Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 06 September 2021
Sec. Biomaterials
Volume 9 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.739613

Editorial: Electrospinning of Bioinspired Materials and Structures for Bioengineering and Advanced Biomedical Applications

  • 1Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum-Università, Bologna, Italy
  • 2Health Sciences and Technologies – Interdepartmental Center for Industrial Research (CIRI-HST), Alma Mater Studiorum-Università, Bologna, Italy
  • 3Department of Chemistry “G. Ciamician”, Alma Mater Studiorum-Università, Bologna, Italy
  • 4Department of Mechanical Engineering, Center for Nanofibers and Nanotechnology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
  • 5Applications in Mechanical Engineering and Materials Technology – Interdepartmental Center for Industrial Research (CIRI-MAM), Alma Mater Studiorum-Università, Bologna, Italy

The Research Topic “Electrospinning of Bioinspired Materials and Structures for Bioengineering and Advanced Biomedical Applications” includes submissions that relate to the “Biomaterials” and “Bionics and Biomimetics” sections of Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. The collection aims to provide an overview of how electrospinning, inspired by nature, can reproduce the hierarchical structure and biomechanical properties of biological tissues, ranging from the nanoscale to the macroscale. The development of such innovative nanofibrous structures requires the improvement of both functionalization and biofabrication strategies, to enhance the scaffold bioactivity and to drive cells in the regeneration of the extracellular matrix (ECM) of the target tissues of interest. Recent technological advances have given rise to the availability of intelligent and smart biomaterials for the regeneration of innovative procedures for manufacturing nanometric structures, and methods for assembling multiscale hierarchical structures. Furthermore, imaging has improved considerably in the last few years, allowing multimodal imaging with nanometric resolution.

The study by Daraeinejad and Shabani targeted the regeneration of electroactive tissues. They investigated the most suitable solvent system for electrospun conductive polyaniline (PANI). To enhance the spinnability of PANI, they electrospun the polymer in a blend with poly (ether sulfone) (PES), using HFIP as a solvent. These nanofibers have been shown to enhance fibroblast proliferation and elongation after 7 days of culture.

Delaine-smith et al. investigated how the orientation of gelatin-coated poly (caprolactone) nanofibers (from random to aligned) can influence mature murine osteoblasts or human osteogenic mesenchymal progenitors in the production of mineralized collagenous matrix and its mechanical properties. Murine osteoblasts deposited more calcium-containing matrix on aligned scaffolds, while human osteogenic mesenchymal progenitors exhibited more collagen and calcium deposition on randomly orientated ones. These results suggested that a suitable scaffold for mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis, to enhance differentiation and control the organization of the ECM, needs to combine random and oriented nanofibers.

The functionalization of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) [P (3HB-co-4HB)] copolymer nanofibrous scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering was explored by Vigneswari et al. The P (3HB-co-4HB) copolymer was electrospun by obtaining random nanofibrous mats functionalized with RGD peptides. The scaffolds promoted the attachment and proliferation of H9c2 cells.

Giuntoli et al. aimed to improve the tissue integration of meshes for abdominal hernia surgery. They explored an electrospun nanofibrous coating to speed up cell attachment and tissue formation. A commercial PP hernia mesh was coated with a nanofibrous membrane from a polycaprolactone and gelatin blend. Human fibroblasts adhered to the electrospun substrate without necrosis induction, suggesting its suitability for abdominal wall hernia repair.

Hiraki et al. optimized electrospun nanofibers loaded with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), to magnetically promote the orientation of mouse tenocytes and human epithelial cells. SPION density and magnetic field, guided and tuned fiber alignment. The functionalization of microfiber segments with cell adhesive peptides induced a uniaxial alignment of tendon fibroblasts. The authors also demonstrated that these fibrillar hydrogel composites were able to drive multicellular migration from human epithelial cell spheroids, promoting the separation of single cells.

Sensini et al. aimed to mimic the mechanical behavior of natural tendon fascicles at physiological strain levels. They produced prosthetic fascicle-inspired electrospun nylon 6,6 bundles with different collector peripheral speeds, reaching different orientations of nanofibers (from randomly to mostly axially aligned arranged). For each sample category, the transition (end of toe region) and the inflection (switch from strain-stiffening to strain-softening) points of the stress-strain curves were calculated. This study showed that these points can shift with nanofiber arrangement and compare their values with those of tendons.

A review on these topics is included (Sensini et al.), covering the state of the art of electrospinning strategies adopted to mimic the tendon/ligament-to-bone insertions (enthesis) and the myotendinous junction. The most relevant papers in the field were described following the increasing hierarchical complexity of scaffolds. The biofabrication strategies adopted, the in vitro and in vivo outcomes, the ECM production, and the biomechanical performances were described, highlighting the strengths and open questions of interfacial tissue engineering.

This collection of articles demonstrates how electrospinning is able, by tailoring the organization of its nanofibers and their functionalization, to reproduce the structure and mechanics of the ECM of human tissues at different levels of hierarchical complexity, offering biomimetic environments in which the tissue of interest is proliferated and regenerated. However, the analysis undertaken by the papers in this Research Topic does also reveal unsolved challenges, such as the possibility to effectively ensure the multi-tissue regeneration of electrospun scaffolds by guiding stem cell fate and successfully reproduce a faithful multiscale hierarchical structure of the target tissue of interest.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

LC, MF, SR, AS, and AZ hold patents related to electrospinning and bioinspired materials.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: electrospinning, bioinspired structures, biomaterials, bioengineering, advanced biomedical applications

Citation: Cristofolini L, Focarete ML, Ramakrishna S, Sensini A and Zucchelli A (2021) Editorial: Electrospinning of Bioinspired Materials and Structures for Bioengineering and Advanced Biomedical Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9:739613. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.739613

Received: 11 July 2021; Accepted: 14 July 2021;
Published: 06 September 2021.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Hasan Uludag, University of Alberta, Canada

Copyright © 2021 Cristofolini, Focarete, Ramakrishna, Sensini and Zucchelli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Luca Cristofolini, luca.cristofolini@unibo.it; Maria Letizia Focarete, marialetizia.focarete@unibo.it; Seeram Ramakrishna, seeram@nus.edu.sg; Andrea Zucchelli, a.zucchelli@unibo.it

Download