Nanoparticle-Based Therapies for Turning Cold Tumors Hot: How to Treat an Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment
Giulio Giustarini
Andrea Pavesi
Giulia Adriani- 1Singapore Immunology Network (SIgN), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore, Singapore
- 2Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore, Singapore
- 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Nanotechnologies are rapidly increasing their role in immuno-oncology in line with the need for novel therapeutic strategies to treat patients unresponsive to chemotherapies and immunotherapies. The tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) has emerged as critical for tumor classification and patient stratification to design better treatments. Notably, the tumor infiltration of effector T cells plays a crucial role in antitumor responses and has been identified as the primary parameter to define hot, immunosuppressed, excluded, and cold tumors. Organic and inorganic nanoparticles (NPs) have been applied as carriers of new targeted therapies to turn cold or altered (i.e., immunosuppressed or excluded) tumors into more therapeutically responsive hot tumors. This mini-review discusses the significant advances in NP-based approaches to turn immunologically cold tumors into hot ones.
Introduction
Over the last decades, scientists have made a tremendous effort to design new nanotechnologies to fight cancer. Nanotechnologies represent a promising therapeutic tool to reduce cancer’s social and economic burden, which remains a dreadful cause of death worldwide. Various nanotechnologies have demonstrated an improved therapeutic outcome over existing antitumor therapies and made possible targeted therapies by significantly reducing their systemic toxicity (Phuengkham et al., 2019).
Tumors are generally characterized by mutated cells with an uncontrolled proliferation that rapidly lump together with immune, endothelial and mesenchymal cells, and their extracellular matrix, creating a dedicated tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Recent advances in cancer immunology revealed that specific traits of the TIME correlate with the efficacy of chemotherapy and immunotherapies (Han et al., 2020; Liang et al., 2020). Based on their “immune contexture,” tumors have been categorized as hot, immunosuppressed, excluded, and cold (Galon et al., 2006; Galon and Bruni, 2019). Hot tumors are characterized by (i) a higher infiltration of T cells within the tumor and at the invasive margin, (ii) a higher level of proinflammatory cytokines, and (iii) a better response to immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies compared to excluded, immunosuppressed and cold tumors. For patient stratification, a standardized scoring system called Immunoscore has been introduced based on the quantification of CD3+ lymphocyte populations and ranging between 0 (hot immune tumors) and 4 (cold immune tumors) (Pagès et al., 2018).
Several features of hot tumors participate in the regulation of an antigen-specific response via the expression of inhibitory signals such as the activation of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) and other immune checkpoints, and the extracellular-potassium-mediated T cell suppression (Walunas et al., 1994; Ahmadzadeh et al., 2009; Eil et al., 2016). Peculiar driver and passenger mutations in cancer cells also contribute to the great heterogeneity in the TIME (Yoshida et al., 2016; McFarland et al., 2017). Further, physical barriers such as a dense extracellular matrix (ECM) (Heldin et al., 2004) and tumor-associated vasculature, cellular and humoral immunosuppressive components are all key players modulating the TIME (Joyce and Fearon, 2015). The presence of cytokines that regulate the function of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, such as interleukin 15 (IL-15), can influence CD8+ T cell presence and persistence within the TIME (Mlecnik et al., 2014).
In this review, we aim to summarize the most recent antitumor strategies that use nanotechnologies to favorably alter the immunosuppressive nature of the TIME, changing immune-defective tumors (cold) into immunogenic and immunoreactive environments (hot) as schematically depicted in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Schematic overview of the nanoparticle-based therapies to turn cold tumors hot. CAF, cancer-associated fibroblast; ECM, extracellular matrix; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; Treg, regulatory T cell; DC, dendritic cell; TLR, toll-like receptor; MDSC, myeloid-derived suppressor cell; ICD, immunogenic cell death; NK cell, natural killer cell; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; ICB, immune checkpoint blockade.
Nanotechnologies for Therapeutic Delivery
Nanotechnology-enabled drug delivery approaches have been designed and formulated for overcoming major bottlenecks of chemotherapies and immunotherapies. Organic and inorganic nanocarriers have improved tumor targeting and preserved chemical or biological payloads from degradation. Since nanoparticles (NPs) can be recognized and internalized by the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS), some NPs leverage their uptake by immune cells to reach and accumulate within the tumor site, also referred to as the Trojan horse method (Levy et al., 2016; Qi Y. et al., 2021). Other NPs take advantage of tumor features such as the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect and the lack of lymphatic drainage that promotes small NPs accumulation into the tumor rather than in healthy tissues. In addition to these anatomopathological features of cancer, NPs are often functionalized with specific molecules to promote infiltration and retention within the TIME and cellular targeting (Grobmyer and Moudgil, 2013; Nichols and Bae, 2014). Liposome (Aronson et al., 2021), micelles (Otsuka et al., 2003), gold nanoparticle (Gerosa et al., 2020), carbon nanotubes (Faraji Dizaji et al., 2020), silica/silicon NPs (Adriani et al., 2012; van de Ven et al., 2012), nanorods (Ali et al., 2017), dendrimers (Huang et al., 2020), polymer NPs (Avramovi et al., 2020) are some of the nanotechnologies most utilized for antitumor therapeutic strategies.
NP-Mediated Shaping of Physical Barriers and Target of Stromal Cells
Tumor immune microenvironment is usually characterized by physical barriers impeding immune cells and therapies to reach the tumor site. Since the penetration of immune cells into the tumor positively correlates with relapse-free survival and immunotherapies efficacy in preclinical and clinical studies, various strategies aiming to reduce physical barriers have been investigated. The predominant physical barrier within the TIME is the ECM (Winkler et al., 2020). Tumor ECM proteins are mainly secreted by abundantly recruited cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) (Casey et al., 2009; Afik et al., 2016), although tumor cells participate in ECM proteins deposition (Naba et al., 2012). Nanotechnology-based therapies able to change the density, organization, composition, and post-translational modification of the produced ECM proteins have been developed. Tumor ECM directly regulates effector functions of T cells (Parekh et al., 2005; Leclerc et al., 2019) and induces hypoxia. Hypoxia indirectly regulates the immune response and cell invasion into the tumor by increasing regulatory cytokines (IL-10, TGF-β) and decreasing cell adhesion molecules on tumor-associated blood vessels (Henke et al., 2020).
Two main strategies have been conceived to modulate the ECM promoting a better infiltration of immune cells and therapies within the TIME.
The first strategy aims to reduce the protein deposition or regulate their organization. This strategy was implemented in two in vivo studies targeting CAFs. The first study considered photosensitizer-loaded NPs combined with phototherapy for targeted CAF depletion. In contrast, the other study performed CAF reprogramming via gold NPs delivering siRNA against heat shock protein 47 (HSP47, a collagen-specific molecular chaperone) combined with all-trans retinoic acid to turn CAFs quiescent. Both studies showed a reduced ECM deposition allowing a better tumor penetration of CD8+ T cells and therapeutic NPs (Zhen et al., 2017; Han et al., 2018). Interestingly, Zhao et al. showed in a xenograft mouse model of colorectal cancer that gold NPs possess an intrinsic capacity to decrease ECM protein production (Zhao et al., 2018). Organization of the collagen fibers by post-translational modifications determines tumor stiffness. Administration of NPs coated with an inhibitory antibody against the collagen-cross linking enzyme lysyl oxidase was associated with a more significant suppressive effect of tumor growth than the inhibitory antibody alone (Kanapathipillai et al., 2012).
The second strategy to remodel tumor ECM relies on the metabolic activities of exogenous and endogenous proteases against ECM proteins such as collagen, hyaluronic acid, and fibronectin. Several NPs such as silver/gold particles, micelles, and liposomes (Abdolahinia et al., 2019; Zinger et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2021) have been tested as proteases carriers in different in vivo tumor models. Although these existing studies are unanimous in presenting a better penetration into the tumor when the NPs are coated with proteases (Zhou et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2020), none of them showed the effects of proteases on immune cell infiltration.
Granting that the approaches of remodeling tumor ECM to turn a cold tumor hot via NP-based therapies demonstrated therapeutic potential, they still present critical clinical limitations. For example, degradation of collagen could lead to cytokine release, which might sustain inflammatory processes promoting tumorigenesis. Additionally, loss of the containment function of the ECM might facilitate access to the bloodstream and consequent tumor metastasis, leading to a worse prognosis (Bonnans et al., 2014; Fang et al., 2014). For this reason, a deeper validation is required before the effective translation of these strategies to clinical settings.
NP-Mediated Targeting of Co-inhibitory and Co-stimulatory Ligands/Receptors
To reverse the unfavorable immune composition of cold tumors, NPs have been equipped with molecules capable of either stimulating the immunity against the tumor or inhibiting the regulatory mechanisms that prevent the immune system from fighting cancer cells. A fine-tuning of stimulatory and inhibitory signals from and to the innate immune system is critical to establish a favorable response against the tumor.
Although immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies are an undoubtful step forward in the fight against cancer, they might not reach the desired effectiveness in cold tumors due to the presence of cytokines inhibiting both maturation and activity of antigen-presenting cells, especially dendritic cells (DCs), and inducing polarization of TAMs (Rodell et al., 2018). Immunostimulants or inhibitors of regulatory mechanisms also found applications in cancer vaccine development to boost the presentation of the epitopes or their related mRNA (Ritchie and Li, 2020).
Toll-Like Receptors Agonists
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are Type I transmembrane glycoproteins expressed by cells of the innate immune system and malignant cells. Activation of TLRs leads to the production of proinflammatory cytokines such as type I interferons that mediate an adaptive immune response through activation of DCs. TLRs can be classified into two subgroups according to the type of ligands they respond to and their cellular localization: TLRs recognizing mainly bacterial components located on the plasma membrane such as TLR1/2/4/5/6 and TLRs recognizing DNA and RNA such as TLR3/7/8/9 which are instead located intracellularly on the endosome (Rakoff-Nahoum and Medzhitov, 2009).
Toll-like receptor stimulation may play a role in tumor development via either a protumor or antitumor effect on the mutated cells. In different settings, TLR stimulation was shown to cause either an antitumor effect by directly inducing gene-related programmed cell death or, conversely, to have a protumor effect promoting cell proliferation, mutagenesis, invasion, and even resistance to apoptosis in malignant cells mainly via activation of NF-kB, MAPK cascades and PI3K-Akt pathway (Cen et al., 2018; Kabelitz et al., 2019). Antitumor therapy with nanotechnologies delivering TLR agonists directly to antigen-presenting cells (APCs) prevents TLR degradation and potential side effects of the therapy (Berraondo et al., 2019; Ding et al., 2020; Flórez-Álvarez et al., 2020; Whang et al., 2020).
Toll-like receptor agonists for all the existing receptors except TLR1 and TLR6 have been tested in preclinical tumor models. The agonists were either added to NPs (liposomes, PLGA, pH-sensitive, CO2 releasing), peptide nanocomplexes, or forming immunoconjugates with other antibodies. NPs were designed to preserve the agonist, target specific cells within the TIME and release their immunostimulant cargo. These NP-based therapies mainly targeted TAMs and APCs, aiming to reduce the regulatory phenotype of TAMs and induce presentation and co-stimulatory molecules on APCs. Other studies have demonstrated that targeting cancer cells with NPs delivering agonists for TLR3 induces direct apoptosis of mutated cells (Schau et al., 2019).
Of interest, a preclinical combinatorial approach of NP-loaded TLR agonists with other already-approved immunotherapies such as immune checkpoints or EGFR blocking antibodies led to a more significant antitumor immune response and prolonged survival. These results were associated with an increased count of M1 macrophages in the tumor and a better safety profile of the treatments (Paone et al., 2008; Han et al., 2016; Rodell et al., 2018; Buss and Bhatia, 2020; Chuang et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2020; Smith et al., 2020). Notably, some therapeutic approaches even induced an abscopal effect on distant tumors (Buss and Bhatia, 2020).
Overall, TLR agonists in clinical settings have demonstrated antitumor effects when combined with immunotherapies, but, as monotherapy, their efficacy remains limited (Frega et al., 2020; Le Naour et al., 2020).
The Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily
The tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) superfamily is a class of receptors involved in several T cell activities. In particular, the engagement of these receptors determines the frequency of effector and memory T cells in response to antigen stimulation (Croft, 2009; Bremer et al., 2013). Indeed, these receptors can activate both innate and adaptive branches of the immune system, promoting the production of cytokines such as IL-4 and IFN-γ by lymphocytes and IL-1 and IL-12 by professional or non-professional APCs (Croft, 2009; Bremer et al., 2013).
It is known that TNFRs deliver co-stimulatory signals, as their effects largely depend on antigen recognition and TCR signaling (Croft, 2009). Thanks to their co-stimulatory signals, activating antibodies against TNFR family members 41BB, CD40, OX-40 have been tested in combination with antibody therapies against EGFR and immune checkpoints using NPs (especially PLGA NPs and carbon nanotubes) or nanocomplexes. The combination therapies resulted in more robust antitumor immune responses than each monotherapy, suggesting that polytherapy represents a better option for promoting a hot tumor (Dominguez and Lustgarten, 2010; Cruz et al., 2014). To further improve TNFR superfamily based therapies, NPs/nanoengagers have been functionalized with specific antibodies to promote activation of DCs and NK cells. The NPs carrying the stimulating cargo contributed to developing an immunogenic hot TIME eliciting a robust antitumor response (Dominguez and Lustgarten, 2010; Cruz et al., 2014; Au et al., 2020) in the presence of neglectable induction of regulatory T cells (Au et al., 2020).
cGAS-STING Pathway Activation
Cytosolic exogenous or endogenous DNA represents a danger signal for cells. The cyclic guanosine monophosphate (GMP)-adenosine monophosphate (AMP) synthase (cGAS) rapidly detects the cytosolic DNA to mount an innate response through the activation of the stimulator of interferon genes (STING). STING activation has been investigated as a co-stimulatory strategy to boost the immune response against cancer by mediating IFN type I responses in both innate and adaptive immune systems and by activating cell death in some cancer cells (Larkin et al., 2017; Liu and Guan, 2018; Bishop et al., 2020). Scientists hypothesized that targeted delivery of STING agonists such as cyclic dinucleotide (CDN) could potentially activate immune-suppressed tumors, turning them from cold to hot. For this purpose, agonists (Wilson et al., 2016; Cheng et al., 2018; Liang et al., 2020; Park et al., 2020), polymers directly inducing STING activation (Luo et al., 2017; Li et al., 2021) or chemotherapies inducing cytosolic DNA breaks (Eldehna et al., 2020) have been loaded on NPs (e.g., nanocages, liposomes, polymers, and hydrogels) designed to specifically target DCs and macrophages, demonstrating efficacy in preclinical tumor models. The use of liposome and silica NPs improved STING agonist responses, promoting a better infiltration of lymphocytes and reprogramming TAMs toward an M1 phenotype in murine tumor models (Cheng et al., 2018). Strikingly, a newly synthesized STING-activating polymer induced a prolonged activation (Li et al., 2021) and led to a robust antitumor immunity when combined with an antigen (Luo et al., 2017). The antigen-specific tumor response was even more remarkable when the STING-activating polymer was combined with conventional ligands (Li et al., 2021) or radiotherapy (Luo et al., 2019). Similarly, inhalable NPs loaded with a STING agonist combined with radiotherapy-induced systemic anticancer immunity with control over metastases (Liu et al., 2019). Effects of STING activation were also evaluated in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs or ICB, showing that STING-activating NPs modulate the TIME to promote responses of cold tumors insensitive to conventional monotherapies (Wilson et al., 2016; Liang et al., 2020). Of note, at the best of our knowledge, STING activating nanotechnological have not reached the readiness level for clinical trials.
Cytokines
Cytokines represent soluble mediators of cell communication and play a fundamental role in several pathophysiological conditions. The strategic modulation of cytokine secretion, circulation, and binding to their dedicated receptors is a successful approach to treating several diseases (Bird, 2016; Rider et al., 2016). In a melanoma mouse model, Hong et al. (2015) showed that PLGA particles loaded with IL-15/IL-15R complex were internalized by DCs and allowed trans-presentation of IL-15 to lymphocytes resulting in their activation and related enhancement of antitumor immune response.
Ramesh et al. (2019) focused instead on the functions of CSF1R in TAMs differentiation. An amphiphilic inhibitor of CSF1R was loaded into liposomes together with an inhibitor of the immune checkpoint CD47-SIRPα, adopted by cancer cells to escape from immune-mediated clearance. The administration of this dual therapy in a mouse model increased the percentage of M1-like macrophages and raised the infiltration of T cells and NK cells within the tumor, leading to a significant reduction in the tumor volume (Ramesh et al., 2019).
Cell membrane-adhering NPs loaded with cytokines have been used as a “cellular backpack” to sustain activation of cells after adoptive transfer in in vivo preclinical models. IFN-γ loaded backpacks binding to macrophages continuously guided the polarization of macrophages toward antitumor phenotypes (Wyatt Shields et al., 2020). Similarly, a backpack loaded with an IL-15 super-agonist increased T cell-mediated tumor clearance by mouse CD8+ T cells and human chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in a mouse model (Tang et al., 2018).
As demonstrated by these promising studies, targeting cytokine signaling with NPs represents a valuable strategy to turn a cold tumor hot.
NP-Mediated DNA and RNA Targeting
Gene silencing technologies, namely CRISPR-Cas9 and RNA interfering (RNAi), have gained attention as potential therapeutic tools in many diseases, including cancer (Mainini et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2021). To achieve cell-targeted delivery of nucleotide sequences in vivo, NPs, either organic or inorganic, are indispensable. In principle, DNA and mRNA targeting applies to any possible cellular target mentioned in the previous sections to modulate cold TIMEs. Small interfering RNA (siRNA) and short hairpin RNA (shRNA) are also applied in the modification of the TIME from cold to hot, as shown by the administration of siRNA/shRNA/miRNA encapsulated in various NPs that successfully reduced the expression of key proteins in cancer cells, endothelial cells, TAMs, DCs, monocytes and CAFs (Lee S. W. L. et al., 2019; Roscigno et al., 2020). For example, in different preclinical tumor models, CRISPR/Cas9 knockout or siRNA/shRNA/miRNA-mediated silencing of PD-L1 immune checkpoint, in combination with chemotherapy, hyaluronidase, or radiotherapy, promoted an increased T cells activation and tumor infiltration (Cortez et al., 2016; Guan et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2019; Xue et al., 2021). In two murine models of colon cancer, Liu et al. demonstrated the antitumor effects of IL-15, performing an in vivo transfection of cancer cells with an IL-15 plasmid contained in lipoplexes. By increasing the tumor expression of IL-15, the tumor acquired hot features with a raised infiltration of IFN+ T cells (Liu et al., 2018). Similar siRNA-mediated silencing approaches targeting lactic dehydrogenase of cancer cells (Zhang et al., 2019), VEGFR of endothelial cells (Cho et al., 2020), indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) of DCs (Endo et al., 2019) showed promising results in modulating tumors toward hot features. Interestingly, in preclinical tumor models, siRNA-regulated expression of STAT3, STAT6, IKKβ HIF-1α proteins for TAM differentiation (Shobaki et al., 2020; Xiao et al., 2020), and of CCR2 receptor for monocyte recruitment (Shen et al., 2018) enriched the TIME of antitumor M1-like macrophages and reduced the number of immunosuppressive cells. Inhibition of CXCL12 in CAFs using siRNA-loaded into a cell-penetrating peptide (CPP)-based NPs induced remodeling of TIME inhibiting cell invasion, migration, and tumor angiogenesis (Lang et al., 2019). Both RNA and DNA editing techniques have already reached clinical trials, and their applications for turning a cold tumor hot may reach the clinical phases in the next future.
NP-Delivered Small Molecules Inducing Cellular Stress, Immunogenic Cell Death, and Epigenetic Modifications
Cellular stress and immunogenic cell death (ICD) promote intra- and extracellular danger signals that mediate the activation of inflammatory pathways involved in the onset and maintenance of antitumor responses. Several molecules for cancer treatment can induce cellular stress (e.g., increased ROS and DNA damage) that can be sensed by immunocompetent cells, such as macrophages and DCs, sustaining inflammation and antigen presentation, thus, in turn, promoting a hot TIME. NP-targeted delivery of well-known chemotherapeutic drugs (e.g., intercalating agents and PARP1 inhibitors) or NP-assisted photothermal and radiotherapies provide in situ release of endogenous antigens and DAMPs, to boost antitumoral responses, especially if combined with ICB and to lower the systemic toxicity (Gao et al., 2020; Qi J. et al., 2021). DAMPs released by stressed cells promote activation of macrophages and their reprogramming toward an M1 proinflammatory phenotype. TAMs reprogramming toward an M1 phenotype is also promoted in vitro by NP-delivered compounds causing cellular stress such as low concentration of zoledronate loaded into liposomes (Sousa et al., 2015). Alternatively, TAM depletion is achieved by treatment with liposomes loaded with a high concentration of bisphosphonate that causes macrophage apoptosis (Zeisberger et al., 2006). TAMs depletion could be associated with an inflammatory response with increased T cell infiltration within the tumor, as shown in a mammary tumor animal model (Hollmén et al., 2019). Other TAMs depletion studies demonstrated their role in promoting tumor growth via sustained chronic inflammation, favoring angiogenesis, and establishing an immunosuppressive environment. On the other side, depleting TAMs rules out the possibility of leveraging the antitumor function of macrophages to have a synergistic effect with T cells (Poh and Ernst, 2018; Hollmén et al., 2019). Interesting, even macrophage phagocytosis of empty iron oxide or cationic polymer NPs (without a biologically active cargo) increased proinflammatory cytokines and immune cell infiltration, modulating the TIME toward hot characteristics (Lunov et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2013; Fuchs et al., 2016; Zanganeh et al., 2016).
Scientific evidence in favor of autophagy manipulation as cancer treatment is promising but sometimes contradictory. Studies showing iron oxide nanoparticle-mediated activation of tumoricidal autophagy in cancer cells and M1 polarization of macrophages (Xie et al., 2020) are in contrast to other studies demonstrating improved therapeutic effects of a combination of autophagy inhibitors (e.g., hydroxychloroquine) and antineoplastic therapies in clinical trials (Jiang et al., 2019) or inflammatory features in macrophages after autophagy inhibition (Jin et al., 2019).
Epigenetic modulators are another category of molecules that might benefit from the development of NP-based delivery strategies. For example, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) have been implemented within tumor-targeting particles showing significant inhibitory effects on tumor growth (Bertrand et al., 2019; Lee S. Y. et al., 2019). Studies evaluating the effects on the TIME of targeted HDACi therapy should be encouraged after the effects observed by selective HDACi in an NP-free treatment (McCaw et al., 2019).
Discussion
The recognition of the TIME predominant role in mediating the effectiveness of chemotherapies and immunotherapies has propelled the development of new strategies to overcome tumor resistance by turning immunologically cold tumors into hot ones. NPs have greatly helped this purpose as nanocarriers of chemical and biological factors, improving their targeted delivery, accumulation, and retention at the tumor site. However, it is a long way to demonstrate the clinical reliability of novel NP-based therapeutic approaches to regulate the immune processes within the TIME. With the support of recent nanotechnologies, the immunotherapy field might aim to identify new applications of pre-validated drugs and their combinations. For example, marketed drugs called statins primarily used against hypercholesterolemia were re-purposed to treat inflammatory and immune-mediated conditions when loaded on NPs that reduced their marked myotoxicity (Romana et al., 2014; Sonvico et al., 2017). Similarly, drugs previously excluded during the R&D stage due to unwanted toxicity might find suitable applications when administered by NPs (Goldman et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2021). In addition to therapies directly affecting stromal cells, future efforts could be spent on developing NP-based therapies capable of tuning tumor-cell intrinsic pathways such as mTOR, p53, or STAT3 in cancer cells for the indirect modulation of the tumor immune microenvironment. Indeed, recent studies underlined that tumor-intrinsic pathways are involved in the regulation of the TIME and may support a tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment (Yang et al., 2019). Importantly, personalized polytherapy approaches guided by a prompt TIME classification should be prioritized to provide improved clinical benefits to each specific cancer patient.
Author Contributions
GG and GA: conceptualization. GG: drafting. GA and AP: editing and revision. AP: figure. GG and GA: figure revision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by a core grant to Singapore Immunology Network (SIgN) from Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR) to GA and by a National Medical Research Council (NMRC) Open Fund Young Individual Research Grant (OFYIRG18nov-0002) to AP and GA.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
Abdolahinia, E. D., Nadri, S., Rahbarghazi, R., Barar, J., Aghanejad, A., and Omidi, Y. (2019). Enhanced penetration and cytotoxicity of metformin and collagenase conjugated gold nanoparticles in breast cancer spheroids. Life Sci. 231:116545. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116545
Adriani, G., Tullio, M. D., Ferrari, M., Hussain, F., Pascazio, G., Liu, X., et al. (2012). The preferential targeting of the diseased microvasculature by disk-like particles. Biomaterials 33, 5504–5513. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.027.The
Afik, R., Zigmond, E., Vugman, M., Klepfish, M., Shimshoni, E., Chor, M. P., et al. (2016). Tumor macrophages are pivotal constructors of tumor collagenous matrix. JEM 213, 2315–2331. doi: 10.1084/jem.20151193
Ahmadzadeh, M., Johnson, L. A., Heemskerk, B., Wunderlich, J. R., Dudley, M. E., White, D. E., et al. (2009). Tumor antigen-specific CD8 T cells infiltrating the tumor express high levels of PD-1 and are functionally impaired. Blood 114, 1537–1544. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-195792
Ali, M. R. K., Wu, Y., Tang, Y., Xiao, H., Chen, K., Han, T., et al. (2017). Targeting cancer cell integrins using gold nanorods in photothermal therapy inhibits migration through affecting cytoskeletal proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, E5655–E5663. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703151114
Aronson, M. R., Medina, S. H., and Mitchell, M. J. (2021). Peptide functionalized liposomes for receptor targeted cancer therapy. APL Bioeng. 5:011501. doi: 10.1063/5.0029860
Au, K. M., Park, S. I., and Wang, A. Z. (2020). Trispecific natural killer cell nanoengagers for targeted chemoimmunotherapy. Sci. Adv. 6, 1–16. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba8564
Avramovi, N., Mandi, B., Savi-Radojevi, A., and Simi, T. (2020). Polymeric nanocarriers of drug delivery systems in cancer therapy. Pharmaceutics 12, 1–17. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12040298
Berraondo, P., Sanmamed, M. F., Ochoa, M. C., Etxeberria, I., Aznar, M. A., and Pérez-gracia, J. L. (2019). Cytokines in clinical cancer immunotherapy. Br. J. Cancer 120, 6–15. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0328-y
Bertrand, P., Blanquart, C., and Héroguez, V. (2019). The ROMP: a powerful approach to synthesize novel ph-sensitive nanoparticles for tumor therapy. Biomolecules 9:60. doi: 10.3390/biom9020060
Bishop, L. W., Wehbe, M., Shae, D., James, J., Hacker, B. C., Garland, K., et al. (2020). Potent STING activation stimulates immunogenic cell death to enhance antitumor immunity in neuroblastoma. J. Immunother. Cancer 8, 1–17. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000282
Bonnans, C., Chou, J., and Werb, Z. (2014). Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat. Publ. Gr. 15, 786–801. doi: 10.1038/nrm3904
Bremer, E., Al-Ali, H., Bentel, J., Canuti, D., Mutti, L., and Sionov, R. V. (2013). Targeting of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily for cancer immunotherapy. ISRN Oncol. 2013:371854. doi: 10.1155/2013/371854
Buss, C. G., and Bhatia, S. N. (2020). Nanoparticle delivery of immunostimulatory oligonucleotides enhances response to checkpoint inhibitor therapeutics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 13428–13436. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001569117
Casey, T., Bond, J., Tighe, S., Hunter, T., Lintault, L., Patel, O., et al. (2009). Molecular signatures suggest a major role for stromal cells in development of invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 114, 47–62. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-9982-8
Cen, X., Liu, S., and Cheng, K. (2018). The role of toll-like receptor in inflammation and tumor immunity. Front. Pharmacol. 9:878. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00878
Chen, Q., Sun, T., and Jiang, C. (2021). Recent Advancements in Nanomedicine for ‘Cold’ Tumor Immunotherapy. Berlin: Springer.
Cheng, N., Watkins-Schulz, R., Junkins, R. D., David, C. N., Johnson, B. M., Montgomery, S. A., et al. (2018). A nanoparticle-incorporated STING activator enhances antitumor immunity in PD-L1-insensitive models of triple-negative breast cancer. JCI Insight 3:e120638. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.120638
Cho, R., Sakurai, Y., Sakura Jones, H., Akita, H., Hisaka, A., and Hatakeyama, H. (2020). Silencing of VEGFR2 by RGD-modified lipid nanoparticles enhanced the efficacy of Anti-PD-1 Antibody by accelerating vascular normalization and infiltration of T cells in tumors. Cancers (Basel) 12:3630. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123630
Chuang, H. C., Lin, H. Y., Liao, P. L., Huang, C. C., Lin, L. L., Hsu, W. M., et al. (2020). Immunomodulator polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid enhances the inhibitory effect of 13-cis-retinoic acid on neuroblastoma through a TLR3-related immunogenic-apoptotic response. Lab. Investig. 100, 606–618. doi: 10.1038/s41374-019-0356-0
Cortez, M. A., Ivan, C., Valdecanas, D., Wang, X., Peltier, H. J., Ye, Y., et al. (2016). PDL1 regulation by p53 via miR-34. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 108, 1–9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv303
Croft, M. (2009). The role of TNF superfamily members in T-cell function and diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 271–285. doi: 10.1038/nri2526.The
Cruz, L. J., Rosalia, R. A., Willem, J., Rueda, F., Löwik, C. W. G. M., and Ossendorp, F. (2014). Targeting nanoparticles to CD40, DEC-205 or CD11c molecules on dendritic cells for ef fi cient CD8 + T cell response: a comparative study. J. Control. Release 192, 209–218. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.07.040
Ding, C., Song, Z., Shen, A., and Chen, T. (2020). Small molecules targeting the innate immune cGAS − STING − TBK1 signaling pathway. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 10, 2272–2298. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.03.001
Dominguez, A. L., and Lustgarten, J. (2010). Targeting the tumor microenvironment with anti-neu/anti-CD40 conjugated nanoparticles for the induction of antitumor immune responses. Vaccine 28, 1383–1390. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.10.153
Eil, R., Vodnala, S. K., Clever, D., Klebanoff, C. A., Sukumar, M., Pan, J. H., et al. (2016). Ionic immune suppression within the tumour microenvironment limits T cell effector function. Nature 537, 539–543. doi: 10.1038/nature19364
Eldehna, W. M., Hanafy, N., Cui, Q., Singh, B., Sridhar, S., Yang, S., et al. (2020). Nanoparticle formulations of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors for cancer therapy. Front. Chem. 8:594619. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.594619
Endo, R., Nakamura, T., Kaw, K., Sato, Y., and Harashima, H. (2019). The silencing of indoleamine dendritic cells by siRNA-loaded lipid nanoparticles enhances cell-based cancer immunotherapy. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47799-w
Fang, M., Yuan, J., Peng, C., and Li, Y. (2014). Collagen as a double-edged sword in tumor progression. Tumor Biol. 35, 2871–2882. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1511-7
Faraji Dizaji, B., Khoshbakht, S., Farboudi, A., Azarbaijan, M. H., and Irani, M. (2020). Far-reaching advances in the role of carbon nanotubes in cancer therapy. Life Sci. 257:118059. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118059
Flórez-Álvarez, L., Ruiz-perez, L., Taborda, N., and Hernandez, J. C. (2020). Toll-like receptors as a therapeutic target in cancer, infections and inflammatory diseases. Immunotherapy 12, 311–322. doi: 10.2217/imt-2019-0096
Frega, G., Wu, Q., Le Naour, J., Vacchelli, E., Galluzzi, L., Kroemer, G., et al. (2020). Trial Watch: experimental TLR7/TLR8 agonists for oncological indications. Oncoimmunology 9:1796002. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1796002
Fuchs, A.-K., Syrovets, T., Haas, K. A., Loos, C., Musyanovych, A., Mail, V., et al. (2016). Carboxyl-and amino-functionalized polystyrene nanoparticles differentially affect the polarization profile of M1 and M2 macrophage subsets. Biomaterials 85, 78–87. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.064
Galon, J., and Bruni, D. (2019). Approaches to treat immune hot, altered and cold tumours with combination immunotherapies. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 18, 197–218. doi: 10.1038/s41573-018-0007-y
Galon, J., Costes, A., Sanchez-Cabo, F., Kirilovsky, A., Mlecnik, B., Lagorce-Pagès, C., et al. (2006). Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science 313, 1960–1964. doi: 10.1126/science.1129139
Gao, J., Wang, W.-Q., Pei, Q., Lord, M. S., and Yu, H.-J. (2020). Engineering nanomedicines through boosting immunogenic cell death for improved cancer immunotherapy. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 41, 986–994. doi: 10.1038/s41401-020-0400-z
Gerosa, C., Crisponi, G., Nurchi, V. M., Saba, L., Cappai, R., Cau, F., et al. (2020). Gold nanoparticles: a new golden Era in oncology? Pharmaceuticals 13, 1–18. doi: 10.3390/ph13080192
Goldman, A., Kulkarni, A., Kohandel, M., Pandey, P., Rao, P., Natarajan, S. K., et al. (2016). Rationally designed 2-in-1 nanoparticles can overcome adaptive resistance in cancer. ACS Nano 10, 5823–5834. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b00320
Grobmyer, S. R., and Moudgil, B. M. (2013). Cancer Nanotechnology: Methods and Protocols. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Guan, X., Lin, L., Chen, J., Hu, Y., Sun, P., Tian, H., et al. (2019). Efficient PD-L1 gene silence promoted by hyaluronidase for cancer immunotherapy. J. Control. Release 293, 104–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.11.022
Han, H. D., Byeon, Y., Kang, T. H., Jung, I. D., Lee, J. W., Shin, B. C., et al. (2016). Toll-like receptor 3-induced immune response by poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles for dendritic cell-based cancer immunotherapy. Int. J. Nanomed. 11, 5729–5742. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S109001
Han, S., Huang, K., Gu, Z., and Wu, J. (2020). Tumor immune microenvironment modulation-based drug delivery strategies for cancer immunotherapy. Nanoscale 12, 413–436. doi: 10.1039/c9nr08086d
Han, X., Li, Y., Xu, Y., Zhao, X., Zhang, Y., Yang, X., et al. (2018). Reversal of pancreatic desmoplasia by re-educating stellate cells with a tumour microenvironment-activated nanosystem. Nat. Commun. 9:3390. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05906-x
Heldin, C. H., Rubin, K., Pietras, K., and Östman, A. (2004). High interstitial fluid pressure - An obstacle in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 806–813. doi: 10.1038/nrc1456
Henke, E., Nandigama, R., and Ergün, S. (2020). Extracellular matrix in the tumor microenvironment and its impact on cancer therapy. Front. Mol. Biosci. 6:160. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2019.00160
Hollmén, M., Allavena, P., University, M., Debets, R., Donnadieu, E., Bercovici, N., et al. (2019). The remarkable plasticity of macrophages: a chance to fight cancer. Front. Immunol. 1:1563. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01563
Hong, E., Usiskin, I. M., Bergamaschi, C., Hanlon, D. J., Edelson, R. L., Justesen, S., et al. (2015). Configuration-dependent presentation of multivalent IL-15: il-15R enhances the antigen-specific T cell response and anti-tumor immunity. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 8931–8950. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.695304
Huang, H., Chen, L., Sun, W., Du, H., Dong, S., and Qasem, A. M. (2021). Theranostics Collagenase IV and clusterin-modified polycaprolactone-polyethylene glycol nanoparticles for penetrating dense tumor tissues. Theranostics 11, 906–924. doi: 10.7150/thno.47446
Huang, K.-W., Hsu, F.-F., Qiu, J. T., Chern, G.-J., Lee, Y.-A., Chang, C.-C., et al. (2020). Highly efficient and tumor-selective nanoparticles for dual-targeted immunogene therapy against cancer. Sci. Adv. 6:eaax5032. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax5032
Huang, Z., Yang, Y., Jiang, Y., Shao, J., Sun, X., Chen, J., et al. (2013). Biomaterials Anti-tumor immune responses of tumor-associated macrophages via toll-like receptor 4 triggered by cationic polymers. Biomaterials 34, 746–755. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.062
Jiang, G. M., Tan, Y., Wang, H., Peng, L., Chen, H. T., Meng, X. J., et al. (2019). The relationship between autophagy and the immune system and its applications for tumor immunotherapy. Mol. Cancer 18, 1–22. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-0944-z
Jin, R., Liu, L., Zhu, W., Li, D., Yang, L., Duan, J., et al. (2019). Iron oxide nanoparticles promote macrophage autophagy and inflammatory response through activation of toll-like Receptor-4 signaling. Biomaterials 203, 23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.02.026
Joyce, J. A., and Fearon, D. T. (2015). T cell exclusion, immune privilege, and the tumor microenvironment. Science 348, 74–80. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa6204
Kabelitz, D., Lathia, J., Nita-Lazar, A., Hupp, T. R., Goodlett, D. R., Khan, M. M., et al. (2019). The role of TLRs in anti-cancer immunity and tumor rejection. Front. Immunol. 10:2388. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02388
Kanapathipillai, M., Mammoto, A., Mammoto, T., Kang, J. H., Jiang, E., Ghosh, K., et al. (2012). Inhibition of mammary tumor growth using lysyl oxidase-targeting nanoparticles to modify extracellular matrix. Nano Lett. 12, 3213–3217. doi: 10.1021/nl301206p
Kim, H., Khanna, V., Kucaba, T. A., Zhang, W., Sehgal, D., Ferguson, D. M., et al. (2020). TLR7/8 agonist-loaded nanoparticles augment NK cell-mediated antibody-based cancer immunotherapy. Mol. Pharm. 17, 2109–2124. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00271
Lang, J., Zhao, X., Qi, Y., Zhang, Y., Han, X., Ding, Y., et al. (2019). Reshaping Prostate Tumor Microenvironment to Suppress Metastasis via Cancer-Associated Fibroblast Inactivation with Peptide-Assembly-Based Nanosystem. ACS Nano 13, 12357–12371. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b04857
Larkin, B., Ilyukha, V., Sorokin, M., Buzdin, A., Vannier, E., Poltorak, A., et al. (2017). Activation of STING in T cells induces type I IFN responses and cell death. J. Immunol. 199, 397–402. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601999.Activation
Le Naour, J., Galluzzi, L., Zitvogel, L., Kroemer, G., and Vacchelli, E. (2020). Trial watch: TLR3 agonists in cancer therapy. Oncoimmunology 9:1771143. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1771143
Leclerc, M., Voilin, E., Gros, G., Corgnac, S., de Montpréville, V., Validire, P., et al. (2019). Regulation of antitumour CD8 T-cell immunity and checkpoint blockade immunotherapy by Neuropilin-1. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11280-z
Lee, S. W. L., Paoletti, C., Campisi, M., Osaki, T., Adriani, G., Kamm, R. D., et al. (2019). MicroRNA delivery through nanoparticles. J. Control. Release 313, 80–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.007
Lee, S. Y., Hong, E. H., Jeong, J. Y., Cho, J., Seo, J. H., Ko, H. J., et al. (2019). Esterase-sensitive cleavable histone deacetylase inhibitor-coupled hyaluronic acid nanoparticles for boosting anticancer activities against lung adenocarcinoma. Biomater. Sci. 7, 4624–4635. doi: 10.1039/c9bm00895k
Levy, O., Brennen, W. N., Han, E., Rosen, D. M., Musabeyezu, J., Safaee, H., et al. (2016). A prodrug-doped cellular Trojan Horse for the potential treatment of prostate cancer. Biomaterials 91, 140–150. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.03.023
Li, S., Luo, M., Wang, Z., Feng, Q., Wilhelm, J., Wang, X., et al. (2021). Prolonged activation of innate immune pathways by a polyvalent STING agonist. Nat. Biomed. Eng. [Online ahead of print] doi: 10.1038/s41551-020-00675-9
Liang, J., Wang, H., Ding, W., Huang, J., Zhou, X., Wang, H., et al. (2020). Nanoparticle-enhanced chemo-immunotherapy to trigger robust antitumor immunity. Sci. Adv. 6:eabc3646. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc3646
Liu, S., and Guan, W. (2018). STING signaling promotes apoptosis, necrosis, and cell death: an overview and update. Mediators Inflamm. 2018:1202797. doi: 10.1155/2018/1202797
Liu, X., Li, Y., Sun, X., Muftuoglu, Y., Wang, B., Yu, T., et al. (2018). Powerful anti-colon cancer effect of modified nanoparticle-mediated IL-15 immunogene therapy through activation of the host immune system. Theranostics 8, 3490–3503. doi: 10.7150/thno.24157
Liu, Y., Crowe, W. N., Wang, L., Lu, Y., Petty, W. J., Habib, A. A., et al. (2019). An inhalable nanoparticulate STING agonist synergizes with radiotherapy to confer long-term control of lung metastases. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13094-5
Lunov, O., Syrovets, T., Loos, C., Nienhaus, G. U., Mailä, V., Landfester, K., et al. (2011). Amino-functionalized polystyrene nanoparticles activate the NLRP3 inflammasome in human macrophages. ACS Nano 5, 9648–9657. doi: 10.1021/nn203596e
Luo, M., Liu, Z., Zhang, X., Han, C., Samandi, L. Z., Dong, C., et al. (2019). Synergistic STING activation by PC7A nanovaccine and ionizing radiation improves cancer immunotherapy. J. Control. Release 300, 154–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.02.036
Luo, M., Wang, H., Wang, Z., Cai, H., Lu, Z., Li, Y., et al. (2017). A STING-activating nanovaccine for cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 648–654. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2017.52
Mainini, F., Eccles, M. R., and Esposito, C. L. (2020). Lipid and polymer-based nanoparticle siRNA delivery systems for cancer therapy. Molecules 25:2692. doi: 10.3390/molecules25112692
McCaw, T. R., Li, M., Starenki, D., Liu, M., Cooper, S. J., Arend, R. C., et al. (2019). Histone deacetylase inhibition promotes intratumoral CD8+ T-cell responses, sensitizing murine breast tumors to anti-PD1. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 68, 2081–2094. doi: 10.1007/s00262-019-02430-9
McFarland, C. D., Yaglom, J. A., Wojtkowiak, J. W., Scott, J. G., Morse, D. L., Sherman, M. Y., et al. (2017). The damaging effect of passenger mutations on cancer progression. Cancer Res. 77, 4763–4772. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-3283-T
Mlecnik, B., Bindea, G., Angell, H. K., Sasso, M. S., Obenauf, A. C., Fredriksen, T., et al. (2014). Functional network pipeline reveals genetic determinants associated with in situ lymphocyte proliferation and survival of cancer patients. Sci. Transl. Med. 6:228ra37. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007240
Naba, A., Clauser, K. R., Hoersch, S., Liu, H., Carr, S. A., and Hynes, R. O. (2012). The matrisome: in silico definition and in vivo characterization by proteomics of normal and tumor extracellular matrices. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, 1–18. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.014647
Nichols, J. W., and Bae, Y. H. (2014). EPR: evidence and fallacy. J. Control. Release 190, 451–464. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.057
Otsuka, H., Nagasaki, Y., and Kataoka, K. (2003). PEGylated nanoparticles for biological and pharmaceutical applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 55, 403–419. doi: 10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00226-0
Pagès, F., Mlecnik, B., Marliot, F., Bindea, G., Ou, F. S., Bifulco, C., et al. (2018). International validation of the consensus Immunoscore for the classification of colon cancer: a prognostic and accuracy study. Lancet 391, 2128–2139. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30789-X
Paone, A., Starace, D., Galli, R., Padula, F., De Cesaris, P., Filippini, A., et al. (2008). Toll-like receptor 3 triggers apoptosis of human prostate cancer cells through a PKC-α-dependent mechanism. Carcinogenesis 29, 1334–1342. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn149
Parekh, K., Ramachandran, S., Cooper, J., Bigner, D., Patterson, A., and Mohanakumar, T. (2005). Tenascin-C, over expressed in lung cancer down regulates effector functions of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Lung Cancer 47, 17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.05.016
Park, K. S., Xu, C., Sun, X., Louttit, C., and Moon, J. J. (2020). Improving STING agonist delivery for cancer immunotherapy using biodegradable mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Adv. Ther. 3:2000130. doi: 10.1002/adtp.202000130
Phuengkham, H., Ren, L., Shin, I. W., and Lim, Y. T. (2019). Nanoengineered immune niches for reprogramming the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and enhancing cancer immunotherapy. Adv. Mater. 31, 1–21. doi: 10.1002/adma.201803322
Poh, A. R., and Ernst, M. (2018). Targeting macrophages in cancer: from bench to bedside. Front. Oncol. 8:49. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00049
Qi, J., Jin, F., Xu, X., and Du, Y. (2021). Combination cancer immunotherapy of nanoparticle-based immunogenic cell death inducers and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Int. J. Nanomedicine 16, 1435–1456. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S285999
Qi, Y., Yan, X., Xia, T., and Liu, S. (2021). Use of macrophage as a Trojan horse for cancer nanotheranostics. Mater. Des. 198:109388. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109388
Rakoff-Nahoum, S., and Medzhitov, R. (2009). Toll-like receptors and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 9, 57–63. doi: 10.1038/nrc2541
Ramesh, A., Kumar, S., Nandi, D., and Kulkarni, A. (2019). CSF1R- and SHP2-Inhibitor-loaded nanoparticles enhance cytotoxic activity and phagocytosis in tumor-associated macrophages. Adv. Mater. 31, 1–11. doi: 10.1002/adma.201904364
Rider, P., Carmi, Y., and Cohen, I. (2016). Biologics for targeting inflammatory cytokines, clinical uses, and limitations. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2016:9259646. doi: 10.1155/2016/9259646
Ritchie, C., and Li, L. (2020). cGAMP as an adjuvant in antiviral vaccines and cancer immunotherapy. Biochemistry 59, 1713–1715. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00226
Rodell, C. B., Arlauckas, S. P., Cuccarese, M. F., Christopher, S., Li, R., Ahmed, M. S., et al. (2018). TLR7/8-agonist-loaded nanoparticles promote the polarization of tumour-associated macrophages to enhance cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 578–588. doi: 10.1038/s41551-018-0236-8
Romana, B., Batger, M., Prestidge, C., Colombo, G., and Sonvico, F. (2014). Expanding the therapeutic potential of statins by means of nanotechnology enabled drug delivery systems. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 14, 1182–1193. doi: 10.2174/1568026614666140329232252
Roscigno, G., Scognamiglio, I., Ingenito, F., Chianese, R. V., Palma, F., Palma, C., et al. (2020). Modulating the crosstalk between the tumor and the microenvironment using sirna: a flexible strategy for breast cancer treatment. Cancers (Basel). 12, 1–20. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123744
Schau, I., Michen, S., Hagstotz, A., Janke, A., Schackert, G., Appelhans, D., et al. (2019). Targeted delivery of TLR3 agonist to tumor cells with single chain antibody fragment-conjugated nanoparticles induces type I-interferon response and apoptosis. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40032-8
Shen, S., Zhang, Y., Chen, K. G., Luo, Y. L., and Wang, J. (2018). Cationic polymeric nanoparticle delivering CCR2 siRNA to inflammatory monocytes for tumor microenvironment modification and cancer therapy. Mol. Pharm. 15, 3642–3653. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00997
Shobaki, N., Sato, Y., Suzuki, Y., Okabe, N., and Harashima, H. (2020). Manipulating the function of tumor-associated macrophages by siRNA-loaded lipid nanoparticles for cancer immunotherapy. J. Control. Release 325, 235–248. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.07.001
Smith, A. A. A., Gale, E. C., Roth, G. A., Maikawa, C. L., Correa, S., Yu, A. C., et al. (2020). Nanoparticles presenting potent TLR7/8 agonists enhance Anti-PD- L1 immunotherapy in cancer treatment. Biomacromolecules 21, 3704–3712. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00812
Sonvico, F., Zimetti, F., Pohlmann, A. R., and Guterres, S. S. (2017). Drug delivery to the brain: how can nanoencapsulated statins be used in the clinic? Ther. Deliv. 8, 625–631. doi: 10.4155/tde-2017-0044
Sousa, S., Auriola, S., Mönkkönen, J., and Määttä, J. (2015). Liposome encapsulated zoledronate favours M1-like behaviour in murine macrophages cultured with soluble factors from breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer 15:4. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1005-7
Tang, L., Zheng, Y., Melo, M. B., Mabardi, L., Castaño, A. P., Xie, Y.-Q., et al. (2018). Enhancing T cell therapy through TCR-signaling- responsive nanoparticle drug delivery. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 707–716. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4181
van de Ven, A. L., Kim, P., Haley, O., Fakhoury, J. R., Adriani, G., Schmulen, J., et al. (2012). Rapid tumoritropic accumulation of systemically injected plateloid particles and their biodistribution. J. Control Release 158, 148–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.10.021.Rapid
Walunas, T. L., Lenschow, D. J., Bakker, C. Y., Linsley, P. S., Freeman, G. J., Green, J. M., et al. (1994). CTLA-4 Can function as a potent negative regulator of T cell activation. Immunity 1, 405–413. doi: 10.1016/1074-7613(94)90071-x
Whang, Y. M., Yoon, D. H., Hwang, G. Y., Yoon, H., Park, S. I., Choi, Y. W., et al. (2020). Liposome-encapsulated bacillus calmette–guérin cell wall skeleton enhances antitumor efficiency for bladder cancer in vitro and in vivo via induction of amp-activated protein kinase. Cancers (Basel). 12:3679. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123679
Wilson, D. R., Sen, R., Sunshine, J. C., Pardoll, D. M., Green, J. J., and Kim, Y. J. (2016). Biodegradable STING agonist nanoparticles for enhanced cancer immunotherapy. Physiol. Behav. 176, 100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2017.10.013.Biodegradable
Winkler, J., Abisoye-Ogunniyan, A., Metcalf, K. J., and Werb, Z. (2020). Concepts of extracellular matrix remodelling in tumour progression and metastasis. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–19. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18794-x
Wu, Y., Gu, W., Li, J., Chen, C., and Xu, Z. P. (2019). Silencing PD-1 and PD-L1 with nanoparticle-delivered small interfering RNA increases cytotoxicity of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 14, 955–967. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2018-0237
Wyatt Shields, C., Evans, M. A., Wang, L. L. W., Baugh, N., Iyer, S., Wu, D., et al. (2020). Cellular backpacks for macrophage immunotherapy. Sci. Adv. 6, 1–12. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz6579
Xiao, H., Guo, Y., Li, B., Li, X., Wang, Y., Han, S., et al. (2020). M2-Like tumor-associated macrophage-targeted codelivery of STAT6 inhibitor and IKKβ siRNA induces M2-to-M1 repolarization for cancer immunotherapy with low immune side effects. ACS Cent. Sci. 6, 1208–1222. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.9b01235
Xie, Y., Jiang, J., Tang, Q., Zou, H., Zhao, X., Liu, H., et al. (2020). Iron oxide nanoparticles as autophagy intervention agents suppress hepatoma growth by enhancing tumoricidal autophagy. Adv. Sci. 7:1903323. doi: 10.1002/advs.201903323
Xu, F., Huang, X., Wang, Y., and Zhou, S. (2020). A Size-changeable collagenase-modified nanoscavenger for increasing penetration and retention of nanomedicine in deep tumor tissue. Adv. Mater. 32, 1–12. doi: 10.1002/adma.201906745
Xue, X., Li, J., Fan, Y., Shen, M., and Shi, X. (2021). Gene silencing-mediated immune checkpoint blockade for tumor therapy boosted by dendrimer- entrapped gold nanoparticles. Sci. China Mater. 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s40843-020-1591-1
Yang, L., Li, A., Lei, Q., and Zhang, Y. (2019). Tumor-intrinsic signaling pathways: key roles in the regulation of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. J. Hematol. Oncol. 12, 1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0804-8
Yoshida, M., Taguchi, A., Kawana, K., Adachi, K., Kawata, A., Ogishima, J., et al. (2016). Modification of the tumor microenvironment in KRAS or c-MYC-induced ovarian cancer-associated peritonitis. PLoS One 11:e160330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160330
Zanganeh, S., Hutter, G., Spitler, R., Lenkov, O., Mahmoudi, M., Shaw, A., et al. (2016). Iron oxide nanoparticles inhibit tumour growth by inducing pro- inflammatory macrophage polarization polarization in tumour tissues. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 986–994. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2016.168.Iron
Zeisberger, S. M., Odermatt, B., Marty, C., Zehnder-Fjällman, A. H. M., Ballmer-Hofer, K., and Schwendener, R. A. (2006). Clodronate-liposome-mediated depletion of tumour-associated macrophages: a new and highly effective antiangiogenic therapy approach. Br. J. Cancer 95, 272–281. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603240
Zhang, Y. X., Zhao, Y. Y., Shen, J., Sun, X., Liu, Y., Liu, H., et al. (2019). Nanoenabled modulation of acidic tumor microenvironment reverses anergy of infiltrating T cells and potentiates Anti-PD-1 therapy. Nano Lett. 19, 2774–2783. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04296
Zhao, X., Pan, J., Li, W., Yang, W., Qin, L., and Pan, Y. (2018). Gold nanoparticles enhance cisplatin delivery and potentiate chemotherapy by decompressing colorectal cancer vessels. Int. J. Nanomedicine 13, 6207–6221. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S176928
Zhen, Z., Tang, W., Wang, M., Zhou, S., Wang, H., Wu, Z., et al. (2017). Protein nanocage mediated fibroblast-activation protein targeted photoimmunotherapy to enhance cytotoxic T cell infiltration and tumor control. Nano Lett. 17, 862–869. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04150
Zhou, H., Fan, Z., Deng, J., Lemons, P. K., Arhontoulis, D. C., Bowne, W. B., et al. (2016). Hyaluronidase embedded in nanocarrier PEG shell for enhanced tumor penetration and higly efficient antitumor efficacy. Nano Lett. 16, 3268–3277. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00820
Keywords: nanotechnologies, cold tumors, hot tumors, nanoparticles, cancer therapies, tumor immune microenvironment, drug delivery, immunotherapies
Citation: Giustarini G, Pavesi A and Adriani G (2021) Nanoparticle-Based Therapies for Turning Cold Tumors Hot: How to Treat an Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9:689245. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.689245
Received: 31 March 2021; Accepted: 10 May 2021;
Published: 02 June 2021.
Edited by:
Paolo Bianchini, Italian Institute of Technology (IIT), ItalyReviewed by:
Jinyang Li, The Rockefeller University, United StatesAttilio Marino, Italian Institute of Technology (IIT), Italy
Copyright © 2021 Giustarini, Pavesi and Adriani. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Giulia Adriani, giulia_adriani@immunol.a-star.edu.sg