Clinical efficacy of tetrandrine in artificial stone-associated silicosis: A retrospective cohort study

Introduction

Artificial stone (AS) has been widely used in the manufacture of kitchen and bathroom countertops since the 1980s (1). The popularity of this product has increased all over the world due to its compact structure, low water absorption, high temperature resistance, and corrosion resistance. The first case report of AS-associated silicosis was published in Spain in 2010 (2). Since then, outbreaks of silicosis among AS workers have been reported around the world (3–5). It has been noted that AS-associated silicosis progresses more rapidly and has a worse prognosis than non-AS-associated silicosis due to exposing dust containing crystalline silica over 90% (6–8). Importantly, there is currently no effective antifibrosis treatment for silicosis.

Tetrandrine (Tet) is a bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloid isolated from the root of Stephania tetrandra (9). Although the treatment effect of this compound on silicosis has been studied since the 1980s, its effect on the progression of silicosis fibrosis, especially in accelerated silicosis, remains to be established. Most previous studies about the effect of Tet on silicosis have focused on pulmonary function and clinical symptoms (10–12), while the manifestations of the condition in computed tomography imaging, a method used routinely for evaluation of lung disease, are still unclear. Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of AS-associated silicosis patients who had been treated with or without Tet in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (China) in recent years and focused on the high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings.

Materials and methods

Study participants

In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed the clinical data of patients with AS-associated silicosis who were treated in Pneumoconiosis Department of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital between December 2015 and December 2021. Patients who agreed to be prescribed Tet entered the observation group and those who disagreed entered the control group.

Eligibility

Patients were enrolled to this study according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) aged between 18 and 70 years; (2) exposed to AS dust while cutting, grinding, and drilling AS slabs before visiting hospital; (3) diagnosed as silicosis; (4) removed from continued dust exposure; and (5) had more than one chest HRCT examination performed. A total of 284 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients with comorbidities such as tuberculous mycobacterial infection, lung tumor, respiratory infection, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and asthma were excluded. Patients with other interstitial lung diseases or those with heart, brain, liver, kidney, and other organ dysfunction were also excluded. After exclusion, 89 patients were left, in which 47 patients were of observation group and 42 of control group (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Study Flowchart of Patient Enrollment.

Therapeutic method

The patients in the control group were given symptomatic treatments as needed such as inhaled or oral bronchodilators, mucolytics as Mytol Standardized. Besides symptomatic treatment, the patients in the observation group received Tet (Zhejiang Jinhua Conba Biopharma Co., Ltd.; SFDA approval no. H33022075) administered at 60 mg/dose, three times per day for 6 days and then stopped for 1 day; this course of treatment lasted 3 months. After stopping for 1 month, the next course of treatment was administered.

End-point measures

The primary end-point was the change in HRCT after treatment determined by re-reading and recording of images obtained pre-treatment, compared with those obtained at 3 months (after 2–4 months of treatment), 6 months (after 5–7 months of treatment), and 12 months (after 10–14 months of treatment) by a radiologist and a qualified physician from the pneumoconiosis department. The following indicators were recorded: ground-glass opacity (GGO), nodule opacity, progressive massive fibrosis (PMF), patchy opacity, emphysema, bullae, and dot-line opacity (13). Any of the following identified after treatment were classified as HRCT progression: (1) diffuse GGOs appear or increase; (2) PMF appear or extend; (3) diffuse nodules opacities increase; (4) emphysema and bullae appear or worsen. Any of the following identified after treatment were classified as HRCT improvement: (1) diffuse GGOs decrease or resolve; (2) smaller PMF without perifocal emphysema or worsening bullae; (3) diffuse nodules reduction; and (4) patchy opacities reduction. Stable HRCT was defined as no progression or improvement after treatment.

Secondary end-points were pulmonary function and clinical symptoms. Pulmonary function tests were performed as per the ATS/ERS recommendations (14, 15) and measured with a clinical spirometer (Jaeger Crop., Höchberg, Germany) by specialists from the department of pulmonary function in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. The pulmonary function indexes pre-treatment and at 3 months (after 2–4 months of treatment), 6 months (after 5–7 months of treatment), and 12 months (after 10–14 months of treatment) were obtained from the patients’ medical records. The following pulmonary function indexes were recorded: forced vital capacity (FVC) and its percentage of the predicted value (FVC%); forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) and its percentage of the predicted value (FEV₁%); and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) and its percentage of the predicted value (DLco%).

The occurrence of clinical symptoms (cough, expectoration, dyspnea, chest tightness, and chest pain) in the two groups pre-treatment and at 3 months (after 2–4 months of treatment), 6 months (after 5–7 months of treatment), and 12 months (after 10–14 months of treatment) was recorded from the medical records.

Adverse effects: Adverse effects related to Tet treatment in the observation group were recorded according to outpatient and inpatient medical records.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative data that were consistent with normal distribution were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and the differences between groups were evaluated by Student’s t-test. When the variance was uneven, the corrected t-test was used. Quantitative data that were not consistent with normal distribution were expressed as the median and interquartile range, and the differences between groups were evaluated by the Mann–Whitney U-test. Qualitative data were expressed as relative numbers, and the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used for comparison between groups. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the rate of progression, and the log-rank test was used to compare the distribution of survival curves between two groups. All data analyses were conducted using SPSS version 25.0, Microsoft Excel 2021 for database construction, and GraphPad Prism 8.3.0 for drawing. p < 0.05 was set as the threshold for statistical significance. It should be noted that indications of pulmonary function were not consistent with normal distribution, non-parametric tests were adopted for the statistical significance of the differences. To facilitate intuitive interpretation of the data, normally distributed data were presented.

Results

Demographic characteristics

A total of 89 patients were enrolled in this study consisting of 47 cases in the observation group (average age 37.4 ± 12.1 years) and 42 cases in the control group (average age 37.7 ± 8.6 years). There were no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index (BMI), dust-exposure time, smoking status, or PMF rates between the two groups (all p > 0.05; Table 1). The shortest dust-exposure time among all subjects was 2 years and the longest was 20 years.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the observation and control groups.

Case examples

In Case 1, a 26-year-old male in observation group with 5 years of exposure, the manifestation observed in the HRCT images did not show deterioration over 31 months and pulmonary function improved. In Case 2, a 29-year-old male in the control group with 6 years of exposure, aggravated on HRCT and pulmonary function over 32 months. In Case 3, a 44-year-old male in observation group with 8 years of exposure, HRCT progressed and pulmonary function decreased in 27 months after first registration and improved after 20 months’ treatment with Tet (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Changes of HRCT and pulmonary function of representative cases. Case 1 of the observation group. (A) HRCT showed diffuse GGOs, extensive nodular opacities, and para-aortic lymph node enlargement at baseline. (B) GGOs was significantly reduced after 4 months. (C) GGOs dissipated without coalescence or PMF emerging after 31 months of treatment. (D) The pulmonary function indexes FVC%, FEV₁%, and DLco% showed an increasing trend. Case 2 of the control group. (E) HRCT showed PMF on bilateral lungs at baseline. (F) The left lung PMF enlarged and the right lung PMF contracted centripetally with emphysema developing 13 months later. (G) The lesion on HRCT continued to progress and the emphysema worsened. (H) Correspondingly, the pulmonary function gradually decreased. Case 3 began Tet treatment after the second HRCT. (I,M) Cross-sectional and coronal HRCT images showed diffusely distributed nodules at baseline. (J,N) Nodule opacities increased and coalescence emerged in the right upper lung 27 months later. (K,O) GGO around the coalescence in the right upper lung dissipated and the coalescence had not progressed after 20 months of Tet treatment. (L) The pulmonary function decreased over 27 months without Tet treatment and increased over 20 months with Tet treatment. This case was included in the observation group.

Changes in HRCT

The chest HRCT characters of AS-associated silicosis were GGO, nodule opacities, patchy opacity, PMF, emphysema, bullae, and dot-line opacity. There were no significant differences between the observation and control groups in the incidence of changes in GGO, nodule opacities, patchy opacity, PMF, emphysema, bullae, and dot-line opacity at baseline (all p > 0.05).

After 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment, the rates of improvement in the HRCT features in the observation group were 65.38, 56.52, and 63.16%, respectively, while no improvements were observed in the control group, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.001, Table 2). Improvements in HRCT imaging are mainly manifested by the reduction or dissipation of ground-glass opacities, the reduction of nodal opacities, and the shrinkage of PMF. The rates of progression rates in the control group at 3, 6, 12 months were 52.94, 44.44, and 92.00%, while the rates in the observation were 0, 17.39 and 5.26%, respectively, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.001, Table 2).

TABLE 2

Table 2. Changes in HRCT features of the observation and control groups after treatment [n (%)].

Pulmonary function

Most of the subjects exhibited restrictive ventilatory dysfunction and impaired diffusion function at baseline. In the 3-month cohort, the FVC%, FEV₁%, and DLco% values of the control group were all significantly higher than those of the observation group at enrollment (p < 0.05; Table 3). After 3 months of treatment, both FEV₁% and DLco% values of the observation group increased, while those of the control group decreased, with statistically significant differences between the pre- and post-treatment values of these indexes between the two groups (p < 0.05; Table 3). In the 6-month cohort, the FVC% and FEV₁% values of the observation group increased, while those of the control group decreased, with statistically significant differences between the pre- and post-treatment values of these indexes between the two groups (p < 0.05; Table 3).

TABLE 3

Table 3. Changes of pulmonary function indexes of the observation and control groups after treatment.

In the 3-and 6-month cohorts, the average increases of FVC in the observation group were 136.7 ± 189.2 mL (p = 0.029) and 207.8 ± 372.3 mL (p = 0.133), respectively, while the average increases in of FEV₁ were 124.2 ± 169.9 mL (p = 0.028), 107.8 ± 295.2 mL (p = 0.305), respectively, and the averages increases of DLco were 1.4 ± 2.3 mL/min/mmHg (p = 0.068), 0.7 ± 6.0 mL/min/mmHg (p = 0.838), respectively (Figure 3). Pulmonary function improvement cases were accompanied by a decrease or disappearance of GGO on HRCT images.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. The changes of pulmonary function in the observation group and control group. DLco was not measured for one subject in each of the 3-month and 12-month cohorts. (A) The 3-month cohort of observation group. (B) The 6-month cohort of observation group. (C) The 3-month cohort of control group. (D) The 6-month cohort of control group. (E) The 12-month cohort of control group.

In the 3-, 6-, and 12-month cohorts, the average decreases of FVC in the control group were 145.8 ± 356.5 mL, 383.3 ± 536.7 mL, and 250.0 ± 388.8 mL, respectively (all p > 0.05), while the average decreases in FEV₁ were 107.5 ± 272.1 mL (p = 0.198), 215.6 ± 228.9 mL (p = 0.022), and 266.4 ± 419.3 mL (p = 0.061), respectively, and the average decreases in DLco were 1.9 ± 3.8 mL/min/mmHg (p = 0.132), 1.4 ± 1.7 mL/min/mmHg (p = 0.037), and 2.4 ± 2.0 mL/min/mmHg (p = 0.004; Figure 3).

Cumulative progression rate

The cumulative progression curves of the two groups based on HRCT progression as the terminal event are shown in Figure 4. There was a statistically significant difference in the cumulative progression rate between the control group (median progression survival time 8.367 months, 95% CI 4.57–12.16) and the observation group (Log-Rank p < 0.001). The cumulative progression rate in the observation was significantly lower than that in the control group.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Cumulative progression rate in the observation group and control groups.

Clinical symptoms

There were no significant differences in the incidence of clinical symptoms including cough, expectoration, dyspnea, chest tightness, and chest pain between the two groups at baseline (all p > 0.05). The incidence of all clinical symptoms in the observation group reduced in the 3-, 6-, and 12-month cohorts, with significant differences compared with those in the control group (all p < 0.05; Table 4).

TABLE 4

Table 4. Change of clinical symptoms [n (%)].

Adverse effects

The adverse effects related to Tet in the observation group included facial pigmentation (9/47, 19.2%), diarrhea (4/47, 8.5%), skin itching (2/47, 4.3%), nausea (1/47, 2.1%), fatigue (1/47, 2.1%), lethargy (1/47, 2.1%), and transient hepatic dysfunction (1/47, 2.1%).

Discussion

Silicosis is a systemic disease characterized by pulmonary fibrosis, mainly caused by long-term inhalation of dust containing free silica. AS-associated silicosis is characterized by a shorter dust-exposure time, faster disease progression, higher lung transplantation rate, and mortality than natural stone silicosis (16). HRCT showed AS-associated silicosis with a 1-year progression rate of 72.2% (16). For a long time, there is no specific treatment for silicosis. Treatment of the comorbidities (such as tuberculosis) is the main treatment for silicosis, which is far from enough for the patients, especially for accelerated silicosis. It is necessary to take measures for controlling the progression of fibrosis so as to delay the decline of lung function and reduce premature deaths. Effective anti-fibrotic drugs are urgently required to treat accelerated silicosis with rapid progression and a higher mortality rate (16, 17). Drug screens for the treatment of silicosis were carried out in China since the 1970s, and tetrandrine was one of chemicals selected with potential effects.

Results from animal experiments indicated that Tet could promote the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) in lung tissue, inhibit the release of fibrotic factor from lung macrophages, and attenuate lung inflammation. Tet also inhibited the synthesis and release of glycosaminoglycans and lipids, inhibited the transcription of collagen genes, and degraded the collagen in the silicic nodules formed, thereby reducing and delaying silicosis fibrosis (18–20).

In our study, 56.5–65.4% of the patients in the observation group showed improvement in HRCT after 3–12 months of treatment. Cumulative progression rate analysis also showed that the progression rate of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group. The FVC, FEV1, and DLco values of the observation group improved with varying degrees after 3–6 months, while significant decreases in FEV₁ and DLco were observed in the control group. Improvements in lung function were always accompanied by improvements in HRCT imaging. These results are consistent with the early clinical research reported in the 1990s, which showed that treatment with combination of Tet with quinolyl piperazine hydroxyl phosphate (QOHP) or poly-2-vinyl pyridine-nitrogen oxide (PVNO) resulted in obvious inhibition of the process of fibrosis and improvement of clinical symptoms. Accelerated silicosis with the combination treatment showed X-ray improvement rates (22.4%) higher than other silicosis patients (5.7%) (21). In another study, treatment with Tet for 6 months resulted in improvements on chest X-rays in 24.8% of 117 silicosis patients (22). The higher rate of improvement in HRCT features in the observation group of the current study may be due to the higher density resolution of this imaging technique compared with chest X-rays.

Some limitations of this study should be noted. As a retrospective study, there may be selective bias exists in the study subjects; and cases with insufficient lung function test information were also a problem. Furthermore, in this study, we collected clinical data during only 12 months of treatment, the long-term efficacy of Tet treatment in accelerated and chronic silicosis patients remains to be established. Even so, the striking results achieved by the study cannot be ignored. As artificial stone-associated silicosis is a type of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (PF-ILD), this study indicated that the potential effect of Tet in treatment of other PF-ILD is worthy of further investigation.

Conclusion

Tet had a definite therapeutic effect on patients with accelerated silicosis with improvements in HRCT features and pulmonary function combined with delayed progression of fibrosis, few adverse effects were recorded.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

W-hW, Y-hF, C-yM, and LM applied conception, designed the research, and wrote the article. W-hW, LM, L-mH, JS, and HQ collected the clinical data. W-lY and LM interpreted the lung function data. S-wZ and Z-dC interpreted the radiologic data. W-hW, L-mM, Y-hF, G-hY, and JL analyzed and interpreted the clinical data. Y-hF and LM provided financial support fund and conducted the entire research. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81771692 and 81971558).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Hoy, RF, Baird, T, Hammerschlag, G, Hart, D, Johnson, AR, King, P, et al. Artificial stone-associated silicosis: a rapidly emerging occupational lung disease. Occup Environ Med. (2018) 75:3–5. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2017-104428

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Martínez, C, Prieto, A, García, L, Quero, A, González, S, and Casan, P. Silicosis: a disease with an active present. Arch Bronconeumol. (2010) 46:97–100. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2009.07.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Pascual Del Pobil, Y, Ferré, MA, García Sevila, R, García Rodenas, MDM, Barroso Medel, E, Flores Reos, E, et al. Silicosis: a former occupational disease with new occupational exposure scenarios. Silicosis: una antigua enfermedad profesional con nuevos escenarios de exposición laboral. Rev Clin Esp (Barc). (2019) 219:26–9. doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2018.06.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Ronsmans, S, Decoster, L, Keirsbilck, S, Verbeken, EK, and Nemery, B. Artificial stone-associated silicosis in Belgium. Occup Environ Med. (2019) 76:133–4. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105436

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Barber, CM, Fishwick, D, Seed, MJ, Carder, M, and van Tongeren, M. Artificial stone-associated silicosis in the UK. Occup Environ Med. (2018) 75:541.1–541.54541. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. León-Jiménez, A, Hidalgo-Molina, A, Conde-Sánchez, MÁ, Pérez-Alonso, A, Morales-Morales, JM, García-Gámez, EM, et al. Artificial stone silicosis: rapid progression following exposure cessation. Chest. (2020) 158:1060–8. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.026

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Quan, H, Wu, W, Yang, G, Wu, Y, Yang, W, Min, C, et al. Risk factors of silicosis progression: a retrospective cohort study in China. Front Med (Lausanne). (2022) 9:832052. Published 2022 Apr 4. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.832052

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Mao, L, Zhou, SW, Chen, ZD, Shi, J, Bian, LQ, Wen, J, et al. Investigation of clinical features and working environment of silicosis patients caused by agglomerated quartz stone processing dust. J Environ Occup Med. (2019) 36:744–9. doi: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2019.19260 Chinese

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Bhagya, N, and Chandrashekar, KR. Tetrandrine–a molecule of wide bioactivity. Phytochemistry. (2016) 125:5–13. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2016.02.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Guo, X, Qi, J, Li, H, and Xing, Z. Clinical efficacy of acetylcysteine combined with tetrandrine tablets on patients with silicosis and its effect on exercise tolerance and pulmonary function. Exp Ther Med. (2020) 20:1285–90. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8858

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Sun, J, Song, P, Wang, Y, and Chen, Y. Clinical efficacy of acetylcysteine combined with tetrandrine tablets in the treatment of silicosis and the effect on serum IL-6 and TNF-α. Exp Ther Med. (2019) 18:3383–8. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7966

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Zhang, J, Wang, Y, Zhang, S, Li, J, and Fang, H. Effects of tetrandrine combined with acetylcysteine on exercise tolerance, pulmonary function and serum TNF-β1 and MMP-7 in silicosis patients. Exp Ther Med. (2020) 19:2195–201. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8431

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Jones, CM, Pasricha, SS, Heinze, SB, and MacDonald, S. Silicosis in artificial stone workers: spectrum of radiological high-resolution CT chest findings. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. (2020) 64:241–9. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Macintyre, N, Crapo, RO, Viegi, G, Johnson, DC, van der Grinten, CP, Brusasco, V, et al. Standardisation of the single-breath determination of carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J. (2005) 26:720–35. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034905

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Miller, MR, Hankinson, J, Brusasco, V, Burgos, F, Casaburi, R, Coates, A, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. (2005) 26:319–38. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Wu, N, Xue, C, Yu, S, and Ye, Q. Artificial stone-associated silicosis in China: a prospective comparison with natural stone-associated silicosis. Respirology. (2020) 25:518–24. doi: 10.1111/resp.13744

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Hoy, RF. Artificial stone silicosis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. (2021) 21:114–20. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000715

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Jiang, HX, Hu, TX, Peng, BX, and Shi, DZ. A preliminary study of the mechanism of silicosis therapy by Tetrandrine. Chin J Tuberculosis Respir Dis. (1983) 6:92–4. Chinese.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

19. Li, QL, Xu, YH, Jiang, HX, Ma, GY, Hu, TX, and Wang, BS. Autopsy and Histochemical analysis: report of a case of silicosis treated with Tetrandrine. Chin J Tuberculosis Respir Dis. (1982) 5:243–4. Chinese.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

20. Zou, CQ, and Gu, ZR, Cooperative group of therapeutic study of Tetrandrine on silicosis. Observation of the therapeutic effect of Tetrandrine on experimental silicosis in rats Chinese. J Ind Hyg Occup Dis. (1983) 1:129–32. Chinese

Google Scholar

21. Li, DH, Task group of clinical evaluation on therepeutic effects of drug treatment for silicosis. Clincal trial and evaluation of treatment for Silocosis. Chin J Ind Hyg Occup Dis. (1996) 14:130–4. Chinese

Google Scholar

22. Lu, XR, Xu, YH, Gu, RS, and Zhang, C, Cooperative group of therapeutic study of Tetrandrine on silicosis. Clinical observation on the treatment of simple silicosis with Tetrandrine. Chin J Ind Hyg Occup Dis. (1983) 1:136–9. Chinese

Google Scholar