Endotrophin as a risk marker of mortality and kidney complications in a type 1 diabetes cohort
Alexandra Louise Møller1,2* 
Ninna Hahn Tougaard3 
Daniel Guldager Kring Rasmussen1 
Federica Genovese1 Pernille Falberg Rønn3 
Tine Willum Hansen3 Morten Asser Karsdal1 
Peter Rossing3,4- 1Nordic Bioscience, Herlev, Denmark
- 2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- 3Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
- 4Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Hyperglycemia triggers pathological pathways leading to fibrosis, where extracellular matrix (ECM) components are accumulated. We investigated the potential of endotrophin, a pro-fibrotic molecule generated during collagen type VI formation, as a risk marker for complications to type 1 diabetes. Endotrophin was measured in serum and urine from 1,468 persons with type 1 diabetes. Outcomes included a composite kidney endpoint, first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), all-cause mortality, progression of albuminuria, incident heart failure, and sight-threatening diabetic eye disease. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for conventional risk factors were applied. A doubling of serum endotrophin was independently associated with the kidney endpoint (n = 30/1,462; hazard ratio 3.39 [95% CI: 1.98–5.82]), all-cause mortality (n = 93/1,468; 1.44 [1.03–2.0]), and progression of albuminuria (n = 80/1,359; 1.82 [1.32–2.52]), but not with first MACE, heart failure, or sight-threatening diabetic eye disease after adjustment. Urinary endotrophin was not associated with any outcome after adjustment. Serum endotrophin was a risk marker for mortality and kidney complications in type 1 diabetes. Biomarkers of ECM remodeling, such as serum endotrophin, may identify persons with active pro-fibrotic processes at risk for complications in diabetes and where antifibrotic agents may reduce this risk.
Introduction
Persons with diabetes are at increased risk of complications related to the micro- and macrovascular circulation. The primary cause of premature mortality in persons with diabetes is cardiovascular disease (Baena-Díez et al., 2016), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) increase the overall risk of cardiovascular complications (Groop et al., 2009). Early intervention targeting several risk factors has been implemented, but new tools to predict complications before clinical manifestations are needed to improve risk stratification and personalize preventive treatment.
Hyperglycemia drives oxidative stress, inflammation, and tissue injury, eventually leading to fibrosis, characterized by an abnormal shift in the turnover of components of the extracellular matrix (ECM). However, differences in glycemic control do not fully explain the variation in the incidence and severity of complications. Despite the underlying etiology, kidney disease development is assumed to be driven by kidney fibrosis. As formation and degradation of ECM components are linked with the development of fibrosis (Bülow and Boor, 2019), assessment of markers of ECM turnover may identify persons with active pro-fibrotic processes at higher risk for complications related to diabetes. During fibrosis progression, peptides reflecting ECM remodeling, such as collagens, are released (Genovese et al., 2014). Collagens are an essential part of the fibrotic tissue, acting as both a scaffold for cells and an interaction partner for several proteins (Gelse et al., 2003; Liu, 2011; Genovese et al., 2014).
Interestingly, specific proteolysis-derived fragments of collagens can have vital signaling functions (Karsdal et al., 2015). The bioactive fragment, endotrophin, released during collagen type VI synthesis when the C-terminal pro-peptide of the α3 chain is cleaved off from the mature molecule (Aigner et al., 2002), is pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic (Park and Scherer, 2012; Karousou et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2016; Funcke and Scherer, 2019). Endotrophin is expressed by cells from the mesenchymal stem cells, including adipocytes and fibroblasts (Juhl et al., 2020; Møller, 2020; Rønnow et al., 2020), suggesting it to be a central ECM fragment associated with chronic fibro-inflammatory diseases.
In this large and unselected study cohort, including persons with type 1 diabetes, we aimed to validate the previous findings of endotrophin in type 1 diabetes (Pilemann-Lyberg et al., 2019) and investigate whether higher levels of serum and urinary endotrophin were associated with risk of progression of complications to type 1 diabetes.
Materials and methods
Research design and methods
The study is based on data and biobank material from the StenoDot cohort recruited from the outpatient clinic at Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Denmark from 2012 to 2016. The present study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by The Regional Ethics Committee in The Capital Region of Denmark (H-19042436). Detailed information about the research design and International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD)- and procedural codes for baseline and follow-up measures has previously been published (Tougaard et al., 2022). In short, the present study cohort included 1,468 individuals with type 1 diabetes, defined as an E10 diagnosis (ICD-10); or an E13 or E14 diagnosis, treated solely with insulin. Urinary albumin excretion rate (mg/24 h) and urine albumin-creatinine ratio (mg/g) were considered comparable measures and were pooled as a composite variable of urinary albumin excretion (UAE) (mg/g).
Demographic and clinical data were extracted from patient records, including retinal photo gradings and routine laboratory measurements. Information on hospital admissions, emigration, and deaths was obtained from national registers. Primary endpoints were 1) a composite kidney endpoint defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline of ≥40% confirmed after minimum 1 month or unconfirmed if the measurement was the last before end-of-follow-up, development of CKD stage 5, chronic dialysis, kidney transplantation, or kidney failure as cause of death, 2) first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) including cardiovascular death, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, coronary intervention, and non-fatal stroke, and 3) all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were 1) progression in albuminuria stage based on minimum one measurement, 2) incident heart failure, and 3) incident sight-threatening diabetic eye disease, including proliferative retinopathy and maculopathy based on retinal photos or procedural codes. Median follow-up was 6.4 years for the composite kidney endpoint, 6.3 years for MACE, 5.3 years for all-cause mortality, 6.3 years for albuminuria progression, 6.4 years for incident heart failure, and 3.1 years for sight-threatening diabetic eye disease. ICD-8, ICD-10, and procedural codes are provided in Supplementary Table S1.
Levels of endotrophin were measured in serum and urine at baseline using the PRO-C6 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Nordic Bioscience, Herlev, Denmark) (Sun et al., 2015). The ELISA was carried out as previously described (Sun et al., 2015). Urinary endotrophin levels were normalized to urinary creatinine levels. Urinary creatinine was measured using the ADVIA 1800 Clinical Chemistry System.
Statistical analyses
Baseline clinical characteristics were stratified by tertiles of serum and urinary endotrophin levels, respectively. All continuous clinical variables, except UAE, were normally distributed, and levels were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), whereas UAE levels were presented as median with median interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables were presented as total numbers with corresponding percentages. Differences among tertiles were assessed with one-way ANOVA for normally distributed variables, the Kruskal–Wallis test for non-normally distributed variables, and the χ2 test for categorical variables. The correlation between serum endotrophin and urinary endotrophin was tested by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.
In the longitudinal analyses, participants were followed until an event or censoring due to emigration, death, or end of follow-up. The association between a doubling of serum endotrophin and urinary endotrophin and incidence of the specified endpoints during follow-up was investigated by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, both unadjusted and adjusted for the conventional risk factors sex, baseline age, body mass index (BMI), low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, current smoking, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), systolic blood pressure, eGFR, and UAE (except for analyses of albuminuria progression). For each outcome, participants previously diagnosed with the outcome were excluded. The distribution of serum endotrophin, urinary endotrophin, and UAE was skewed, and these variables were log2-transformed before analyses. All two-tailed p < 0.05 were considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed using R (4.1.0).
Results
The cohort included 1,468 persons with type 1 diabetes. Serum samples were available for 1,446 persons (99%) of the total cohort and consisted of 712 (49%) females, mean age was 51 ± SD of 16 years, diabetes duration 26 ± 15 years, HbA1c 62 ± 12 mmol/mol, eGFR 94 ± 23 mL/min/1.73 m, and IQR of the last UAE was 5.5 (3.5–11.5) mg/g. The cohort with available serum samples consisted of 1,080 (75%) persons with normoalbuminuria, 260 (18%) with microalbuminuria, and 106 (7%) with macroalbuminuria. Urine samples were available for 1,251 persons (85%) of the total cohort.
Baseline characteristics stratified by serum endotrophin are shown in Table 1. Higher levels of serum endotrophin were associated with higher age, diabetes duration, BMI, UAE, systolic blood pressure; lower eGFR; a higher proportion were prescribed anti-hypertensive, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade, and lipid-lowering treatment; and a higher proportion with a history of MACE and sight-threatening diabetic eye disease (Table 1). Urinary endotrophin levels stratified into tertiles were not associated with markers of disease severity (Supplementary Table S2).
TABLE 1. Clinical characteristics stratified by serum endotrophin tertiles.
There was no correlation between serum and urinary endotrophin (Spearman r = 0.011, p = 0.70). As urinary endotrophin was corrected for urinary creatinine, we also analyzed serum endotrophin and urinary endotrophin not normalized for creatinine. There was no correlation between serum endotrophin and unadjusted urinary endotrophin (Spearman r = 0.044, p = 0.12).
The association between serum endotrophin and incidence of complications estimated by unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional-hazards models is shown in Figure 1. Higher levels of serum endotrophin were significantly associated with the kidney endpoint and all-cause mortality in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses (Figure 1A). When adjusting for conventional risk factors, the hazard ratio (HR) per doubling of serum endotrophin was 3.39 [95% CI: 1.98–5.82] for the kidney endpoint (n = 30/1,462), 1.28 [0.90–1.80] for first MACE (n = 82/1,316), and 1.44 [1.03–2.0] for all-cause mortality (n = 93/1,468) (Figure 1A). For the secondary endpoints, there was an association between a doubling of serum endotrophin and progression of albuminuria (n = 80/1,359) with a HR of 1.82 [1.32–2.52] but not with incident heart failure (n = 23/1,420) or sight-threatening diabetic eye-disease (n = 52/1,168) after adjustment (Figure 1B). No significant association between urinary endotrophin and the specified endpoints was observed after adjustment (data not shown).
FIGURE 1. Associations between serum endotrophin and incidence of complications estimated by Cox proportional-hazards models. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are listed per doubling of serum endotrophin for the primary (A) and secondary (B) endpoints. HRs are reported as unadjusted and adjusted for the conventional risk factors sex, baseline age, BMI, LDL-cholesterol, current smoking, HbA1c, systolic blood pressure, eGFR, and UAE (except for analyses on albuminuria progression). For each outcome, participants previously diagnosed with the outcome were excluded.
Discussion
In a cohort of 1,468 persons with type 1 diabetes, we demonstrate that higher serum levels of a fragment reflecting collagen type VI formation and endotrophin are associated with a higher hazard of death and kidney complications. Even when adjusted for the conventional risk factors, sex, age, BMI, LDL-cholesterol, current smoking, HbA1c, systolic blood pressure, eGFR, and UAE (except for analyses on albuminuria progression), serum endotrophin remained significantly associated with all-cause mortality, the kidney endpoint, and progression of albuminuria. These findings align with previous results for circulating endotrophin (Rasmussen et al., 2018; Frimodt-Møller et al., 2019; Pilemann-Lyberg et al., 2019; Rasmussen et al., 2022; Tougaard et al., 2022), highlighting the evidence for endotrophin as a relevant risk marker for progression of CKD and the development or progression of complications in diabetes.
We validated the previous findings of serum endotrophin in type 1 diabetes, where higher levels of serum endotrophin were independently associated with a higher risk of mortality and development of end-stage kidney disease (Pilemann-Lyberg et al., 2019). Of note, the participants in the present study cohort had a lower baseline age, diabetes duration, UAE, and higher eGFR compared to the participants included in the previous study (Pilemann-Lyberg et al., 2019).
We have previously shown that serum endotrophin was associated with all-cause mortality and kidney and cardiovascular complications in persons with type 2 diabetes (Tougaard et al., 2022) and persons with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria (Rasmussen et al., 2018). Moreover, in the CANVAS trial, plasma endotrophin was an independent risk marker for incident heart failure, cardiovascular disease, the composite kidney endpoints, and all-cause mortality (Rasmussen et al., 2022). Taken together, the robust results of circulating endotrophin across diabetes cohorts are promising for its application as a risk marker for complications.
In the RIISC study, a prospective, observational cohort of persons with high-risk CKD, serum endotrophin was independently associated with mortality in CKD (Fenton et al., 2017), suggesting that collagen type VI formation and endotrophin is mechanistically involved in the increased mortality risk associated with CKD. Moreover, in the PERF study, a prospective, observational cohort of elderly women without diabetes, serum endotrophin was associated with chronic multimorbidity and mortality independent of age and BMI (Staunstrup et al., 2021).
Importantly, previous studies have shown that collagen type VI is accumulated in the kidneys of persons with kidney disease (Nerlich et al., 1994; Vleming et al., 1995; Mason and Wahab, 2003), and colocalization of endotrophin with collagen type VI in the fibrotic kidney has been confirmed (Rasmussen et al., 2017).
To our knowledge, human intervention studies targeting endotrophin have yet to be conducted. Still, neutralizing the pro-fibrotic endotrophin with antibodies has been suggested to slow the imbalanced ECM remodeling in fibrogenesis (Williams et al., 2021). Interestingly, recent data from a podocyte ablation model showed that endotrophin neutralization through targeted antibody treatment protects from kidney fibrosis (An et al., 2023), suggesting that neutralizing endotrophin is a promising therapy for intervening with kidney fibrosis in CKD.
Results from the NEFIGAN and AWARD-7 trials showed that budesonide and dulaglutide treatment, respectively, reduced levels of circulating endotrophin (Maixnerova et al., 2021; Tuttle et al., 2023), indicating that budesonide and dulaglutide may reduce fibrosis by diminishing collagen type VI formation and levels of endotrophin. The nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, finerenone, reducing kidney and cardiovascular fibrosis in experimental studies (Kolkhof et al., 2014; Grune et al., 2018), has recently been shown to reduce progression of kidney and cardiovascular complications in type 2 diabetes (Agarwal et al., 2022). Finerenone has not yet been investigated in type 1 diabetes; however, short-term studies with spironolactone in persons with type 1 diabetes and kidney disease demonstrated a reduction in albuminuria (Schjoedt et al., 2005). Thus, serum endotrophin may be used to select persons who could benefit from preventive treatment with finerenone.
The strength of this study is that endotrophin was measured in a large, unselected, and well-characterized cohort. The limitation was that data on medication changes were unavailable.
Further investigation proving the utility of circulating endotrophin as a risk marker and potentially as an actor in disease progression will be important for designing and monitoring intervention strategies to reduce fibrosis and consequent organ function loss. Furthermore, it will be interesting to determine whether changes in endotrophin can predict a clinically meaningful response to therapies with kidney and cardiovascular outcomes benefit.
In conclusion, we validated the previous findings of endotrophin in type 1 diabetes in a large and unselected cohort. Higher levels of serum endotrophin, released during collagen type VI formation, were independently associated with a higher risk of mortality and development or progression of CKD in persons with type 1 diabetes. Urinary endotrophin was not associated with development of the specified complications.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the Regional Ethics Committee in The Capital Region of Denmark (H-19042436). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
Conceptualization and methodology: AM, NT, PFR, TH, FG, DR, and PR. Sample analysis: AM. Cohort database development: NT. Supervision: PFR, TH, PR, FG, DK, and MK. Data analysis: AM. Visualization: AM. Writing-original draft preparation: AM. Writing-review and editing: All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The Innovation Fund Denmark provided research support (0172-00270B) but did not play any additional role in the study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We thank the participants, laboratory technicians who collected the biobank material at Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, and Bibi Kamall for technical support at Nordic Bioscience.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2023.1229579/full#supplementary-material
References
Agarwal, R., Filippatos, G., Pitt, B., Anker, S. D., Rossing, P., Joseph, A., et al. (2022). Cardiovascular and kidney outcomes with finerenone in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: the FIDELITY pooled analysis. Eur. Heart J. 43 (6), 474–484A. doi:10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHAB777
Aigner, T., Hambach, L., Söder, S., Schlötzer-Schrehardt, U., and Pöschl, E. (2002). The C5 domain of Col6A3 is cleaved off from the Col6 fibrils immediately after secretion. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 290 (2), 743–748. doi:10.1006/BBRC.2001.6227
An, Y. A., Xiong, W., Chen, S., Bu, D., Rutkowski, J. M., Berger, J. P., et al. (2023). Endotrophin neutralization through targeted antibody treatment protects from renal fibrosis in a podocyte ablation model. Mol. Metab. 69, 101680. doi:10.1016/J.MOLMET.2023.101680
Baena-Díez, J. M., Peñafiel, J., Subirana, I., Ramos, R., Elosua, R., Marín-Ibañez, A., et al. (2016). Risk of cause-specific death in individuals with diabetes: a competing risks analysis. Diabetes Care 39 (11), 1987–1995. doi:10.2337/DC16-0614
Bülow, R. D., and Boor, P. (2019). Extracellular matrix in kidney fibrosis: more than just a scaffold. J. Histochem Cytochem 67 (9), 643–661. doi:10.1369/0022155419849388
Fenton, A., Jesky, M. D., Ferro, C. J., Sørensen, J., Karsdal, M. A., Cockwell, P., et al. (2017). Serum endotrophin, a type VI collagen cleavage product, is associated with increased mortality in chronic kidney disease. PLoS One 12, e0175200. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175200
Frimodt-Møller, M., Hansen, T. W., Rasmussen, D. G. K., Theilade, S., Nielsen, S. H., Karsdal, M. A., et al. (2019). A marker of type VI collagen formation (PRO-C6) is associated with higher arterial stiffness in type 1 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 56, 711–712. doi:10.1007/s00592-019-01306-9
Funcke, J. B., and Scherer, P. E. (2019). Beyond adiponectin and leptin: adipose tissue-derived mediators of inter-organ communication. J. Lipid Res. 60 (10), 1648–1684. doi:10.1194/jlr.R094060
Gelse, K., Pöschl, E., and Aigner, T. (2003). Collagens - structure, function, and biosynthesis. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 55, 1531–1546. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2003.08.002
Genovese, F., Manresa, A. A., Leeming, D. J., Karsdal, M. A., and Boor, P. (2014). The extracellular matrix in the kidney: a source of novel non-invasive biomarkers of kidney fibrosis? Fibrogenes Tissue Repair 7 (1), 4–14. doi:10.1186/1755-1536-7-4
Groop, P. H., Thomas, M. C., Moran, J. L., Wadèn, J., Thorn, L. M., Mäkinen, V. P., et al. (2009). The presence and severity of chronic kidney disease predicts all-cause mortality in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 58 (7), 1651–1658. doi:10.2337/DB08-1543
Grune, J., Beyhoff, N., Smeir, E., Chudek, R., Blumrich, A., Ban, Z., et al. (2018). Selective mineralocorticoid receptor cofactor modulation as molecular basis for finerenone's antifibrotic activity. Hypertension 71 (4), 599–608. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10360
Juhl, P., Bondesen, S., Hawkins, C. L., Karsdal, M. A., Bay-Jensen, A. C., Davies, M. J., et al. (2020). Dermal fibroblasts have different extracellular matrix profiles induced by TGF-β, PDGF and IL-6 in a model for skin fibrosis. Sci. Rep. 10 (1), 17300–17310. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74179-6
Karousou, E., D’Angelo, M. L., Kouvidi, K., Vigetti, D., Viola, M., Nikitovic, D., et al. (2014). Collagen VI and hyaluronan: the common role in breast cancer. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 606458. doi:10.1155/2014/606458
Karsdal, M. A., Manon-Jensen, T., Genovese, F., Kristensen, J. H., Nielsen, M. J., Sand, J. M. B., et al. (2015). Novel insights into the function and dynamics of extracellular matrix in liver fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. - Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 308, G807–G830. doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00447.2014
Kolkhof, P., Delbeck, M., Kretschmer, A., Steinke, W., Hartmann, E., Bärfacker, L., et al. (2014). Finerenone, a novel selective nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist protects from rat cardiorenal injury. J. Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 64 (1), 69–78. doi:10.1097/FJC.0000000000000091
Liu, Y. (2011). Cellular and molecular mechanisms of renal fibrosis. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 7 (12), 684–696. doi:10.1038/nrneph.2011.149
Maixnerova, D., Zdenka, H., Genovese, F., et al. (2021). “TRF-budesonide (nefecon) positively impacts serum and urinary biomarkers involved in interstitial fibrosis in patients with IgAN: analysis from the phase 2 NEFIGAN trial,” in Proceedings of 16th international symposium on IgA nephropathy (Berlin, Germany: Springer).
Mason, R. M., and Wahab, N. A. (2003). Extracellular matrix metabolism in diabetic nephropathy. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 14 (5), 1358–1373. doi:10.1097/01.ASN.0000065640.77499.D7
Møller, A. L. (2020). An in vitro model to elucidate the synthesis of extracellular matrix proteins involved in renal interstitial fibrosis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 31, 233.
Nerlich, A. G., Schleicher, E. D., Wiest, I., Specks, U., and Timpl, R. (1994). Immunohistochemical localization of collagen VI in diabetic glomeruli. Kidney Int. 45 (6), 1648–1656. doi:10.1038/KI.1994.216
Park, J., and Scherer, P. E. (2012). Adipocyte-derived endotrophin promotes malignant tumor progression. J. Clin. Invest. 122 (11), 4243–4256. doi:10.1172/JCI63930
Pilemann-Lyberg, S., Rasmussen, D. G. K., Hansen, T. W., Tofte, N., Winther, S. A., Holm Nielsen, S., et al. (2019). Markers of collagen formation and degradation reflect renal function and predict adverse outcomes in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 42 (9), 1760–1768. doi:10.2337/DC18-2599
Rasmussen, D. G. K., Fenton, A., Jesky, M., Ferro, C., Boor, P., Tepel, M., et al. (2017). Urinary endotrophin predicts disease progression in patients with chronic kidney disease. Sci. Rep. 7 (1), 17328–17411. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-17470-3
Rasmussen, D. G. K., Hansen, M. K., Blair, J., Jatkoe, T. A., Neal, B., Karsdal, M. A., et al. (2022). Endotrophin is a risk marker of complications in CANagliflozin cardioVascular assessment study (CANVAS): a randomized controlled trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 21 (1), 261–313. doi:10.1186/s12933-022-01666-7
Rasmussen, D. G. K., Hansen, T. W., Von Scholten, B. J., Nielsen, S. H., Reinhard, H., Parving, H. H., et al. (2018). Higher collagen VI formation is associated with all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Diabetes Care 41 (7), 1493–1500. doi:10.2337/DC17-2392
Rønnow, S. R., Dabbagh, R. Q., Genovese, F., Nanthakumar, C. B., Barrett, V. J., Good, R. B., et al. (2020). Prolonged scar-in-a-jar: an in vitro screening tool for anti-fibrotic therapies using biomarkers of extracellular matrix synthesis. Respir. Res. 21 (1), 108–114. doi:10.1186/s12931-020-01369-1
Schjoedt, K. J., Rossing, K., Juhl, T. R., Boomsma, F., Rossing, P., Tarnow, L., et al. (2005). Beneficial impact of spironolactone in diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int. 68, 2829–2836. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00756.x
Staunstrup, L. M., Bager, C. L., Frederiksen, P., Helge, J. W., Brunak, S., Christiansen, C., et al. (2021). Endotrophin is associated with chronic multimorbidity and all-cause mortality in a cohort of elderly women. EBioMedicine 68, 103391. doi:10.1016/J.EBIOM.2021.103391
Sun, S., Henriksen, K., Karsdal, M. A., Byrjalsen, I., Rittweger, J., Armbrecht, G., et al. (2015). Collagen type III and VI turnover in response to long-term immobilization. PLoS One 10, e0144525. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144525
Tougaard, N. H., Møller, A. L., Rønn, P. F., Hansen, T. W., Genovese, F., Karsdal, M. A., et al. (2022). Endotrophin as a marker of complications in a type 2 diabetes cohort. Diabetes Care 45, 2746–2748. doi:10.2337/DC22-0852
Tuttle, K. R., Wilson, J. M., Lin, Y., Qian, H. R., Genovese, F., Karsdal, M. A., et al. (2023). Indicators of kidney fibrosis in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease treated with dulaglutide. Am. J. Nephrol. 54, 74–82. doi:10.1159/000529374
Vleming, L. J., Baelde, J. J., Westendorp, R. G., Daha, M. R., van Es, L. A., and Bruijn, J. (1995). Progression of chronic renal disease in humans is associated with the deposition of basement membrane components and decorin in the interstitial extracellular matrix. Clin. Nephrol. 44, 211–219.
Williams, L., Layton, T., Yang, N., Feldmann, M., and Nanchahal, J. (2021). Collagen VI as a driver and disease biomarker in human fibrosis. FEBS J. 289, 3603–3629. doi:10.1111/febs.16039
Keywords: endotrophin, fibrosis, biomarker, extracellular matrix, collagen, diabetes complications
Citation: Møller AL, Tougaard NH, Rasmussen DGK, Genovese F, Rønn PF, Hansen TW, Karsdal MA and Rossing P (2023) Endotrophin as a risk marker of mortality and kidney complications in a type 1 diabetes cohort. Front. Mol. Biosci. 10:1229579. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1229579
Received: 26 May 2023; Accepted: 21 August 2023;
Published: 01 September 2023.
Edited by:
Arkadeep Mitra, City College, Kolkata, IndiaReviewed by:
Dinesh Yadav, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United StatesTrisha Bansal, University of Illinois Chicago, United States
Copyright © 2023 Møller, Tougaard, Rasmussen, Genovese, Rønn, Hansen, Karsdal and Rossing. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alexandra Louise Møller, alm@nordicbio.com