Advances in Stem Cell Therapies for Rotator Cuff Injuries
Hao-Nan Wang
Xiao Rong
Lu-Ming Yang
Wei-Zhong Hua
Guo-Xin Ni- 1School of Sport Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China
- 2Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- 3Musculoskeletal Sonography and Occupational Performance Lab, Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Rotator cuff injury is a common upper extremity musculoskeletal disease that may lead to persistent pain and functional impairment. Despite the clinical outcomes of the surgical procedures being satisfactory, the repair of the rotator cuff remains problematic, such as through failure of healing, adhesion formation, and fatty infiltration. Stem cells have high proliferation, strong paracrine action, and multiple differentiation potential, which promote tendon remodeling and fibrocartilage formation and increase biomechanical strength. Additionally, stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) can increase collagen synthesis and inhibit inflammation and adhesion formation by carrying regulatory proteins and microRNAs. Therefore, stem cell-based therapy is a promising therapeutic strategy that has great potential for rotator cuff healing. In this review, we summarize the advances of stem cells and stem cell-derived EVs in rotator cuff repair and highlight the underlying mechanism of stem cells and stem cell-derived EVs and biomaterial delivery systems. Future studies need to explore stem cell therapy in combination with cellular factors, gene therapy, and novel biomaterial delivery systems.
1 Introduction
Rotator cuff injury is one of the leading musculoskeletal diseases worldwide and the most common condition that leads to the complaint of shoulder pain (Picavet and Schouten, 2003). It is estimated that the prevalence of shoulder problems in primary care is 2.4% in the UK (Linsell et al., 2006), and 30%–70% of shoulder pain results from rotator cuff diseases (Mitchell et al., 2005). Intrinsic factors contribute to rotator cuff disease, including age, obesity, smoking, diabetes mellitus, genetics, and narrow anatomical subacromial spaces (Titchener et al., 2014). Among these factors, age-related degeneration is considered the main reason for rotator cuff disease, and the prevalence of rotator cuff tears increases with age in the general population. It was found that the prevalence of sonographic full-thickness rotator cuff tears was 10.7% in the 50s, 15.2% in the 60s, 26.5% in the 70s, and 36.6% in the 80s (Minagawa et al., 2013). While the intrinsic risks decrease the structural resilience of rotator cuff, the extrinsic risks, such as occupations and sports activities, cause excessive mechanical loading on it, involving rotator cuff injury (Whittle and Buchbinder, 2015). According to the continuum of the tendon pathology model, mechanical loading plays an important role in pathological changes (Lewis, 2010), and a repeated and biomechanical loading on the rotator cuff tendon increases the risk of rotator cuff injury (Edmonds and Dengerink, 2014). Rotator cuff injuries may start from tendinopathy and progressively develop into partial or complete tendon tears (Lewis, 2010), which typically result in pain, loss of motion, and functional impairment of the shoulder (Craig et al., 2017). Generally, tendinopathy does not cause substantial problems; therefore, patients with tendinopathy are initially recommended for a course of conservative management, such as physiotherapy and analgesia (Seida et al., 2010). In some cases, patients with tendinopathy may have an increased risk of tendon rupture, especially among those in the older population (Yasui et al., 2017). Nevertheless, acute shoulder trauma may cause partial or complete tendon tears, which require surgical treatment to repair the continuity of the structure or surgery to reattach the tendon back to its bony insertion.
A previous systematic review that included 15 studies and 371 patients after rotator cuff injury demonstrated improved clinical outcomes with an earlier time of receiving surgery (Mukovozov et al., 2013). Unfortunately, the clinical outcomes remained after surgery, and the overall failure rate of healing was 43% at 12 months postsurgical repair (Rashid et al., 2017), and even up to 90% in the elderly (Galatz et al., 2004). The rehabilitation process following rotator cuff arthroscopic repair usually lasts for a few months, and athletes take over 6 months to return to sports (Thigpen et al., 2016). Additionally, the formation of scar tissue at the injury site can cause tissue adhesion and joint stiffness, as well as poor mechanical properties, which increase the risk of retear (Thomopoulos et al., 2010). Due to these issues, there has been a growing interest in the past decade in preparing stem cells to enhance rotator cuff repair and regeneration. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the most popular stem cells because of their accessibility to multiple tissues, anti-inflammatory properties, secretion of trophic factors, and differentiation ability into tenocytes to recellularize the regenerating tissue (Lim et al., 2019). In this review, we summarize the advances of stem cells and stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in rotator cuff repair, gene therapy, and their biomaterial delivery systems.
2 Rotator Cuff Structure and Healing
The rotator cuff comprises four muscles, namely, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis, and teres minor muscles, which envelop the shoulder joint and attach closely to the humeral head via their tendons (Escamilla and Andrews, 2009; Oliva et al., 2015). These muscles play a critical role in both movement and dynamic stabilization during the locomotion of the shoulder joint (Lin et al., 2018). The particular anatomy of rotator cuff and lack of blood vessels can lead to injuries that cannot be healed easily or effectively (Hegedus et al., 2010). Rotator cuff injury often involves the entire muscle–tendon–bone complex, of which the tendon and tendon–bone interface are the most frequently injured and concerned sections.
The tendon is a unique form of connective tissue that transmits muscle-contraction force to the skeleton to maintain posture or produce motion. It comprises resident cells and the extracellular matrix (ECM). Tenocytes, the main type of cell located inside collagen fibers, produce collagen I and ECM molecules (Nourissat et al., 2015). There are tendon stem/progenitor cells (TSPCs), also commonly termed tendon-derived stem cells (TDSCs), which are capable of renewing tenocytes through differentiation and proliferation to maintain homeostasis (Bi et al., 2007). The ECM contains multitudinous molecules, including collagen, elastin, proteoglycans, and glycoproteins, which are involved in tendon-specific collagen I. The triple-helical collagen I molecules are assembled into fibrils that, in turn, form fibers, fascicles, and, ultimately, tendons. Of these, the collagen fibrils are considered to be the basis for force transmission (Kannus, 2000).
The tendon–bone unit is a specialized structure called an enthesis, which represents a transition between soft tendinous and hard bony tissue (Yang and Temenoff, 2009; Andarawis-Puri et al., 2015) (Figure 1). Various resident specialized cell types are found in this tissue, including osteoblasts, osteocytes, osteoclasts, fibrochondrocytes, and tenocytes. The enthesis has been divided into four continuous but distinct zones: tendon, non-mineralized fibrocartilage, mineralized fibrocartilage, and bone (Thomopoulos et al., 2010). Zone 1 (tendon area) mainly consists of collagen I fibers together with a small amount of decorin. Zone 2 (non-mineralized fibrocartilage) predominantly contains collagen II and III fibers, as well as small amounts of collagen I, IX, and X–collagen fibers. The decorin and aggregates also exist. In Zone 3 (mineralized fibrocartilage), the fibrocartilage is mineralized and inserted into the subchondral bone layer. Both aggrecan and mineral components are present in the extracellular matrix composition. Zone 4 (bone area) is mainly a bone-like composition that contains collagen I fiber mineralized in osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts. The gradual changes in microstructure allow for mechanical strain, stress distribution, and efficient energy transition (Rossetti et al., 2017; Takahashi et al., 2017).
FIGURE 1. A schematic diagram of the supraspinatus tendon and the structure of the tendon–bone interface. The tendon–bone interface is divided into four continuous but distinct zones: tendon, unmineralized fibrocartilage, mineralized fibrocartilage, and bone.
Following a rotator cuff tear, the injured site undergoes a natural healing process involving three overlapping stages—inflammatory, proliferation, and remodeling (Docheva et al., 2015). In the inflammatory stage, inflammatory cells are attracted to the injury site by pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages and they yield inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-1β (Lin et al., 2004). Additionally, various growth factors are released by cells to promote tissue repair, such as basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (Docheva et al., 2015). The angiogenic factors induce the formation of a neovascular network that handles the blood supply for newly formed fibrous tissue (Fenwick et al., 2002; Hegedus et al., 2010). Meanwhile, the tenocytes are recruited to the wounded site and induced to proliferate. The second stage is characterized by the abundant synthetic activity of the ECM component; predominately collagen III, directed by recruited fibroblasts, which leads to disorganized alignment of the tendon and mechanical weakness. In the remodeling stage, the density of cells and the synthesis of ECM components both decrease. At the same time, collagen III is gradually replaced by collagen I, which induces the ECM of the tendon to become more aligned; meanwhile, tendon stiffness and tensile strength are restored to the pre-injury level (Voleti et al., 2012).
The healing process involves both intrinsic and extrinsic healing processes (Longo et al., 2011). The extrinsic healing process initially occurs, which involves the invasion of extrinsic cells from the surrounding sheath and synovium, resulting in scar tissue formation to substitute for the native enthesis. The formation of scar tissue and the absence of fibrocartilage lead to the secretion of collagen III fibers rather than collagen I fibers. Then, intrinsic healing is activated and simultaneously induces the tenocyte recruitment, proliferation, and secretion of collagen I fibers, which can strengthen the mechanical property of the tendon (Docheva et al., 2015). The scar tissue lacks the gradient of mineral distribution, and the diameter of collagen III fibers is smaller than that of collagen I fibers (Hexter et al., 2017). For this reason, the structure will exhibit weak mechanical properties. Although collagen III fibers can be replaced by collagen I fibers, it usually takes up to 12 months to complete the healing process, which may lead to a higher chance of re-tearing (Lee et al., 2019; Haleem et al., 2021).
3 Stem Cells for Rotator Cuff Injury
3.1 Stem Cell-Based Therapy
The use of MSCs is a promising and outstanding therapeutic efficacy in regenerative medicine. The stem cells have been successfully derived from multiple tissues, including bone marrow, adipose tissue, tendon, umbilical cord blood, bursa, and urine. In this review, we summarize the animal and clinical studies of these stem cells for rotator cuff injuries. The therapeutic effects of MSCs for rotator cuff injuries are summarized in Figure 2.
FIGURE 2. Theraputic effect of MSCs and MSC-EVs for rotator cuff injuries and underlying signaling pathways. RC, rotator cuff; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; EVs, extracellular vesicles; MAKP, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinases; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; SCX, scleraxis; TNMD, tenomodulin; TNC, tenascin C, Sox9, SRY-Box transcription factor 9; Runx2, runt-related transcription factor 2; AMPK, 5′ AMP-activated protein kinase; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa B; MMPs,matrix metalloproteinases; IL, interleukin. ECM, extracellular matrix.
3.1.1 Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) are the first-discovered mesenchymal stem cells, which act as pluripotent cells (Heo et al., 2016) with multilineage differentiation ability (Docheva et al., 2007; Dai et al., 2015; Perucca Orfei et al., 2019) into adipocytes, osteoblasts and chondrocytes, and tenocytes. Therefore, they have been used in various tissue repairs and regeneration procedures. The principal source of BMSCs in rotator cuff injury is autologous cells that can be harvested from the iliac crest and proximal humerus.
Kida et al. (2013) found that drilled holes in the humerus footprint could stimulate autologous BMSCs to infiltrate into the repair site to promote tendon–bone healing by enhancing the ultimate force-to-failure. Exogenous BMSC can be delivered to the repair site by various carriers (Chen P. et al., 2020). The untreated BMSCs increased the early formation of fibrocartilage and collagen orientation as well as biomechanical strength at 2 weeks. The enhancement of fibrocartilage formation is due to the higher chondrogenesis expression, such as SRY-Box Transcription Factor 9 (Sox9), COL2A1, and aggrecan, during tendon–bone healing (Alves de Araújo et al., 2012). However, it seemed that the effect augmented with BMSCs dissipated by 4 weeks (Degen et al., 2016). In contrast, Gulotta et al. (2009) found no differences amounting to new cartilage formation, collagen fiber organization, or biomechanical strength at either two or four weeks. Additionally, bioactive factor-induced BMSCs could achieve better efficiency in promoting tissue regeneration than BMSCs alone. For instance, BMSCs endowed with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) enhanced the production of growth factors, the ability of osteogenic differentiation, and the resistance of cell death in vitro, and they promoted bone formation and the biomechanical property of the newly generated bone in vivo (Han et al., 2019). The therapeutic effects of BMSCs for rotator cuff injuries are summarized in Table 1.
TABLE 1. Summary of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for rotator cuff injuries.
Some clinical studies have investigated the effectiveness of BMSCs for patients with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The procedure of multiple channeling for rotator cuff repair creates holes in the greater tuberosity to promote endogenous BMSCs of the proximal humerus infiltrating into the repair site. A cohort study found no difference between groups that underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with multiple channeling and those without channeling in clinical and structural outcomes at a follow-up of 2 years (Jo et al., 2013). However, another study suggested that patients who accepted the multiple channeling procedures reported a significantly lower retear rate, indicating that BMSCs may improve structural integrity for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (Hernigou et al., 2014). Taniguchi et al. (2015) reported that applying bone marrow stimulation to the footprint during arthroscopic surface-holding (ASH) repair resulted in improved cuff repair integrity based on Sugaya’s classification by postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, particularly in large-massive tears. In a case-control study, the healing rates of BMSC augmented repair and repair only during arthroscopy were 100% and 67%, respectively. Furthermore, the augmentation of BMSCs prevents further tears after a follow-up of 10 years (Hernigou et al., 2014).
3.1.2 Adipose-Derived Stem Cells
In recent years, it has been attractive to use adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) to enhance rotator cuff repair because of their easy acquisition and ability to inhibit osteogenic differentiation by modulating the microenvironment and anti-inflammatory properties (Bunnell et al., 2008; Kokubu et al., 2020). ADSCs are an ideal source of stem cells in regeneration therapy due to their accessibility; they can be isolated in large quantities from subcutaneous adipose tissue (Bunnell et al., 2008) and liposuction aspirates (De Francesco et al., 2015). As undifferentiated stem cells, they have high proliferation rates and potentially differentiate into tenocytes with growth factors and mechanical stress (Dai et al., 2015; Rinella et al., 2018).
In addition, ADSCs have shown similar therapeutic effects to BMSCs in rotator cuff regeneration. It showed that ADSCs mediated acute inflammation with diminished presence of edema and neutrophils but did not improve the biomechanical properties of tendon–bone healing from two to eight weeks after repair in a rat acute rotator cuff repair model (Mora et al., 2014; Barco et al., 2015). Lipner et al. (2015) reported that ADSCs could reverse the dominated fibrovascular scar response in acute tendon–bone healing. Compared to acute rotator cuff injury, chronic rotator cuff injury causes bone loss and reduced structural properties. ADSCs transplanted to the injured site can increase the bone mineral density of the proximal humerus to promote tendon–bone healing in repairs of chronic tears (Kaizawa et al., 2019; Rothrauff et al., 2019; Shin et al., 2020). Additionally, injection of ADSCs into the musculotendinous junction area of the subscapularis can improve muscle function by electromyographic evaluation and decrease fatty infiltration of the muscle, and it tends to enhance the load-to-failure in chronic rotator cuff tears (Oh et al., 2014). The therapeutic effects of ADSCs for rotator cuff injuries are summarized in Table 2.
TABLE 2. Summary of adipose stem cells for rotator cuff injuries.
ADSCs are some of the most commonly used stem cells in clinical research on rotator cuff injuries. The cohort study by Kim et al. (2017) revealed that 182 patients treated with an injection of ADSCs loaded in fibrin glue (4.46 × 106 cells) during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair could significantly improve structural outcomes assessed in terms of the retear rate, and MRI results indicated that the retear rate of the ADSC group was less than that of the control group (14.3% and 28.5%, respectively) at a minimum of 12 months after surgery. However, there were no significant differences in pain intensity, range of motion, or self-reported function at 28 months of follow-up.
For patients with symptomatic partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (sPTRCT), surgery may not be the first-choice therapy; thus, many studies have used ADSC therapy as a regeneration strategy. In a pilot RCT study, patients with sPTRCT who did not respond to physical therapy treatments for at least 6 weeks were randomly assigned to receive a single injection of unmodified, autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells (UA-ADRC) (11.4 × 106 cells) or a single injection of 80 mg of methylprednisolone (40 mg/ml; 2 ml) plus 3 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. The patients in the UA-ADRC group showed significantly higher total scores on the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) at 3 and 12 months post-treatment compared to those in the corticosteroid group. No severe adverse events related to the injection of UA-ADRCs were reported at the 12-month post-treatment follow-up (Hurd et al., 2020). A retrospective comparative study showed that a high-dose (1.0 × 108 cells) intratendinous injection of ADSCs for patients with sPTRCT can improve shoulder function scores and rotator cuff strength for up to 2 years post-treatment. The results of the MRI showed that the bursal-sided defects nearly disappeared at 1 year and did not recur for up to 2 years. Importantly, there were no treatment-related adverse events at a minimum 2-year follow-up (Jo et al., 2020).
3.1.3 Tendon Stem/Progenitor Cells
Progenitor/tendon stem cells (TSPCs), also known as tendon-derived stem cells (TDSCs), were isolated and identified from humans and mice in 2007 (Bi et al., 2007). TSPCs are so named because they can be harvested and isolated from the tendon of the supraspinatus and the long head of the biceps during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair procedures (Tsai et al., 2013; Dei Giudici and Castricini, 2020). Like other MSCs, TPSCs have characteristics of high clonogenicity, self-renewal capacity (Al-Ani et al., 2015), and multi-differentiation potential, including tenocytes, chondrocytes, osteocytes, and adipocytes (Zhang and Wang, 2010; Leonardi et al., 2021). They have highly expressed tendon-related genes, including COL1A1, tenascin C (TNC), Scleraxis (Scx), and Tenomodulin (TNMD), which may contribute to spontaneous tenogenic differentiation (Guo et al., 2016). Therefore, TPSCs are a promising source of tendon regeneration. However, owing to their abundance in the tendon, it is challenging to obtain autologous TSPCs, which could limit their application in clinical studies.
Several studies have investigated the utilization of TPSCs to treat tendon disorders in pre-clinical studies (Song et al., 2018). Shen et al. (2012) used allogenic TSPC-seeded scaffolds to augment rotator cuff repair in a rabbit model. There was no elicited immune response, with decreasing lymphocytic infiltration at early repair and improving histological and biomechanical properties compared to non-TSPC treatment control repairs at 12 weeks post-surgery. Furthermore, it showed that transplanting the cell sheet that was derived from the rotator cuff promoted cartilage regeneration and angiogenesis at the enthesis and upregulated the expression of genes VEGF and COL2A1 at 4 weeks and a greater ultimate failure load at 8 weeks after surgery (Harada et al., 2017).
3.1.4 Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UCB-MSCs) are a promising source of human cells because of their easy availability, high proliferation capacity, and low immunogenicity (Wang et al., 2009; Bai et al., 2016). The advantage of UCB-MSCs is that allogeneic stem cells do not require autologous tissues, such as bone marrow aspiration and adipose tissue (Kasper et al., 2009). Therefore, UCB-MSCs can be prepared early before treatment, and the function of stem cells is not affected by the age of patients or disease. Park et al. (2015) introduced the UCB-MSCs injection under ultrasound guidance to rabbits with acute full-thickness subscapularis tendon tears and revealed that UCB-MSCs promoted the partial regeneration of rotator cuff tendon tears with improved histologic appearance, tendon size, and walking capacity. Then, they investigated the efficacy of UCB-MSCs for chronic full-thickness rotator cuff tendon tears without repair and found that the injection of UCB-MSCs had a similar therapeutic effect in histological examination and motion analysis of walking 4 weeks after treatment (Rak Kwon et al., 2020). However, there was no difference between the high-dose and low-dose (2 × 106 and 1 × 106 cells, respectively) of UCB-MSCs, indicating that the benefits of UCB-MSCs were not in a dose-dependent manner (Kwon et al., 2019). In another study, UCB-MSCs–seeded biomimetic hydroxyapatite-gradient scaffold regenerated the tendon–bone interface of the rotator cuff in a rat repair model in terms of improving collagen organization, cartilage formation, and similar biomechanical properties as the normal tendon–bone interface at 8 weeks (Yea et al., 2020).
3.1.5 Bursa-Derived Cells
Previous studies have suggested that the subacromial bursa is an important source of pluripotent stem cell potency for tendon healing (Utsunomiya et al., 2013; Baldino et al., 2020). Bursa-derived stem cells (B-MSCs) are easily accessible stem cells that can be harvested from routine rotator cuff repair surgery (Baldino et al., 2020). Like other stem cells, B-MSCs demonstrate high proliferation ability and multipotential differentiation in vitro (Utsunomiya et al., 2013). Recently, Muench et al. (2020) proved that B-MSCs consistently exhibited high cellular proliferation regardless of patient demographics (age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, and presence of systemic comorbidities), characteristics of rotator cuff tear (size, tendon retraction, fatty infiltration, and muscle atrophy), and the severity of glenohumeral joint degeneration.
Another study found that B-MSCs isolated from human bursae were characterized by multilineage differentiation, including osteoblastic, adipogenic, chondrogenic, and tenogenic lineages in vitro and in vivo. Additionally, they were induced into the bone, fibrocartilage, and tendon under different environments or pretreatments (Song et al., 2014). Compared with B-MSCs, cells isolated from bursae displayed superior engraftment and survival in tendon tissue and increased the thickness of the healing tissue compared with tissue that did not receive cells (Dyrna et al., 2018). Thus, it is suggested that B-MSCs are potent promising cells in rotator cuff injury; further studies should confirm their therapeutic effect for rotator cuff injury in pre-clinical and clinical studies.
3.1.6 Urine-Derived Stem Cells
Currently, studies pay more attention to stem cells isolated from urine (USCs) due to their robust proliferation ability and multipotential differentiation into osteocytes, chondrocytes, adipocytes, neurocytes, and myocytes (Bharadwaj et al., 2013; Ji et al., 2017). The obvious advantage of USCs is that the harvest method is noninvasive and accessible. As autologous stem cells, USCs exhibit low immunogenicity, which may cause a low rejection response during treatment. Therefore, USCs are considered an attractive source of stem cells for rotator cuff healing. Chen Y. et al. (2020) implanted an autogenous, TGF-β3-induced USC sheet to the injured site of rotator cuff repair, evident by increased bone volume and trabecular thickness, which yielded enthesis-like tissue with more proteoglycan and collagen, as well as higher failure load and stiffness in comparison to the control group only at 12 weeks post repair. Nevertheless, more studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of untreated USCs on both acute and chronic rotator cuff injuries to offer a better research basis for future clinical transplantation.
3.2 Extracellular Vesicle-Based Therapy
MSCs are thought to mediate therapeutic functions in a paracrine manner in addition to their multipotent differentiation capacity and direct intercellular interactions. In the example of a rotator cuff injury model, conditioned medium (CM) of human bone marrow-derived stem cells promotes rotator cuff healing by increasing histologic score, bone mineral density and biomechanical tensile after surgery (Reiner et al., 2017; He et al., 2021). To search for the therapeutically active components, Bruno and colleagues successfully fractioned CM of MSCs by ultracentrifugation and discovered the therapeutic vesicular structures (Bruno et al., 2009). Collectively, these nano-sized particles with a lipid bilayer, naturally released by cells, are called extracellular vesicles (EVs) (Théry et al., 2018). They can be categorized into exosomes, microvesicles, and apoptotic bodies according to their cellular origins. Exosomes are the smallest vesicle types (40–120 nm), and they originate from the inward budding of late multivesicular endosomes (MVEs) and are released upon fusion of MVEs with the plasma membrane. Meanwhile, microvesicles are formed by budding from the plasma membrane, and their size can vary from 50 nm to 1 μm. Unlike exosomes and microvesicles, which are released by all cells, apoptotic bodies are vesicles (50 nm–5 μm) produced by cells undergoing apoptosis. EVs have become an attractive approach in regenerative medicine because they exert biological activities like those of stem cells and overcome the shortages of cell-based therapy, such as cell expansion, low survival rate, and potential immunological rejection (Keshtkar et al., 2018; Woo et al., 2020). It is believed that MSCs cultured in chemically defined serum-free media may be more suitable for the manufacture of EVs. The methods of separation and concentration may vary depending on the size of EVs and the purpose of end-use. According to a worldwide ISEV survey in 2015, ultracentrifugation was the most widely used primary EV separation and concentration technique (Gardiner et al., 2016). A variety of techniques have also been developed to achieve better specificity of separation, such as density gradients and size-exclusion chromatography (Théry et al., 2018). However, there are currently no accepted metrics for assessing the purity or degree of purity in EV preparation (Reiner et al., 2017). Although the mechanism of EVs is not fully understood, it is believed that EVs secreted by stem cells can promote tissue repair and regeneration by inducing the proliferation of cells, promoting angiogenesis, modulating the inflammation process, and affecting cell apoptosis (He et al., 2021). The therapeutic effects of MSC-EVs for rotator cuff injuries are summarized in Figure 2 and Table 3.
TABLE 3. Summary of extracellular vesicles from mesenchymal stem cells for the repair of rotary cuff injuries.
Notably, the most important impact of EVs on tissue regeneration is their immunomodulatory properties at both humoral and cellular levels. They can reduce injury-induced inflammation by dampening but not inhibiting complement activation through CD59, and they involve the promotion of anti-inflammatory and pro-regenerative (M2) macrophages over pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages and concomitantly enhance the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 instead of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and TNF-α (Toh et al., 2018). Additionally, EVs contain a large amount of biological information, including biologically mRNAs, miRNAs, and lncRNAs, which are important for modulating the signaling of the endogenous and exogenous cells of the injured site (Forsberg et al., 2020). Because of this advantage, engineered EVs are also regarded as candidate cargo to realize gene therapy for injuries. Additionally, the different resources of human MSC-derived EVs can exhibit distinct characteristics that reveal their potential applications in different fields. Bone marrow MSC-derived EVs have shown superior regeneration ability, and adipose tissue MSC-derived EVs have played a significant role in immune regulation, whereas umbilical cord MSC-derived EVs are prominent in tissue damage repair (He et al., 2021).
BMSC-derived EVs (BMSC-EVs) are widely used in the musculoskeletal regeneration field. Recently, one study solely injected BMSC-EVs into the vein to promote rotator cuff repair (Huang et al., 2020). The results showed that BMSC-EVs promoted angiogenesis around the tendon–bone interface, histologic histological appearance, and biomechanical strength, and they inhibited the secretion of pro-inflammatory factors in rat rotator cuff reconstruction. They believed that the mechanism by which BMSC-EVs achieve the healing process may be through the proliferation, migration, and angiogenic tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) by regulating the angiogenic signaling pathway, inhibiting the polarization of M1 macrophages, and also inhibiting the secretion of pro-inflammatory factors by M1 macrophages (Huang et al., 2020). A previous study reported BMSC-EVs can also suppress inflammation by increasing the expression of anti-inflammatory mediators IL-10 and IL-4 at an early phase of healing (Shi et al., 2019). Moreover, local delivery of BMSC-EVs can promote tendon regeneration by facilitating the proliferation, migration, and tenogenesis differentiation of endogenous TPSCs (Shi et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2020).
ADSC-derived EVs (ADSC-EVs) have regeneration and immunomodulation capacities (Chen et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021). To investigate the effect of ADSC-EVs on chronic rotator cuff tears, Wang C. et al. (2020) established a bilateral rotator cuff chronic tear model and injected isolated ADSC-EVs at the injury site of the supraspinatus muscle at the time of repair. This demonstrated that the local injection of ADSC-EVs inhibited fatty infiltration, regenerated fibrocartilage, and increased biomechanical strength. Similarly, Fu et al. (2021) reported that rotator cuff injected with ADSC-EV-loaded hydrogel exhibited aligned collagen fiber and muscle bundles and enhanced mechanical properties. A variety of mechanisms may contribute to ADSC-EVs in rotator cuff repair. TPSCs regulate the proliferation, migration, and tenogenic differentiation of TPSCs. Studies have reported that ADSC-EVs can upregulate the expression of the tenogenesis genes TNMD, TNC, and Scx in vivo (Liu H. et al., 2021; Fu et al., 2021). Smad signaling pathways play vital roles in regulating stem cell activity. This effect may be related to activated SMAD2/3 and SMAD1/5/9 signaling pathways, which play vital roles in regulating stem cell activity (Liu H. et al., 2021). In addition, ADSC-EVs regulate the early inflammatory response in rotator cuff healing by decreasing the M1 macrophage, enhancing the M2 macrophage, and reducing the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and MMP-9 (Liu H. et al., 2021). In a human supraspinatus explant experiment, ADSC-EVs maintained homeostasis of the impaired tendon by increasing expression of COL1A1, COL3A1, and an elevated type I/III ratio and by decreasing expression of MMP-9 and MMP-13 (Zhang et al., 2021). The underlying mechanism might be enhancing AMPK signaling to suppress Wnt/β-catenin activity or NF-κB pathway (Ma et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2021).
Few research observations of TPSC-derived EVs (TPSC-EVs) exist on rotator cuff repair. Recently, a study reported that TPSC-EVs suppressed inflammation and apoptosis at 1 week after surgery; the tendon exhibited a more continuous and regular arrangement and a larger collagen fiber diameter in the TPSC-EV-treated group compared to the non-TPSC-EV-treated group at two and eight weeks after surgery (Zhang et al., 2020a). The augment of TPSC-EVs can be partially explained by promoting the proliferation and migration of tenocytes in a dose-dependent manner in an in vitro study, which was related to the activation of the PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK1/2 signaling pathways (Zhang et al., 2020a). Nevertheless, the detailed mechanism of TPSC-EVs is still poorly understood and needs further investigation.
Many studies have reported the potential of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived EVs (HUMSC-EVs) in tendon repair. Kim et al. (2022) demonstrated that the HUMSC-EVs laden injectable collagen could effectively promote bone-to-tendon healing via collagen maturation in the bone–tendon interface and prevent fatty degeneration of the rotator muscle at 4 weeks after rotator cuff repair. In a rat Achilles tendon injury model, treatment with HUMSC-EVs improved the histological structure, enhanced tendon-specific matrix components, and optimized biomechanical properties of the Achilles tendon, which was related to the overexpression of miR-29a-3p regulated by PTEN/mTOR/TGF-β1 signaling (Yao et al., 2021).
3.3 Gene Therapy
An increasing number of studies have utilized gene therapy to enhance and expand the therapeutic effectiveness of stem cells in tendon repair. In comparison to conventional stem cell therapy, modified stem cells or their EVs yield more production of a gene in the local injured site, with greater biological activity and lower immune response. There are two main methods of transferring the gene to target cells: viral and non-viral vector methods. Viral vectors have been widely used in gene therapy due to their high efficiency in gene delivery into the cells they infect. Commonly, recombinant viruses include adenovirus, lentivirus, retrovirus, and adeno-associated virus in tendon repair. However, the use of viral vectors may also meet the challenges of high-cost expenses and safety issues. Thus, non-viral vectors, such as plasmids, increase the interest of researchers in gene delivery because of their safety, simple manufacture, and lower immunogenicity.
Concerning rotator cuff regeneration, many studies have focused on facilitating the tenogenic differentiation of stem cells to promote rotator cuff repair. Gulotta et al. (2011a) showed that BMSCs transfected to overexpress Scx promoted the formation of fibrocartilage at the tendon insertion and improved biomechanical strength at 4 weeks for rats who underwent unilateral detachment and repair of the supraspinatus tendon. Owing to the tear of enthesis (Zones 3 and 4) in rotator cuff injuries, it was meaningful to transfer osteogenic and chondrogenic genes to enhance tendon–bone healing. It was demonstrated that, when transfected to overexpress developmental genes, membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP), which is thought to direct the process of ossification, promotes the formation of fibrocartilage at the tendon insertion and improves biomechanical strength (Gulotta et al., 2010). However, ADSC transduced with the osteogenic factor bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) led to impaired healing by losing bone mass and decreasing biomechanical properties (Lipner et al., 2015).
In terms of chondrogenic genes, the genetically modified BMSCs with overexpressing BMP-13 showed no improvement in either biomechanical parameters or histological appearance in acute rotator cuff repair (Gulotta et al., 2011b). Additionally, gene-modified stem cells can inhibit inflammation during the healing process. Cheng et al. (2014) discovered that the silent TNF-α stimulated gene/protein 6 (TSG-6) of TPSCs reduced biomechanical strength, indicating that TPSCs might promote rotator cuff healing through regulating anti-inflammatory response by TSG-6 signaling. Schnabel et al. (2009) explored using the insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-1) gene enhanced BMSCs significantly improved tendon histological scores and reduced ECM degradation in collagenase-induced bilateral tendinitis lesions, but the benefit of IGF-1 gene enhancement was not obvious compared to untreated BMSCs.
EVs contain miRNAs from donor cells that can be transferred to recipient cells, thereby promoting the expression of specific proteins. Therefore, an increasing number of studies pay attention to utilizing engineered EVs to transfer genes in musculoskeletal disorders such as osteoporosis (Yang et al., 2020) and osteoarthritis (Tao et al., 2017). Several studies have demonstrated the promising results of engineered EVs in tendon repair and regeneration. Early tendon remodeling plays a vital role in tendon regeneration. Yao et al. (2021) revealed that miRNA-29a-3p loaded HUMSC-EVs reduced the area of the lesion and improved histological scores in a tendinopathy model. The underlying pathway was reducing transcript levels of collagen III via the PTEN/mTOR/TGF-β1 signaling pathway (Millar et al., 2015; Watts et al., 2017).
Another strategy of gene therapy for tendon healing is to inhibit the fibrous process of the tendon and surrounding tissues. The EVs derived from antagonists targeting miR-21a-3p treatment of HUMSC, which expressed low levels of miR-21a-3p, expanded the inhibition of tendon adhesion by manipulating p65 activity, suggesting that delivering low-abundance miR-21a-3p may inhibit tendon adhesion. Furthermore, some miRNAs participate in tenogenic differentiation and prevent chondro-osteogenic differentiation, including miR-124, miR-135a, miR-140, and miR-337-3p (Chen et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2016; Geng et al., 2020; Liu Y. J. et al., 2021). However, the effectiveness of the delivery of these genes by EVs has not been confirmed.
4 Biomaterials
Innovation in the field of biomaterials has driven the development of regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. Biomaterials are bioresorbable and gradually degraded so that tissues have sufficient space for regeneration as well as negligible immunogenicity and side effects locally and systematically (Garg et al., 2012). In rotator cuff repair, biomaterials used for stem cell or EV delivery can be divided into two categories: implantable and injectable delivery systems (Chen et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2020). Commonly, an implantable delivery system is composed of tissue engineering scaffold biomaterials, which should have a three-dimensional structure that allows for cell attachment, growth, and proliferation. In addition, biomaterials used for injectable delivery systems are supposed to carry bioactive factors and cells to the target injury site while minimizing the spread of drugs. Injectable deliveries have the advantage of a minimally invasive nature, but they cannot provide sufficient support for cells and impaired tissues. The delivery system in rotator cuff repair includes, decellularized tissues, electrospun nanofiber scaffolds, hydrogels, and patterned scaffolds, but is not limited to these (Longo et al., 2012; Saveh-Shemshaki, 2019).
4.1 Biomaterial Polymers
To date, various natural and synthetic materials have been developed to promote stem cells in rotator cuff repair and regeneration. In our review, natural polymers are most widely used in stem cell therapies for rotator cuff injuries (Gulotta et al., 2010; Gulotta et al., 2011a; Degen et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2019). They have the advantages of non-toxicity, biocompatibility, and biodegradation, as well as cell proliferation and cell adhesion. Nevertheless, it is difficult to modify their physical and chemical properties, which remains a potential immunogenicity problem (Garg et al., 2012). Commonly used natural materials include ECM-derived biomaterials, hyaluronic acid (HA), chondroitin sulfate (CS), and fibrin. As the main component of the ECM, ECM-based biomaterials provide a biomimetic environment suited for tissue remodeling. For instance, Liu et al. (2019) reported a novel biomaterial that uses engineered tendon–fibrocartilage–bone composite (TFBC) augmentation with BMSCs to form a “sandwich” structure that can enhance rotator cuff healing in terms of anatomic structure, collagen organization, and biomechanical strength. Decellularized matrices have been explored for their regenerative effects on tendon repair; however, tissue resources should be considered. While the tendon-derived decellularized matrix promoted the tendinous phenotype in TSPCs and inhibited their osteogenesis, the dermal skin-derived collagen matrix had no apparent effect on TSPC differentiation (Yin et al., 2013). Hyaluronic acid (HA) is an anionic, non-sulfated glycosaminoglycan that is distributed in the intercellular matrix of most connective tissues. It has been reported that HA decreases the cell proliferation and expression level of procollagen α1 (III) mRNA of tendon-derived fibroblasts (Yamada et al., 2007). Moreover, CS is a natural polymer and a major ECM component that has the ability to reduce inflammation by diminishing NF-κB activation and nuclear translocation (Vallières and Du Souich, 2010). Human mesenchymal stem cells cultured within the decellularized amniotic matrix wrapped around the collagen-chondroitin sulfate scaffold could maintain metabolic activity and down-regulate the pro-inflammatory cytokines (Hortensius et al., 2018). Fibrin is formed following the cleavage of fibrinogen and thrombin and can be processed into hydrogels or fibrous scaffolds. Tissue-engineered construction based on fibrin hydrogel has better extracellular matrix organization and biomechanical properties compared to collagen-based hydrogels (Breidenbach et al., 2015; Thangarajah et al., 2018).
Synthetic materials are also used extensively in tendon regeneration since their molecular weight, hydrophobicity, and degradation speed can be easily modified, and due to their low cost of fabrication (Ruiz-Alonso et al., 2021). Notably, it is possible to achieve similar mechanical properties with tendon tissue and good structural integrity, which are important in the regeneration of tendon repair (Pina et al., 2019). Compared to natural biomaterials, synthetic materials have a low risk of disease transmission because they are not obtained from biological organisms or tissues. For this reason, they have a high risk of immune response (Won et al., 2014). Since synthetic materials are hydrophobic in nature, they may also cause poor cell adherence, low proliferation rates, and altered phenotypes of stem cells (Theisen et al., 2010). Numerous synthetic materials are used for tendon tissue repairs, such as poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL), poly (lactic acid) (PLA), poly (glycolic acid) (PGA), poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG), and poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA). These synthetic polymers can be electrospun into nano- and microfibrous scaffolds, which mimic aligned collagen fibers in tendon tissue and promote tenogenic differentiation (Vuornos et al., 2016; Laranjeira et al., 2017; Calejo et al., 2019; El Khatib et al., 2020). The rate of degradation determines its usage. For example, polymers with a low degradation rate, such as PCL, are suitable for building longer-term tendon scaffolds (Laranjeira et al., 2017; Calejo et al., 2019), while polymers with faster degradation rates are less suitable since they may increase the inflammation response, including PLA, PGA, and PLGA (Yokoya et al., 2008; Vuornos et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2019; Chen P. et al., 2020; Araque-Monrós et al., 2020; El Khatib et al., 2020). According to this characteristic, a PEG-based hydrogel system with a range of degradation rates can control the timing of MSC delivery to the target site of tendinopathy (Qiu et al., 2011).
4.2 Interactions Between Biomaterials and Stem Cells
The topographical and mechanical properties of biomaterials impact the proliferation and tenogenic differentiation of stem cells, including fiber diameter, pore size, alignment, surface roughness, and matrix stiffness. Fiber with a large diameter promotes the expression of tenogenic genes, such as Scx, in stem cells. This suggests that large-diameter fibers (e.g., >2 μm) may be more suitable for MSC differentiation into tendon lineage than small-diameter fibers (Cardwell et al., 2014). Generally, the pore size of the scaffold plays an important role in migration ability (Zheng et al., 2017); a larger pore size of PLGA scaffolds significantly enhances the migration of BMSCs in vitro (Dai et al., 2018). Fiber alignment provides tissue-specific biomechanical cues to resident cells in the native tendon. Studies have indicated that scaffolds with aligned fibers enhance cell infiltration, ECM deposition, collagen alignment, and tendon-related gene expression of stem cells when compared to nonaligned fibers (Orr et al., 2015; Zheng et al., 2017). In the massive rotator cuff repair model, scaffolds with aligned fibers exhibit more conspicuous native microstructures, better alignment, and better mechanical properties at 12 weeks post-implantation (Zheng et al., 2017). Due to the mechanical microenvironment of the tendon, matrix stiffness impacts stem cells during tendon repair. The proliferation of TPSCs increases and more stress fibers form with increasing matrix stiffness. Furthermore, the differentiation of TPSCs into tenogenic lineages is inhibited on stiff hydrogel with reduced expression of tendon-specific genes THBS4, TNMD, and SCX by regulating FAK and ERK1/2 pathways (Liu et al., 2018).
Concerning rotator cuff repair, the scaffold is an effective tool for transmitting mechanical stimulation to delivered cells; thus, the mechanical environment provided by biomaterials should be considered in cell delivery. The mechanical stimulation of stem cells is vital in tendon tissue repair and has been shown to influence the differentiation and proliferation of stem cells (Wang H.-N. et al., 2020). The magnitude of stretching could lead to different cell fates. Studies indicated that 4% stretching promoted the differentiation of TPSCs into tenocytes with increased gene expression of COL1A1; 8% stretching, however, promoted the differentiation of TPSCs into non-tenocytes, including adipocytes, chondrocytes, and osteocytes, aside from differentiation into tenocytes, as evidenced by higher expression levels of genes such as PPARγ, COL2A1, Sox9, and Runx2 in vitro (Wang H.-N. et al., 2020).
Furthermore, mechanical stimulation of BMSCs significantly increased the expression of tenogenic genes and anti-inflammatory cytokines (Ciardulli et al., 2020). In addition, biomaterials containing magnetic elements have been developed to mechanically stimulate stem cells in tendon regeneration. Human adipose stem cells cultured on the magneto-mechanical actuation scaffold increased the expression of tendon-related genes Scx and Tnmd when compared to static culture and steered the mechanosensitive YAP/TAZ signaling pathway. This magneto-mechanical stimulation also modulated the inflammation response by upregulating the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-4 and IL-10 while reducing the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines COX-2 and IL-6 (Tomás et al., 2019).
4.3 Responsive Biomaterial Strategies for Rotator Cuff Injury
To achieve the different requirements of delivery, “smart” delivery systems, such as stimulation-responsive hydrogel, can provide possibilities for precise treatment for different stages of healing (Bawa et al., 2009; Yun et al., 2015). These hydrogels respond to visible or UV light and release drugs for tissue regeneration. A gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel loaded with TPSC-EVs was placed in the Achilles tendon defect to promote tendon healing. By using a 405 nm blue light source at a distance, the carrier is converted to the gel state by irradiation for 10–20 s. After delivering TPSC-EVs, tendon repair is promoted by suppressing inflammation and apoptosis and regulating ECM balance (Zhang et al., 2020b). Additionally, matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) is a valuable endogenous trigger for responsive release systems, achieving localized and on-demand drug delivery. MMP-2 is a member of the zinc endopeptidase family and has the ability to cleave ECM components, which is upregulated in the peritendinous area where the adhesion tissue forms after tendon injury. Cai et al. (2021) have designed an innovative anti-adhesion electrospun nanofiber scaffold system for the on-demand and unidirectional release of polyplexes to inhibit fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition by gene therapy. The MMP-2 degradable hydrogel is fabricated by crosslinking allyl glycidyl ether (AGE) modified carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCS-AGE) and the MMP-2 substrate peptide CPLGLAGC (MMP-2 sp).
5 Discussion
Rotator cuff injuries cause persistent symptoms, and they greatly impair movement ability and quality of life. Currently, the clinical options of surgery and conventional therapies for treating rotator injuries are unsatisfactory. Due to the special structures of the rotator cuff, several clinical problems have not been solved, such as the delayed healing process, poor biomechanical strength of newly formed tissue, and scar adhesion. Therefore, stem cell therapies are attractive because they activate the self-potential of the body to repair injured tissues. According to present pre-clinical and clinical studies, several stem cells have been successfully isolated and have shown promising potential in rotator cuff repair due to their strong capacity for regeneration, tenogenic differentiation, and paracrine activity. As a primary effector in stem cell therapy, EVs can promote the healing process by reducing inflammation and fatty infiltration, stimulating cell proliferation and tenogenic differentiation, and maintaining homeostasis. Moreover, gene therapy and biomaterials expand the effectiveness of the application of stem cell therapy by regulating the environment, stimulating directional differentiation, and ensuring high efficacy of delivery. Therefore, stem cell therapy is a promising strategy for rotator cuff repair.
Nevertheless, numerous issues still need to be investigated in future studies. Although more stem cells and their EVs, such as Bursa-derived cells, have been successfully discovered and isolated, the lack of pre-clinical and clinical studies limits their further application. Moreover, with the deepening research of gene therapy, the efficient, safe, and targeted gene vector and therapeutic genes need to be addressed and verified in large animal models before beginning clinical trials. Innovation in biomaterials is evolving rapidly; thus, the translation of safe and valid carriers is the key to advancing the clinical application of stem cell therapy. Finally, to fully understand the safety, effectiveness, and mechanism of stem cell therapy, basic clinical research is still required.
Author Contributions
H-NW, XR, and G-XN drafted the manuscript. L-MY and W-ZH searched for some manuscripts and figures and contributed to the final version of the manuscript. H-NW and G-XN supervised the whole project and reviewed the manuscript. All authors discussed and provided ideas to publish the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81871848) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (20211002, 20211003, 20212070, 20212071, and 2012072).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Al-Ani, M. K., Xu, K., Sun, Y., Pan, L., Xu, Z., and Yang, L. (2015). Study of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal and Tendon-Derived Stem Cells Transplantation on the Regenerating Effect of Achilles Tendon Ruptures in Rats. Stem Cells Int. 2015, 984146. doi:10.1155/2015/984146
Alves de Araújo, M. E., Bezerra da Silva, E., Bragade Mello, D., Cader, S. A., Shiguemi Inoue Salgado, A., and Dantas, E. H. M. (2012). The Effectiveness of the Pilates Method: Reducing the Degree of Non-Structural Scoliosis, and Improving Flexibility and Pain in Female College Students. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 16 (2), 191–198. doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2011.04.002
Andarawis-Puri, N., Flatow, E. L., and Soslowsky, L. J. (2015). Tendon Basic Science: Development, Repair, Regeneration, and Healing. J. Orthop. Res. 33 (6), 780–784. doi:10.1002/jor.22869
Araque-Monrós, M. C., García-Cruz, D. M., Escobar-Ivirico, J. L., Gil-Santos, L., Monleón-Pradas, M., and Más-Estellés, J. (2020). Regenerative and Resorbable PLA/HA Hybrid Construct for Tendon/Ligament Tissue Engineering. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 48 (2), 757–767. doi:10.1007/s10439-019-02403-0
Bai, L., Li, D., Li, J., Luo, Z., Yu, S., Cao, S., et al. (2016). Bioactive Molecules Derived from Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Acta Histochem. 118 (8), 761–769. doi:10.1016/j.acthis.2016.09.006
Baldino, J. B., Muench, L. N., Kia, C., Johnson, J., Morikawa, D., Tamburini, L., et al. (2020). Intraoperative and In Vitro Classification of Subacromial Bursal Tissue. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. 36 (8), 2057–2068. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2020.03.039
Barco, R., Encinas, C., Valencia, M., Carrascal, M. T., García-Arranz, M., and Antuña, S. (2015). Use of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in an Experimental Rotator Cuff Fracture Animal Model. Rev. Española Cirugía Ortopédica Traumatol. (English Edition) 59 (1), 3–8. doi:10.1016/j.recote.2014.11.003
Bawa, P., Pillay, V., Choonara, Y. E., and du Toit, L. C. (2009). Stimuli-Responsive Polymers and Their Applications in Drug Delivery. Biomed. Mat. 4 (2), 022001. doi:10.1088/1748-6041/4/2/022001
Bharadwaj, S., Liu, G., Shi, Y., Wu, R., Yang, B., He, T., et al. (2013). Multipotential Differentiation of Human Urine-Derived Stem Cells: Potential for Therapeutic Applications in Urology. Stem Cells (Dayton, Ohio) 31 (9), 1840–1856. doi:10.1002/stem.1424
Bi, Y., Ehirchiou, D., Kilts, T. M., Inkson, C. A., Embree, M. C., Sonoyama, W., et al. (2007). Identification of Tendon Stem/Progenitor Cells and the Role of the Extracellular Matrix in Their Niche. Nat. Med. 13 (10), 1219–1227. doi:10.1038/nm1630
Breidenbach, A. P., Dyment, N. A., Lu, Y., Rao, M., Shearn, J. T., Rowe, D. W., et al. (2015). Fibrin Gels Exhibit Improved Biological, Structural, and Mechanical Properties Compared with Collagen Gels in Cell-Based Tendon Tissue-Engineered Constructs. Tissue Eng. Part A 21 (3-4), 438–450. doi:10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0768
Bruno, S., Grange, C., Deregibus, M. C., Calogero, R. A., Saviozzi, S., Collino, F., et al. (2009). Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Microvesicles Protect against Acute Tubular Injury. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN 20 (5), 1053–1067. doi:10.1681/asn.2008070798
Bunnell, B., Flaat, M., Gagliardi, C., Patel, B., and Ripoll, C. (2008). Adipose-Derived Stem Cells: Isolation, Expansion and Differentiation. Methods 45 (2), 115–120. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.03.006
Cai, C., Wang, W., Liang, J., Li, Y., Lu, M., Cui, W., et al. (2021). MMP-2 Responsive Unidirectional Hydrogel-Electrospun Patch Loading TGF-Beta 1 siRNA Polyplexes for Peritendinous Anti-Adhesion. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 (6), 2008364. doi:10.1002/adfm.202008364
Calejo, I., Costa-Almeida, R., Reis, R. L., and Gomes, M. E. (2019). A Textile Platform Using Continuous Aligned and Textured Composite Microfibers to Engineer Tendon-To-Bone Interface Gradient Scaffolds. Adv. Healthc. Mater 8 (15), e1900200. doi:10.1002/adhm.201900200
Cardwell, R. D., Dahlgren, L. A., and Goldstein, A. S. (2014). Electrospun Fibre Diameter, Not Alignment, Affects Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation into the Tendon/Ligament Lineage. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 8 (12), 937–945. doi:10.1002/term.1589
Chen, L., Wang, G.-D., Liu, J.-P., Wang, H.-S., Liu, X.-M., Wang, Q., et al. (2015). miR-135a Modulates Tendon Stem/Progenitor Cell Senescence via Suppressing ROCK1. Bone 71, 210–216. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2014.11.001
Chen, P., Cui, L., Chen, G., You, T., Li, W., Zuo, J., et al. (2019). The Application of BMP-12-Overexpressing Mesenchymal Stem Cells Loaded 3D-Printed PLGA Scaffolds in Rabbit Rotator Cuff Repair. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 138, 79–88. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.041
Chen, P., Cui, L., Fu, S. C., Shen, L., Zhang, W., You, T., et al. (2020). The 3D-Printed PLGA Scaffolds Loaded with Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Augment the Healing of Rotator Cuff Repair in the Rabbits. Cell Transpl. 29, 963689720973647. doi:10.1177/0963689720973647
Chen, Y., Xu, Y., Li, M., Shi, Q., and Chen, C. (2020). Application of Autogenous Urine-Derived Stem Cell Sheet Enhances Rotator Cuff Healing in a Canine Model. Am. J. Sports Med. 48 (14), 3454–3466. doi:10.1177/0363546520962774
Chen, S.-H., Chen, Z.-Y., Lin, Y.-H., Chen, S.-H., Chou, P.-Y., Kao, H.-K., et al. (2021). Extracellular Vesicles of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Promote the Healing of Traumatized Achilles Tendons. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (22), 12373. doi:10.3390/ijms222212373
Cheng, B., Ge, H., Zhou, J., and Zhang, Q. (2014). TSG-6 Mediates the Effect of Tendon Derived Stem Cells for Rotator Cuff Healing. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 18 (2), 247–251.
Ciardulli, M. C., Marino, L., Lovecchio, J., Giordano, E., Forsyth, N. R., Selleri, C., et al. (2020). Tendon and Cytokine Marker Expression by Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Hyaluronate/Poly-Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid (PLGA)/Fibrin Three-Dimensional (3D) Scaffold. Cells 9 (5), 1268. doi:10.3390/cells9051268
Craig, R., Holt, T., and Rees, J. L. (2017). Acute Rotator Cuff Tears. BMJ 359, j5366. doi:10.1136/bmj.j5366
Dai, L., Hu, X., Zhang, X., Zhu, J., Zhang, J., Fu, X., et al. (2015). Different Tenogenic Differentiation Capacities of Different Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Presence of BMP-12. J. Transl. Med. 13 (1), 200. doi:10.1186/s12967-015-0560-7
Dai, Y., Li, X., Wu, R., Jin, Y., and Gao, C. (2018). Macrophages of Different Phenotypes Influence the Migration of BMSCs in PLGA Scaffolds with Different Pore Size. Biotechnol. J. 13 (1), 1700297. doi:10.1002/biot.201700297
De Francesco, F., Ricci, G., D'Andrea, F., Nicoletti, G. F., and Ferraro, G. A. (2015). Human Adipose Stem Cells: From Bench to Bedside. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 21 (6), 572–584. doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2014.0608
Degen, R. M., Carbone, A., Carballo, C., Zong, J., Chen, T., Lebaschi, A., et al. (2016). The Effect of Purified Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Rotator Cuff Tendon Healing in an Athymic Rat. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. 32 (12), 2435–2443. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2016.04.019
Dei Giudici, L., and Castricini, R. (2020). Local Autologous Stem Cells Application in Rotator Cuff Repairs: "LASCA" Technique. Arthrosc. Tech. 9 (10), e1571–e1575. doi:10.1016/j.eats.2020.06.022
Docheva, D., Popov, C., Mutschler, W., and Schieker, M. (2007). Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Contact with Their Environment: Surface Characteristics and the Integrin System. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 11 (1), 21–38. doi:10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00001.x
Docheva, D., Müller, S. A., Majewski, M., and Evans, C. H. (2015). Biologics for Tendon Repair. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 84, 222–239. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2014.11.015
Dyrna, F., Zakko, P., Pauzenberger, L., McCarthy, M. B., Mazzocca, A. D., and Dyment, N. A. (2018). Human Subacromial Bursal Cells Display Superior Engraftment Versus Bone Marrow Stromal Cells in Murine Tendon Repair. Am. J. Sports Med. 46 (14), 3511–3520. doi:10.1177/0363546518802842
Edmonds, E. W., and Dengerink, D. D. (2014). Common Conditions in the Overhead Athlete. Am. Fam. Physician 89 (7), 537–541.
El Khatib, M., Mauro, A., Di Mattia, M., Wyrwa, R., Schweder, M., Ancora, M., et al. (2020). Electrospun PLGA Fiber Diameter and Alignment of Tendon Biomimetic Fleece Potentiate Tenogenic Differentiation and Immunomodulatory Function of Amniotic Epithelial Stem Cells. Cells 9 (5), 1207. doi:10.3390/cells9051207
Escamilla, R. F., and Andrews, J. R. (2009). Shoulder Muscle Recruitment Patterns and Related Biomechanics during Upper Extremity Sports. Sports Med. 39 (7), 569–590. doi:10.2165/00007256-200939070-00004
Fenwick, S. A., Hazleman, B. L., and Riley, G. P. (2002). The Vasculature and its Role in the Damaged and Healing Tendon. Arthritis Res. 4 (4), 252–260. doi:10.1186/ar416
Forsberg, M. H., Kink, J. A., Hematti, P., and Capitini, C. M. (2020). Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Exosomes: Progress and Challenges. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 665. doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.00665
Fu, G., Lu, L., Pan, Z., Fan, A., and Yin, F. (2021). Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Exosomes Facilitate Rotator Cuff Repair by Mediating Tendon-Derived Stem Cells. Regen. Med. 16 (04), 359–372. doi:10.2217/rme-2021-0004
Galatz, L. M., Ball, C. M., Teefey, S. A., Middleton, W. D., and Yamaguchi, K. (2004). The Outcome and Repair Integrity of Completely Arthroscopically Repaired Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 86 (2), 219–224. doi:10.2106/00004623-200402000-00002
Gardiner, C., Vizio, D. D., Sahoo, S., Théry, C., Witwer, K. W., Wauben, M., et al. (2016). Techniques Used for the Isolation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles: Results of a Worldwide Survey. J. Extracell. Vesicles 5, 32945. doi:10.3402/jev.v5.32945
Garg, T., Singh, O., Arora, S., and Murthy, R. S. R. (2012). Scaffold: A Novel Carrier for Cell and Drug Delivery. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carr. Syst. 29 (1), 1–63. doi:10.1615/critrevtherdrugcarriersyst.v29.i1.10
Geng, Y., Zhao, X., Xu, J., Zhang, X., Hu, G., Fu, S.-C., et al. (2020). Overexpression of Mechanical Sensitive miR-337-3p Alleviates Ectopic Ossification in Rat Tendinopathy Model via Targeting IRS1 and Nox4 of Tendon-Derived Stem Cells. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 12 (4), 305–317. doi:10.1093/jmcb/mjz030
Gulotta, L. V., Kovacevic, D., Ehteshami, J. R., Dagher, E., Packer, J. D., and Rodeo, S. A. (2009). Application of Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rotator Cuff Repair Model. Am. J. Sports Med. 37 (11), 2126–2133. doi:10.1177/0363546509339582
Gulotta, L. V., Kovacevic, D., Montgomery, S., Ehteshami, J. R., Packer, J. D., and Rodeo, S. A. (2010). Stem Cells Genetically Modified with the Developmental Gene MT1-MMP Improve Regeneration of the Supraspinatus Tendon-To-Bone Insertion Site. Am. J. Sports Med. 38 (7), 1429–1437. doi:10.1177/0363546510361235
Gulotta, L. V., Kovacevic, D., Packer, J. D., Deng, X. H., and Rodeo, S. A. (2011). Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transduced with Scleraxis Improve Rotator Cuff Healing in a Rat Model. Am. J. Sports Med. 39 (6), 1282–1289. doi:10.1177/0363546510395485
Gulotta, L. V., Kovacevic, D., Packer, J. D., Ehteshami, J. R., and Rodeo, S. A. (2011). Adenoviral-Mediated Gene Transfer of Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-13 Does Not Improve Rotator Cuff Healing in a Rat Model. Am. J. Sports Med. 39 (1), 180–187. doi:10.1177/0363546510379339
Guo, J., Chan, K.-M., Zhang, J.-F., and Li, G. (2016). Tendon-Derived Stem Cells Undergo Spontaneous Tenogenic Differentiation. Exp. Cell Res. 341 (1), 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.01.007
Haleem, A., Gohal, C., Leroux, T., Henry, P., Alolabi, B., and Khan, M. (2021). Primary Arthroscopic Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Results in Significant Improvements with Low Rate of Re-Tear. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 29 (7), 2134–2142. doi:10.1007/s00167-020-06190-3
Han, L., Fang, W. L., Jin, B., Xu, S. C., Zheng, X., and Hu, Y. G. (2019). Enhancement of Tendon-Bone Healing after Rotator Cuff Injuries Using Combined Therapy with Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Platelet Rich Plasma. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 23 (20), 9075–9084. doi:10.26355/eurrev_201910_19310
Harada, Y., Mifune, Y., Inui, A., Sakata, R., Muto, T., Takase, F., et al. (2017). Rotator Cuff Repair Using Cell Sheets Derived from Human Rotator Cuff in a Rat Model. J. Orthop. Res. 35 (2), 289–296. doi:10.1002/jor.23289
He, J., Ping, S., Yu, F., Yuan, X., Wang, J., and Qi, J. (2021). Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes: Therapeutic Implications for Rotator Cuff Injury. Regen. Med. 16 (8), 803–815. doi:10.2217/rme-2020-0183
Hegedus, E. J., Cook, C., Brennan, M., Wyland, D., Garrison, J. C., and Driesner, D. (2010). Vascularity and Tendon Pathology in the Rotator Cuff: A Review of Literature and Implications for Rehabilitation and Surgery. Br. J. Sports Med. 44 (12), 838–847. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.053769
Heo, J. S., Choi, Y., Kim, H.-S., and Kim, H. O. (2016). Comparison of Molecular Profiles of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Bone Marrow, Umbilical Cord Blood, Placenta and Adipose Tissue. Int. J. Mol. Med. 37 (1), 115–125. doi:10.3892/ijmm.2015.2413
Hernigou, P., Flouzat Lachaniette, C. H., Delambre, J., Zilber, S., Duffiet, P., Chevallier, N., et al. (2014). Biologic Augmentation of Rotator Cuff Repair with Mesenchymal Stem Cells during Arthroscopy Improves Healing and Prevents Further Tears: a Case-Controlled Study. Int. Orthop. 38 (9), 1811–1818. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2391-1
Hexter, A. T., Pendegrass, C., Haddad, F., and Blunn, G. (2017). Demineralized Bone Matrix to Augment Tendon-Bone Healing: A Systematic Review. Orthop. J. Sports Med. 5 (10), 2325967117734517. doi:10.1177/2325967117734517
Hortensius, R. A., Ebens, J. H., Dewey, M. J., and Harley, B. A. C. (2018). Incorporation of the Amniotic Membrane as an Immunomodulatory Design Element in Collagen Scaffolds for Tendon Repair. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 4 (12), 4367–4377. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01154
Huang, Y., He, B., Wang, L., Yuan, B., Shu, H., Zhang, F., et al. (2020). Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Promote Rotator Cuff Tendon-Bone Healing by Promoting Angiogenesis and Regulating M1 Macrophages in Rats. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 11 (1), 496. doi:10.1186/s13287-020-02005-x
Hurd, J. L., Facile, T. R., Weiss, J., Hayes, M., Hayes, M., Furia, J. P., et al. (2020). Safety and Efficacy of Treating Symptomatic, Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears with Fresh, Uncultured, Unmodified, Autologous Adipose-Derived Regenerative Cells (UA-ADRCs) Isolated at the Point of Care: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled First-In-Human Pilot Study. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 15 (1), 122. doi:10.1186/s13018-020-01631-8
Ji, X., Wang, M., Chen, F., and Zhou, J. (2017). Urine-Derived Stem Cells: The Present and the Future. Stem Cells Int. 2017, 4378947. doi:10.1155/2017/4378947
Jo, C. H., Shin, J. S., Park, I. W., Kim, H., and Lee, S. Y. (2013). Multiple Channeling Improves the Structural Integrity of Rotator Cuff Repair. Am. J. Sports Med. 41 (11), 2650–2657. doi:10.1177/0363546513499138
Jo, C. H., Chai, J. W., Jeong, E. C., Oh, S., and Yoon, K. S. (2020). Intratendinous Injection of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease: a 2-year Follow-Up Study. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. 36 (4), 971–980. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2019.11.120
Kaizawa, Y., Franklin, A., Leyden, J., Behn, A. W., Tulu, U. S., Sotelo Leon, D., et al. (2019). Augmentation of Chronic Rotator Cuff Healing Using Adipose‐Derived Stem Cell‐Seeded Human Tendon‐Derived Hydrogel. J. Orthop. Res. 37 (4), 877–886. doi:10.1002/jor.24250
Kannus, P. (2000). Structure of the Tendon Connective Tissue. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 10 (6), 312–320. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0838.2000.010006312.x
Kasper, G., Mao, L., Geissler, S., Draycheva, A., Trippens, J., Kühnisch, J., et al. (2009). Insights into Mesenchymal Stem Cell Aging: Involvement of Antioxidant Defense and Actin Cytoskeleton. Stem Cells 27 (6), 1288–1297. doi:10.1002/stem.49
Keshtkar, S., Azarpira, N., and Ghahremani, M. H. (2018). Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Novel Frontiers in Regenerative Medicine. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 9 (1), 63. doi:10.1186/s13287-018-0791-7
Kida, Y., Morihara, T., Matsuda, K.-I., Kajikawa, Y., Tachiiri, H., Iwata, Y., et al. (2013). Bone Marrow-Derived Cells from the Footprint Infiltrate into the Repaired Rotator Cuff. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 22 (2), 197–205. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2012.02.007
Kim, Y. S., Sung, C. H., Chung, S. H., Kwak, S. J., and Koh, Y. G. (2017). Does an Injection of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Loaded in Fibrin Glue Influence Rotator Cuff Repair Outcomes? A Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Am. J. Sports Med. 45 (9), 2010–2018. doi:10.1177/0363546517702863
Kim, H., Shim, I. K., Choi, J. H., Lee, E. S., Lee, Y. N., Jeon, I. H., et al. (2022). Extracellular Vesicles Delivered by Injectable Collagen Promote Bone-Tendon Interface Healing and Prevent Fatty Degeneration of Rotator Cuff Muscle. Arthrosc. - J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2022.01.008
Kokubu, S., Inaki, R., Hoshi, K., and Hikita, A. (2020). Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Improve Tendon Repair and Prevent Ectopic Ossification in Tendinopathy by Inhibiting Inflammation and Inducing Neovascularization in the Early Stage of Tendon Healing. Regen. Ther. 14, 103–110. doi:10.1016/j.reth.2019.12.003
Kwon, D. R., Park, G.-Y., and Lee, S. C. (2019). Regenerative Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Dosage in a Chronic Rotator Cuff Tendon Tear in a Rabbit Model. Regen. Med. 14 (11), 1001–1012. doi:10.2217/rme-2018-0125
Laranjeira, M., Domingues, R. M. A., Costa-Almeida, R., Reis, R. L., and Gomes, M. E. (2017). 3D Mimicry of Native-Tissue-Fiber Architecture Guides Tendon-Derived Cells and Adipose Stem Cells into Artificial Tendon Constructs. Small 13 (31), 1700689. doi:10.1002/smll.201700689
Lee, W., Kim, S.-J., Choi, C.-H., Choi, Y.-R., and Chun, Y.-M. (2019). Intra-Articular Injection of Steroids in the Early Postoperative Period Does Not Have an Adverse Effect on the Clinical Outcomes and the Re-tear Rate after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 27 (12), 3912–3919. doi:10.1007/s00167-019-05486-3
Leonardi, E. A., Xiao, M., Murray, I. R., Robinson, W. H., and Abrams, G. D. (2021). Tendon-Derived Progenitor Cells with Multilineage Potential Are Present within Human Patellar Tendon. Orthop. J. Sports Med. 9 (8), 23259671211023452. doi:10.1177/23259671211023452
Lewis, J. S. (2010). Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Model for the Continuum of Pathology and Related Management. Br. J. sports Med. 44 (13), 918–923. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.054817
Lim, W. L., Liau, L. L., Ng, M. H., Chowdhury, S. R., and Law, J. X. (2019). Current Progress in Tendon and Ligament Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 16 (6), 549–571. doi:10.1007/s13770-019-00196-w
Lin, T. W., Cardenas, L., and Soslowsky, L. J. (2004). Biomechanics of Tendon Injury and Repair. J. Biomech. 37 (6), 865–877. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.11.005
Lin, D. J., Wong, T. T., and Kazam, J. K. (2018). Shoulder Injuries in the Overhead-Throwing Athlete: Epidemiology, Mechanisms of Injury, and Imaging Findings. Radiology 286 (2), 370–387. doi:10.1148/radiol.2017170481
Linsell, L., Dawson, J., Zondervan, K., Rose, P., Randall, T., Fitzpatrick, R., et al. (2006). Prevalence and Incidence of Adults Consulting for Shoulder Conditions in UK Primary Care; Patterns of Diagnosis and Referral. Rheumatol. Oxf. Engl. 45 (2), 215–221. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kei139
Lipner, J., Shen, H., Cavinatto, L., Liu, W., Havlioglu, N., Xia, Y., et al. (2015). In Vivo Evaluation of Adipose-Derived Stromal Cells Delivered with a Nanofiber Scaffold for Tendon-To-Bone Repair. Tissue Eng. Part A 21 (21-22), 2766–2774. doi:10.1089/ten.TEA.2015.0101
Liu, C., Luo, J. W., Liang, T., Lin, L. X., Luo, Z. P., Zhuang, Y. Q., et al. (2018). Matrix Stiffness Regulates the Differentiation of Tendon-Derived Stem Cells through FAK-ERK1/2 Activation. Exp. Cell Res. 373 (1-2), 62–70. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.08.023
Liu, Q., Yu, Y., Reisdorf, R. L., Qi, J., Lu, C.-K., Berglund, L. J., et al. (2019). Engineered Tendon-Fibrocartilage-Bone Composite and Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sheet Augmentation Promotes Rotator Cuff Healing in a Non-Weight-Bearing Canine Model. Biomaterials 192, 189–198. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.037
Liu, R., Zhang, S., and Chen, X. (2020). Injectable Hydrogels for Tendon and Ligament Tissue Engineering. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 14 (9), 1333–1348. doi:10.1002/term.3078
Liu, H., Zhang, M., Shi, M., Zhang, T., Lu, W., Yang, S., et al. (2021). Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Derived Exosomes Promote Tendon Healing by Activating Both SMAD1/5/9 and SMAD2/3. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 12 (1), 338. doi:10.1186/s13287-021-02410-w
Liu, Y. J., Wang, H. J., Xue, Z. W., Cheang, L. H., Tam, M. S., Li, R. W., et al. (2021). Long Noncoding RNA H19 Accelerates Tenogenic Differentiation by Modulating miR-140-5p/VEGFA Signaling. Eur. J. Histochem 65 (3), 3297. doi:10.4081/ejh.2021.3297
Longo, U. G., Berton, A., Khan, W. S., Maffulli, N., and Denaro, V. (2011). Histopathology of Rotator Cuff Tears. Sports Med. Arthrosc. Rev. 19 (3), 227–236. doi:10.1097/jsa.0b013e318213bccb
Longo, U. G., Lamberti, A., Petrillo, S., Maffulli, N., and Denaro, V. (2012). Scaffolds in Tendon Tissue Engineering. Stem Cells Int. 2012, 517165. doi:10.1155/2012/517165
Ma, T., Fu, B., Yang, X., Xiao, Y., and Pan, M. (2019). Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes Promote Cell Proliferation, Migration, and Inhibit Cell Apoptosis via Wnt/β‐Catenin Signaling in Cutaneous Wound Healing. J. Cell Biochem. 120 (6), 10847–10854. doi:10.1002/jcb.28376
Millar, N. L., Gilchrist, D. S., Akbar, M., Reilly, J. H., Kerr, S. C., Campbell, A. L., et al. (2015). MicroRNA29a Regulates IL-33-Mediated Tissue Remodelling in Tendon Disease. Nat. Commun. 6, 6774. doi:10.1038/ncomms7774
Minagawa, H., Yamamoto, N., Abe, H., Fukuda, M., Seki, N., Kikuchi, K., et al. (2013). Prevalence of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Rotator Cuff Tears in the General Population: From Mass-Screening in One Village. J. Orthop. 10 (1), 8–12. doi:10.1016/j.jor.2013.01.008
Mitchell, C., Adebajo, A., Hay, E., and Carr, A. (2005). Shoulder Pain: Diagnosis and Management in Primary Care. BMJ 331 (7525), 1124–1128. doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7525.1124
Mora, M. V., Antuña, S. A., Arranz, M. G., Carrascal, M. T., and Barco, R. (2014). Application of Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells in a Rat Rotator Cuff Repair Model. Injury 45, S22–S27. doi:10.1016/s0020-1383(14)70006-3
Muench, L. N., Baldino, J. B., Berthold, D. P., Kia, C., Lebaschi, A., Cote, M. P., et al. (2020). Subacromial Bursa-Derived Cells Demonstrate High Proliferation Potential Regardless of Patient Demographics and Rotator Cuff Tear Characteristics. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. 36 (11), 2794–2802. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2020.06.008
Mukovozov, I., Byun, S., Farrokhyar, F., and Wong, I. (2013). Time to Surgery in Acute Rotator Cuff Tear: A Systematic Review. Bone & Jt. Res. 2 (7), 122–128. doi:10.1302/2046-3758.27.2000164
Nourissat, G., Berenbaum, F., and Duprez, D. (2015). Tendon Injury: From Biology to Tendon Repair. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 11 (4), 223–233. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2015.26
Oh, J. H., Chung, S. W., Kim, S. H., Chung, J. Y., and Kim, J. Y. (2014). 2013 Neer Award: Effect of the Adipose-Derived Stem Cell for the Improvement of Fatty Degeneration and Rotator Cuff Healing in Rabbit Model. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 23 (4), 445–455. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2013.07.054
Oliva, F., Piccirilli, E., Bossa, M., Via, A. G., Colombo, A., Chillemi, C., et al. (2015). I.S.Mu.L.T - Rotator Cuff Tears Guidelines. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 5 (4), 227–263. doi:10.11138/mltj/2015.5.4.227
Orr, S. B., Chainani, A., Hippensteel, K. J., Kishan, A., Gilchrist, C., Garrigues, N. W., et al. (2015). Aligned Multilayered Electrospun Scaffolds for Rotator Cuff Tendon Tissue Engineering. Acta Biomater. 24, 117–126. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.010
Park, G.-Y., Kwon, D. R., and Lee, S. C. (2015). Regeneration of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tendon Tear After Ultrasound-Guided Injection with Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rabbit Model. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 4 (11), 1344–1351. doi:10.5966/sctm.2015-0040
Perucca Orfei, C., Viganò, M., Pearson, J. R., Colombini, A., De Luca, P., Ragni, E., et al. (2019). In Vitro Induction of Tendon-Specific Markers in Tendon Cells, Adipose- and Bone Marrow-Derived Stem Cells Is Dependent on TGFβ3, BMP-12 and Ascorbic Acid Stimulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 (1), 149. doi:10.3390/ijms20010149
Picavet, H. S., and Schouten, J. S. (2003). Musculoskeletal Pain in the Netherlands: Prevalences, Consequences and Risk Groups, the DMC(3)-study. Pain 102 (1-2), 167–178. doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00372-x
Pina, S., Ribeiro, V. P., Marques, C. F., Maia, F. R., Silva, T. H., Reis, R. L., et al. (2019). Scaffolding Strategies for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Applications. Materials 12 (11), 1824. doi:10.3390/ma12111824
Qiu, Y., Lim, J. J., Scott, L., Adams, R. C., Bui, H. T., and Temenoff, J. S. (2011). PEG-Based Hydrogels with Tunable Degradation Characteristics to Control Delivery of Marrow Stromal Cells for Tendon Overuse Injuries. Acta Biomater. 7 (3), 959–966. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.002
Rak Kwon, D., Jung, S., Jang, J., Park, G.-Y., Suk Moon, Y., and Lee, S. C. (2020). A 3-Dimensional Bioprinted Scaffold with Human Umbilical Cord Blood-Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improves Regeneration of Chronic Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear in a Rabbit Model. Am. J. Sports Med. 48 (4), 947–958. doi:10.1177/0363546520904022
Rashid, M. S., Cooper, C., Cook, J., Cooper, D., Dakin, S. G., Snelling, S., et al. (2017). Increasing Age and Tear Size Reduce Rotator Cuff Repair Healing Rate at 1 year: Data from a Large Randomized Controlled Trial. Acta Orthop. 88 (6), 606–611. doi:10.1080/17453674.2017.1370844
Reiner, A. T., Witwer, K. W., van Balkom, B. W. M., de Beer, J., Brodie, C., Corteling, R. L., et al. (2017). Concise Review: Developing Best-Practice Models for the Therapeutic Use of Extracellular Vesicles. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 6 (8), 1730–1739. doi:10.1002/sctm.17-0055
Rinella, L., Marano, F., Paletto, L., Fraccalvieri, M., Annaratone, L., Castellano, I., et al. (2018). Extracorporeal Shock Waves Trigger Tenogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells. Connect. tissue Res. 59 (6), 561–573. doi:10.1080/03008207.2018.1424147
Rossetti, L., Kuntz, L. A., Kunold, E., Schock, J., Müller, K. W., Grabmayr, H., et al. (2017). The Microstructure and Micromechanics of the Tendon-Bone Insertion. Nat. Mater 16 (6), 664–670. doi:10.1038/nmat4863
Rothrauff, B. B., Smith, C. A., Ferrer, G. A., Novaretti, J. V., Pauyo, T., Chao, T., et al. (2019). The Effect of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells on Enthesis Healing after Repair of Acute and Chronic Massive Rotator Cuff Tears in Rats. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 28 (4), 654–664. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.044
Ruiz-Alonso, S., Lafuente-Merchan, M., Ciriza, J., Saenz-del-Burgo, L., and Pedraz, J. L. (2021). Tendon Tissue Engineering: Cells, Growth Factors, Scaffolds and Production Techniques. J. Control. Release 333, 448–486. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.03.040
Saveh-Shemshaki, N., Nair, L. S., and Laurencin, C. T. (2019). Nanofiber-Based Matrices for Rotator Cuff Regenerative Engineering. Acta Biomater. 94, 64–81. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.041
Schnabel, L. V., Lynch, M. E., van der Meulen, M. C. H., Yeager, A. E., Kornatowski, M. A., and Nixon, A. J. (2009). Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Gene-Enhanced Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Structural Aspects of Healing in Equine Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Tendons. J. Orthop. Res. 27 (10), 1392–1398. doi:10.1002/jor.20887
Seida, J. C., LeBlanc, C., Schouten, J. R., Mousavi, S. S., Hartling, L., Vandermeer, B., et al. (2010). Systematic Review: Nonoperative and Operative Treatments for Rotator Cuff Tears. Ann. Intern Med. 153 (4), 246–255. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-153-4-201008170-00263
Shen, W., Chen, J., Yin, Z., Chen, X., Liu, H., Heng, B. C., et al. (2012). Allogenous Tendon Stem/Progenitor Cells in Silk Scaffold for Functional Shoulder Repair. Cell Transpl. 21 (5), 943–958. doi:10.3727/096368911x627453
Shi, Z., Wang, Q., and Jiang, D. (2019). Extracellular Vesicles from Bone Marrow-Derived Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Regulate Inflammation and Enhance Tendon Healing. J. Transl. Med. 17 (1), 211. doi:10.1186/s12967-019-1960-x
Shin, M. J., Shim, I. K., Kim, D. M., Choi, J. H., Lee, Y. N., Jeon, I.-H., et al. (2020). Engineered Cell Sheets for the Effective Delivery of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells for Tendon-To-Bone Healing. Am. J. Sports Med. 48 (13), 3347–3358. doi:10.1177/0363546520964445
Song, N., Armstrong, A. D., Li, F., Ouyang, H., and Niyibizi, C. (2014). Multipotent Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Human Subacromial Bursa: Potential for Cell Based Tendon Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng. Part A 20 (1-2), 239–249. doi:10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0197
Song, H., Yin, Z., Wu, T., Li, Y., Luo, X., Xu, M., et al. (2018). Enhanced Effect of Tendon Stem/Progenitor Cells Combined with Tendon-Derived Decellularized Extracellular Matrix on Tendon Regeneration. Cell Transpl. 27 (11), 1634–1643. doi:10.1177/0963689718805383
Takahashi, H., Tamaki, H., Oyama, M., Yamamoto, N., and Onishi, H. (2017). Time-Dependent Changes in the Structure of Calcified Fibrocartilage in the Rat Achilles Tendon-Bone Interface with Sciatic Denervation. Anat. Rec. (Hoboken) 300 (12), 2166–2174. doi:10.1002/ar.23684
Taniguchi, N., Suenaga, N., Oizumi, N., Miyoshi, N., Yamaguchi, H., Inoue, K., et al. (2015). Bone Marrow Stimulation at the Footprint of Arthroscopic Surface-Holding Repair Advances Cuff Repair Integrity. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 24 (6), 860–866. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2014.09.031
Tao, S.-C., Yuan, T., Zhang, Y.-L., Yin, W.-J., Guo, S.-C., and Zhang, C.-Q. (2017). Exosomes Derived from miR-140-5p-Overexpressing Human Synovial Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhance Cartilage Tissue Regeneration and Prevent Osteoarthritis of the Knee in a Rat Model. Theranostics 7 (1), 180–195. doi:10.7150/thno.17133
Thangarajah, T., Sanghani-Kerai, A., Henshaw, F., Lambert, S. M., Pendegrass, C. J., and Blunn, G. W. (2018). Application of a Demineralized Cortical Bone Matrix and Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Model of Chronic Rotator Cuff Degeneration. Am. J. Sports Med. 46 (1), 98–108. doi:10.1177/0363546517727512
Theisen, C., Fuchs-Winkelmann, S., Knappstein, K., Efe, T., Schmitt, J., Paletta, J. R., et al. (2010). Influence of Nanofibers on Growth and Gene Expression of Human Tendon Derived Fibroblast. Biomed. Eng. Online 9 (1), 9–12. doi:10.1186/1475-925X-9-9
Théry, C., Witwer, K. W., Aikawa, E., Alcaraz, M. J., Anderson, J. D., Andriantsitohaina, R., et al. (2018). Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): A Position Statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and Update of the MISEV2014 Guidelines. J. Extracell. Vesicles 7 (1), 1535750. doi:10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750
Thigpen, C. A., Shaffer, M. A., Gaunt, B. W., Leggin, B. G., Williams, G. R., and Wilcox, R. B. (2016). The American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists' Consensus Statement on Rehabilitation Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 25 (4), 521–535. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2015.12.018
Thomopoulos, S., Genin, G. M., and Galatz, L. M. (2010). The Development and Morphogenesis of the Tendon-To-Bone Insertion - What Development Can Teach Us about Healing -. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 10 (1), 35–45.
Titchener, A. G., White, J. J. E., Hinchliffe, S. R., Tambe, A. A., Hubbard, R. B., and Clark, D. I. (2014). Comorbidities in Rotator Cuff Disease: A Case-Control Study. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 23 (9), 1282–1288. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.019
Toh, W. S., Zhang, B., Lai, R. C., and Lim, S. K. (2018). Immune Regulatory Targets of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Exosomes/Small Extracellular Vesicles in Tissue Regeneration. Cytotherapy 20 (12), 1419–1426. doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2018.09.008
Tomás, A. R., Gonçalves, A. I., Paz, E., Freitas, P., Domingues, R. M. A., and Gomes, M. E. (2019). Magneto-mechanical Actuation of Magnetic Responsive Fibrous Scaffolds Boosts Tenogenesis of Human Adipose Stem Cells. Nanoscale 11 (39), 18255–18271. doi:10.1039/c9nr04355a
Tsai, C.-C., Huang, T.-F., Ma, H.-L., Chiang, E.-R., and Hung, S.-C. (2013). Isolation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Shoulder Rotator Cuff: A Potential Source for Muscle and Tendon Repair. Cell Transpl. 22 (3), 413–422. doi:10.3727/096368912x656090
Utsunomiya, H., Uchida, S., Sekiya, I., Sakai, A., Moridera, K., and Nakamura, T. (2013). Isolation and Characterization of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Shoulder Tissues Involved in Rotator Cuff Tears. Am. J. Sports Med. 41 (3), 657–668. doi:10.1177/0363546512473269
Vallières, M., and Du Souich, P. (2010). Modulation of Inflammation by Chondroitin Sulfate. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 18, S1–S6. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2010.02.017
Voleti, P. B., Buckley, M. R., and Soslowsky, L. J. (2012). Tendon Healing: Repair and Regeneration. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 14, 47–71. doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150122
Vuornos, K., Björninen, M., Talvitie, E., Paakinaho, K., Kellomäki, M., Huhtala, H., et al. (2016). Human Adipose Stem Cells Differentiated on Braided Polylactide Scaffolds Is a Potential Approach for Tendon Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng. Part A 22 (5-6), 513–523. doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2015.0276
Wang, M., Yang, Y., Yang, D., Luo, F., Liang, W., Guo, S., et al. (2009). The Immunomodulatory Activity of Human Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cellsin Vitro. Immunology 126 (2), 220–232. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02891.x
Wang, B., Guo, J., Feng, L., Suen, C.-W., Fu, W.-M., Zhang, J.-F., et al. (2016). MiR124 Suppresses Collagen Formation of Human Tendon Derived Stem Cells through Targeting Egr1. Exp. Cell Res. 347 (2), 360–366. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.08.018
Wang, C., Hu, Q., Song, W., Yu, W., and He, Y. (2020). Adipose Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Decrease Fatty Infiltration and Enhance Rotator Cuff Healing in a Rabbit Model of Chronic Tears. Am. J. Sports Med. 48 (6), 1456–1464. doi:10.1177/0363546520908847
Wang, H.-N., Huang, Y.-C., and Ni, G.-X. (2020). Mechanotransduction of Stem Cells for Tendon Repair. World J. Stem Cells 12 (9), 952–965. doi:10.4252/wjsc.v12.i9.952
Wang, C., Zhang, Y., Zhang, G., Yu, W., and He, Y. (2021). Adipose Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Ameliorate Chronic Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy by Regulating Macrophage Polarization: From a Mouse Model to a Study in Human Tissue. Am. J. Sports Med. 49 (9), 2321–2331. doi:10.1177/03635465211020010
Watts, A. E., Millar, N. L., Platt, J., Kitson, S. M., Akbar, M., Rech, R., et al. (2017). MicroRNA29a Treatment Improves Early Tendon Injury. Mol. Ther. 25 (10), 2415–2426. doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.07.015
Whittle, S., and Buchbinder, R. (2015). In the Clinic. Rotator Cuff Disease. Ann. Intern Med. 162 (1), Itc1–15. doi:10.7326/AITC201501060
Won, Y.-W., Patel, A. N., and Bull, D. A. (2014). Cell Surface Engineering to Enhance Mesenchymal Stem Cell Migration toward an SDF-1 Gradient. Biomaterials 35 (21), 5627–5635. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.070
Woo, C. H., Kim, H. K., Jung, G. Y., Jung, Y. J., Lee, K. S., Yun, Y. E., et al. (2020). Small Extracellular Vesicles from Human Adipose‐derived Stem Cells Attenuate Cartilage Degeneration. J. Extracell. Vesicles 9 (1), 1735249. doi:10.1080/20013078.2020.1735249
Yamada, T., Gotoh, M., Nakama, K., Mitsui, Y., Higuchi, F., and Nagata, K. (2007). Effects of Hyaluronan on Cell Proliferation and mRNA Expression of Procollagens α1 (I) and α1 (III) in Tendon-Derived Fibroblasts from Patients with Rotator Cuff Disease. Am. J. Sports Med. 35 (11), 1870–1876. doi:10.1177/0363546507305015
Yang, P. J., and Temenoff, J. S. (2009). Engineering Orthopedic Tissue Interfaces. Tissue Engineering Part B. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 15 (2), 127–141. doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2008.0371
Yang, B.-C., Kuang, M.-J., Kang, J.-Y., Zhao, J., Ma, J.-X., and Ma, X.-L. (2020). Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Act via the miR-1263/Mob1/Hippo Signaling Pathway to Prevent Apoptosis in Disuse Osteoporosis. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun. 524 (4), 883–889. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.02.001
Yao, Z., Li, J., Xiong, H., Cui, H., Ning, J., Wang, S., et al. (2021). MicroRNA Engineered Umbilical Cord Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Direct Tendon Regeneration by mTOR Signaling. J. Nanobiotechnol 19 (1), 169. doi:10.1186/s12951-021-00906-4
Yasui, Y., Tonogai, I., Rosenbaum, A. J., Shimozono, Y., Kawano, H., and Kennedy, J. G. (2017). The Risk of Achilles Tendon Rupture in the Patients with Achilles Tendinopathy: Healthcare Database Analysis in the United States. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017, 7021862. doi:10.1155/2017/7021862
Yea, J.-H., Bae, T. S., Kim, B. J., Cho, Y. W., and Jo, C. H. (2020). Regeneration of the Rotator Cuff Tendon-To-Bone Interface Using Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Gradient Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds from Adipose Tissue in a Rat Model. Acta Biomater. 114, 104–116. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.020
Yin, Z., Chen, X., Zhu, T., Hu, J.-J., Song, H.-X., Shen, W.-L., et al. (2013). The Effect of Decellularized Matrices on Human Tendon Stem/Progenitor Cell Differentiation and Tendon Repair. Acta Biomater. 9 (12), 9317–9329. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.022
Yokoya, S., Mochizuki, Y., Nagata, Y., Deie, M., and Ochi, M. (2008). Tendon-Bone Insertion Repair and Regeneration Using Polyglycolic Acid Sheet in the Rabbit Rotator Cuff Injury Model. Am. J. Sports Med. 36 (7), 1298–1309. doi:10.1177/0363546508314416
Yu, H., Cheng, J., Shi, W., Ren, B., Zhao, F., Shi, Y., et al. (2020). Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Promote Tendon Regeneration by Facilitating the Proliferation and Migration of Endogenous Tendon Stem/Progenitor Cells. Acta biomater. 106, 328–341. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.051
Yun, Y. H., Lee, B. K., and Park, K. (2015). Controlled Drug Delivery: Historical Perspective for the Next Generation. J. Control. Release 219, 2–7. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.10.005
Zhang, J., and Wang, J. H.-C. (2010). Characterization of Differential Properties of Rabbit Tendon Stem Cells and Tenocytes. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 11, 10. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-11-10
Zhang, M., Liu, H., Cui, Q., Han, P., Yang, S., Shi, M., et al. (2020). Tendon Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Regulate Inflammation and Promote the High-Quality Healing of Injured Tendon. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 11 (1), 402–415. doi:10.1186/s13287-020-01918-x
Zhang, M., Liu, H., Cui, Q., Han, P., Yang, S., Shi, M., et al. (2020). Tendon Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Regulate Inflammation and Promote the High-Quality Healing of Injured Tendon. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 11 (1), 402. doi:10.1186/s13287-020-01918-x
Zhang, X., Cai, Z., Wu, M., Huangfu, X., Li, J., and Liu, X. (2021). Adipose Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Recover Impaired Matrix Metabolism of Torn Human Rotator Cuff Tendons by Maintaining Tissue Homeostasis. Am. J. Sports Med. 49 (4), 899–908. doi:10.1177/0363546521992469
Keywords: rotator cuff, stem cell, extracellular vesicle, exosome, biologic, regenerative medicine
Citation: Wang H-N, Rong X, Yang L-M, Hua W-Z and Ni G-X (2022) Advances in Stem Cell Therapies for Rotator Cuff Injuries. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10:866195. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.866195
Received: 30 January 2022; Accepted: 25 April 2022;
Published: 25 May 2022.
Edited by:
Feng-Juan Lyu, South China University of Technology, ChinaReviewed by:
Wei Seong Toh, National University of Singapore, SingaporeBjörn Rath, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Austria
Copyright © 2022 Wang, Rong, Yang, Hua and Ni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Guo-Xin Ni, niguoxin@bsu.edu.cn
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship