High Intensity Interval Training Leads to Similar Inflammatory Activation as Seen With Traditional Training in Chronic Heart Failure

Introduction

Inflammatory activation with increased plasma/serum cytokine levels has been described as an important factor for the progression of chronic heart failure (CHF) (1, 2). Cytokines appear to act as catabolic factors in the pathogenesis of skeletal muscle wasting and cardiac cachexia (3–5). This has important implications as muscle mass is an important determinant of exercise and functional capacity (6). Moreover, the progressive loss of muscle mass, cachexia (i.e., weight loss due to an underlying illness), and low levels of muscular strength are strong predictors of the risk for premature mortality (5, 7, 8). Emerging research has demonstrated the important relationship between cytokines, health, and cardiovascular fitness. Lower levels of physical activity, functional status, and/or cardiovascular fitness have been associated with higher levels of inflammation in apparently healthy individuals (9) and persons living with chronic medical conditions (10).

Exercise training remains an important therapeutic intervention in the management of CHF improving exercise capacity, Quality of Life, and various neurohormonal abnormalities (11–14). Acute bouts of exercise can lead to increases in pro-inflammatory cytokines (15–17). In contrast, there is evidence that longer duration (6 weeks to 4 months) exercise training trials may lead to small reductions in pro-inflammatory markers (18–20). However, the evidence in this field remains unclear likely owing to a variety of factors, such as high heterogeneity of participant populations and/or exercise programs studied, low exercise training adherence, and different clinical characteristics or outcomes (14). For instance, some studies have demonstrated that strenuous high intensity physical activity can cause sub-clinical skeletal muscle injury with the potential for an excessive inflammatory reaction and immune suppression (in healthy individuals) (15). A recent 12-week exercise training study revealed that pro-inflammatory markers may be increased in healthy adults following exercise (21). Whereas, another investigation (18) revealed that 12 weeks of group-based cardiac rehabilitation (involving both high intensity interval (HIIT) and moderate intensity steady state (SS) training groups) resulted in a reduced inflammatory state in persons living with CHF.

In the presence of an increased baseline of inflammatory factors, it is possible that even small amounts of physical activity can acutely increase plasma/serum cytokines in extremely deconditioned individuals (such as those living with CHF). Further to this, persons living with CHF who have relatively low inflammatory markers may improve their cardiorespiratory fitness significantly more than those with high inflammatory markers following an exercise program that includes interval training (22). Overall, there is a complicated and unclear relationship between exercise duration (acute and chronic) and intensity as it relates to inflammatory markers in healthy adults, persons living with CHF, and persons living with other chronic medical conditions (23).

The majority of evidence in the field of exercise science and medicine relates to apparently healthy individuals (24). To date, the most appropriate form of exercise training for persons living with CHF is not known. Traditional rehabilitation for CHF involves low to moderate intensity SS exercise training designed to remain below a symptom threshold. However, several researchers have challenged the traditional rehabilitation model and advocated for the incorporation of HIIT (25–30). These recommendations have been increasingly incorporated into national and international cardiac rehabilitation guidelines (31–34). Although HIIT has been shown to lead to significant benefits in cardiovascular fitness and function and other markers of health status (including Quality of Life), there is still debate regarding the observed benefits in comparison to those seen after traditional SS. Several randomized trials have demonstrated superior cardiovascular and/or health outcomes after HIIT (29, 30, 35, 36), with a potentially greater stimulus to the working muscles (37, 38) in patients living with CHF in comparison to traditional SS training. However, others have demonstrated similar changes in health outcomes after HIIT and SS training in persons living with CHF (39).

To date, limited research has examined the acute effects of HIIT on pro-inflammatory markers. In particular, to our knowledge no study has examined the temporal changes in pro-inflammatory markers in persons living with CHF after HIIT in comparison to traditional SS training. This has important implications for rehabilitation practices for persons living with CHF, as it is critical to ensure an optimal training stimulus while minimizing the risk for over-activation of the inflammatory system. Accordingly, the primary purpose of this study was to examine the effects of HIIT in comparison to traditional SS training on inflammatory biomarkers. We also sought to examine the time course of changes in inflammatory markers following acute bouts of HIIT and SS exercise training. We hypothesized [based on work from apparently healthy individuals (40) and persons living with coronary arterty disease (26)] that HIIT and SS would have similar acute effects on inflammatory markers in CHF and those inflammatory markers would return to baseline levels within 48 h.

Methodology

Study Design

A convenience sample of males living with CHF were recruited from St. Paul's Hospital (Vancouver, Canada) to participate in a randomized controlled study. Sixteen patients were identified as eligible participants and approached regarding the study. Two participants were excluded due to a lack of time to complete the study. Fourteen male participants completed the study assessments (Figure 1). All participants were physically inactive, were over the age of 45 yr, had a peak aerobic power (VO₂peak) <25 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹ (7.1 METs), and a left ventricular ejection fraction <35%. Exclusion criteria included: musculoskeletal limitation affecting the ability to use a cycle ergometer, pulmonary disorders that markedly limit exercise, existing contraindications to exercise training, and/or patients who were recently (within last 6 months) involved in an exercise program.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Study flow diagram.

After completing a baseline assessment, participants were stratified (for body mass and VO₂peak) and randomized to complete a single bout of either a SS or HIIT on a cycle ergometer (Model 818, Stockholm, Sweden) while monitored on a 3-lead telemetry system. The randomization sequence was created with a 1:1 allocation using random block sizes of two by an independent research physician. The treatment allocation was kept blind (via opaque and sealed envelopes) to the research physician and research team until after the randomization procedures.

Participant characteristics are shown in Table 1 and demonstrate that the treatment groups were similar at baseline. All participants gave their written informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the protocol was approved by the University of British Columbia (UBC) Providence Health Care Research Ethics Board and the UBC Clinical Research Ethics Board (H05-50260).

TABLE 1

Table 1. Participant characteristics (values are means ± SD).

Participants underwent blood sampling at baseline, and four separate occasions following the training session (immediately post, 6 h post, 24 h post, and 48 h post). Participants were instructed to take all their medications as prescribed and to complete a food record for 3 days prior to testing as well as to complete a food record for the 3 days prior to the training session.

Sample Size

Our sample size was based on previous investigations from our team examining the effects of HIIT vs. traditional SS aerobic exercise training in persons living with coronary artery disease (n = 14) (26). Based on this study, we anticipated that there would be moderate to large effects sizes for transient changes in markers of muscle injury post-training with similar responses between training conditions.

Exercise Stress Testing

All participants completed an incremental exercise test using an electronically braked cycle ergometer with direct gas monitoring via a calibrated metabolic cart (Vmax, SensorMedics) to assess VO₂peak (27) (Table 2). The patients completed a symptom-limited incremental exercise protocol (5–10 W/min) with continuous 12-lead electrocardiography, and the assessment of blood pressure and oxygen saturation every 2 min. Criteria for terminating the exercise test included electrocardiogram changes associated with myocardial ischemia, volitional fatigue, a respiratory exchange ratio of >1.1, a leveling off in oxygen consumption, systolic blood pressure > 200 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure >100 mmHg, dyspnea, or calf/thigh pain (27). The baseline and exercise cardiorespiratory measures are presented in Table 2.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Cardiorespiratory responses at rest and during incremental to maximal exercise testing (values are means ± SD).

Exercise Protocol

Both exercise training groups engaged in a single supervised exercise training bout on a cycle ergometer (Model 818, Stockholm, Sweden) (Table 3). Participants were monitored with 3-lead telemetry, as well as portable heart rate monitors (PolarTM). Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) was collected throughout each exercise bout. Blood pressure was taken before, during, and after the exercise session using an aneroid sphygmomanometer and stethoscope. An equivalent workload was determined for both SS and HIIT in order that total volume of exercise (i.e., isovolumetric) was similar for each group (26, 27) (Table 2). All individuals underwent a standardized 5 min warm-up and a 5 min cool-down prior to, and following, the conditioning exercise. The duration of the conditioning exercise (i.e., 20 min) for both SS and HIIT programs was based on the standard “first” exercise training session in the cardiac rehabilitation program at St. Paul's Hospital.

TABLE 3

Table 3. Exercise responses during steady state and interval training sessions (values are means ± SD).

Steady-State Group

The SS group was trained as per the traditional training model (i.e., 65% heart rate reserve/VO₂ reserve) based on the results of a recent cardiopulmonary exercise test (see Table 3). This is consistent with previous work from our group in individuals with coronary artery disease (20) and CHF (22). The average training METs was 2.8 ± 1.0.

Interval Training Group

We used the HIIT training protocol (i.e., 2 min work phases at 90% of Heart Rate/VO₂ reserve and 2 min active recovery bouts at 40% Heart Rate/VO₂ reserve) that we have previously used safely and effectively in persons living with coronary artery disease (26) and persons living with CHF (27). The average training intensity for each participant in the HIIT group was equivalent to that which would have occurred if the individual had been randomized to the SS group (Table 3). Total work output was calculated as a combination of both the high intensity (i.e., 90% VO₂peak) and low intensity (i.e., 40% VO₂peak) phases of the workout (20) (Table 3). The average training METs were 1.4 ± 0.4 and 3.2 ± 1.0, respectively, during the low and high intensity work phases.

Measurement of Inflammatory Activation

As outlined above, all participants underwent analysis of plasma markers of Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF-α), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), high sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP), IL-8, and IL-10 at five separate time periods. N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT ProBNP) was also assessed. All blood samples were drawn into blood collection tubes from the antecubital vein (with the participant in a seated position) and then immediately immersed in a refrigerated centrifuge and centrifuged within 15 min of collection. Plasma levels of each cytokine (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and CRP) and NT ProBNP were measured using a commercially available high-sensitivity ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) kits [Biosource (IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α), Biocheck (hsCRP), R & D Systems (IL-6)] according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Statistical Analyses

The baseline characteristics and physiological responses to exercise were evaluated using paired t-tests. Changes in plasma cytokine markers at baseline and at four time periods (i.e., immediately, 6, 12, and 24 h) following a single bout of either ST or HIIT exercise were examined using a mixed model Analysis of Variance with Tukey post-hoc comparisons. The relationship between various physiological parameters of interest and baseline levels of inflammatory and skeletal muscle injury markers were determined by Pearson Correlation Coefficient. The level of significance was set a priori at p < 0.05. All data are presented as means ± SD.

Results

There were no significant differences in baseline physiological characteristics between the randomized SS and HIIT groups (Table 1). Similarly, there were no significant differences between groups with respect to the cardiorespiratory responses at rest and during incremental to maximal exercise testing (Table 2).

By design, there was a significant difference between the 40 and 90% interval stages for heart rate, work rate, METs, Rate Pressure Product, and Total Work. When comparing the average values across the entire SS and HIIT sessions there was no significant differences in heart rate, work rate, METs, Rate Pressure Product, and Total Work (Table 3).

There was a main effect for changes in IL-6 with time [F_{(4, 48)} = 3.484, p = 0.014, Partial Eta = 0.225; Observed Power = 0.825] (Figure 2). The IL-6 increased from baseline to immediately post and then returned to near baseline levels at all other time points. There was no statistical significance in IL-6 levels between groups [F_{(1, 12)} = 1.803, p = 0.204, Partial Eta = 0.131; Observed Power = 0.235] and there was no significant time by group interaction effect [F_{(4, 48)} = 0.874, p = 0.486, Partial Eta = 0.068; Observed Power = 0.257].

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) as a function of time. Means ± SD. *Main effect for time observed immediately post-exercise (p < 0.05). Circle = Steady State; Square = Interval. Error Bars = ± SEM.

There were no significant changes in IL-8 following the exercise bout in either the SS or HIIT groups [F_{(4, 48)} = 1.339, p = 0.269, Partial Eta = 0.100; Observed Power = 0.386] (Figure 3). There was also no significant differences between groups [F_{(1, 12)} = 0.931, p = 0.354, Partial Eta = 0.072; Observed Power = 0.144] and there was no significant time by group interaction effect [F_{(4, 48)} = 1.759, p = 0.153, Partial Eta = 0.128; Observed Power = 0.497].

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Interleukin-8 (IL-8) as a function of time. Means ± SD. Circle = Steady State; Square = Interval. Error Bars = ± SEM.

For IL-10, the Mauchly's Test of Sphericity was statistically significant indicating that the variances of the differences were not equal for the main effect of time. Accordingly, the Greenhouse-Geisser correction was applied revealing no significant main effect for time [F_{(1.7, 19.8)} = 2.861, p = 0.089, Partial Eta = 0.193; Observed Power = 0.455] (Figure 4). There was also no significant difference between groups [F_{(1, 12)} = 0.080, p = 0.782, Partial Eta = 0.007; Observed Power = 0.058] and no significant time by group interaction effect [F_{(1.7, 19.8)} = 1.863, p = 0.185, Partial Eta = 0.134; Observed Power = 0.314].

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Interleukin-10 (IL-10) as a function of time. Means ± SD. Circle = Steady State; Square = Interval. Error Bars = ± SEM.

There were no significant differences in TNF-α at any time point [F_{(4, 48)} = 0.305, p = 0.873, Partial Eta = 0.025; Observed Power = 0.112] or between groups [F_{(1, 12)} = 0.902, p = 0.361, Partial Eta = 0.070; Observed Power = 0.141] (Figure 5). There was also no interaction effect between time and group [F_{(4, 48)} = 0.412, p = 0.799, Partial Eta = 0.033; Observed Power = 0.137].

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) as a function of time. Means ± SD. Circle = Steady State; Square = Interval. Error Bars = ± SEM.

For CRP, the Mauchly's Test of Sphericity was statistically significant indicating that the variances of the differences were not equal for the main effect of time. Accordingly, the Greenhouse-Geisser correction was applied revealing no significant main effect for time [F_{(1.5, 18.4)} = 0.855, p = 0.414, Partial Eta = 0.066; Observed Power = 0.160] (Figure 6). There was also no significant difference between groups [F_{(1, 12)} = 1.980, p = 0.185, Partial Eta = 0.142; Observed Power = 0.254] and no significant time by group interaction effect [F_{(1.5, 18.4)} = 0.442, p = 0.598, Partial Eta = 0.036; Observed Power = 0.105]. Both groups had baseline CRP levels that would be considered above normal values. It should be highlighted that one participant had high sensitivity CRP levels that approximated 600 mg/L at all time periods (explaining the variance seen in this measure).

FIGURE 6

Figure 6. High sensitivity C-Reactive Protein as a function of time. Means ± SD. Circle = Steady State; Square = Interval. Error Bars = ± SEM.

Pearson Correlation Coefficients were determined for physiological variables of interest and markers of inflammation at baseline (see Tables 4A, 4B). There were significant correlations (p < 0.05) for IL-6 and CRP (0.65), IL-8 and CRP (0.81), and IL-6 and IL-8 (0.63). There was also a significant correlation between participant height and weight (0.57).

TABLE 4A

Table 4A. Baseline relationship between clinical indicators.

TABLE 4B

Table 4B. The baseline relationship between various inflammatory biomarkers.

Discussion

To our knowledge this study is the first randomized trial to evaluate the acute and temporal effects of HIIT in comparison to traditional SS exercise training on markers of inflammatory function in persons living with CHF. The present study confirmed our hypothesis and demonstrated that there were no differences between the HIIT group and the SS training group for markers of inflammatory activation following either acute SS or HIIT training in inactive and low fitness persons living with CHF. Our secondary hypothesis was also supported with the inflammatory markers returning to baseline within 48 h.

Chronic systemic inflammation is commonly observed with physical inactivity, obesity, and in persons living with chronic medical conditions (such as cancer and diseases of the cardiovascular system) (41). Chronic inflammation has been linked to the development of insulin resistance, tumor growth, and atherosclerosis (41). Accordingly, a growing body of research has examined the role of regular physical activity and exercise training on markers of systemic inflammation in apparently healthy individuals and those living with chronic medical conditions (41, 42).

Examining the acute effects of exercise provides unique insight into the potential health benefits of exercise in persons living with CHF. It is important to highlight that compelling research has revealed that skeletal muscle can produce and secrete cytokines [termed “myokines” (43)] that apply autocrine, paracrine, and/or endocrine effects (41, 43). Contractile activity appears to be the key regulatory factor for the expression and secretion of myokines (41).

Interleukin-6 is produced by several cells such as stimulated monocytes/macrophages, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and skeletal muscle fibers (41). Interleukin-6 was traditionally classified as a pro-inflammatory cytokine with its elevation being commonly associated with systemic inflammation and insulin resistance; however, more recently its anti-inflammatory properties (particularly during exercise conditions) have also been highlighted (41).

Our baseline IL-6 values were elevated in both HIIT and SS groups in comparison to what is often observed in apparently healthy adults supporting data from other studies in persons living with CHF (44–49). In persons living with CHF, elevated IL-6 has been related to impaired cardiac function (e.g., lowered ejection fraction), decreased cardiac functional class, muscle wasting, poor exercise tolerance, the degree of neurohumoral activation, and/or the progression and deterioration of CHF (44, 50–52).

It is important to acknowledge the potential anti-inflammatory effects of IL-6 release during exercise conditions. Interleukin-6 can be classified as a myokine as it is produced by contracting skeletal muscles and is released into the circulation in large quantities (41, 53). Plasma IL-6 is generally thought to increase in an exponential fashion with exercise (54). It is not uncommon for IL-6 levels to increase more than 100-fold with strenuous exercise then rapidly return to baseline conditions (55). As reviewed by Febbraio and Pedersen (55) the appearance of IL-6 in blood precedes other cytokines and exhibits the greatest changes. The IL-6 temporal response is related to exercise intensity, duration, the muscle mass recruited, and endurance capacity (53, 54, 56). The temporal response (kinetics) appears to differ between the type of muscle concentration (i.e., concentric vs. eccentric) (55). Originally the exercise-related increase in IL-6 was thought to be the result of muscle damage. However, research has demonstrated marked post-exercise increases in IL-6 independent of markers of muscle damage (41, 57, 58).

Our findings are consistent with previous research that demonstrates IL-6 increases in response to concentric muscle actions (such as employed during cycle ergometry), However, we did not observe as great of increases in exercise IL-6 as seen by other researchers examining the IL-6 response to maximal exercise in persons living with CHF (48, 49). These differences may be related to the relatively short duration of exercise in our study and the average training intensity employed. Our findings are supported by a recent study (59) that compared light intensity vs. moderate intensity SS exercise in persons living with CHF; overall, the light intensity had lower IL-6 following the session. However, 1 h post-exercise there was an increase in IL-6 similar to the current study. In our study, the average training intensity was controlled between the HIIT and SS groups, further highlighting the importance of understanding exercise intensity as it relates to inflammatory markers in persons living with CHF.

Pedersen et al. highlight that IL-6 plays several important biological roles including the induction of lipolysis, the suppression of TNF-α production, and the stimulation of cortisol production (53). Schnyder and Handschin (41) argued that the exercise-related release of IL-6 has pleiotropic effects by increasing glucose uptake and fatty acid oxidation and enhanced insulin secretion that supports increased glucose uptake into the working muscles.

Several authors have emphasized the important anti-inflammatory roles IL-6 may play during exercise conditions (41, 53, 55). Investigators have suggested that elevations in IL-6 in response to exercise may play an important anti-inflammatory role by inhibiting the production of TNF-α (54). Importantly, TNF-α has direct inhibitory effects on insulin signaling and the ability of IL-6 to inhibit TNF-α production may represent an important mechanism whereby exercise enhances insulin sensitivity (56). In the current study, although IL-6 increased immediately post-exercise, TNF-α did not significantly change following either SS or HIIT. It is possible that IL-6 had an inhibitory effect on TNF-α in the current study as suggested by other researchers (56, 60). This is consistent with other researchers who report that maximal IL-6 levels are found immediately after the exercise followed by a rapid decline (54, 55). Our findings are supported by a review paper on cytokine kinetics that reported more than half of the studies examining TNF-α could not confirm significant increases after exercise (61). However, other researchers have found an increase in both IL-6 and TNF-α levels immediately following maximal exercise in both patients with mild to moderate CHF and in normal controls (49). These researchers concluded that increases in basal IL-6 and TNF-α levels are associated with high sympathetic nervous system activity and exercise intolerance in patients with mild to moderate CHF.

It should be acknowledged that other factors may play a role in the lack of change in TNF-α levels in either the SS or the HIIT group at any time point following the exercise bout. Suzuki et al. highlight that TNF-α is rapidly cleared from the circulation into the urine as a result of a short half-life (14–18 min) (61). If TNF-α is rapidly expelled into the urine it is possible that the immediate post-blood sample taken in our study within 1 h of cessation of exercise would have missed this window especially if the increase in TNF-α levels were relatively small given the duration and intensity of each exercise bout. Furthermore, as noted by Lee et al. (62) the lack of changes in TNF-α seen following exercise may be due to the measurement method; skeletal muscle biopsy may show a different story, which would be important to understanding the effects of inflammatory markers on exercise capacity for adults living with CHF.

In the current study, the baseline TNF-α levels were elevated when compared to data from apparently healthy controls (63) research (5.9 ± 3.3 vs. 2.5 ± 1.8 pg·mL⁻¹). These findings are consistent with other research that has reported increased TNF-α levels in persons living with CHF (45, 46, 49, 63). Our findings support the work of others highlighting the systemic inflammation that presents in persons living with CHF.

Interleukin-8 is a chemokine secreted by several cell types (such as monocytes, neutrophils, epithelial cells, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, mesothelial cells, and tumor cells) (64). It is a chemoattractant and activator of neutrophils (and other immune cells) that is released in response to several stimuli (such as sheer stress, ischemia, hypoxia, and stimuli that activate the nuclear factor (NF)-κB pathway) (64, 65). Interleukin-8 is also associated with the promotion of angiogenesis (41).

Elevated IL-8 levels are commonly observed in chronic medical conditions associated with systemic inflammation. Also, elevated IL-8 has been associated with poor medical outcomes in persons living with CHF (65). Previous studies have reported elevated IL-8 levels in persons living with CHF in comparison to apparently healthy controls (66, 67). For instance, Larsen et al. reported that IL-8 levels were markedly elevated in males with New York Heart Association class II to III stable, ischemic CHF (mean age 67 ± 8 y) when compared to age and sex-matched healthy controls (67). The CHF group had IL-8 levels of 12.7 ± 9.2 pg·mL⁻¹, whereas there was no detectable level of IL-8 in the healthy controls. In our current study, the IL-8 levels were detectable; however, they were not elevated to the same extent especially in the presence of elevated baseline levels of other cytokines (i.e., TNF-α, IL-6, and CRP). It is possible that etiology of CHF may have an influence on the expression of this cytokine.

Elevated IL-8 levels have been observed after exercise, particularly exercise that involves both eccentric and concentric phases (such as running) (68). Marked increases in IL-8 (e.g., 7–11-fold) immediately following prolonged strenuous events (such as marathons and half-marathons) have also been observed in apparently healthy adults (69, 70). Interestingly, other researchers have found no (or limited) change in IL-8 following largely concentric exercise (e.g., rowing or cycle ergometry) (71, 72). In fact, eccentric exercise appears to have a greater effect on IL-8 than concentric exercise (41).

In our current study, there were no significant changes in IL-8 after both SS and INT in persons living with CHF. This is consistent with other researchers that have examined IL-8 after concentric exercise in apparently healthy individuals (71, 72). This is likely the result of the relatively short duration (i.e., 20 min) of exercise, the overall lower intensity of exercise, and the nature of the muscle contractions (i.e., concentric) during bicycle ergometry (41).

Interleukin-10 is believed to be one of the most important and potent anti-inflammatory cytokines in CHF (44). It is known to down-regulate the production of TNF-α and IL-6 and other cell-mediated immune responses (44). Circulating IL-10 concentrations have been reported to be either increased or decreased in CHF patients compared to apparently healthy age-matched controls (63, 73, 74). For instance, Stumpf et al. looked at serum levels of IL-10 in patients with advanced CHF compared to age-matched controls and found significantly reduced plasma levels of IL-10 (2.3 ± 1.9 pg·mL⁻¹ compared to healthy controls 5.2 ± 2.3) (63). Similarly, in our current study we observed reduced IL-10 levels (1.8 ± 1.4 pg·mL⁻¹) when compared to the healthy controls from the research by Stumpf et al. These authors also looked at the ratio of TNF-α to IL-10 and found it to be significantly higher in the CHF group vs. the control group (3.2 ± 1.2 vs. 0.4 ± 0.2). In our current research, the ratio of TNF-α to IL-10 was very similar to that of Stumpf et al. (3.2 ± 2.4) indicating an immunological imbalance in favor of inflammation in our participants living with CHF (63).

Activity-induced IL-10 is produced by stretching and compressing the epithelial cells (75), as well as in response to high levels of other pro-inflammatory markers (such as IL-6 and TNF-α). Other researchers report the relative change in IL-10 following strenuous exercise follows a similar time-course as IL-6, albeit, to a lesser degree (76) and with a slight delay in the response (24). However, there is no clear consensus on the effect of strenuous exercise on IL-10 (24). Some authors report significant increases in IL-10 following strenuous exercise (77–80) while others report limited change (15, 81). A recent systematic review revealed that the changes in IL-10 after intense exercise in healthy adults ranged from 1.57 to 32.99 times (24). Researchers have argued that exercise intensity is a key determinant of the IL-10 response to acute exercise (79) with the greatest changes being seen after strenuous high intensity exercise (24); however, a recent systematic review in healthy individuals revealed that exercise duration and not intensity was the most important predictor of exercise-related changes in IL-10 following acute exercise (40). In our current study, IL-10 did not change significantly following either SS or HIIT exercise. The average relative intensity of both the SS and HIIT exercise bouts would be considered moderate intensity. This in combination with the short duration of the training sessions (both SS and HIIT) in our study supports previous research in healthy individuals (15, 24).

C-Reactive Protein is produced by hepatocytes in response to a variety of inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-6) and has been shown to be a non-specific marker of systemic inflammation (82). The serum concentration of high sensitivity CRP is known to be an independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular events, including death, the need for transplantation and worsening CHF requiring hospitalization (83–86). A recent study (87) involving persons living with CHF revealed that CRP was associated with reduced exercise tolerance (r = −0.65), lower VO₂ at the anaerobic threshold (r = −0.66), and lower VO₂peak (R = −0.70), reflecting worsened cardiovascular performance. In the current study, the baseline high sensitivity CRP values were elevated (Figure 6) possibly reflecting the severity of the heart dysfunction and/or other comorbid conditions that accompany CHF in our participants.

Research on the effects of strenuous exercise on CRP levels is limited particularly in persons living with CHF. As reviewed by Cerqueira et al. (24) strenuous exercise is generally associated with an increase in CRP in healthy individuals that peaks 24 h or more after exercise with a greater increase after high intensity exercise. However, the results in healthy and in particular CHF participants are somewhat equivocal. In our study, CRP did not show any statistically significant change over all time periods or between the SS or HIIT groups. Similar equivocal findings are seen when comparing the changes in CRP that are seen with exercise training. For instance, a recent meta-analysis failed to find evidence of effects of exercise interventions on CRP in persons living with CHF (19). This is contrary to another meta-analysis (88) that revealed a small and significant decrease in CRP after exercise training in healthy adults.

Significant correlations between CRP and IL-6 and IL-8 and IL-6 and IL-8, respectively, were found in the current study. These relationships are not surprising given that CRP and IL-6 have both been associated with increased severity of left ventricular dysfunction and increased NYHA functional class and that high levels of IL-8 have been shown to predict CHF in patients following anterior myocardial infarction (51, 59, 89, 90). All participants in the current study had ejection fractions <35% and were primarily classified in the NYHA functional classes II to III, indicating moderate to severe CHF. Additional support for this finding is data from studies suggesting that CRP may function to markedly exaggerate the actions of IL-6 from endothelial cells and therefore, the increased vascular production of IL-6 may represent a positive feedback loop for the continued production of CRP from the liver (76, 91, 92).

Limitations

It is important to acknowledge the limitations of this randomized clinical trial. For instance, the small sample size limits the generalizability to like-patients (i.e., persons living with CHF with New York Heart Association Classification of Class I-III that have low aerobic fitness levels). Furthermore, because of the convenience sample, it is likely that there is some impact of selection bias and participant selection, consistent with human experimentation in clinical settings. It could be argued that since the participants self-selected to participate in an exercise intervention that they may represent a healthier or more health-conscious group of persons living with CHF. As such, the levels of inflammatory markers may not be representative of all persons living with CHF. However, it should be highlighted that the aerobic fitness levels (VO₂peak = 13.6 ± 4.6 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹; METs = 3.9 ± 1.3) and clinical characteristics of the participants are consistent of persons living with CHF (27) that have a higher risk for premature mortality.

Consistent with the field of research, we opted to conduct unadjusted statistical analyses in this investigation and therefore, we did not control for confounding factors, such as variation in age, medications and their interactions, variation in CHF class, and other disease status. Due to the small sample size, it is unlikely that any confounders would have demonstrated important adjustments to the data. Moreover, stratified sampling procedures were used to help reduce the variability between groups. This study examined the effects of an acute bout of exercise, which does not generalize to long-term effects of exercise on inflammatory markers in adults living with CHF; however, it is important to understand inflammatory profiles at various intensities and duration to understand the profiles of inflammatory markers in this high-risk group that stands to benefit greatly from exercise.

Conclusions

Exercise training plays an essential role in the optimal treatment of patients living with CHF with clear evidence of an overall reduction in premature mortality. There is evidence suggesting that inflammatory status plays a key role in determining the responsiveness to exercise training in persons living with CHF (14, 22). Currently, it is not clear the effects HIIT on inflammation and the time course of inflammatory marker changes following HIIT and SS exercise. The results of this investigation suggest that when either SS or HIIT exercise is prescribed at a similar volume of exercise on a cycle ergometer, there is no indication of excessive or differential activation of the inflammatory system. This research has important implications for persons living with CHF, practitioners, and cardiac rehabilitation practices. The finding of no significant difference in inflammatory activation between SS and HIIT supports the inclusion of HIIT in the menu of activities provided to persons living with CHF.

Further research is warranted to examine the long-term effects of SS or HIIT exercise training in persons living with CHF. Future research should examine the effects of various modalities, dosages, and intensities of exercise on inflammatory markers to further improve clinical exercise prescriptions for person living with CHF.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the University of British Columbia Providence Health Care Research Ethics Board and the University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board (H05-50260). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

AT, AI, JH, and DW: conceptualization, methodology, and investigation. AT, ES, SB, and DW: formal analysis and data curation. AI, JH, SB, and DW: resources. AT and DW: writing—original draft preparation, visualization, and project administration. AT, AI, ES, JH, SB, and DW: writing—review and editing. AI and DW: supervision. DW: funding acquisition. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This research was supported by the Canada Foundation for Innovation (Project #7611), the BC Knowledge Development Fund (Project #7611), the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (Scholar Award to DW), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (No. IA5-156528), and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (No. NSERC RGPIN-2018-04613). AT received graduate support from the University of British Columbia.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the participants in this study and the various undergraduate and graduate students from the Cardiovascular Physiology and Rehabilitation Laboratory at the University of British Columbia that assisted with the study.

References

1. Gielen S, Adams V, Mobius-Winkler S, Linke A, Erbs S, Yu J, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of exercise training in the skeletal muscle of patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2003) 42:861–8. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00848-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Askevold ET, Gullestad L, Dahl CP, Yndestad A, Ueland T, Aukrust P. Interleukin-6 signaling, soluble glycoprotein 130, and inflammation in heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep. (2014) 11:146–55. doi: 10.1007/s11897-014-0185-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Libera LD, Vescovo G. Muscle wastage in chronic heart failure, between apoptosis, catabolism and altered anabolism: a chimaeric view of inflammation? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. (2004) 7:435–41. doi: 10.1097/01.mco.0000134374.24181.5b

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Josiak K, Jankowska EA, Piepoli MF, Banasiak W, Ponikowski P. Skeletal myopathy in patients with chronic heart failure: significance of anabolic-androgenic hormones. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. (2014) 5:287–96. doi: 10.1007/s13539-014-0152-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Koshikawa M, Harada M, Noyama S, Kiyono K, Motoike Y, Nomura Y, et al. Association between inflammation and skeletal muscle proteolysis, skeletal mass and strength in elderly heart failure patients and their prognostic implications. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. (2020) 20:228. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01514-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Saitoh M, Dos Santos MR, Emami A, Ishida J, Ebner N, Valentova M, et al. Anorexia, functional capacity, and clinical outcome in patients with chronic heart failure: results from the Studies Investigating Co-morbidities Aggravating Heart Failure (SICA-HF). ESC Heart Fail. (2017) 4:448–57. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Krysztofiak H, Wleklik M, Migaj J, Dudek M, Uchmanowicz I, Lisiak M, et al. Cardiac cachexia: a well-known but challenging complication of heart failure. Clin Interv Aging. (2020) 15:2041–51. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S273967

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Youn JC, Choi SW, Lee HS, Han S, Shin EC, Baek SH, et al. Prognostic value of leg muscle strength in acute heart failure syndrome. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2021) 53:19–25. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002432

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Lira FS, Rosa JC, Pimentel GD, Souza HA, Caperuto EC, Carnevali LC Jr, et al. Endotoxin levels correlate positively with a sedentary lifestyle and negatively with highly trained subjects. Lipids Health Dis. (2010) 9:82. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-9-82

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. March DS, Lai KB, Neal T, Graham-Brown MPM, Highton PJ, Churchward DR, et al. Circulating endotoxin and inflammation: associations with fitness, physical activity and the effect of a six-month programme of cycling exercise during haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2021) 178:1–9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfab178

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Taylor RS, Walker S, Ciani O, Warren F, Smart NA, Piepoli M, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for chronic heart failure: the EXTRAMATCH II individual participant data meta-analysis. Health Technol Assess. (2019) 23:1–98. doi: 10.3310/hta23660

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Ezekowitz JA, O'Meara E, McDonald MA, Abrams H, Chan M, Ducharme A, et al. 2017 Comprehensive update of the canadian cardiovascular society guidelines for the management of heart failure. Can J Cardiol. (2017) 33:1342–433. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.08.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. O'Connor CM, Whellan DJ, Lee KL, Keteyian SJ, Cooper LS, Ellis SJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure: HF-ACTION randomized controlled trial. JAMA. (2009) 301:1439–50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.454

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Adamopoulos S, Davos CH. Determining exercise training responders through inflammatory status in heart failure. Eur J Prev Cardiol. (2017) 24:1015–6. doi: 10.1177/2047487317703823

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Brenner IK, Natale VM, Vasiliou P, Moldoveanu AI, Shek PN, Shephard RJ. Impact of three different types of exercise on components of the inflammatory response. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. (1999) 80:452–60. doi: 10.1007/s004210050617

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Mann DL, Reid MB. Exercise training and skeletal muscle inflammation in chronic heart failure: feeling better about fatigue. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2003) 42:869–72. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00847-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Niebauer J, Clark AL, Webb-Peploe KM, Coats AJ. Exercise training in chronic heart failure: effects on pro-inflammatory markers. Eur J Heart Fail. (2005) 7:189–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2004.07.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Papathanasiou JV, Petrov I, Tsekoura D, Dionyssiotis Y, Ferreira AS, Lopes AJ, et al. Does group-based high-intensity aerobic interval training improve the inflammatory status in patients with chronic heart failure? A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. (2021). doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06894-5. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Pearson MJ, Mungovan SF, Smart NA. Effect of aerobic and resistance training on inflammatory markers in heart failure patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Fail Rev. (2018) 23:209–23. doi: 10.1007/s10741-018-9677-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Adamopoulos S, Parissis J, Karatzas D, Kroupis C, Georgiadis M, Karavolias G, et al. Physical training modulates proinflammatory cytokines and the soluble Fas/soluble Fas ligand system in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2002) 39:653–63. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01795-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Sloan RP, Shapiro PA, McKinley PS, Bartels M, Shimbo D, Lauriola V, et al. Aerobic exercise training and inducible inflammation: results of a randomized controlled trial in healthy, young adults. J Am Heart Assoc. (2018) 7:e010201. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010201

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Fernandes-Silva MM, Guimaraes GV, Rigaud VO, Lofrano-Alves MS, Castro RE, de Barros Cruz LG, et al. Inflammatory biomarkers and effect of exercise on functional capacity in patients with heart failure: insights from a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol. (2017) 24:808–17. doi: 10.1177/2047487317690458

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Murphy EA, Enos RT, Velazquez KT. Influence of exercise on inflammation in cancer: direct effect or innocent bystander? Exerc Sport Sci Rev. (2015) 43:134–42. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Cerqueira E, Marinho DA, Neiva HP, Lourenco O. Inflammatory effects of high and moderate intensity exercise-a systematic review. Front Physiol. (2019) 10:1550. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01550

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Wisloff U, Stoylen A, Loennechen JP, Bruvold M, Rognmo O, Haram PM, et al. Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients: a randomized study. Circulation. (2007) 115:3086–94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Warburton DE, McKenzie DC, Haykowsky MJ, Taylor A, Shoemaker P, Ignaszewski AP, et al. Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training for the rehabilitation of patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. (2005) 95:1080–4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.12.063

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Safiyari-Hafizi H, Taunton J, Ignaszewski A, Warburton DE. The Health Benefits of a 12-Week Home-Based Interval Training Cardiac Rehabilitation Program in Patients With Heart Failure. Can J Cardiol (2016) 32:561–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.01.031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Freyssin C, Verkindt C, Prieur F, Benaich P, Maunier S, Blanc P. Cardiac rehabilitation in chronic heart failure: effect of an 8-week, high-intensity interval training versus continuous training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2012) 93:1359–64. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.03.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Angadi SS, Mookadam F, Lee CD, Tucker WJ, Haykowsky MJ, Gaesser GA. High-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous exercise training in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pilot study. J Appl Physiol. (2014) 119:753–8. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00518.2014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Haykowsky MJ, Timmons MP, Kruger C, McNeely M, Taylor DA, Clark AM. Meta-analysis of aerobic interval training on exercise capacity and systolic function in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fractions. Am J Cardiol. (2013) 111:1466–9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.01.303

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Stone JA. Canadian Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Translating Knowledge Into Action. Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (2009).

Google Scholar

32. Stone JA, Arthur HM, Canadian Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation Guidelines Writing Group. Canadian guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation and cardiovascular disease prevention, second edition, 2004: executive summary. Can J Cardiol. (2005) 21(Suppl. D):3D−19.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

33. Schwaab B, Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Meng K, Albus C, Salzwedel A, Schmid JP, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation in german speaking countries of europe-evidence-based guidelines from Germany, Austria and Switzerland LLKardReha-DACH-Part 2. J Clin Med. (2021) 10:3071. doi: 10.3390/jcm10143071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Price KJ, Gordon BA, Bird SR, Benson AC. A review of guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation exercise programmes: is there an international consensus? Eur J Prev Cardiol. (2016) 23:1715–33. doi: 10.1177/2047487316657669

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Li D, Chen P, Zhu J. the effects of interval training and continuous training on cardiopulmonary fitness and exercise tolerance of patients with heart failure-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:6761. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136761

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Meyer K, Schwaibold M, Westbrook S, Beneke R, Hajric R, Gornandt L, et al. Effects of short-term exercise training and activity restriction on functional capacity in patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol. (1996) 78:1017–22. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00527-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Meyer K, Foster C, Georgakopoulos N, Hajric R, Westbrook S, Ellestad A, et al. Comparison of left ventricular function during interval versus steady-state exercise training in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol. (1998) 82:1382–7. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00646-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Meyer K, Samek L, Schwaibold M, Westbrook S, Hajric R, Beneke R, et al. Interval training in patients with severe chronic heart failure: analysis and recommendations for exercise procedures. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (1997) 29:306–12. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199703000-00004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Benda NM, Seeger JP, Stevens GG, Hijmans-Kersten BT, van Dijk AP, Bellersen L, et al. Effects of high-intensity interval training versus continuous training on physical fitness, cardiovascular function and quality of life in heart failure patients. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:e0141256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141256

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Cabral-Santos C, de Lima Junior EA, Fernandes I, Pinto RZ, Rosa-Neto JC, Bishop NC, et al. Interleukin-10 responses from acute exercise in healthy subjects: a systematic review. J Cell Physiol. (2019) 234:9956–65. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27920

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Schnyder S, Handschin C. Skeletal muscle as an endocrine organ: PGC-1alpha, myokines and exercise. Bone. (2015) 80:115–25. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.02.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Handschin C, Spiegelman BM. The role of exercise and PGC1alpha in inflammation and chronic disease. Nature. (2008) 454:463–9. doi: 10.1038/nature07206

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Pedersen BK, Febbraio MA. Muscle as an endocrine organ: focus on muscle-derived interleukin-6. Physiol Rev. (2008) 88:1379–406. doi: 10.1152/physrev.90100.2007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Anker SD, von Haehling S. Inflammatory mediators in chronic heart failure: an overview. Heart. (2004) 90:464–70. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2002.007005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Anker SD, Ponikowski PP, Clark AL, Leyva F, Rauchhaus M, Kemp M, et al. Cytokines and neurohormones relating to body composition alterations in the wasting syndrome of chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. (1999) 20:683–93. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1998.1446

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Anker SD, Clark AL, Kemp M, Salsbury C, Teixeira MM, Hellewell PG, et al. Tumor necrosis factor and steroid metabolism in chronic heart failure: possible relation to muscle wasting. J Am Coll Cardiol. (1997) 30:997–1001. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00262-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Kinugawa T, Kato M, Yamamoto K, Hisatome I, Nohara R. Proinflammatory cytokine activation is linked to apoptotic mediator, soluble Fas level in patients with chronic heart failure. Int Heart J. (2012) 53:182–6. doi: 10.1536/ihj.53.182

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Kinugawa T, Kato M, Ogino K, Igawa O, Hisatome I, Shigemasa C, et al. Neurohormonal determinants of peak oxygen uptake in patients with chronic heart failure. Jpn Heart J. (2003) 44:725–34. doi: 10.1536/jhj.44.725

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Kinugawa T, Kato M, Ogino K, Osaki S, Tomikura Y, Igawa O, et al. Interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels increase in response to maximal exercise in patients with chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol. (2003) 87:83–90. doi: 10.1016/S0167-5273(02)00200-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Toth MJ, Ades PA, Tischler MD, Tracy RP, LeWinter MM. Immune activation is associated with reduced skeletal muscle mass and physical function in chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol. (2006) 109:179–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.06.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Kanda T, Takahashi T. Interleukin-6 and cardiovascular diseases. Jpn Heart J. (2004) 45:183–93. doi: 10.1536/jhj.45.183

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Cicoira M, Zanolla L, Franceschini L, Rossi A, Golia G, Zamboni M, et al. Skeletal muscle mass independently predicts peak oxygen consumption and ventilatory response during exercise in noncachectic patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2001) 37:2080–5. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01306-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Pedersen BK, Steensberg A, Fischer C, Keller C, Keller P, Plomgaard P, et al. The metabolic role of IL-6 produced during exercise: is IL-6 an exercise factor? Proc Nutr Soc. (2004) 63:263–7. doi: 10.1079/PNS2004338

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Pedersen BK, Febbraio M. Muscle-derived interleukin-6–a possible link between skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, liver, and brain. Brain Behav Immun. (2005) 19:371–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2005.04.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Febbraio MA, Pedersen BK. Muscle-derived interleukin-6: mechanisms for activation and possible biological roles. FASEB J. (2002) 16:1335–47. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0876rev

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Pedersen BK, Steensberg A, Fischer C, Keller C, Keller P, Plomgaard P, et al. Searching for the exercise factor: is IL-6 a candidate? J Muscle Res Cell Motil. (2003) 24:113–9. doi: 10.1023/A:1026070911202

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Ostrowski K, Schjerling P, Pedersen BK. Physical activity and plasma interleukin-6 in humans–effect of intensity of exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2000) 83:512–5. doi: 10.1007/s004210000312

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Pedersen BK, Steensberg A, Fischer C, Keller C, Ostrowski K, Schjerling P. Exercise and cytokines with particular focus on muscle-derived IL-6. Exerc Immunol Rev. (2001) 7:18–31.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

59. Ribeiro-Samora GA, Rabelo LA, Ferreira ACC, Favero M, Guedes GS, Pereira LSM, et al. Inflammation and oxidative stress in heart failure: effects of exercise intensity and duration. Braz J Med Biol Res. (2017) 50:e6393. doi: 10.1590/1414-431x20176393

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Bruunsgaard H, Pedersen BK. Age-related inflammatory cytokines and disease. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. (2003) 23:15–39. doi: 10.1016/S0889-8561(02)00056-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Suzuki K, Nakaji S, Yamada M, Totsuka M, Sato K, Sugawara K. Systemic inflammatory response to exhaustive exercise. Cytokine kinetics. Exerc Immunol Rev. (2002) 8:6–48.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

62. Lee CT, Chen LW, Chien MY. Effects of exercise training on anabolic and catabolic markers in patients with chronic heart failure: a systematic review. Heart Fail Rev. (2017) 22:723–730. doi: 10.1007/s10741-017-9639-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Stumpf C, Lehner C, Yilmaz A, Daniel WG, Garlichs CD. Decrease of serum levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10 in patients with advanced chronic heart failure. Clin Sci. (2003) 105:45–50. doi: 10.1042/CS20020359

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Qazi BS, Tang K, Qazi A. Recent advances in underlying pathologies provide insight into interleukin-8 expression-mediated inflammation and angiogenesis. Int J Inflam. (2011) 2011:908468. doi: 10.4061/2011/908468

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Nymo SH, Hulthe J, Ueland T, McMurray J, Wikstrand J, Askevold ET, et al. Inflammatory cytokines in chronic heart failure: interleukin-8 is associated with adverse outcome. Results from CORONA. Eur J Heart Fail. (2014) 16:68–75. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hft125

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Cappuzzello C, Di Vito L, Melchionna R, Melillo G, Silvestri L, Cesareo E, et al. Increase of plasma IL-9 and decrease of plasma IL-5, IL-7, and IFN-gamma in patients with chronic heart failure. J Transl Med. (2011) 9:28. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-28

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Larsen AI, Aukrust P, Aarsland T, Dickstein K. Effect of aerobic exercise training on plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha in patients with heart failure. Am J Cardiol. (2001) 88:805–8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(01)01859-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Suzuki K, Nakaji S, Yamada M, Liu Q, Kurakake S, Okamura N, et al. Impact of a competitive marathon race on systemic cytokine and neutrophil responses. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2003) 35:348–55. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000048861.57899.04

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Nielsen HG, Oktedalen O, Opstad PK, Lyberg T. Plasma cytokine profiles in long-term strenuous exercise. J Sports Med. (2016) 2016:7186137. doi: 10.1155/2016/7186137

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Ostrowski K, Rohde T, Asp S, Schjerling P, Pedersen BK. Chemokines are elevated in plasma after strenuous exercise in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2001) 84:244–5. doi: 10.1007/s004210170012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Henson DA, Nieman DC, Nehlsen-Cannarella SL, Fagoaga OR, Shannon M, Bolton MR, et al. Influence of carbohydrate on cytokine and phagocytic responses to 2 h of rowing. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2000) 32:1384–9. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200008000-00005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Chan MH, Carey AL, Watt MJ, Febbraio MA. Cytokine gene expression in human skeletal muscle during concentric contraction: evidence that IL-8, like IL-6, is influenced by glycogen availability. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. (2004) 287:R322–7. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00030.2004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Wykretowicz A, Furmaniuk J, Smielecki J, Deskur-Smielecka E, Szczepanik A, Banaszak A, et al. The oxygen stress index and levels of circulating interleukin-10 and interleukin-6 in patients with chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol. (2004) 94:283–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.06.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Yamaoka M, Yamaguchi S, Okuyama M, Tomoike H. Anti-inflammatory cytokine profile in human heart failure: behavior of interleukin-10 in association with tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Jpn Circ J. (1999) 63:951–6. doi: 10.1253/jcj.63.951

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Winkelman C. Inactivity and inflammation: selected cytokines as biologic mediators in muscle dysfunction during critical illness. AACN Clin Issues. (2004) 15:74–82. doi: 10.1097/00044067-200401000-00006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Kasapis C, Thompson PD. The effects of physical activity on serum C-reactive protein and inflammatory markers: a systematic review. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2005) 45:1563–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.077

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Nieman DC, Konrad M, Henson DA, Kennerly K, Shanely RA, Wallner-Liebmann SJ. Variance in the acute inflammatory response to prolonged cycling is linked to exercise intensity. J Interferon Cytokine Res. (2012) 32:12–7. doi: 10.1089/jir.2011.0038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Nieman DC, Henson DA, Smith LL, Utter AC, Vinci DM, Davis JM, et al. Cytokine changes after a marathon race. J Appl Physiol. (2001) 91:109–14. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.1.109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Peake JM, Suzuki K, Hordern M, Wilson G, Nosaka K, Coombes JS. Plasma cytokine changes in relation to exercise intensity and muscle damage. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2005) 95:514–21. doi: 10.1007/s00421-005-0035-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. de Gonzalo-Calvo D, Davalos A, Montero A, Garcia-Gonzalez A, Tyshkovska I, Gonzalez-Medina A, et al. Circulating inflammatory miRNA signature in response to different doses of aerobic exercise. J Appl Physiol. (2015) 119:124–34. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00077.2015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Gannon GA, Rhind SG, Suzui M, Shek PN, Shephard RJ. Circulating levels of peripheral blood leucocytes and cytokines following competitive cycling. Can J Appl Physiol. (1997) 22:133–47. doi: 10.1139/h97-011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Pepys MB, Hirschfield GM. C-reactive protein: a critical update. J Clin Invest. (2003) 111:1805–12. doi: 10.1172/JCI200318921

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Anand IS, Latini R, Florea VG, Kuskowski MA, Rector T, Masson S, et al. C-reactive protein in heart failure: prognostic value and the effect of valsartan. Circulation. (2005) 112:1428–34. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.508465

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Kavsak PA, MacRae AR, Newman AM, Lustig V, Palomaki GE, Ko DT, et al. Elevated C-reactive protein in acute coronary syndrome presentation is an independent predictor of long-term mortality and heart failure. Clin Biochem. (2007) 40:326–9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2006.10.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Osman R, L'Allier PL, Elgharib N, Tardif JC. Critical appraisal of C-reactive protein throughout the spectrum of cardiovascular disease. Vasc Health Risk Manag. (2006) 2:221–37. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.2006.2.3.221

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Yin WH, Chen JW, Jen HL, Chiang MC, Huang WP, Feng AN, et al. Independent prognostic value of elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in chronic heart failure. Am Heart J. (2004) 147:931–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.11.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Canada JM, Fronk DT, Cei LF, Carbone S, Erdle CO, Abouzaki NA, et al. Usefulness of C-reactive protein plasma levels to predict exercise intolerance in patients with chronic systolic heart failure. Am J Cardiol. (2016) 117:116–20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Fedewa MV, Hathaway ED, Ward-Ritacco CL. Effect of exercise training on C reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med. (2017) 51:670–676. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-095999

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Bruunsgaard H, Ladelund S, Pedersen AN, Schroll M, Jorgensen T, Pedersen BK. Predicting death from tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 in 80-year-old people. Clin Exp Immunol. (2003) 132:24–31. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2003.02137.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Dominguez-Rodriguez A, Abreu-Gonzalez P, Garcia-Gonzalez M, Ferrer J. Prognostic value of interleukin-8 as a predictor of heart failure in patients with myocardial infarction and percutaneous intervention. Int J Cardiol. (2006) 111:158–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.05.063

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Goldhammer E, Tanchilevitch A, Maor I, Beniamini Y, Rosenschein U, Sagiv M. Exercise training modulates cytokines activity in coronary heart disease patients. Int J Cardiol. (2005) 100:93–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.08.073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Modur V, Li Y, Zimmerman GA, Prescott SM, McIntyre TM. Retrograde inflammatory signaling from neutrophils to endothelial cells by soluble interleukin-6 receptor alpha. J Clin Invest. (1997) 100:2752–6. doi: 10.1172/JCI119821

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar