

    ClarkK.Karsch-MizrachiI.LipmanD. J.OstellJ.SyaersE. W. (2015). GenBank. Nucleic Acid Res.44, D6772. 10.1093/nar/gkv1276

  • 5

    European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. (2015). PP 1/285 (1) fusarium ear rot of maize. Bull. OEPP/EPPO Bull.45, 336339. 10.1111/epp.12240

  • 6

    FerrigoD.RaiolaA.PiccoloE.ScopelC.CausinR. (2014). Trichoderma harzianum T22 induces in maize systemic resistance against Fusarium verticillioides. J. Plant Pathol.96, 133142. 10.4454/JPP.V96I1.038

  • 7

    GhazanfarM. U.RazaM.RazaW.QamaM. I. (2018). Trichoderma as potential biocontrol agent, its exploitation in agriculture, a review. Plant Protect. 2, 26171279.

  • 8

    GuptaV. K.SchmollM.Herrera-EstrellaA.UpadhyayR. S.DruzhininaI. S.TuohyM. (2014). Biotechnology and Biology of Trichoderma.Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • 9

    HarmanG. E. (2015). Overview of mechanisms and uses of Trichoderma spp. Phytopathology96, 190194. 10.1094/PHYTO-96-0190

  • 10

    HarmanG. E.HowellC. R.ViterboA.ChetI.LoritoM. (2004a). Trichoderma species opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.2, 4356. 10.1038/nrmicro797

  • 11

    HarmanG. E.PetzoldtR.ComisA.ChenJ. (2004b). Interactions between Trichoderma harzianum strain T22 and maize inbred line Mo17 and effects of these interactions on diseases caused by Pythium ultimum and Colletotrichum graminicola. Biol. Control94, 147153. 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.2.147

  • 12

    Herrera-EstrellaA.ChetI. (2004). The biological control agent Trichoderma from fundamentals to applications, in Handbook of Fungal Biotechnology, 2nd Edn, ed D. Aurora (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press), 147156. 10.1201/9780203913369.ch13

  • 13

    JaklitschW. M.VoglmayrH. (2015). Biodiversity of Trichoderma (Hypocreaceae) ins southern Europe and Macaronesia. Stud. Mycol.80, 187. 10.1016/j.simyco.2014.11.001

  • 14

    KubicekC. P.Komon-ZelazowskaM.DruzhininaI. S. (2008). Fungal genus Hypocrea/Trichoderma: from barcodes to biodiversity. J. Zhejiang Univ.9, 753763. 10.1631/jzus.B0860015

  • 15

    KumarS.StecherG.TamuraK. (2016). MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol.33, 18701874. 10.1093/molbev/msw054

  • 16

    MunkvoldG. P.WhiteD. G. (2016). Compendium of Corn Diseases, 4th Edn. St. Paul, MN: USA APS Press.

  • 17

    O'DonnellK.CigelnikE.NirenbergH. I. (1998). Molecular systematics and phytogeography of the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex. Mycologia90, 465493. 10.1080/00275514.1998.12026933

  • 18

    OSU. (2020). Iowa State University Trichoderma Ear Rot, Troubleshooting Abnormal Corn Ears. Available online at: https://u.osu.edu/mastercorn/Trichoderma-ear-rot/ (accessed February 18, 2020).

  • 19

    PopielD. I.KoczykG.DawidziukA.GromadzkaK.BlaszczykL.ChelkowskiJ. (2014). Zearalenone lactonohydrolase activity in Hypocreales and its evolutionary relationships within the epoxide hydrolase subset of a/b-hydrolases. BMC Microbiol.14:82. 10.1186/1471-2180-14-82

  • 20

    SamuelsG. J.HebbarP. K. (2015). Trichoderma: Identification and Agricultural Applications. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society.

  • 21

    SchusterA.SchmollM. (2010). Biology and biotechnology of Trichoderma. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.87, 787799. 10.1007/s00253-010-2632-1

  • 22

    TamuraK.StecherG.PetersonD.FilipskiA.KumarS. (2013). MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 30, 27252729. 10.1093/molbev/mst197

  • 23

    ThompsonJ. D.HigginsD. G.GibsonT. J. (1994). CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 46734680.

  • 24

    VincelliP. (2014). Trichoderma Ear Rot of Corn. Kentucky Pest News. Available online at: https://kentuckypestnews.wordpress.com/2014/12/23/Trichoderma-ear-rot-of-corn/ (accessed February 18, 2020).

  • 25

    WhiteT. J.BrunsT.LeeS.TaylorJ. (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetic, in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, eds M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Snisky, and T. J. White (San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc).

  • 26

    WiseK.AllenT.ChilversM.FaskeT.FreijeA.IsakeitT.et al. (2016). Ear Rots. Crop Protection Network. Available online at: https://crop-protection-network.s3.amazonaws.com/publications/cpn-2001-ear-rots.pdf (accessed March 10, 2020).

Summary

Keywords

Trichoderma harzianum, Trichoderma afroharzianum, pathogenicity, Trichoderma ear rot on maize, maize

Citation

Pfordt A, Schiwek S, Karlovsky P and von Tiedemann A (2020) Trichoderma Afroharzianum Ear Rot–A New Disease on Maize in Europe. Front. Agron. 2:547758. doi: 10.3389/fagro.2020.547758

Received

31 March 2020

Accepted

28 August 2020

Published

29 September 2020

Volume

2 - 2020

Edited by

Jonathan Spencer West, Rothamsted Research, United Kingdom

Reviewed by

Kevin King, Rothamsted Research, United Kingdom; Marzia Beccaccioli, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Annette Pfordt

This article was submitted to Disease Management, a section of the journal Frontiers in Agronomy

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics