CORRECTION article

Front. Anim. Sci., 05 January 2023

Sec. Animal Welfare and Policy

Volume 3 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2022.1102029

Corrigendum: A comparison of online and live training of livestock farmers for an on-farm self-assessment of animal welfare

  • 1. Farm Animal Behavior and Husbandry Section, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany

  • 2. Friedrich- Loeffler Institute of Animal Welfare and Animal Husbandry, Celle, Germany

  • 3. Thünen Institute of Organic Farming, Westerau, Germany

  • 4. Association for Technology and Structures in Agriculture, Darmstadt, Germany

Article metrics

View details

1,1k

Views

522

Downloads

In the published article, there was an error. In Table 3 the first row of the table was set as the header.

The corrected Table 3 and its caption appear below.

Table 3

Experience with species [years]MeanMin.Max.No answer [farmer]Wp-valuer
Online:
Live:
17.6
18.9
1
1
48
45
0
2
2533.50.7150.048
Agricultural educationUniversity or University of Applied Sciences degreeMaster´s certificateCompleted apprenticeshipUndergoing an apprenticeshipNo formal agricultural qualificationNo answerWp-valuer
Online:
Live:
25
19
22
27
11
11
2
3
6
4
7
5
2008.00.6120.024
Position at the farmHead of the farmHead of a farm sectionEmployeeApprenticeNo answerWp-valuer
Online:
Live:
42
35
9
11
15
11
1
2
6
10
1930.00.7960.070

Comparison of the farmers´ professional background between the online and live trained groups.

W denotes the standardized test statistic and r the effect size (Mann–Whitney U test).

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Statements

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Summary

Keywords

animal welfare, training, animal-based indicators, self-assessment, reliability, feasibility

Citation

Michaelis S, Schubbert A, Gieseke D, Cimer K, Zapf R, Lühken S, March S, Brinkmann J, Schultheiß U and Knierim U (2023) Corrigendum: A comparison of online and live training of livestock farmers for an on-farm self-assessment of animal welfare. Front. Anim. Sci. 3:1102029. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2022.1102029

Received

18 November 2022

Accepted

01 December 2022

Published

05 January 2023

Approved by

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Volume

3 - 2022

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Sarina Michaelis,

This article was submitted to Animal Welfare and Policy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Animal Science

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics