Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle-Based Imaging Agents for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection
Xuqi Peng 
Zhao Lei
Gang Liu- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by poor prognosis and high mortality. The treatment of HCC is closely related to the stage, and the early-stage of HCC patients usually accompanies a more long-term survival rate after clinical treatment. Hence, there are critical needs to develop effective imaging agents with superior diagnostic precision for HCC detection at an early stage. Recently, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) based imaging agents have gained extensive attentions in HCC detection, which can serve as a multifunctional nanoplatform with controllable size and facile surface functionalization. This perspective summarizes recent advances in MSNs based imaging agents for HCC detection by the incorporation of several clinical imaging modalities. Multi-modal imaging system has been developed for higher spatial resolution and sensitivity. Even though some limitations and challenges need to be overcome, we envision the development of novel MSNs based imaging agents will offer great potential applications in clinical HCC detection.
Introduction
Liver cancer incidence continued to increase, and the 5-years relative survival rate of liver cancer is only 20% (Siegel et al., 2021). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth most common cause of cancer death worldwide, which is characterized by poor prognosis and high mortality (Villanueva, 2019). The diagnosis of HCC in clinic mainly including clinical features, diagnostic imaging and liver biopsy (El-Serag et al., 2008). However, most HCC patients are diagnosed at late and advanced stages, leading to undesirable treatment outcomes (Befeler and Di Bisceglie, 2002; Shi et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2017). Precise diagnosis of HCC at an early stage is beneficial for choosing better treatment options. Certain new imaging techniques have been applied for precise HCC detection and improving the prognosis of patients, including ultrasound (Lin X. et al., 2019), computed tomography (CT) (Chen et al., 2014; Cheng et al., 2014), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Cai et al., 2020; Wang C. et al., 2019), fluorescence imaging (Lin H. et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2019), photoacoustic imaging (PAI) (Lei et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2021) and positron emission tomography imaging (Hu et al., 2012). Each imaging technique showed unique advantages and limitations for liver cancer screening, detection or intraoperative navigation. (Ariff et al., 2009). US imaging has been recommended as a screening imaging modality to screen liver cancer because of its simplicity, flexibility, non-invasive, low cost and real-time properties. However, the sensitivity of ultrasonic diagnosis for small liver cancer (<2 cm) was only 39–65%. The measurements of serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) is usually necessary to couple with Liver US for high-risk patients for early HCC screening. Once screening abnormal liver, dynamic enhanced CT and muti-modal MRI can be used for further diagnosis and staging due to their relatively higher sensitivity and specificity. Although MRI is particularly well-suited for liver cancer detection, it has not yet been used for intraoperative surgical guidance owing to its high cost and long imaging times. Fluorescence image has long been used for guiding surgery in liver cancer theranostics (Chen H. et al., 2020). For example, intraoperative NIR-II imaging with suitable fluorescence probes showed a high tumor-to-normal-liver-tissue signal ratio (5.33) during the fluorescence-guided surgical resection of liver tumors (Hu et al., 2020). Compared with fluorescence, PAI, an emerging new imaging method, which offers deeper penetration, can improve imaging contrast and spatial resolution of superficial tissue. Thus PAI is expected to be a new method for early diagnosis and staging of early liver cancer in the near future (Fu et al., 2019).
Nanoparticles (NPs) could integrate diagnostic and therapeutic agents into one nanosystem in the field of cancer diagnostics and therapy. For instance, lipid micelles could act as drug carriers, and many lipid-based NPs have been approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for clinical tumor treatments (Mitchell et al., 2021). Apart from lipid, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs), as a class of inorganic materials, has been widely researched as drug/gene/molecular carriers for cancer theranostic (Lee et al., 2011; Li et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2011). Compared with lipid micelles, MSNs are precisely formulated with controllable particle size, morphology and structure. As liver is the main organ that sequesters majority of nanoparticles from blood circulation, nanoparticles can intrinsically target liver. From this point, MSNs can enhance the liver accumulation of imaging agents and enable effective liver targeting. Furthermore, MSNs modified with targeting ligand on the surface could accumulate in the tumor tissues by active targeting (Chen F. et al., 2013; Goel et al., 2014; Li et al., 2018a; Rosenholm et al., 2009; Zhang J. et al., 2013). Since the size of nanomaterials below 200 nm could accumulate in solid tumors via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect (Matsumura and Maeda, 1986). The MSNs with size between 50 and 200 nm could accumulate in tumors as the leaky vessels enable NP extravasation, which is also called passive targeting strategy (Chen Z. et al., 2020; Li et al., 2016; Meng et al., 2011). Graft PEG or its derivatives onto the surface of MSNs can not only stabilize the NPs in the aqueous solution, but can escape opsonization in the blood. The 50-nm MSNs coated with PEI-PEG copolymer showed passive accumulation of about 12% at the tumor site, only 3% when coating with a 5 kD PEG polymer (Tang et al., 2012). Besides, the excellent biocompatibility and low hemolytic activity of MSNs offers promising potential in clinical applications (Asefa and Tao, 2012; Chen Y. et al., 2013; Tarn et al., 2013). These advantages offer enormous opportunities for designing MSNs-based nanocomposites for bioimaging and cancer therapy (Chen et al., 2016; Fan et al., 2014; Hong et al., 2017; Liu S. et al., 2020; Singh et al., 2012). Inspiringly, the multifunctional theranostic system can control the quantity of drug molecular and imaging contrast agents simultaneously for effective and safe theranostics. (Zhao et al., 2012). Multimodal imaging, compared with single imaging modal, showed higher spatial resolution and sensitivity. And multimodal imaging-guided treatments have been developed for precision synergistic cancer therapy (Sun et al., 2018). Herein, we focus on the recent advances of MSNs based imaging agents for HCC detection. The intent is to give the readers a critical discussion of the design and applications of MSNs based imaging agents.
Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles
With the dramatic development of nanotechnology and nanomedicine during past decades, oceans of organic/inorganic nanomaterials have been designed for cancer therapy and diagnosis. Especially, benefit from the unique qualities of tunable particle size, large pore volume, high surface area, facile surface functionalization, as well as excellent biocompatibility and biodegradation, MSNs has been produced as nanocarriers for the art of cancer diagnostics (Caltagirone et al., 2015; Montalti et al., 2014; Ni et al., 2017; Tang et al., 2012). For biomedical applications, the size and morphology of MSNs are critical for cellular uptake (Zhang et al., 2009). It was estimated that the maximum uptake size of MSNs by cells was the diameter of 50 nm (Lu et al., 2009). The rates of endocytosis for MSNs with different morphology were similar for CHO cells, while differed for fibroblast cells (Trewyn et al., 2008). Besides, the cytotoxicity (Yu et al., 2011), biodistribution (Fu et al., 2013; He et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2016) and excretion (Croissant et al., 2017) of MSNs are also attracted much attention. The silica particle size of 100–500 nm showed low cytotoxicity (Hadipour Moghaddam et al., 2019), and the number of silanol groups affects the hemolytic properties (Slowing et al., 2009). MSNs were determined mainly distributed in the liver, spleen and lung after intravenous injection into mice (Huang et al., 2011). MSNs with negative charge showed higher uptake and retention in the liver, while positive charged MSNs undergo rapid hepatobiliary excretion and transport into the gastrointestinal tract (Souris et al., 2010). In this section, we summarized the synthesis method of MSNs and the way of controlling the pore size/volume of MSNs.
Design and Synthesis of MSNs
With over 20-years development since discovered by Kuroda’s and Kresge’s groups in 1990s (Yanagisawa et al., 1990), MSNs possess certain unique advantages, such as extensive and uniform mesoporosity, tunable particle size (10–1,000 nm), wide-range pore diameter (2–20 nm), flexible morphology and so on. Mesoporous silica is usually produced by a surfactant-directing method under basic, acidic or neutral conditions. Silica precursors are first hydrolyzed and combined with the head groups of surfactants by either electrostatic force or hydrogen bond interaction to form a liquid-crystalline mesophase. Then the transformation of mesophases occurs during the hydrolysis and condensation of silica species. The interactions between surfactants and silica precursors, as well as the rate of hydrolysis and condensation of silica species which heavily depend on the pH value of the reaction system, directly affect the formation and the morphology of mesophases (Narayan et al., 2018).
Silica nanoparticles with good monodispersity were synthesized by catalyzing tetraethyl orthosilicate with ammonia by stöber in 1968 (Stöber et al., 1968). Since then, many researchers reported the MSNs with various sizes from nano to micro via modified stöber method (Hao et al., 2015; Slowing et al., 2007; Taylor et al., 2008; Wan and Zhao, 2007; Wu et al., 2013). And several groups committed to design and synthesis superb MSNs. For example, Zhao’s group prepared well-ordered hexagonal mesoporous silica structures (SBA-15) using triblock copolymer (Zhao et al., 1998). Bein and co-workers presented a general method for the preparation of highly dispersed MSNs ranging in size from 40 to 150 nm (Kobler et al., 2008). Subsequently, Shi’s group reported the MSNs with the uniform size of 25–105 nm by following Bein’s protocol with a certain modification (Pan et al., 2012). Nanopore-engineering strategy endows functional materials with versatile moieties and promotes the development of various imaging modalities.
Controlling of Pore Size/Volume
Biofunctional materials encapsulated into the cavities or the mesopores of MSNs to fabricate potential nanotheranostic platforms. The pore sizes/volumes of MSNs influence the effect of therapy or diagnostics. For example, MSNs with large pore volume possessed high loading capacities for anti-cancer drugs, and showed enhanced cytotoxicity (Li and Shi, 2014). As a matter of fact, the pore sizes of these mesoporous nanostructures are usually very small (2–5 nm), resulting from the use of cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) or other alkylammonium surfactants as templates, which greatly hindered their further bio-applications in the encapsulation of biomacromolecules (Slowing et al., 2006; Xuan et al., 2016). Therefore, many new approaches have been developed to enhance the drug storage capacity of MSNs (Feng et al., 2016; Trewyn et al., 2007; Vallet-Regi et al., 2007; Vivero-Escoto et al., 2010).
One way to adjust the pore size is that, utilizing of a swelling agent during the synthetic process of MSNs, the pore sizes of MSNs were expanded up to 45 nm for higher protein loading capacity by mixing oil phase (chlorobenzene and tetraethyl orthosilicate) (Xu et al., 2015). The pore structure of MSNs was formed through a supramolecular self-assembly mechanism, which could be influenced by the oil/water ratio, stirring rate, and growth time in the synthetic process. Shi et al. synthesized monodispersed, large-pore silica nanospheres, with three different mesostructures (hexagonal, cubic and lamellar) by adjusting the amount of CTAB (Niu et al., 2014). With the increase of the concentration of CTAB, the micelles morphologically transformed from lamellar to rod-like or spherical. Subsequently, the formed micelles were sell-assembled to the ordered long period stacking mesostructures. A study reported the monodispersed MSNs with large pores, using 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene as pore swelling agents (Kim et al., 2011). The mean pore sizes of these MSNs were increased dramatically from 2.1 to 23 nm. The pore structure of stellate, raspberry, or worm-like morphologies was developed based on the nature and the concentration of small organic amines together with an appropriate choice of the cationic surfactant counterions (Zhang K. et al., 2013).
Besides, hollow MSNs were designed for increasing the pore volume to improve the loading capacity (Hu et al., 2011), and had been used in many research fields, such as catalysis (Fang et al., 2013; Mahmoud et al., 2013), drug/gene delivery (Li et al., 2017; Ma et al., 2013; Slowing et al., 2008) and bioimaging (Lou et al., 2008; Lv et al., 2014; Zhao and Jiang, 2009). For example, Yang et al. reported a new type of hollow MSNs (HMSNs) with enhanced loading capacity, and fabricated the nanocomposite of FePt nanoparticles for evaluating the therapy and diagnostics effects on Hela cells (Lin et al., 2017). The nanocomposite showed synergistic anticancer effects and could serve as dark T2 contrast agent for MRI. In another research, the rattle-type mesoporous silica hollow spheres were reported by using a selective etching strategy (Chen et al., 2009). The silica nanorattles were synthesized by etching the middle layer of the silica framework.
Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle Based Diagnosis
Ultrasound Imaging
Ultrasound (US) imaging is the most common and primary technique to screen many different diseases, because of its simplicity, flexibility, non-invasive and low cost (Kiessling et al., 2014). US contrast agents are usually comprised of several micro gas bubbles, which is stabilized by shell made of lipids, proteins or polymers, which can improve the definition and resolution of ultrasonic image (Sirsi and Borden, 2009). The main shortcomings of microbubbles are their micron size and poor stability, which hinder their applications for diagnosis. To cope with this, MSNs-based US contrast agents has been developed and generated bubbles with lifetime of 30 min at least (Jin et al., 2017). By actively targeting strategies, MSNs could serve as promising US contrast agents for HCC diagnosis. Silica-based US imaging agents can conjugate with epithelial cell-adhesion molecule (EpCAM) aptamer as targeted diagnostics agents for the HCC cell line (HepG2) (Pilapong et al., 2017). The US signal showed an enhancement effect in vitro due to the extraordinary mesoporous structure. Meanwhile, considering the high levels express of glypican-3 protein (GPC-3) on HepG2 cells, it has been deemed as a marker of HCC. For instance, the GPC-3 ligand peptide-functionalized silica nanoparticles demonstrated significantly enhanced ultrasound intensity for HepG2 cells ultrasound molecular imaging (Di Paola et al., 2017).
With the characteristics of real-time and inexpensive, US has been reported in guiding therapy as well (Wang et al., 2013). After intravenous injection of US imaging agent in HCC tumor-bearing nude mice, the US imaging showed brightened in tumor tissues. The nanoparticles accumulated in tumor tissues, and this phenomenon can be explained by the EPR effects. In general, silica-based US imaging agents reduced the toxicity of gas release in traditional gas-filled microbubbles and it is facile to functionalize targeted agents or drugs on the surface of MSNs. However, the current research mainly focused on the enhancement of the ultrasound contrast for cells, the distribution, metabolism, specificity and sensitivity of agents in the animal model need more accurately evaluation.
Photoacoustic Imaging
PAI integrates optical and ultrasound imaging, a non-ionizing imaging modality, and offers deeper penetration than pure optical imaging and richer optical contrasts than US imaging (Kim et al., 2016). Hence, PAI has attracted much attention in biological tissues detection. Hyaluronate derivatives have been investigated as a target-specific delivery to liver, owing to the overexpression of cluster determinant 44, which was regarded as the HA receptor. Lee et al. developed a hyaluronate–silica nanoparticle containing a certain amount of nitrogen atoms as a liver targeting PA contrast agent, which showed high liver-specific targeting efficiency (Lee et al., 2018). Nitrogen atoms play to the formation of nonbonding or defective sites, the sites between the bandgap of silica nanoparticles result in the increase of light absorption. The boundary of the liver in the PA imaging showed highly clear after intravenous injection of contrast agent for 12 h. This novel PA contrast agent could provide more details. Li and co-workers reported a novel 2-dimension composite nanoplatform by coating a thin mesoporous-silica shell onto the surface of Ti3C2 MXene for PA imaging, the composite nanosheets showed excellent optical and ultrasound imaging effects grounded on the localized surface plasmon resonance effect (Li et al., 2018b). Furthermore, doxorubicin was loaded into the nanostructures for synergistic chemotherapy and photothermal therapy. The in vivo PA imaging demonstrated that the composite nanosheets could be applied as PA contrast agents for real-time monitoring of the therapeutic process. More recently, Chaudhary et al. explored a series of indocyanine green (ICG) loaded MSN-based nano-carriers with various surface modifications for PAI (Chaudhary et al., 2019). The ICG loaded layer-by-layer polyelectrolyte coating MSN (LBLMSN-ICG) exhibited 4-times enhanced PA signal in vitro in comparison with the same concentration of pure ICG.
The mesosilica materials not only acted as carriers, but endows the 2D sheets with well-defined mesopores for multimodal diagnostic and therapy. The as-synthesized nanocomposites still need carefully control on the thickness of silica-shell and the uniformity of mesopore structure.
Fluorescence Imaging
As a classic near infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging agent, ICG has been approved by FDA for clinical applications in 1958 (Frangioni, 2003). ICG is a low toxic and injectable NIR organic dye and has been widely used in clinical imaging, especially for precise surgical resection. (Quan et al., 2012). However, there are still some drawbacks that limit its biological applications, such as low fluorescence quantum yield in aqueous solutions, poor solubility in physiological aqueous conditions (Desmettre et al., 2000; Saxena et al., 2003).
Benefited from the high chemical stability and superb drug loading ability of MSNs, Tian and others developed arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD)-conjugated MSNs loaded with ICG for imaging-guided surgery (Zeng et al., 2016). And the RGD-conjugated MSNs could identify precise tumor margin (1 mm) during liver cancer surgery. Furthermore, the microtumor lesions (0.4 ± 0.21 mm) showed excellent optical contrast under NIR and GFP fluorescence images. ICG has been used as a near-infrared photothermal therapy reagent for its high photothermal conversion efficiency. More recently, Chang’s group reported a multifunctional (ICG + sorafenib)@mSiO2 nanosystem for highly efficient synergistic diagnosis and treatment of HCC (Yang et al., 2020). The nanosystem showed outstanding real-time fluorescence imaging, which was responsive to 808 nm laser irradiation. Notably, the silica nanosystem endows the ICG with a higher level of endocytosis and longer red fluorescence signal retention.
Besides, fluorescent conjugated polymers is another choice for fluorescence imaging agent, because of their high quantum efficiency, good photostability, and fast radiative rate (Feng et al., 2008). An efficient controlled release system has been realized by a biofunctional nanocomposite for pH-controlled drug delivery and cellular imaging simultaneously, capping with polyelectrolytes at the outer surface of MSNs (Pu et al., 2013). Hydrophobic conjugated polymers have been converted into dispersible in the aqueous environment by silica encapsulation strategies, which makes them excellent candidates for fluorescence probes of HCC cells (Tan et al., 2011). The conjugated polymers with different emissions can be realized by employing other fluorescent conjugated polymers to emit a blue, green, yellow, and red color. Fluorescent conjugated polymers could be a powerful tool for cell imaging with silica encapsulation strategies.
Moreover, MSNs were decorated with Aggregation Induced Emission (AIE) fluorogen PhENH2 and MoS2 nanosheets for both tumor diagnosis and treatment (Wang J. et al., 2019). The AIE fluorogens which chemically modified on the surface of MSNs showed more stable fluorescence than physically absorbed luminescent molecules. As for fluorescent bioprobes, the challenge is how to solve the problem of frequently quenching in high concentrations or aggregate states. AIE-based materials shed new light on fluorescence imaging.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
MRI is recognized as the most popular technology for evaluating the liver tissue owing to its ultrahigh sensitivity and specificity (Bellin et al., 2003). Gadolinium chelates, as a non-specific extracellular contrast, are used extensively for liver MRI in clinical medicine.
In order to enhance MRI imaging effect, both passive and active targeting strategies have been adopted to increase the accumulation of imaging agents in tumors. In consideration of the very short blood circulation time of Gd-EOB-DTPA, loading Gd (III) chelates into MSNs could act as a promising T1 MRI imaging contrast agent for cancer diagnostics (Vivero-Escoto et al., 2011). Although there are still great concerns about the possibility of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis resulting from the Gd3+ ions, this platform provides a choice for alleviating the safety concerns (Broome, 2008; Rydahl et al., 2008). Recently, Mn-doping MSNs has been reported as the contrast agent for T1-weighted MRI, with the accumulation in the tumor confirmed due to the EPR effects (Yu et al., 2016). The manganese-doped hollow MSNs were sensitive to tumor microenvironment, resulting in the breaking up of the Mn-O bond and releasing of manganese ions. To a certain extent, the “manganese extraction” strategy ravel out concerns about the biodegradation of inorganic mesoporous nanosystems and provides a fresh idea for biodegradation of inorganic material nanofamily. In order to address the limitations of non-specific contrast agents, Kim et al. investigated the liver-specific MRI contrast agent, Mn2+-doped SiO2 nanoparticles (Mn-SiO2), enhancing the visibility of HCC lesion (Kim et al., 2013). The liver-to-HCC MR contrast ratio could be used for the conspicuous detection of HCC. The maximum signal enhancement of the liver parenchyma was observed in the images after intravenously administered via the tail vein for 6 h. They proposed that the nanoparticles engulfed in Kupffer cells would release the Mn2+ ions, thus T1-weighted MRI showed hyperintense in healthy liver tissues with abundant Kupffer cells over lesions.
Superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) particles, acting as a negative contrast agent, were used in liver-specific contrast imaging (Lee et al., 2007; Na et al., 2009). Uniform magnetic MSNs were prepared by coating Fe3O4 core with mesoporous silica shells, which could be used for the enhancement of T2-weighted MR imaging (An et al., 2015). Benefit from the easily surface functional of silica coating layer, magnetic MSNs can be modifed with folic acid for targeted delivery and real-time tumor monitoring. (Chi et al., 2019).
Otherthan the passive and active targeted by modified with cellular receptors, magnetic targeting technology is a very attractive physical targeting technology (Hajba and Guttman, 2016; Tian et al., 2014). Magnetic MSNs could be magnetically targeted to tumor tissues in HepG2 xenograft-bearing nude mice using small NdFeB permanent magnets (Wang et al., 2018). Similarly, magnetic field not only accumulated MSN-coated iron oxide nanoparticles, but also controlled the “OFF-ON” state of the magnetic drug delivery system (Liu J. et al., 2020). SPIOs act as an excellent biocompatible inorganic material, on which various thicknesses of silica coating can be realized for enhanced MR imaging. But the concern is that, SPIOs are no longer clinically used for MRI agents as a result of some drawbacks. More efforts on magnetic MSNs for clinical transformation could be in vain until SPIOs were re-approved by FDA.
Computed Tomography
CT is one of the most common modalities for diagnostics of disease or cancer since its rapid image generation and low cost (Foley et al., 2000). Small iodinated molecules, usually used as CT contrast agents in clinical, experienced fast renal excretion and short imaging time hinder their applications (Kim et al., 2010). Gold nanoparticles have attracted prominent interests owing to their strong X-ray attenuation properties, and have been widely used as CT contrast agents (Pelaz et al., 2017). Dong’s group developed a Janus-structured gold-MSNs act as targeted CT-imaging agents for HCC diagnosis (Wang et al., 2017). In vivo, the Janus nanoparticles exhibited a clearly distinguished CT signal in the corresponding tumor site of the tumor-bearing nude mice. The unsymmetrical structures of Janus nanoparticles provide higher radiation-absorption efficiency. The tumor targeted MSNs with gold gatekeeper showed higher CT signal intensity because of its EPR effects as well as active targeting through EpCAM receptor (Babaei et al., 2017). Qin et al. reported dual-MSNs containing small mesopores and large mesopores for gold nanorices encapsulation (Qin et al., 2019). They confirmed that multiple gold nanorices (GNRs) in a nanoscale matrix showed brighter CT signals with the increase of Au concentrations, and the hounsfeld unit values of MSN-based GNRs were higher than individual GNRs. These as-prepared nanocompound possess the potential for application in CT imaging and imaging-guided photothermal therapy. Mesoporous silica could coat on Au NPs for improving its hydrophilicity and drug loading dose. However, there is nearly no report about the relationship between CT signals and the thickness of silica coating for HCC diagnostic.
Multimodal Imaging
Multimodal imaging has been developed to satisfied the requirement of both high spatial resolution and high sensitivity for imaging diagnosis (Cutler et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2012; Sailor and Park, 2012; Zhang et al., 2015). Recently, multifunctional nanoparticles have been explored as multimodal imaging nanoprobes (Chu et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2018), or used for imaging-guided tumor therapy (Chen et al., 2018; Li et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2018; Shi et al., 2019; Song et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2019), or monitored therapeutic response (Ye et al., 2018). For instance, nanocomposites integrating near-infrared fluorescence with MRI and PAI exhibit ultrasensitivity, precise anatomical localization, and good spatial resolution for tumor detection (Wang et al., 2015).
As for HCC imaging, fluorochrome and iron oxide were loaded into silica nanoparticles for MRI and optical dual-mode imaging (Liu et al., 2021). And this dual-mode imaging was developed for a preoperative diagnosis of tumor cells and improving the spatial resolution during surgery (Tan et al., 2011). Conjugated polymers showed excellent fluorescent properties and could use as fluorescent labelling agents for cellular imaging. The nanocapsules combined conjugated polymers as the fluorescent emitter and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as the T2 enhanced MRI contrast agents. Both confocal microscopy images and MRI showed that the cellular uptake of the nanocapsules was enhanced by the external magnetic field. Over and above the fluorescent conjugated polymers, upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) as excellent UC luminescence agents have been used for accurate cancer diagnosis. The multifunctional composite combined with MnFe2O4 and UCNPs were magnetic guidance to the tumor for in vivo MR and UC luminescence imaging (Ding et al., 2019). Magnetic gadolinium oxide-iron oxide with mesoporous silica shell, presented the r1 and r2 values were 10 mM−1 s−1 and 165 mM−1 s−1, separately, and could be used as a T1 and T2 dual mode contrast agent. (Das et al., 2018). Inorganic Janus nanoparticle with extraordinary heterostructure could guide the cancer therapy by CT/MR imaging in vivo (Zhang et al., 2018).
Besides, triple-mode imaging agents including MRI, US, and fluorescence were developed for HCC cell lines imaging (Pilapong et al., 2017). The nanoprobe determined that the r2 value were 110.9 mM−1 s−1, and the porous structure of which enhanced US signals and reduced the side effects of gas release in conventional gas-filled microbubbles. The MRI/US/fluorescence imaging probe could visualize the microscopic-scale and macroscopic-scale of the HepG2. Another research focused on triple-mode upconversion luminescence (UCL)/CT/MR imaging-guided synergistic chemo-photothermal therapy of HCC (Chen X. et al., 2020). However, it was hard to maximize the diagnostics and treatment effects on “all in one” nanoplatforms, simultaneously.
Although more and more muti-model imaging agents were developed for precise diagnosis of HCC, the effect of combined agents still need deeper exploration. And the choice of suitable imaging modalities is significant for the art of an “all in one” system. Multifunctional nanoplatform can be designed for multimodal imaging guided multiple therapies. For example, tetra-modal imaging agents containing CT, MRI, UCL and photothermal imaging were produced and applied as drug carriers for multiple anticancer therapies (photothermal, photodynamic therapy, and chemo-therapy), simultaneously (Lv et al., 2015). As showed in Figure 1, MSNs based imaging agents could use in different imaging modalities. Table.1 summarized the MSNs-based nanomaterials for HCC imaging.
FIGURE 1. Different imaging modalities based on MSNs.
TABLE 1. MSNs-based nanomaterials for HCC imaging.
Discussion
In this mini-review, we discuss the recent advances in MSNs based imaging agents for HCC detection. We summarize the design and synthesis of MSNs with different sizes and morphologies. Several imaging agents can be incorporated into MSN for HCC detection, including US, PAI, Fluorescence imaging, MRI, and CT. These agents have shown excellent imaging performance in HCC detection and encourage further exploration. Besides, MSN based multi-model imaging probes has also been developed for preoperative diagnosis of tumor tissues, enriching the information of imaging diagnosis. Despite great potentials of MSN-based imaging agents for HCC detection, there is numerous hurdles lying in the way of MSN-based imaging agents heading to the clinical translation. For example, large-scale production, quality control and standard characterizations are also needed for the commercialization of MSN-based imaging agents. The targeting of MSN-based imaging agents still needs improvement, as a recent analysis shows that only 0.7% of nanoparticles in the systemic route can reach tumor sites. The toxicity, particularly long-term toxicity aroused from nanoparticles, requires systematic and comprehensive in vivo studies. It is hopeful that with the constant efforts of scientists, radiologists and businessmen, MSN-based imaging agents can make a great breakthrough for disease diagnosis and benefit patients in the near future.
We hope that this mini review will provide readers with a better understanding on the design and synthesis of the MSNs for cancer imaging applications. More importantly, the design of MSNs based imaging agents for HCC detection should consider the imaging model, biocompatibility, and pharmacokinetics. Additionally, it is important to meet the clinical needs of HCC detection, developing imaging contrast agents with potential clinical translational capacity make it sense.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author Contributions
All authors listed have made substantial, direct and intellectual contributions to the work, and approved it for publication.
Funding
This work was supported by the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (2017YFA0205201), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (81801817, 82003517, 81901876, and U1705281), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (20720190088 and 20720200019), Fujian Undergraduate Training Program for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (201812631010, JT180649, and HXJB-08), and the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University, China (NCET-13–0502).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
Useful suggestions given by Dr. Guangyu Sun of Yale University are also acknowledged.
References
An, J., Zhang, X., Guo, Q., Zhao, Y., Wu, Z., and Li, C. (2015). Glycopolymer Modified Magnetic Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for MR Imaging and Targeted Drug Delivery. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochemical Eng. Aspects 482, 98–108. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.04.035
Ariff, B., Lloyd, C. R., Khan, S., Shariff, M., Thillainayagam, A. V., Bansi, D. S., et al. (2009). Imaging of Liver Cancer. Wjg 15, 1289–1300. doi:10.3748/wjg.15.1289
Asefa, T., and Tao, Z. (2012). Biocompatibility of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 25, 2265–2284. doi:10.1021/tx300166u
Babaei, M., Abnous, K., Taghdisi, S. M., Amel Farzad, S., Peivandi, M. T., Ramezani, M., et al. (2017). Synthesis of Theranostic Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule Targeted Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle with Gold Gatekeeper for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Nanomedicine 12, 1261–1279. doi:10.2217/nnm-2017-0028
Befeler, A. S., and Di Bisceglie, A. M. (2002). Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Diagnosis and Treatment. Gastroenterology 122, 1609–1619. doi:10.1053/gast.2002.33411
Bellin, M. F., Vasile, M., and Morel-Precetti, S. (2003). Currently Used Non-specific Extracellular MR Contrast media. Eur. Radiol. 13, 2688–2698. doi:10.1007/s00330-003-1912-x
Broome, D. R. (2008). Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis Associated with Gadolinium Based Contrast Agents: a Summary of the Medical Literature Reporting. Eur. J. Radiol. 66, 230–234. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.011
Cai, W., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Wang, Z., Tian, Y., Liu, H., et al. (2020). Engineering the Surface of Gd2O3 Nanoplates for Improved T1-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Chem. Eng. J. 380, 122473. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.122473
Caltagirone, C., Bettoschi, A., Garau, A., and Montis, R. (2015). Silica-based Nanoparticles: a Versatile Tool for the Development of Efficient Imaging Agents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 4645–4671. doi:10.1039/c4cs00270a
Chaudhary, Z., Khan, G. M., Abeer, M. M., Pujara, N., Wan-Chi Tse, B., McGuckin, M. A., et al. (2019). Efficient Photoacoustic Imaging Using Indocyanine green (ICG) Loaded Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. Biomater. Sci. 7, 5002–5015. doi:10.1039/c9bm00822e
Chen, D., Li, L., Tang, F., and Qi, S. (2009). Facile and Scalable Synthesis of Tailored Silica “Nanorattle” Structures. Adv. Mater. 21, 3804–3807. doi:10.1002/adma.200900599
Chen, F., Hong, H., Zhang, Y., Valdovinos, H. F., Shi, S., Kwon, G. S., et al. (2013a). In Vivo Tumor Targeting and Image-Guided Drug Delivery with Antibody-Conjugated, Radiolabeled Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 7, 9027–9039. doi:10.1021/nn403617j
Chen, H., Cheng, H., Dai, Q., Cheng, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, D., et al. (2020a). A Superstable Homogeneous Lipiodol-ICG Formulation for Locoregional Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment. J. Controlled Release 323, 635–643. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.04.021
Chen, H., Qiu, Y., Ding, D., Lin, H., Sun, W., Wang, G. D., et al. (2018). Gadolinium‐Encapsulated Graphene Carbon Nanotheranostics for Imaging‐Guided Photodynamic Therapy. Adv. Mater. 30, 1802748. doi:10.1002/adma.201802748
Chen, M., Tang, S., Guo, Z., Wang, X., Mo, S., Huang, X., et al. (2014). Core-shell Pd@Au Nanoplates as Theranostic Agents for In-Vivo Photoacoustic Imaging, CT Imaging, and Photothermal Therapy. Adv. Mater. 26, 8210–8216. doi:10.1002/adma.201404013
Chen, X., Liu, Z., Parker, S. G., Zhang, X., Gooding, J. J., Ru, Y., et al. (2016). Light-Induced Hydrogel Based on Tumor-Targeting Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as a Theranostic Platform for Sustained Cancer Treatment. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 8, 15857–15863. doi:10.1021/acsami.6b02562
Chen, X., Song, L., Li, X., Zhang, L., Li, L., Zhang, X., et al. (2020b). Co-delivery of Hydrophilic/hydrophobic Drugs by Multifunctional Yolk-Shell Nanoparticles for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Theranostics. Chem. Eng. J. 389, 124416. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.124416
Chen, Y., Chen, H., and Shi, J. (2013b). In Vivo Bio-Safety Evaluations and Diagnostic/Therapeutic Applications of Chemically Designed Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 25, 3144–3176. doi:10.1002/adma.201205292
Chen, Z., Wan, L., Yuan, Y., Kuang, Y., Xu, X., Liao, T., et al. (2020c). pH/GSH-Dual-Sensitive Hollow Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery System for Targeted Cancer Therapy. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 6, 3375–3387. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00073
Cheng, L., Liu, J., Gu, X., Gong, H., Shi, X., Liu, T., et al. (2014). PEGylated WS2Nanosheets as a Multifunctional Theranostic Agent for In Vivo Dual-Modal CT/Photoacoustic Imaging Guided Photothermal Therapy. Adv. Mater. 26, 1886–1893. doi:10.1002/adma.201304497
Chi, X., Zhang, R., Zhao, T., Gong, X., Wei, R., Yin, Z., et al. (2019). Targeted Arsenite-Loaded Magnetic Multifunctional Nanoparticles for Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Nanotechnology 30, 175101. doi:10.1088/1361-6528/aaff9e
Chu, C., Yu, J., Ren, E., Ou, S., Zhang, Y., Wu, Y., et al. (2020). Multimodal Photoacoustic Imaging‐Guided Regression of Corneal Neovascularization: A Non‐Invasive and Safe Strategy. Adv. Sci. 7, 2000346. doi:10.1002/advs.202000346
Croissant, J. G., Fatieiev, Y., and Khashab, N. M. (2017). Degradability and Clearance of Silicon, Organosilica, Silsesquioxane, Silica Mixed Oxide, and Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 29, 1604634. doi:10.1002/adma.20160463410.1002/adma.201604634
Cutler, C. S., Hennkens, H. M., Sisay, N., Huclier-Markai, S., and Jurisson, S. S. (2013). Radiometals for Combined Imaging and Therapy. Chem. Rev. 113, 858–883. doi:10.1021/cr3003104
Das, R. K., Pramanik, A., Majhi, M., and Mohapatra, S. (2018). Magnetic Mesoporous Silica Gated with Doped Carbon Dot for Site-specific Drug Delivery, Fluorescence, and MR Imaging. Langmuir 34, 5253–5262. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b04268
Desmettre, T., Devoisselle, J. M., and Mordon, S. (2000). Fluorescence Properties and Metabolic Features of Indocyanine green (ICG) as Related to Angiography. Surv. Ophthalmol. 45, 15–27. doi:10.1016/s0039-6257(00)00123-5
Di Paola, M., Quarta, A., Conversano, F., Sbenaglia, E. A., Bettini, S., Valli, L., et al. (2017). Human Hepatocarcinoma Cell Targeting by Glypican-3 Ligand Peptide Functionalized Silica Nanoparticles: Implications for Ultrasound Molecular Imaging. Langmuir 33, 4490–4499. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00327
Ding, B., Shao, S., Xiao, H., Sun, C., Cai, X., Jiang, F., et al. (2019). MnFe2O4-decorated Large-Pore Mesoporous Silica-Coated Upconversion Nanoparticles for Near-Infrared Light-Induced and O2 Self-Sufficient Photodynamic Therapy. Nanoscale 11, 14654–14667. doi:10.1039/c9nr04858h
El-Serag, H. B., Marrero, J. A., Rudolph, L., and Reddy, K. R. (2008). Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterology 134, 1752–1763. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.090
Fan, W., Shen, B., Bu, W., Chen, F., He, Q., Zhao, K., et al. (2014). A Smart Upconversion-Based Mesoporous Silica Nanotheranostic System for Synergetic Chemo-/radio-/photodynamic Therapy and Simultaneous MR/UCL Imaging. Biomaterials 35, 8992–9002. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.024
Fang, X., Zhao, X., Fang, W., Chen, C., and Zheng, N. (2013). Self-templating Synthesis of Hollow Mesoporous Silica and Their Applications in Catalysis and Drug Delivery. Nanoscale 5, 2205–2218. doi:10.1039/c3nr34006f
Feng, F., He, F., An, L., Wang, S., Li, Y., and Zhu, D. (2008). Fluorescent Conjugated Polyelectrolytes for Biomacromolecule Detection. Adv. Mater. 20, 2959–2964. doi:10.1002/adma.200800624
Feng, Y., Panwar, N., Tng, D. J. H., Tjin, S. C., Wang, K., and Yong, K.-T. (2016). The Application of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle Family in Cancer Theranostics. Coord. Chem. Rev. 319, 86–109. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2016.04.019
Foley, W. D., Mallisee, T. A., Hohenwalter, M. D., Wilson, C. R., Quiroz, F. A., and Taylor, A. J. (2000). Multiphase Hepatic CT with a Multirow Detector CT Scanner. Am. J. Roentgenology 175, 679–685. doi:10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750679
Frangioni, J. (2003). In Vivo near-infrared Fluorescence Imaging. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 7, 626–634. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2003.08.007
Fu, C., Liu, T., Li, L., Liu, H., Chen, D., and Tang, F. (2013). The Absorption, Distribution, Excretion and Toxicity of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles in Mice Following Different Exposure Routes. Biomaterials 34, 2565–2575. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.12.043
Fu, Q., Zhu, R., Song, J., Yang, H., and Chen, X. (2019). Photoacoustic Imaging: Contrast Agents and Their Biomedical Applications. Adv. Mater. 31, 1805875. doi:10.1002/adma.201805875
Goel, S., Chen, F., Hong, H., Valdovinos, H. F., Hernandez, R., Shi, S., et al. (2014). VEGF121-Conjugated Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle: A Tumor Targeted Drug Delivery System. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 6, 21677–21685. doi:10.1021/am506849p
Grobmyer, S., Singh, M. A., Hahn, L. G., Gutwein, M. C., Rule, J. A., Knapik, B. M., et al. (2012). Multi-dye Theranostic Nanoparticle Platform for Bioimaging and Cancer Therapy. Ijn 7, 2739–2750. doi:10.2147/IJN.S28357
Hadipour Moghaddam, S. P., Mohammadpour, R., and Ghandehari, H. (2019). In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Degradation, Toxicity, Biodistribution, and Clearance of Silica Nanoparticles as a Function of Size, Porosity, Density, and Composition. J. Controlled Release 311-312, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.08.028
Hajba, L., and Guttman, A. (2016). The Use of Magnetic Nanoparticles in Cancer Theranostics: Toward Handheld Diagnostic Devices. Biotechnol. Adv. 34, 354–361. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.02.001
Hao, N., Tang, F., and Li, L. (2015). MCM-41 Mesoporous Silica Sheet with Ordered Perpendicular Nanochannels for Protein Delivery and the Assembly of Ag Nanoparticles in Catalytic Applications. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 218, 223–227. doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.06.023
He, Q., Zhang, Z., Gao, F., Li, Y., and Shi, J. (2011). In Vivo biodistribution and Urinary Excretion of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles: Effects of Particle Size and PEGylation. Small 7, 271–280. doi:10.1002/smll.201001459
Hong, S. h., Kim, H., and Choi, Y. (2017). Indocyanine green-loaded Hollow Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as an Activatable Theranostic Agent. Nanotechnology 28, 185102. doi:10.1088/1361-6528/aa66b0
Hu, J., Chen, M., Fang, X., and Wu, L. (2011). Fabrication and Application of Inorganic Hollow Spheres. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 5472–5491. doi:10.1039/c1cs15103g
Hu, S., Kiesewetter, D. O., Zhu, L., Guo, N., Gao, H., Liu, G., et al. (2012). Longitudinal PET Imaging of Doxorubicin-Induced Cell Death with 18F-Annexin V. Mol. Imaging Biol. 14, 762–770. doi:10.1007/s11307-012-0551-5
Hu, Z., Fang, C., Li, B., Zhang, Z., Cao, C., Cai, M., et al. (2020). First-in-human Liver-Tumour Surgery Guided by Multispectral Fluorescence Imaging in the Visible and Near-Infrared-I/II Windows. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 259–271. doi:10.1038/s41551-019-0494-0
Huang, X., Li, L., Liu, T., Hao, N., Liu, H., Chen, D., et al. (2011). The Shape Effect of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles on Biodistribution, Clearance, and Biocompatibility In Vivo. Acs Nano 5, 5390–5399. doi:10.1021/nn200365a
Jin, Q., Lin, C.-Y., Kang, S.-T., Chang, Y.-C., Zheng, H., Yang, C.-M., et al. (2017). Superhydrophobic Silica Nanoparticles as Ultrasound Contrast Agents. Ultrason. Sonochem. 36, 262–269. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.12.001
Kiessling, F., Fokong, S., Bzyl, J., Lederle, W., Palmowski, M., and Lammers, T. (2014). Recent Advances in Molecular, Multimodal and Theranostic Ultrasound Imaging. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 72, 15–27. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2013.11.013
Kim, D., Jeong, Y. Y., and Jon, S. (2010). A Drug-Loaded Aptamer−Gold Nanoparticle Bioconjugate for Combined CT Imaging and Therapy of Prostate Cancer. Acs Nano 4, 3689–3696. doi:10.1021/nn901877h
Kim, J., Park, S., Jung, Y., Chang, S., Park, J., Zhang, Y., et al. (2016). Programmable Real-Time Clinical Photoacoustic and Ultrasound Imaging System. Sci. Rep. 6, 35137. doi:10.1038/srep35137
Kim, M.-H., Na, H.-K., Kim, Y.-K., Ryoo, S.-R., Cho, H. S., Lee, K. E., et al. (2011). Facile Synthesis of Monodispersed Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles with Ultralarge Pores and Their Application in Gene Delivery. Acs Nano 5, 3568–3576. doi:10.1021/nn103130q
Kim, S. M., Im, G. H., Lee, D.-G., Lee, J. H., Lee, W. J., and Lee, I. S. (2013). Mn2+-doped Silica Nanoparticles for Hepatocyte-Targeted Detection of Liver Cancer in T1-Weighted MRI. Biomaterials 34, 8941–8948. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.009
Kobler, J., Möller, K., and Bein, T. (2008). Colloidal Suspensions of Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. Acs Nano 2, 791–799. doi:10.1021/nn700008s
Lee, D.-E., Koo, H., Sun, I.-C., Ryu, J. H., Kim, K., and Kwon, I. C. (2012). Multifunctional Nanoparticles for Multimodal Imaging and Theragnosis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 2656–2672. doi:10.1039/c2cs15261d
Lee, D., Beack, S., Yoo, J., Kim, S.-K., Lee, C., Kwon, W., et al. (2018). In Vivo Photoacoustic Imaging of Livers Using Biodegradable Hyaluronic Acid-Conjugated Silica Nanoparticles. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1800941. doi:10.1002/adfm.201800941
Lee, J.-H., Huh, Y.-M., Jun, Y.-w., Seo, J.-w., Jang, J.-t., Song, H.-T., et al. (2007). Artificially Engineered Magnetic Nanoparticles for Ultra-sensitive Molecular Imaging. Nat. Med. 13, 95–99. doi:10.1038/nm1467
Lee, J. E., Lee, N., Kim, T., Kim, J., and Hyeon, T. (2011). Multifunctional Mesoporous Silica Nanocomposite Nanoparticles for Theranostic Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 893–902. doi:10.1021/ar2000259
Lei, Z., Zeng, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, X., and Liu, G. (2020). Photoacoustic Reporter Genes for Noninvasive Molecular Imaging and Theranostics. J. Innov. Opt. Health Sci. 13, 2030005. doi:10.1142/s1793545820300050
Li, D., Dai, Q., Chen, H., Lin, H., Lu, Z., Zheng, H., et al. (2021). Metal-organic Nanostructure Based on TixOy/Ruthenium Reaction Units: For CT/MR Imaging-Guided X-ray Induced Dynamic Therapy. Chem. Eng. J. 417, 129262. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.129262
Li, L., Liu, T., Fu, C., Meng, X., and Liu, H. (2016). Size Effect of Mesoporous and Hollow Silica Nanoparticles on Solid Tumor Targeting and Penetration. j nanosci nanotechnol 16, 6766–6772. doi:10.1166/jnn.2016.11372
Li, T., Shi, S., Goel, S., Shen, X., Xie, X., Chen, Z., et al. (2019). Recent Advancements in Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles towards Therapeutic Applications for Cancer. Acta Biomater. 89, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.031
Li, Y., Li, N., Pan, W., Yu, Z., Yang, L., and Tang, B. (2017). Hollow Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles with Tunable Structures for Controlled Drug Delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 9, 2123–2129. doi:10.1021/acsami.6b13876
Li, Y., and Shi, J. (2014). Hollow-Structured Mesoporous Materials: Chemical Synthesis, Functionalization and Applications. Adv. Mater. 26, 3176–3205. doi:10.1002/adma.201305319
Li, Z., Han, J., Yu, L., Qian, X., Xing, H., Lin, H., et al. (2018a). Synergistic Sonodynamic/Chemotherapeutic Suppression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Targeted Biodegradable Mesoporous Nanosonosensitizers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1800145. doi:10.1002/adfm.201800145
Li, Z., Zhang, H., Han, J., Chen, Y., Lin, H., and Yang, T. (2018b). Surface Nanopore Engineering of 2D MXenes for Targeted and Synergistic Multitherapies of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Adv. Mater. 30, 1706981. doi:10.1002/adma.201706981
Lin, C.-Y., Li, W.-P., Huang, S.-P., Yeh, C.-S., and Yang, C.-M. (2017). Hollow Mesoporous Silica Nanosphere-Supported FePt Nanoparticles for Potential Theranostic Applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 5, 7598–7607. doi:10.1039/c7tb01812f
Lin, G., Zhang, Y., Zhu, C., Chu, C., Shi, Y., Pang, X., et al. (2018). Photo-excitable Hybrid Nanocomposites for Image-Guided Photo/TRAIL Synergistic Cancer Therapy. Biomaterials 176, 60–70. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.05.036
Lin, H., Li, S., Wang, J., Chu, C., Zhang, Y., Pang, X., et al. (2019a). A Single-step Multi-Level Supramolecular System for Cancer Sonotheranostics. Nanoscale Horiz. 4, 190–195. doi:10.1039/c8nh00276b
Lin, X., Zhang, X., Wang, S., Liang, X., Xu, Y., Chen, M., et al. (2019b). Intraoperative Identification and Guidance of Breast Cancer Microfoci Using Ultrasound and Near-Infrared Fluorescence Dual-Modality Imaging. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2, 2252–2261. doi:10.1021/acsabm.9b00206
Liu, H., Chu, C., Liu, Y., Pang, X., Wu, Y., Zhou, Z., et al. (2018). Novel Intrapolymerization Doped Manganese-Eumelanin Coordination Nanocomposites with Ultrahigh Relaxivity and Their Application in Tumor Theranostics. Adv. Sci. 5, 1800032. doi:10.1002/advs.201800032
Liu, J., Liu, W., Zhang, K., Shi, J., and Zhang, Z. (2020a). A Magnetic Drug Delivery System with "OFF-ON" State via Specific Molecular Recognition and Conformational Changes for Precise Tumor Therapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 9, 1901316. doi:10.1002/adhm.201901316
Liu, L., Xu, X., Liang, X., Zhang, X., Wen, J., Chen, K., et al. (2021). Periodic Mesoporous Organosilica-Coated Magnetite Nanoparticles Combined with Lipiodol for Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization to Inhibit the Progression of Liver Cancer. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 591, 211–220. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2021.02.022
Liu, S., Li, W., Dong, S., Zhang, F., Dong, Y., Tian, B., et al. (2020b). An All-In-One Theranostic Nanoplatform Based on Upconversion Dendritic Mesoporous Silica Nanocomposites for Synergistic Chemodynamic/photodynamic/gas Therapy. Nanoscale 12, 24146–24161. doi:10.1039/d0nr06790c
Lou, X. W., Archer, L. A., and Yang, Z. (2008). Hollow Micro-/Nanostructures: Synthesis and Applications. Adv. Mater. 20, 3987–4019. doi:10.1002/adma.200800854
Lu, F., Wu, S.-H., Hung, Y., and Mou, C.-Y. (2009). Size Effect on Cell Uptake in Well-Suspended, Uniform Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. Small 5, 1408–1413. doi:10.1002/smll.200900005
Lv, R., Yang, P., Dai, Y., Gai, S., He, F., and Lin, J. (2014). Lutecium Fluoride Hollow Mesoporous Spheres with Enhanced Up-Conversion Luminescent Bioimaging and Light-Triggered Drug Release by Gold Nanocrystals. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 6, 15550–15563. doi:10.1021/am504347e
Lv, R., Yang, P., He, F., Gai, S., Li, C., Dai, Y., et al. (2015). A Yolk-like Multifunctional Platform for Multimodal Imaging and Synergistic Therapy Triggered by a Single Near-Infrared Light. ACS Nano 9, 1630–1647. doi:10.1021/nn5063613
Ma, X., Zhao, Y., Ng, K. W., and Zhao, Y. (2013). Integrated Hollow Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Target drug/siRNA Co-delivery. Chem. Eur. J. 19, 15593–15603. doi:10.1002/chem.201302736
Mahmoud, M. A., O’Neil, D., and El-Sayed, M. A. (2013). Hollow and Solid Metallic Nanoparticles in Sensing and in Nanocatalysis. Chem. Mater. 26, 44–58. doi:10.1021/cm4020892
Matsumura, Y., and Maeda, H. (1986). A New Concept for Macromolecular Therapeutics in Cancer Chemotherapy: Mechanism of Tumoritropic Accumulation of Proteins and the Antitumor Agent Smancs. Cancer Res. 46, 6387–6392. doi:10.1016/0304-3835(86)90075-3
Meng, H., Xue, M., Xia, T., Ji, Z., Tarn, D. Y., Zink, J. I., et al. (2011). Use of Size and a Copolymer Design Feature to Improve the Biodistribution and the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect of Doxorubicin-Loaded Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles in a Murine Xenograft Tumor Model. Acs Nano 5, 4131–4144. doi:10.1021/nn200809t
Mitchell, M. J., Billingsley, M. M., Haley, R. M., Wechsler, M. E., Peppas, N. A., and Langer, R. (2021). Engineering Precision Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovdrug Discovery 20, 101–124. doi:10.1038/s41573-020-0090-8
Montalti, M., Prodi, L., Rampazzo, E., and Zaccheroni, N. (2014). Dye-doped Silica Nanoparticles as Luminescent Organized Systems for Nanomedicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 4243–4268. doi:10.1039/c3cs60433k
Na, H. B., Song, I. C., and Hyeon, T. (2009). Inorganic Nanoparticles for MRI Contrast Agents. Adv. Mater. 21, 2133–2148. doi:10.1002/adma.200802366
Narayan, R., Nayak, U., Raichur, A., and Garg, S. (2018). Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles: A Comprehensive Review on Synthesis and Recent Advances. Pharmaceutics 10, 118. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics10030118
Ni, D., Bu, W., Ehlerding, E. B., Cai, W., and Shi, J. (2017). Engineering of Inorganic Nanoparticles as Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 7438–7468. doi:10.1039/c7cs00316a
Niu, D., Liu, Z., Li, Y., Luo, X., Zhang, J., Gong, J., et al. (2014). Monodispersed and Ordered Large-Pore Mesoporous Silica Nanospheres with Tunable Pore Structure for Magnetic Functionalization and Gene Delivery. Adv. Mater. 26, 4947–4953. doi:10.1002/adma.201400815
Pan, L., He, Q., Liu, J., Chen, Y., Ma, M., Zhang, L., et al. (2012). Nuclear-targeted Drug Delivery of TAT Peptide-Conjugated Monodisperse Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 5722–5725. doi:10.1021/ja211035w
Pelaz, B., Alexiou, C., Alvarez-Puebla, R. A., Alves, F., Andrews, A. M., Ashraf, S., et al. (2017). Diverse Applications of Nanomedicine. ACS Nano 11, 2313–2381. doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b06040
Pilapong, C., Siriwongnanon, S., and Keereeta, Y. (2017). Development of Targeted Multimodal Imaging Agent in Ionizing Radiation-free Approach for Visualizing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells. Sensors Actuators B: Chem. 245, 683–694. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2017.02.012
Pu, F., Liu, X., Yang, X., Liu, Z., Ren, J., Wang, S., et al. (2013). Versatile Fluorescent Conjugated Polyelectrolyte-Capped Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Controlled Drug Delivery and Imaging. ChemPlusChem 78, 656–662. doi:10.1002/cplu.201300135
Qin, L., Niu, D., Jiang, Y., He, J., Jia, X., Zhao, W., et al. (2019). Confined Growth of Multiple Gold Nanorices in Dual-Mesoporous Silica Nanospheres for Improved Computed Tomography Imaging and Photothermal Therapy. Ijn 14, 1519–1532. doi:10.2147/IJN.S184192
Quan, B., Choi, K., Kim, Y.-H., Kang, K. W., and Chung, D. S. (2012). Near Infrared Dye Indocyanine green Doped Silica Nanoparticles for Biological Imaging. Talanta 99, 387–393. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2012.05.069
Rosenholm, J. M., Meinander, A., Peuhu, E., Niemi, R., Eriksson, J. E., Sahlgren, C., et al. (2009). Targeting of Porous Hybrid Silica Nanoparticles to Cancer Cells. ACS Nano 3, 197–206. doi:10.1021/nn800781r
Rydahl, C., Thomsen, H. S., and Marckmann, P. (2008). High Prevalence of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis in Chronic Renal Failure Patients Exposed to Gadodiamide, a Gadolinium-Containing Magnetic Resonance Contrast Agent. Invest. Radiol. 43, 141–144. doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e31815a3407
Sailor, M. J., and Park, J.-H. (2012). Hybrid Nanoparticles for Detection and Treatment of Cancer. Adv. Mater. 24, 3779–3802. doi:10.1002/adma.201200653
Saxena, V., Sadoqi, M., and Shao, J. (2003). Degradation Kinetics of Indocyanine green in Aqueous Solution. J. Pharm. Sci. 92, 2090–2097. doi:10.1002/jps.10470
Shi, X., Ma, X., Ren, E., Zhang, Y., Jia, D., Gao, Y., et al. (2019). Tumor-Microenvironment-Activatable Nanoreactor Based on a Polyprodrug for Multimodal-Imaging-Medicated Enhanced Cancer Chemo/Phototherapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 11, 40704–40715. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b16054
Shi, Z., Chu, C., Zhang, Y., Su, Z., Lin, H., Pang, X., et al. (2018). Self-Assembled Metal-Organic Nanoparticles for Multimodal Imaging-Guided Photothermal Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Biomed. Nanotechnol 14, 1934–1943. doi:10.1166/jbn.2018.2636
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Fuchs, H. E., and Jemal, A. (2021). Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA A. Cancer J. Clin. 71, 7–33. doi:10.3322/caac.21654
Sirsi, S. R., and Borden, M. A. (2009). Microbubble Compositions, Properties and Biomedical Applications. Bubble Sci. Eng. Technology 1, 3–17. doi:10.1179/175889709X446507
Slowing, , Viveroescoto, J., Wu, C., and Lin, V. (2008). Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as Controlled Release Drug Delivery and Gene Transfection Carriers☆. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60, 1278–1288. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.012
Slowing, , Wu, C.-W., Vivero-Escoto, J. L., and Lin, V. S.-Y. (2009). Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Reducing Hemolytic Activity towards Mammalian Red Blood Cells. Small 5, 57–62. doi:10.1002/smll.200800926
Slowing, I. I., Trewyn, B. G., Giri, S., and Lin, V. S.-Y. (2007). Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery and Biosensing Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 17, 1225–1236. doi:10.1002/adfm.200601191
Slowing, I., Trewyn, B. G., and Lin, V. S.-Y. (2006). Effect of Surface Functionalization of MCM-41-type Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles on the Endocytosis by Human Cancer Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 14792–14793. doi:10.1021/ja0645943
Song, X.-R., Wang, X., Yu, S.-X., Cao, J., Li, S.-H., Li, J., et al. (2015). Co9Se8Nanoplates as a New Theranostic Platform for Photoacoustic/Magnetic Resonance Dual-Modal-Imaging-Guided Chemo-Photothermal Combination Therapy. Adv. Mater. 27, 3285–3291. doi:10.1002/adma.201405634
Souris, J. S., Lee, C.-H., Cheng, S.-H., Chen, C.-T., Yang, C.-S., Ho, J.-a. A., et al. (2010). Surface Charge-Mediated Rapid Hepatobiliary Excretion of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. Biomaterials 31, 5564–5574. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.048
Stöber, W., Fink, A., and Bohn, E. (1968). Controlled Growth of Monodisperse Silica Spheres in the Micron Size Range. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 26, 62–69. doi:10.1016/0021-9797(68)90272-5
Sun, Q., You, Q., Wang, J., Liu, L., Wang, Y., Song, Y., et al. (2018). Theranostic Nanoplatform: Triple-Modal Imaging-Guided Synergistic Cancer Therapy Based on Liposome-Conjugated Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 10, 1963–1975. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b13651
Sun, W., Shi, T., Luo, L., Chen, X., Lv, P., Lv, Y., et al. (2019). Monodisperse and Uniform Mesoporous Silicate Nanosensitizers Achieve Low‐Dose X‐Ray‐Induced Deep‐Penetrating Photodynamic Therapy. Adv. Mater. 31, 1808024. doi:10.1002/adma.201808024
Tan, H., Wang, M., Yang, C.-T., Pant, S., Bhakoo, K. K., Wong, S. Y., et al. (2011). Silica Nanocapsules of Fluorescent Conjugated Polymers and Superparamagnetic Nanocrystals for Dual-Mode Cellular Imaging. Chem. Eur. J. 17, 6696–6706. doi:10.1002/chem.201003632
Tang, F., Li, L., and Chen, D. (2012). Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Biocompatibility and Drug Delivery. Adv. Mater. 24, 1504–1534. doi:10.1002/adma.201104763
Tarn, D., Ashley, C. E., Xue, M., Carnes, E. C., Zink, J. I., and Brinker, C. J. (2013). Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle Nanocarriers: Biofunctionality and Biocompatibility. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 792–801. doi:10.1021/ar3000986
Taylor, K. M. L., Kim, J. S., Rieter, W. J., An, H., Lin, W., and Lin, W. (2008).Mesoporous Silica Nanospheres as Highly Efficient MRI Contrast Agents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 2154, 2155. doi:10.1021/ja710193c
Tian, Y., Jiang, X., Chen, X., Shao, Z., and Yang, W. (2014). Doxorubicin-loaded Magnetic Silk Fibroin Nanoparticles for Targeted Therapy of Multidrug-Resistant Cancer. Adv. Mater. 26, 7393–7398. doi:10.1002/adma.201403562
Trewyn, B. G., Nieweg, J. A., Zhao, Y., and Lin, V. S.-Y. (2008). Biocompatible Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles with Different Morphologies for Animal Cell Membrane Penetration. Chem. Eng. J. 137, 23–29. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2007.09.045
Trewyn, B. G., Slowing, I. I., Giri, S., Chen, H.-T., and Lin, V. S.-Y. (2007). Synthesis and Functionalization of a Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle Based on the Sol-Gel Process and Applications in Controlled Release. Acc. Chem. Res. 40, 846–853. doi:10.1021/ar600032u
Vallet-Regí, M., Balas, F., and Arcos, D. (2007). Mesoporous Materials for Drug Delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 7548–7558. doi:10.1002/anie.200604488
Villanueva, A. (2019). Hepatocellular Carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 380, 1450–1462. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1713263
Vivero-Escoto, J. L., Slowing, , Trewyn, B. G., and Lin, V. S.-Y. (2010). Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Intracellular Controlled Drug Delivery. Small 6, 1952–1967. doi:10.1002/smll.200901789
Vivero-Escoto, J. L., Taylor-Pashow, K. M. L., Huxford, R. C., Della Rocca, J., Okoruwa, C., An, H., et al. (2011). Multifunctional Mesoporous Silica Nanospheres with Cleavable Gd(III) Chelates as MRI Contrast Agents: Synthesis, Characterization, Target-Specificity, and Renal Clearance. Small 7, 3519–3528. doi:10.1002/smll.201100521
Wan, Y., and Zhao, D. (2007). On the Controllable Soft-Templating Approach to Mesoporous Silicates. Chem. Rev. 107, 2821–2860. doi:10.1021/cr068020s
Wang, C., Lin, G., Luan, Y., Ding, J., Li, P.-c., Zhao, Z., et al. (2019a). HIF-prolyl Hydroxylase 2 Silencing Using siRNA Delivered by MRI-Visible Nanoparticles Improves Therapy Efficacy of Transplanted EPCs for Ischemic Stroke. Biomaterials 197, 229–243. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.05.053
Wang, J., Xu, M., Wang, K., and Chen, Z. (2019b). Stable Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Incorporated with MoS2 and AIE for Targeted Fluorescence Imaging and Photothermal Therapy of Cancer Cells. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 174, 324–332. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.11.030
Wang, X., Chen, H., Zheng, Y., Ma, M., Chen, Y., Zhang, K., et al. (2013). Au-nanoparticle Coated Mesoporous Silica Nanocapsule-Based Multifunctional Platform for Ultrasound Mediated Imaging, Cytoclasis and Tumor Ablation. Biomaterials 34, 2057–2068. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.044
Wang, Y., Yang, T., Ke, H., Zhu, A., Wang, Y., Wang, J., et al. (2015). Smart Albumin-Biomineralized Nanocomposites for Multimodal Imaging and Photothermal Tumor Ablation. Adv. Mater. 27, 3874–3882. doi:10.1002/adma.201500229
Wang, Z., Chang, Z., Lu, M., Shao, D., Yue, J., Yang, D., et al. (2018). Shape-controlled Magnetic Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Magnetically-Mediated Suicide Gene Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Biomaterials 154, 147–157. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.047
Wang, Z., Shao, D., Chang, Z., Lu, M., Wang, Y., Yue, J., et al. (2017). Janus Gold Nanoplatform for Synergetic Chemoradiotherapy and Computed Tomography Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ACS Nano 11, 12732–12741. doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b07486
Wu, S.-H., Hung, Y., and Mou, C.-Y. (2011). Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as Nanocarriers. Chem. Commun. 47, 9972–9985. doi:10.1039/c1cc11760b
Wu, S.-H., Mou, C.-Y., and Lin, H.-P. (2013). Synthesis of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 3862–3875. doi:10.1039/c3cs35405a
Xu, C., Yu, M., Noonan, O., Zhang, J., Song, H., Zhang, H., et al. (2015). Core-Cone Structured Monodispersed Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles with Ultra-large Cavity for Protein Delivery. Small 11, 5949–5955. doi:10.1002/smll.201501449
Xuan, M., Wu, Z., Shao, J., Dai, L., Si, T., and He, Q. (2016). Near Infrared Light-Powered Janus Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle Motors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 6492–6497. doi:10.1021/jacs.6b00902
Yanagisawa, T., Shimizu, T., Kuroda, K., and Kato, C. (1990). Trimethylsilyl Derivatives of Alkyltrimethylammonium-Kanemite Complexes and Their Conversion to Microporous SiO2Materials. Bcsj 63, 1535–1537. doi:10.1246/bcsj.63.1535
Yang, H., Liu, H.-s., Hou, W., Gao, J.-x., Duan, Y., Wei, D., et al. (2020). An NIR-Responsive Mesoporous Silica Nanosystem for Synergetic Photothermal-Immunoenhancement Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 251–259. doi:10.1039/c9tb01891c
Ye, J., Fu, G., Yan, X., Liu, J., Wang, X., Cheng, L., et al. (2018). Noninvasive Magnetic Resonance/photoacoustic Imaging for Photothermal Therapy Response Monitoring. Nanoscale 10, 5864–5868. doi:10.1039/C8NR00044A
Yu, L., Chen, Y., Wu, M., Cai, X., Yao, H., Zhang, L., et al. (2016). "Manganese Extraction" Strategy Enables Tumor-Sensitive Biodegradability and Theranostics of Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 9881–9894. doi:10.1021/jacs.6b04299
Yu, T., Malugin, A., and Ghandehari, H. (2011). Impact of Silica Nanoparticle Design on Cellular Toxicity and Hemolytic Activity. Acs Nano 5, 5717–5728. doi:10.1021/nn2013904
Zeng, C., Shang, W., Wang, K., Chi, C., Jia, X., Fang, C., et al. (2016). Intraoperative Identification of Liver Cancer Microfoci Using a Targeted Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probe for Imaging-Guided Surgery. Sci. Rep. 6, 21959. doi:10.1038/srep21959
Zhang, D., Zheng, A., Li, J., Wu, M., Wu, L., Wei, Z., et al. (2017). Smart Cu(II)-aptamer Complexes Based Gold Nanoplatform for Tumor Micro-environment Triggered Programmable Intracellular Prodrug Release, Photodynamic Treatment and Aggregation Induced Photothermal Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Theranostics 7, 164–179. doi:10.7150/thno.17099
Zhang, J., Li, C., Zhang, X., Huo, S., Jin, S., An, F.-F., et al. (2015). In Vivo tumor-targeted Dual-Modal Fluorescence/CT Imaging Using a Nanoprobe Co-loaded with an Aggregation-Induced Emission Dye and Gold Nanoparticles. Biomaterials 42, 103–111. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.053
Zhang, J., Yuan, Z.-F., Wang, Y., Chen, W.-H., Luo, G.-F., Cheng, S.-X., et al. (2013a). Multifunctional Envelope-type Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Tumor-Triggered Targeting Drug Delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 5068–5073. doi:10.1021/ja312004m
Zhang, K., Xu, L.-L., Jiang, J.-G., Calin, N., Lam, K.-F., Zhang, S.-J., et al. (2013b). Facile Large-Scale Synthesis of Monodisperse Mesoporous Silica Nanospheres with Tunable Pore Structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 2427–2430. doi:10.1021/ja3116873
Zhang, L., Zhang, M., Zhou, L., Han, Q., Chen, X., Li, S., et al. (2018). Dual Drug Delivery and Sequential Release by Amphiphilic Janus Nanoparticles for Liver Cancer Theranostics. Biomaterials 181, 113–125. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.060
Zhang, S., Li, J., Lykotrafitis, G., Bao, G., and Suresh, S. (2009). Size-Dependent Endocytosis of Nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 21, 419–424. doi:10.1002/adma.200801393
Zhao, D., Feng, J., Huo, Q., Melosh, N., Fredrickson, G. H., Chmelka, B. F., et al. (1998). Triblock Copolymer Syntheses of Mesoporous Silica with Periodic 50 to 300 Angstrom Pores. Science 279, 548–552. doi:10.1126/science.279.5350.548
Zhao, X., Wang, J., Tao, S., Ye, T., Kong, X., and Ren, L. (2016). In Vivo Bio-distribution and Efficient Tumor Targeting of Gelatin/Silica Nanoparticles for Gene Delivery. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 11, 195. doi:10.1186/s11671-016-1409-6
Zhao, Y., and Jiang, L. (2009). Hollow Micro/Nanomaterials with Multilevel Interior Structures. Adv. Mater. 21, 3621–3638. doi:10.1002/adma.200803645
Zhao, Y., Lin, L.-N., Lu, Y., Gao, H.-L., Chen, S.-F., Yang, P., et al. (2012). Synthesis of Tunable Theranostic Fe3O4@Mesoporous Silica Nanospheres for Biomedical Applications. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 1, 327–331. doi:10.1002/adhm.201200005
Zhou, C., Zhang, L., Sun, T., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Gong, M., et al. (2021). Activatable NIR‐II Plasmonic Nanotheranostics for Efficient Photoacoustic Imaging and Photothermal Cancer Therapy. Adv. Mater. 33, 2006532. doi:10.1002/adma.202006532
Keywords: mesoporous silica nanoparticles, hepatocellular carcinoma, diagnostics, multimodal imaging, biomedical applications
Citation: Peng X, Lin G, Zeng Y, Lei Z and Liu G (2021) Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle-Based Imaging Agents for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9:749381. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.749381
Received: 29 July 2021; Accepted: 04 October 2021;
Published: 16 November 2021.
Edited by:
Xiao Xu, Zhejiang University, ChinaReviewed by:
Fei-Ting Hsu, China Medical University, TaiwanAlessandra Quarta, Italian National Ressearch Council, Italy
Copyright © 2021 Peng, Lin, Zeng, Lei and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Gang Liu, gangliu.cmitm@xmu.edu.cn; Zhao Lei, leizhao@xmu.edu.cn