Abstract
Many of the world's soils are experiencing degradation at an alarming rate. Climate change and some agricultural management practices, such as tillage and excessive use of chemicals, have all contributed to the degradation of soil fertility. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMFs) contribute to the improvement of soil fertility. Here, a short review focusing on the role of AMF in improving soil fertility is presented. The aim of this review was to explore the role of AMF in improving the chemical, physical, and biological properties of the soil. We highlight some beneficial effects of AMF on soil carbon sequestration, nutrient contents, microbial activities, and soil structure. AMF has a positive impact on the soil by producing organic acids and glomalin, which protect from soil erosion, chelate heavy metals, improve carbon sequestration, and stabilize soil macro-aggregation. AMF also recruits bacteria that produce alkaline phosphatase, a mineralization soil enzyme associated with organic phosphorus availability. Moreover, AMFs influence the composition, diversity, and activity of microbial communities in the soil through mechanisms of antagonism or cooperation. All of these AMF activities contribute to improve soil fertility. Knowledge gaps are identified and discussed in the context of future research in this review. This will help us better understand AMF, stimulate further research, and help in sustaining the soil fertility.
Introduction
The most significant threats to soil function at the global level are soil erosion, soil organic carbon, excessive use of input, and nutrient imbalance (Montanarella et al., 2016). The depletion of soil fertility in the world has increased due to unsustainable land management practices, such as overgrazing, bush burning, continuous crop cultivations, and tillage practices (Dewitte et al., 2013). However, inoculation with Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Fungi (AMFs) has been identified as an eco-friendly approach to improve soil fertility (Dal Cortivo et al., 2018). AMF is the most widespread soil microorganisms that form a symbiotic relationship with more than 80% of plants (Prasad et al., 2017), except for a few plant families, such as Amaranthaceae, Brassicaceae, Cruciferae, Chenopodiaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Juncaceae, Cyperaceae, and Polygonaceae, which do not exhibit any association (Brundrett, 2009). They can be found in various ecosystems worldwide (Verbruggen et al., 2012). AMF is a key component of soil microorganisms and belongs to the glomeromycota phylum. This phylum is divided into three classes (Archaeosporomycetes, Glomeromycetes, and Paraglomeromycetes), five orders (Archaeosporales, Diversisporales, Gigasporales, Glomerales, and Paraglomerales), 14 families, 29 genera, and more than 240 species (Krüger et al., 2012; Redecker et al., 2013). Several species of AMF have been studied in the world, however, the most species used as a model are as follows: Funneliformis mosseae (previously known as Glomus mosseae), Gigaspora rosea, Gigaspora margarita, Gigaspora gigantea, and Rhizophagus irregularis (previously known as Glomus intraradices and Glomus irregulare; Schüßler and Walker, 2010). AMF is not a parasite but obligate symbionts that need a host plant to complete their life cycle. They improve crop productivity by increasing water and nutrient uptake, such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) (Anderson et al., 2018). The increase of the host plant nutrient uptake is due to the characteristics of AMF mycelium. These mycelia or hyphae absorb nutrients by osmotrophy and explore more surface area compared to non-mycorrhizal roots (Duponnois et al., 2011). In return, AMF benefits carbohydrates from the host plants (Diagne et al., 2020). Many authors demonstrated that AMF obtains up to 20% of photosynthetic carbohydrates from the host plant (Bonfante and Desirò, 2015; Kaiser et al., 2015). In addition to carbohydrates, lipids are a major source of organic carbon delivered to the fungus (Luginbuehl et al., 2017). It has been discovered that plants provide the fungus with some of the fatty acids that the microorganism needs to grow (Keymer et al., 2017). The biosynthesis of fatty acids has not been observed in AMF in the absence of the plant. Moreover, the genes encoding for fatty acid biosynthesis have not been found in AMF, therefore, these microorganisms depend on the lipid biosynthesis of the host plant. AMF is an extremely ancient symbiosis. Based on archeologic records, it dates to the appearance of terrestrial plants million years ago and would have accompanied vascular plants to colonize the terrestrial environment (Humphreys et al., 2010). AMF does not only have an impact on plant growth and production but it has been also reported that they improve some soil characteristics, such as soil aggregation, soil nutrients availability, water retention, microbial activities, nitrogen, carbon, and phosphorus cycling, and soil acidity correction (Sadhana, 2014; Jamiołkowska et al., 2018; Parihar et al., 2020). Several studies have reported that they play a crucial role in plant resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses. This review aims to summarize knowledge about AMF symbiosis, in particular, the beneficial effects on soil (Figure 1). First, the role of AMF in the physical, chemical, and biological properties of the soil is considered. The contribution of AMF in soil aggregation, nutrient availability, and boosting beneficial soil microorganisms is discussed. Finally, the role diversity of interactions between AMF and other soil microorganisms is examined.
Figure 1
Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on improving soil fertility.
Role of AMF on Improving Soil Physical Properties
Importance of AMF on Soil Structure
Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Fungi have a beneficial effect on soil structure. The AMF mycelia are present in massive quantities in soils (de Novais et al., 2019). These mycelia or hyphae have the property to create stable soil aggregations. Mycorrhizal fungi act as a long-term soil binding agent through the production of a glycoprotein (glomalin) by the extramatrical mycelia (Singh et al., 2020). This glomalin is a hydrophobic, thermo-tolerant, or heat-tolerant resistant to the hot temperature of the soil. The hydrophobic character of the glomalin confers resistance of soil aggregations to water, the production of this substance reaches its maximum in senescent mycelia. The glycoprotein is slowly biodegradable by bacteria and fungi in the soil. The main function of glomalin is to stabilize soil aggregations (Hu et al., 2019; Mubekaphi, 2019), act as a glue that binds together the soil micro-aggregations (diameter <250 μm) to form stable macro-aggregations (Lehmann et al., 2020). These soil macro-aggregations ensure better water infiltration, reduce surface runoff, control soil erosion, reduce nutrients and organic matter losses, increase gas exchange better retention of water and minerals, especially potassium, therefore, improve crop productivity (Demenois et al., 2018; Parihar et al., 2020). In addition, the mycelia network constantly renews itself and the dead mycelia also preserve soil structure until decomposition (Gianinazzi et al., 2010). These dead mycelia contribute to the stocks of organic matter and physical binder involved in soil aggregation (Hamel and Plenchette, 2017). All these mechanisms reduce the risks of soil compaction and promote soil fertility (Norton et al., 2020). It can be said that AMFs improve soil structure through their chemical and biophysical mechanisms, such as enmeshment and alignment. However, there is a lack of information about the lifespan of glomalin in the soil and the effect of anthropology activities, such as bush burning, on soil glomalin.
Role of AMF on Improving Soil Chemical Properties
Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Fungi symbionts are recognized as being major microbial components in the development of the main biogeochemical cycles of soils (P, N, and C). This results in an improvement in the growth of mycorrhizal plants.
Contribution of AMF on Soil Phosphorus Legacy Availability
Phosphorus is an essential element for plants. It is a component of many molecules, such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP), nucleotides, phospholipids, certain enzymes, and co-enzymes (Agledal et al., 2013). Most soils contain enormous amounts of organic and inorganic phosphorus (Requejo and Eichler-Löbermann, 2014). The accumulation of P in soils from fertilizers is known as legacy P (Sattari et al., 2012). This legacy P has the potential to play a key role in maintaining agricultural productivity (Condron et al., 2013; Rowe et al., 2016). It has been revealed that the accumulated P in soils is sufficient to sustain crop yields worldwide for about 100 years (Khan and Zaidi, 2007). Unfortunately, only a few quantities of this soil's P are available for the plants (Balemi and Negisho, 2012). The P is most often in the form of inorganic orthophosphate adsorbed to soil cations. Thus, the availability of P in soil is affected by the presence of iron (Fe), calcium (Ca), and aluminum (Al) oxides, which fix phosphorus as iron phosphate (FePO4), tri-calcium phosphate [Ca3(PO4)2], and aluminum phosphate (AlPO4) (Amanullah and Zakirullah, 2010; Shen et al., 2011). Therefore, only a small proportion (<1%) of the legacy P is available to plants (Rodrigues et al., 2021). Phosphorus is taken in the form of orthophosphates (inorganic phosphate Pi) by plants, but this mineral form of phosphorus is in limited quantity in the soil and, under the action of root sampling, areas are quickly created depletion around the roots due to a slow supply of P, slow phase of the soil, and the low mobility of P in soils (Javot et al., 2007). The reservoir of P must be hydrolyzed to make it available in the soil for plants uptake. AMF plays a key role in improving P availability in the soil. Indeed, it is a P activator that can accelerate the process to transform P into bio-available forms via a range of chemical reactions and biological interactions (Zhu et al., 2018). It was believed that AMF hydrolyzes the organic P into inorganic phosphorus (Shen et al., 2011) through a mechanism linked to the production of enzymes named phosphatase (Tarafdar and Marschner, 1994). However, recent studies revealed that AMF lack the capacity to release phosphatases into the soil (Zhang et al., 2016) but they recruit bacteria known as Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB) that produce phosphatase, which mineralizes organic P and provides a function that is absent from the AMF (Zhang et al., 2018; Etesami and Jeong, 2021). PSB and AMF association is a beneficial feature that has the ability to mineralize insoluble phosphate in the soil and release soluble P that can easily be assimilated by plants (Wei et al., 2017; Mahanta et al., 2018). In that association, the role of PSB is to produce organic acids, such as gluconic acid, ketogluconic acids, siderophores, protons, and acid phosphatases that are involved in the mineralization of organic P in soil (Dobbelaere et al., 2003; Lucy et al., 2004), while AMF mycelia improve the absorption of soluble P in the plants (Taktek et al., 2017). The phosphatase releases P from organic P or inorganic orthophosphate by hydrolyzing phosphoric acid monoesters into P ion and a molecule with a free hydroxyl group (Othman and Panhwar, 2014). It was proven that the double inoculation of R. irregularis and Rahnella aquatilis improves solubilization of inorganic P by the increased production of phosphatase released by the bacteria that is also stimulated by AMF exuded fructose (Zhang et al., 2018). AMF can also solubilize inorganic phosphate into soluble forms through the processes of acidification, chelation, exchange reactions, and production of organic acids, H+, and metabolites (Relwani et al., 2008; Behera et al., 2014). It is demonstrated that the metabolic activities of AMF produce alkaline phosphatases, which cleave substrates present in the soil and make the phosphate accessible (Liu et al., 2013). Moreover, the organic acid produced by AMF solubilizes insoluble mineral phosphate into a soluble form (Lapeyrie, 1988). In addition, AMFs help to release P from rock phosphate (RP) fertilizer. RP has low effectiveness. This is due to when added as fertilizer only one part is accessible to the plants and the remaining part is converted into insoluble fixed forms (Billah et al., 2019). Thus, AMF can solubilize insoluble phosphate from RP to make it available in the soil (Andrino et al., 2021). AMF converts the insoluble P into soluble forms through their production of acids during their metabolic activities (Kalayu, 2019). However, little is known about whether there is an activator dose of P that allows AMF to initiate root infection. Because it is known that a rate of 50 kg N ha−1 is the starter dose to activate rhizobium symbiosis.
Contribution of AMF on Soil Nitrogen Availability
Like phosphorus, nitrogen (N) is a vital part of plants. It is a constituent of phospholipids, coenzymes, and amino acids (Hawkesford et al., 2012). In the soil, N is present in organic and mineral forms (nitrites, nitrates, and ammonium ions). The ammonium form is weakly absorbed by plants that prefer nitrogen in the form of nitrate (). AMF helps to mobilize the inorganic form of nitrogen ( from the soil (Casieri et al., 2013). The AMF mycelium is able to absorb nitrogen in the form of ammonium ions (), in the form of nitrates (), and in the form of amino acids (Chen et al., 2018; Drechsler et al., 2018; Jansa et al., 2019). Nitrogen availability requires the activity of local transporters in the AMF hyphae. It has also been demonstrated that mycorrhizal associations could play a significant role in the decomposition and mineralization of plant organic matter and mobilize nutrients, particularly nitrogen, for the benefit of the host plant (Lambers et al., 2008). However, more research should be conducted in a controlled environment to determine the quantity of nitrogen that transits through the AMF mycelia network. Moreover, a study should be carried out to determine whether AMFs use nitrogen from the soil or from the host plant.
Contribution of AMF on the Soil Carbon Cycle and C Sequestration
Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Fungi play an essential role in the global C cycle. AMF hyphae are involved in C translocation into the soil and provide a key link in the terrestrial C cycle (Finlay, 2008). Indeed, AMF is an efficient agent to improve carbon sequestration in a mechanism of translocation C away from the high respiratory activity around the root and into the soil aggregations (Zhu and Miller, 2003). It has been demonstrated that mycorrhizal roots create a sink demand for carbon. When the atmospheric CO2 increases, the allocation of C from the plants to AMF also increases and stimulates the growth of AMF (Drigo et al., 2010). This C demand is provided by the host plant from the C fixed through photosynthesis (Parihar et al., 2020). In addition, AMF extramatrical hyphae represent 20–80% soil microbial biomass which consists of 15% of soil organic C (Kabir et al., 1997; Leake et al., 2004). As discussed above, AMF plays also a critical in the formation and maintenance of soil aggregations through the production of Glomalin. This glomalin protects organic matter from microbial degradation, increases the hydrophobicity and stability of macro-aggregations, which control soil carbon loss and increase soil carbon stocks (C sequestration; Wilson et al., 2009; Rillig et al., 2010). More studies are needed to distinguish the role of AMF in the dynamics of soils carbon sequestration. This involves in particular determining the quantity of carbon fixed by the AMF because this lack of knowledge means that AMF cannot currently be included in the models of reducing the rate of atmospheric carbon. In addition, limited information is available on the regulation of carbon to nutrient exchange across the mycorrhizal interface.
Contribution of AMF on Soil Trace Elements Transfer
Trace elements play roles in enzymatic activities involved in photosynthesis, oxidative respiration, protection against free radicals, or even lipid biosynthesis (Dominguez-Nuñez et al., 2016). It is known that AMF allows better absorption of low mobile trace elements in soils, such as potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), and cobalt (Co) (Garcia et al., 2016; Hashem et al., 2018). For instance, according to Krishna and Bagyaraj (1984), the level of Zn, Fe, and Mn is twice in mycorrhizal peanut plants compared to non-mycorrhizal plants. It has also been revealed that mycorrhizal inoculation improved Zn and Cu nutrition in soybeans and clover (Schoeneberger et al., 1989). However, when some of these elements are present in high quantities and therefore possess a toxic character, the mycorrhization can play a role in the protection of the plant, by strong retention of these elements (Liu et al., 2000). Besides trace elements, more research studies are needed on the role of AMF to synthesize or transport phyto-hormones (auxin, cytokinins, gibberellic acid, etc.) and antibiotics from plant to plant and from plant to soil microorganisms.
Role of AMF on Improving Soil Biological Properties
Microorganisms are one of the most important soil components. These microorganisms interact between them and with their environment to contribute to the functioning of the soil and thus participate in the provision of ecosystem services necessary for our survival (plant production, purification of pollutants, etc.; Nielsen et al., 2011). Soil is therefore a continually active biological reactor where diverse biochemical reactions and essential ecological processes happen (solubilization of organic matter, the biogeochemical cycles of the elements, etc.; Gessner et al., 2010). The microbial activities in the soils contribute to its fertility through synergy between microorganisms, competition, and parasitism (Topalović and Vestergård, 2021). Within the soil, AMFs interact with a wide range of microorganisms to better improve soil fertility. It has been demonstrated that the secretions of AMF influence the composition and activity of microbial communities in the rhizosphere (Veresoglou and Rillig, 2012). The biological activities of AMF lead to the appearance of a positive, neutral, or negative relationship between AMFs and other soil microorganisms.
Many microbial components of the soil work synergistically with AMF, promoting the growth and protection of plants (Gryndler, 2000; Barea et al., 2002). The positive interactions involve the nutrient acquisition, biological control of root pathogens, improvement of plant tolerance to abiotic stresses, and soil fertility. AMF communities influence the physicochemical environment of the rhizosphere and control various soil microbial interactions (Alimi et al., 2021). Mycorrhization directly affects the quantity and quality of root exudates. These exudates influence the composition of the microflora of the rhizosphere (Baltrus, 2017). Table 1 shows some examples of interactions between AMFs and other microorganisms. However, these interactions depend on several factors, such as the amounts of phosphorus and nitrogen available (Larimer et al., 2014). This is confirmed by Wang et al. (2011) and Xu et al. (2018) who demonstrated a synergistic relationship between AMF and the bacterial (i.e., rhizobia) and fungal communities depends on N and P status in the soil. However, there is a lack of information and pending questions which need to be answered. How soil microorganisms may hamper or totally inhibit the activities and functioning of AMF? What is the role of AMF in the trophic chain? In another word, can AMFs subject to any kind of predation or parasitism from soil microorganisms? In addition, a study on AMF and free native nematode interactions and their impact on the development of cereal crops under water stress conditions are also needed.
Table 1
| Interactions AMF + microbes | Mechanisms | Effects | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMF and Pseudomonas fluorescens | Glomus intraradice (AMF) stimulates the production of antibiotic (2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol) by Pseudomonas fluorescens. | The antibiotic protects the host plants against Gaeumannomyces graminis. | Ma et al., 2019 |
| AMF and saprotrophic fungi | AMF increase the biomass of saprotrophic fungi. | Dissolution of soil organic matter into mineral matter. | Albertsen et al., 2006; Carteron et al., 2021 |
| AMF and Gram-positive/negative bacteria | AMF has a deletion effect on certain Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. | This interaction affects the production of bioactive metabolites and the decomposition of organic matter. | Welc et al., 2010 |
| AMF and Rhizobia | AMF work in synergy with Rhizobia | Provide legumes woody and crop legumes (Faba bean) with essential soil nutrients | Chatarpaul et al., 1989; Xavier and Germida, 2002 |
| AMF, Rhizobia, and phosphorus solubilizing microorganisms (PSM) | Tripartite relationship. Solubilize P by mineralization, low soil pH, chelation and production of phosphatase, organic acid and proton. | Improve host plant phosphorus uptake. | Afkhami and Stinchcombe, 2016; Kalayu, 2019; Nacoon et al., 2020 |
| AMF and Mycorrhization Helper Bacteria (MHB) | MHB help: in the receptivity of the root to the AMF, in root-AMF recognition, in AMF growth, in the modification of the rhizospheric soil, and in the germination of AMF propagules. | Beneficial effect of bacteria on mycorrhizae. Improve soil fertility and nutrients uptake by the host plants. | Rigamonte et al., 2010 |
| AMF and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) | AMF work in synergy with PGPR to stimulate Ammonia production, N fixation, solubilization of mineral phosphate, and other essential nutrients, production of plant hormones. Accumulate ascorbate peroxidase and glutathione peroxidase. Secrete organic acids responsible for dissolving phosphorus phytate mineralization and inorganic P solubilisation. PGPR found in AMF mycelia produce siderophore and indol acetic acid production. | Soil fertility and plant growth. Increase the diversity and abundance of soil parasite antagonists. Mitigate water deficit damage and improve water stress tolerance (i.e., Cupressus arizonica). | Linderman, 2000; Ahemad and Kibret, 2014; Vafadar et al., 2014; Battini et al., 2016; Moreira et al., 2020 |
| AMF and Frankia | Synergistic interaction between AMF and Frankia (nitrogen-fixing actinobacteria). | Improve actinorhizal plants' height, the numbers and dry weight of root nodules, leaf area, shoot height, total biomass, and N and P leaf contents (i.e., Alnus glutinosa). | Oliveira et al., 2005 |
| AMF and Bacillus subtilis | AMF stimulate the production of nitrate and nitrite reductase and nitrogenase activities and osmoprotectants such as glycine, betaine, and proline by Bacillus subtilis. | Increase shoot and root dry weight, nodule number, and leghemoglobin content. | Hashem et al., 2017 |
Examples of some interactions between AMF and soil microorganisms.
AMF, Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Fungi.
Influence of Crop and Soil Management Practices on the AMF Functioning and Performing Various Soil Functions
Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Fungi improve soil health by improving its physical, chemical, and biological health. The previous sections have described its role in nutrient cycling and interaction with other soil microorganisms. However, agriculture practices significantly impact AMF communities and their performance, influencing various soil functions. This section will discuss some crop and soil management practices and their influence on AMF functioning and performing activities in the soil.
Impact of Crop Management on AMF
To maintain and improve nutrient availability and soil health and minimize pest and disease incidence, farmers use management strategies, such as crop rotation and intercropping, to achieve sustainable agriculture production. These two practices influence the diversity, abundance, and functioning of AMF in the soil. For instance, crop rotation increases the number of AMF spore density and root colonization in maize, and it also increases wheat yield when the preceding crop is soybean or chickpea (Higo et al., 2013; Bakhshandeh et al., 2017). These positive effects are not the effects of leguminous nitrogen fixation but rather due to higher AMF activities in the soil (Bakhshandeh et al., 2017). However, crop rotation with non-mycorrhizal crops, such as the Brassica family, reduces the abundance of AMF in the soil and the symbiotic benefits conferred to the crops through the production of antimicrobial isothiocyanates (Valetti et al., 2016). Moreover, some plants are more mycorrhizal-dependent than others. For instance, maize crop is more mycotrope than soybean (Troeh and Loynachan, 2003; Wang et al., 2016), while wheat is considered a non-mycorrhizal or mycorrhizal plant species depending on the cultivar (Hetrick et al., 1993; Stefani et al., 2020). Wheat cultivars respond differently to AMF inoculation in terms of growth, root colonization, and carbon for nutrient exchange; depending on the age of a cultivar, old cultivars benefit more consistently from AMF than new cultivars that effectively exploit highly fertilized systems with less reliance on symbiosis (García de León et al., 2020). This mechanism is known as a mycorrhizal dependency, whereby AMF presence in the soil affects the growth response of plant species differentially (Kandhasamy et al., 2020). In addition, intercropping various plant species in similar conditions impacts the composition of the community and diversity of AMF and the plant diversity. Indeed, AMF is involved in transporting plant assimilates from the dominant species to plant species subordinated through the AMF mycelium network (Egerton-Warburton et al., 2007). Therefore, the presence of AMF impacts the type of vegetation, the relative abundance of plant species, and their diversity (Yadav et al., 2020). This mechanism operates through a change in the soil microorganisms and soil properties (soil structure; Liu L. et al., 2020). AMF influences soil microbiota through mycelium products and biophysical mechanisms, such as enmeshment and alignment. All these mechanisms occur in a complex interaction process that involves various factors in a cycling way. However, we need to carry more research studies at the field level to really understand the impact of plant biodiversity on AMF diversity and functioning.
Impact of Soil Management Practice on AMF
Soil management practices have a significant impact on soil properties and microbial diversity. Mineral fertilizer, chemical pesticides, and herbicides applications are essential for crop nutrition, and they replenish the soil nutrients pool removed or harvested by crops, weed control, and pest management (Rana et al., 2019). However, high- and long-term inorganic fertilizer application reduces the plant's dependency on AMF, subsequently, mycorrhizal diversity, and abundance (Kour et al., 2020). This phenomenon can be explained by the fact that the symbiotic relationship between the plant and AMF is energetically costly for the plant; therefore, when the soil is rich in nutrients, plants allocate fewer carbohydrates to AMF, which ultimately affects the spore development and hyphae production (Tian et al., 2013). Soil phosphorus plays the most significant role in regulating plant mycorrhizal symbiosis (Kowalska et al., 2015). Thus, high P application negatively affects root colonization and AMF diversity (Cheng et al., 2013). On the other side, low fertilizer application optimizes the plant mycorrhizal symbiosis (Rana et al., 2020). For instance, Liu et al. (2016) found that P application in nutrient-deprived soil improves the mycorrhizal-mediated benefits to the plant. In addition, organic fertilizer application also has both positive and negative impacts on AMF diversity (Liu J. et al., 2020). According to Zhu et al. (2016), organic matter improves the AMF community composition in the rhizosphere of maize. In the same vein, inorganic pesticide and herbicide applications also have both positive and negative effects on AMF. These effects are mediated by the secretion of active substances up taken by plants via root or hyphal from the rhizosphere (Hage-Ahmed et al., 2019). For instance, azoxystrobin and glyphosate, respectively, fungicide and herbicide, inhibit the spore germination of some AMF species (Buysens et al., 2015). In addition to the chemical application, extensive tillage greatly influences the community composition of AMF by reducing mycelium extension, colonization rate, and diversity structure (Säle et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2015). This is due to the effects of tillage on the soil's permeability, texture, and microbial food substrates, which ultimately affect the soil microbiota activity and their habitat type (Wang et al., 2020). Several studies demonstrated that conservation or zero tillage improves AMF diversity and abundance, resulting in better plant growth (Qin et al., 2017; Gu et al., 2020). However, a study carried out in a Mediterranean agroecosystem found that AMF spore density or extraradical mycelium density is not affected by conventional tillage practices (Curaqueo et al., 2011). These contradicting results indicate that the effects of different chemical applications and tillage practices on AMF still need further studies to understand better the effect of different soil management practices on soil AMF.
Conclusion and Future Areas of Research
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi appear to be one of the most important soil organisms to take into account. AMFs are involved in plant mineral nutrition, water absorption, and protection against biotic and abiotic stresses in plants. Despite the fact that the importance of AMF in improving soil fertility is well-established, our understanding of the underlying mechanisms is still limited. There are a few studies that simultaneously investigated the effects of AMF on the physical, chemical, and biological properties of the soil. Therefore, the current review provides a holistic overview of the existing information regarding the role of AMF symbiotic relationships with crops in improving the physical, chemical, and biological properties of the soil. Regarding the impact of AMF on soil fertility, we highlighted several mechanisms, such as the production of glomalin, which is beneficial to the accumulation and circulation of soil carbon and enhances soil stability. In addition, the beneficial interaction between AMF with other soil microorganisms, such as PSB, which produce phosphatase and mineralize organic P, was highlighted. However, some of the functions involved in this symbiosis that determine the performance of AMF in the soil should be addressed in future studies.
Future studies are required to characterize the soil P and N critical threshold below which AMF establishes symbiosis and above which AMFs are not active on a broader range of plant-AMF species combinations, soil types, and edaphic conditions.
Furthermore, future research should investigate the regulation of N and its uptake from the soil during AMF symbiosis by using molecular tools, such as transcriptomic, gnomonic, and the development of fungal mutants.
Further attention is needed on the role of glomalin in improving carbon sequestration efficiency from various climate and soil types to expedite its use in solving soil degradation problems that will be worsened by prevailing climate disturbances. Assessing the accumulation and lifespan of glomalin in soil fertility parameters under different climate, land use, and management conditions is of critical importance.
It is well-established that the interactions between AMF and certain soil microorganisms are beneficial to soil fertility; however, the interaction between AMF and free native nematode and their impact on soil structure under drought stress calls further research.
The role of AMF in the synthesis or transport of phytohormones, such as auxin, cytokinins, gibberellic acid, and antibiotics from plant to plant and from plant to soil microorganisms, is also poorly understood. Therefore, studies targeting the identification and characterization of such AMF function are paramount.
Moreover, the role of AMF in soil basal respiration is an interesting field to investigate.
Advances in our knowledge of the functions played by AMFs in the soil are partly hindered by the obligate biotrophic nature of these fungal microorganisms. Therefore, more field experiments on the impact of plant biodiversity on AMF diversity and functioning are necessary.
Moreover, future studies on the effects of different soil management practices (i.e., tillage) and chemical applications on AMF functioning and performance in the soil are important.
All these research topics should be based on new approaches, such as recent methodological advances in physiology, molecular biotechnology, and agroecology integrated into both laboratory and field conditions. Such interventions are paramount to our ability to establish a new “green revolution” aligned to the requirements for achieving a sustainable development ingrained in agricultural production.
Funding
This work has been funded by Regional Academic Exchange for Enhanced Skills in Fragile Ecosystem Management in Africa (REFORM) grant number: 2017–2861.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
AFF contributed on inception of the paper, research, and writing. GN contributed on inception and reviews of the paper. JS contributed on inception and reviews. HFM contributed on inception and reviewed the work. SOA contributed on write up. AB contributed on write up and the revision of the manuscript. AN and KN reviewed the work. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AfkhamiM. E.StinchcombeJ. R. (2016). Multiple mutualist effects on genomewide expression in the tripartite association between Medicago truncatula, nitrogen-fixing bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi. Mol. Ecol. 25, 4946–4962. 10.1111/mec.13809
2
AgledalL.NiereM.ZieglerM. (2013). The phosphate makes a difference: cellular functions of NADP. Redox Rep.15, 2–10. 10.1179/174329210X12650506623122
3
AhemadM.KibretM. (2014). Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Current perspective. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 26, 1–20. 10.1016/j.jksus.2013.05.001
4
AlbertsenA.RavnskovS.GreenH.JensenD. F.LarsenJ. (2006). Interactions between the external mycelium of the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices and other soil microorganisms as affected by organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem.38, 1008–1014. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.015
5
AlimiA.AdelekeR.MoteeteeA. (2021). Soil environmental factors shape the rhizosphere arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in South African indigenous legumes (Fabaceae). Biodivers. J. Biol. Divers.22, 2466–2476. 10.13057/biodiv/d220503
6
AmanullahA.ZakirullahM. (2010). Timing and rate of phosphorus application influence maize phenology, yield and profitability in Northwest Pakistan. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. H Bot.1, 29–39. 10.21608/eajbsh.2010.17014
7
AndersonR.KeshwaniD.GuruA.YangH.IrmakS.SubbiahJ. (2018). An integrated modeling framework for crop and biofuel systems using the DSSAT and GREET models. Environ. Model. Softw.108, 40–50. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.07.004
8
AndrinoA.GuggenbergerG.SauheitlL.BurkartS.BoyJ. (2021). Carbon investment into mobilization of mineral and organic phosphorus by arbuscular mycorrhiza. Biol. Fertil. Soils57, 47–64. 10.1007/s00374-020-01505-5
9
BakhshandehS.CorneoP. E.MariotteP.KerteszM. A.DijkstraF. A. (2017). Effect of crop rotation on mycorrhizal colonization and wheat yield under different fertilizer treatments. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.247, 130–136. 10.1016/j.agee.2017.06.027
10
BalemiT.NegishoK. (2012). Management of soil phosphorus and plant adaptation mechanisms to phosphorus stress for sustainable crop production: a review. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.12, 547–562. 10.4067/S0718-95162012005000015
11
BaltrusD. A. (2017). Adaptation, specialization, and coevolution within phytobiomes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 38, 109–116. 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.04.023
12
BareaJ. M.AzcónR.Azcón-AguilarC. (2002). Mycorrhizosphere interactions to improve plant fitness and soil quality. Antonie van Leeuwenh.81, 343–351. 10.1023/A:1020588701325
13
BattiniF.CristaniC.GiovannettiM.AgnolucciM. (2016). Multifunctionality and diversity of culturable bacterial communities strictly associated with spores of the plant beneficial symbiont Rhizophagus intraradices. Microbiol. Res.183, 68–79. 10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.012
14
BeheraB. C.SingdevsachanS. K.MishraR. R.DuttaS. K.ThatoiH. N. (2014). Diversity, mechanism and biotechnology of phosphate solubilising microorganism in mangrove-a review. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol.3, 97–110. 10.1016/j.bcab.2013.09.008
15
BillahM.KhanM.BanoA.HassanT. U.MunirA.GurmaniA. R. (2019). Phosphorus and phosphate solubilizing bacteria: keys for sustainable agriculture. Geomicrobiol. J.36, 904–916. 10.1080/01490451.2019.1654043
16
BonfanteP.DesiròA. (2015). Arbuscular mycorrhizas: The lives of beneficial fungi and their plant hosts, in Principles of Plant-Microbe Interactions, ed LugtenbergB. (Cham: Springer), 235–245. 10.1007/978-3-319-08575-3_25
17
BrundrettM. C. (2009). Mycorrhizal associations and other means of nutrition of vascular plants: understanding the global diversity of host plants by resolving conflicting information and developing reliable means of diagnosis. Plant Soil320, 37–77. 10.1007/s11104-008-9877-9
18
BuysensC.De BouloisH. D.DeclerckS. (2015). Do fungicides used to control Rhizoctonia solani impact the non-target arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis?Mycorrhiza25, 277–288. 10.1007/s00572-014-0610-7
19
CarteronA.BeigasM.JolyS.TurnerB. L.LalibertéE. (2021). Temperate forests dominated by arbuscular or ectomycorrhizal fungi are characterized by strong shifts from saprotrophic to mycorrhizal fungi with increasing soil depth. Microb. Ecol.82, 377–390. 10.1007/s00248-020-01540-7
20
CasieriL.LahmidiN. A.DoidyJ.Veneault-FourreyC.MigeonA.BonneauL.et al. (2013). Biotrophic transportome in mutualistic plant-fungal interactions. Mycorrhiza23, 597–625. 10.1007/s00572-013-0496-9
21
ChatarpaulL.ChakravartyP.SubramaniamP. (1989). Studies in tetrapartite symbioses. Plant Soil118, 145–150. 10.1007/BF02232800
22
ChenA.GuM.WangS.ChenJ.XuG. (2018). Transport properties and regulatory roles of nitrogen in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.74, 80–88. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.06.015
23
ChengY.IshimotoK.KuriyamaY.OsakiM.EzawaT. (2013). Ninety-year-, but not single, application of phosphorus fertilizer has a major impact on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Plant Soil365, 397–407. 10.1007/s11104-012-1398-x
24
CondronL. M.SpearsB. M.HaygarthP. M.TurnerB. L.RichardsonA. E. (2013). Role of legacy phosphorus in improving global phosphorus-use efficiency. Environ. Dev.8, 147–148. 10.1016/j.envdev.2013.09.003
25
CuraqueoG.BareaJ. M.AcevedoE.RubioR.CornejoP.BorieF. (2011). Effects of different tillage system on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal propagules and physical properties in a Mediterranean agroecosystem in central Chile. Soil Till. Res.113, 11–18. 10.1016/j.still.2011.02.004
26
Dal CortivoC.BarionG.FerrariM.VisioliG.DramisL.PanozzoA.et al. (2018). Effects of field inoculation with VAM and bacteria consortia on root growth and nutrients uptake in common wheat. Sustainability10:3286. 10.3390/su10093286
27
de NovaisC. B.AvioL.GiovannettiM.de FariaS. M.SiqueiraJ. O.SbranaC. (2019). Interconnectedness, length and viability of arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelium as affected by selected herbicides and fungicides. Appl. Soil Ecol. 143, 144–152. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.06.013
28
DemenoisJ.ReyF.IbanezT.StokesA.CarricondeF. (2018). Linkages between root traits, soil fungi and aggregate stability in tropical plant communities along a successional vegetation gradient. Plant Soil424, 319–334. 10.1007/s11104-017-3529-x
29
DewitteO.JonesA.SpaargarenO.Breuning-MadsenH.BrossardM.DamphaA.et al. (2013). Harmonisation of the soil map of Africa at the continental scale. Geoderma211, 138–153. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.07.007
30
DiagneN.NdourM.DjighalyP. I.NgomD.NgomM. C. N.NdongG.et al. (2020). Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on salt stress tolerance of Casuarina obesa (Miq.). Front. Sustain. Food Syst.4:266. 10.3389/fsufs.2020.601004
31
DobbelaereS.VanderleydenJ.OkonY. (2003). Plant growth-promoting effects of diazotrophs in the rhizosphere. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.22, 107–149. 10.1080/713610853
32
Dominguez-NuñezJ. A.BenitoB.Berrocal-LoboM.AlbanesiA. (2016). Mycorrhizal fungi: Role in the solubilization of potassium, in Potassium Solubilizing Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture, eds MeenaV.MauryaB.VermaJ.MeenaR (New Delhi: Springer), 77–98. 10.1007/978-81-322-2776-2_6
33
DrechslerN.CourtyP. E.BruléD.KunzeR. (2018). Identification of arbuscular mycorrhiza-inducible Nitrate Transporter 1/Peptide Transporter Family (NPF) genes in rice. Mycorrhiza28, 93–100. 10.1007/s00572-017-0802-z
34
DrigoB.PijlA. S.DuytsH.KielakA. M.GamperH. A.HoutekamerM. J.et al. (2010). Shifting carbon flow from roots into associated microbial communities in response to elevated atmospheric CO2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.107, 10938–10942. 10.1073/pnas.0912421107
35
DuponnoisR.OuahmaneL.KaneA.ThioulouseJ.HafidiM.BoumezzoughA.et al. (2011). Nurse shrubs increased the early growth of Cupressus seedlings by enhancing belowground mutualism and soil microbial activity. Soil Biol. Biochem.43, 2160–2168. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.06.020
36
Egerton-WarburtonL. M.QuerejetaJ. I.AllenM. F. (2007). Common mycorrhizal networks provide a potential pathway for the transfer of hydraulically lifted water between plants. J. Exp. Bot.58, 1473–1483. 10.1093/jxb/erm009
37
EtesamiH.JeongB. R. (2021). Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, and silicon to P uptake by plant: a review. Front. Plant Sci.12:1355. 10.3389/fpls.2021.699618
38
FinlayR. D. (2008). Ecological aspects of mycorrhizal symbiosis: with special emphasis on the functional diversity of interactions involving the extraradical mycelium. J. Exp. Bot.59, 1115–1126. 10.1093/jxb/ern059
39
García de LeónD.VahterT.ZobelM.KoppelM.EdesiL.DavisonJ.et al. (2020). Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms. PLoS ONE15:0233878. 10.1371/journal.pone.0233878
40
GarciaK.DoidyJ.ZimmermannS. D.WipfD.CourtyP. E. (2016). Take a trip through the plant and fungal transportome of mycorrhiza. Trends Plant Sci.21, 937–950. 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.07.010
41
GessnerM. O.SwanC. M.DangC. K.McKieB. G.BardgettR. D.WallD. H.et al. (2010). Diversity meets decomposition. Trends Ecol. Evol.25, 372–380. 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.010
42
GianinazziS.GollotteA.BinetM. N.van TuinenD.RedeckerD.WipfD. (2010). Agroecology: the key role of arbuscular mycorrhizas in ecosystem services. Mycorrhiza20, 519–530. 10.1007/s00572-010-0333-3
43
GryndlerM. (2000). Interactions of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with other soil organisms, in Arbuscular Mycorrhizas: Physiology and Function, eds KapulnikYDoudsD. D. (Dordrecht: Springer), 239–262. 10.1007/978-94-017-0776-3_11
44
GuS.WuS.GuanY.ZhaiC.ZhangZ.BelloA.et al. (2020). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community was affected by tillage practices rather than residue management in black soil of Northeast China. Soil Till. Res.198:104552. 10.1016/j.still.2019.104552
45
Hage-AhmedK.RosnerK.SteinkellnerS. (2019). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and their response to pesticides. Pest Manage. Sci.75, 583–590. 10.1002/ps.5220
46
HamelC.PlenchetteC. (2017). Implications of past, current, and future agricultural practices for mycorrhiza-mediated nutrient flux, in Mycorrhizal Mediation of Soil, eds JohnsonN. C.GehringC.JansaJ. (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 175–186. 10.1016/B978-0-12-804312-7.00010-3
47
HashemA.Abd_AllahE. F.AlqarawiA. A.RadhakrishnanR.KumarA. (2017). Plant defense approach of Bacillus subtilis (BERA 71) against Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid in mung bean. J. Plant Interact.12, 390–401. 10.1080/17429145.2017.1373871
48
HashemA.AlqarawiA. A.RadhakrishnanR.Al-ArjaniA. B. F.AldehaishH. A.EgamberdievaD.et al. (2018). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi regulate the oxidative system, hormones and ionic equilibrium to trigger salt stress tolerance in Cucumis sativus L. Saudi J. Biol. Sci.25, 1102–1114. 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.03.009
49
HawkesfordM.HorstW.KicheyT.LambersH.SchjoerringJ.MøllerI. S.et al. (2012). Functions of macronutrients, in Marschner's Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, ed MarschnerP. (Cambridge: Academic Press), 135–189. 10.1016/B978-0-12-384905-2.00006-6
50
HetrickB. A. D.WilsonG. W. T.CoxT. S. (1993). Mycorrhizal dependence of modern wheat cultivars and ancestors: A synthesis. Can. J. Bot. 71, 512–518. 10.1139/b93-056
51
HigoM.IsobeK.YamaguchiM.DrijberR. A.JeskeE. S.IshiiR. (2013). Diversity and vertical distribution of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under two soybean rotational systems. Biol. Fertil. Soils49, 1085–1096. 10.1007/s00374-013-0807-5
52
HuD.BaskinJ. M.BaskinC. C.WangZ.ZhangS.YangX.et al. (2019). Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and achene mucilage have independent functions in seedling growth of a desert shrub. J. Plant Physiol.232, 1–11. 10.1016/j.jplph.2018.11.010
53
HumphreysC. P.FranksP. J.ReesM.BidartondoM. I.LeakeJ. R. Beerling, D. J. (2010). Mutualistic mycorrhiza-like symbiosis in the most ancient group of land plants. Nat. Commun. 1, 1–7. 10.1038/ncomms1105
54
JamiołkowskaA.KsiezniakA.GałazkaA.HetmanB.KopackiM.Skwaryło-BednarzB. (2018). Impact of abiotic factors on development of the community of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the soil: a review. Int. Agrophys.32:133. 10.1515/intag-2016-0090
55
JansaJ.ForczekS. T.RozmošM.PüschelD.BukovskáP.HršelováH. (2019). Arbuscular mycorrhiza and soil organic nitrogen: network of players and interactions. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric.6, 1–10. 10.1186/s40538-019-0147-2
56
JavotH.PumplinN.HarrisonM. J. (2007). Phosphate in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: transport properties and regulatory roles. Plant Cell Environ.30, 310–322. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01617.x
57
KabirZ.O'halloranI. P.FylesJ. W.HamelC. (1997). Seasonal changes of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as affected by tillage practices and fertilization: hyphal density and mycorrhizal root colonization. Plant Soil192, 285–293. 10.1023/A:1004205828485
58
KaiserC.KilburnM. R.ClodeP. L.FuchsluegerL.KorandaM.CliffJ. B.et al. (2015). Exploring the transfer of recent plant photosynthates to soil microbes: mycorrhizal pathway vs. direct root exudation. New Phytol.205, 1537–1551. 10.1111/nph.13138
59
KalayuG. (2019). Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms: promising approach as biofertilizers. Int. J. Agron.2019:4917256. 10.1155/2019/4917256
60
KandhasamyN.RavichandranK. R.ThangaveluM. (2020). Interactive influence of soil and plant genotypes on mycorrhizal dependency in finger millet. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.20, 1287–1297. 10.1007/s42729-020-00212-2
61
KeymerA.PimprikarP.WewerV.HuberC.BrandsM.BuceriusS. L.et al. (2017). Lipid transfer from plants to arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi. Elife6, e29107. 10.7554/eLife.29107.002
62
KhanM. S.ZaidiA. (2007). Synergistic effects of the inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on the performance of wheat. Turkish J. Agric. For.31, 355–362. Available online at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.835.1182&rep=rep1&type=pdf
63
KourD.RanaK. L.KaurT.YadavN.HalderS. K.YadavA. N.et al. (2020). Potassium solubilizing and mobilizing microbes: biodiversity, mechanisms of solubilization, and biotechnological implication for alleviations of abiotic stress, in New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering, eds RastegariA. A.YadavA. N.YadavN. (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 177–202. 10.1016/B978-0-12-820526-6.00012-9
64
KowalskaI.KoniecznyA.GastołM.SadyW.Hanus-FajerskaE. (2015). Effect of mycorrhiza and phosphorus content in nutrient solution on the yield and nutritional status of tomato plants grown on rockwool or coconut coir. Agric. Food Sci.24, 39–51. 10.23986/afsci.47204
65
KrishnaK. R.BagyarajD. J. (1984). Growth and nutrient uptake of peanut inoculated with the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus fasciculatum compared with non-inoculated ones. Plant Soil77, 405–408. 10.1007/BF02182946
66
KrügerM.KrügerC.WalkerC.StockingerH.SchüßlerA. (2012). Phylogenetic reference data for systematics and phylotaxonomy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from phylum to species level. New Phytol.193, 970–984. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03962.x
67
LambersH.RavenJ. A.ShaverG. R.SmithS. E. (2008). Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age. Trends Ecol. Evol.23, 95–103. 10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.008
68
LapeyrieF. (1988). Oxalate synthesis from soil bicarbonate by the mycorrhizal fungus Paxillus involutus. Plant Soil110, 3–8. 10.1007/BF02143532
69
LarimerA. L.ClayK.BeverJ. D. (2014). Synergism and context dependency of interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia with a prairie legume. Ecology95, 1045–1054. 10.1890/13-0025.1
70
LeakeJ.JohnsonD.DonnellyD.MuckleG.BoddyL.ReadD. (2004). Networks of power and influence: the role of mycorrhizal mycelium in controlling plant communities and agroecosystem functioning. Can. J. Bot.82, 1016–1045. 10.1139/b04-060
71
LehmannJ.HanselC. M.KaiserC.KleberM.MaherK.ManzoniS.et al. (2020). Persistence of soil organic carbon caused by functional complexity. Nat. Geosci.13, 529–534. 10.1038/s41561-020-0612-3
72
LindermanR. G. (2000). Effects of mycorrhizas on plant tolerance to diseases, in Arbuscular Mycorrhizas: Physiology and Function, eds KapulnikY.DoudsD. D. (Dordrecht: Springer), 345–365. 10.1007/978-94-017-0776-3_15
73
LiuA.HamelC.HamiltonR. I.MaB. L.SmithD. L. (2000). Acquisition of Cu, Zn, Mn and Fe by mycorrhizal maize (Zea mays L.) grown in soil at different P and micronutrient levels. Mycorrhiza9, 331–336. 10.1007/s005720050277
74
LiuJ.ZhangJ.LiD.XuC.XiangX. (2020). Differential responses of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities to mineral and organic fertilization. Microbiol. Open9:e00920. 10.1002/mbo3.920
75
LiuL.ZhangT.GilliamF. S.GundersenP.ZhangW.ChenH.et al. (2013). Interactive effects of nitrogen and phosphorus on soil microbial communities in a tropical forest. PLoS ONE8:e61188. 10.1371/journal.pone.0061188
76
LiuL.ZhuK.WurzburgerN.ZhangJ. (2020). Relationships between plant diversity and soil microbial diversity vary across taxonomic groups and spatial scales. Ecosphere11:e02999. 10.1002/ecs2.2999
77
LiuW.ZhangY.JiangS.DengY.ChristieP.MurrayP. J.et al. (2016). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil and roots respond differently to phosphorus inputs in an intensively managed calcareous agricultural soil. Sci. Rep.6, 1–11. 10.1038/srep24902
78
LucyM.ReedE.GlickB. R. (2004). Applications of free living plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenh.86, 1–25. 10.1023/B:ANTO.0000024903.10757.6e
79
LuginbuehlL. H.MenardG. N.KurupS.Van ErpH.RadhakrishnanG. V.BreakspearA.et al. (2017). Fatty acids in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are synthesized by the host plant. Science356, 1175–1178. 10.1126/science.aan0081
80
MaY.LátrA.RochaI.FreitasH.VosátkaM.OliveiraR. S. (2019). Delivery of inoculum of Rhizophagus irregularis via seed coating in combination with Pseudomonas libanensis for cowpea production. Agronomy9, 33. 10.3390/agronomy9010033
81
MahantaD.RaiR. K.DharS.VargheseE.RajaA.PurakayasthaT. J. (2018). Modification of root properties with phosphate solubilizing bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhiza to reduce rock phosphate application in soybean-wheat cropping system. Ecol. Eng.111, 31–43. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.11.008
82
MontanarellaL.PennockD. J.McKenzieN.BadraouiM.ChudeV.BaptistaI.et al. (2016). World's soils are under threat. Soil2, 79–82. 10.5194/soil-2-79-2016
83
MoreiraH.PereiraS. I.VegaA.CastroP. M.MarquesA. P. (2020). Synergistic effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting bacteria benefit maize growth under increasing soil salinity. J. Environ. Manage.257:109982. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109982
84
MubekaphiC. (2019). Soil organic carbon, glomalin related soil protein and related physical properties after 15 years of different management practices in a subtropical region of South Africa (Doctoral thesis). University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
85
NacoonS.JogloyS.RiddechN.MongkolthanarukW.KuyperT. W.BoonlueS. (2020). Interaction between phosphate solubilizing bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth promotion and tuber inulin content of Helianthus tuberosus L. Sci. Rep.10, 1–10. 10.1038/s41598-020-61846-x
86
NielsenU. N.AyresE.WallD. H.BardgettR. D. (2011). Soil biodiversity and carbon cycling: a review and synthesis of studies examining diversity-function relationships. Eur. J. Soil Sci.62, 105–116. 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01314.x
87
NortonJ. M.PellegrinoE.GamperH. A.CiccoliniV.ErcoliL. (2020). Forage rotations conserve diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil fertility. Front. Microbiol.10:2969. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02969
88
OliveiraR. S.CastroP. M. L.DoddJ. C.VosátkaM. (2005). Synergistic effect of Glomus intraradices and Frankia spp. on the growth and stress recovery of Alnus glutinosa in an alkaline anthropogenic sediment. Chemosphere60, 1462–1470. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.01.038
89
OthmanR.PanhwarQ. A. (2014). Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria improves nutrient uptake in aerobic rice, in Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms, eds KhanM.ZaidiA.MusarratJ. (Cham: Springer). 207–224. 10.1007/978-3-319-08216-5
90
PariharM.RakshitA.MeenaV. S.GuptaV. K.RanaK.ChoudharyM.et al. (2020). The potential of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in C cycling: a review. Arch. Microbiol.202, 581–1596. 10.1007/s00203-020-01915-x
91
PrasadR.BholaD.AkdiK.CruzC.SairamK. V. S. S.TutejaN.et al. (2017). Introduction to mycorrhiza: historical development, in Mycorrhiza-Function, Diversity, State of the Art, eds VarmaA.PrasadR.TutejaN. (Cham: Springer), 1–7. 10.1007/978-3-319-53064-2_1
92
QinH.ChenJ.WuQ.NiuL.LiY.LiangC.et al. (2017). Intensive management decreases soil aggregation and changes the abundance and community compositions of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) forests. For. Ecol. Manage.400, 246–255. 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.06.003
93
RanaK. L.KourD.KaurT.SheikhI.YadavA. N.KumarV.et al. (2020). Endophytic microbes from diverse wheat genotypes and their potential biotechnological applications in plant growth promotion and nutrient uptake. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 90, 969–979. 10.1007/s40011-020-01168-0
94
RanaK. L.KourD.SheikhI.DhimanA.YadavN.YadavA. N.et al. (2019). Endophytic fungi: biodiversity, ecological significance, and potential industrial applications, in Recent Advancement in White Biotechnology Through Fungi, eds YadavA.MishraS.SinghS.GuptaA. (Cham: Springer), 1–62. 10.1007/978-3-030-10480-1_1
95
RedeckerD.SchüßlerA.StockingerH.StürmerS. L.MortonJ. B. Walker, C. (2013). An evidence-based consensus for the classification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota). Mycorrhiza23, 515–531. 10.1007/s00572-013-0486-y
96
RelwaniL.KrishnaP.ReddyM. S. (2008). Effect of carbon and nitrogen sources on phosphate solubilization by a wild-type strain and UV-induced mutants of Aspergillus tubingensis. Curr. Microbiol.57, 401–406. 10.1007/s00284-008-9212-y
97
RequejoM. I.Eichler-LöbermannB. (2014). Organic and inorganic phosphorus forms in soil as affected by long-term application of organic amendments. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.100, 245–255. 10.1007/s10705-014-9642-9
98
RigamonteT. A.PylroV. S.DuarteG. F. (2010). The role of mycorrhization helper bacteria in the establishment and action of ectomycorrhizae associations. Braz. J. Microbiol.41, 832–840. 10.1590/S1517-83822010000400002
99
RilligM. C.WagnerM.SalemM.AntunesP. M.GeorgeC.RamkeH. G.et al. (2010). Material derived from hydrothermal carbonization: Effects on plant growth and arbuscular mycorrhiza. Appl. Soil Ecol. 45, 238–242. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.04.011
100
RodriguesM.WithersP. J. A.SoltangheisiA.VargasV.HolzschuhM.PavinatoP. S. (2021). Tillage systems and cover crops affecting soil phosphorus bioavailability in Brazilian Cerrado Oxisols. Soil Till. Res.205:104770. 10.1016/j.still.2020.104770
101
RoweH.WithersP. J.BaasP.ChanN. I.DoodyD.HolimanJ.et al. (2016). Integrating legacy soil phosphorus into sustainable nutrient management strategies for future food, bioenergy and water security. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.104, 393–412. 10.1007/s10705-015-9726-1
102
SadhanaB. (2014). Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) as a biofertilizer-a review. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci3, 384–400. Available online at: https://www.ijcmas.com/vol-3-4/B.Sadhana.pdf
103
SäleV.AguileraP.LaczkoE.MäderP.BernerA.ZihlmannU.et al. (2015). Impact of conservation tillage and organic farming on the diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol. Biochem.84, 38–52. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.005
104
SattariS. Z.BouwmanA. F.GillerK. E.van IttersumM. K. (2012). Residual soil phosphorus as the missing piece in the global phosphorus crisis puzzle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.109, 6348–6353. 10.1073/pnas.1113675109
105
SchoenebergerM. M.VolkR. J.DaveyC. B. (1989). Selection of reference plants and methods for estimating N2 fixation in mycorrhizal leguminous plants. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.53, 1425–1429. 10.2136/sssaj1989.03615995005300050020x
106
SchüßlerA.WalkerC. (2010). The Glomeromycota: A Species List With New Families and New Genera. The Royal Botanic Garden Kew, Botanische Staatssammlung Munich, and Oregon State University.
107
ShenJ.YuanL.ZhangJ.LiH.BaiZ.ChenX.et al. (2011). Phosphorus dynamics: From soil to plant. Plant Physiol. 156, 997–1005. 10.1104/pp.111.175232
108
SinghA. K.ZhuX.ChenC.WuJ.YangB.ZakariS.et al. (2020). The role of glomalin in mitigation of multiple soil degradation problems. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1–35. 10.1080/10643389.2020.1862561
109
StefaniF.DupontS.LaterrièreM.KnoxR.RuanY.HamelC.et al. (2020). Similar arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in 31 durum wheat cultivars (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) under field conditions in Eastern Canada. Front. Plant Sci.11:1206. 10.3389/fpls.2020.01206
110
TaktekS.St-ArnaudM.Pich,éY.FortinJ. A.AntounH. (2017). Igneous phosphate rock solubilization by biofilm-forming mycorrhizobacteria and hyphobacteria associated with Rhizoglomus irregulare DAOM 197198. Mycorrhiza27, 13–22. 10.1007/s00572-016-0726-z
111
TarafdarJ. C.MarschnerH. (1994). Phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere and hyphosphere of VA mycorrhizal wheat supplied with inorganic and organic phosphorus. Soil Biol. Biochem.26, 387–395. 10.1016/0038-0717(94)90288-7
112
TianH.DrijberR. A.ZhangJ. L.LiX. L. (2013). Impact of long-term nitrogen fertilization and rotation with soybean on the diversity and phosphorus metabolism of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi within the roots of maize (Zea mays L.). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.164, 53–61. 10.1016/j.agee.2012.09.007
113
TopalovićO.VestergårdM. (2021). Can microorganisms assist the survival and parasitism of plant-parasitic nematodes?Trends Parasitol.37, 947–958. 10.1016/j.pt.2021.05.007
114
TroehZ. I.LoynachanT. E. (2003). Endomycorrhizal fungal survival in continuous corn, soybean, and fallow. Agron. J.95, 224–230. 10.2134/agronj2003.0224
115
VafadarF.AmooaghaieR.OtroshyM. (2014). Effects of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on plant growth, stevioside, NPK, and chlorophyll content of Stevia rebaudiana. J. Plant Interact.9, 128–136. 10.1080/17429145.2013.779035
116
ValettiL.IriarteL.FabraA. (2016). Effect of previous cropping of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) on soybean (Glycine max) root mycorrhization, nodulation, and plant growth. Eur. J. Soil Biol.76, 103–106. 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.08.005
117
VerbruggenE.Van Der HeijdenM. G.WeedonJ. T.KowalchukG. A.RölingW. F. (2012). Community assembly, species richness and nestedness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agricultural soils. Mol. Ecol. 21, 2341–2353. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05534.x
118
VeresoglouS. D.RilligM. C. (2012). Suppression of fungal and nematode plant pathogens through arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Biol. Lett.8, 214–217. 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0874
119
WangG.ShengL.ZhaoD.ShengJ.WangX.LiaoH. (2016). Allocation of nitrogen and carbon is regulated by nodulation and mycorrhizal networks in soybean/maize intercropping system. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1901. 10.3389/fpls.2016.01901
120
WangX.PanQ.ChenF.YanX.LiaoH. (2011). Effects of co-inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia on soybean growth as related to root architecture and availability of N and P. Mycorrhiza21, 173–181. 10.1007/s00572-010-0319-1
121
WangZ.LiY.LiT.ZhaoD.LiaoY. (2020). Conservation tillage decreases selection pressure on community assembly in the rhizosphere of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Sci. Tot. Environ.710:136326. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136326
122
WeiY.ZhaoY.FanY.LuQ.LiM.WeiQ.et al. (2017). Impact of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria inoculation methods on phosphorus transformation and long-term utilization in composting. Bioresour. Technol.241, 134–141. 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.099
123
WelcM.RavnskovS.Kieliszewska-RokickaB.LarsenJ. (2010). Suppression of other soil microorganisms by mycelium of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in root-free soil. Soil Biol. Biochem.42, 1534–1540. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.05.024
124
WilsonG. W.RiceC. W.RilligM. C.SpringerA.HartnettD. C. (2009). Soil aggregation and carbon sequestration are tightly correlated with the abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: Results from long term field experiments. Ecol. Lett. 12, 452–461. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01303.x
125
XavierL. J. C.GermidaJ. J. (2002). Response of lentil under controlled conditions to co-inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia varying in efficacy. Soil Biol. Biochem.34, 181–188. 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00165-1
126
XuJ.LiuS.SongS.GuoH.TangJ.YongJ. W.et al. (2018). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence decomposition and the associated soil microbial community under different soil phosphorus availability. Soil Biol. Biochem.120, 181–190. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.02.010
127
YadavA. N.RastegariA. A.YadavN.KourD. (2020). Advances in Plant Microbiome and Sustainable Agriculture.Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978-981-15-3208-5
128
ZhangL.ShiN.FanJ.WangF.GeorgeT. S.FengG. (2018). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi stimulate organic phosphate mobilization associated with changing bacterial community structure under field conditions. Environ. Microbiol.20, 2639–2651. 10.1111/1462-2920.14289
129
ZhangL.XuM.LiuY.ZhangF.HodgeA.FengG. (2016). Carbon and phosphorus exchange may enable cooperation between an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and a phosphate-solubilizing bacterium. New Phytol.210, 1022–1032. 10.1111/nph.13838
130
ZhaoR.GuoW.BiN.GuoJ.WangL.ZhaoJ.et al. (2015). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi affect the growth, nutrient uptake and water status of maize (Zea mays L.) grown in two types of coal mine spoils under drought stress. Appl. Soil Ecol.88, 41–49. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.11.016
131
ZhuC.LingN.GuoJ.WangM.GuoS.ShenQ. (2016). Impacts of fertilization regimes on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) community composition were correlated with organic matter composition in maize rhizosphere soil. Front. Microbiol.7:1840. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01840
132
ZhuJ.LiM.WhelanM. (2018). Phosphorus activators contribute to legacy phosphorus availability in agricultural soils: a review. Sci. Tot. Environ.612, 522–537. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.095
133
ZhuY. G.MillerR. M. (2003). Carbon cycling by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil-plant systems. Trends Plant Sci.8, 407–409. 10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00184-5
Summary
Keywords
macro-aggregation, microorganisms, glomalin, rock phosphate, P legacy
Citation
Fall AF, Nakabonge G, Ssekandi J, Founoune-Mboup H, Apori SO, Ndiaye A, Badji A and Ngom K (2022) Roles of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Soil Fertility: Contribution in the Improvement of Physical, Chemical, and Biological Properties of the Soil. Front. Fungal Biol. 3:723892. doi: 10.3389/ffunb.2022.723892
Received
11 June 2021
Accepted
19 January 2022
Published
07 March 2022
Volume
3 - 2022
Edited by
Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Italy
Reviewed by
Birinchi Kumar Sarma, Banaras Hindu University, India; Mahaveer P. Sharma, ICAR Indian Institute of Soybean Research, India; Ees Ahmad, National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms (ICAR), India
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Fall, Nakabonge, Ssekandi, Founoune-Mboup, Apori, Ndiaye, Badji and Ngom.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Abdoulaye Fofana Fall abdoulaye.fofana@stud.umu.ac.ug
This article was submitted to Fungi-Plant Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Fungal Biology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.