EDITORIAL article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med., 23 April 2025

Sec. Cardiovascular Imaging

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1605768

This article is part of the Research TopicPre-Interventional Cardiac ImagingView all 11 articles

Editorial: Pre-interventional cardiac imaging

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Campus Kerckhoff of the Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Bad Nauheim, Germany
  • 2German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site RheinMain, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • 3Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • 4Department of Cardiology, Ulm University Heart Center, Ulm, Germany

Editorial on the Research Topic
Pre-interventional cardiac imaging

Cardiac imaging techniques are essential for ensuring optimal results and increasing patient safety in the context of invasive cardiac procedures. The field of cardiac imaging has undergone significant advancements primarily through enhanced diagnostic precision that allows for sophisticated peri-procedural evaluation. Among the most relevant imaging modalities, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and cardiac computed tomography (CCT) have revolutionized risk assessment, procedural guidance, and post-interventional assessment and are therefore emphasized here.

Echocardiography is the cornerstone of cardiac imaging as it is an easily accessible and portable modality for functional assessment offering dynamic visualization of cardiac motion, valve function, and also hemodynamics. While transthoracic echocardiography allows for immediate bedside evaluations in routine clinical practice, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) also facilitates guidance of interventional procedures by way of further enhanced diagnostic accuracy and more particularly featuring high-resolution images of posterior cardiac structures (1).

CMR provides advanced tissue characterization with its ability to quantitatively assess focal and diffuse interstitial myocardial fibrosis, edema, perfusion, extracellular volume, and viability in a variety of different diseases (26). The ability to quantify cardiac ventricular volumes and function as well as characterize myocardial tissue composition by novel mapping techniques (7) and 4D flow dynamics (8) with high reproducibility, makes CMR the reference standard for comprehensive cardiac assessment without ionizing radiation.

CCT provides anatomical visualization with high spatial resolution, allowing for detailed assessment of coronary artery disease and cardiac anomalies (9). Based on its central role in the evaluation of patients prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation and other structural heart interventions, CCT is nowadays essential for pre-procedural structural heart disease management (10, 11, 12).

Within this research collection, we present and discuss high-quality contributions from the field of cardiovascular imaging with focus on its pre-interventional role and beyond, aiming to cover recent advancements in the field, to familiarize readers with the current state-of-the-art and to provide an outlook into the future. The featured articles include original research articles, reviews as well as case reports highlighting the wide area of application covered by cardiac imaging.

In the first of three selected case reports, Baltodano-Arellano et al. present a rare instance of a cardiac hematic cyst, detailing its imaging characteristics, differential diagnoses and surgical treatment. The accompanying literature review contextualizes the case within the broader spectrum of cardiac masses, offering valuable insights for clinicians encountering similar presentations. In their case report, Tian et al. describe an innovative approach to endoluminal removal of a superior vena cava filter, which was based on pre-interventional CT imaging. The findings provide practical insights for assessing and managing superior vena cava filter complications. In yet another case report, Kang et al. present a rare instance of mechanical hemolysis due to left ventricular (LV) outflow tract obstruction following aortic valve replacement. The successful resolution through transapical beating-heart septal myectomy underscores the role of advanced cardiac imaging in identifying and addressing procedural complications.

The original research study by Pan et al. examines the anatomical details of the mitral isthmus and its proximity to the esophagus, offering insights relevant to atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. Based on CCT, the authors provide a detailed assessment of spatial variations, which can inform procedural strategies to enhance safety and efficacy in catheter-based interventions.

Zheng et al. address the risk and prognostic significance of LV ejection fraction decline in asymptomatic patients with primary mitral regurgitation. Based on risk stratification with cardiac imaging, the study stresses the necessity of timely intervention before irreversible ventricular dysfunction develops.

The role of TEE in percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale is the focus of a study by Luo et al. It introduces a novel method aimed at enhancing diagnostic accuracy and procedural safety, which has implications for reducing complications and optimizing outcomes in structural heart disease interventions.

In another interesting study, Zamani-Aliabadi et al. investigate the utility of 4D flow CMR in quantifying left-to-right shunting in pediatric ventricular septal defect. Comparing its accuracy with right heart catheterization, their research emphasized the potential of noninvasive cardiac imaging in congenital heart disease assessment and management including interventional closure.

The original research by Kong et al. evaluates the diagnostic performance of stress dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging in detecting myocardial ischemia. The study highlights the comparative efficacy of absolute and relative myocardial blood flow parameters in identifying hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.

In the original research by Liu et al., investigators explore the implications of self-reported SARS-CoV-2 antibody positivity on cardiac morphology and function using CMR imaging. Their findings contribute to the growing body of knowledge on post-viral cardiac involvement, emphasizing the role of imaging surveillance in affected populations and their risk of LV hypertrophy potentially requiring medical intervention.

Finally, the elegant review by Stoiculescu et al. synthesizes current evidence on advanced imaging techniques in optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy. It discusses the role of echocardiography, CMR and also nuclear imaging in patient selection, lead placement, and response prediction, highlighting how multimodality cardiac imaging refines therapeutic outcomes in interventional heart failure treatment.

All of the articles featured in this research collection exemplify the pivotal role of pre-interventional cardiac imaging for patient safety, procedural success and therapeutic outcomes. Moreover, imaging-based risk stratification, guidance of complex interventions and refined therapeutic decision-making are highlighted by each one of the contributions demonstrating the ongoing evolution of cardiovascular imaging in contemporary practice. As technological advancements continue to reshape the landscape of cardiac imaging, further adoption in clinical practice, standardization of image interpretation among cardiac imaging specialists and ongoing research focused on these advanced diagnostic modalities will be vital to ensure optimized patient care.

Author contributions

MR: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. MA: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DB: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Thaden JJ, Malouf JF, Rehfeldt KH, Ashikhmina E, Bagameri G, Enriquez-Sarano M, et al. Adult intraoperative echocardiography: a comprehensive review of current practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. (2020) 33:735–55.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2020.01.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Mandoli GE, D'Ascenzi F, Vinco G, Benfari G, Ricci F, Focardi M, et al. Novel approaches in cardiac imaging for non-invasive assessment of left heart myocardial fibrosis. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2021) 8:614235. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.614235

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Patel AR, Kramer CM. Role of cardiac magnetic resonance in the diagnosis and prognosis of nonischemic cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2017) 10:1180–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.08.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Patel AR, Salerno M, Kwong RY, Singh A, Heydari B, Kramer CM. Stress cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2021) 78:1655–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.08.022

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Avanesov M, Münch J, Weinrich J, Well L, Säring D, Stehning C, et al. Prediction of the estimated 5-year risk of sudden cardiac death and syncope or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using late gadolinium enhancement and extracellular volume CMR. Eur Radiol. (2017) 27:5136–45. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4869-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Buckert D, Kelle S, Buss S, Korosoglou G, Gebker R, Birkemeyer R, et al. Left ventricular ejection fraction and presence of myocardial necrosis assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging correctly risk stratify patients with stable coronary artery disease: a multi-center all-comers trial. Clin Res Cardiol. (2017) 106:219–29. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-1042-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Ogier AC, Bustin A, Cochet H, Schwitter J, van Heeswijk RB. The road toward reproducibility of parametric mapping of the heart: a technical review. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2022) 9:876475. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.876475

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Zhuang B, Sirajuddin A, Zhao S, Lu M. The role of 4D flow MRI for clinical applications in cardiovascular disease: current status and future perspectives. Quant Imaging Med Surg. (2021) 11:4193–210. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-1234

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Schoepf UJ, Zwerner PL, Savino G, Herzog C, Kerl JM, Costello P. Coronary CT angiography. Radiology. (2007) 244:48–63. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2441052145

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Rudzinski PN, Leipsic JA, Schoepf UJ, Dudek D, Schwarz F, Andreas M, et al. CT in transcatheter-delivered treatment of valvular heart disease. Radiology. (2022) 304:4–17. doi: 10.1148/radiol.210567

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Renker M, Korosoglou G. The role of computed tomography prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: preprocedural planning and simultaneous coronary artery assessment. J Thorac Dis. (2024) 16:833–8. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1384

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Renker M, Kim WK. Choice of transcatheter heart valve: should we select the device according to each patient's characteristics or should it be “one valve fits all”? Ann Transl Med. (2020) 8(15):961. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.04.13

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: cardiac computed tomography (CCT), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), echocardiography, multimodality imaging, tissue characterization, preprocedural imaging, interventional guidance

Citation: Renker M, Avanesov M and Buckert D (2025) Editorial: Pre-interventional cardiac imaging. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 12:1605768. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1605768

Received: 3 April 2025; Accepted: 8 April 2025;
Published: 23 April 2025.

Edited and Reviewed by: Christos Bourantas, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom

Copyright: © 2025 Renker, Avanesov and Buckert. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Matthias Renker, bS5yZW5rZXJAa2VyY2tob2ZmLWtsaW5pay5kZQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.