Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mol. Biosci., 18 June 2025

Sec. Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2025.1635227

This article is part of the Research TopicInnovative Mechanisms of AKI, the Molecular Biology Mechanisms Underlying the Transition of AKI to AKD/CKD and New Diagnostic TechniquesView all articles

The prognostic value of admission serum uric acid for acute kidney injury: a two-center retrospective analysis

Shuo Huang,,,,&#x;Shuo Huang1,2,3,4,5Linger Tang,,,,&#x;Linger Tang1,2,3,4,5Lingyi Xu,,,,Lingyi Xu1,2,3,4,5Jinwei Wang,,,,Jinwei Wang1,2,3,4,5Xizi Zheng,,,,
Xizi Zheng1,2,3,4,5*
  • 1Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 2Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Beijing, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Beijing, China
  • 4Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, China
  • 5Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of Immune-Mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a serious clinical syndrome, with elevated serum uric acid (SUA) recognized as a potential modifiable risk factor. Nonetheless, the association between reduced SUA and the risk of AKI, along with the modification by kidney function on this association, is not well understood.

Methods: All adult patients from Peking University First Hospital (PKUFH) were screened. The primary outcome was AKI during hospitalization. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) was utilized to examine the hypothesized non-linearity between AKI and SUA as a continuous variable. SUA was categorized into six groups and Poisson regression was applied to evaluate the association between SUA groups and AKI with 240–360 μmol/L as reference. Subgroup analysis was conducted in terms of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

Results: Among 62,775 patients enrolled from PKUFH, 1,866 patients developed AKI (3.0%). The RCS plot showed a U-shaped association between SUA and AKI. Compared with reference group, SUA ≤ 180 μmol/L and >480 μmol/L exhibited a 2.17-fold and a 4.86-fold increased risk of AKI in the unadjusted model. After full adjustment, the associated risk of AKI in SUA ≤ 180 μmol/L (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.57–2.36) and SUA > 480 μmol/L (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03–1.34) was weakened but still demonstrated statistical significance. When stratified by eGFR, the U-shaped risk curve was much less steep in the subgroup with eGFR ≤ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Conclusion: This study reveals a U-shaped association between admission SUA and AKI risk. Kidney function is an important confounder for this association.

1 Introduction

Acute kidney injury (AKI) constitutes a critical clinical syndrome affecting more than 20% of hospitalized patients worldwide (Susantitaphong et al., 2013), leading to considerable morbidity and mortality. Currently, there are no established therapeutic interventions for AKI, highlighting the urgent need to identify modifiable risk factors to improve prognosis. Elevated serum uric acid (SUA) is recognized as one such risk factor. Aside from crystal precipitation and obstruction in tubules (Spencer et al., 1976), the biological plausibility of uric acid as a potential toxin affecting the kidneys is supported by numerous in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrating its capability to induce inflammation (Meotti et al., 2011), oxidative stress (George and Struthers, 2009), activation of the renin-angiotensin system (Zhang et al., 2015), and vascular remodeling (Kirca et al., 2017).

In contrast to the thorough investigation into the association between elevated SUA and AKI across various clinical contexts such as cardiac surgery (Gaipov et al., 2015), acute leukemia (Ejaz et al., 2015) and contrast exposure (Park et al., 2011; Mendi et al., 2017), the impact of reduced SUA on AKI risk remains poorly understood with inconsistent findings reported (Otomo et al., 2016; Cheungpasitporn et al., 2016). The variations in baseline kidney function among the study population may elucidate this inconsistency, as the modified effect of baseline kidney function on the association between SUA and long-term kidney prognosis has been noted (Meier-Kriesche et al., 2009; Srivastava et al., 2018). To conduct a comprehensive investigation into the association between various SUA levels and AKI in hospitalized patients while also accounting for the potential confounding effect of baseline kidney function on this association, we initiated this study using a two-center design with an external validation cohort to corroborate the findings across diverse populations.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Datasets

Data were obtained from two independent databases: the Peking University First Hospital (PKUFH) database as the development cohort and the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database (MIMIC-IV) as the external validation cohort. PKUFH database recorded all 210,550 admissions from 2018 to 2021 in PKUFU, a large academic medical center hospital in Beijing, China. MIMIC-IV contains 180,747 de-identified electronic health records from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2008 to 2019. The PKUFH database and the MIMIC-IV database were approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Peking University First Hospital (2025 063-001) and the institutional review boards of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (2001-P-001699/14) and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (No. 0403000206).

2.2 Study population

All patients with at least one measurement of SUA within 48 h of admission and two measurements of serum creatinine (SCr) during hospitalization were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were as follows (Susantitaphong et al., 2013): age less than 18 years (Spencer et al., 1976), long-term dialysis or an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 at admission (Meotti et al., 2011), kidney resection or transplantation (George and Struthers, 2009), AKI developed within 48 h of admission, and (Zhang et al., 2015) hospital stay shorter than 48 h. AKI was defined based on the KDIGO guidelines as an increase in SCr by 26.5 μmol/L or more within 48 h or an increase of at least 1.5 times the reference SCr within 7 days (Khwaja, 2012).

2.3 Data collection

Data from PKUFH were systematically collected through chart abstraction utilizing the institution’s clinical data warehouse, while data from the MIMIC-IV database were retrieved through Structured Query Language. The initial SUA level obtained within 48 h of admission was recorded. Chronic comorbidities were identified based on diagnoses at admission or discharge, in accordance with the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes. Cardiovascular diseases include conditions such as coronary artery disease and chronic heart failure. Laboratory indices and prescribed medications were documented if they were measured or administered within 48 h of admission, respectively. ICU admission was defined as the admission or transfer of patients to the ICU within 48 h following their initial admission.

2.4 Exposure and outcome

The primary exposure was admission SUA, which was measured within 48 h of admission by standard laboratory procedures using the uricase/peroxidase enzymatic methods (AU5800; Beckman Coulter, United States) and measured at the PKUFH Central Laboratory. The primary outcome is AKI during hospitalization, defined by KDIGO SCr criteria.

2.5 Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and analyzed using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD or medians (interquartile range) depending on their distribution and compared using non-parametric tests. Multiple imputations were used to address missing values. Linear regression was used to examine the association between SUA and kidney function (SCr and eGFR).

Given that prior research has suggested a potential non-linear association between SUA and AKI, a restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was conducted to examine this proposed non-linearity, treating SUA as a continuous variable. The optimal number of knots in the spline was identified by selecting the lowest Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) value. To test for non-linearity, a likelihood ratio test was employed, comparing a model that considered only linear factors to one that included both linear and cubic spline components.

A multivariable Poisson regression analysis was performed to assess the association between SUA groups and AKI. Admission SUA levels were utilized to categorize patients into six groups: ≤180, 180–240, 240–360, 360–420, 420–480 and >480 μmol/L. The normal SUA range of 240–360 μmol/L was defined as the reference group (Richette et al., 2017). This analysis adjusted for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), eGFR at admission, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, liver cirrhosis, malignancy, diuretics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), contrast, SUA-lowering medications, ICU admission, albumin, prealbumin, and hemoglobin. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to quantify the associations.

A subgroup analysis was conducted to determine whether differences existed in eGFR subgroups concerning the association between SUA and AKI. An eGFR of 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 was chosen as the discrimination value based on evidence indicating that the clinical impact of elevated SUA and SUA-lowering therapies was limited in patients with this level of kidney function loss (≥stage 3b CKD) (Srivastava et al., 2018; Maahs et al., 2013). We performed sensitivity analysis by constraining AKI to a 7-day period within the hospital stay because changes in disease conditions and medications during hospitalization might affect SUA levels. Furthermore, we excluded patients receiving uric acid-lowering medications that could substantially alter SUA levels.

External validation was conducted by reanalyzing the MIMIC-IV database. Patients were categorized into six groups based on admission SUA levels, using the same criteria as in the PKUFH cohort. Subsequently, multivariable Poisson regression was applied, adjusting for the same covariates as in the PKUFH cohort, except for prealbumin, which was not available in the MIMIC-IV database.

3 Results

3.1 Baseline characteristics of the development cohort

During the period from 1 January 2018, to 31 December 2020, a total of 210,550 patients were admitted to PKUFH. Of these, 62,775 admissions met the criteria for inclusion in this study (Supplementary Figure 1A). The study population had a median age of 61 (48, 70) years old, and 55.5% of the participants (n = 34,818) were male. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (n = 28,854, 46.0%), diabetes (n = 15,767, 25.1%), and cardiovascular disease (n = 15,292, 24.4%). The median SUA was 329 (266, 402) μmol/L, and the median eGFR was 92.1 (74.8, 103.5) mL/min/1.73 m2. The linear regression analysis revealed significant associations between serum uric acid and kidney function: a positive relationship with SCr (β = 0.40, 95% CI [0.39, 0.41], P < 0.001) and an inverse relationship with eGFR (β = −1.74, 95% CI [−1.77, −1.71], P < 0. 001). SUA-lowering medication was prescribed in 2.1% of the entire population. Additional information is available in Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of PKUFH patients.

3.2 Association between SUA and AKI in the development cohort

RCS was used to demonstrate the relationship between SUA and the risk of AKI. A nonlinear association revealing a U-shaped risk pattern (P for non-linearity < 0.001) was shown. The slope of the U-shaped curve becomes gentler after adjusting for covariates (Figures 1A, B). Notably, the downward-sloping segment of the curve is steeper than the upward-sloping part, indicating a significantly increased AKI risk associated with decreased SUA.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Nonlinear association between serum uric acid levels and acute kidney injury in PKUFH database before and after adjustment, demonstrated by restricted cubic spline analysis. (A) Unadjusted Restricted Cubic Spline Plot; (B) Fully adjusted Restricted Cubic Spline Plot. (B) was adjusted for age, gender, BMI, eGFR at admission, comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, liver cirrhosis, malignancy), medication (diuretic, NSAIDs, contrast, SUA-lowering medication), ICU admission, laboratory tests (Alb, Hb, prealbumin).

The incidence of AKI was 4.1% (n = 122), 2.0% (n = 148), 1.9% (n = 529), 2.5% (n = 280), 3.6% (n = 232), and 9.1% (n = 555) for SUA levels of ≤180, 180–240, 240–360, 360–420, 420–480 and >480 μmol/L, respectively. Using patients with SUA levels ranging from 240 to 360 μmol/L as a reference group, the risk of AKI was elevated across all SUA groups except for the 180–240 μmol/L group (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.88–1.27) in the unadjusted analyses (Table 2, Model 1). Notably, patients with SUA levels ≤180 μmol/L and >480 μmol/L exhibited a 2.17-fold (RR 2.17, 95% CI 1.78–2.64) and a 4.86-fold (RR 4.86, 95% CI 4.32–5.48) increased risk of AKI, respectively. The association between SUA and AKI was not significantly modified by demographic variables but was considerably confounded by eGFR. After adjusting for eGFR, the risk of AKI associated with SUA ≤ 180 μmol/L was significantly increased (RR 2.86, 95% CI 2.35–3.49). Conversely, the risk was notably reduced in the group with SUA > 480 μmol/L (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.21–1.58). After full adjustment, the associated risk of AKI in SUA ≤ 180 μmol/L (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.57–2.36) and SUA > 480 μmol/L (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03–1.34) was weakened but still demonstrated statistical significance.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Association between staged serum uric acid and acute kidney injury in PKUFH database.

After restricting AKI to the 7-day post-admission period, the U-shaped trend in the association between SUA and AKI was also observed, with patients having SUA ≤ 180 μmol/L exhibiting the highest incidence (RR 1.93, 95% CI 1.35–2.76) (Figure 2; Supplementary Table 1). Similar findings were found after excluding patients receiving uric acid-lowering therapy, as those with SUA ≤ 180 μmol/L continued to show the highest risk (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.61–2.43) (Supplementary Table 2).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Sensitivity analysis: nonlinear association between serum uric acid levels and acute kidney injury within 7 days after admission in PKUFH database after full adjustment, demonstrated by restricted cubic spline analysis.

3.3 Association between SUA and AKI in different eGFR subgroups

In the development cohort, when stratified by an eGFR threshold of 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, a similar U-shaped risk curve between SUA and AKI was observed (Figure 3); however, the curve was much less steep in the subgroup with eGFR ≤ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Similar findings were observed in the multivariate Poisson regression analysis. Compared with the reference group (SUA 240–360 μmol/L), the increased AKI risk for SUA≤180 μmol/L (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.12–1.76) and SUA >480 μmol/L (RR 2.18, 95% CI 1.80–2.64) remains statistically significant only in the subgroup with eGFR > 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. While in the subgroup with eGFR ≤ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, the association between SUA and AKI was not significant in all groups (Supplementary Table 3).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Subgroup analysis: nonlinear association between serum uric acid levels and acute kidney injury in PKUFH after full adjustment, stratified by eGFR (≤45 mL/min/1.73 m2 or >45 mL/min/1.73 m2).

3.4 Association between SUA and AKI in the external validation cohort

A total of 7,160 patients were enrolled from screened 180,747 patients in the MIMIC-IV database (Supplementary Figure 1B). The median age was 61 (45, 71) years and 49.9% (n = 3,574) was male. The most common comorbidities were malignancy (n = 4,632, 64.7%) and hypertension (n = 2,383, 33.3%). The median SUA was 309.3 (237.9, 398.5) μmol/L and eGFR was 100.2 (78.7, 115.6) mL/min/1.73 m2. SUA-lowering medication was prescribed in 29.7% of the entire population. The baseline characteristics of the validation cohort were presented in Supplementary Table 4.

The incidence of AKI was 169 (24.1%), 217 (18.8%), 523 (18.6%), 209 (21.8%), 131 (23.1%), and 287 (29.9%) in groups with SUA ≤ 180, 180–240, 240–360, 360–420, 420–480, and >480 μmol/L, respectively. A similar, though less steep, U-shaped curve between SUA and AKI was observed (Supplementary Figure 2). After full adjustment, the AKI risk remained statistically significant only for SUA ≤ 180 μmol/L (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03–1.46). Results of the Poisson regression analysis were displayed in Supplementary Table 5.

4 Discussion

In this study, the admission SUA displayed a U-shaped relationship with AKI during hospitalization, with the curve being steeper in the reduced SUA segment than in the elevated SUA segment. This association was confounded by eGFR, particularly for the elevated SUA.

AKI is a serious syndrome in hospitalized patients with no effective treatments available. SUA, functioning as both an antioxidant and a prooxidant, has gained significant attention in the field of AKI. Previous studies have mainly concentrated on the risk of AKI linked to hyperuricemia (Ejaz et al., 2015; Park et al., 2011; Mendi et al., 2017), potentially neglecting the valuable insights that could be gained from analyzing SUA as a continuous measure. Furthermore, many studies were carried out in specific populations, which restricts the generalizability of their findings. To our knowledge, only two studies have evaluated the association between SUA and AKI in general hospitalized patients, and inconsistent findings were observed (Otomo et al., 2016; Cheungpasitporn et al., 2016). Cheungpasitporn et al. (2016) described a positive correlation between SUA level at admission and AKI risk after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, baseline SCr, principal diagnosis comorbidities, and medications. However, selection bias is evident in this study, as only 1.9% (1,435/76,719) of the screened patients had SUA measurements upon admission. The other study in Japan found that both reduced and elevated SUA were associated with a heightened risk of AKI (Otomo et al., 2016), which aligns with our study where a U-shaped risk curve was observed. These findings demonstrate substantial clinical importance in forecasting the risk among hospitalized patients, as reduced SUA levels at admission present a notable risk factor.

Several potential mechanisms may explain the impact of reduced SUA on the increased risk of AKI in our study. First, reduced SUA could result from inadequate intake and is often accompanied by malnutrition, a well-recognized risk factor for AKI (Cao et al., 2021; Beberashvili et al., 2016; Beberashvili et al., 2015). This is demonstrated in our study, where the lowest serum albumin and prealbumin levels were observed in patients with SUA ≤ 180 μmol/L. Second, approximately 90% of filtered uric acid is reabsorbed in the proximal tubule (Bobulescu and Moe, 2012). Reduced SUA may indicate weakened tubular reabsorption disorders due to various conditions such as Fanconi syndrome (Kim and Jun, 2022), which could also increase the vulnerability to AKI (Yeum et al., 2004; Vallon, 2016). Moreover, since SUA contributes to approximately 60% of plasma’s total antioxidant capacity (Yeum et al., 2004), reduced SUA may, therefore, increase the kidney’s vulnerability to oxidative stress, such as ischemia-reperfusion, sepsis, or nephrotoxins (Park et al., 2020). It is important to note that SUA-lowering medication was prescribed to a certain proportion of patients with reduced SUA. Our findings hold significant medical relevance, indicating that treatment intensity must be carefully tailored to prevent excessively low levels of SUA in accordance with guidelines (Richette et al., 2017).

Decreased kidney function can lead to elevated SUA. Conversely, elevated SUA may accelerate kidney impairment due to crystal deposition, inflammation, and oxidative stress (Sánchez-Lozada et al., 2005). Many large observational studies have examined the association between SUA and prognosis in CKD patients, yielding conflicting results (Miyaoka et al., 2014; Russo et al., 2021; Madero et al., 2009). There is no consensus on the targeted SUA range of treatment approaches for CKD patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia (Eleftheriadis et al., 2017). In a sub-analysis of the Symphony trial involving 1,645 kidney transplant recipients, after adjusting for baseline kidney function, SUA levels no longer showed an independent effect on the progression of kidney dysfunction over the 3 years following transplantation (Meier-Kriesche et al., 2009). We also found that the association between SUA and AKI was modified by baseline kidney function. The increased risk of AKI associated with elevated SUA was only observed in the subgroup with eGFR > 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Similarly, a prospective cohort study involving 3,885 individuals with CKD stages 2–4 revealed that elevated SUA was independently linked to an increased risk of kidney failure in participants with eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 but not in those with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Srivastava et al., 2018). Our findings contribute to the evidence that optimal SUA levels require further definition at both the upper and lower thresholds in patients with existing CKD. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of making appropriate adjustments for kidney function when assessing the effects of SUA.

Our study possesses several noteworthy strengths that contribute to its significance and reliability. First and foremost, it boasts the largest sample size recorded to date for exploring the association between SUA levels and AKI in hospitalized patients. This extensive sample size provides a robust foundation for our analysis and enhances the validity of our conclusions. Second, we conducted meticulous adjustments for a variety of potential confounding factors that could influence the results, such as nutritional indicators and medications known to affect uric acid metabolism. This careful consideration allows us to account for variables that might skew the relationship we are investigating. Lastly, our research included two distinct healthcare centers that serve demographically diverse populations, which significantly enhances the generalizability of our findings. By incorporating this diversity, we ensure that our results are more applicable to a broader range of hospitalized patients, making our study more impactful in the clinical context.

Our study has several limitations. Firstly, pre-admission SCr was unavailable for most patients, which may have led to the underdiagnosis of community-acquired AKI cases. To mitigate this impact, we excluded patients who fulfilled the AKI criteria within 48 h of admission. Secondly, there is a possibility of selection bias due to the retrospective nature, as patients who underwent admission SUA tests may exhibit different clinical characteristics compared to those who did not receive these tests upon admission. A multicenter, prospective study is needed to address this limitation. Lastly, similar to all observational studies, the results of this study may still be affected by unmeasured confounders despite comprehensive adjustments.

5 Conclusion

We identified a U-shaped association between admission SUA levels and AKI risk, with both elevated and reduced SUA independently predicting higher AKI incidence in hospitalized patients. This association was significantly influenced by the patients’ baseline kidney function. Additional research is necessary to ascertain the optimal SUA range in hospitalized patients to mitigate the risk of AKI.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by The Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Peking University First Hospital (2025 063-001), the institutional review boards of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (2001-P-001699/14) and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (No. 0403000206). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

SH: Investigation, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Data curation. LT: Data curation, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft. LX: Writing – review and editing, Data curation, Conceptualization. JW: Writing – review and editing, Methodology. XZ: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review and editing, Funding acquisition.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. Beijing Nova Program (2021051); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Peking University Clinical Scientist Training Program (BMU2023PYJH023); Clinical Medicine Plus X-Young Scholars Project, Peking University, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (PKU2023LCXQ002).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Department of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, for providing the research platform, and Professor Yang Li for her guidance on this project.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2025.1635227/full#supplementary-material

References

Beberashvili, I., Erlich, A., Azar, A., Sinuani, I., Feldman, L., Gorelik, O., et al. (2016). Longitudinal study of serum uric acid, nutritional status, and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 11 (6), 1015–1023. doi:10.2215/CJN.10400915

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beberashvili, I., Sinuani, I., Azar, A., Shapiro, G., Feldman, L., Stav, K., et al. (2015). Serum uric acid as a clinically useful nutritional marker and predictor of outcome in maintenance hemodialysis patients. NUTRITION 31 (1), 138–147. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2014.06.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bobulescu, I. A., and Moe, O. W. (2012). Renal transport of uric acid: evolving concepts and uncertainties. Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 19 (6), 358–371. doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2012.07.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, Z., Dai, S., and Liu, X. (2021). The geriatric nutritional risk index mediated the relationship between serum uric acid and hypertension: a mediation analysis. BMC Geriatr. 21 (1), 527. doi:10.1186/s12877-021-02483-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheungpasitporn, W., Thongprayoon, C., Harrison, A. M., and Erickson, S. B. (2016). Admission hyperuricemia increases the risk of acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients. Clin. Kidney J. 9 (1), 51–56. doi:10.1093/ckj/sfv086

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ejaz, A. A., Pourafshar, N., Mohandas, R., Smallwood, B. A., Johnson, R. J., and Hsu, J. W. (2015). Uric acid and the prediction models of tumor lysis syndrome in AML. PLoS One 10 (3), e0119497. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119497

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eleftheriadis, T., Golphinopoulos, S., Pissas, G., and Stefanidis, I. (2017). Asymptomatic hyperuricemia and chronic kidney disease: narrative review of a treatment controversial. J. Adv. Res. 8 (5), 555–560. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2017.05.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gaipov, A., Solak, Y., Turkmen, K., Toker, A., Baysal, A. N., Cicekler, H., et al. (2015). Serum uric acid may predict development of progressive acute kidney injury after open heart surgery. Ren. Fail 37 (1), 96–102. doi:10.3109/0886022X.2014.976130

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

George, J., and Struthers, A. D. (2009). Role of urate, xanthine oxidase and the effects of allopurinol in vascular oxidative stress. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 5 (1), 265–272. doi:10.2147/vhrm.s4265

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khwaja, A. (2012). KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin. Pract. 120 (4), c179–c184. doi:10.1159/000339789

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, G. H., and Jun, J. B. (2022). Altered serum uric acid levels in kidney disorders. Life (Basel) 12 (11), 1891. doi:10.3390/life12111891

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kirca, M., Oguz, N., Cetin, A., Uzuner, F., and Yesilkaya, A. (2017). Uric acid stimulates proliferative pathways in vascular smooth muscle cells through the activation of p38 MAPK, p44/42 MAPK and PDGFRβ. J. Recept Signal Transduct. Res. 37 (2), 167–173. doi:10.1080/10799893.2016.1203941

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maahs, D. M., Caramori, L., Cherney, D. Z. I., Galecki, A. T., Gao, C., Jalal, D., et al. (2013). Uric acid lowering to prevent kidney function loss in diabetes: the preventing early renal function loss (PERL) allopurinol study. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 13 (4), 550–559. doi:10.1007/s11892-013-0381-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Madero, M., Sarnak, M. J., Wang, X., Greene, T., Beck, G. J., Kusek, J. W., et al. (2009). Uric acid and long-term outcomes in CKD. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 53 (5), 796–803. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.12.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meier-Kriesche, H. U., Schold, J. D., Vanrenterghem, Y., Halloran, P. F., and Ekberg, H. (2009). Uric acid levels have no significant effect on renal function in adult renal transplant recipients: evidence from the symphony study. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 4 (10), 1655–1660. doi:10.2215/CJN.02700409

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mendi, M. A., Afsar, B., Oksuz, F., Turak, O., Yayla, C., Ozcan, F., et al. (2017). Uric acid is a useful tool to predict contrast-induced nephropathy. Angiology 68 (7), 627–632. doi:10.1177/0003319716639187

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meotti, F. C., Jameson, G. N. L., Turner, R., Harwood, D. T., Stockwell, S., Rees, M. D., et al. (2011). Urate as a physiological substrate for myeloperoxidase: implications for hyperuricemia and inflammation. J. Biol. Chem. 286 (15), 12901–12911. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.172460

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miyaoka, T., Mochizuki, T., Takei, T., Tsuchiya, K., and Nitta, K. (2014). Serum uric acid levels and long-term outcomes in chronic kidney disease. Heart Vessels 29 (4), 504–512. doi:10.1007/s00380-013-0396-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Otomo, K., Horino, T., Miki, T., Kataoka, H., Hatakeyama, Y., Matsumoto, T., et al. (2016). Serum uric acid level as a risk factor for acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients: a retrospective database analysis using the integrated medical information system at Kochi Medical School hospital. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 20 (2), 235–243. doi:10.1007/s10157-015-1156-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Park, J. H., Jo, Y. I., and Lee, J. H. (2020). Renal effects of uric acid: hyperuricemia and hypouricemia. Korean J. Intern Med. 35 (6), 1291–1304. doi:10.3904/kjim.2020.410

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Park, S. H., Shin, W. Y., Lee, E. Y., Gil, H. W., Lee, S. W., Lee, S. J., et al. (2011). The impact of hyperuricemia on in-hospital mortality and incidence of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ. J. 75 (3), 692–697. doi:10.1253/circj.cj-10-0631

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Richette, P., Doherty, M., Pascual, E., Barskova, V., Becce, F., Castañeda-Sanabria, J., et al. (2017). 2016 updated EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of gout. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 76 (1), 29–42. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209707

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Russo, E., Viazzi, F., Pontremoli, R., Barbagallo, C. M., Bombelli, M., Casiglia, E., et al. (2021). Serum uric acid and kidney disease measures independently predict cardiovascular and total mortality: the uric acid right for heart health (URRAH) project. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 8, 713652. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2021.713652

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sánchez-Lozada, L. G., Tapia, E., Santamaría, J., Avila-Casado, C., Soto, V., Nepomuceno, T., et al. (2005). Mild hyperuricemia induces vasoconstriction and maintains glomerular hypertension in normal and remnant kidney rats. Kidney Int. 67 (1), 237–247. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00074.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spencer, H. W., Yarger, W. E., and Robinson, R. R. (1976). Alterations of renal function during dietary-induced hyperuricemia in the rat. Kidney Int. 9 (6), 489–500. doi:10.1038/ki.1976.63

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Srivastava, A., Kaze, A. D., McMullan, C. J., Isakova, T., and Waikar, S. S. (2018). Uric acid and the risks of kidney failure and death in individuals with CKD. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 71 (3), 362–370. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.08.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Susantitaphong, P., Cruz, D. N., Cerda, J., Abulfaraj, M., Alqahtani, F., Koulouridis, I., et al. (2013). World incidence of AKI: a meta-analysis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 8 (9), 1482–1493. doi:10.2215/CJN.00710113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vallon, V. (2016). Tubular transport in acute kidney injury: relevance for diagnosis, prognosis and intervention. Nephron. 134 (3), 160–166. doi:10.1159/000446448

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yeum, K. J., Russell, R. M., Krinsky, N. I., and Aldini, G. (2004). Biomarkers of antioxidant capacity in the hydrophilic and lipophilic compartments of human plasma. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 430 (1), 97–103. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2004.03.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J. X., Zhang, Y. P., Wu, Q. N., and Chen, B. (2015). Uric acid induces oxidative stress via an activation of the renin-angiotensin system in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Endocrine 48 (1), 135–142. doi:10.1007/s12020-014-0239-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: acute kidney injury, serum uric acid, hyperuricemia, hypouricemia, estimated glomerular filtration rate

Citation: Huang S, Tang L, Xu L, Wang J and Zheng X (2025) The prognostic value of admission serum uric acid for acute kidney injury: a two-center retrospective analysis. Front. Mol. Biosci. 12:1635227. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2025.1635227

Received: 26 May 2025; Accepted: 05 June 2025;
Published: 18 June 2025.

Edited by:

Heng Jin, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, China

Reviewed by:

Larance Ronsard, Ragon Institute, United States
Yan Zhang, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, China
Qi Lv, Tianjin University, China

Copyright © 2025 Huang, Tang, Xu, Wang and Zheng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xizi Zheng, eGl6aXpoZW5nQGJqbXUuZWR1LmNu

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.