Cardiomyocytes and Macrophages Discourse on the Method to Govern Cardiac Repair
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMRS-970, Paris Centre de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
In response to pathophysiological stress, the cardiac tissue undergoes profound remodeling process that incorporates the elimination of dying resident cells, compensatory hypertrophy of functional cardiomyocytes, growth and remodeling of the vascular compartment and formation of a fibrotic scar. Accumulating evidences indicate that cardiac remodeling is, at least in part, controlled by a complex crosstalk between cardiomyocytes and macrophages. The strategic location of abundant macrophages to the proximity of cardiomyocytes suggest that they could regulate the fate of cardiomyocytes in the injured heart. As such, macrophages appear as critical support cells for cardiomyocytes and play central roles in cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis and remodeling. Notably, the cardiac tissue expands heterogeneous population of cardiac macrophages through local proliferation of resident macrophage as well as recruitment and differentiation of blood-derived monocytes. It has also been suggested that cardiac-resident macrophages display distinct functional properties from that of monocyte-derived macrophages in cardiac tissue. Furthermore, macrophages are an overflowing source of biological entities with non-canonical roles on cardiac conduction or cardiomyocyte proliferation by regulating action potential diffusion or cardiac cell cycle reentry. Alternatively, stressed cardiomyocytes can trigger the release of a broad repertoire of instructive signals that can regulate macrophage number, skew their phenotype and therefore direct their beneficial or deleterious actions. In this review, we highlight recent discoveries describing how the intricate dialogue between cardiomyocytes and macrophages can shape the deleterious or healing signaling mechanisms in the injured cardiac tissue.
Pathological conditions (hypertension, heart valve disease, myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy) result in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and cardiac remodeling progression associated with systolic and diastolic dysfunction. This adverse ventricular remodeling precipitates the occurrence of heart failure, arrhythmia, or sudden death. Hypoxia, neuro-humoral activation, and mechanical stress initiate multiple signaling pathways leading to cardiomyocyte death and hypertrophic growth of surviving cardiomyocytes. Nevertheless, the heart also entails different types of non-myocyte cells, including vascular cells, fibroblasts and inflammatory cells. Notably, emerging evidences indicate that cardiac remodeling is regulated by direct and indirect communications between cardiomyocytes and inflammatory cells. In response to pathophysiological stress, the abundance of inflammatory cells and particularly, that of macrophages, and their proximity to cardiomyocytes, position them to critically regulate cardiomyocyte homeostasis in the injured heart. As such, macrophages appear as critical support cells for cardiomyocytes and play central roles in cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis and remodeling. In this review, we highlight recent advances, mainly related to experimental observations, in our understanding of the decisive interaction between macrophages and cardiomyocytes.
Origin of Cardiac Macrophages
During early gestation, around embryonic day 7, primitive hematopoiesis occurs and macrophages expand in the extra-embryonic yolk sac. Subsequently, erythromyeloid precursors emerge from the yolk sac, and generate fetal macrophages. The onset of vascularization is associated with erythromyeloid precursors migration to the fetal liver. Concomitantly, hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) arise from the aorta-gonad-mesonephros and migrate to the fetal liver. In the perinatal period, bone marrow serves as a major reservoir of HSCs and synthesizes the complete repertoire of immune cells (1).
The development of genetic fate-mapping techniques allows to classify and track distinct macrophage subsets, and when associated with parabiotic and adoptive-transplant studies, permits to discern the origin of tissue macrophages. Using this combination of methods, it has become obvious that most of cardiac macrophages derives from precursor of embryonic origin, but not from circulating monocytes after birth (2). Murine cardiac macrophages (CD45+CD11b+F4/80+CD64+ or CD68+) are further categorized by expression of CCR2 (C-C chemokine receptor type 2), MHC-II (major histocompatibility complex II), and the lymphocyte antigen 6 complex (Ly6C). High and low expression of Ly6C can be used to discriminate inflammatory and reparative macrophages but the use of both CCR2 and MHC-II is useful to distinguish three separate and discrete cardiac macrophages pools from different origins. In steady state, the adult heart contained two resident macrophages subsets, MHC-IIlowCCR2− and MHC–IIhighCCR2− cells. These macrophages are separate from the blood monocyte pool and originate mainly from yolk sac- and fetal liver- embryonic progenitors (2, 3). The third macrophage pool expresses CCR2 (MHC-IIhighCCR2+) but is smaller numerically and is derived entirely from blood monocytes (2, 3). In the steady state, tissue-resident macrophages constitute the main subset of cardiac macrophages and are preserved through tissue proliferation (2). Nevertheless, it has been suggested that self-renewal of cardiac-resident macrophages declines with aging and that a substantial pool of cardiac resident macrophages is replenished by monocyte-derived macrophages, even in the lack of pathological triggers and inflammation (4). Indeed, using alternative gating strategy based on MHC-II and CX3CR1 expression, it has been shown that the proliferation capacity of embryo-derived cardiac macrophages is progressively reduced from the peri-natal period (4).
Of note, comprehensive transcriptional analysis of resident macrophages suggests that resident macrophages isolated from various organs are transcriptionally different from each other (5, 6). It is therefore likely that the tissue niche provides instructive signals coordinating macrophage phenotype and that the cardiac environment shapes the gene repertoire and controls macrophage-related functions. Furthermore, alteration of this cardiac niche is expected to affect the transcriptional network of cardiac macrophages resulting in a continuum of polarization states in the pathological heart.
Physiological and pathological settings adjust the number of each cardiac macrophage pools. Macrophage number could depend on local expansion of resident macrophage or recruitment and differentiation of blood-derived monocytes. In the absence of circulating monocytes, such as in CCR2 deficient mice, resident cells can repopulate the pool of cardiac macrophages. After transient depletion of macrophages with clodronate liposomes, circulating monocytes infiltrate the myocardium and are able to differentiate into long lasting populations of cardiac macrophages. Furthermore, CCR2– macrophages disappeared after a cardiac insult and blood monocytes fully replenish heart macrophages (2, 7). Hence, after a cardiac insult, it is likely that bone marrow-derived monocyte populations represent the major cardiac macrophage substitute. Notably, in the bone marrow, a CCR2+CD150+CD48− Lineage−Sca-1+c-Kit+ hematopoietic subset has been identified as the main precursor of myeloid cells after ischemic insult (8). The cardiac tissue produces mobilizing factors such as granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor or CCL (CC motif chemokine ligand)2 and CCL7 that act distally to foster monocyte mobilization from the bone marrow to the blood (9–11). Bone marrow-derived HSCs lead to the emergence of two principle monocyte subsets depicted by the expression Ly6C. Classical Ly6Chigh monocytes appear to originate from Ly6C+ monocyte progenitors, and non-classical Ly6clow monocytes, which likely differentiate from Ly6Chigh monocytes, through a Nr4a1-dependent transcriptional program (12–14). Bone marrow derived Ly6C monocytes are recruited into the injured cardiac tissue and differentiate to macrophages. In addition to the bone marrow, the spleen also acts as a reservoir for Ly6Chigh monocytes and participates to cardiac macrophage repopulation [(15); Figure 1]. One can also speculate that additional compartment could participate to the inflammatory cell influx within the cardiac tissue. In this line of reasoning, the pericardial adipose tissue has been shown to contain a high density of lymphoid clusters (16). The white adipose tissue has also been identified as a reservoir of mast cell progenitors, that do not originate from the bone marrow, and are able to home to cardiac tissue through a stem cell factor dependent signaling (17). The putative contribution of adipose tissue to the monocyte and/or macrophage pool remains to be defined. Altogether, these results indicate that, following the disruption of homeostasis; multiple complementary pathways could participate to the dynamic regulation of the heterogeneous population of cardiac resident macrophages.
Figure 1. Life cycle of macrophages during cardiac stress. In pathological settings, the stressed cardiac tissue sends mobilizing factors to monocyte reservoirs including bone marrow and spleen, leading to the emergence of two principle monocyte subsets depicted by the expression of Ly6C (Ly6C High or Low). Circulating Ly6C positive monocytes are then recruited into the injured cardiac tissue and differentiate to macrophages. Local proliferation of cardiac resident macrophages also participates to the expansion of cardiac macrophage population. Cardiac-resident macrophages and monocyte-derived macrophages are expected to display distinct functional properties precipitating or preventing adverse ventricular remodeling. CSF, colony-stimulating factors; GM-CSF, granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor; EVs, extracellular vesicles.
In macrophage-depleted mice, infarct healing is impaired, and myocardial rupture occurs suggesting a net beneficial role of the heterogeneous population of cardiac macrophages in cardiac repair (18–20). Resident macrophages are expected to display functional properties distinct from that of monocyte-derived macrophages. Transcriptional analysis revealed that monocyte-derived macrophages synchronize cardiac inflammation, but are less efficient in antigen processing and clearance of dying cells (2). In particular, CCR2+ macrophages contain distinct components of the NLRP3 inflammasome and are instrumental in IL-1β release (2). On the same note, chemoattractants CXCL (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand)2 and CXCL5 produced by CCR2+ resident macrophages have been shown to specifically contribute to the initial neutrophil extravasation into the ischemic area (21). Inhibition of monocyte and monocyte-derived macrophage recruitment improves outcome after acute MI and myocardial infarction-induced heart failure. Conversely, cardiac-resident macrophages (MHC-IIlowCCR2− and MHC-IIhighCCR2−) seem to display robust proangiogenic and mitogenic properties, suggesting a reparative potential for these macrophage subsets [(22); Figure 1].
Nevertheless, it must be acknowledged that there is no consensus to harmonize the phenotypic classification of macrophages, which induces uncertainty in the characterization as well as function of the distinct sub-populations of cardiac macrophages. An ambiguity amplified by the use of enzymatic digestion methods designed to isolate cardiac inflammatory cells that alter the levels of cell-surface markers and by the shared expression of some markers such as CD11b, Ly6C or F4/80 on dendritic cells or myeloid derived suppressor cells (23).
Although macrophages are clearly present in human heart (24), information regarding their function, origin and heterogeneity in steady state and pathological conditions are lacking. Nevertheless, two distinct populations of macrophages have been identified in left ventricular myocardial specimens from patients with dilated and ischemic cardiomyopathies (25). CCR2+ and HLA-DR High (the human homolog of MHC II) macrophages are monocyte-derived cells with specific pro-inflammatory potential whereas CCR2– and HLA-DR High macrophages are resident cells with reparative properties [(25); Table 1].
Table 1. Immunophenotypic properties of different subsets of embryo- and monocyte-derived cardiac macrophages.
Macrophages and Outside-In Signaling Within Cardiomyocytes
Canonical Role of Macrophages
The interaction between macrophages and cardiomyocytes hypertrophy and survival has been studied in experimental model of acute injury (mainly acute myocardial infarction) or heart failure following pressure overload, hypertensive treatment, or myocardial infarction. Whatever the incentive stimulus, the failing heart contains increased number of macrophages that expand by both local proliferation of resident macrophage and further recruitment and differentiation of circulating monocyte (2, 7, 26, 27). Interactions of cardiac macrophages with other non-myocyte cells including inflammatory cells, vascular cells and fibroblasts shape the dysfunctional heart. These cardiac macrophages also secrete factors that directly or indirectly alter the cardiac extracellular matrix network. Hence, the net impact of cardiac macrophages on cardiomyocyte likely relies on pleiotropic effects involving regulation of distinct and complementary processes. Furthermore, the molecular cascades involved in macrophage specific effects on cardiomyocytes are poorly understood. Nevertheless, the cardiac influx of macrophages on pressure overload, for example, precedes signs of hypertrophy and heart failure, suggesting a direct contribution to cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and survival [(28); Figure 2].
Figure 2. The cardiomyocyte and macrophage cross-talk in cardiac tissue. The expanded cardiac macrophage population plays an important role in the regulation of cardiac dysfunction by secreting factors that directly or indirectly alter cardiomyocyte homeostasis. Notably, considering their abundance, diversity, and phenotypic plasticity, macrophages represent a major reservoir of factors controlling cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, survival and contractility. Furthermore, cardiac macrophages exert non-canonical roles on cardiac conduction or cardiomyocyte proliferation by regulating action potential diffusion or cardiac cell cycle reentry. Nevertheless, the communication between cardiomyocytes and macrophages operates in both directions and cardiomyocytes dialogue toward cardiac macrophages to drive their number, function and phenotype through the release of a broad catalog of macrophage regulating factors. MYDG, myeloid derived growth factor; PS, phosphatidyl serine; ROS, reactive oxygen species; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; REG3β, regenerating islet-derived protein 3-beta.
Considering their abundance, diversity, and phenotypic plasticity, macrophages represent a major reservoir of cytokines. Inflammatory signals induce interleukin(IL)6 release by macrophages and neutralizing IL-6 reduces cardiomyocyte hypertrophy (29, 30). Acutely, IL-6 also prevents cardiomyocytes against oxidative stress-induced cellular damages. IL-6 receptor cooperates with at least one subunit of the signal-transducing protein gp130. Of note, complete loss of gp130 results in massive induction of myocyte apoptosis and dilated cardiomyopathy in response to pressure-overload (31). Alternatively, in chronically exposed myocytes, IL-6 family signaling reduces the basal contractility and the beta-adrenergic responsiveness of the myocytes (32).
Specific subtype of pro-inflammatory CCR2 positive macrophages is a major purveyor of IL-1β (2). Interestingly, in a phase 3 trial, the use of canakinumab, an IL-1 β neutralizing antibody, has been shown to decrease the incidence of repetitive atherothrombotic event in patients with myocardial infarction already on state of the art treatment (33). Inflammatory macrophages also release IL-18, another member of the IL-1 family (34, 35). IL-18 enhances cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and exacerbates cardiac dysfunction as well as fibrosis in infarcted and non-infarcted heart (36, 37). IL-18 could also precipitate adverse ventricular remodeling by reducing capillary density in the ischemic tissue (38). Toll-like receptor activation induces the production of tumor necrosis factor (TNFα) from macrophages. In a genetic heart failure model, TNF-α has been shown to confer cardioprotection by maintaining normal intercalated disc structure and mitochondrial integrity as well as cardiomyocyte function (39). Transforming growth factor (TGF)β produced by cardiac macrophages triggers extracellular matrix deposition (40) but is also a direct mediator of the hypertrophic growth response of the heart (41). Myeloid-derived growth factor is secreted by macrophages and stimulates cardiomyocyte survival (42). In addition, macrophages synthesize IL-10 and leukemia inhibitory factor, which subsequently abrogate apoptosis of hypoxic cardiomyocytes (43).
Beyond cytokine production, macrophages are an overflowing source of biological entities with pro-hypertrophic and survival potential. For example, Galectin-3, a macrophage-derived mediator, contributes to cardiac hypertrophy (44). Removal of micro(mi)RNA-155 in macrophages reduces cardiac hypertrophy and cardiac dysfunction following pressure overload (28). Mineralocorticoid receptor deletion in macrophages abrogates cardiac hypertrophy after aortic constriction (45) or in the setting of hypertension (46, 47). Mice with macrophage harboring prolyl hydroxylase domain protein 2 deficiency display attenuated cardiac hypertrophy and contractile dysfunction after hypertensive treatment (48).
Non-canonical Role of Macrophages
Recent work also reveals that resident cardiac macrophages establish direct connections to cardiomyocytes via connexin 43 gap junctions in the atrioventricular node. In vitro, neonatal cardiomyocytes cause rhythmic depolarizations in macrophages, which in turn, alters the electrophysiological properties of cardiomyocytes. Since macrophages are poorly polarized cells, their coupling with cardiomyocytes depolarizes them. While in the “working” cardiomyocytes an increase of the resting potential inactivates the sodium channels and slows the conduction, the depolarization of the atrioventricular node cardiomyocyte depends on the calcium channels, whose voltage-dependent inactivation is shifted toward higher positive voltages. Activation of a rhodopsin 2 channel specifically expressed in macrophages causes sodium entry and depolarization, improving nodal conduction. Conversely, inactivation of connexin 43 specifically in macrophages, or the congenital deficiency of macrophages, affect the propagation of cardiac electrical impulses, attesting to the existence of a functional connection between resident macrophages and specialized cardiomyocytes within the nodal tissue (24). Macrophages could also regulate conduction abnormalities beyond the atrioventricular node, including the course of atrial fibrillation or ventricular arrhythmias induced by ischemia. Clinically, atrioventricular block is a common indication for implantation of cardiac pacemakers, but many cases of atrioventricular block occur for unknown reasons. Macrophage phenotype and number are modified after acute myocardial infarction and heart failure, conditions associated with sudden cardiac death and ventricular arrhythmias. In this regard, recent work has shown that diabetic inflammation causes secretion by resident macrophages of IL-1β, which destabilizes the electrical activity of cardiomyocytes potentially promoting the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (49). Other cardiac inflammatory diseases, including Chagas disease, Lyme disease, and myocarditis, initiate conduction defects. In these pathological conditions, cardiac macrophages could also participate to the development of atrioventricular block in addition to cardiomyocytes and specialized conductive tissue deregulations. Conduction system development or genetic abnormalities could also be dependent of cardiac macrophage-related actions.
Change in monocyte/macrophage gene expression is associated with decrease in cardiomyocyte proliferation with aging (50). In the neonatal heart, clodronate liposome-induced phagocytic cell depletion abrogates heart regeneration. Human fetal and adult mononuclear phagocytes show distinct pro-inflammatory features after LPS stimulation (2). Furthermore, it has been shown that in response to injury, resident CCR2– reparative cardiac macrophages dominate in the neonatal cardiac tissue and directly foster cardiomyocyte proliferation (22). Comparative analyses have been performed in many species revealing that the regenerative capacity of the cardiac tissue sparsely exists across the animal kingdom, and seems to correlate with immature immune system. As an example, zebrafish exhibits unchallenged ability to regenerate cardiac tissue. Interestingly, another teleost, the medaka, does not share this capacity. Comparative transcriptomic analyses following cardiac cryoinjury in Zebrafish and medaka point to major differences in immune cell dynamics between these two models. Delayed macrophage recruitment in zebrafish hampers cardiomyocyte proliferation and scar resolution. Delayed and reduced macrophage recruitment is observed in medaka, along with inefficient cardiac regeneration. Stimulating Toll-like receptor signaling in medaka activates immune cell dynamics and galvanizes cardiomyocyte proliferation and scar resolution (51). During the regenerative process, cardiomyocytes undergo a transcriptional reversal of cell differentiation program characterized, at least in part, by recrudescence of embryonic gene expression. Interestingly, IL-13 has been identified as a potential upstream regulator of the core network, which induced cardiomyocyte cell cycle entry, in part by the STAT3 pathway (52). Altogether, these studies provide further insight into the complex role of the immune response during cardiac repair, and suggest that macrophage could serve as a platform to release cytokines and growth factors, promoting cardiomyocyte proliferation, at least in neonatal mammalian heart.
Cardiomyocytes and Outside-In Signaling Within Cardiac Macrophages
The communication between cardiomyocytes and macrophages operates in both directions and cardiomyocytes dialogue toward cardiac macrophages using different languages (Figure 2).
First, dying cardiomyocytes send some “eat me” signals to stimulate clearance of dying cells and prevent collateral myocyte loss and infarct expansion. Efficient phagocytic clearance of cardiac apoptotic cells by macrophages involved the coordinated role of 2 major mediators of efferocytosis, the myeloid-epithelial-reproductive protein tyrosine kinase (MerTK) and the milk fat globule epidermal growth factor 8 (MFG-E8). Macrophage defective for efferocytosis leads to cardiac dysfunction (53, 54). Interestingly in ischemic heart, dying cardiomyocytes send unappropriated signals, such as upregulation of integrin-associated protein CD47 or shedding of macrophage MerTK, that impair phagocytic removal by cardiac macrophages (55, 56). Notably, resident MHCIIlowCCR2− cells are characterized by elevated expression of MerTK and, release pro-reparative cytokines, such as TGF-β, in response to apoptotic cell engulfment (57). Of interest, non-professional phagocytes including cardiac myofibroblasts, have also been shown to efficiently engulf dead cells in the infarcted heart. These cardiac myofibroblasts secrete MFG-E8 promoting efferocytosis and acquisition of anti-inflammatory properties (58). Communication between professional and non-professional phagocytes likely coordinates phagocytosis of dying cells in the vicinity of the damage (59). As a prototypic example, in epithelial tissue, following clearance of apoptotic cells, macrophages release soluble growth factors, such as insulin-like growth factor 1, which redirect the phagocytosis of neighbor epithelial cells toward uptake of smaller vesicular components (60). Nevertheless, the existence of this crosstalk between macrophages and non-professional phagocytes remains to be detailed in the pathological cardiac tissue.
Second, in pathological conditions, activated cardiomyocytes can release a broad panel of instructive signals that could control macrophage number and skew their phenotype. For example, neutrophils and macrophages produce the cytokine oncostatin M, which galvanizes the cardiomyocytes to produce the regenerating islet-derived protein 3-β. Subsequently, regenerating islet-derived protein 3-β improves monocyte-derived macrophage number in the cardiac tissue (61). Other molecular entities delivered by hypoxic cardiomyocytes such as inhibitors of the WNT pathway, radical oxygen species or the release of cytosolic nucleic acid also modulate the number and phenotype of cardiac macrophages (62–64). In hypertensive heart failure model, microarray and immunohistochemistry analysis revealed a cardiomyocyte specific upregulation of 12/15-lipoxygenase, a major enzyme metabolizing arachidonic acid into hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acids. Cardiomyocyte overexpression of 12/15-lipoxygenase increases cardiac CCL2 contents leading to accumulation of inflammatory macrophages and systolic dysfunction (65). Extensive amount of evidences highlights that cell-to-cell communication involves extracellular vesicles (EVs). EVs regulate major biological functions, including inflammation. Presence of EVs in cardiomyocyte cytoplasm has been revealed in human hearts. Culture cardiomyocytes are also able to release EVs in vitro (66). Acute myocardial infarction in mice transiently enhances EV levels in the left ventricle. Both large (252 ± 18 nm) and small (118 ± 4 nm) EVs are produced and mainly emerge from cardiomyocytes. Of note, large EVs, but not small EVs, are able to control IL-6, CCL2, and CCL7 release from cardiac monocytes (67). Hypoxic cardiomyocytes have also been shown to release high rate of small EVs (mainly exosomes) containing excessive expression of TNF-α (68). Mixt EV population or small EVs (mainly exosomes) have emerged as critical agents of cardiac repair triggered by different type of cell therapy (69–71). EV-related effects could be mediated by cell-surface receptor activation or delivery of multiple components within the targeted cells. Notably, small EV isolated from cardiosphere-derived cells are enriched in several miRNAs, such as miR-181b, and have been shown to specifically target CD68-positive cardiac macrophages switching their phenotype toward a reparative state (72). Cardiac EVs have also been identified in fragments of the interventricular septum obtained from patients undergoing extracorporeal circulation for aortic valve replacement suggesting that cardiomyocyte-derived EVs could constitute a major component of the cardiomyocyte/macrophage crosstalk (67). One can also speculate that these cardiac EVs could reach the bone marrow and/or the spleen, where they could stimulate a distinct myeloid-biased progenitor subset or monocyte mobilization. Nevertheless, the specific role of large or small cardiac EVs on different subset of inflammatory compounds as well as characterization of their core signaling mediator need to be further explored. Finally, the mechanical deformation of cardiomyocytes by pathways dependent on Mitogen Activated Protein Kinases is sufficient to increase the population of macrophages in the healthy myocardium (26).
Hence, cardiomyocytes and macrophages form an interspersed network and dialogue with each other to profile the multiple processes shaping the cardiac tissue. In pathological settings, the exact roles of resident embryonically derived- and monocyte-derived macrophage subsets on cardiomyocyte homeostasis remain to be fully defined. Of note, the use of strategies designed to inhibit CCR2 signaling or endothelial cell-dependent adhesion is of interest to abrogate monocyte-derived macrophages upregulation but likely induces non-specific effects on other inflammatory cell subtypes and, more importantly, hampers the direct impact of monocytes on cardiac remodeling. Such side effects may lead to confounding outcomes and misinterpretation of cardiac macrophages related-actions. For example, monocyte-derived macrophages likely display both positive and negative potential on cardiomyocyte and cardiac tissue. As such, CD206+F4/80+CD11b+ macrophages exhibit strengthened reparative abilities after myocardial infarction. This macrophage subpopulation emerges from bone marrow HSCs through a kinase TRIB1 dependent pathway (73). In addition, IL-4 administration increases the number of reparative macrophages and enhances the post-myocardial infarction prognosis in mice (73). In the stressed heart, one can also speculate that the inflammatory landscape could skew the status of cardiac-resident macrophages from a reparative to a deleterious phenotype. Therefore, studies using specific resident macrophage depletion or distinct resident macrophage gene deletion need to be developed. Nevertheless, cardiac tissue provides a revealing example where macrophage number and phenotype, duration of macrophage-related signaling, from acute to chronic, could balance the protective and pathogenic transition of cardiac tissue.
Inflammation-dependent remodeling process has been predominantly described in acute injury, such as acute myocardial infarction. However, the impact of these inflammatory signalings remain mostly undefined in chronic pathological settings (74). Notably, further studies need to explore the mechanisms underlying the direct roles of macrophages on cardiomyocyte survival and hypertrophy and if specific macrophage sup-population could regulate the progression from compensated hypertrophy to heart failure. Finally, the precise identification of the molecular and cellular signals send from cardiomyocytes toward macrophages would likely improve our understanding of cardiac macrophage physiology and both their beneficial and deleterious actions.
IG, VD, and J-SS perform literature search and writing. All authors approved the manuscript.
This work was supported by Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (DEQ20160334910 to J-SS and IG), Fondation de France (FDF 00066471 to J-SS), French National Research Agency (ANR to J-SS) and institutional grants from Paris Descartes University and the French National Institute for Health and Medical Research.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
2. Epelman S, Lavine KJ, Beaudin AE, Sojka DK, Carrero JA, Calderon B, et al. Embryonic and adult-derived resident cardiac macrophages are maintained through distinct mechanisms at steady state and during inflammation. Immunity (2014) 40:91–104. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.11.019
3. Leid J, Carrelha J, Boukarabila H, Epelman S, Jacobsen SE, Lavine KJ. Primitive embryonic macrophages are required for coronary development and maturation. Circ Res. (2016) 118:1498–511. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.308270
4. Molawi K, Wolf Y, Kandalla PK, Favret J, Hagemeyer N, Frenzel K, et al. Progressive replacement of embryo-derived cardiac macrophages with age. J Exp Med. (2014) 211:2151–8. doi: 10.1084/jem.20140639
5. Gautier EL, Shay T, Miller J, Greter M, Jakubzick C, Ivanov S, et al. Gene-expression profiles and transcriptional regulatory pathways that underlie the identity and diversity of mouse tissue macrophages. Nat Immunol. (2012) 13:1118–28. doi: 10.1038/ni.2419
6. Lavin Y, Winter D, Blecher-Gonen R, David E, Keren-Shaul H, Merad M, et al. Tissue-resident macrophage enhancer landscapes are shaped by the local microenvironment. Cell (2014) 159:1312–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.018
7. Heidt T, Courties G, Dutta P, Sager HB, Sebas M, Iwamoto Y, et al. Differential contribution of monocytes to heart macrophages in steady-state and after myocardial infarction. Circ Res. (2014) 115:284–95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.303567
8. Dutta P, Sager HB, Stengel KR, Naxerova K, Courties G, Saez B, et al. Myocardial infarction activates CCR2(+) hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Cell Stem Cell (2015) 16:477–87. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.04.008
9. Anzai A, Choi JL, He S, Fenn AM, Nairz M, Rattik S, et al. The infarcted myocardium solicits GM-CSF for the detrimental oversupply of inflammatory leukocytes. J Exp Med. (2017) 214:3293–310. doi: 10.1084/jem.20170689
10. Tsou CL, Peters W, Si Y, Slaymaker S, Aslanian AM, Weisberg SP, et al. Critical roles for CCR2 and MCP-3 in monocyte mobilization from bone marrow and recruitment to inflammatory sites. J Clin Investig. (2007) 117:902–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI29919
11. Zouggari Y, Ait-Oufella H, Bonnin P, Simon T, Sage AP, Guerin C, et al. B lymphocytes trigger monocyte mobilization and impair heart function after acute myocardial infarction. Nat Med. (2013) 19:1273–80. doi: 10.1038/nm.3284
13. Hanna RN, Carlin LM, Hubbeling HG, Nackiewicz D, Green AM, Punt JA, et al. The transcription factor NR4A1 (Nur77) controls bone marrow differentiation and the survival of Ly6C- monocytes. Nat Immunol. (2011) 12:778–85. doi: 10.1038/ni.2063
14. Yona S, Kim KW, Wolf Y, Mildner A, Varol D, Breker M, et al. Fate mapping reveals origins and dynamics of monocytes and tissue macrophages under homeostasis. Immunity (2013) 38:79–91. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.12.001
15. Swirski FK, Nahrendorf M, Etzrodt M, Wildgruber M, Cortez-Retamozo V, Panizzi P, et al. Identification of splenic reservoir monocytes and their deployment to inflammatory sites. Science (2009) 325:612–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1175202
16. Horckmans M, Bianchini M, Santovito D, Megens RTA, Springael JY, Negri I, et al. Pericardial adipose tissue regulates granulopoiesis, fibrosis, and cardiac function after myocardial infarction. Circulation (2018) 137:948–60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028833
17. Ngkelo A, Richart A, Kirk JA, Bonnin P, Vilar J, Lemitre M, et al. Mast cells regulate myofilament calcium sensitization and heart function after myocardial infarction. J Exp Med. (2016) 213:1353–74. doi: 10.1084/jem.20160081
18. Nahrendorf M, Swirski FK, Aikawa E, Stangenberg L, Wurdinger T, Figueiredo JL, et al. The healing myocardium sequentially mobilizes two monocyte subsets with divergent and complementary functions. J Exp Med. (2007) 204:3037–47. doi: 10.1084/jem.20070885
19. van Amerongen MJ, Harmsen MC, van Rooijen N, Petersen AH, van Luyn MJ. Macrophage depletion impairs wound healing and increases left ventricular remodeling after myocardial injury in mice. Am J Pathol. (2007) 170:818–29. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060547
20. Zandbergen HR, Sharma UC, Gupta S, Verjans JW, van den Borne S, Pokharel S, et al. Macrophage depletion in hypertensive rats accelerates development of cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. (2009) 14:68–75. doi: 10.1177/1074248408329860
21. Li W, Hsiao HM, Higashikubo R, Saunders BT, Bharat A, Goldstein DR, et al. Heart-resident CCR2(+) macrophages promote neutrophil extravasation through TLR9/MyD88/CXCL5 signaling. JCI Insight (2016) 1:e87315. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.87315
22. Lavine KJ, Epelman S, Uchida K, Weber KJ, Nichols CG, Schilling JD, et al. Distinct macrophage lineages contribute to disparate patterns of cardiac recovery and remodeling in the neonatal and adult heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2014) 111:16029–34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406508111
23. Bronte V, Brandau S, Chen SH, Colombo MP, Frey AB, Greten TF, et al. Recommendations for myeloid-derived suppressor cell nomenclature and characterization standards. Nat Commun. (2016) 7:12150. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12150
25. Bajpai G, Schneider C, Wong N, Bredemeyer A, Hulsmans M, Nahrendorf M, et al. The human heart contains distinct macrophage subsets with divergent origins and functions. Nat Med. (2018) 24:1234–45. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0059-x
26. Sager HB, Hulsmans M, Lavine KJ, Moreira MB, Heidt T, Courties G, et al. Proliferation and recruitment contribute to myocardial macrophage expansion in chronic heart failure. Circ Res. (2016) 119:853–64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309001
27. Ismahil MA, Hamid T, Bansal SS, Patel B, Kingery JR, Prabhu SD. Remodeling of the mononuclear phagocyte network underlies chronic inflammation and disease progression in heart failure: critical importance of the cardiosplenic axis. Circ Res. (2014) 114:266–82. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.301720
28. Heymans S, Corsten MF, Verhesen W, Carai P, van Leeuwen RE, Custers K, et al. Macrophage microRNA-155 promotes cardiac hypertrophy and failure. Circulation (2013) 128:1420–32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001357
29. Diaz JA, Booth AJ, Lu G, Wood SC, Pinsky DJ, Bishop DK. Critical role for IL-6 in hypertrophy and fibrosis in chronic cardiac allograft rejection. Am J Transplant. (2009) 9:1773–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02706.x
30. Kobara M, Noda K, Kitamura M, Okamoto A, Shiraishi T, Toba H, et al. Antibody against interleukin-6 receptor attenuates left ventricular remodelling after myocardial infarction in mice. Cardiovasc Res. (2010) 87:424–30. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvq078
31. Hirota H, Chen J, Betz UA, Rajewsky K, Gu Y, Ross J Jr, et al. Loss of a gp130 cardiac muscle cell survival pathway is a critical event in the onset of heart failure during biomechanical stress. Cell (1999) 97:189–98. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80729-1
32. Yu X, Kennedy RH, Liu SJ. JAK2/STAT3, not ERK1/2, mediates interleukin-6-induced activation of inducible nitric-oxide synthase and decrease in contractility of adult ventricular myocytes. J Biol Chem. (2003) 278:16304–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212321200
33. Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, MacFadyen JG, Chang WH, Ballantyne C, et al. Antiinflammatory therapy with Canakinumab for atherosclerotic disease. N Engl J Med. (2017) 377:1119–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707914
34. Yoshimoto T, Nagai N, Ohkusu K, Ueda H, Okamura H, Nakanishi K. LPS-stimulated SJL macrophages produce IL-12 and IL-18 that inhibit IgE production in vitro by induction of IFN-gamma production from CD3intIL-2R beta+ T cells. J Immunol. (1998) 161:1483–92.
35. Rodriguez-Menocal L, Faridi MH, Martinez L, Shehadeh LA, Duque JC, Wei Y, et al. Macrophage-derived IL-18 and increased fibrinogen deposition are age-related inflammatory signatures of vascular remodeling. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. (2014) 306:H641–53. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00641.2013
36. Toldo S, Mezzaroma E, O'Brien L, Marchetti C, Seropian IM, Voelkel NF, et al. Interleukin-18 mediates interleukin-1-induced cardiac dysfunction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. (2014) 306:H1025–31. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00795.2013
37. Carbone S, Lee PJ, Mauro AG, Mezzaroma E, Buzzetti R, Van Tassell B, et al. Interleukin-18 mediates cardiac dysfunction induced by western diet independent of obesity and hyperglycemia in the mouse. Nutr Diabetes (2017) 7:e258. doi: 10.1038/nutd.2017.1
38. Mallat Z, Silvestre JS, Le Ricousse-Roussanne S, Lecomte-Raclet L, Corbaz A, Clergue M, et al. Interleukin-18/interleukin-18 binding protein signaling modulates ischemia-induced neovascularization in mice hindlimb. Circ Res. (2002) 91:441–8.
39. Papathanasiou S, Rickelt S, Soriano ME, Schips TG, Maier HJ, Davos CH, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha confers cardioprotection through ectopic expression of keratins K8 and K18. Nat Med. (2015) 21:1076–84. doi: 10.1038/nm.3925
40. Damilano F, Franco I, Perrino C, Schaefer K, Azzolino O, Carnevale D, et al. Distinct effects of leukocyte and cardiac phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma activity in pressure overload-induced cardiac failure. Circulation (2011) 123:391–9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.950543
41. Schultz Jel J, Witt SA, Glascock BJ, Nieman ML, Reiser PJ, Nix SL, et al. TGF-beta1 mediates the hypertrophic cardiomyocyte growth induced by angiotensin II. J Clin Investig. (2002) 109:787–96. doi: 10.1172/JCI0214190
42. Korf-Klingebiel M, Kempf T, Sauer T, Brinkmann E, Fischer P, Meyer GP, et al. Bone marrow cells are a rich source of growth factors and cytokines: implications for cell therapy trials after myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. (2008) 29:2851–8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn456
43. Dhingra S, Sharma AK, Arora RC, Slezak J, Singal PK. IL-10 attenuates TNF-alpha-induced NF kappaB pathway activation and cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Cardiovasc Res. (2009) 82:59–66. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvp040
44. Sharma UC, Pokharel S, van Brakel TJ, van Berlo JH, Cleutjens JP, Schroen B, et al. Galectin-3 marks activated macrophages in failure-prone hypertrophied hearts and contributes to cardiac dysfunction. Circulation (2004) 110:3121–8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000147181.65298.4D
45. Li C, Zhang YY, Frieler RA, Zheng XJ, Zhang WC, Sun XN, et al. Myeloid mineralocorticoid receptor deficiency inhibits aortic constriction-induced cardiac hypertrophy in mice. PLoS ONE (2014) 9:e110950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110950
46. Rickard AJ, Morgan J, Tesch G, Funder JW, Fuller PJ, Young MJ. Deletion of mineralocorticoid receptors from macrophages protects against deoxycorticosterone/salt-induced cardiac fibrosis and increased blood pressure. Hypertension (2009) 54:537–43. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.131110
47. Usher MG, Duan SZ, Ivaschenko CY, Frieler RA, Berger S, Schutz G, et al. Myeloid mineralocorticoid receptor controls macrophage polarization and cardiovascular hypertrophy and remodeling in mice. J Clin Investig. (2010) 120:3350–64. doi: 10.1172/JCI41080
48. Ikeda J, Ichiki T, Matsuura H, Inoue E, Kishimoto J, Watanabe A, et al. Deletion of phd2 in myeloid lineage attenuates hypertensive cardiovascular remodeling. J Am Heart Assoc. (2013) 2:e000178. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000178
49. Monnerat G, Alarcon ML, Vasconcellos LR, Hochman-Mendez C, Brasil G, Bassani RA, et al. Macrophage-dependent IL-1beta production induces cardiac arrhythmias in diabetic mice. Nat Commun. (2016) 7:13344. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13344
51. Lai SL, Marin-Juez R, Moura PL, Kuenne C, Lai JKH, Tsedeke AT, et al. Reciprocal analyses in zebrafish and medaka reveal that harnessing the immune response promotes cardiac regeneration. Elife (2017) 6:e25605. doi: 10.7554/eLife.25605
52. O'Meara CC, Wamstad JA, Gladstone RA, Fomovsky GM, Butty VL, Shrikumar A, et al. Transcriptional reversion of cardiac myocyte fate during mammalian cardiac regeneration. Circ Res. (2015) 116:804–15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.304269
53. Wan E, Yeap XY, Dehn S, Terry R, Novak M, Zhang S, et al. Enhanced efferocytosis of apoptotic cardiomyocytes through myeloid-epithelial-reproductive tyrosine kinase links acute inflammation resolution to cardiac repair after infarction. Circ Res. (2013) 113:1004–12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.301198
54. Howangyin KY, Zlatanova I, Pinto C, Ngkelo A, Cochain C, Rouanet M, et al. Myeloid-epithelial-reproductive receptor tyrosine kinase and milk fat globule epidermal growth factor 8 coordinately improve remodeling after myocardial infarction via local delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor. Circulation (2016) 133:826–39. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020857
55. Zhang S, Yeap XY, Grigoryeva L, Dehn S, DeBerge M, Tye M, et al. Cardiomyocytes induce macrophage receptor shedding to suppress phagocytosis. J Mol Cell Cardiol. (2015) 87:171–9. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.08.009
56. Zhang S, Yeap XY, DeBerge M, Naresh NK, Wang K, Jiang Z, et al. Acute CD47 blockade during ischemic myocardial reperfusion enhances phagocytosis-associated cardiac repair. JACC Basic Transl Sci. (2017) 2:386–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.03.013
57. DeBerge M, Yeap XY, Dehn S, Zhang S, Grigoryeva L, Misener S, et al. MerTK Cleavage on resident cardiac macrophages compromises repair after myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury. Circ Res. (2017) 121:930–40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311327
58. Nakaya M, Watari K, Tajima M, Nakaya T, Matsuda S, Ohara H, et al. Cardiac myofibroblast engulfment of dead cells facilitates recovery after myocardial infarction. J Clin Investig. (2017) 127:383–401. doi: 10.1172/JCI83822
59. DeBerge M, Zhang S, Glinton K, Grigoryeva L, Hussein I, Vorovich E, et al. Efferocytosis and outside-in signaling by cardiac phagocytes. links to repair, cellular programming, and intercellular crosstalk in heart. Front Immunol. (2017) 8:1428. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01428
60. Han CZ, Juncadella IJ, Kinchen JM, Buckley MW, Klibanov AL, Dryden K, et al. Macrophages redirect phagocytosis by non-professional phagocytes and influence inflammation. Nature (2016) 539:570–4. doi: 10.1038/nature20141
61. Lorchner H, Poling J, Gajawada P, Hou Y, Polyakova V, Kostin S, et al. Myocardial healing requires Reg3beta-dependent accumulation of macrophages in the ischemic heart. Nat Med. (2015) 21:353–62. doi: 10.1038/nm.3816
62. Meyer IS, Jungmann A, Dieterich C, Zhang M, Lasitschka F, Werkmeister S, et al. The cardiac microenvironment uses non-canonical WNT signaling to activate monocytes after myocardial infarction. EMBO Mol Med. (2017) 9:1279–93. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201707565
63. Mongue-Din H, Patel AS, Looi YH, Grieve DJ, Anilkumar N, Sirker A, et al. NADPH oxidase-4 driven cardiac macrophage polarization protects against myocardial infarction-induced remodeling. JACC Basic Transl Sci. (2017) 2:688–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.06.006
65. Kayama Y, Minamino T, Toko H, Sakamoto M, Shimizu I, Takahashi H, et al. Cardiac 12/15 lipoxygenase-induced inflammation is involved in heart failure. J Exp Med. (2009) 206:1565–74. doi: 10.1084/jem.20082596
66. Bang C, Batkai S, Dangwal S, Gupta SK, Foinquinos A, Holzmann A, et al. Cardiac fibroblast-derived microRNA passenger strand-enriched exosomes mediate cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. J Clin Investig. (2014) 124:2136–46. doi: 10.1172/JCI70577
67. Loyer X, Zlatanova I, Devue C, Yin M, Howangyin KY, Klaihmon P, et al. Intra-cardiac release of extracellular vesicles shapes inflammation following myocardial infarction. Circ Res. (2018) 123:100–6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311326
68. Yu X, Deng L, Wang D, Li N, Chen X, Cheng X, et al. Mechanism of TNF-alpha autocrine effects in hypoxic cardiomyocytes: initiated by hypoxia inducible factor 1alpha, presented by exosomes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. (2012) 53:848–57. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.10.002
69. Gallet R, Dawkins J, Valle J, Simsolo E, de Couto G, Middleton R, et al. Exosomes secreted by cardiosphere-derived cells reduce scarring, attenuate adverse remodelling, and improve function in acute and chronic porcine myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. (2017) 38:201–11. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw240
70. Kervadec A, Bellamy V, El Harane N, Arakelian L, Vanneaux V, Cacciapuoti I, et al. Cardiovascular progenitor-derived extracellular vesicles recapitulate the beneficial effects of their parent cells in the treatment of chronic heart failure. J Heart Lung Transpl. (2016) 35:795–807. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.01.013
71. El Harane N, Kervadec A, Bellamy V, Pidial L, Neametalla HJ, Perier MC, et al. Acellular therapeutic approach for heart failure: in vitro production of extracellular vesicles from human cardiovascular progenitors. Eur Heart J. (2018) 39:1835–47. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy012
72. de Couto G, Gallet R, Cambier L, Jaghatspanyan E, Makkar N, Dawkins JF, et al. Exosomal MicroRNA transfer into macrophages mediates cellular postconditioning. Circulation (2017) 136:200–14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024590
73. Shiraishi M, Shintani Y, Shintani Y, Ishida H, Saba R, Yamaguchi A, et al. Alternatively activated macrophages determine repair of the infarcted adult murine heart. J Clin Investig. (2016) 126:2151–66. doi: 10.1172/JCI85782
Keywords: heart, inflammation, macrophages, heart failure, myocardial infarction
Citation: Gomez I, Duval V and Silvestre J-S (2018) Cardiomyocytes and Macrophages Discourse on the Method to Govern Cardiac Repair. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 5:134. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00134
Received: 17 April 2018; Accepted: 05 September 2018;
Published: 02 October 2018.
Edited by:Paolo Madeddu, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
Reviewed by:Federico Quaini, Università degli Studi di Parma, Italy
Rosalinda Madonna, University of “G. d'Annunzio” Chieti - Pescara, Italy
Antonio Paolo Beltrami, Università degli Studi di Udine, Italy
Copyright © 2018 Gomez, Duval and Silvestre. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jean-Sébastien Silvestre, firstname.lastname@example.org