- 1UNESIS (Unidad de Ecología y Sistemática), Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
- 2Unidad Académica Mazatlán, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mazatlán, Sinaloa, Mexico
- 3Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (UNMDP) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Mar del Plata, Argentina
- 4Licenciatura en Oceanología, Instituto de Recursos, Universidad del Mar, Cd. Universitaria SN, Puerto Ángel, Oaxaca, Mexico
- 5Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Carretera Ensenada-Tijuana, Ensenada, Mexico
Editorial on the Research Topic
Ocean acidification in Latin America
1 Advances and challenges in ocean acidification research in Latin America: towards a comprehensive regional vision
Ocean acidification is among the most significant threats to marine ecosystems worldwide, with profound implications for biodiversity, food security, and coastal economies (Gattuso et al., 2023). The Latin American region, with its vast coastline (approximately 59,960 km) and productive marine areas, hosts some of the planet’s most biodiverse ecosystems, including those in the Humboldt Current, the Tropical West Atlantic, the Pacific Central-American Coastal regions, the Gulf of California and the Southwest Atlantic. These ecosystems are critical to livelihoods and climate regulation, supporting diverse habitats such as coral reefs, mangroves, salt marshes, sandy beaches and kelp forests. However, they face significant threats from pollution, degradation, and are particularly vulnerable to changes in ocean chemistry. The studies compiled in this Research Topic of Frontiers in Marine Science provide crucial, up-to-date evidence on the complex interactions between global climate forcings and intricate local oceanographic variability, as well as their impacts on economically and ecologically important species, providing a detailed, multidimensional picture of the region’s specific vulnerabilities and resilience mechanisms. This editorial summarizes the 11 studies in this Research Topic, highlighting the advances in understanding OA in Latin America.
2 Synthesis of the Research Topic: an integrated vision of regional research
The research compiled in this Research Topic reveals a mature, multidimensional scientific landscape, where diverse methodological approaches, geographical regions, and biological groups intertwine to offer a more comprehensive understanding of ocean acidification in Latin America. The emerging body of work shows a scientific community successfully transitioning from specific descriptive studies initiated in the early 21st century toward integrative research that captures the complexity of the phenomenon and its underlying physical, chemical, and biological mechanisms.
This methodological evolution manifests through three complementary approaches that constitute the backbone of regional research. High-resolution environmental monitoring in the Colombian and Mexican Pacific has captured the variability of the carbonate system at daily and seasonal scales, while observational programs have been established in critical ecosystems such as Caribbean rhodolith beds. In parallel, controlled experimentation has generated fundamental knowledge of physiological stress response mechanisms, ranging from biochemical adaptations in Antarctic mollusks to differential tolerance in infaunal bivalves subjected to combined acidification and food limitation. Complementing these approaches, the advanced statistical modeling developed for the Gulf of Mexico represents a qualitative leap by enabling the spatial reconstruction of acidification parameters using Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms, overcoming the limitations of traditional sampling.
Geographically, the studies trace a comprehensive arc spanning the Eastern Tropical Pacific, the Caribbean, the sub-Antarctic regions and Antarctica. The Pacific emerges as an area of special interest, with seminal contributions in Colombia unraveling CO2 dynamics during La Niña events, and Costa Rica identifying key factors for coral reef development. The Caribbean region demonstrates notable scientific productivity, with advances in understanding rhodolith beds as potential biogeochemical refuges, and studies from Puerto Rico on the impact of Sargassum influx, and tri-national capacity assessments.
The biological dimension of the research effort spans from organismal responses to ecosystem dynamics. Mollusks emerge as a paradigmatic study group, with research ranging from physiological responses in Antarctic snails to tolerance studies in Chilean infaunal bivalves. Benthic ecosystems receive special attention, particularly Caribbean rhodolith beds and Pacific reef systems, while planktonic communities are indirectly addressed through their relationship with CO2 fluxes in the southwestern Atlantic and the Colombian Pacific.
The studies’ temporality evidences growing methodological sophistication, articulated across three complementary scales. Short-term, high-resolution investigations capture hourly and daily variability in the carbonate system in specific scenarios, while seasonal-scale studies unravel intra-annual cycles in systems subjected to ENSO events, upwelling, seasonal rainfall, and river discharge. Long-term initiatives, coupled with regional capacity assessments, lay the foundations for sustained monitoring programs and propose roadmaps for scientific development in the coming decades. Exploring innovative financing mechanisms, such as blue carbon credits, could provide a sustainable funding source for these critical long-term efforts.
3 Expanded Latin American context: scientific progress and regional complexity
The relevance and significance of these findings are considerably magnified when contextualized within the broader panorama of contemporary Latin American ocean acidification (OA) research. This region possesses an exceptional diversity of marine systems that serve as unique natural laboratories for studying ocean acidification under extreme and variable environmental conditions. From the planet’s most productive upwelling systems and estuarine coastal zones to extensive tropical river mouths and complex Mesoamerican reef systems, Latin America —spanning the Gulf of Mexico, the Caribbean, and the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans— offers a complete spectrum of conditions for understanding how ocean chemistry responds to multiple climatic and oceanographic forcings.
However, this environmental richness and complexity are accompanied by a significant and persistent scarcity of systematic, long-term data, a fundamental limitation that has begun to be addressed through visionary collaborative initiatives. The creation of research networks like the tri-national network for the Gulf of Mexico (Cuba, Mexico, and the U.S.) to address the socioeconomic and ecological impacts of open and coastal acidification; the strategic formation of the GOA-ON Caribbean Hub, the Latin American Ocean Acidification Network (LAOCA), which reached its 10th anniversary in November 2025, and the Research Network of Marine-Coastal Stressors in Latin America and the Caribbean (REMARCO) represent crucial and well-oriented efforts to overcome historical barriers of technical capacity, limited infrastructure, inefficient scientific communication, and insufficient funding that have characterized regional marine research for decades.
Innovative research on the southwestern Atlantic shelf and the Colombian Pacific underscores the critical need for this collaborative approach, revealing that the spatial and seasonal variability in CO2 fluxes is too complex for conventional large-scale climate models to capture with sufficient accuracy. Collectively, these studies illustrate a regional scientific community undergoing rapid growth and maturation, one that is beginning to produce robust, context-specific data essential for understanding the unique interplay between global stressors and local drivers that characterize our seas.
4 Future challenges and research directions
The studies presented in this Research Topic not only advance our knowledge but also critically illuminate the specific gaps that Latin America must overcome. These works represent a fundamental step in transitioning from a general diagnosis of ocean acidification to the development of applied solutions and informed policies.
4.1 Overcoming disparities in scientific capacity and governance
One of the most profound challenges is inequality in scientific production. The aforementioned network initiatives are vital strategies to counteract structural disparities. These networks promote equity in knowledge generation, standardize methodologies, and strengthen regional governance. However, persistent challenges include: technical and legal barriers to inclusive participation, the development of open-access databases and knowledge exchange platforms, and the need to incorporate considerations of food security, livelihoods, equity, transparency, and public participation.
4.2 Integrating knowledge into public policies and the transition toward decarbonization
Growing pollution and massive Sargassum events underscore how organic carbon fluxes exacerbate coastal acidification. Addressing this requires closing the gap between science and action through robust policies. It is fundamental to understand that acidification is a problem directly driven by CO2, and that technological solutions like Solar Radiation Management (SRM) cannot directly address ocean acidification (Williamson and Turley, 2012). SRM, which seeks to reflect sunlight to cool the planet, does not reverse the ocean chemistry altered by CO2 and could even redistribute acidity to greater depths. Therefore, the primary solution is the decarbonization of our economies and a drastic reduction in CO2 emissions (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2023). Promoting a circular economy and implementing Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) and the restoration of blue carbon ecosystems are essential tools for this transition, transforming scientific evidence into regulatory action. Concurrently, research into marine Carbon Dioxide Removal (mCDR) techniques is accelerating. These include ocean nutrient fertilization (with N, P, Fe); macroalgal cultivation and sinking; direct ocean capture; ocean alkalinity enhancement via electrochemical or other means; ecosystem restoration; and artificial upwelling-downwelling. It is critical to note that all of these potential solutions require extensive validation, risk assessment, and scaling studies before deployment. Furthermore, implementing ethical and regulatory frameworks is essential to mitigate potential ecological risks associated with new research and technologies (mCDR).
4.3 Scaling up monitoring and addressing coastal complexity in a global context
The scarcity of historical data in the region is a critical barrier. Long-term time series, like those from the ESTOC station in the North Atlantic, are invaluable as they confirm that the surface ocean is actively absorbing anthropogenic carbon and undergoing acidification, with trends accelerating in recent decades (González-Dávila and Santana-Casiano, 2023). Statistical modeling depends on these sustained observations for validation. It is imperative to scale up monitoring efforts —potentially funded through diverse sources including private investment (e.g., carbon credits), philanthropy, and government and academic grants— to capture the complex interaction dynamics within Latin American coastal zones, where river inputs, upwelling, and extreme climate events create a mosaic of acidification conditions. Understanding these interactions is essential for refining global predictive models.
5 Conclusion: towards a unified regional vision on a warming planet
Latin American science on ocean acidification has demonstrated its technical maturity and regional relevance. The pioneering studies in this Research Topic substantially enrich global knowledge and provide a solid evidence base for decision-makers to effectively protect valuable marine resources.
However, the future health of Latin American oceans is inextricably linked to global efforts to mitigate global warming. The most recent scientific evidence confirms that we have reached the first global climate tipping point: the widespread collapse of warm-water coral reefs (Armstrong McKay et al., 2022). This finding, recently highlighted in the Global Tipping Points Report (Lenton et al., 2025), underscores the extreme urgency of the situation. The ocean, which absorbs approximately 30% of annual anthropogenic CO2, has been a powerful ally in mitigating warming, but at an enormous cost to its chemistry and ecosystems (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2023). This vital service of natural decarbonization is threatened by acidification itself, which may weaken the ocean’s capacity to store carbon in the future (Hu, et al., 2024). Therefore, protecting the ocean through an urgent and drastic reduction in CO2 emissions is not only a matter of marine conservation but an essential strategy for global climate stability. OA studies are critical to this endeavor, providing insights into the species, life stages, and habitats most sensitive to changes in carbonate chemistry. This knowledge establishes the scientific baseline needed to monitor, report, and verify (MRV) the efficacy of any ocean-based CO2 reduction or removal strategy. Given that current estimates indicate the need to remove approximately 10 gigatons of CO2 per year from the global oceans by 2050, it is clear that traditional mitigation methods alone are insufficient, and a portfolio of strategies, informed by robust OA research, is urgently required.
The path forward demands strengthened regional collaboration, sustained investment in local scientific capacity, and firm political determination to close the gap between knowledge and action. The visionary commitments we collectively assume today, guided by science and oriented toward a global energy transition and the responsible development of marine carbon dioxide removal methods, are the only way to ensure the health of Latin American oceans and the well-being of the millions of people who depend on them.
Author contributions
AA: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. J-AS-C: Writing – review & editing. BL: Writing – review & editing. CC-B: Writing – review & editing. JH-A: Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Armstrong McKay D. I., Staal A., Abrams J. F., Winkelmann R., Sakschewski B., Loriani S., et al. (2022). Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. Science 377, eabn7950. doi: 10.1126/science.abn7950
Gattuso J. P., Magnan A. K., Bopp L., Cheung W. W. L., Duarte C. M., Hinkel J., et al. (2023). Ocean solutions to address climate change and its effects on marine ecosystems. Front. Mar. Sci. 10. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00337
González-Dávila M. and Santana-Casiano J. M. (2023). Long-term trends of pH and inorganic carbon in the Eastern North Atlantic: the ESTOC site. Front. Mar. Sci. 1236214. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1236214
Hoegh-Guldberg O., Jacob D., Taylor M., Bindi M., Brown S., Camilloni I., et al. (2023). The human imperative of stabilizing global climate change at 1.5°C. Science 365, eaaw6974. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw6974
Hu N., Bourdeau P. E., and Hollander J. (2024). Responses of marine trophic levels to the combined effects of ocean acidification and warming. Nat. Commun. 15, 3400. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47563-3
Lenton T. M., Milkoreit M., Willcock S., Abrams J. F., Armstrong McKay D. I., Buxton J. E., et al. (2025). The Global Tipping Points Report 2025. Exeter, UK: University of Exeter.
Keywords: CO2, Latin America, OA, ocean acidification, oceanography
Citation: Acosta A, Sanchez-Cabeza J-A, Lomovasky BJ, Chapa-Balcorta C and Hernandez-Ayon JM (2026) Editorial: Ocean acidification in Latin America. Front. Mar. Sci. 12:1760804. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1760804
Received: 04 December 2025; Accepted: 10 December 2025;
Published: 12 January 2026.
Edited and reviewed by:
Eric ‘Pieter Achterberg, Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres (HZ), GermanyCopyright © 2026 Acosta, Sanchez-Cabeza, Lomovasky, Chapa-Balcorta and Hernandez-Ayon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alberto Acosta, bGFhY29zdGFAamF2ZXJpYW5hLmVkdS5jbw==