SPECIALTY GRAND CHALLENGE article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med., 18 August 2014

Sec. Atherosclerosis and Vascular Medicine

Volume 1 - 2014 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2014.00004

Thrombosis – Besieged but Poorly Understood

  • Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

In biology, thrombosis is a mechanism of maintaining the integrity of biological surfaces in higher mammals, limiting fluid loss, and facilitating the recognition, containment, and destruction of pathogens and foreign materials by a scaffold of fibrin and DNA strands. However, thrombosis may also lead to vascular occlusion and subsequent tissue damage.

In medicine, thrombosis is a hallmark of life-threatening cardiovascular diseases, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, or venous thromboembolism representing major causes of death in the Western civilization. Every year 17 million individuals die from cardiovascular disease (1, 2), comprising almost half of the global death toll in Europe. For example, in Austria, 34,000 patients suffered a cardiovascular death in 2012, accounting for 42.7% of all deaths, which is 1.7-fold the death toll of malignant diseases (3).

Cardiovascular science beyond clinical observation and anatomical dissection emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. A key observation was the epidemiological connection of hypertension and elevated plasma lipids with atherosclerotic vascular disease (4). Based on a more profound understanding of these risk factors, including exercise, body weight, and glucose metabolism, preventive measures were tested, leading to both primary and secondary preventions that have become powerful modulators of disease decreasing events by almost half. Since then, the establishment of coronary care units, cardiac catheterization, angioplasty, and surgery and the advent of modern medications many of which interfere with thrombosis and platelet aggregation, have contributed to fundamental improvements in cardiovascular care. However, much of the advances in cardiovascular science have been in the thrombosis field, stimulated by the discovery that myocardial infarction was due to thrombi in the coronary arteries (5). Traditionally, thrombosis has been viewed as the biochemical result of regulated cascades of protein interactions characterized by the activation of factor X and the activation of thrombin, resulting in the formation of fibrin. Accordingly, treatments for myocardial infarction, stroke, and venous thromboembolism have targeted pathways or more recently, individual protein moieties (Figure 1). Table 1 summarizes landmark trials leading to the approval of individual compounds. Over 50 years, a plethora of treatments has been brought to market (Table 1), with high efficacy and safety profiles that have contributed to the observation that death rates per 100,000 population were decreased from 450 in the 1950s to 150 around 2010 (6). For example, while 20–30% of hospitalized patients with myocardial infarction died within 30 days due to their underlying disease, this number has been substantially decreased to <5% most recently (7).

Figure 1

Table 1

ConceptMechanism of actionCompound (key reference)IndicationBenefits/Harms
Antiplatelet drugsCOX inhibitionAcetylsalicylic acid/Aspirin (8)Prevention of cardiovascular eventsIncreased risk of bleeding when combined with NSAIDs
ADP receptor/P2Y12 inhibitionClopidogrel (9)Prevention of thrombotic eventsPro-drug limited by metabolization, irreversible
Clopidogrel (10)ACSPro-drug limited by metabolization, irreversible
Prasugrel (11, 12)Prevention of thrombotic eventsRapid onset of action, high efficacy, particularly in diabetic subjects, increased bleeding rates in those aged >75 years, and in those with previous stroke and a weight less than 60 kg, irreversible
Ticagrelor (13)Prevention of thrombotic events particularly in STE-ACSRapid onset of action, reversible, high efficacy, low bleeding rates, provides a survival benefit in ACS
Phosphodiesterase inhibitionCilostazol (14)Reduction of symptoms of intermittent claudicationPhosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor, potentially dangerous in severe heart failure
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitionAbciximab (15, 16)For use in individuals undergoing PCI with or without stent placement to decrease the incidence of ischemic complications due to the procedureEffective prevention of ischemic events, particularly in diabetic subjects, and subjects with chronic kidney disease, increased bleeding rates only in high-risk patients
Tirofiban (17)Reduction of the rate of thrombotic cardiovascular events (combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or refractory ischemia/repeat cardiac procedure) in patients with NSTE-ACSRapid onset and short duration of action (4–8 h)
Eptifibatide (18)Reduction of the risk of acute cardiac ischemic events (death and/or myocardial infarction) in patients with UA or NSTE-ACS both in patients who are to receive medical treatment and those undergoing PCIShort half-life
AnticoagulantsVitamin K antagonismVitamin K antagonists (19)Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation, mechanical and bioprosthetic heart valves, post-myocardial infarction, recurrent systemic embolism and other indicationsAccepted standard, reproducible results, high exposure rates, cheap, no contraindication in patients with GFR <30 mL/min
Factor Xa inhibitionUnfractionated heparin (2023) new ESC Guidelines pending 2014Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with renal failureHIT possible
Low-molecular weight heparins, e.g., enoxaparin (23, 24)Prevention of DVT in hip or knee replacement surgery, or in abdominal surgery or acutely ill patients with severely restricted mobility at risk for thromboembolismAccumulates in chronic renal failure
Low-molecular weight heparins, e.g., enoxaparin (25, 26)Prevention of ischemic complications of UA and NSTE-ACS. STE-ACS managed medically or with subsequent PCIAccumulates in chronic renal failure
Low-molecular weight heparins, e.g., enoxaparin (27)Acute pulmonary embolismAccumulates in chronic renal failure
Fondaparinux (28)ACSPositive effect on survival, thrombus formation on wires/balloons during (primary) PCI if no additional heparin is used, contraindicated in severe renal failure with a GFR <20 mL/min
Fondaparinux (29)Prophylaxis of DVT in patients undergoing hip facture surgery, hip replacement surgery and knee replacement surgery.50% VTE risk reduction compared with enoxaparin, no increase in clinically relevant bleeding Contraindicated in severe renal failure with a GFR <20 mL/min
Rivaroxaban (30)VTE prophylaxisEasy administration, once daily, more effective compared with enoxaparin, same safety profile
Rivaroxaban (31)Non-valvular atrial fibrillationNon-inferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism, same risk of major bleeding, however, less intracranial and fatal
Rivaroxaban (32)Reduction of the risk of recurrent atherothrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromesLess cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke, but increased risk of major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage, but not fatal bleeding
Apixaban (33)Non-valvular atrial fibrillationCompared with warfarin less ischemic strokes
Apixaban (34)VTE prophylaxisSuperior to enoxaparin in preventing thrombosis
Direct thrombin (II) inhibitionLepirudin (35)ACSLow exposure rates, little information
Bivalirudin (36)ACSSurvival benefit, however, signal of increased early stent thrombosis
Dabigatran (37), http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm396470.htmReduction of risk of stroke and systemic embolism in Non-valvular atrial fibrillationCompared with warfarin less hemorrhagic strokes, mild increase of GI bleeds, antibody-based antidote in development
Dabigatran (38)Reduction of the risk of recurrence of DVT and pulmonary embolismCompared with warfarin less hemorrhagic strokes, mild increase of GI bleeds, antibody-based antidote in development
Dabigatran (39)Treatment of DVT and pulmonary embolismCompared with warfarin less hemorrhagic strokes, mild increase of GI bleeds, antibody-based antidote in development
Argatroban (40)Prophylaxis or treatment of thrombosis in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; including patients undergoing PCILow exposure rates, low case numbers
Thrombolytic drugs/fibrinolyticsStreptokinase (41)Acute pulmonary embolismRelatively low fibrin specificity, inexpensive
Streptokinase (42)Acute coronary syndromeRelatively low fibrin specificity, inexpensive
Alteplase (43)Acute ischemic strokeRecombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator with improved fibrin binding
Reteplase (44)Acute coronary syndromelonger half-life, better penetration into thrombus
Tenecteplase (45)Reduction of mortality associated with acute myocardial infarctionhigher fibrin specificity and greater resistance to inactivation by its endogenous inhibitor (PAI-1) compared to native t-PA

Overview of treatments approved for vascular thrombosis (antithrombotics, comprising thrombolytics, anticoagulants, and antiplatelet drugs).

Selected references and selected indications are displayed. COX = cyclo-oxygenase, NSAID = non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, kg = kilograms, ACS = acute coronary syndrome, PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention, UA = unstable angina, STE-ACS = ST elevation acute coronary syndrome, NSTE-ACS = non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome, GFR = glomerular filtration rate, HIT = heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, ACS = acute coronary syndromes, DVT = deep venous thrombosis, VTE = venous thromboembolism, GI = gastro-intestinal, PAI-1 = plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1, t-PA = tissue-type plasminogen activator.

The public domain is thrilled with advances of cardiovascular medicine, and needs for deeper insights are hardly convincing in an environment of harmonized health care providing infarction networks, stent-for-life programs, and generally high standard guidelines in cardiovascular care.

However, do we understand thrombosis, do we understand recurrence, or do we prefer, for example, to mandate life-long factor X inhibition (38, 4648) and statins (49) in patients at risk, without further investigation of underlying mechanisms?

More recently, a new view of thrombosis has emerged accounting for thrombosis as a vascular disease involving the dynamic interaction between platelets, circulating inflammatory cells, nucleic acids and proteins, and resident cells of the vascular wall. Milestones along the way of integrating the vessel wall in the thrombotic process were the discovery and action of nitric oxide (50, 51), the delineation of the LDL-cholesterol pathway (52, 53), the role of soluble and membrane bound tissue factor in atherosclerosis (54), and most recently the concept of “immunothrombosis” (55), linking inflammation and thrombosis as regulators of vascular integrity. Consequently, it was understood that the hemostatic system is a modulator of atherosclerosis (56). Thrombosis comprises both acute clotting and the more time-consuming process of thrombus resolution, which represents a vascular remodeling process that is driven by inflammation, angiogenesis, and cells of the innate immune system. A stimulus leading to thrombus formation induces an innate immune response that is supported by neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, by specific thrombosis-related molecules, and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETS), underpinning the importance of the following questions:

Is thrombosis the underlying process behind both arterial and venous disease that oftentimes combines in individual patients? (57) Do we understand endothelial dysfunction, and is it the nidus for thrombosis, and eventually vascular occlusion? And why do acute pulmonary emboli transform into chronic vascular obstructions in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension? Do we understand acute vascular syndromes simply by plaque rupture that is driven by macrophages that are loaded with lipids, and proteolytically cleave a thin-cap fibroatheroma thus triggering platelet activation? Does that concept explain acute coronary syndromes in young subjects without significant vascular stenoses? Is thrombosis per se the trigger for all vascular occlusion, be it chronic or acute? Is vascular occlusion the sequlae of deficient efferocytosis, and are those mechanisms driven by a deficiency of natural antibodies? What are the recognition sites for natural antibodies in the circulation? Which cells or cell fragments in the circulation are carrying oxidation specific epitopes, e.g., oxidized low-density lipoprotein (OxLDL) or malon-dialdehyde, and how do they function as danger associated molecular patterns? What is the role of nucleic acids, RNAse, and DNAse in thrombosis? Is NETting a preventable amplifier of acute thrombosis and the adverse vascular remodeling following thrombosis?

Are there potential therapeutic targets, upstream of mechanisms of thrombosis that might be applied without any potential bleeding risk? And might addressing those new targets prevent recurrence? Will we be able to identify a cellular program to minimize the potential of thrombosis and vascular occlusion? Will we be restoring normal Ca2+ cycling and reduce reperfusion injury? Will we be utilizing therapeutic antagomirs to control cellular responses to vascular injury? Will we be engineering vessels and vascular compartments of organ systems?

While bench-top research will address these questions, clinical research will complement advances both in drug-based trials and in interventional approaches. Since the PEITHO trial, the term of acute pulmonary revascularization has been coined in analogy to coronary revascularization, leading the way to interventional treatments (58) as adjunct or stand-alone treatments for the pulmonary circulation. Similar developments have recently been initiated in chronic pulmonary vascular disease and will change treatment paradigms (5962).

Taken together, thrombosis is an important mediator of vascular disease, but cannot be seen in isolation. Data suggest that it most often occurs as the consequence of a loss of vascular barrier function, for example, in the context of inflammation and rarely as a primary event. To comprehend mechanisms of vascular barrier function is another challenge of thrombosis research of the future. To understand thrombosis, we need to look beyond thrombosis.

Statements

Conflict of interest

Irene M. Lang has relationships with drug companies including AOPOrphan Pharmaceuticals, Abbott, Actelion, Astra-Zeneca, Bayer-Schering, Cordis, Glaxo Smith Kline, Medtronic, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, and United Therapeutics. In addition to being investigator in trials involving these companies, relationships include consultancy service, research grants, and membership of scientific advisory boards.

References

  • 1

    MurrayCJLopezAD. Measuring the global burden of disease. N Engl J Med (2013) 369:44857.10.1056/NEJMra1201534

  • 2

    LaslettLJAlagonaPJr.ClarkBAIIIDrozdaJPJr.SaldivarFWilsonSRet alThe worldwide environment of cardiovascular disease: prevalence, diagnosis, therapy, and policy issues: a report from the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol (2012) 60:S149.10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.002

  • 3

    SchneiderB. Statistik Austria 2012. Österreichische Ärztezeitung (2013):10.3109/02699052.2014.904522

  • 4

    KannelWBDawberTRKaganARevotskieNStokesJIII. Factors of risk in the development of coronary heart disease – six year follow-up experience. The Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med (1961) 55:3350.10.7326/0003-4819-55-1-33

  • 5

    HektoenL. Embolism of the left coronary artery; sudden death. Med Newsl (London) (1892) 61:210.

  • 6

    NabelEGBraunwaldE. A tale of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med (2012) 366:5463.10.1056/NEJMra1112570

  • 7

    KallaKChristGKarnikRMalzerRNormanGPracharHet alImplementation of guidelines improves the standard of care: the Viennese registry on reperfusion strategies in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (Vienna STEMI registry). Circulation (2006) 113:2398405.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.586198

  • 8

    LewisHDJr.DavisJWArchibaldDGSteinkeWESmithermanTCDohertyJEIIIet alProtective effects of aspirin against acute myocardial infarction and death in men with unstable angina. Results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. N Engl J Med (1983) 309:396403.10.1056/NEJM198308183090703

  • 9

    CommitteeCS. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet (1996) 348:132939.10.1016/S0140-6736(96)09457-3

  • 10

    YusufSZhaoFMehtaSRChrolaviciusSTognoniGFoxKKet alEffects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med (2001) 345:494502.10.1056/NEJMoa010746

  • 11

    MontalescotGWiviottSDBraunwaldEMurphySAGibsonCMMccabeCHet alPrasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (2009) 373:72331.10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60441-4

  • 12

    WiviottSDBraunwaldEAngiolilloDJMeiselSDalbyAJVerheugtFWet alGreater clinical benefit of more intensive oral antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel in patients with diabetes mellitus in the trial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38. Circulation (2008) 118:162636.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.791061

  • 13

    WallentinLBeckerRCBudajACannonCPEmanuelssonHHeldCet alTicagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med (2009) 361:104557.10.1056/NEJMoa0904327

  • 14

    StevensJWSimpsonEHarnanSSquiresHMengYThomasSet alSystematic review of the efficacy of cilostazol, naftidrofuryl oxalate and pentoxifylline for the treatment of intermittent claudication. Br J Surg (2012) 99:16308.10.1002/bjs.8895

  • 15

    LefkovitsJIvanhoeRJCaliffRMBergelsonBAAndersonKMStonerGLet alEffects of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade by a chimeric monoclonal antibody (abciximab) on acute and six-month outcomes after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. EPIC investigators. Am J Cardiol (1996) 77:104551.10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00128-2

  • 16

    StoneGWMaeharaAWitzenbichlerBGodlewskiJPariseHDambrinkJHet alIntracoronary abciximab and aspiration thrombectomy in patients with large anterior myocardial infarction: the INFUSE-AMI randomized trial. JAMA (2012) 307:181726.10.1001/jama.2012.421

  • 17

    Van’t HofAWTen BergJHeestermansTDillTFunckRCVan WerkumWet alPrehospital initiation of tirofiban in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty (On-TIME 2): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (2008) 372:53746.10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61235-0

  • 18

    O’sheaJCHafleyGEGreenbergSHasselbladVLorenzTJKittMMet alPlatelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin blockade with eptifibatide in coronary stent intervention: the ESPRIT trial: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA (2001) 285:246873.10.1001/jama.285.19.2468

  • 19

    AnsellJHirshJPollerLBusseyHJacobsonAHylekE. The pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest (2004) 126:204S33S.10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.204S

  • 20

    BestCHBauerG. Heparin and thrombosis: Harvey lecture, November 28, 1940. Bull N Y Acad Med (1941) 17:796817.

  • 21

    BauerG. Thrombosis; early diagnosis and abortive treatment with heparin. Lancet (1946) 247:44754.10.1016/S0140-6736(46)91429-8

  • 22

    TorbickiAPerrierAKonstantinidesSAgnelliGGalieNPruszczykPet alGuidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J (2008) 29:2276315.10.1093/eurheartj/ehn310

  • 23

    HolbrookASchulmanSWittDMVandvikPOFishJKovacsMJet alEvidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest (2012) 141:152S84S.10.1378/chest.11-2295

  • 24

    ENOXACAN Study Group. Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for prevention of deep vein thrombosis in elective cancer surgery: a double-blind randomized multicentre trial with venographic assessment. Br J Surg (1997) 84:1099103.10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.d01-3882.x

  • 25

    HammCWBassandJPAgewallSBaxJBoersmaEBuenoHet alESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J (2011) 32:29993054.10.1093/eurheartj/ehr236

  • 26

    Task ForceMMontalescotGSechtemUAchenbachSAndreottiFArdenCet al2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J (2013) 34:29493003.10.1093/eurheartj/eht296

  • 27

    SimonneauGSorsHCharbonnierBPageYLaabanJPAzarianRet alA comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for acute pulmonary embolism. The THESEE Study Group. Tinzaparine ou Heparine Standard: Evaluations dans l’Embolie Pulmonaire. N Engl J Med (1997) 337:6639.10.1056/NEJM199709043371002

  • 28

    Fifth Organization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic SyndromesYusufSMehtaSRChrolaviciusSAfzalRPogueJet alComparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med (2006) 354:146476.10.1056/NEJMoa055443

  • 29

    TurpieABauerKErikssonBLassenMSteering Committees of the Pentasaccharide Orthopedic Prophylaxis. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux in major orthopedic surgery according to the timing of its first administration. Thromb Haemost (2003) 90:3646.10.1267/THRO03020364

  • 30

    LassenMRAgenoWBorrisLCLiebermanJRRosencherNBandelTJet alRivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med (2008) 358:277686.10.1056/NEJMoa076016

  • 31

    PatelMRMahaffeyKWGargJPanGSingerDEHackeWet alRivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med (2011) 365:88391.10.1056/NEJMoa1009638

  • 32

    MegaJLBraunwaldEWiviottSDBassandJ-PBhattDLBodeCet alRivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med (2012) 366:919.10.1056/NEJMoa1112277

  • 33

    GrangerCBAlexanderJHMcmurrayJJLopesRDHylekEMHannaMet alApixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med (2011) 365:98192.10.1056/NEJMoa1107039

  • 34

    LassenMRRaskobGEGallusAPineoGChenDHornickPet alApixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement (ADVANCE-2): a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet (2010) 375:80715.10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62125-5

  • 35

    Organisation to Assess Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes (OASIS-2) Investigators. Effects of recombinant hirudin (lepirudin) compared with heparin on death, myocardial infarction, refractory angina, and revascularisation procedures in patients with acute myocardial ischaemia without ST elevation: a randomised trial. Lancet (1999) 353:42938.

  • 36

    StoneGWWhiteHDOhmanEMBertrandMELincoffAMMclaurinBTet alBivalirudin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a subgroup analysis from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategy (ACUITY) trial. Lancet (2007) 369:90719.10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60450-4

  • 37

    WallentinLYusufSEzekowitzMDAlingsMFlatherMFranzosiMGet alEfficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of international normalised ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the RE-LY trial. Lancet (2010) 376:97583.10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61194-4

  • 38

    SchulmanSKearonCKakkarAKSchellongSErikssonHBaanstraDet alExtended use of dabigatran, warfarin, or placebo in venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med (2013) 368:70918.10.1056/NEJMoa1113697

  • 39

    SchulmanSKakkarAKGoldhaberSZSchellongSErikssonHMismettiPet alTreatment of acute venous thromboembolism with dabigatran or warfarin and pooled analysis. Circulation (2014) 129:76472.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004450

  • 40

    DasararajuRSinghNMehtaA. Heparin induced thrombocytopenia: review. Expert Rev Hematol (2013) 6:41928.10.1586/17474086.2013.814446

  • 41

    LyBArnesenHEieHHolR. A controlled clinical trial of streptokinase and heparin in the treatment of major pulmonary embolism. Acta Med Scand (1978) 203:46570.10.1111/j.0954-6820.1978.tb14909.x

  • 42

    Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet (1986) 1:397402.

  • 43

    The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med (1995) 333:15817.10.1056/NEJM199512143332401

  • 44

    WeaverWD. Results of the RAPID 1 and RAPID 2 thrombolytic trials in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J (1996) 17(Suppl E):1420.10.1093/eurheartj/17.suppl_E.14

  • 45

    Van De WerfFAdgeyJArdissinoDArmstrongPWAylwardPBarbashGet alSingle-bolus tenecteplase compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT-2 double-blind randomised trial. Lancet (1999) 354:71622.10.1016/S0140-6736(99)07403-6

  • 46

    RidkerPMGoldhaberSZDanielsonERosenbergYEbyCSDeitcherSRet alLong-term, low-intensity warfarin therapy for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med (2003) 348:142534.10.1056/NEJMoa035029

  • 47

    RomualdiEDonadiniMPAgenoW. Oral rivaroxaban after symptomatic venous thromboembolism: the continued treatment study (EINSTEIN-extension study). Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther (2011) 9:8414.10.1586/erc.11.62

  • 48

    AgnelliGBullerHRCohenACurtoMGallusASJohnsonMet alApixaban for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med (2013) 368:699708.10.1056/NEJMoa1207541

  • 49

    RidkerPMDanielsonEFonsecaFAGenestJGottoAMJr.KasteleinJJet alRosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med (2008) 359:2195207.10.1056/NEJMoa0807646

  • 50

    FurchgottRFZawadzkiJV. The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine. Nature (1980) 288:3736.10.1038/288373a0

  • 51

    IgnarroLJBugaGMWoodKSByrnsREChaudhuriG. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor produced and released from artery and vein is nitric oxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1987) 84:92659.10.1073/pnas.84.24.9265

  • 52

    GoldsteinJLBrownMS. The LDL receptor. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol (2009) 29:4318.10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179564

  • 53

    BrownMSGoldsteinJL. A receptor-mediated pathway for cholesterol homeostasis. Science (1986) 232:3447.10.1126/science.3513311

  • 54

    NemersonY. A different view of thrombosis. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis (2000) 11(Suppl 1):S12.10.1097/00001721-200004001-00001

  • 55

    EngelmannBMassbergS. Thrombosis as an intravascular effector of innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol (2013) 13:3445.10.1038/nri3345

  • 56

    BorissoffJISpronkHMTen CateH. The hemostatic system as a modulator of atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med (2011) 364:174660.10.1056/NEJMra1011670

  • 57

    SorensenHTHorvath-PuhoEPedersenLBaronJAPrandoniP. Venous thromboembolism and subsequent hospitalisation due to acute arterial cardiovascular events: a 20-year cohort study. Lancet (2007) 370:17739.10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61745-0

  • 58

    KucherNBoekstegersPMullerOJKupattCBeyer-WestendorfJHeitzerTet alRandomized, controlled trial of ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. Circulation (2014) 129:47986.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005544

  • 59

    SugimuraKFukumotoYSatohKNochiokaKMiuraYAokiTet alPercutaneous transluminal pulmonary angioplasty markedly improves pulmonary hemodynamics and long-term prognosis in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Circ J (2012) 76:4858.10.1253/circj.CJ-11-1217

  • 60

    KataokaMInamiTHayashidaKShimuraNIshiguroHAbeTet alPercutaneous transluminal pulmonary angioplasty for the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Interv (2012) 5:75662.10.1161/circinterventions.112.971390

  • 61

    FukuiSOgoTMoritaYTsujiATateishiEOzakiKet alRight ventricular reverse remodelling after balloon pulmonary angioplasty. Eur Respir J (2014) 43:1394402.10.1183/09031936.00012914

  • 62

    MizoguchiHOgawaAMunemasaMMikouchiHItoHMatsubaraH. Refined balloon pulmonary angioplasty for inoperable patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Interv (2012) 5:74855.10.1161/circinterventions.112.971077

Summary

Keywords

thrombosis, vascular biology, myocardial infarction, stroke, venous thromboembolism

Citation

Lang IM (2014) Thrombosis – Besieged but Poorly Understood. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 1:4. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2014.00004

Received

24 June 2014

Accepted

04 August 2014

Published

18 August 2014

Volume

1 - 2014

Edited by

Matthias Barton, University of Zurich, Switzerland

Reviewed by

Burak Pamukcu, Erdem Hospital, Turkey; Ingo Ahrens, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg Bad Krozingen, Germany

Copyright

*Correspondence:

This article was submitted to Thrombosis, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics