Impact Factor 3.086 | CiteScore 3.08
More on impact ›

Original Research ARTICLE Provisionally accepted The full-text will be published soon. Notify me

Front. Mar. Sci. | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00679

Microplastics on the menu: Plastics Pollute Indonesian Manta Ray and Whale Shark Feeding Grounds

 Elitza S. Germanov1, 2, 3*, Andrea D. Marshall2,  I Gede Hendrawan4,  Ryan Admiraal5, 6,  Christoph A. Rohner2,  Janis Argeswara4, Wulandari Raka4, Mahardika R. Himawan7 and  Neil R. Loneragan1, 8
  • 1Environmental & Conservation Sciences, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Australia
  • 2Marine Megafauna Foundation, United States
  • 3Aquatic Megafauna Research Unit, Murdoch University, Australia
  • 4Department of Marine Science, Faculty of Marine Sciences and Fisheries, Udayana University, Indonesia
  • 5School of Mathematics and Statistics, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
  • 6Murdoch University, Australia
  • 7University of Mataram, Indonesia
  • 8Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Bogor Agricultural University, Indonesia

The implications of plastic pollution, including microplastics, on marine ecosystems and species are increasingly seen as an environmental disaster. Yet few reports focus on filter-feeding megafauna in regions heavily impacted by plastic pollution, such as Indonesia in the Coral Triangle, a global marine biodiversity hotspot. Here, we evaluate plastic abundance and characterize debris from feeding grounds for manta rays (Mobula alfredi) and whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) in three coastal locations in Indonesia: Nusa Penida Marine Protected Area, Komodo National Park, and Pantai Bentar, East Java. A 200 µm plankton net was used to sample the top 0.5 m of the water column (‘trawl survey’) and floating plastics were assessed along ~ 440 m long transects (‘visual survey’) during the Indonesian north-west (‘wet’) and south-east (‘dry’) monsoon seasons during 2016 – 2018. Microplastics were identified visually, measured and categorized from trawl samples, and larger floating plastics were counted from vessels in visual transects. Plastic abundance ranged widely from 0.04 to 0.90 pieces m-3 (trawl survey) and 210 to 40,844 pieces km-2 (visual survey). Results from linear models showed significant seasonal and location differences in estimated plastic abundance for trawl and visual surveys in Nusa Penida and Komodo. Plastic abundance was up to ~ 44 times higher in the wet than the dry season, with the largest seasonal effect observed in Nusa Penida. Overall, small pieces < 5 mm (≥ 78%), films and fragments (> 50% combined) were the most prevalent plastics. Theoretical plastic ingestion rates were calculated using estimated filtration volumes of manta rays and whale sharks and the mean plastic abundance in their feeding grounds. Upper plastic ingestion estimates for manta rays were ~ 63 and 25 pieces h-1 for Nusa Penida and Komodo locations, respectively, and ~137 pieces h-1 for whale sharks in Java. Analysis of manta ray egested material confirmed plastic ingestion, the consequences of which might include exposure to toxic plastic additives and adhered persistent organic pollutants. Communicating this information to communities who stand to benefit from healthy megafauna populations might help local governments as they work towards reducing plastics in the marine environment.

Keywords: Mobula alfredi, Rhincodon typus, marine debris, conservation ecology, flagship species, Base-line, seasonal, Coastal survey

Received: 02 Aug 2019; Accepted: 18 Oct 2019.

Copyright: © 2019 Germanov, Marshall, Hendrawan, Admiraal, Rohner, Argeswara, Raka, Himawan and Loneragan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mrs. Elitza S. Germanov, Environmental & Conservation Sciences, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia,