REVIEW article

Front. Electron., 06 September 2022

Sec. Flexible and Printed Electronics

Volume 3 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/felec.2022.985681

Biodegradable polymeric materials for flexible and degradable electronics

  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices, School of Optoelectronic Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

  • 2. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, Chengdu, China

Article metrics

View details

37

Citations

12,7k

Views

2,7k

Downloads

Abstract

Biodegradable electronics have great potential to reduce the environmental footprint of electronic devices and to avoid secondary removal of implantable health monitors and therapeutic electronics. Benefiting from the intensive innovation on biodegradable nanomaterials, current transient electronics can realize full components’ degradability. However, design of materials with tissue-comparable flexibility, desired dielectric properties, suitable biocompatibility and programmable biodegradability will always be a challenge to explore the subtle trade-offs between these parameters. In this review, we firstly discuss the general chemical structure and degradation behavior of polymeric biodegradable materials that have been widely studied for various applications. Then, specific properties of different degradable polymer materials such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, and flexibility were compared and evaluated for real-life applications. Complex biodegradable electronics and related strategies with enhanced functionality aimed for different components including substrates, insulators, conductors and semiconductors in complex biodegradable electronics are further researched and discussed. Finally, typical applications of biodegradable electronics in sensing, therapeutic drug delivery, energy storage and integrated electronic systems are highlighted. This paper critically reviews the significant progress made in the field and highlights the future prospects.

1 Introduction

The emergence of flexible electronic devices offers unlimited possibilities for their application in many areas of smart electronics, including health monitors (Li et al., 2020a), therapeutic devices (Long et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2021; Long et al., 2021), wireless power supply components (Li et al., 2018a; Li et al., 2020b; Li et al., 2020c; Li et al., 2021a) and artificial electronic skin (Chou et al., 2015; Miyamoto et al., 2017), etc. Flexible electronic devices should be developed with good mechanical deformability and integrated functionality, designed to adapt to the specific tissues with which they interact and to move with minimal damage to tissue properties, significantly reducing the immune response of human tissues (Wang et al., 2020a). However, prolonged exposure to non-biological components in the vicinity of the implanted organ will inevitably lead to a negative immune response in the short and/or long term (Li et al., 2020d; Wang et al., 2022a). As a result, surgical removal of chronic implants is often required after the intended use has been achieved, but this additional secondary surgery can be physically and financially taxing for the patient.

Over the past decade, biodegradable electronic devices (transient electronics) that naturally degrade or completely dissolve in the physiological environment have emerged as attractive alternatives in invasive and non-invasive biomedical fields. Arterial pulse sensors for blood flow monitoring (Boutry et al., 2019), bioresorbable pacemakers without leads or batteries (Choi et al., 2021), biodegradable supercapacitors (Hu et al., 2019), and multifunctional integrated electronic skins represent flexible (Kang et al., 2016), stretchable biodegradable electronics that can be safely absorbed by the body after they have completed their therapeutic and diagnostic functions, marking a tremendous advancement of transient electronics in biomedicine (Figure 1). More importantly, these efforts benefit from the vast chemical design space of various organic polymers allowing great tunability of electronic, mechanical and degradable properties. This tunability circumvents the use of complex structures and patterns to achieve the desired properties and facilitates the development of advanced biodegradable electronics.

FIGURE 1

For many applications, complete breakdown of the polymer into monomeric structural units (Type I degradable polymers) (Feig et al., 2018) is not required, and the breakdown equipment alone is sufficient to alleviate the need for invasive and expensive recycling procedures (Feig et al., 2018). In addition to macroscopic degradation, the molecular cleavage of the polymer backbone into oligomers and monomers can be further broken down by immune mechanisms in vivo or through microorganisms in the environment. This more complete chemical degradation (called Type II) (Feig et al., 2018) may help alleviate the environmental problems of discarded e-waste as electronics become more prevalent (Li et al., 2018b).

This review provides an overview of the chemical structure and degradation behavior of degradable polymers used in a wide range of electronic products, comparing and evaluating the mechanical and degradation properties of different degradable polymeric materials, focusing on the tunable electronic properties of polymeric materials. Finally, typical applications of biodegradable polymers materials in sensing, therapeutic drug delivery, energy storage and integrated electronic systems are presented, and the main challenges and future prospects for stretchable and bioresorbable electronics are indicated.

2 Properties of polymeric biodegradable materials

2.1 Common chemical composition and structure of biodegradable materials

Biodegradable polymers include both naturally derived materials and synthetic polymers, which are classified in the manner shown in the Figure 2. Among the naturally derived materials, plant-based polysaccharides (e.g., cellulose, alginate, dextran) and animal-derived polymers (e.g., collagen, silk, chitosan) are used for transient electronic applications due to their inherent enzymatic degradability (Sun et al., 2018). However, these materials, despite their better biocompatibility and degradable properties, may be more complex to extract than synthetic polymers (Diouf-Lewis et al., 2017; Kumar et al., 2018; Chang et al., 2020). Since the simplest linear, aliphatic and thermoplastic polyester polyglycolide (PGA) was marketed as the first biodegradable suture in the 1960s, many advances in the development of synthetic biodegradable polymers have been made in a range of synthetic biodegradable polymers (Schmitt et al., 1969; Middleton and Tipton, 2000; Nair and Laurencin, 2007). Various biodegradable poly (α-ester) cross-linked elastomers such as poly (1,8-octanediol-citrate) (POC) citrate and poly (glycerol sebacate) (PGS), polycarbonate, polyurethane (PU), polydioxanone, and polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) have emerged. Of these, poly (lactic acid) or poly (propylene glycol) (PLA/PLLA), poly (co-glycolic acid) or poly (propylene glycol) (co-glycol) (PLGA), POC, PGS, polycaprolactone (PCL), and more recently, polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and polyhydroxyvalerate (PHV) have attracted the most attention (Can et al., 2011; Vey et al., 2011; Bonartsev et al., 2012; Tian et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2014; Goonoo et al., 2015; Regazzoli et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2022b; Vlachopoulos et al., 2022).

FIGURE 2

Polymeric materials are highly tunable in terms of their chemical structure, morphology and dissolution time scales, and their rates can be adjusted by changing the intrinsic properties of the polymer, including molecular weight, crystal structure, chemical composition, hydrophilic or hydrophobic properties and erosion mechanisms (Nair and Laurencin, 2007; Feig et al., 2018). In addition to flexibility and biocompatibility, this ability to modulate the intrinsic properties of polymeric materials makes them promising candidates for compliant, customizable and biodegradable device components (Amass et al., 1998; Nair and Laurencin, 2007).

2.2 Design and selection criteria for biodegradable polymer materials

Polymers are attractive for their scalability, solution processability, ability to be rationally tuned by synthetic design, and a variety of material properties (e.g., stretchability, toughness, compliance, electrical conductivity) (Chiong et al., 2021). In designing polymers that are eco- and human-friendly as well as impart desirable properties (e.g., self-healing, stimulus responsiveness, adhesion) for electronic applications. Next, we will discuss how to design polymers to impart biocompatible, biodegradable, flexible, conductive or other specific functional properties.

2.2.1 Biocompatibility

Generally, a material is considered biocompatible if it produces an acceptable host response when exposed to body or body fluids (Vert et al., 2012). These adverse reactions are triggered by chemical or physical reactions of the material and include chronic inflammation, production of cytotoxic substances, and corrosion of the implanted material and so on (Irimia-Vladu, 2014; Cao and Uhrich, 2018). When considering wearable and implantable electronics, degradable polymer materials must not only be chemically compatible with their surroundings (i.e., hydrophilic, non-contaminating, non-toxic), but also mechanically compatible (i.e., flexible, stretchable) (Vert et al., 2012). Rigorous evaluation through in vitro culture experiments or in vivo implantation is critical before materials can be classified as biocompatible.

Natural polymers derived from biological systems, including polymers derived from proteins and polysaccharides (e.g., sericin, collagen, gelatin, elastin) are readily available, inexpensive, and often biocompatible (i.e., non-toxic and non-inflammatory) (Xu et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2020b). Synthetic polymers such as PLA, PLGA, and PEG are often used in implantable electronics due to their typical lubricity, sterilization capabilities, broad temperature tolerance and minimal chemical reactivity in vivo (Fukai et al., 2004; Teng, 2012; Huang, 2017).

In recent scientific studies, many representative biocompatibility studies of degradable polymers have been widely reported (Hosseini et al., 2021). For example, the biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres implanted in rats was verified by human histological and immunological analyses (Anderson and Shive, 2012). The biocompatibility of POC scaffolds was confirmed by their lack of effect on the morphology and phenotype of porcine chondrocytes (Jeong and Hollister, 2010). The biocompatibility of PGS films was demonstrated in a similar manner (Rai et al., 2012). The biocompatibility of PCL films was confirmed by examining the effect of their exposure on the viability of L929 mouse fibroblasts (Serrano et al., 2004). Finally, the in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility of silk has been widely demonstrated, and it is widely used as a substrate for degradable electronics and in many biomedical applications (Vepari and Kaplan, 2007).

In contrast to polymeric materials containing superhydrophilic groups, cationic polymers, particularly poly (ethyleneimine) (PEI), have recently begun to be used in biocompatible polymer research (Englert et al., 2015). Although this cationic polymer has less potential as a substrate and encapsulant, it achieves complete biocompatibility and degradability of the device, which is important to facilitate the development of implantable transient electronic devices. These recent examples demonstrate the importance of considering charge density when designing and modifying the molecular structure of polymers (Bus et al., 2017). Most current polymer-based electronics do not use charged polymers, thus leaving much potential for the application of these emerging polymers in implantable electronics.

2.2.2 Biodegradability

The time that a biodegradable polymer is able to maintain its designed function under conditions of use is the most important indicator of its performance. This duration is referred to as the “functional time” (Hosseini et al., 2021). The time it takes for a polymer material to completely degrade and lose weight is also important. This time is referred to as the “disappearance time” (Chiong et al., 2021; Hosseini et al., 2021; Manousiouthakis et al., 2022). Depending on the chemical and physical properties and the rate of release, the degradation products can cause biocompatibility problems. For the successful use of polymers, the functional time, the time of disappearance, the degradation products and the release rate must be well characterized and controlled. For this purpose, the degradation mechanisms must be understood.

The main degradation mechanisms of the materials used in all these applications are similar, but differ kinetically due to different processing conditions and use environments. Polymers used in biomedical devices have four main degradation mechanisms: hydrolysis (reaction with water in the tissue), oxidation (due to oxidants produced by the tissue), enzymatic degradation, and physical degradation (e.g., water swelling and mechanical loading and wear) (Brannigan and Dove, 2017). Widely used biodegradable synthetic polymers often contain ester bonds that promote hydrolytic degradation under acidic or alkaline conditions. Amide, sulfonamide, anhydride, carbonate, ether, acyl, imide, phosphonate, thioester, urea and carbamate bonds are also unstable sites susceptible to hydrolytic degradation (Brannigan and Dove, 2017; Chiong et al., 2021) (Figure 3A). The mechanism of polymer hydrolysis has been extensively studied and more detailed review articles can be found (Lyu and Untereker, 2009; Brannigan and Dove, 2017) (Figures 3C,D).

FIGURE 3

Oxidation is another fundamental process that degrades polymers. The oxidation mechanism usually involves the formation, proliferation and movement of free radicals within the polymer prior to final termination (George and Celina, 2000) (Figure 3B). These reactions may also involve catalysts, including natural enzymes produced by the body. Enzymatic degradation is also due to defense against implanted foreign substances. Collagen, polysaccharides (hyaluronic acid), some polyesters (e.g., polyhydroxyalkanoates, PHA), synthetic polycarbonates, and proteins are degraded primarily due to these types of reactions (Casas et al., 1999).

An important issue to consider is the effect of polymer degradation products on humans. Hydrolysis produces carboxylic acids and/or hydroxyl chain ends, and the hydroxyl groups can later be further oxidized. The products of the oxidation reaction are usually aldehydes, ketones or carboxylic acids. Implants of smaller size and slower degradation may trigger a milder immune response than larger implants made of the same material (Lyu and Untereker, 2009; Ilyas et al., 2022a).

2.2.3 Mechanical properties of degradable polymers

Flexibility and stretchability are desirable mechanical characteristics for biomedical devices and are critical when attaching materials to the body. The flexible surfaces of organs and tissues greatly limit the application of rigid electronic products, placing higher demands on the flexibility of new biodegradable electronic products, especially the flexibility and stretchability of substrate materials (Feiner and Dvir, 2018).

Cellulose biopolymers and their derivatives have shown high performance (e.g., high Young’s modulus, excellent thermal stability, low coefficient of thermal expansion as well as high strength, stiffness and adsorption ability, excellent degradation properties and biocompatibility) (Fu et al., 2016; Yu et al., 2018) and become the most widely used synthetic degradable polymer substrate materials (Kamel and Khattab, 2020). Diverse modifications of cellulose biopolymers for water solubility, electrical conductivity, optical transparency, and gas tightness have led to successful applications in a variety of emerging fields such as bioresorbable electronics (Zhang and Bellan, 2017), energy storage devices (Yu et al., 2018), and optoelectronic devices (Morsada et al., 2021).

Widely used synthetic polymers and their copolymers (e.g., PVA, PCL, PGA, PLA, and PLGA) have adjustable degradation rates and biocompatibility, but lack tensile properties and flexibility that are compatible with human tissues (Liu et al., 2012; Ilyas et al., 2022b). Unlike traditional biodegradable polymers, degradable bioelastomers require chemical and/or physical cross-linking to form a three-dimensional cross-linked network structure which allows them to typically have a glass transition temperature (Tg) below body temperature, high elongation at break, and a fully reversible stress-strain curve (Drotleff et al., 2004). Physically cross-linked degradable bioelastomers are known as thermoplastic degradable bioelastomers, and chemically cross-linked degradable bioelastomers are also known as thermosetting degradable bioelastomers, which mainly include thermosetting and light-curing bioelastomers. Polyglyceryl sebacate (PGS) provides biodegradability and elasticity as a thermosetting polyol/dicarboxylic acid-based bioelastomer with excellent mechanical properties (Shin et al., 2003). Another thermosetting elastomeric polymer, POC, offers excellent mechanical properties (higher tensile strength, modulus of elasticity) and adjustable degradability (Krook et al., 2020). More physical and chemical properties of typical degradable elastomers are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1

Degradable bioelastomerGlass transition temperature Tg (°C)Tensile strength σ (MPa)Young’s modulus E (MPa)Elongation at break ɛ (%)References
Thermo-cured degradable bioelastomers
 PGS<−800.50.28267Pomerantseva et al. (2009)
 PPS7.3–45.60.57–17.640.37–37810.9–205.2Bruggeman et al. (2008)
 PGD32.10.46–7.21.08–136.55123.2–225Migneco et al. (2009)
 POC−10 to 02.6–6.10.92–16.4100–400Yang et al. (2004)
 PEC−28.2 to 2.90.21–2.660.1–1.91139.5–1,505.5Ding et al. (2006)
Photo-cured degradable bioelastomers
 PGSA−32.2 to 28.10.05–0.50.05–1.3842–189Nijst et al. (2007)
 POMC−36 to −90.29–0.880.07–1.0655.02–322.09Gyawali et al. (2010)
 Fumaric-based PTMC−18 to −130.95–17.51.12–2.3108–753Hou et al. (2009)
Thermoplastic degradable bioelastomers
 Thermoplastic PGS−32.2 to −25.10.21–0.700.07–7.0512%–114%Liu et al. (2005)
 PCL diol, 1,4-BDI, BDO−58.5 to −45.938–5530.1–263.9870–1,200Heijkants et al. (2005)

Representative physicochemical properties of typical thermosetting, photocuring, thermoplastic degradable bioelastomers.

PPS, poly (polyol sebacate); PGD, poly (glycerol dodecanoate); PEC, poly (ethylene glycol citrate); PGSA, poly (glycerol sebacate); POMC, poly (octamethylene-maleate-citrate); PTMC, poly (1,3-trimethylene carbonate); 1,4-BDI, 1,4-butane diisocyanate; BDO, Butanediol.

2.3 Properties for specific components

The basic material types for basic electronic components including diodes, transistors, capacitors and inductors are substrates, dielectrics, semiconductors and conductors. Organic polymer chemistry can be processed to meet the electronic needs of these materials while adjusting for the desired degradation kinetics, stretchability and scalability of production (Feig et al., 2018). Since most polymers are natural insulators, they have been developed as substrates and dielectrics. Whereas conjugated conducting polymers act as semiconductors or conductors. Designing stretchable semiconductor materials, especially conducting polymer materials, has become increasingly challenging because the polymer backbone capable of facilitating electron transport through alternating double and single bonds is usually rigid (Liu et al., 2020). However, recent advances in controlling the chemistry and morphology of conjugated polymers have made it possible to develop stretchable semiconductors and conductors.

2.3.1 Biodegradable substrate and encapsulation material

Substrate and packaging materials typically make up the majority of the weight of the device, and as such, they largely determine the overall degradation behavior of the device (Hwang et al., 2014; Hadidi et al., 2022). Clearly, the selection of substrate and package with the desired degradation characteristics is critical to the design of biodegradable devices. The range of biodegradable insulating materials that can be used as substrates is limited by compatibility with the device fabrication process steps, requiring consideration of thermal stability, solvent compatibility, and mechanical robustness (Hwang et al., 2014). To circumvent these conditions, the target substrate can be separated from the processing step by transferring the device to the substrate after fabrication.

As an example of this strategy (Figure 4A), Hwang and his colleagues demonstrated a versatile transfer printing method to fabricate complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) arrays on a variety of synthetic biodegradable substrates (Hwang et al., 2014), such as PLGA, PCL, and rice paper. The authors used this technique to fabricate a transient hydration sensor made of soluble silicon, SiO2, and Mg components on PLGA that can be used to monitor wound healing, Similar transfer-based strategies have been reported for transient silicon-based devices on PVA, silk, and cellulose (Jin et al., 2014; Jung et al., 2015; Fu et al., 2016). In another work, Hwang and his colleagues used transfer printing methods to fabricate silicon-based micro heaters on silk that degrade after 15 days for transient heat therapy to prevent post-surgical infection (Figure 4B) (Hwang et al., 2012). Bao and colleagues recently fabricated an ultrathin flexible CMOS circuit using trimethylsilyl-functionalized cellulose as a substrate and exhibited complete degradation properties within 1 month (Figure 4C) (Lei et al., 2017).

FIGURE 4

Considering that implanted devices need to adhere tightly around the brain or heart and make stable conformal contact with dynamic biological tissues, more flexible and stretchable substrate materials are required. Stretchable transient Si-based pH and electrophysiological sensors are manufactured from POC using transfer printing, and complete dissolution is observed after immersion in PBS (pH 10)12 at room temperature (Hwang et al., 2015). For such elastomers, photocrosslinking by the introduction of maleic anhydride can also be used to avoid prolonged heat shrinkage and curing (Tran et al., 2010). Similar strategies can be used with other synthetic degradable polymers to expand the range of materials that can be used to make stretchable and degradable substrates.

2.3.2 Biodegradable dielectric

Many stretchable and biodegradable materials used as sealants and substrates may also qualify as dielectrics due to their insulating properties, but the dielectric properties of many polymers have not been fully explored. Currently, the general strategy for creating biodegradable dielectrics is to incorporate high-κ fillers into biodegradable polymeric matrices (Deshmukh et al., 2017). Common high-κ materials include metal oxides (Al2O3, HfO2), SiO2 and carbon nanotube materials (Figure 5A) (Gupta and Gupta, 2009; Zeng et al., 2016), etc. These composites exhibit general transients through matrix degradation while achieving tunable dielectric constants.

FIGURE 5

Plant-based fibers (e.g., cotton, jute, bamboo) and sugars such as glucose and lactose are natural polymers that inherently have practical dielectric properties. OFETs fabricated with sugar dielectrics and fullerenes as semiconductors show a small hysteresis phenomenon (Irimia-Vladu et al., 2010). In addition to natural materials, synthetic biodegradable polymers, such as PGS, also exhibit useful dielectric properties. As shown in Figure 5B, Bao and her colleagues reported the implementation of fully degradable capacitive pressure sensors using pyramidal microstructures of PGS with in vivo degradation rates of approximately 0.2–1.5 mm per month (Boutry et al., 2015). Additionally, it should be noted that most of the aforementioned dielectrics have been studied at relatively low operating frequencies (<1 kHz). For eventual use in more complex electronic devices, additional research and optimization of the high frequency performance of biodegradable dielectrics is needed.

2.3.3 Biodegradable conductors

Conductive polymers (CPs) are synthetic macromolecules with highly discrete π-conjugated backbone structures and configurable side chains. Some of the most common CPs include polypyrene (PPy), polyaniline (PANi), polythiophene (PTh), poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) and their derivatives (Kenry and Liu, 2018; Bao et al., 2022). Similar to dielectric composites, methods for achieving degradable conductive polymers can be divided into two main categories. The first category of degradable conductors includes composites of non-degradable conductive polymers with electrically insulating degradable polymers. The second category of degradable conductors includes conductive oligomers, or degradable conductive polymers by incorporation based on the incorporation of modified monomers, degradable monomer units and conjugated joints.

Biodegradable conductive scaffolds are formed by electrostatically spinning biodegradable polymers and subsequently polymerizing conductive monomers in situ (Figure 5E) (Lee et al., 2009). Alternatively, conductive polymers can be co-spun with biodegradable polymers to form conductive fibers. For example, co-spinning of camphorsulfonic acid (CPSA)-doped polyaniline with gelatin yields fiber sheets with conductivity up to 2.1 × 10–2 S/cm (Li et al., 2006). Similarly, CPSA-doped PANI co-spun with poly (L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) (PLCL) exhibited electrical conductivity up to 1.38 × 10–2 S/cm at 30 wt% PANI (Jeong et al., 2008).

To confer better degradability and faster body clearance to conductive biodegradable polymers, small-sized short chains of conductive monomers, i.e., conductive oligomers, are increasingly being explored as viable alternatives to CPs as conductive components of electroactive biodegradable copolymers (Wei and Faul, 2008). In fact, studies on pyrrole, aniline and thiophene oligomers have shown that in addition to having similar, these oligomers can be processed and copolymerized more readily with biodegradable polymers and show better biodegradability (Wang et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2013). Most importantly, these oligomers can be more readily absorbed and internalized by macrophages and then excreted by the kidneys. Thus, conductive oligomers have emerged as a viable option for achieving fully biodegradable and conductive polymer structures (Kenry and Liu, 2018).

In addition to biocompatibility issues, the mobility of the dopant can be a problem for applications requiring relatively long-term stability, as the conductivity decreases significantly when the dopant leaches. To address this issue, Xu and coworkers synthesized a multi-segmented undoped conductive polyurethane (DCPU) elastomer consisting of an aniline trimer linked to biodegradable PCL and the dopant dihydroxymethylpropionic acid (DMPA) (Figure 5F) (Xu et al., 2016). Immersion in PBS further increases the conductivity up to 4.7 × 10–3 S/cm. Crucially, although their polymers degraded to 75.8% of their original mass in PBS after 14 days in the presence of lipase, the electrical conductivity did not decrease by more than one order of magnitude.

In addition to biodegradable conductive polymer blends and oligomer-based conductive approaches, strategies for the modification of conductive monomers and the integration of degradable monomer units or conjugated joints to produce bioerodible CPs are receiving increasing attention. Instead of partial degradation based on conventional chemical bond breaking, these modified CPs can be gradually eroded to achieve enhanced and complete biodegradation. One of the first studies demonstrating this concept showed that pyrrole monomers could be modified and then polymerized to achieve readily erodible PPy (Zelikin et al., 2002). The conductive films made from acid-functionalized PPy show a low average resistance of about 300 Ω. Importantly, the modified PPy is capable of progressive degradation under physiological conditions. This suggests that the degradation rate of these erodible CPs can be modified by introducing and adjusting the amount of different functional groups.

In addition to monomer modification and integration of biodegradable units, a recent example shows that fully erodible CPs can be prepared by incorporating degradable conjugate linkages. Amine bonds (-C=N-) were used as conjugate linkages to synthesize biodegradable conductive PDPP-PD polymers with an average hole mobility of about 4.2 × 10−2 –3.4 × 10−1 cm2/Vs (Lei et al., 2017). More significantly, the PDPP-PD solutions decomposed to the monomer DPP-CHO after 10 days and completely after 40 days under acidic conditions, based on their absorption spectra and physical colors.

So far, the conductivity of type II conductive polymers may be lower than that of type I conductive polymers (Table 2). Better control of the chemistry, doping, and morphology of these materials could help improve the conductivity of type II conducting polymers for high-performance electronics.

TABLE 2

Biodegradable CP-based structuresDistinct features of the synthesis of copolymersElectrical conductivity (S/cm)References
Type I: Conductive mixtures
 PPy-PLGA nanofiberspolymer blending or coatingN.A.Lee et al. (2009)
 PANI gelatin nanofibers2.1 × 10−2Li et al. (2006)
 PEDOT particles in PLLA4.7 × 10−3Wang et al. (2017)
 PPy-PLA nanofibers1 × 10–6—1 × 10–4Zhou et al. (2016)
 PEDOT-PLGA microfibers7 × 10–2—2.8 × 10–1Feng et al. (2013)
 SF-PPy films1.1Jia et al. (2016)
 GP hydrogelspolymer grafting4.54 × 10–4—2.41 × 10–4Li et al. (2014)
Type II: Conductive oligomers
 DCPU filmsAniline trimer incorporation5.5 × 10−8– 1.2 × 10–5 (dry state)Xu et al. (2016)
4.4 × 10–7—4.7 × 10–3 (wet state)
 DECPH filmsAniline tetramer incorporation3.13 × 10–8—2.94 × 10–4Guo et al. (2011a)
 DEC hydrogels4.69 × 10–7—1.05 × 10–4Guo et al. (2011b)
 PGAP filmsAniline pentamer incorporation2 × 10–5Zhang et al. (2010)
Type II: Biodegradable conductive polymers incorporating modified monomers, degradable monomer units and conjugated joints or a combination of both
 Modified PPy thin filmsβ-substituted pyrrole monomer incorporationN.A.Zelikin et al. (2002)
 Modified PPy pelletsN.A.Zelikin et al. (2002)
 SPT-PEI filmsModified thiophene monomer incorporation7.82 × 10–3—2.94 × 10–4Mawad et al. (2011)

Conductivities of various biodegradable conducting polymeric materials.

2.3.4 Biodegradable semiconductors

Semiconductors are critical to the switching mechanism of organic transistors and therefore to complex electronic circuits. They are usually characterized by the charge carrier mobility, which indicates the rate of free charge movement through the material when pulled by an electric field. Typical semiconductor polymers are polythiophene (e.g., poly (3-hexylthiophene), P3HT) (Bao et al., 1996) and donor-acceptor copolymers originally developed for organic photovoltaics (e.g., diketopyrrolopyrrole, DPP) (Bao et al., 1996). In organic systems, charge transport occurs between and among the conjugated backbones. As with conducting polymers, copolymerization has been used to produce semiconductors that exhibit type I degradation. As shown in Figure 5C (Pérez-Madrigal et al., 2014), poly (3-thiophene methyl acetate) (P3TMA), a P3HT derivative with a carboxylic acid substituent, was selected for use with thermoplastic hybrid polyurethanes (TPUs) showing enhanced semiconductor behavior and electrochemical degradability. Lipomi reported a stretchable and biodegradable semiconductor-a block copolymer based on repeating rigid, conjugated DPP and soft poly (s-caprolactone) (PCL) chain segments-demonstrating improved strain tolerance and a near hole mobility of 0.1 cm2/Vs (Sugiyama et al., 2018). The charge mobility was correlated with up to PCL polyester chains provide hydrolysis sites for chain breakage under physiological conditions, with no detectable PCL content after 12 weeks.

A combination of polymer chemistry and physics was used to develop an intrinsically stretchable and fully degradable semiconductor polymer system. As shown in Figure 5D (Tran et al., 2019), The semiconductor part is the DPP polymer with imine bonds, while the elastomer is based on PCL, where both matrix and semiconductor are designed to completely degrade into monomeric components. Nano-constrained p (DPP-PPD) showed no change in mobility (∼0.03 cm2/Vs) at up to 100% strain and subsequent release.

3 Typical applications in transient electronics

To avoid the potential problems of non-degradable implantable electronics in biomedical applications that interfere with imaging, act as foci for bacterial infection, or migrate and displace, bioresorbable implantable electronics have been extensively investigated as an alternative to permanent implants (Wang et al., 2020a). System-level absorbable devices for biomedical applications can be divided into four main application scenarios: sensing and monitoring, therapeutic drug delivery, wireless power supply, and integrated electronics (e.g., electronic skin). Each category is discussed in detail below.

3.1 Typical applications of transient electronics in the field of sensors

Bioresorbable sensors have been widely reported because physicians often need to track various physiological indicators of patients, especially after surgery, for a short period of time (Salvatore et al., 2017; Lee et al., 2019a; Ashammakhi et al., 2021). Recently reported examples include bioresorbable temperature sensors, chemical/mechanical sensors, and electrophysiological signal sensors. For example, Kim’s group (Figure 6A) (Lee et al., 2019a) reports a biodegradable, integrated drug delivery platform consisting of a temperature sensor, a polymeric drug reservoir, and a heater for controlled intracranial drug delivery via thermal stimulation, achieving enhanced therapeutic efficacy for brain tumor treatment. The device dissolved after a sustained 10-weeks in vivo drug release, leaving no detectable debris or causing side effects. A recent study demonstrated two types of bioresorbable fiber optic pressure sensors for monitoring intracranial pressure and temperature with optical interfaces made of PLGA fibers (Shin et al., 2019), and in vitro solubility studies and histopathological evaluations confirmed the biodegradability of these complete systems.

FIGURE 6

Another fully biodegradable pressure sensor aimed for measuring arterial blood flow in both contact and non-contact modes, as shown in Figure 6B (i) were also recently reported by Bao’s group (Boutry et al., 2019). One week after implantation around the femoral artery in rats, stable operation of the biodegradable sensor was observed. Twelve weeks after implantation, the rats were able to move without any apparent limb damage, after which the sensors were retrieved and it was observed that all sensor components, including the poly [octamethylene maleate (anhydride) citrate] (POMaC) sealing layer, PGS microstructure pyramid, magnesium wire and PLLA membrane, had degraded and only the PHB/HV remained Figure 6B (ii).

Pressure and temperature sensors represent the most studied bioresorbable physical sensors to date. However, several new hot research areas have recently emerged, including biodegradable sensors targeting dopamine, ROS/RNS, and RNA (Tao et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2019a). For applications in the central nervous system, biodegradable soft neurotransmitter sensors have been explored for continuous and real-time monitoring of dopamine levels in the brain and have demonstrated their usefulness as electrochemical sensors (Kim et al., 2018). All components of the sensors were gradually dissolved in PBS at 37°C over 15 h. Real-time monitoring of ROS and RNS in organisms has attracted a lot of attention. A flexible physical transient electrochemical sensor has been used for real-time wireless nitric oxide monitoring Figure 6C (i) (Li et al., 2020e). The combination of a highly stretchable matrix, ultrathin electrodes, and selective membranes gives the sensor ideal flexibility and stretchability and resistive stability, and these materials are fully bioresorbable. The NO sensor completely disappeared after 8 weeks of implantation into the joint cavity. Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining of the implantation site tissue showed no obvious signs of inflammation or any residual PLLA-PTMC matrix and gold nanomembrane electrodes, successfully achieving complete physical transient.

3.2 Biodegradable therapeutic electronics

Biodegradable therapeutic devices have gained tremendous momentum in the last decade, thanks to advances in modulation processes and novel processing technologies for flexible, stretchable degradable materials (Long et al., 2018; Cha et al., 2019; La Mattina et al., 2020; Wei et al., 2021). In 2014, Omenetto and colleagues demonstrated a programmable transient thermal therapy system for surgical site disinfection and anti-infection using a silk substrate and encapsulation with magnesium metal as the heating resistor (Figure 7A) (Tao et al., 2014). The lifetime of the entire device can be further tuned by the encapsulation material, allowing the device to dissolve completely within minutes to weeks. In 2015, a thermal actuator, consisting of Mo electrodes (Lee et al., 2015a), thin PLGA scaffolds, and biolipid membranes, was fully degradable in vivo and successfully implemented to stimulate target tissues or drive drug delivery devices in response to dynamic changes monitored by integrated sensors (Figure 7B). As shown in Figure 7E (Lee et al., 2019a), to treat cancer in organs with special blood barriers, such as the brain, peritoneum, and eye, Kim et al. (2018) reported a flexible, adhesive Bioabsorbable Electron Patch (BEP) consisting of a hydrophilic drug-carrying oxidized starch (OST) membrane and a hydrophobic PLA encapsulated membrane. The synergistic effects and degradable properties for brain tumor treatment by integrating all these materials and device components were demonstrated in vivo mouse subcutaneous and canine brain GBM models.

FIGURE 7

Rogers and colleagues have reported a series of fully bioresorbable implantable therapeutic devices within the last few years, including a fully degradable radiostimulator for accelerated functional recovery from peripheral nerve injury (Figures 7C,D,F) (Koo et al., 2018; Choi et al., 2020), a drug delivery system consisting of mechanically stabilized PBTPA containers (Figure 7G) (Koo et al., 2020) and a recently reported fully implantable and bioresorbable pacemaker without leads or batteries (Figure 7H) (Choi et al., 2021), which are in vitro and in vivo complete degradability have been demonstrated, thus attracting widespread interest and attention.

3.3 Powering of biodegradable and bioresorbable devices

The pollution caused by e-waste and the toxic effects of electronic materials on humans should draw attention to the sustainable development of flexible electronics and the environment. Bioresorbable energy storage devices are integral components of bioresorbable electronic implants because they eliminate the need for external power lines (Li et al., 2018c; Li et al., 2020f). Arranging and integrating efficient power sources for biodegradable and bioresorbable devices is a daunting step. In general, materials and structural design are the primary methods for redesigning typical power devices into biocompatible, miniaturized systems.

Batteries provide high energy density and immediate readiness and are therefore the most widely used power source (Li et al., 2018a; Chao et al., 2021). Transient primary cells, as representative primary cells, can generate currents with spontaneous redox reactions through the redox potential difference between the biodegradable anode and cathode. However, the need for frequent replacement or recharging, the great sacrifice of performance to reduce size, and possible biological toxicity pose significant challenges for biodegradable implantable batteries (Fu et al., 2015). Among various energy storage devices, compared with batteries, high-performance supercapacitors are of great interest because of their high-power density, good cycling stability, fast charge and discharge rates, and simple structure.

As shown in Figure 8ALee et al., (2017a), reported a transient micro-supercapacitor consisting of a biodegradable Mo film, a biopolymer hydrogel electrolyte containing NaCl salts (agarose gel), and a PLGA substrate with a PA encapsulation layer. The performance of the device is comparable to that of non-transient devices. The molybdenum forked finger electrode was completely degraded after 9 days in PBS at pH 7.4 at 37°C and showed stable performance before degradation. Chen et al. (2019) demonstrated an all-wood asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) wood carbon (MnO2 @WC) (Figure 8B) (Zhao et al., 2017). The all-wood ASC device can biodegrade in the environment and provide a significantly high capacitance of 3.6 F cm−2, mainly due to the carbonized and direct-channel wood with high electronic and ionic conductivity and low curvature.

FIGURE 8

As shown in Figure 8C (Lee et al., 2019b), highly flexible biodegradable POC can also be used as an encapsulation layer for supercapacitors, providing good mechanical and electrochemical stability in aqueous solutions. The introduction of microstructure engineering strategies can greatly improve the cycling performance of Zn-Mxene supercapacitors and facilitate the controlled adjustment of device degradation time Figure 8D (Yang et al., 2019). Similarly, as shown in Figure 8E (Sheng et al., 2021), fully biodegradable supercapacitor implants with two-dimensional, defective amorphous MoOx flakes grown in situ on water-soluble molybdenum foil as electrodes and sodium alginate (Alg-Na) gel as electrolyte have high area capacitance (112.5 mF cm−2 at 1 mA cm−2) and excellent energy density (15.64 μWh cm−2)/high power density (2.53 mW cm−2), and their lifetimes can be designed for a few days to several weeks (Sheng et al., 2021).

In recent years, nanogenerators (NGs) have begun to emerge as a new technology for converting biomechanical energy into electrical energy (Figure 8F) (Li and Wang, 2017; Li et al., 2018d; Long et al., 2019; Li et al., 2020b; Chao et al., 2021). Figure 8G Shows a transient friction nanogenerator consisting of PLGA, PVA, PCL, and poly (3-hydroxybutyric-co-3-hydroxyvaleric acid) (PHB/V) (Zheng et al., 2016). The friction generator loses its structural integrity and degrades after 50 days at pH 7.4 PBS and 37°C. Tao et al. reported a suite of silk-based multifunctional implantable transient triboelectric nanogenerators (T2ENGs) for remote in vivo biomedical sensing/monitoring and “smart” therapies automatically triggered by specific symptoms (i.e., epilepsy monitoring) (Figure 8H) (Zhang et al., 2018). Due to the remarkable frictional electrical properties of the silk, the implanted T2ENGs device provides a stable output of ∼6 V for a relatively long period of 6 h. Local injection of 10 ml of saline into the implanted area triggers rapid degradation and loss of frictional electrical function within 30 min.

3.4 Biodegradable integrated electronic systems

By integrating suitable bioresorbable device components, bioresorbable integrated electronic systems can be fabricated as promising solutions to various clinical challenges (Choi et al., 2016a; Choi et al., 2016b; Lin et al., 2016; Li et al., 2021b). Bioresorbable stents have been developed as a potential solution to address in-stent restenosis (Bai et al., 2019). Recently, (Figure 9A) Son et al. (2015) proposed a multifunctional bioresorbable electronic stent that provides postoperative monitoring and therapeutic functions in addition to the original functions of conventional bioresorbable stents (Son et al., 2015). The proposed bioresorbable electronic stent is equipped with a bioresorbable flow sensor for monitoring blood flow and a bioresorbable heater and temperature sensor for controlling postoperative drug delivery. The entire system consists of bioresorbable materials, so the complete biodegradation of the stent reduces the possibility of restenosis. Future research directions for biodegradable integrated electronic systems, including bioresorbable electric scaffolds and postoperative monitoring systems, may lie in the integration of various sensors, memories, wirelessly powered devices, and even therapeutic nanoparticles (Lee et al., 2015b; Lee et al., 2017b; Cha et al., 2019).

FIGURE 9

The human skin has a variety of functions, such as sensing external stimuli, giving flexibility to joint or muscle movement, protecting vital organs from injury, and performing autonomous self-repair (Wang et al., 2018). Further research in skin-inspired integrated electronics will contribute to the great development of electronic skin for prosthetics (Wang et al., 2018; Zou et al., 2018). In 2021, self-powered, sensitive, flexible, breathable, biodegradable, intelligent, and integrated e-skin with a multi-layered, all-nanofibers (NFs) structure was successfully developed (Figure 9B) (Yue et al., 2021). In addition, the e-skin is used to efficiently harvest biomechanical energy and monitor whole-body physiological signals of pressure, temperature, and humidity. Thanks to the complete NFs structure, the e-skin has a breathability of 20.87 ms−1, guaranteeing comfort when worn. This study combines versatile, sensitive and self-powered materials to ensure an intelligent and integrated e-skin to detect various physiological or environmental signals. It even ensures permeability and biodegradability, thus helping to promote more practical and environmentally friendly applications of e-skins in human-machine interfaces and artificial intelligence (Yue et al., 2021).

4 Conclusion and prospects

The rapid development of bioresorbable materials and the understanding of their dissolution behavior have led to the invention of numerous high-performance bioresorbable electronic devices with multiple applications in the last few years. Despite the rapid development and remarkable achievements in bioresorbable electronics, there are some potential problems and challenges, and the main challenges and possible solutions are listed below.

  • 1. Degradation mechanism studies and modulation of degradation behavior. Although a large set of organic and inorganic biomaterials have been studied over the past 30 years, the diversity of degradation behaviors of materials has limited the progress of research. The majority of degradable implantable devices currently utilize simple hydrolysis decomposition mechanisms, and the influence of multiple chemical components in the in vivo microenvironment on the decomposition of implantable materials should be investigated in more depth to expand the application of degradable materials.

  • 2. Innovative chemistry and processing technologies. First, functional polymers from organic sources should be emphasized in future research in order to develop fully organic flexible, stretchable and biocompatible bioelectronics. Further, natural abundance, renewable and intrinsic biocompatible natural polymers should be explored to enrich the field of sustainable healthcare monitoring and green electronics.

There are more areas of concern in the existing research on degradable electronics. In terms of biosafety, attention needs to be paid to the effects of degradation byproducts on humans, which requires relevant clinical studies to investigate potential concomitant chronic or acute diseases from degradation byproducts. In terms of device processing, there are often difficulties in combining new materials with existing technologies or products, and the more critical challenge is also to achieve integration of multiple components in a device without compromising system functionality and device size. Finally, wirelessly powered components should also be considered for inclusion in the overall system considerations.

A systematic research approach could accelerate the progress of future biodegradable bioelectronics research. For designing polymeric materials with specific electronic properties (semiconductors, conductors), new possibilities exist to utilize unconventional degradable connections. Since most degradable materials are studied from different geographic environments in nature, for future work it would be interesting to consider specific microenvironments in the human body that favor decomposition mechanisms other than simple hydrolysis. For example, mechanisms that degrade polymers using highly reactive oxygen and nitrogen radical species produced by macrophages upon encountering foreign bodies. Further understanding of the chemical composition of different natural and physiological environments could open the door to biodegradable polymeric materials that are currently not fully explored in flexible bioresorbable electronic systems.

Statements

Author contributions

ZZ researched the data and wrote the manuscript. YL wrote parts of the manuscript and edited the manuscript. XD and HZ reviewed and supervised the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the Sichuan Provincial Health Commission (Grant No. 17PJ108).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Summary

Keywords

degradation, polymers, flexible electronics, biomedical devices., transient electronics, bioresorbable materials, implantable devices

Citation

Zhai Z, Du X, Long Y and Zheng H (2022) Biodegradable polymeric materials for flexible and degradable electronics. Front. Electron. 3:985681. doi: 10.3389/felec.2022.985681

Received

07 July 2022

Accepted

01 August 2022

Published

06 September 2022

Volume

3 - 2022

Edited by

Jun Li, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States

Reviewed by

Ruosen Xie, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States

Yong Zhou, Chongqing University, China

Weizheng Wang, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States

Updates

Copyright

© 2022 Zhai, Du, Long and Zheng.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yin Long, ; Heng Zheng,

This article was submitted to Flexible Electronics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Electronics

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Share on WeChat

Scan with WeChat to share this article

Article metrics