ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Genet., 16 December 2020

Sec. Computational Genomics

Volume 11 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.593990

Functional Prediction and Assignment of Methanobrevibacter ruminantium M1 Operome Using a Combined Bioinformatics Approach

  • 1. Molecular Systems Engineering Lab, Department of Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, India

  • 2. Human Genetics Lab, Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Mizoram University (Central University), Aizawl, India

Article metrics

View details

23

Citations

6,3k

Views

1,8k

Downloads

Abstract

Methanobrevibacter ruminantium M1 (MRU) is a rod-shaped rumen methanogen with the ability to use H2 and CO2, and formate as substrates for methane formation in the ruminants. Enteric methane emitted from this organism can also be influential to the loss of dietary energy in ruminants and humans. To date, there is no successful technology to reduce methane due to a lack of knowledge on its molecular machinery and 73% conserved hypothetical proteins (HPs; operome) whose functions are still not ascertained perceptively. To address this issue, we have predicted and assigned a precise function to HPs and categorize them as metabolic enzymes, binding proteins, and transport proteins using a combined bioinformatics approach. The results of our study show that 257 (34%) HPs have well-defined functions and contributed essential roles in its growth physiology and host adaptation. The genome-neighborhood analysis identified 6 operon-like clusters such as hsp, TRAM, dsr, cbs and cas, which are responsible for protein folding, sudden heat-shock, host defense, and protection against the toxicities in the rumen. The functions predicted from MRU operome comprised of 96 metabolic enzymes with 17 metabolic subsystems, 31 transcriptional regulators, 23 transport, and 11 binding proteins. Functional annotation of its operome is thus more imperative to unravel the molecular and cellular machinery at the systems-level. The functional assignment of its operome would advance strategies to develop new anti-methanogenic targets to mitigate methane production. Hence, our approach provides new insight into the understanding of its growth physiology and lifestyle in the ruminants and also to reduce anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions worldwide.

Introduction

Enteric methane emission from ruminants is of great concern not only for its impact on global warming potential but also for ensuring the long-term sustainability of ruminant-based agriculture. Methane emission from rumen methanogens (163.3 million metric tons of CO2 equivalents) represents a loss of about 5–7% of dietary energy in ruminants (Hristov et al., 2013; Chellapandi et al., 2017a, 2018; Chellapandi and Prathiviraj, 2020). Methanobrevibacter genus is a dominant rumen methanogenic archaea (61.6%) in which Methanobrevibacter ruminantium M1 (MRU) accounted for 27.3% (Janssen and Kirs, 2008). MRU is a hydrogenotrophic rumen methanogen that use H2 to reduce CO2 for methane biosynthesis. It also uses formate as a carbon source for its growth and energy metabolism (Kaster et al., 2011). This is the first genome sequence to be completed for rumen methanogen. It is a circular chromosome (2.93 Mbp) consisting of 2,278 coding-genes and 144 metabolic pathways with 722 reactions, 557 enzymes, and 751 metabolites (Leahy et al., 2010). However, the MRU genome consists of 756 coding-genes (73%) annotated as hypothetical proteins (HPs). It suggests that the entire proteome functions of this organism are not yet known and have to be elucidated to date.

The function of only 50–70% of coding-genes has been annotated with reasonable confidence in the most completely sequenced bacterial genomes using automated genome sequence analysis (Loewenstein et al., 2009). The characterization of proteins with unknown biological function is known as operome (Greenbaum et al., 2001; Chellapandi et al., 2017b; Prathiviraj and Chellapandi, 2019). Putative genes with known orthologs and no orthologs are termed as conserved hypothetical proteins and uncharacterized proteins, respectively (Mazandu and Mulder, 2012; Shahbaaz et al., 2013). Several approaches have been developed for assisting the function of operome from prokaryotic genomes using the information derived from sequence and structural motifs (Sivashankari and Shanmughavel, 2006; Chellapandi et al., 2017b; Singh and Singh, 2018; Prathiviraj and Chellapandi, 2020a; Sangavai et al., 2020). No one has been employed a combined bioinformatics prediction approach including sequence, structure, and literature confidences for functional assignment of operome and its contribution to metabolic subsystems and cellular machinery. A precise annotation of the operome of a particular genome leads to the discovery of new functions for the development of veterinary and human therapeutics (Ijaq et al., 2015).

The conserved domain-based functional assignment was done for HPs from Pongo abelii and Sus scrofa. It has provided a hint for genome-wide annotation in poorly understood genomes (Jitendra et al., 2011). The structure-based approach has been applied to predict the function of operome from Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (da Fonsêca et al., 2012). Functional and structural domain analysis (Namboori et al., 2004), integrated genomic context analysis (Yellaboina et al., 2007) and literature mining (Doerks et al., 2012), functional enrichment analysis (Mazandu and Mulder, 2012), and genome-scale fold-recognition (Mao et al., 2013) have been used to annotate the potential function of operome from Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. Sequence-based and structure-based approaches have been used to define and prioritize some HPs from Candida dubliniensis, Vibrio cholerae O139, and Staphylococcus aureus as therapeutic targets for the treatment of their infections in humans (McAdow et al., 2011, 2012; Bharat Siva Varma et al., 2015; Islam et al., 2015). Besides, only one HP (MJ_0577) was functionally annotated in Methanococcus jannaschii using a structural-based approach (Zarembinski et al., 1998).

Many in silico attempts have been focused on the functional prediction of operome from human pathogens and no reports on rumen methanogens. Several genome-scale metabolic networks have been reconstructed for methanogenic archaea with a low fraction of HPs functionally assigned by sequence similarity analysis (Chellapandi et al., 2018; Prathiviraj and Chellapandi, 2020a). Since, functional annotation of operome is a great concern not only for implementing our fragmentary knowledge on the potential drug targets but also for genome refinement and improved microbial genome-scale reconstructions (Poulsen et al., 2010; Mazandu and Mulder, 2012; Prathiviraj and Chellapandi, 2019). Thus, we have employed a combined bioinformatics approach for functional assignment, and categorization of operome from MRU with a biological knowledgebase. The predicted functions of operome allow us to comprehend its growth physiology and metabolic behavior in the rumen environment. Several methanogenic antibiotics, inhibitors, and vaccines have been currently available for enteric methane mitigation, but these are a narrow spectrum and species-specific activity (Pulendran and Ahmed, 2006). The present approach is used to predict new anti-methanogenic targets from its precisely annotated operome that resolves the current demand for veterinary therapeutics.

Materials and Methods

Dataset Preparation

We retrieved protein sequences of 756 HPs in the MRU genome from the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)1 and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (Kanehisa et al., 2018) using a simple text mining approach (Le and Huynh, 2019; Le et al., 2019). We used broad ranges of source types such as keywords, “hypothetical proteins, unknown, uncharacterized, and putative” to retrieve the protein sequences from the NCBI and KEGG (Chellapandi et al., 2017b). The FASTA sequences of all HPs were taken separately to carry out sequence analysis. For functional annotation and assignment of MRU operome, we used six different prediction tasks as detailed below (Figure 1). The overall information about similar or identical functions of HPs predicted from each task was manually evaluated to reasoning out the functional assignment of operome. The prediction tools used for each functional annotation were more robust and confident for our analysis similar to the previous works on archaeal and bacterial operome (Prathiviraj and Chellapandi, 2019; Sangavai et al., 2020). E-value is the number of expected hits of a similar score that could be found just by chance. Like p-value, we used e-value for the scoring of each prediction from the dataset and represented in Supplementary Data.

FIGURE 1

Conserved Motif Analysis

A motif is a short segment of a protein sequence or structure, which may be conserved in a large number of different proteins. It can be used to determine the function or conformation of a protein. The conserved motifs in each protein were searched out against the KEGG-Motif search tool2, InterProScan (Quevillon et al., 2005), and Pfam library (Finn et al., 2016). To improve the lineament of prediction, cut off value was set as 10–5 and DUF (domains with unknown functions) were removed from the dataset. We found motif similarity hits for 756 HPs out of which 257 HPs were chosen for further analysis.

Conserved Domain Analysis

Conserved domains in each protein were identified by the NCBI-CDD v3.16 search tool using the position-dependent weight matrices. Additionally, composition-based statistics adjustment was used to remove low complexity composition for statistical significance using the RPS-BLAST version 2.2.28 (Marchler-Bauer et al., 2015). The query sequence was compared with domain architecture and profiles in the domain databases, after that, the compositionally biased conserved region was identified by the SMART (Letunic et al., 2012). The PROSITE profile was scanned for detection of the protein domains, families, and functional sites and associated patterns in the protein sequence using ScanProsite (de Castro et al., 2006). The probable function of HPs was predicted with the InterPro database based on the domain and important sites in the sequences (Finn et al., 2016).

Structural Analysis

The secondary structural elements (helix, sheets, extended coil, and loops) in each protein were predicted from the sequences using SOPMA (Geourjon and Deléage, 1995). We identified structural and functional characteristics by PSI-BLAST similarity searching against the protein data bank3 (Altschul et al., 1997). The sequence similarity hits were selected for finding the alignment of functional residues of a protein of known function with the sequence of HPs using ClustalW (Thompson et al., 2002). Fold assignment, target-template alignment, model building, and model evaluation were carried out with the Swiss Model (Biasini et al., 2014). QMEAN was a composite scoring function describing the major geometrical aspects of protein structures as described below.

where, the GDT_TS score as the target function. We evaluated the structural quality and accuracy of the resulted homology models based on the potential function as below (Benkert et al., 2008).

Evolutionary Trace Analysis

The evolutionary relationships to deduce the functionality of operome were inferred using the SIFTER (Radivojac et al., 2013). It was used to predict the protein function and Gene ontology term using the following confidence score.

where, Sg(f) confidence score as the default prediction for a query protein g, Sgi(f) is the probability domain has function f (Sahraeian et al., 2015).

Analysis of Physicochemical Properties

The physiochemical properties including molecular weight, theoretical pI, instability index, aliphatic index, and grand average of hydropathicity of HPs were predicted from their sequences using the Expasy’s Protparam server4. The instability index provides an estimate of the stability of a protein. An instability index <40 is predicted to be stable, and a value >40 is predicted to be unstable. The instability index uses the following weight values.

where, L is the length of the sequence, DIWV(x[i]x[i+1]) is the instability weight value for the dipeptide starting in position I (Guruprasad et al., 1990). The aliphatic index of a protein is defined as the relative volume occupied by aliphatic side chain amino acids using the following equation.

Where, X(Ala), X(Val), X(Ile), and X(Leu) are mole percent (100 X mole fraction) (Ikai, 1980). The GRAVY value for a protein is calculated as the sum of the hydropathy values of all of the amino acids divided by the number of residues in the sequence (Kyte and Doolittle, 1982).

Analysis of Protein Subcellular Localization

The subcellular localization of every protein was predicted with PSORTb version 3.0.2 based on the hydrophobicity index of amino acids (Yu et al., 2010). The propensity of a protein for being a membrane protein was predicted by SOSUI 2.0 based on the physicochemical parameters (Mitaku et al., 2002). The transmembrane helix and topology of each protein were detected by the TMHMM 2.0 (Krogh et al., 2001) and HMMTOP (Tusnády and Simon, 2001) using the Hidden Markov Model. The signal peptide and location of the cleavage site in the peptide chain were predicted with the SingnalP 4.0 based on a neural network model (Petersen et al., 2011).

Literature Search

The literature survey is the stepping-stone and an essential skill toward the accomplishment of structural and functional analysis provides of proteins (Hubbard and Dunbar, 2017). A process of uncovering useful knowledge from a collection of data from bioinformatics and literature databases is referred to as a knowledge-based discovery (Chellapandi et al., 2017b). Functional assessment of operome was strengthened by extracting relevant experimental supports from available literature in NCBI-PubMed5. A maximum confidence score was set as 12 levels (6 levels from predictions and 6 levels from the literature mining) in which 50% score systematically enumerated and assigned from overall prediction approaches. The rest of them was assigned by manual annotation based on the strength of the literature validation. For example, if the predicted function is similar or identical in all prediction approaches, a maximum confidence score will be assigned as 6. The literature-based confidence score for each predicted function of HPs assigned as; 6- MRU, 5- Phylogenetic neighbors, 4- Methanogens, 3- Archaea, 2- Bacteria, and 1- Eukaryotes. We have set a confidence score interval as 3–6 for both computational prediction and biological knowledge base and then neglected the predicted function of a protein with a low confidence score (<3).

Functional Categorization

We classified the predicted function of HPs based on conserved domain, protein fold, family, and biological function using the CATH database (Knudsen and Wiuf, 2010). The genome-wide analysis was performed to identify the order of gene clusters covering the predicted function of HPs using a genomic context approach (Yellaboina et al., 2007). Gene-neighborhood or adjutant genes were identified by exploring the MRU genome in the KEGG database. Metabolic information of HPs was collected from the MetaCyc (Metabolic Pathways from all Domains of Life) database (Caspi et al., 2014). The resulted data were used to assign the functions of hypothetical proteins of the understudied genome. The overall structural and functional information was manually analyzed to categorize the molecular involvement of HPs in respective metabolic subsystems and the cellular process of the understudied organism.

Results

Functional Classification and Categorization

All predicted protein functions were classified and categorized according to their protein folds, molecular function, subsystems, and transmembrane topologies as shown in Figure 2. About 20% of operome encompasses a Rossmann fold consisting of a nucleotide cofactor binding domain of some NAD+-dependent dehydrogenases, in particular to ribonucleases (Barbas et al., 2013). Fourteen percent of operome belongs to rubrerythrin that constitutes non-haem iron proteins. This functional fold is responsible for oxidative stress protection in anaerobic bacteria and archaea (Prakash et al., 2018). The arcR repressor mutant fold occupies 4–5% of operome, which performs the functions of small homodimeric proteins involved in transcriptional regulation by sequence-specific DNA binding (Vershon et al., 1986; Homa and Brown, 1997). MRU operome contains phoA fold (3–4%) that fused with the cell surface glycoprotein signal sequence similar to Haloferax volcanii (Kandiba et al., 2013). It indicates the importance of some protein folds for conferring oxidative tolerance and cell wall assembly. We found 91 HPs involving in the metabolic reactions with a confidence score >5. A total of 23 HPs is entailed in the small molecule reactions and 15 HPs required for the biosynthesis of cofactors, prosthetic groups, and electron carriers. About 9 HPs are essential to the protein modification reactions whereas 4 HPs contributed to the formation of precursor metabolites for the energy-driven process of this organism. Approximately 50% of drug targets are transmembrane proteins as they play many roles in transport, cell signaling, and energy transduction processes (Terstappen and Reggiani, 2001). We predicted 91 HPs having transmembrane helixes based on their conservation of membranous helix ratios. The α-helix bundle and the β-barrel are predicted as fold classes in many membrane proteins. Archaeal transmembrane proteins have two or more α-helixes consisting of hydrophobic amino acids.

FIGURE 2

Operon-Like Organization

The genome-wide analysis discovered 32 coding genes for HPs, which are all clustered separately, form 6 operon-like organizations (hsp, TRAM, dsr, cbs, anti-toxin, and cas) in the MRU genome (Figure 3). Molecular chaperones such as hsp70, hsp60, and hsp80 resemble some bacterial genomes than the eukaryotic homologs (Gaywee et al., 2002). The hsp gene cluster is essential for chaperone-assisted protein folding in Achaea (Dokland, 1999; Benaroudj and Goldberg, 2000; Large et al., 2009). The assimilatory sulfite reductase (dsrHFEBA) gene cluster detected from this genome provides the importance for the oxidation of accumulated intracellular sulfide and thiosulfate in the diverse environmental niche. The presence of cbs, anti-toxin, and cas gene clusters confers host defense response (innate immunity) to this organism against foreign genetic elements in the rumen ecosystem (Louwen et al., 2014; Chellapandi and Ranjani, 2015). The anti-toxin system plays a vital role in toxicity neutralization (Unterholzner et al., 2013).

FIGURE 3

Cell Division Systems

In this study, we assigned the function of 9 HPs contributing a major role in the cell cycle process in which 8 HPs have shown new functions to this organism (Table 1). AAA+ ATPase, cell division inhibitor, cell division control protein, DNA replication protein 6-2, and structural maintenance of chromosomes protein-1 is highly conserved within the archaeal domain and performs archaeal-specific cell cycle process, DNA repair, and replication fidelity (Kalliomaa-Sanford et al., 2012; Grogan, 2015). A proteasome is a central player in energy-dependent proteolysis and forms a nano-compartment where proteins are degraded into oligopeptides by processive hydrolysis. The 20S proteasome is a catalytic core responsible for this processing. AAA+ ATPase plays several roles in mediating energy-dependent proteolysis by the proteasome (Forouhar et al., 2011; Maupin-Furlow, 2013). Moreover, it contains a P-loop motif involved in the origin of recognition during DNA replication initiation even if conventional C-terminal winged-helix DNA-binding elements lacked (He et al., 2008).

TABLE 1

Locus tagAssigned functionGene
0080| 0744| 0939| 1172| 1932AAA+ ATPaseatad3A
0647Cell division inhibitorsepF
1346Cell division control proteinminE
1419DNA replication protein 6-2cdc6-2
1654Structural maintenance of chromosomes protein 1smc1

Functional annotation of operome involved in the cell division process of MRU.

Transcriptional Regulatory Systems

A total of 26 HPs predicted as functional candidates in which 20 HPs have shown new functions to the transcriptional regulation process of this organism (Table 2). Transcriptional regulatory proteins identified from MRU operome can express a set of proteins that protect cellular proteins against a sudden heat-shock stress, copper and arsenic toxicities, protein folding, and nitrogen starvation (Thieringer et al., 1998; Giaquinto et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2014; Prathiviraj and Chellapandi, 2020a, b). Bro N-terminal domain protein has an N-terminal domain with ALI motif that influences host DNA replication and/or transcription (Makarova et al., 2009). HrcA repressor contains a motif of winged helix-turn-helix transcription repressor. It controls the transcription of heat-shock repressor proteins and protects cellular proteins from being denatured by heat (Liu et al., 2005; Prathiviraj and Chellapandi, 2020b). Hsp70 and Hsp80 from MRU operome perform renaturation of luciferase similar to that found in M. mazei (Zmijewski et al., 2004). Hsp60s are more similar to the type II chaperonins found in the eukaryotic cytosol involved in macromolecular assembly and protein folding (Large et al., 2009). TRAM protein regulates the RNA chaperone activity that is essential for MRU to grow and survive in a cold environment (Zhang et al., 2017).

TABLE 2

Locus tagAssigned functionGene
0757Bro N-terminal domain proteindxs
0349Nitrogen repressornrpR
1052Heat-inducible transcriptional repressorhrcA
1099Translation initiation factor 3tif3
1366| 2156Arsenical resistance operon repressorarsR
1862Copper-sensing transcriptional repressorcsoR
0488| 0490| 0499| 0658| 0764| 0780| 0790| 0801| 0930| 1131| 1147| 1150| 1364| 1590| 1796Transcription factortf2B
1185Cold shock protein
1108DEAD/DEAH box helicasepolB
0877Preprotein translocasesecY

Functional annotation of operome involved in thetranscriptional regulatory process of MRU.

Biosynthesis of Macromolecules

We predicted the function of 20 HPs exhibiting new metabolic roles in this organism and the rest of 76 HPs has shown known functions (Table 3 and Supplementary Table S1). Saccharopine dehydrogenase (NAD/P, L-lysine-forming) (lysA) and succinylglutamate desuccinylase (astE) genes identified from MRU operome, which are responsible to mediate the biosynthesis of L-lysine and L-glutamate. LysA protein contains a motif of LOR/SDH bifunctional conserved region that converts L-saccharopine into L-lysine via l-α-aminoadipate pathway (Xu et al., 2007). Cheng et al. (2010), revealed a cross-talk between fungi and methanogens which may occur in host animals since the l-α-aminoadipate pathway is very specific to fungi. The second enzyme transforms N2-succinylglutamate into succinate and glutamate. Therefore, both enzymes proposed to be involved in amino acid biosynthesis of MRU as reported earlier on other methanogens (Enzmann et al., 2018).

TABLE 3

Locus tagAssigned functionECGene
Biosynthesis
Amino acids biosynthesis
1696Carbamoyl-phosphate synthase (glutamine-hydrolyzing)6.3.5.5carB
1737Saccharopine dehydrogenase (NAD/P, L-lysine-forming)1.5.1.7| 1.5.1.8lys1
Aminoacyl-tRNA charging metabolic clusters
0488| 0490| 0499| 0764| 0780| 0790| 0801| 1131| 1147| 1150| 1364| 1590| 1796Methionine—tRNA ligase6.1.1.10metG
1493Tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase (Membrane bound)6.1.1.2trpS
Carbohydrates and Cell structures biosynthesis
1418dTDP-4-amino-4,6-dideoxygalactose transaminase2.6.1.59rffA
1886Glycogen Phosphorylase2.4.1.1glgP
1469UDP-glucose 4-epimerase5.1.3.2galE
1462Pantothenate synthase6.3.2.1panC
0480Pyruvate kinase2.7.1.40pykA
Cell structures biosynthesis
1065CDP-glycerol glycerophosphotransferase2.7.8.12tagF
1589| 1957Thiamine monophosphate synthase2.7.7.39tagD
Cofactors, Prosthetic groups, Electron carriers biosynthesis
2219Cobalamin biosynthesis protein CbiB6.3.1.10cbiB
0947Coenzyme F420-0:L-glutamate ligase6.3.2.31cofE
1116CTP: Molybdenum cofactor cytidylyltransferase2.7.7.76
1450Energy-converting hydrogenase B subunit O1.6.5.3ehbO
0776| 0785Gamma-glutamyl cyclotransferase2.3.2.4ykqA
1937Glutathione peroxidase1.11.1.9gpxA
0035NUDIX hydrolase3.6.1.22nadM
05964-Hydroxybenzoate octaprenyltransferase2.5.1.39ubiA
15505-Formyltetrahydrofolate cyclo-ligase activity6.3.3.2mthfs
1831Dihydroneopterin aldolase4.1.2.25folB
1209Nicotinate-nucleotide pyrophosphorylase [carboxylating]2.4.2.19nadC
0277NUDIX hydrolase3.6.1.22nudC
2172Riboflavin kinase2.7.1.161ribK
0432Tocopherol cyclase5.5.1.24vte1
1728Phosphomevalonate decarboxylase4.1.1.99pmd
Fatty acid and lipid biosynthesis
0460Dolichol kinase2.7.1.108dolk
1693Integral Membrane bound Phosphatidate cytidylyltransferase2.7.7.41cdsA
Metabolic regulators biosynthesis
09396-Phosphofructo-2-kinase| Fructose-2,6-bisphosphate 2-phosphatase2.7.1.105| 3.1.3.46pfkfb3
0393 (K18532 adenylate kinase [EC:2.7.4.3])Adenylate kinase2.7.4.3adk
Nucleosides and nucleotides biosynthesis
0425L-Threonylcarbamoyladenylate synthase2.7.7.87yrdC/sua5/ywlC
1890Phosphoribosylaminoimidazole carboxylase4.1.1.21purE
0720Uridylate kinase (DNA binding protein)2.7.4.22pyrH
Catabolism
Alcohols degradation
0528Coenzyme B12-dependent diol dehydrase4.2.1.28pduC
Amino acids degradation
2016| 0381Succinylglutamate desuccinylase3.5.1.96astE
Aromatic compounds degradation
16224-Carboxymuconolactone decarboxylase4.1.1.44pcaC
0476Phenylacetate-CoA oxygenase1.14.13.149paaJ
0313Pyrogallol hydroxytransferase1.97.1.2athL
C1 Compounds utilization and assimilation
2132Bifunctional formaldehyde-activating enzyme4.2.1.147/4.1.2.43fae-hps
1013Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (NAD+-dependent, decarboxylating)1.1.1.343gntZ
Inorganic nutrients metabolism
1280| 1936NADPH-dependent FMN reductase1.5.1.38ssuE
0224| 0376Phosphonoacetate hydrolase (membrane bound)3.11.1.2phnA
Secondary metabolites degradation
1330Carbohydrate kinase (Integral membrane-bound)2.7.1.4pfkB
2120Quercetin dioxygenase1.13.11.24qodI
Macromolecule modification
0421Alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase2.4.99.4siat4a
Small molecule reactions
1938Arsenate Reductase (Thioredoxin)1.20.4.1arsC
0134Type I restriction-modification system M subunit HsdM2.1.1.72hsdM
0674| 1683| 1749Succinate dehydrogenase (quinone)1.3.5.1sdh
1013Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (NAD+-dependent, decarboxylating)1.1.1.343gntZ
21942-Enoyl-CoA Hydratase3.4.21.92clpP
07472-Polyprenylphenol 6- hydroxylase1.14.13.-ubiB2
0202Aconitate hydratase4.2.1.3acnA
2180| 2184| 2185Acyltransferase2.3.1.13glyat
0496ATP pyrophosphatase3.6.1.8thiI
0062| 0063| 1113| 1172ATP-dependent DNA helicase3.6.4.12ashA
2196Choloylglycine hydrolase3.5.1.24
0156| 0041DNA binding E3 SUMO-protein ligase6.3.2.-piaS4
0174 (K09723 DNA replication factor GINS)DNA primase small subunit2.7.7.-priA
2069DNA-3-methyladenine glycosylase3.2.2.20tag
1108| 2173DNA-directed DNA polymerase2.7.7.7polB
1660| 1699| 1734Flavin reductase1.5.1.36hpaC
1442Geranylgeranyl reductase1.3.1.83chlP
1290| 1291Lincosamide nucleotidyltransferase2.7.7.-inuA
0930Manganese-dependent inorganic pyrophosphatase3.6.1.1ppaC
0223Membrane-bound O-acyltransferase2.3.1.-rimL
1242Nucleoside Triphosphate Pyrophosphohydrolase3.6.1.8mazG
1605| 0049Nucleotide diphosphatase3.6.1.9ENPP
2146Oligosaccharyl transferase2.4.99.18STT3
1588Succinylglutamate desuccinylase/aspartoacylase3.5.1.15aspA
0100Peptidoglycan-associated polymer biosynthesis2.-.-.-csaB
1555Pseudouridine-5’-monophosphatase3.1.3.-HDHD1
1964Sterol 3-beta-glucosyltransferase (Phosphorylating)2.4.1.173
1631UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase (non-hydrolyzing)5.1.3.14wecB
0835von Willebrand/Integrin A Domains3.6.4.-hepA
Protein-modification reactions
1344Lysine carboxypeptidase3.4.17.3CPN1
1375Membrane-bound dolichyl-phosphate-mannose-protein mannosyltransferase2.4.1.109pomT
0791Methylated-DNA—[protein]-cysteine S-methyltransferase2.1.1.63
1884Nucleotide-activated 6-deoxyhexose biosynthesis2.4.1.109pomT
2158Putative pyruvate formate-lyase1.97.1.4pflX
1801| 1867Ribosomal-protein-alanine N-acetyltransferase2.3.1.128rimI
1389| 1514S-Adenosyl-L-methionine-dependent methyltransferase1.16.1.8mtrR
1096Serine/threonine protein kinase with TPR repeats2.7.11.1bub1
1563Proteasome endopeptidase complex3.4.25.1psmA
1311| 0426tRNA-splicing ligase6.5.1.3rtcB
Energy metabolism
Generation of precursor metabolites and energy
2214Fuculose 1-phosphate aldolase4.1.2.17fucA
1894Fumarate hydratase4.2.1.2fumA

Functional annotation of operome involved in differentmetabolic subsystems of MRU.

The 2-enoyl-CoA hydratase catalyzes the second step in the physiologically important β-oxidation pathway of fatty acid metabolism in MRU (Agnihotri and Liu, 2003). Glycogen phosphorylase catalyzes the phosphorolysis of α-1, 4 glycosidic bonds in glycogen to yield glucose-1-phosphate for glycolysis (Rath et al., 2000). Interestingly, MRU operome has the ability to synthesis enterobacterial-like common antigen as it contains dTDP-4-amino-4, 6-dideoxygalactose transaminase (rffA). This enzyme catalyzes the conversion of TDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-D-glucose to TDP-D-fucosamine similar to the enterobacteria family (Meier-Dieter et al., 1990; Hwang et al., 2004). The presence of phosphatidate cytidylyltransferase (cdsA) provides evidence of the biosynthesis of archaeal-specific phospholipids. It catalyzes sn-glycerol 3-phosphate into an L-1-phosphatidylglycerol-phosphate precursor-like Escherichia coli (Carter et al., 1968). We found an AMMECR1 motif in phosphomevalonate decarboxylase from MRU operome, which converts (R)-mevalonate 5-phosphate to isopentenyl diphosphate in the mevalonate pathway, as reported in Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (Grochowski et al., 2006). Results of our study revealed that the MRU genome has shown a metabolic potential for the biosynthesis of enterobacterial-like common antigen, archaeal-specific phospholipids, and isopentenyl diphosphate, a precursor required for cell wall biogenesis.

Cofactors, Prosthetic Groups, Electron Carrier Biosynthesis

We predicted the function of some HPs involving in the biosynthesis of coenzyme F420, flavin, and electron carriers in MRU. F420-0: L-glutamate ligase is a key enzyme identified from MRU operome, which converts multiple γ-linked L-glutamates to the polyglutamated F420derivative in the biosynthesis of coenzyme F420 (Li et al., 2003). As reported in bacteria and plants, MRU operome has diamino hydroxy phosphoribosyl aminopyrimidine reductase (ribD) that converts 2, 5-diamino-6-(5-phospho-D-ribosylamino)pyrimidine-4(3H)-one into 5-amino-6-(5-phospho-D-ribosylamino)uracil in flavin biosynthesis pathway (Garfoot et al., 2014). Cytidylyltransferase belongs to the NTP transferase superfamily encoded by mocA gene (mru_1116) of the MRU genome. It catalyzes the cytidylation of the molybdenum cofactor demanded many functional enzymes (Fay et al., 2015). Energy-converting hydrogenase B subunit O consists of a conserved motif of IHPPAH, which generates low potential electrons required for autotrophic CO2 assimilation as reported in Methanococcus maripaludis (Major et al., 2010).

Aromatic Compounds Degradation Systems

Pyrogallol hydroxytransferase (athL) detected from MRU operome has a carboxypeptidase regulatory-like domain. It is involved only in the regulation of peptidase catalyzing the conversion of pyrogallol into phloroglucinol. Phloroglucinolcan stimulates the gut microbiota and decreases the partial pressure of H2 in the rumen. It suggests the capture of excess H2 generated from methanogenesis inhibition can be promoted by phloroglucinol utilization in the rumen (Martinez-Fernandez et al., 2017). Interestingly, we assigned a precise function to HP Mru_0476 as phenylacetate-CoA oxygenase in phenylacetate catabolic pathway. This enzyme converts phenylacetyl-CoA to a 2-(1, 2-epoxy-1, 2-dihydrophenyl) acetyl-CoA. Archaea harboring key genes of this pathway are some members of the Halobacteria, which may have acquired a multitude of bacterial genes (Kennedy et al., 2001; Notomista et al., 2003). As shown by our analysis, MRU can degrade pyrogallol and phenylacetate produced by gut microbial in ruminants (Martinez-Fernandez et al., 2017).

Detoxification Systems

MRU operome plays a key role in formaldehyde, inorganic arsenate, and copper detoxification process. It contains 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (gntZ) gene as homologous to methanotrophic bacteria such as Methylophilus methylotrophus and Methylobacillus flagellates (Chistoserdova et al., 2000). The presence of arsenate reductase (arsC) and Cu+-exporting ATPase (copA) provides a defense system to its cells against inorganic arsenate and copper toxicities (Liu et al., 2007).

Macromolecule Modification Systems

MRU operome contains α-2, 3-sialyltransferase gene coding protein having a Rossmann fold with the architecture of the α-β complex. This enzyme catalyzes the transfer of sialic acid from CMP-N-acetyl-β-neuraminate to membrane proteins and lipids of the cell wall of MRU (Koga et al., 1993). Dolichyl-phosphate-mannose-protein mannosyltransferase is identified as carbohydrate carriers to transfer mannosyl residues to the hydroxy group of serine or threonine residues during the post-translational protein modification process of MRU (Podar et al., 2013).

Membrane Transport Systems

We observed 16 HPs contributing to the transport systems of this organism (Supplementary Table S2). MRU operome encompasses genes coding for transporter proteins responsible for maintenance of metal homeostasis in particular to magnesium and manganese ions and uptake/export of vitamin, sulfite, and tricarboxylate (Winnen et al., 2003; Weinitschke et al., 2007; Hattori et al., 2007, 2009; Rodionov et al., 2009; Rosch et al., 2009; Mayer et al., 2012; Karpowich et al., 2015). The presence of PurR-regulated permease regulon and Na+/H+ antiporter protein carries out the exchange Na+ for H+ across the cytoplasmic membrane of archaea (Rimon et al., 2012). Cell-cell communication and intra-species electron transfer can be mediated by preprotein translocase predicted from its operome, as described for hydrogenotrophic methanogens and E. coli (Cooper et al., 2017). Translocation sheath protein has an N-terminal domain that mediates the translocation of SPI-2 TTSS effector proteins in MRU (Nikolaus et al., 2001).

D-Gluconate Catabolic System

As shown by our analysis, we proposed a putative D-gluconate catabolic pathway exclusively present in MRU for the biosynthesis of archaeal membrane phospholipids (Figure 4). The presence of six HPs with predicted functions evidences the existence of this pathway in this organism. Klemm et al. (1996), identified a gntP gene to be involved in gluconate uptake by E. coli. Haloferax volcanii contains a DeoR/GlpR-type transcription factor, which has shown its potential role as a global regulator of sugar metabolism and to cotranscribe with the downstream phosphofructokinase (pfkB) gene (Rawls et al., 2010). As similar to Pseudomonas aeruginosa, MRU operome has D-gluconate kinase gene despite a membrane-bound D-gluconate dehydrogenase gene to synthesize phospholipids (Matsushita et al., 1979; Schlictman et al., 1995; Kulakova et al., 2001). As similar to archaea, the utilization of gluconate in MRU leads to a branch point for two central metabolic pathways: the Entner-Doudoroff pathway and phospholipids biosynthesis (Bräsen et al., 2014).

FIGURE 4

Discussion

The function of operome is obscure and quite unsettling in prokaryotic genomes. Understanding important knowledge gaps in the unknown function of operome can unravel their cellular and molecular mechanisms. The functionality of proteins with unknown function have been identified, characterized, and validated with a broad spectrum of genetic and biochemical experiments (Mills et al., 2015). Several computational methods have been used to describe the physiological states of methanogens from the predicted functions of operome (Chellapandi and Prisilla, 2018; Prathiviraj and Chellapandi, 2019). There are several functional measures (structural and functional motifs) to be considered for computational predictions of operome from available microbial genomes. The present study employed to collect comprehensive information derived from sequence similarity, conserved domain, motif, structure, fold, protein-protein interaction, subcellular localization, phylogenetic inference, and gene expression profile as the predictive measures to assign a precise molecular function to MRU operome. Collective information of them provides a hint to predict some distinct motifs and annotate the function of each protein accurately for studying growth physiology in the rumen ecosystem.

Generally, the protein sequence is less conserved than the tertiary structure of a protein (Illergård et al., 2009). In this study, experimentally solved structures and accurate protein folding offered the major importance to deduce some level of a functional description of a protein, as described by Nealon et al. (2017). Characterization of binding motifs and catalytic cores present in the proteins and functional categorization in the cell has been achieved by using the predictive measures derived from overall proteome information (Shapiro and Harris, 2000). Many protein domains have unknown functions, but they may contribute to the metabolic regulation of organisms (Kotze et al., 2013). It implied the possibility of finding a new domain and motif as well as discovers additional protein pathways and cascades from functionally annotated operome (Ijaq et al., 2015). Functional prediction and assignment of prokaryotic operome have been either only sequence-based or structure-based strategies. In our study, a combination of bioinformatics tools with 6 different prediction schemas and additional literature evidence with a 6-level confidence score was applied to improve the prediction accuracy of our functional assignment (Figure 1). Compared to earlier functional prediction approaches, our approach provides a strong emphasis to reveal its metabolic subsystems and cellular mechanisms from the assigned function of operome.

The mechanisms of molecular pathogenesis and virulence of many pathogenic organisms and drug targets discovery are being considered an accurate prediction of operome function as an important biological knowledgebase (Amavisit et al., 2003; Lamarche et al., 2008; Kumar et al., 2014). Several bioinformatics tools have been utilized for functional prediction of operome from different pathogenic organisms (Kumar et al., 2014, 2015; Singh et al., 2017; Shrivastava et al., 2017). It clearly described that all of them are pathogenic organisms but no reports on rumen methanogens yet. It was the first computational study to characterize the function of MRU operome, a potential methanogen for enteric methane emission in the ruminants via enteric fermentation.

The Rossmann was a novel and ancient fold found in 5, 10-methenyltetrahydromethanopterin hydrogenase, a key enzyme of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. It explains the possibility of hydrogenotrophic lifestyle in MRU, as described by Leahy et al. (2010). The reduction potentials of rubredoxin fold-containing proteins are known to be involved in biochemical processes including carbon fixation, detoxification, and fatty acid metabolism (Prakash et al., 2018; Prathiviraj and Chellapandi, 2020). Cofactors or other prosthetic groups are more attractive to stimulate enzyme activity in hydrolytic reactions of archaea. Transmembrane helixes are generally independently stable in a membrane or membrane-like environment, which are important for signal recognition, transport phenomena, energy translocation, and conservation in the living cell (von Heijne, 1988; Jennings, 1989). Concerning the functional importance, we classified and categorized the function of MRU operome in this study.

In this study, six operon-like clusters were identified from MRU operome. The functions of predicted gene clusters were contributed in chaperone-assisted protein folding, host defense response, and toxicity neutralization of MRU. Some transcriptional regulatory systems predicted from its operome have shown to protect cellular proteins against sudden heat-shock stress, nitrogen limitation, and heavy metal homeostasis. MRU genome contains many pathway holes, which hinder its accurate metabolic reconstruction at the genome-scale. In our study, we detected some key genes missing in the metabolic network of this organism. Consequently, complete metabolic subsystems were annotated for the biosynthesis of L-lysine, L-glutamate, enterobacterial-like common antigen, archaeal-specific phospholipids, and isopentenyl diphosphate. MRU operome can produce coenzyme F420 and flavin and electron carriers. Cell wall lipids and membrane proteins have been synthesized from the function of some HPs through macromolecule modification reactions. This organism has well-established transporter systems to maintain metal homeostasis and uptake/export of vitamin, gluconate, sulfite, and tricarboxylate. D-Gluconate catabolic pathway was uniquely discovered from MRU operome for the biosynthesis of archaeal membrane phospholipids.

Conclusion

The functional assignment of operome is a mandatory process for a better understanding of the metabolic and molecular processes of this organism. The predicted functional properties of its operome afford us not only for new structural information but also for new molecular functions essential for the lifestyle in the rumen ecosystem. A major operome covers all functional counterparts needed to perform diverse metabolic pathways and regulatory processes. Some imperative physiological functions (oxidative stress, archaeal-specific membrane phospholipids, etc.) of this organism are revealed from this study. The genome-neighborhood analysis found six main gene clusters (hsp, tram, dsr, cbs, anti-toxin, and gas), which are contributed to the energetic metabolism and defense systems. MRU operome contains 119 metabolic enzymes with 18 sub-pathways and 25 binding proteins that recognize the DNA, RNA, metal, and membrane for cellular function. Interestingly, we discovered a putative D-gluconate catabolic pathway for the biosynthesis of archaeal-specific membrane phospholipids. Several virulence-associated and vaccine targeted proteins have been identified from MRU operome. It suggests the development of new methane mitigation interventions that target the key metabolic proteins to reduce methane emissions in ruminants. Functional prediction and assignment of its operome are thus very important to comprehend the cellular machinery at the systems-level for anti-methanogenic compounds discovery. Nevertheless, all of our predicted functions of its operome should be evaluated and validated experimentally with protein expression and purification, crystallization, and structure determination studies.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author contributions

PC: research design, concept, and manuscript writing. MB: data preparation and analysis. NS: data analysis and manuscript revision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the University Grants Commission (RA-2012-14-SC-TAM-1768) and Department of Biotechnology (BT/49/NE/2014), New Delhi, India for financial assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2020.593990/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Table 1

Functional annotation of operome involved in diverse metabolic systems of MRU.

Supplementary Table 2

Functional annotation of operome involved in transporter mechanisms of MRU.

Supplementary Data

All predicted information for functional assignment of MRU operome.

References

  • 1

    AgnihotriG.LiuH. W. (2003). Enoyl-CoA hydratase. reaction, mechanism, and inhibition.Bioorg. Med. Chem.11920.

  • 2

    AltschulS. F.MaddenT. L.SchäfferA. A.ZhangJ.ZhangZ.MillerW.et al (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.Nucleic Acids Res.2533893402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389

  • 3

    AmavisitP.LightfootD.BrowningG. F.MarkhamP. F. (2003). Variation between pathogenic serovars within salmonella pathogenicity islands.J. Bacteriol.18536243635. 10.1128/jb.185.12.3624-3635.2003

  • 4

    BarbasA.PopescuA.FrazãoC.ArraianoC. M.FialhoA. M. (2013). Rossmann-fold motifs can confer multiple functions to metabolic enzymes: RNA binding and ribonuclease activity of a UDP-glucose dehydrogenase.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.430218224. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.10.091

  • 5

    BenaroudjN.GoldbergA. L. (2000). PAN, the proteasome-activating nucleotidase from archaebacteria, is a protein-unfolding molecular chaperone.Nat. Cell Biol.2833839. 10.1038/35041081

  • 6

    BenkertP.TosattoS. C.SchomburgD. (2008). QMEAN: a comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment.Proteins71261277. 10.1002/prot.21715

  • 7

    Bharat Siva VarmaP.AdimulamY. B.KodukulaS. (2015). Insilico functional annotation of a hypothetical protein from Staphylococcus aureus.J. Infect. Publ. Health8526532. 10.1016/j.jiph.2015.03.007

  • 8

    BiasiniM.BienertS.WaterhouseA.ArnoldK.StuderG.SchmidtT.et al (2014). SWISS-MODEL: modeling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information.Nucleic Acids Res.42W252W258.

  • 9

    BräsenC.EsserD.RauchB.SiebersB. (2014). Carbohydrate metabolism in Archaea: current insights into unusual enzymes and pathways and their regulation.Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.7889175. 10.1128/mmbr.00041-13

  • 10

    CarterJ. R.FoxC. F.KennedyE. P. (1968). Interaction of sugars with the membrane protein component of the lactose transport system of Escherichia coli.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.60725732. 10.1073/pnas.60.2.725

  • 11

    CaspiR.AltmanT.BillingtonR.et al (2014). The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of Pathway/Genome Databases.Nucleic Acids Res.42D459D471.

  • 12

    ChangF. M.CoyneH. J.CubillasC.VinuesaP.FangX.MaZ.et al (2014). Cu(I)-mediated allosteric switching in a copper-sensing operon repressor (CsoR).J. Biol. Chem.2891920419217. 10.1074/jbc.m114.556704

  • 13

    ChellapandiP.BharathiM.SangavaiC.PrathivirajR. (2018). Methanobacterium formicicum as a target rumen methanogen for the development of new methane mitigation interventions-A review.Veter.Anim. Sci.68694. 10.1016/j.vas.2018.09.001

  • 14

    ChellapandiP.BharathiM.PrathivirajR.SasikalaR.VikramanM. (2017a). Genome-scale metabolic model as a virtual platform to reveal the ecological importance of methanogenic archaea.Curr. Biotechnol.6149160. 10.2174/2211550105666160901125353

  • 15

    ChellapandiP.Mohamed Khaja, HussainM.PrathivirajR. (2017b). CPSIR-CM: a database for structural properties of proteins identified in cyanobacterial C1 metabolism.Algal. Res.22135139. 10.1016/j.algal.2016.12.005

  • 16

    ChellapandiP.PrathivirajR. (2020). A systems biology perspective of Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus strain ΔH for bioconversion of CO2 to methane.J.CO2 Utiliz.40:101210. 10.1016/j.jcou.2020.101210

  • 17

    ChellapandiP.PrisillaA. (2018). Clostridium botulinum type A-virulome-gut interactions: a systems biology insight.Hum. Microb. J.81522. 10.1016/j.humic.2018.01.003

  • 18

    ChellapandiP.RanjaniJ. (2015). Knowledge-based discovery for designing CRISPR-CAS systems against invading mobilomes in thermophiles.Syst. Synth. Biol.997106. 10.1007/s11693-015-9176-8

  • 19

    ChengA. G.McAdowM.KimH. K.BaeT.MissiakasD. M.SchneewindO. (2010). Contribution of coagulases towards Staphylococcus aureus disease and protective immunity.PLoS Pathog.6:e1001036. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001036

  • 20

    ChistoserdovaL.GomelskyL.VorholtJ. A.GomelskyM.TsygankovY. D.LidstromM. E. (2000). Analysis of two formaldehyde oxidation pathways in Methylobacillus flagellatus KT, a ribulose monophosphate cycle methylotroph.Microbiology146233238. 10.1099/00221287-146-1-233

  • 21

    CooperR. M.TsimringL.HastyJ. (2017). Inter-species population dynamics enhance microbial horizontal gene transfer and spread of antibiotic resistance.eLife6:e25950.

  • 22

    da FonsêcaM. M.ZahaA.CaffarenaE. R.VasconcelosA. T. (2012). Structure-based functional inference of hypothetical proteins from Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae.J. Mol. Model1819171925. 10.1007/s00894-011-1212-3

  • 23

    de CastroE.SigristC. J.GattikerA.BulliardV.Langendijk-GenevauxP. S.GasteigerE.et al (2006). ScanProsite: detection of PROSITE signature matches and ProRule-associated functional and structural residues in proteins.Nucleic Acids Res.34W362W365.

  • 24

    DoerksT.van NoortV.MinguezP.BorkP. (2012). Annotation of the M. tuberculosis hypothetical orfeome: adding functional information to more than half of the uncharacterized proteins.PLoS One7:e34302. 10.1371/journal.pone.0034302

  • 25

    DoklandT. (1999). Scaffolding proteins and their role in viral assembly.Cell Mol. Life Sci.56580603. 10.1007/s000180050455

  • 26

    EnzmannF.MayerF.RotherM.HoltmannD. (2018). Methanogens: biochemical background and biotechnological applications.AMB Exp.8:1.

  • 27

    FayA. W.WiigJ. A.LeeC. C.HuY. (2015). Identification and characterization of functional homologs of nitrogenase cofactor biosynthesis protein NifB from methanogens.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1121482914833. 10.1073/pnas.1510409112

  • 28

    FinnR. D.AttwoodT. K.BabbittP. C.et al (2016). InterPro in 2017-beyond protein family and domain annotations.Nucleic Acids Res.45D190D199.

  • 29

    ForouharF.SaadatN.HussainM.SeetharamanJ.LeeI.JanjuaH.et al (2011). A large conformational change in the putative ATP pyrophosphatase PF0828 induced by ATP binding.Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F. Struct. Biol. Cryst. Commun.6713231327. 10.1107/s1744309111031447

  • 30

    GarfootA. L.ZemskaO.RappleyeC. A. (2014). Histoplasma capsulatum depends on de novo vitamin biosynthesis for intraphagosomal proliferation.Infect. Immun.82393404. 10.1128/iai.00824-13

  • 31

    GayweeJ.XuW.RadulovicS.BessmanM. J.AzadA. F. (2002). The Rickettsia prowazekii invasion gene homolog (invA) encodes a Nudix hydrolase active on adenosine (5’)-pentaphospho-(5’)-adenosine.Mol. Cell Proteom.1179185. 10.1074/mcp.m100030-mcp200

  • 32

    GeourjonC.DeléageG. (1995). SOPMA: significant improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by consensus prediction from multiple alignments.Comput. Appl. Biosci.11681684. 10.1093/bioinformatics/11.6.681

  • 33

    GiaquintoL.CurmiP. M.SiddiquiK. S.PoljakA.DeLongE.DasSarmaS.et al (2007). Structure and function of cold shock proteins in archaea.J. Bacteriol.18957385748. 10.1128/jb.00395-07

  • 34

    GreenbaumD.LuscombeN. M.JansenR.QianJ.GersteinM. (2001). Interrelating different types of genomic data, from proteome to secretome: ’oming in on function.Genome Res.1114631468. 10.1101/gr.207401

  • 35

    GrochowskiL. L.XuH.WhiteR. H. (2006). Methanocaldococcus jannaschii uses a modified mevalonate pathway for biosynthesis of isopentenyl diphosphate.J. Bacteriol.18831923198. 10.1128/jb.188.9.3192-3198.2006

  • 36

    GroganD. W. (2015). Understanding DNA repair in hyperthermophilic archaea: persistent gaps and other reasons to focus on the fork.Archaea2015;942605.

  • 37

    GuruprasadK.ReddyB. V.PanditM. W. (1990). Correlation between stability of a protein and its dipeptide composition: a novel approach for predicting in vivo stability of a protein from its primary sequence.Prot. Eng.4155161. 10.1093/protein/4.2.155

  • 38

    HattoriM.IwaseN.FuruyaN.TanakaY.TsukazakiT.IshitaniR.et al (2009). Mg(2+)-dependent gating of bacterial MgtE channel underlies Mg(2+) homeostasis.EMBO J.2836023612. 10.1038/emboj.2009.288

  • 39

    HattoriM.TanakaY.FukaiS.IshitaniR.NurekiO. (2007). Crystal structure of the MgtE Mg2+ transporter.Nature44810721075. 10.1038/nature06093

  • 40

    HeZ. G.FengY.WangJ.JiangP. X. (2008). The regulatory function of N-terminal AAA+ ATPase domain of eukaryote-like archaeal Orc1/Cdc6 protein during DNA replication initiation.Arch. Biochem. Biophys.471176183. 10.1016/j.abb.2008.01.007

  • 41

    HomaF. L.BrownJ. C. (1997). Capsid assembly and DNA packaging in herpes simplex virus.Rev. Med. Virol.7107122. 10.1002/(sici)1099-1654(199707)7:2<107::aid-rmv191>3.0.co;2-m

  • 42

    HristovA. N.OhJ.FirkinsJ. L.DijkstraJ.KebreabE.WaghornG.et al (2013). Special topics–Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options.J. Anim. Sci.9150455069. 10.2527/jas.2013-6583

  • 43

    HubbardK. E.DunbarS. D. (2017). Perceptions of scientific research literature and strategies for reading papers depend on academic career stage.PLoS One12:e0189753. 10.1371/journal.pone.0189753

  • 44

    HwangB. Y.LeeH. J.YangY. H.JooH. S.KimB. G. (2004). Characterization and investigation of substrate specificity of the sugar aminotransferase WecE from E. coli K12.Chem. Biol.11915925. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.04.015

  • 45

    IjaqJ.ChandrasekharanM.PoddarR.BethiN.SundararajanV. S. (2015). Annotation and curation of uncharacterized proteins- challenges.Front. Genet6:119. 10.3389/fgene.2015.00119

  • 46

    IkaiA. (1980). Thermostability and aliphatic index of globular proteins.J. Biochem.8818951898.

  • 47

    IllergårdK.ArdellD. H.ElofssonA. (2009). Structure is three to ten times more conserved than sequence-a study of structural response in protein cores.Proteins77499508. 10.1002/prot.22458

  • 48

    IslamM. S.ShahikS. M.SohelM.PatwaryN. I.HasanM. A. (2015). In silico structural and functional annotation of hypothetical proteins of Vibrio cholerae O139.Genom. Inform.135359.

  • 49

    JanssenP. H.KirsM. (2008). Structure of the archaeal community of the rumen.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.7436193625. 10.1128/aem.02812-07

  • 50

    JenningsM. L. (1989). Topography of membrane proteins.Annu. Rev. Biochem.589991027. 10.1146/annurev.bi.58.070189.005031

  • 51

    JitendraS.NarulaR.AgnihotriS.SinghM. (2011). Annotation of hypothetical proteins orthologous in Pongo abelii and Sus scrofa.Bioinformation6297299. 10.6026/97320630006297

  • 52

    Kalliomaa-SanfordA. K.Rodriguez-CastañedaF. A.McLeodB. N.Latorre-RosellóV.SmithJ. H.ReimannJ.et al (2012). Chromosome segregation in Archaea mediated by a hybrid DNA partition machine.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10937543759. 10.1073/pnas.1113384109

  • 53

    KandibaL.GuanZ.EichlerJ. (2013). Lipid modification gives rise to two distinct Haloferax volcanii S-layer glycoprotein populations.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1828938943. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.11.023

  • 54

    KanehisaM.SatoY.FurumichiM.MorishimaK.TanabeM. (2018). New approach for understanding genome variations in KEGG.Nucleic Acids Res.47D590D595. 10.1093/nar/gky962

  • 55

    KarpowichN. K.SongJ. M.CoccoN.WangD. N. (2015). ATP binding drives substrate capture in an ECF transporter by a release-and-catch mechanism.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.22565571. 10.1038/nsmb.3040

  • 56

    KasterA. K.MollJ.PareyK.ThauerR. K. (2011). Coupling of ferredoxin and heterodisulfide reduction via electron bifurcation in hydrogenotrophic methanogenic archaea.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.10829812986. 10.1073/pnas.1016761108

  • 57

    KennedyS. P.NgW. V.SalzbergS. L.HoodL.DasSarmaS. (2001). Understanding the adaptation of Halobacterium species NRC-1 to its extreme environment through computational analysis of its genome sequence.Genome Res.1116411650. 10.1101/gr.190201

  • 58

    KlemmP.TongS.NielsenH.ConwayT. (1996). ThegntP gene of Escherichia coli involved in gluconate uptake.J. Bacteriol.1786167. 10.1128/jb.178.1.61-67.1996

  • 59

    KnudsenM.WiufC. (2010). The CATH database.Hum. Genom.4207212. 10.1186/1479-7364-4-3-207

  • 60

    KogaY.NishiharaM.MoriiH.Akagawa-MatsushitaM. (1993). Ether polar lipids of methanogenic bacteria: structures, comparative aspects, and biosyntheses.Microbiol. Rev.57164182. 10.1128/mmbr.57.1.164-182.1993

  • 61

    KotzeH. L.ArmitageE. G.SharkeyK. J.AllwoodJ. W.DunnW. B.WilliamsK. J.et al (2013). A novel untargeted metabolomics correlation-based network analysis incorporating human metabolic reconstructions.BMC Syst. Biol.7:107. 10.1186/1752-0509-7-107

  • 62

    KroghA.LarssonB.von HeijneG.SonnhammerE. L. (2001). Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.J. Mol. Biol.305567580. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315

  • 63

    KulakovaA. N.KulakovL. A.AkulenkoN. V.KsenzenkoV. N.HamiltonJ. T.QuinnJ. P. (2001). Structural and functional analysis of the phosphonoacetate hydrolase (phnA) gene region in Pseudomonas fluorescens 23F.J. Bacteriol.18332683275. 10.1128/jb.183.11.3268-3275.2001

  • 64

    KumarK.PrakashA.AnjumF.IslamA.AhmadF.HassanM. I. (2015). Structure-based functional annotation of hypothetical proteins from Candida dubliniensis: a quest for potential drug targets.3 Biotech.5561576. 10.1007/s13205-014-0256-3

  • 65

    KumarK.PrakashA.TasleemM.IslamA.AhmadF.HassanM. I. (2014). Functional annotation of putative hypothetical proteins from Candida dubliniensis.Gene54393100. 10.1016/j.gene.2014.03.060

  • 66

    KyteJ.DoolittleR. F. (1982). A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein.J. Mol. Biol.157105132. 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0

  • 67

    LamarcheM. G.WannerB. L.CrépinS.HarelJ. (2008). The phosphate regulon and bacterial virulence: a regulatory network connecting phosphate homeostasis and pathogenesis.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.32461473. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00101.x

  • 68

    LargeA. T.GoldbergM. D.LundP. A. (2009). Chaperones and protein folding in the archaea.Biochem. Soc. Trans.374651. 10.1042/bst0370046

  • 69

    LeN. Q. K.HuynhT. T. (2019). Identifying SNAREs by Incorporating Deep Learning Architecture and Amino Acid Embedding Representation.Front. Physiol.10:1501. 10.3389/fphys.2019.01501

  • 70

    LeN. Q. K.HuynhT. T.YappE. K. Y.YehH. Y. (2019). Identification of clathrin proteins by incorporating hyperparameter optimization in deep learning and PSSM profiles.Comput. Methods Progr. Biomed.1778188. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.05.016

  • 71

    LeahyS. C.KellyW. J.AltermannE.RonimusR. S.YeomanC. J.PachecoD. M.et al (2010). The genome sequence of the rumen methanogen Methanobrevibacter ruminantium reveals new possibilities for controlling ruminant methane emissions.PLoS One5:e8926. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008926

  • 72

    LetunicI.DoerksT.BorkP. (2012). SMART 7: recent updates to the protein domain annotation resource.Nucleic Acids Res.40D302D305.

  • 73

    LiH.XuH.GrahamD. E.WhiteR. H. (2003). Glutathione synthetase homologs encode alpha-L-glutamate ligases for methanogenic coenzyme F420 and tetrahydrosarcinapterin biosyntheses.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10097859790. 10.1073/pnas.1733391100

  • 74

    LiuJ.HuangC.ShinD. H.YokotaH.JancarikJ.KimJ. S.et al (2005). Crystal structure of a heat-inducible transcriptional repressor HrcA from Thermotoga maritima: structural insight into DNA binding and dimerization.J. Mol. Biol.350987996. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.04.021

  • 75

    LiuT.RameshA.MaZ.WardS. K.ZhangL.GeorgeG. N.et al (2007). CsoR is a novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis copper-sensing transcriptional regulator.Nat. Chem. Biol.36068. 10.1038/nchembio844

  • 76

    LoewensteinY.RaimondoD.RedfernO. C.WatsonJ.FrishmanD.LinialM.et al (2009). Protein function annotation by homology-based inference.Genome Biol.10:207. 10.1186/gb-2009-10-2-207

  • 77

    LouwenR.StaalsR. H. J.EndtzH. P.van BaarlenP.van der OostJ. (2014). Therole of CRISPR-cas systems in virulence of pathogenic bacteria.Microbiol. Mol. Biol.787488. 10.1128/mmbr.00039-13

  • 78

    MajorT. A.LiuY.WhitmanW. B. (2010). Characterization of energy-conserving hydrogenase B in Methanococcus maripaludis.J. Bacteriol.19240224030. 10.1128/jb.01446-09

  • 79

    MakarovaK. S.WolfY. I.van der OostJ.KooninE. V. (2009). Prokaryotic homologs of Argonaute proteins are predicted to function as key components of a novel system of defense against mobile genetic elements.Biol. Direct.4:29. 10.1186/1745-6150-4-29

  • 80

    MaoC.ShuklaM.Larrouy-MaumusG.DixF. L.KelleyL. A.SternbergM. J.et al (2013). Functional assignment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteome revealed by genome-scale fold-recognition.Tuberculosis934046. 10.1016/j.tube.2012.11.008

  • 81

    Marchler-BauerA.DerbyshireM. K.GonzalesN. R.LuS.ChitsazF.GeerL. Y.et al (2015). CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database.Nucleic Acids Res.43D222D226.

  • 82

    Martinez-FernandezG.DenmanS. E.CheungJ.McSweeneyC. S. (2017). Phloroglucinol degradation in the rumen promotes the capture of excess hydrogen generated from methanogenesis inhibition.Front. Microbiol.8:1871. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01871

  • 83

    MatsushitaK.ShinagawaE.AdachiO.AmeyamaM. (1979). Membrane-bound D-gluconate dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Purification and structure of cytochrome-binding form.J. Biochem.8511731181.

  • 84

    Maupin-FurlowJ. A. (2013). Ubiquitin-like. proteins and their roles in archaea.Trends Microbiol.21313810.1016/j.tim.2012.09.006

  • 85

    MayerJ.DengerK.HollemeyerK.SchleheckD.CookA. M. (2012). (R)-Cysteate-nitrogen assimilation by Cupriavidus necator H16 with excretion of 3-sulfolactate: a patchwork pathway.Arch. Microbiol.194949957. 10.1007/s00203-012-0825-y

  • 86

    MazanduG. K.MulderN. J. (2012). Function prediction and analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis hypothetical proteins.Int. J. Mol. Sci.1372837302. 10.3390/ijms13067283

  • 87

    McAdowM.DeDentA. C.EmoloC.ChengA. G.KreiswirthB. N.MissiakasD. M.et al (2012). Coagulases as determinants of protective immune responses against Staphylococcus aureus.Infect. Immun.8033893398. 10.1128/iai.00562-12

  • 88

    McAdowM.KimH. K.DedentA. C.HendrickxA. P.SchneewindO.MissiakasD. M. (2011). Preventing Staphylococcus aureus sepsis through the inhibition of its agglutination in blood.PLoS Pathog.7:e1002307. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002307

  • 89

    Meier-DieterU.StarmanR.BarrK.MayerH.RickP. D. (1990). Biosynthesis of enterobacterial common antigen in Escherichia coli. Biochemical characterization of Tn10 insertion mutants defective in enterobacterial common antigen synthesis.J. Biol. Chem.2651349013497.

  • 90

    MillsC. L.BeuningP. J.OndrechenM. J. (2015). Biochemical functional predictions for protein structures of unknown or uncertain function.Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J.13182191. 10.1016/j.csbj.2015.02.003

  • 91

    MitakuS.HirokawaT.TsujiT. (2002). Amphiphilicity index of polar amino acids as an aid in the characterization of amino acid preference at membrane-water interfaces.Bioinformatics18608616. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.4.608

  • 92

    NambooriS.MhatreN.SujathaS.SrinivasanN.PanditS. B. (2004). Enhanced functional and structural domain assignments using remote similarity detection procedures for proteins encoded in the genome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv.J. Biosci.29245259. 10.1007/bf02702607

  • 93

    NealonJ. O.PhilominaL. S.McGuffinL. J. (2017). Predictive and experimental approaches for elucidating protein-protein interactions and quaternary structures.Int. J. Mol. Sci.18:E2623.

  • 94

    NikolausT.DeiwickJ.RapplC.FreemanJ. A.SchroderW.MilllerS. I.et al (2001). SseBCD proteins are secreted by the type III secretion system of Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 and function as a translocon.J. Bacteriol.18360366045. 10.1128/jb.183.20.6036-6045.2001

  • 95

    NotomistaE.LahmA.Di DonatoA.TramontanoA. (2003). Evolution of bacterial and archaeal multicomponent monooxygenases.J. Mol. Evol.56435445. 10.1007/s00239-002-2414-1

  • 96

    PetersenT. N.BrunakS.von HeijneG.NielsenH. (2011). SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions.Nat. Methods8785786. 10.1038/nmeth.1701

  • 97

    PodarM.MakarovaK. S.GrahamD. E.WolfY. I.KooninE. V.ReysenbachA. L. (2013). Insights into archaeal evolution and symbiosis from the genomes of a nanoarchaeon and its inferred crenarchaeal host from Obsidian Pool, Yellowstone National Park.Biol. Direct.8:9.

  • 98

    PoulsenC.AkhterY.JeonA. H.Schmitt-UlmsG.MeyerH. E.StefanskiA.et al (2010). Proteome-wide identification of mycobacterial pupylation targets.Mol. Syst. Biol.6:386. 10.1038/msb.2010.39

  • 99

    PrakashD.WaltersK. A.MartinieR. J.McCarverA. C.KumarA. K.LessnerD. J.et al (2018). Toward a mechanistic and physiological understanding of a ferredoxin:disulfide reductase from the domains archaea and bacteria.J. Biol. Chem.29391989209. 10.1074/jbc.ra118.002473

  • 100

    PrathivirajR.ChellapandiP. (2019). Functional annotation of operome from Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus ΔH: An insight to metabolic gap filling.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.123350362. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.100

  • 101

    PrathivirajR.ChellapandiP. (2020). Comparative genomic analysis reveals starvation survival systems in Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus ΔH.Anaerobe64:102216. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102216

  • 102

    PrathivirajR.ChellapandiP. (2020a). Comparative genomic analysis reveals starvation survival systems in Methanothermobacter thermoautotrophicus ΔH.Anaerobe64:102216.

  • 103

    PrathivirajR.ChellapandiP. (2020b). Modeling a global regulatory network of Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus strain ΔH.Netw. Model. Anal. Health Inform. Bioinform.9:17.

  • 104

    PulendranB.AhmedR. (2006). Translating innate immunity into immunological memory: implications for vaccine development.Cell124849863. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.019

  • 105

    QuevillonE.SilventoinenV.PillaiS.HarteN.MulderN.ApweilerR.et al (2005). InterProScan: protein domains identifier.Nucleic Acids Res.33W116W120.

  • 106

    RadivojacP.ClarkW. T.OronT. R.SchnoesA. M.WittkopT.SokolovA.et al (2013). A large-scale evaluation of computational protein function prediction.Nat. Methods10221227.

  • 107

    RathV. L.AmmiratiM.LeMotteP. K.FennellK. F.MansourM. N.DanleyD. E.et al (2000). Activation of human liver glycogen phosphorylase by alteration of the secondary structure and packing of the catalytic core.Mol. Cell.6139148. 10.1016/s1097-2765(05)00006-7

  • 108

    RawlsK. S.YacovoneS. K.Maupin-FurlowJ. A. (2010). GlpR represses fructose and glucose metabolic enzymes at the level of transcription in the haloarchaeon Haloferax volcanii.J. Bacteriol.19262516260. 10.1128/jb.00827-10

  • 109

    RimonA.Kozachkov-MagrissoL.PadanE. (2012). The unwound portion dividing helix IV of NhaA undergoes a conformational change at physiological pH and lines the cation passage.Biochemistry5195609569. 10.1021/bi301030x

  • 110

    RodionovD. A.HebbelnP.EudesA.ter BeekJ.RodionovaI. A.ErkensG. B.et al (2009). A novel class of modular transporters for vitamins in prokaryotes.J. Bacteriol.1914251. 10.1128/jb.01208-08

  • 111

    RoschJ. W.GaoG.RidoutG.WangY. D.TuomanenE. I. (2009). Role of the manganese efflux system mntE for signalling and pathogenesis in Streptococcus pneumoniae.Mol. Microbiol.721225. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06638.x

  • 112

    SahraeianS. M.LuoK. R.BrennerS. E. (2015). SIFTER search: a web server for accurate phylogeny-based protein function prediction.Nucleic Acids Res.43W141W147.

  • 113

    SangavaiC.PrathivirajR.ChellapandiP. (2020). Functional prediction, characterization and categorization of operome from Acetoanaerobium sticklandii DSM 519.Anaerobe61:102088. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.102088

  • 114

    SchlictmanD.KuboM.ShankarS.ChakrabartyA. M. (1995). Regulation of nucleoside diphosphate kinase and secretable virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: roles of algR2 and algH.J. Bacteriol.17724692474. 10.1128/jb.177.9.2469-2474.1995

  • 115

    ShahbaazM.HassanM. I.AhmadF. (2013). Functional annotation of conserved hypothetical proteins from Haemophilus influenzae Rd KW20.PLoS One8:e84263. 10.1371/journal.pone.0084263

  • 116

    ShapiroL.HarrisT. (2000). Finding function through structural genomics.Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.113135. 10.1016/s0958-1669(99)00064-6

  • 117

    ShrivastavaA. K.KumarS.SahuP. S.MahapatraR. K. (2017). In silico identification and validation of a novel hypothetical protein in Cryptosporidium hominis and virtual screening of inhibitors as therapeutics.Parasitol Res.11615331544. 10.1007/s00436-017-5430-1

  • 118

    SinghG.SinghV. (2018). Functional elucidation of hypothetical proteins for their indispensable roles toward drug designing targets from Helicobacter pylori strain HPAG1.J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.1:13.

  • 119

    SinghS.SinghS. K.ChowdhuryI.SinghR. (2017). Understanding the mechanism of bacterial biofilms resistance to antimicrobial agents.Open Microbiol. J.115362. 10.2174/1874285801711010053

  • 120

    SivashankariS.ShanmughavelP. (2006). Functional annotation of hypothetical proteins - A review.Bioinformation1335338. 10.6026/97320630001335

  • 121

    TerstappenG. C.ReggianiA. (2001). In silico research in drug discovery.Trends Pharmacol. Sci.222326.

  • 122

    ThieringerH. A.JonesP. G.InouyeM. (1998). Cold shock and adaptation.Bioessays204957. 10.1002/(sici)1521-1878(199801)20:1<49::aid-bies8>3.0.co;2-n

  • 123

    ThompsonJ. D.GibsonT. J.HigginsD. G. (2002). Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX.Curr. Protoc. Bioinform.22.3.

  • 124

    TusnádyG. E.SimonI. (2001). The HMMTOP transmembrane topology prediction server.Bioinformatics17849850. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.9.849

  • 125

    UnterholznerS. J.PoppenbergerB.RozhonW. (2013). Toxin-antitoxin systems: Biology, identification, and application.Mob. Genet. Elements3:e26219. 10.4161/mge.26219

  • 126

    VershonA. K.BowieJ. U.KarplusT. M.SauerR. T. (1986). Isolation and analysis of arc repressor mutants: evidence for an unusual mechanism of DNA binding.Proteins1302311. 10.1002/prot.340010404

  • 127

    von HeijneG. (1988). Transcending the impenetrable: how proteins come to terms with membranes.Biochim. Biophys. Acta947307333. 10.1016/0304-4157(88)90013-5

  • 128

    WeinitschkeS.DengerK.CookA. M.SmitsT. H. (2007). The DUF81 protein TauE in Cupriavidus necator H16, a sulfite exporter in the metabolism of C2 sulfonates.Microbiol15330553060. 10.1099/mic.0.2007/009845-0

  • 129

    WinnenB.HvorupR. N.SaierM. H. (2003). The tripartite tricarboxylate transporter (TTT) family.Res. Microbiol.154457465. 10.1016/s0923-2508(03)00126-8

  • 130

    XuZ.NieP.SunB.ChangM. (2007). Molecular identification and expression analysis of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 2 in grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idella.Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin.39857868. 10.1111/j.1745-7270.2007.00355.x

  • 131

    YellaboinaS.GoyalK.MandeS. C. (2007). Inferring genome-wide functional linkages in E. coli by combining improved genome context methods: comparison with high-throughput experimental data.Genome Res.17527535. 10.1101/gr.5900607

  • 132

    YuN. Y.WagnerJ. R.LairdM. R.MelliG.ReyS.LoR.et al (2010). PSORTb 3.0: improved protein subcellular localization prediction with refined localization subcategories and predictive capabilities for all prokaryotes.Bioinformatics2616081615. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq249

  • 133

    ZarembinskiT.HungL. W.Mueller-DieckmannH. J.KimK. K.YokotaH.KimR.et al (1998). Structure-based assignment of the biochemical function of a hypothetical protein: a test case of structural genomics.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.U.S.A.951518915193. 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15189

  • 134

    ZhangT.TanP.WangL.JinN.LiY.ZhangL.et al (2017). RNALocate: a resource for RNA subcellular localizations.Nucleic Acids Res.45D135D138.

  • 135

    ZmijewskiM. A.KwiatkowskaJ. M.LipińskaB. (2004). Complementation studies of the DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE chaperone machineries from Vibrio harveyi and Escherichia coli, both in vivo and in vitro.Arch. Microbiol.182436449. 10.1007/s00203-004-0727-8

Summary

Keywords

methanobrevibacter, methane mitigation, hypothetical proteins, protein function, molecular machinery

Citation

Bharathi M, Senthil Kumar N and Chellapandi P (2020) Functional Prediction and Assignment of Methanobrevibacter ruminantium M1 Operome Using a Combined Bioinformatics Approach. Front. Genet. 11:593990. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.593990

Received

12 August 2020

Accepted

17 November 2020

Published

16 December 2020

Volume

11 - 2020

Edited by

Saumya Patel, Gujarat University, India

Reviewed by

Khanh N. Q. Le, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan; Sailu Yellaboina, CR Rao Advanced Institute of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, India

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: P. Chellapandi,

This article was submitted to Computational Genomics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics