Specialty Grand Challenge ARTICLE
Thrombosis – besieged but poorly understood
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
In biology, thrombosis is a mechanism of maintaining the integrity of biological surfaces in higher mammals, limiting fluid loss, and facilitating the recognition, containment, and destruction of pathogens and foreign materials by a scaffold of fibrin and DNA strands. However, thrombosis may also lead to vascular occlusion and subsequent tissue damage.
In medicine, thrombosis is a hallmark of life-threatening cardiovascular diseases, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, or venous thromboembolism representing major causes of death in the Western civilization. Every year 17 million individuals die from cardiovascular disease (1, 2), comprising almost half of the global death toll in Europe. For example, in Austria, 34,000 patients suffered a cardiovascular death in 2012, accounting for 42.7% of all deaths, which is 1.7-fold the death toll of malignant diseases (3).
Cardiovascular science beyond clinical observation and anatomical dissection emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. A key observation was the epidemiological connection of hypertension and elevated plasma lipids with atherosclerotic vascular disease (4). Based on a more profound understanding of these risk factors, including exercise, body weight, and glucose metabolism, preventive measures were tested, leading to both primary and secondary preventions that have become powerful modulators of disease decreasing events by almost half. Since then, the establishment of coronary care units, cardiac catheterization, angioplasty, and surgery and the advent of modern medications many of which interfere with thrombosis and platelet aggregation, have contributed to fundamental improvements in cardiovascular care. However, much of the advances in cardiovascular science have been in the thrombosis field, stimulated by the discovery that myocardial infarction was due to thrombi in the coronary arteries (5). Traditionally, thrombosis has been viewed as the biochemical result of regulated cascades of protein interactions characterized by the activation of factor X and the activation of thrombin, resulting in the formation of fibrin. Accordingly, treatments for myocardial infarction, stroke, and venous thromboembolism have targeted pathways or more recently, individual protein moieties (Figure 1). Table 1 summarizes landmark trials leading to the approval of individual compounds. Over 50 years, a plethora of treatments has been brought to market (Table 1), with high efficacy and safety profiles that have contributed to the observation that death rates per 100,000 population were decreased from 450 in the 1950s to 150 around 2010 (6). For example, while 20–30% of hospitalized patients with myocardial infarction died within 30 days due to their underlying disease, this number has been substantially decreased to <5% most recently (7).
Table 1. Overview of treatments approved for vascular thrombosis (antithrombotics, comprising thrombolytics, anticoagulants, and antiplatelet drugs).
The public domain is thrilled with advances of cardiovascular medicine, and needs for deeper insights are hardly convincing in an environment of harmonized health care providing infarction networks, stent-for-life programs, and generally high standard guidelines in cardiovascular care.
However, do we understand thrombosis, do we understand recurrence, or do we prefer, for example, to mandate life-long factor X inhibition (38, 46–48) and statins (49) in patients at risk, without further investigation of underlying mechanisms?
More recently, a new view of thrombosis has emerged accounting for thrombosis as a vascular disease involving the dynamic interaction between platelets, circulating inflammatory cells, nucleic acids and proteins, and resident cells of the vascular wall. Milestones along the way of integrating the vessel wall in the thrombotic process were the discovery and action of nitric oxide (50, 51), the delineation of the LDL-cholesterol pathway (52, 53), the role of soluble and membrane bound tissue factor in atherosclerosis (54), and most recently the concept of “immunothrombosis” (55), linking inflammation and thrombosis as regulators of vascular integrity. Consequently, it was understood that the hemostatic system is a modulator of atherosclerosis (56). Thrombosis comprises both acute clotting and the more time-consuming process of thrombus resolution, which represents a vascular remodeling process that is driven by inflammation, angiogenesis, and cells of the innate immune system. A stimulus leading to thrombus formation induces an innate immune response that is supported by neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, by specific thrombosis-related molecules, and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETS), underpinning the importance of the following questions:
Is thrombosis the underlying process behind both arterial and venous disease that oftentimes combines in individual patients? (57) Do we understand endothelial dysfunction, and is it the nidus for thrombosis, and eventually vascular occlusion? And why do acute pulmonary emboli transform into chronic vascular obstructions in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension? Do we understand acute vascular syndromes simply by plaque rupture that is driven by macrophages that are loaded with lipids, and proteolytically cleave a thin-cap fibroatheroma thus triggering platelet activation? Does that concept explain acute coronary syndromes in young subjects without significant vascular stenoses? Is thrombosis per se the trigger for all vascular occlusion, be it chronic or acute? Is vascular occlusion the sequlae of deficient efferocytosis, and are those mechanisms driven by a deficiency of natural antibodies? What are the recognition sites for natural antibodies in the circulation? Which cells or cell fragments in the circulation are carrying oxidation specific epitopes, e.g., oxidized low-density lipoprotein (OxLDL) or malon-dialdehyde, and how do they function as danger associated molecular patterns? What is the role of nucleic acids, RNAse, and DNAse in thrombosis? Is NETting a preventable amplifier of acute thrombosis and the adverse vascular remodeling following thrombosis?
Are there potential therapeutic targets, upstream of mechanisms of thrombosis that might be applied without any potential bleeding risk? And might addressing those new targets prevent recurrence? Will we be able to identify a cellular program to minimize the potential of thrombosis and vascular occlusion? Will we be restoring normal Ca2+ cycling and reduce reperfusion injury? Will we be utilizing therapeutic antagomirs to control cellular responses to vascular injury? Will we be engineering vessels and vascular compartments of organ systems?
While bench-top research will address these questions, clinical research will complement advances both in drug-based trials and in interventional approaches. Since the PEITHO trial, the term of acute pulmonary revascularization has been coined in analogy to coronary revascularization, leading the way to interventional treatments (58) as adjunct or stand-alone treatments for the pulmonary circulation. Similar developments have recently been initiated in chronic pulmonary vascular disease and will change treatment paradigms (59–62).
Taken together, thrombosis is an important mediator of vascular disease, but cannot be seen in isolation. Data suggest that it most often occurs as the consequence of a loss of vascular barrier function, for example, in the context of inflammation and rarely as a primary event. To comprehend mechanisms of vascular barrier function is another challenge of thrombosis research of the future. To understand thrombosis, we need to look beyond thrombosis.
Conflict of Interest Statement
Irene M. Lang has relationships with drug companies including AOPOrphan Pharmaceuticals, Abbott, Actelion, Astra-Zeneca, Bayer-Schering, Cordis, Glaxo Smith Kline, Medtronic, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, and United Therapeutics. In addition to being investigator in trials involving these companies, relationships include consultancy service, research grants, and membership of scientific advisory boards.
2. Laslett LJ, Alagona P Jr., Clark BA III, Drozda JP Jr., Saldivar F, Wilson SR, et al. The worldwide environment of cardiovascular disease: prevalence, diagnosis, therapy, and policy issues: a report from the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol (2012) 60:S1–49. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.002
4. Kannel WB, Dawber TR, Kagan A, Revotskie N, Stokes J III. Factors of risk in the development of coronary heart disease – six year follow-up experience. The Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med (1961) 55:33–50. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-55-1-33
7. Kalla K, Christ G, Karnik R, Malzer R, Norman G, Prachar H, et al. Implementation of guidelines improves the standard of care: the Viennese registry on reperfusion strategies in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (Vienna STEMI registry). Circulation (2006) 113:2398–405. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.586198
8. Lewis HD Jr., Davis JW, Archibald DG, Steinke WE, Smitherman TC, Doherty JE III, et al. Protective effects of aspirin against acute myocardial infarction and death in men with unstable angina. Results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. N Engl J Med (1983) 309:396–403. doi:10.1056/NEJM198308183090703
9. Committee CS. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet (1996) 348:1329–39. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)09457-3
10. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, Tognoni G, Fox KK, et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med (2001) 345:494–502. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa010746
11. Montalescot G, Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, Murphy SA, Gibson CM, Mccabe CH, et al. Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (2009) 373:723–31. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60441-4
12. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, Angiolillo DJ, Meisel S, Dalby AJ, Verheugt FW, et al. Greater clinical benefit of more intensive oral antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel in patients with diabetes mellitus in the trial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38. Circulation (2008) 118:1626–36. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.791061
13. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, Cannon CP, Emanuelsson H, Held C, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med (2009) 361:1045–57. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0904327
14. Stevens JW, Simpson E, Harnan S, Squires H, Meng Y, Thomas S, et al. Systematic review of the efficacy of cilostazol, naftidrofuryl oxalate and pentoxifylline for the treatment of intermittent claudication. Br J Surg (2012) 99:1630–8. doi:10.1002/bjs.8895
15. Lefkovits J, Ivanhoe RJ, Califf RM, Bergelson BA, Anderson KM, Stoner GL, et al. Effects of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade by a chimeric monoclonal antibody (abciximab) on acute and six-month outcomes after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. EPIC investigators. Am J Cardiol (1996) 77:1045–51. doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00128-2
16. Stone GW, Maehara A, Witzenbichler B, Godlewski J, Parise H, Dambrink JH, et al. Intracoronary abciximab and aspiration thrombectomy in patients with large anterior myocardial infarction: the INFUSE-AMI randomized trial. JAMA (2012) 307:1817–26. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.421
17. Van’t Hof AW, Ten Berg J, Heestermans T, Dill T, Funck RC, Van Werkum W, et al. Prehospital initiation of tirofiban in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty (On-TIME 2): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (2008) 372:537–46. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61235-0
18. O’shea JC, Hafley GE, Greenberg S, Hasselblad V, Lorenz TJ, Kitt MM, et al. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin blockade with eptifibatide in coronary stent intervention: the ESPRIT trial: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA (2001) 285:2468–73. doi:10.1001/jama.285.19.2468
19. Ansell J, Hirsh J, Poller L, Bussey H, Jacobson A, Hylek E. The pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest (2004) 126:204S–33S. doi:10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.204S
22. Torbicki A, Perrier A, Konstantinides S, Agnelli G, Galie N, Pruszczyk P, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J (2008) 29:2276–315. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn310
23. Holbrook A, Schulman S, Witt DM, Vandvik PO, Fish J, Kovacs MJ, et al. Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest (2012) 141:152S–84S. doi:10.1378/chest.11-2295
24. ENOXACAN Study Group. Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for prevention of deep vein thrombosis in elective cancer surgery: a double-blind randomized multicentre trial with venographic assessment. Br J Surg (1997) 84:1099–103. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.d01-3882.x
25. Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, Bax J, Boersma E, Bueno H, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J (2011) 32:2999–3054. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr236
26. Task Force M, Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J (2013) 34:2949–3003. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht296
27. Simonneau G, Sors H, Charbonnier B, Page Y, Laaban JP, Azarian R, et al. A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for acute pulmonary embolism. The THESEE Study Group. Tinzaparine ou Heparine Standard: Evaluations dans l’Embolie Pulmonaire. N Engl J Med (1997) 337:663–9. doi:10.1056/NEJM199709043371002
28. Fifth Organization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic Syndromes, Yusuf S, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, Afzal R, Pogue J, et al. Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med (2006) 354:1464–76. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa055443
29. Turpie A, Bauer K, Eriksson B, Lassen M, Steering Committees of the Pentasaccharide Orthopedic Prophylaxis. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux in major orthopedic surgery according to the timing of its first administration. Thromb Haemost (2003) 90:364–6. doi:10.1267/THRO03020364
30. Lassen MR, Ageno W, Borris LC, Lieberman JR, Rosencher N, Bandel TJ, et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med (2008) 358:2776–86. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa076016
34. Lassen MR, Raskob GE, Gallus A, Pineo G, Chen D, Hornick P, et al. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement (ADVANCE-2): a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet (2010) 375:807–15. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62125-5
35. Organisation to Assess Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes (OASIS-2) Investigators. Effects of recombinant hirudin (lepirudin) compared with heparin on death, myocardial infarction, refractory angina, and revascularisation procedures in patients with acute myocardial ischaemia without ST elevation: a randomised trial. Lancet (1999) 353:429–38.
36. Stone GW, White HD, Ohman EM, Bertrand ME, Lincoff AM, Mclaurin BT, et al. Bivalirudin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a subgroup analysis from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategy (ACUITY) trial. Lancet (2007) 369:907–19. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60450-4
37. Wallentin L, Yusuf S, Ezekowitz MD, Alings M, Flather M, Franzosi MG, et al. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of international normalised ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the RE-LY trial. Lancet (2010) 376:975–83. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61194-4
38. Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK, Schellong S, Eriksson H, Baanstra D, et al. Extended use of dabigatran, warfarin, or placebo in venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med (2013) 368:709–18. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1113697
39. Schulman S, Kakkar AK, Goldhaber SZ, Schellong S, Eriksson H, Mismetti P, et al. Treatment of acute venous thromboembolism with dabigatran or warfarin and pooled analysis. Circulation (2014) 129:764–72. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004450
41. Ly B, Arnesen H, Eie H, Hol R. A controlled clinical trial of streptokinase and heparin in the treatment of major pulmonary embolism. Acta Med Scand (1978) 203:465–70. doi:10.1111/j.0954-6820.1978.tb14909.x
43. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med (1995) 333:1581–7. doi:10.1056/NEJM199512143332401
45. Van De Werf F, Adgey J, Ardissino D, Armstrong PW, Aylward P, Barbash G, et al. Single-bolus tenecteplase compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT-2 double-blind randomised trial. Lancet (1999) 354:716–22. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)07403-6
46. Ridker PM, Goldhaber SZ, Danielson E, Rosenberg Y, Eby CS, Deitcher SR, et al. Long-term, low-intensity warfarin therapy for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med (2003) 348:1425–34. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa035029
47. Romualdi E, Donadini MP, Ageno W. Oral rivaroxaban after symptomatic venous thromboembolism: the continued treatment study (EINSTEIN-extension study). Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther (2011) 9:841–4. doi:10.1586/erc.11.62
49. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, Genest J, Gotto AM Jr., Kastelein JJ, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med (2008) 359:2195–207. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0807646
51. Ignarro LJ, Buga GM, Wood KS, Byrns RE, Chaudhuri G. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor produced and released from artery and vein is nitric oxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1987) 84:9265–9. doi:10.1073/pnas.84.24.9265
57. Sorensen HT, Horvath-Puho E, Pedersen L, Baron JA, Prandoni P. Venous thromboembolism and subsequent hospitalisation due to acute arterial cardiovascular events: a 20-year cohort study. Lancet (2007) 370:1773–9. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61745-0
58. Kucher N, Boekstegers P, Muller OJ, Kupatt C, Beyer-Westendorf J, Heitzer T, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. Circulation (2014) 129:479–86. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005544
59. Sugimura K, Fukumoto Y, Satoh K, Nochioka K, Miura Y, Aoki T, et al. Percutaneous transluminal pulmonary angioplasty markedly improves pulmonary hemodynamics and long-term prognosis in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Circ J (2012) 76:485–8. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-11-1217
60. Kataoka M, Inami T, Hayashida K, Shimura N, Ishiguro H, Abe T, et al. Percutaneous transluminal pulmonary angioplasty for the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Interv (2012) 5:756–62. doi:10.1161/circinterventions.112.971390
61. Fukui S, Ogo T, Morita Y, Tsuji A, Tateishi E, Ozaki K, et al. Right ventricular reverse remodelling after balloon pulmonary angioplasty. Eur Respir J (2014) 43:1394–402. doi:10.1183/09031936.00012914
62. Mizoguchi H, Ogawa A, Munemasa M, Mikouchi H, Ito H, Matsubara H. Refined balloon pulmonary angioplasty for inoperable patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Interv (2012) 5:748–55. doi:10.1161/circinterventions.112.971077
Keywords: thrombosis, vascular biology, myocardial infarction, stroke, venous thromboembolism
Citation: Lang IM (2014) Thrombosis – besieged but poorly understood. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 1:4. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2014.00004
Received: 24 June 2014; Accepted: 04 August 2014;
Published online: 18 August 2014.
Edited by:Matthias Barton, University of Zurich, Switzerland
Reviewed by:Burak Pamukcu, Erdem Hospital, Turkey
Ingo Ahrens, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg Bad Krozingen, Germany
Copyright: © 2014 Lang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.